DOCSLIB.ORG

GAO-18-9, COAST GUARD: Actions Needed to Close Stations Identified

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GAO-18-9, COAST GUARD: Actions Needed to Close Stations Identified United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, U.S. Senate October 2017 COAST GUARD Actions Needed to Close Stations Identified as Overlapping and Unnecessarily Duplicative GAO-18-9 October 2017 COAST GUARD Actions Needed to Close Stations Identified as Overlapping and Unnecessarily Duplicative Highlights of GAO-18-9, a report to the Chairman, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, U.S. Senate Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The Coast Guard, within the GAO found that the U.S. Coast Guard has a sound process for analyzing its boat Department of Homeland Security stations that includes clear and specific steps for analyzing the need for stations (DHS), is charged with preventing loss using terms that can be readily defined and measured. In 2013, following this of life, injury, and property damage in process, the Coast Guard and its contractor identified 18 unnecessarily the maritime environment through its duplicative boat stations with overlapping coverage that could be permanently SAR mission. It maintains over 200 closed without negatively affecting the Coast Guard’s ability to meet its 2-hour stations with various assets, such as search and rescue (SAR) response standard and other mission requirements. boats and helicopters (depending on The process was designed to ensure the Coast Guard met or exceeded the station), along U.S. coasts and requirements to maintain SAR coverage and to account for such factors as boat inland waterways to carry out this downtime and surge capacity to respond to certain incidents. Further, the boat mission, as well as its other missions such as maritime security. Resource station analysis did not consider potential SAR responses by the Coast Guard’s limitations and changes to operations air stations and facilities, which can provide additional overlapping coverage. require the Coast Guard to periodically Coast Guard officials said that the closures would, among other things, help reexamine the need for these stations. improve operations by consolidating boat station caseloads to help ensure GAO was asked to review these personnel were active enough to maintain training requirements. efforts. Overlap of Coast Guard Search and Rescue Coverage Provided by Boat Stations, Air Stations, This report addresses, among other and Air Facilities as of May 2017 objectives, the extent to which the Coast Guard has (1) a sound process for analyzing the need for its boat stations and (2) taken actions to implement its boat station process results. GAO reviewed Coast Guard laws, standards, and guidance; analyzed Coast Guard data on station locations and SAR coverage; and analyzed the process and criteria used to evaluate its station needs and compared it with established evaluation design practices and internal control standards. GAO also interviewed Coast Guard officials. What GAO Recommends GAO is making three recommendations, including one recommendation that the Coast Guard close unnecessarily duplicative stations that its analysis identified. In 2017, the Coast Guard affirmed that its leadership believes the 2013 study DHS concurred with the remains valid, but so far the agency has not taken actions to implement the recommendations and stated it plans closures identified by its sound process. Instead, the Coast Guard is to act to eliminate unnecessary recommending conversion of some year-round stations to seasonal stations that duplication. would operate during the summer. Coast Guard officials stated that seasonal closures are preferable to no action, given its limited resources, the significant overlapping SAR coverage, and potential to improve operations. However, View GAO-18-9. For more information, contact Jennifer Grover at (202) 512-7141 or permanently closing unnecessarily duplicative stations may better position the [email protected]. Coast Guard to improve its operations. It could also achieve up to $290 million in cost savings over 20 years, if stations were permanently closed. United States Government Accountability Office Contents Letter 1 Background 6 Coast Guard Has a Sound Process for Analyzing the Need for Boat Stations and the Results Identified Overlap and Unnecessary Duplication 13 A 2014 Analysis of Selected Coast Guard Air Stations and Air Facilities Identified Unnecessary Duplication but Coast Guard Would Benefit from a Comprehensive Process 22 