DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Management Plan DULLES CORRIDOR METRORAIL PROJECT EXTENSION TO WIEHLE AVENUE Project Management Plan Submitted to Federal Transit Administration For Construction Submitted by Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority In cooperation with Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority And Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Fairfax County Loudoun County Version 6.0 Final September 2008 Revision Record Version Number Issue Date Approved By 1.0 August 2003 C. Hill 2.0 May 2005 S. Carnaggio 3.0 April 2006 S. Carnaggio 4.0 October 2006 S. Carnaggio 5.0 (draft) November 2006 F. Holly 5.0 September 2007 F. Holly 5.0 revised December 2007 F. Holly 5.0 re-revised January 2008 S. Carnaggio 6.0 (draft) July 2008 S. Carnaggio 6.0 (final) September 2008 S. Carnaggio Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING ......................................................................... 7 2.1 Project Management Structure .............................................................................................. 7 2.2 Partnering .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.3 Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority Organization ............................................... 11 2.3.1 Agency Organization ........................................................................................... 11 2.3.2 Past Experience Managing Federal and Local Grants ......................................... 12 2.3.3 Project Management Organization ...................................................................... 13 2.3.4 Project Management Support Services ................................................................ 22 2.4 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Organization ......................................... 30 2.4.1 WMATA as Technical Advisor ........................................................................... 31 2.4.2 WMATA Deliverables ......................................................................................... 35 2.4.3 WMATA Internal Interfaces ................................................................................ 36 2.5 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation ..................................................... 36 2.6 Virginia Department of Transportation ............................................................................... 36 2.7 Dulles Transit Partners Project Development and Design-Build Organization .................. 38 2.8 Fairfax County ..................................................................................................................... 43 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 44 3.1 Locally Preferred Alternative .............................................................................................. 44 3.2 Phased Construction of the Locally Preferred Alternative .................................................. 46 3.3 Project Overview ................................................................................................................. 46 3.4 Project Status ....................................................................................................................... 46 3.5 Project Management Documents ......................................................................................... 48 3.6 Design-Build Approach ....................................................................................................... 51 3.7 Project Schedule .................................................................................................................. 52 3.8 Project Budget ..................................................................................................................... 56 3.8.1 Financial Plan ...................................................................................................... 56 3.8.2 WMATA Costs .................................................................................................... 58 3.9 Before and After Study ........................................................................................................ 58 3.10 Legal Authority ................................................................................................................... 58 3.11 Project Implementation under the Public-Private Transportation Act ................................ 59 4.0 PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES .................................. 60 4.1 Management Structure ......................................................................................................... 60 4.2 Project Office ...................................................................................................................... 60 4.3 Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................................... 60 4.3.1 Design Development ............................................................................................ 62 4.3.2 Design Review ..................................................................................................... 62 4.3.3 VDOT or WMATA Criteria Deviations .............................................................. 62 4.3.4 Construction Management ................................................................................... 63 4.3.5 Integration Testing, Commissioning, and System Performance Demonstration . 63 4.3.6 System Safety and Security Certification ............................................................ 63 4.3.7 Pre-Revenue Operations ...................................................................................... 63 Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project i Extension to Wiehle Avenue September 2008 Project Management Plan v. 6.0 Final Table of Contents 4.4 Integrated Airports Authority/WMATA Project Management ........................................... 63 4.4.1 WMATA’s Role and Responsibilities ................................................................. 63 4.4.2 Implementation of Integration Project Management ........................................... 65 4.4.3 Airports Authority/WMATA Coordination Meetings and Communications ...... 65 5.0 MANAGEMENT AND PROJECT CONTROLS ....................................................................... 67 5.1 Technical and Scope Control ............................................................................................... 67 5.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control ..................................................................................... 