Coast Guard Has Not Taken Actions nor Developed a Plan to Close Unnecessarily Duplicative Stations Its Analyses Identified 26 Conclusions 37 Recommendations for Executive Action 38 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 38 Appendix I Scope and Methodology 40 Appendix II Selected Coast Guard Assets 44 Appendix III Extent of Search and Rescue Coverage by Coast Guard Boat Stations in the Contiguous United States 46 Appendix IV Reported Single-Boat Search and Rescue Responses by Selected Stations, Fiscal Years 2010 through 2016 50 Appendix V Comments from the Department of Homeland Security 53 Appendix VI GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments 55 Tables Table 1: Coast Guard’s 9-Step Boat Station Optimization Process, Criteria, and Actions Taken for Each Process Step 17 Page i GAO-18-9 Coast Guard Search and Rescue Table 2: Summary of Selected Coast Guard Recommendations to Change Boat Station Operations 30 Table 3: Selected Coast Guard Boats Used for Search and Rescue (SAR) at Boat Stations 45 Table 4: Total Single Station Coast Guard Search and Rescue (SAR) Cases for Selected Boat Stations, Fiscal Years (FY) 2010 through 2016, and Estimated FY 2015 Annual Operating Cost 50 Table 5: Winter Single Station Coast Guard Search and Rescue (SAR) Cases Reported for Selected Boat Stations, Fiscal Years 2010 through 2016 52 Figures Figure 1: Coast Guard’s Field Structure 8 Figure 2: How the Coast Guard Conducts a Search and Rescue (SAR) Case 10 Figure 3: GAO Definitions of Fragmentation, Overlap, and Duplication 12 Figure 4: Coast Guard’s 9-Step Station Optimization Process with Criteria to Analyze the Need for Boat Stations 14 Figure 5: Extent of Search and Rescue Coverage Provided by Coast Guard Boat Stations in Districts 1, 5, and 9 Reported in September 2013 (Current as of May 2017) 16 Figure 6: Map of Coast Guard Helicopter Coverage as of August 2017 24 Figure 7: Timeline of Studies and Actions to Address the Need for Coast Guard Stations, 1970 to 2017 (number of proposed closures denoted within the shapes below) 28 Figure 8: Overlap of Coast Guard Search and Rescue Coverage Provided by Boat Stations, Air Stations, and Air Facilities, May 2017 35 Figure 9: Extent of Search and Rescue Coverage by Boat Stations in the Contiguous United States Reported in September 2013 (Current as of May 2017) 46 Figure 10: Extent of Search and Rescue Coverage by Coast Guard Boat Stations in District 1 Reported in September 2013 (Current as of May 2017) 47 Figure 11: Extent of Search and Rescue Coverage by Coast Guard Boat Stations in District 5 Reported in September 2013 (Current as of May 2017) 48 Page ii GAO-18-9 Coast Guard Search and Rescue Figure 12: Extent of Search and Rescue Coverage by Coast Guard Boat Stations in District 9 Reported in September 2013 (Current as of May 2017) 49 Abbreviations ACCAM Aviation Capability and Capacity Assignment Module BBEDCA Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act BCA Budget Control Act cgSARVA Coast Guard Search and Rescue Visual Analytics D1 Coast Guard District 1 D5 Coast Guard District 5 D9 Coast Guard District 9 DHS Department of Homeland Security FY fiscal year MISLE Marine Information for Safety and Law Enforcement SAR search and rescue SMC SAR mission coordinator Stations (small) seasonally operated detached sub-units of larger parent stations U.S.C. United States Code 9-Step Process Coast Guard’s 9-step station optimization process This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. The published product may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. However, because this work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately. Page iii GAO-18-9 Coast Guard Search and Rescue Letter 441 G St. N.W. Washington, DC 20548 October 26, 2017 The Honorable John Thune Chairman Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation United States Senate Dear Mr. Chairman: The United States Coast Guard (Coast Guard), within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), is the principal federal agency charged with preventing loss of life, injury, and property damage in the maritime environment through its search and rescue (SAR) mission, which it conducts along with 10 other missions including marine environmental protection and drug interdiction.1 To fulfill its SAR responsibilities, along with its other missions, the Coast Guard maintains multimission boat stations, air stations, and air facilities, with associated assets such as boats, helicopters, and fixed wing aircraft, along our coasts and inland waterways.2 While some missions