67 5.3 Schedule Control ................................................................................................................. 68 5.4 Progress Payments ............................................................................................................... 69 5.5 Cost Estimating ................................................................................................................... 70 5.6 Cost Control and Job Accounting Systems ......................................................................... 71 5.7 Tracking Federally Eligible Project Costs ........................................................................... 73 5.8 Change Orders and Claims .................................................................................................. 73 5.9 Contingency Management and Control ............................................................................... 73 5.10 Indexing Commodity Cost Controls .................................................................................... 74 5.11 FTA Project Management Oversight ................................................................................... 75 5.12 Document Control ............................................................................................................... 75 5.13 Progress Reporting and Report Management ...................................................................... 76 6.0 LABOR RELATIONS AND POLICY ......................................................................................... 78 6.1 Labor Relations and Policy ................................................................................................. 78 6.2 Wage Rates and Job Classifications .................................................................................... 78 6.3 Wage and Hour Requirements ............................................................................................. 78 6.4 Federal, State, and Local Regulations ................................................................................. 79 6.5 No Strike Agreements ......................................................................................................... 79 6.6 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program ...................................................................... 79 7.0 RISK ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................... 80 7.1 Airports Authority Risk Evaluation ..................................................................................... 80 7.2 Airports Authority Risk Management Plan ......................................................................... 81 7.3 FTA Risk Assessment Process ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jitney Approach for Miami-Dade County, the Publicos System: A
    Miami-Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Prepared by the Metropolitan Planning Organization March 2002 A JITNEY APPROACH FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND………………………………………………………………………….. 2 Tale of Two Areas: San Juan Metropolitan Area (SJMA).……………………………………….. 2 Miami Urbanized Area………………………………………………………….. 3 Trip Schedule………………………………..………………………………….. 3 PRESENTATIONS……………………………………………………………………….. 4 Department of Transportation (PRDOT)…………………………………….. 4 Highway and Transportation Authority (PRHTA)………………………….. 6 Metropolitan Bus Authority (MBA)…….…………………………………….. 8 Public Service Commission (PSC)…………………….…………………….. 9 FIELD TRIPS…….………………………………………………………………………..11 Visiting “Publicos” Facilities…………………………………………………..11 Rio Piedras Terminal………………………………………………………….. 11 Bayamon Terminal…………………………………………………………….. 12 Cataño Terminal………………………………………….…………………….. 13 “Tren Urbano”…………………………………………….…………………….. 14 HIGHLIGHTS…..…………………………………………………………………………..15 OBSERVATIONS…..…………………………………………………………………….. 16 RECOMMENDATIONS.…………………………………………………………………..18 LIST OF APPENDICES ………………………………..….……………………………..19 “A”: “Publicos” Study - Scope of Work “B”: Trip Agenda “C”: List of Participants “D”: Publicos’ Presentation - PRDOT 3 BACKGROUND On January 28, 2002, the MPO Governing Board Puerto Rico’s fixed-route, semi-scheduled owner- under Resolution # 10-02 authorized a trip to San operated and demand responsive “publico” passenger Juan, Puerto Rico, for the MPO Board Members and transportation system is unique within the territorial staff
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Products
    TRANSIT PRODUCTS ™ YOUR TOTAL TRACK MANAGEMENT COMPANY ® CXT® Concrete Ties lbfoster.com L.B. FOSTER TRANSIT PRODUCTS L.B. Foster provides transit solutions that can be customized to meet your specific requirements and schedule. Our products and services are in use worldwide in heavy rail and light rail transit systems. We offer direct fixation fastener and contact rail systems. Our bonded and non- bonded fasteners provide the best balance for noise and vibration dampening, electrical isolation and ease of installation. L.B. Foster’s systems can be utilized in turnouts, crossings, expansion joints, restraining rails and many other applications. Our contact rail systems can include steel, aluminum or steel/aluminum clad rails and be offered as complete installation packages with insulators, coverboard systems, end approaches, anchors and other appurtenances. L.B. Foster provides embedded track systems for concrete, asphalt or grass applications. Our rail boot systems offer resilient solutions to protect track structure and provide electrical isolation and noise/vibration dampening. L.B. Foster has a protective boot to fit any rail section and the accessories to support your custom solution. Our full line of accessories includes steel or composite leveling beams, splice cuffs, rail clip systems, fabricated steel plates and miscellaneous installation material. L.B. Foster Engineering Expertise L.B. Foster can also be counted on to engineer and test custom solutions specific to your own unique requirements. Our innovative Transit Products R&D facility in Suwanee, GA is state-of-the-art rail products lab designed specifically for the transit market. The laboratory’s trained technicians can perform static, fatigue, electrical and environmental tests to simulate application conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical
    METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL
    [Show full text]
  • Informe Final Evolución Del Plan Maestro Y Las Extensiones Al Tren Urbano
    Programa de Desarrollo Profesional UPR/PUPR/ATI División Grupo PUPR Informe Final Evolución del Plan Maestro y las Extensiones al Tren Urbano Mentores: Prof. Amado Vélez Gallego, M.S.C.E., P.E. [email protected] Prof. Felipe Luyanda Villafañe, Dr.Eng., P.E. [email protected] Gustavo E. Pacheco Crosetti, Ph. D., P.E. [email protected] Sometido por: Carlos J. Rodríguez Bury [email protected] Universidad Politécnica de Puerto Rico Ave. Ponce de León, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico Departamento de Ingeniería Civil y Ambiental 17 de mayo de 2008 Prefacio Esta investigación consiste en el estudio de la evolución del plan maestro del Tren Urbano (PMTU), desde sus comienzos en la década del 1960 hasta el presente y las extensiones del mismo hoy día. Se desarrollo una recopilación de información de los estudios previos seleccionados al plan maestro del tren urbano (TU) y sus extensiones, de manera de proveer una sola fuente en la cual la comunidad profesional y el gobierno puedan ver las diferentes ideas asociadas al TU en un solo documento. 2 Tabla de Contenido 1. Introducción .................................................................................. 4 1.1 Tema de Investigación ................................................................................ 4 1.3 Objetivo y Alcance ....................................................................................... 5 1.4 Metodología ................................................................................................. 6 2. Evolución del PMTU Década 1960-1969 ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: a Literature Review
    Transit Cooperative Research Program Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration RESEARCH RESULTS DIGEST October 2002—Number 52 Subject Area: VI Public Transit Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review This digest summarizes the literature review of TCRP Project H-27, “Transit-Oriented Development: State of the Practice and Future Benefits.” This digest provides definitions of transit-oriented development (TOD) and transit joint development (TJD), describes the institutional issues related to TOD and TJD, and provides examples of the impacts and benefits of TOD and TJD. References and an annotated bibliography are included. This digest was written by Robert Cervero, Christopher Ferrell, and Steven Murphy, from the Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley. CONTENTS IV.2 Supportive Public Policies: Finance and Tax Policies, 46 I INTRODUCTION, 2 IV.3 Supportive Public Policies: Land-Based I.1 Defining Transit-Oriented Development, 5 Initiatives, 54 I.2 Defining Transit Joint Development, 7 IV.4 Supportive Public Policies: Zoning and I.3 Literature Review, 9 Regulations, 57 IV.5 Supportive Public Policies: Complementary II INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, 10 Infrastructure, 61 II.1 The Need for Collaboration, 10 IV.6 Supportive Public Policies: Procedural and II.2 Collaboration and Partnerships, 12 Programmatic Approaches, 61 II.3 Community Outreach, 12 IV.7 Use of Value Capture, 66 II.4 Government Roles, 14
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Introduction and Background
    A GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS OF AIR HUBS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA HAN SONGGUANG (B. Soc. Sci. (Hons.)), NUS A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2007 A Geographical Analysis of Air Hubs in Southeast Asia ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It seemed like not long ago when I started out on my undergraduate degree at the National University of Singapore and here I am at the conclusion of my formal education. The decision to pursue this Masters degree was not a straightforward and simple one. Many sacrifices had to be made as a result but I am glad to have truly enjoyed and benefited from this fulfilling journey. This thesis, in many ways, is the culmination of my academic journey, one fraught with challenges but also laden with rewards. It also marks the start of a new chapter of my life where I leave the comfortable and sheltered confines of the university into the “outside world” and my future pursuit of a career in education. I would like to express my heartfelt thanks and gratitude to the following people, without whom this thesis would not have been possible: I am foremost indebted to Associate Professor K. Raguraman who first inspired me in the wonderful field of transport geography from the undergraduate modules I did under him. His endearing self, intellectual guidance, critical comments and helpful suggestions have been central to the completion of this thesis. A special word of thanks to you Ragu, my supervisor, mentor, inspiration and friend. All faculty members at the Department of Geography, NUS who have taught me (hopefully well enough!) during my undergraduate and postgraduate days in the university and enabled me to see the magic behind the discipline that is Geography.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility of Implementing a PR-181 Busway in the Trujillo Alto Area An
    Feasibility of Implementing a PR-181 Busway in the Trujillo Alto Area An Interactive Qualifying Project Submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science Submitted by John Benigno Eric Gebrian Kevin Reidy Michael Seabrook Submitted to Project Advisors Prof. J. Scott Jiusto Prof. Lauren Mathews Project Liaisons, Autoridad de Carreteras y Transportacion Mr. Gabriel Rodríguez Fernández Mrs. Martha Bravo Colunga Date: May 5, 2005 [email protected] i Executive Summary The metropolitan region of San Juan, Puerto Rico is struggling with the integration of the mass transportation system and the surrounding municipalities. The problem facing San Juan is very complex, ranging from unsafe and inadequate pedestrian ways, to an under-developed mass transit system. These conditions lower the quality of life throughout the region, making it difficult for people to enjoy the area. The municipality of Trujillo Alto is one such area that is facing these problems. The implementation of a dedicated bus lane, or Busway, along the PR-181 corridor of Trujillo Alto is a possible starting point for an overall solution. The goal of this study is to identify issues relevant to the implementation of a Busway along the PR-181 corridor of Trujillo Alto and develop preliminary concepts for its design. Understanding potential issues that could arise with the construction of a Busway, is critical in the planning and design process. These issues impact the physical design of the system, modifications and/or reconstruction of roadways, price of the project, potential ridership, and overall time for completion of project.