conducted out of these stations, such as ports, waterways, and coastal security, have increased in recent years, annual Coast Guard search and rescue caseloads have decreased from about 32,000 cases per year in 2004 to about 17,000 in 2016, a reduction of 47 percent. The need to balance a broad array of missions, while operating under constrained budgets in recent years, underscores the importance for the Coast Guard to ensure its stations are needed and optimally located.3 1The Coast Guard’s 11 statutory missions are (1) ports, waterways, and coastal security, (2) migrant interdiction, (3) defense readiness, (4) drug interdiction, (5) other law enforcement, (6) search and rescue, (7) living marine resources, (8) aids to navigation, (9) ice operations, (10) marine environmental protection, and (11) marine safety. 6 U.S.C. § 468(a). 2The Coast Guard refers to its stations as multimission because of the various missions performed out of these stations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Online" Application the Candidates Need to Logon to the Website and Click Opportunity Button and Proceed As Given Below
    1 JOIN INDIAN COAST GUARD (MINISTRY OF DEFENCE) AS NAVIK (GENERAL DUTY) 10+2 ENTRY - 02/2020 BATCH APPLICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED ‘ONLINE’ FROM 26 JAN TO 02 FEB 2020 1. Applications are invited from male Indian nationals possessing educational qualifications and age as prescribed below, for recruitment to the post of Navik (General Duty) in the Indian Coast Guard, an Armed Force of the Union. 2. Educational Qualification. 10+2 passed with Maths and Physics from an education board recognised by Central/State Government with minimum 50% aggregate marks. (5 % relaxation in minimum cut off will be given for SC/ST candidates and outstanding sports personnel of National level who have obtained Ist , IInd or IIIrd position in any field sports events at the Open National Championship/ Inter-state National Championship. 3. Age. Minimum 18 Years and maximum 22 years i.e. born between 01 Aug 1998 to 31 Jul 2002 (both dates inclusive). Upper age relaxation of 5 years for SC/ST and 3 years for OBC candidates. 4. Pay, Perks and Others Benefits. On joining Indian Coast Guard, you will be placed in Basic pay of Rs. 21700/- (Pay Level-3) plus Dearness Allowance and other allowances based on nature of duty/place of posting as per the prevailing regulations. 5. Vacancy. The total post for Navik (GD) 02/2020 batch is 260 (approximately). UR(GEN) EWS OBC ST SC Total 113 26 75 13 33 260 Note: - These vacancies are tentative and may change depending on availability of training slots. 6. Promotion and Perquisites. (a) Promotion prospects exist upto the rank of Pradhan Adhikari with pay scale Rs.
    [Show full text]
  • How Best to Respond? Expert Meeting Djibuti, 8-10 November 2011
    RefugeesRefugees andand asylumasylum--seekersseekers inin distressdistress atat seasea –– howhow bestbest toto respondrespond?? ExpertExpert meetingmeeting DjibutiDjibuti,, 88--1010 NovemberNovember 20112011 AUTHORITIES INVOLVED IN RESCUE AT SEA Central Directorate Strategic Coordination Navy Navy CoCoastast Guard Operational guidance in high seas Operational guidance for S.A.R. events Guardia di Finanza Police & Carabinieri Operational guidance in territorial waters Close shore line patrolling PrincipalPrincipal FlowsFlows towardstowards ItalyItaly From TUNISIA EGADI ISLANDS TUNISI TUNISIA LINOSA LAMPEDUSA SOUSSE MADIJA * Up to 5 November DATA ON LANDINGS YEARS LANDINGS MEN WOMEN MINOR TOTAL 2009 39 391 1 7 399 2010 51 560 2 52 614 2011* 512 26.682 235 1.102 28.019** **Landing in Lampedusa 25.714 Landing in Linosa 429 In 2011 have been arrested 73 smugglers and facilitators and 337 boats have been confiscated. In the 2010, were arrested only 7 persons and 19 boats were confiscated. Modus Operandi from Tunisia • By zodiac or wooden boat, of about 4 to 15 meters in length with 3 to 279 persons aboard (on a boat of 12 meters in length) • By fishing boats of 15/25 meters in length (maximum 344 persons aboard a boat of 15 meters in length) • Principally young males • Many trips are self-organized • Nocturnal departure • The cost is about 1,500/2,000 dinars • The Tunisians, generally, claim to want to reach northern Europe From LIBYA SICILY LINOSA LAMPEDUSA TRIPOLI ZUARA MISRATAH LIBYA * Up to 26 may DATA ON LANDINGS YEARS LANDINGS MEN WOMEN MINOR TOTAL 2009 55 4,928 896 466 6,290 2010 9 279 10 57 346 2011* 99 23.137 3.016 1.985 28.318 In 2011 have been arrested 51 smugglers and facilitators and have been confiscated 60 boats.