    [Show full text]
  • KLIA-Airport-Guide-02072018.Pdf
    If you are at KLIA and not sure where to go, don’t worry, I will guide you! Advance Check-In No Baggage Check-In** Check in your baggage as early No baggage? Just proceed as 8 hours before the scheduled to the boarding gate. departure. Web Check-In* Self Check-In** 1) Log on to the airline’s website. Common Use Self-Service (CUSS) Kiosks are available for your 2) Provide confirmation number. check-in for most major airlines. 3) Print your boarding pass. Check-In 3 Mobile Check-In** Normal Airport Check-In Baggage 4 Check in using mobile check-in Check-in counters for most via website or app. If you have airlines open 3 hours before Transit & Transfer 5 baggage, you may skip the your scheduled departure, and counter queue and drop it at the close an hour before your flight Transport 6-7 baggage drop-off counter. takes off. Facilities & Services 8-13 Shop, Dine & Relax 14-17 Flight Information Directory 18-28 Check-in counters open 3 hours before your scheduled departure and close an hour before your flight takes off. * Do check with your airline to confirm that this service is available. ** You must be on a domestic flight (within Malaysia) or between Just flip on through Kuala Lumpur and Singapore. 2 3 International Passengers International Connecting Flights Proceed directly to departure hall with your boarding pass. Domestic Connecting Flights Proceed through Customs and Immigration before departure with your boarding pass. Prohibited Baggage Items Prohibited items vary from country to country. Connecting Flights WITHOUT Boarding Pass Please check with airline ground staff if you are uncertain Proceed to your airline check-in counter before departure.
    [Show full text]
  • ASIA-PACIFIC CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION FORUM 2014, 1 – 3 OCTOBER 2014 PWTC 1 Transportation Between Airports and Putra World T
    ASIA-PACIFIC CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION FORUM 2014, 1 – 3 OCTOBER 2014 PWTC Transportation between Airports and Putra World Trade Centre (PWTC) 1. KUALA LUMPUR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (KLIA) Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) is the main aviation hub in Malaysia. It is located in Sepang district, in the southern part of the state of Selangor bordering Negeri Sembilan, approximately 50 km from the capital city, Kuala Lumpur. Most international flights arrive at Terminal C which is located at the Satellite Building of KLIA. An aerotrain provides a complimentary shuttle service for passengers between the Main Terminal Building and the Satellite Building every 3 – 5 minutes. The aerotrain takes just about 2 minutes to travel into a tunnel that runs underneath an airport taxiway and into the Satellite Building. For more information about KLIA, please visit the following link www.klia.com.my Please take note of the options for transportation from the KLIA to the forum venue, PWTC, and back to KLIA. Please note that travel duration may vary depending on intermediated stop and traffic conditions. Option 1: Airport Taxi / Limo Upon arrival at the KLIA, the authorised airport taxi counters can be found at the Arrival Hall, Main Terminal Building after Customs, before the public arrival waiting area. If you disembark at the Satellite Building or the Terminal C, please take the aerotrain to reach the Main Terminal Building. The airport taxi service is operated by Airport Limo (M) Sdn. Bhd. Taxi fares are charged according to destination and the type of taxi or limo required. There are 4 types of airport taxi available to choose from: Type of Taxi / Limo Capacity (depending on the car model) Budget Taxi 3 – 4 passengers only Premier Limo 4 to 5 passengers only Super Luxury 3 passengers only Family Service 8 passengers only Source: www.klia.com.my Please tell the person in charge your destination (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • ACI-HERZOG Tren Urbano Project
    ACI-HERZOG Tren Urbano Project Transit Asset Management Plan 2020 Department and Division: Issue Date: Engineering and Development Department May 27, 2020 Revision: Rev. 1, May/2020 Supersedes: Rev. 0 / 2017 ACI-HERZOG Approvals Prepared by: _______________________________ Revised by: _______________________________ Approved by: _______________________________ Approval Date: ______________________________ Date Recommended for release by QA/QC: ______________________________ ____________________ _____________ Print Name Signature Date Document Control List Transit Assets Management Plan Page 2 of 49 Rev. 1, May/2020 ACI-HERZOG Revision Date Description 0 January/2017 Initial Issuance Updates to plan and SOPs in accordance with the March 2018 TAM