    [Show full text]
  • Join Indian Coast Guard (Ministry of Defence) As Navik (General Duty) 10+2 Entry - 02/2018 Batch Application Will Be Accepted ‘Online’ from 24 Dec 17 to 02 Jan 18
    1 JOIN INDIAN COAST GUARD (MINISTRY OF DEFENCE) AS NAVIK (GENERAL DUTY) 10+2 ENTRY - 02/2018 BATCH APPLICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED ‘ONLINE’ FROM 24 DEC 17 TO 02 JAN 18 1. Applications are invited from male Indian nationals possessing educational qualifications and age, as prescribed below, for recruitment to the post of Navik (General Duty) in the Indian Coast Guard, an Armed Force of the Union. 2. Educational Qualification. 10+2 passed with 50% marks aggregate in total and minimum 50% aggregate in Maths and Physics from an education board recognized by Central/State Government. (5 % relaxation in above minimum cut off will be given for SC/ST candidates and outstanding sports person of National level who have obtained 1st, 2nd or 3rd position in any field sports events at the Open National Championship/ Interstate National Championship. This relaxation will also be applicable to the wards of Coast Guard uniform personnel deceased while in service). 3. Age. Minimum 18 Years and maximum 22 years i.e. between 01 Aug 1996 to 31 Jul 2000 (both dates inclusive). Upper age relaxation of 5 years for SC/ST and 3 years for OBC candidates. 4. Pay, Perks and Others Benefits:- On joining Indian Coast Guard, you will be placed in Basic pay Rs. 21700/- (Pay Level-3) plus Dearness Allowance and other allowances based on nature of duty/place of posting as per the regulation enforced time to time. 5. Promotion and Perquisites. (a) Promotion prospects exist up to the rank of Pradhan Adhikari with pay scale Rs. 47600/- (Pay Level 8) with Dearness Allowance.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission-Mare-Liberum
    1 Submission to the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants: pushback practices and their impact on the human rights of migrants by Mare Liberum Mare Liberum is a Berlin based non-profit-association, that monitors the human rights situation in the Aegean Sea with its own ships - mainly of the coast of the Greek island of Lesvos. As independent observers, we conduct research to document and publish our findings about the current situation at the European border. Since March 2020, Mare Liberum has witnessed a dramatic increase in human rights violations in the Aegean, both at sea and on land. Collective expulsions, commonly known as ‘pushbacks’, which are defined under ECHR Protocol N. 4 (Article 4), have been the most common violation we have witnessed in 2020. From March 2020 until the end of December 2020 alone, we counted 321 pushbacks in the Aegean Sea, in which 9,798 people were pushed back. Pushbacks by the Hellenic Coast Guard and other European actors, as well as pullbacks by the Turkish Coast Guard are not a new phenomenon in the Aegean Sea. However, the numbers were significantly lower and it was standard procedure for the Hellenic Coast Guard to rescue boats in distress and bring them to land where they would register as asylum seekers. End of February 2020 the political situation changed dramatically when Erdogan decided to open the borders and to terminate the EU-Turkey deal of 2016 as a political move to create pressure on the EU. Instead of preventing refugees from crossing the Aegean – as it was agreed upon in the widely criticised EU-Turkey deal - reports suggested that people on the move were forced towards the land and sea borders by Turkish authorities to provoke a large number of crossings.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-21-539, COVID-19: the Coast Guard Has Addressed Challenges
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Addressees July 2021 COVID-19 The Coast Guard Has Addressed Challenges, but Could Improve Telework Documentation and Personnel Data GAO-21-539 July 2021 COVID-19 The Coast Guard Has Addressed Challenges, but Could Improve Telework Documentation and Highlights of GAO-21-539, a report to Personnel Data congressional addressees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The Coast Guard is a multi-mission The U.S. Coast Guard took steps to safeguard its personnel during the COVID- maritime military service responsible 19 pandemic by updating its policies and guidance, expanding telework, and for maritime safety, security, and administering COVID-19 vaccines, among other efforts. For example, the Coast environmental protection, among other Guard formed a COVID-19 Crisis Action Team comprising targeted working things. During the pandemic, the Coast groups to address COVID-19-related issues and develop new policies and Guard has faced challenges in guidance. Further, from December 2020 through April 2021, the Coast Guard balancing the need to safeguard its administered vaccines to 35,439 (about 64 percent) of its personnel. personnel with its responsibility to continue missions and operations. Selected U.S. Coast Guard COVID-19 Crisis Action Team Working Groups In response to a CARES Act mandate and congressional requests, GAO reviewed the Coast Guard’s efforts to respond to the pandemic. This report examines (1) the Coast Guard’s actions to reduce the risk of COVID-19 exposure for its personnel; (2) challenges the Coast Guard faced in operating in a pandemic environment and how it addressed them; and (3) the extent to which the Coast Guard has The Coast Guard also took actions to address a variety of challenges posed by collected and maintained valid and the COVID-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Authorization to Disclose Coast Guard Information Form
    AUTHORIZATION TO DISCLOSE COASTGUARD INFORMATION United States Coast Guard Headquarters Commandant (G-MRI) 2100 2nd Street., S.W. Washington, DC 20593-0001 Re: Name: Address: D.O.B.: S.S. No.: Please accept this authorization and provide the information below: I hereby authorize the United States Coast Guard (the “Covered Entity”) to release my information described below to: New Jersey Maritime Pilot and Docking Pilot Commission One Penn Plaza East 9th Floor Newark, New Jersey 07105 (973) 491-7693 Purpose of Disclosure: The documents are being produced in connection with an Application for New Jersey State Docking Pilot license. Documents/Information to be Released: This authorization is limited to obtain applicant’s Coast Guard license and records: Information to be disclosed and provided: ___ Any and all information obtained during any investigation of this applicant; ___ Evidence of current first class pilot’s license or a first class pilot endorsement license issued by the United States Coast Guard; ___ Evidence of current unlimited radar observer’s certificate; ___ Evidence of participation in a United States Department of Transportation required drug screening and testing program; ___ Evidence of a current physical examination by a licensed physician in a manner prescribed by the United States Coast Guard; New Jersey Maritime Pilot and Docking Pilot Commission One Penn Plaza East, 9th Floor Newark, NJ 07105 I understand that the information to be disclosed includes my identity, diagnosis and treatment including but not limited to, ALCOHOL, DRUGS, GENETIC TESTING, BEHAVIORAL OR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, AIDS AND HIV information, as applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • 137733NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. -.. ~ r---~~~--------' • Thru: 3/31/92 U.S. COAST GUARD \ " DIGEST OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ~. L STATISTICS Compiled by (G-OLE -1 ) I I!:'::l, , L~.~Jr CJ" If"\i. .§J~ ;J f I I. '-----_________----1 II I The U.S. Coast Guard's General Digest of Law Enforcement Statistics is published semi-annually. It is distributed primarily within the Coast Guard. It is, however, provided to interested agencies and individuals on request. • This booklet represents the most recent information available for the reported period. Some changes may occasionally be noted for prior year information as cases are reviewed and updated. The information presented herein is compiled, reviewed, and promulgated by the Operational Law Enforcement Division of U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters. To provide comments or ask questions please call (202) 267-1766 (FTS callers use same number without area code). To aid the reader in corresponding with this office, our mailing address is provided below: Commandant (G-OLE-1) USCG Headquarters Room 3110 2100 2nd Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20593-0001 • 137733 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Po in Is of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this nqa '1'%1 material has been granted by U.S. Coast GJard~ ___________ to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS).
    [Show full text]
  • Icelandic Coast Guard Icelandicicelandicicelandic Coastcoastcoast Guardguardguard
    Icelandic Coast Guard IcelandicIcelandicIcelandic CoastCoastCoast GuardGuardGuard CDRCDR GylfiGylfi GeirssonGeirsson Icelandic Coast Guard TheTheThe IcelandicIcelandicIcelandic IntegratedIntegratedIntegrated SystemSystemSystem •• OneOne JointJoint OperationOperation CentreCentre forfor –– CoastCoast GuardGuard OperationOperation •• MonitoringMonitoring ControlControl andand SurveillanceSurveillance (MCS)(MCS) –– GeneralGeneral PolicingPolicing inin thethe IcelandicIcelandic EEZEEZ –– VesselVessel MonitoringMonitoring SystemSystem (VMS)(VMS) –– FisheriesFisheries MonitoringMonitoring CentreCentre (FMC)(FMC) –– MaritimeMaritime TrafficTraffic ServiceService (MTS)(MTS) •• GlobalGlobal MaritimeMaritime DistressDistress andand SafetySafety SystemSystem •• SingleSingle PointPoint ofof ContactContact forfor allall MaritimeMaritime relatedrelated nonotificationstifications –– SchengenSchengen –– PortPort CallCall –– TransitTransit –– SearchSearch andand RescueRescue (SAR)(SAR) –– EmergencyEmergency responseresponse MCS – VMS – FMC – MTS – SAR All integrated into one single centre Icelandic Coast Guard TheTheThe AreaAreaArea ofofof OperationOperationOperation Icelandic Coast Guard TheThe IcelandicIcelandic EEZ.EEZ. AnAn areaarea ofof 754.000754.000 kmkm 22 TheThe NEAFCNEAFC RegulatoryRegulatory AreaArea onon thethe ReykjanesReykjanes ridgeridge CDR G. Geirsson Icelandic Coast Guard TheThe NEAFCNEAFC RegulatoryRegulatory AreaArea EastEast ofof IcelandIceland Icelandic Coast Guard TheThe Icelandic Icelandic SAR SAR area. area. 1,8 1,8 million million