Facility Performance Measure Reporting Guidebook and the April 1 May/2020 2017 TAM Infrastructure Performance Measure Reporting Guidebook. List of Attachments Attachment Rev. No. Subject Appendix 1 1/2020 Asset Performance Targets (2019 NTD Narrative Report) 0/2018 Asset Condition Assessment Procedures: Appendix 2 PM-01-02 - NTD Performance Restriction (Slow Zone Calculation) 1/2020 PM-01-03 - NTD Facilities Condition Assessment Calculation Appendix 3 0/2017 Level of Service and Performance Measures Appendix 4 1/2020 Project Prioritization List Transit Assets Management Plan Page 3 of 49 Rev. 1, May/2020 ACI-HERZOG TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Macton In-Ground Car Hoist Installations
    List of Macton In-Ground Car Hoist Installations Transit System Type of Hoist System Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Rosemount Basement Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Howard Basement Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Skokie C-Frame Basement Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART), Central Rail Operating Facility Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Denver Regional Trans. District (RTD), Mariposa Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands L.A. County Metropolitan Trans. Auth., Long Beach Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands L.A. County Metropolitan Trans. Auth., Hawthorn Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Long Island Rail Road, Hillside C-Frame Basement Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Long Island Rail Road, West Side Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Maryland Transportation Authority, Wabash Deep Pit Car Hoist with Portable Body Stands Maryland Transportation Authority, Wabash Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Maryland Transportation Authority, North Ave. Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), Riverside Hydraulic Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), Reservoir St. Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), Riverside Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Metro-Dade Transportation Admin., Lehman Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Metronorth Railroad, South Park Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Metronorth Railroad, North White Plains Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Metronorth Railroad, Stamford Deep Pit Car Hoist with Portable Body Stands Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA), Avondale Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB), El Cajon Shallow Pit Body Hoist New Jersey Transit, Hudson/Bergen Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands PATH - New Jersey, Harrison Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Portable Body Stands Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), St.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit of the Tren Urbano Rail Transit Project
    AUDIT OF THE TREN URBANO RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT Federal Transit Administration Report Number: MH-2004-098 Date Issued: September 29, 2004 Memorandum U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation Office of Inspector General Subject: ACTION: Report on the Follow-Up Audit of the Date: September 29, 2004 Tren Urbano Rail Transit Project Federal Transit Administration MH-2004-098 From: Alexis M. Stefani Reply to Attn. of: JA-40 Principal Assistant Inspector General for Auditing and Evaluation To: Federal Transit Administrator This report presents the results of our third audit of the Tren Urbano Rail Transit Project (Tren Urbano) in San Juan, Puerto Rico. We are providing our findings and recommendations to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), so it may resolve the issues identified in this report before making further Federal funding decisions concerning Tren Urbano. Tren Urbano is being constructed by the Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority (PRHTA). It is a 10.7-mile (17.2 km) fixed-guideway rail transit system that will serve existing and projected development within San Juan’s metropolitan area. Tren Urbano will include 16 stations, a vehicle maintenance and storage facility, 74 rail cars, operations control center, traction power, train control, and communications systems. The project is expected to provide a solution to the continually rising vehicle traffic levels and bring a new mode of transportation to the most congested sections of the San Juan metropolitan area. Since 1990, the number of registered vehicles in Puerto Rico has increased at an average annual rate of 2.89 percent; this is 2.13 percent more than the population growth rate.
    [Show full text]