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-21 Canadian Coast Guard Integrated Business and Human
    CRC-developed search and rescue beacon on an inuksuk 2020-21 20XX REPORT TITLE CanadianSubtitle Coast Guard Integrated Business and Human Resource Plan Add yourPublished copyright page by: here if applicable. TABLELOREM OF IPSUM CONTENTS Integrated Business Planning Canadian Coast Guard Message from the Commissioner 4 Fisheries and Oceans Canada DOLORWho We Are SIT And AMET, What We CONSECTETUERDO ADIPISCING5 ELIT, SED DIAM NONUM- Ottawa, Ontario MYOur NIBH Mandate EUISMOD TINCIDUNT UT LAOREET5 DOLORE MAGNA ALIQUAM K1A 0E6 ERATFleet andVOLUTPAT. Integrated Technical Services 6 LOREMFleet IPSUM Operational DOLOR Capability SIT AMET 6 2020-21 Canadian Coast Guard Integrated Ut wisiFleet enim Maintenance ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation 6 Business and Human Resource Plan ullamcorperShore-Based suscipit Asset lobortis Readiness nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo 6 consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in Available on the Web: www.ccg-gcc.gc.ca Fleet Procurement 7 vulputate velit esse molestie consequat Également disponible en français Operational programs and services 8 DFO Aids to Navigation 8 Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ISSN ullamcorperWaterways suscipit Management lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo 8 consequat.Marine DuisCommunications autem vel eum and iriure Traffic dolor in hendreritServices in 9 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada vulputateIcebreaking velit esse Services molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu 10 2020 feugiatEnvironmental nulla facilisis at Response vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio 10 dignissimVessels qui blanditof Concern praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue 11 duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi. Lorem ipsum dolor sit Search and Rescue Program 13 amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy Maritime Security 13 nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam Canadian Coast Guard College (CCG College) 14 erat volutpat.
    [Show full text]
  • HOL - Netherlands NOTES
    HOL - Netherlands NOTES DSC WATCH - Coast stations participating in MF, HF and VHF watch-keeping using digital selective calling techniques DC1 All radio stations are remotely controlled from the Coast Guard Centre in Den Helder (JRCC Den Helder). MED- ADVICE - Stations transmitting medical advice MD1 Medical advice may be obtained from the station Netherlands Coast Guard Radio (PBK) by ships of any nationality. After preliminary call on MF DSC 2187.5 kHz, a working frequency will be indicated to the ship. Medical advice may be obtained from the station Netherlands Coast Guard Radio (PBK) by ships of any nationality. After preliminary announcement on 156.8 MHz (C16), a working channel will be indicated where the ship will be connected to a doctor of the Medical Advice Service. Medical advice may be obtained from the station Netherlands Coast Guard Radio (PBK) by ships of any nationality via INMARSAT using SAC code 32 or 38 (INMARSAT-C or B telex). The ship will be prompted on the procedure or via INMARSAT voice where the ship will be connected to a doctor of the Medical Advice Service. MD2 Receiving frequencies 2045, 2048, 2051, 2054 and 2057 kHz. MD3 Receiving frequency 2520 kHz. RCC’s - Rescue coordination centers (MRCC, RCC, MRSC, JRCC) RC1 The Netherlands Coast Guard (JRCC Den Helder) co-ordinates search and rescue operations within the Netherlands Continental Shelf area and the inshore waters Waddenzee, IJsselmeer, and in Zeeland and Zuid-Holland estuaries. JRCC Den Helder keeps watch as follows: Identification Frequency / Channel Watch schedule C16 H24 002442000 C70 H24 2182 kHz After prior announcement on 2187.5 kHz 002442000 2187.5 kHz H24 H24 424426512 Inmarsat–C Answer back: CGHQ NL Y:\APP\BR\MMS\List4-2011\NOTES NOTES to the List of Coast Stations and Special Service Stations (List IV) - Updated: 1 August 2017 HOL - Netherlands – 1 of 3 During normal radiocommunications the Netherlands Coast Guard will use the call sign “this is Netherlands Coast Guard”.
    [Show full text]
  • NETHERLANDS COASTGUARD (JRCC Den Helder) NEWSLETTER Nr
    NETHERLANDS COASTGUARD (JRCC Den Helder) NEWSLETTER nr. 41E (July 2007) COASTGUARD VHF AND MF/HF TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE LOCATIONS. WEST-TERSCHELLING 53.21'.26"N 005.12'.50"E SCHIERMONNIKOOG 53.28'.32"N 006.09'.19"E Receiving Station MF/HF 2187,5 kHz MF DSC VHF Tx/Rx 2182 kHz Emergency Frequency Aerial direction 345 + Other Coast Guard MF Frequencies Channel 16 and 70 DSC VHF Tx/Rx + Channel 23 for: Navigational warnings, Aerial direction 345 Weather forecasts and Radio Medical Service Channel 16 and 70 DSC + Channel 83 for: Navigational warnings, Weather forecasts and Radio Medical Service HUISDUINEN 52.57'.09"N 004.43'.18"E APPINGEDAM VHF Tx/Rx Waddenzee 53.20'.08"N 006.51'.33"E Aerial direction 000 Channel 16 and 70 DSC Transmitting Station MF/HF + Channel 23 for: Navigational warnings, 2187,5 kHz MF DSC Weather forecasts and Radio Medical Service 2182 kHz Emergency Frequency + Other Coast Guard MF Frequencies NORA VHF Tx/Rx 52.17'.35"N 004.28'.19"E Aerial direction 000 Receiving Station M/HF Channel 16 and 70 DSC 2187,5 kHz MF DSC 2182 kHz Emergency Frequency IJsselmeer + Channel 83 for: Navigational warnings, + Other Coast Guard MF Frequencies Weather forecasts and Radio Medical Service SCHEVENINGEN 52.05'.41"N 004.15'.27"E KORNWERDERZAND Transmitting Station MF/HF 53.04'.09"N 005.20'.18"E 2187,5 kHz MF DSC 2182 kHz Emergency Frequency VHF Tx/Rx 518 kHz Navtex Aerial direction 280 3673 kHz for MF Navigational warnings, Channel 16 and 70 DSC + Weather forecasts + Channel 23 for: Navigational warnings, + Other Coast Guard MF Frequencies
    [Show full text]
  • UK Code of Practice Dan Hook, Ceng, FRINA Overview
    UK Code of Practice Dan Hook, CEng, FRINA Overview • MASS - A maturing Industry • Life before an Industry Code of Practice • Development of the Code of Practice • Contents and development going forwards • Application L3 Proprietary MASS - A maturing Industry, ASV’s experience System of Systems New applications ASV SASS - 2002 ASV FMTD4000 - 2007 ASV C-Cat 4 - 2011 ASV C-Sweep / Thales MMCM - 2017 Larger sizes / OTH / Open Ocean Early R&D Bigger / Faster vessels Business case impact Proof of Principles Increasing complexity / capability Training / Operations / Regulations ~ 14% CAGR in market L3 Proprietary Life before a Code of Practice Took a long time Classification Societies Supplier Plan Expensive Confusion in terminology Requirements Lack of ‘something’ to Risk assessments comply with Operator Plan Coast guard authorities Training plans Unsure of responsibilities Operator Manuals Hard to scale an industry or business this way End Customer Plan Insurers As many questions as answers L3 Proprietary Life with the Code of Practice Single point of reference Supplier Plan Classification Continuous improvement Societies Gives customers something to reference in contracts Operator Plan Coast guard authorities Gives operators something to reference in contracts Working document that can reference and link to End Customer Plan Insurers other codes / guides / rules. Requirements Still not perfect but big improvement Risk assessments Training plans Operator Responsibility Operator Manuals L3 Proprietary Development of Code of Practice UK Maritime Autonomous Systems Regulatory Working Group (MASRWG) Chairmanship of James Fanshawe, support of Maritime UK Combined efforts of approximately 60 people across 30+ organisations Regular meetings, sub-committees and lots of voluntary time. (Huge Thanks!) L3 Proprietary Contents # Topic 1 Foreword Version 2.0 available from Nov 2 Definitions 18.
    [Show full text]