January 2005 Bulletin.Pub

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

January 2005 Bulletin.Pub TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - JANUARY, 2005 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 48, No. 1 January, 2005 The Bulletin ANOTHER CENTENNIAL— Published by the New York Division, Electric ORIGINAL SUBWAY EXTENDED TO FULTON STREET Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box One hundred years ago, January 16, 1905, subsurface structures, and the high buildings. 3001, New York, New New York’s first subway was extended 0.3 The biggest engineering problem of Contract York 10008-3001. miles to Fulton Street. Trains were probably Two was the construction of the subway in single-tracked on the northbound track. front of Trinity Church. The 286-foot-high For general inquiries, When the original subway was planned, Trinity Church spire rested on a shallow ma- contact us at nydiv@ there was not enough money available to sonry foundation built on a deep layer of fine electricrailroaders.org or extend it south of City Hall. With $8 million sand. This foundation was located nine feet by phone at (212) 986- available in January, 1901, the Board of laterally behind the exterior wall of the sub- 4482 (voice mail available). ERA’s Rapid Transit Railroad Commissioners way. The bottom of the spire foundation was website is planned an extension to Atlantic Avenue in nine feet below the street, fifteen feet higher www.electricrailroaders. Brooklyn. August Belmont was the low bidder than the 24-foot-deep subway foundation. org. for Contract Two, which was awarded on The 57 feet of subway bordering the Trinity Editorial Staff: September 11, 1902. This contract specified Church foundation was constructed in three Editor-in-Chief: that traffic on the streets of lower Manhattan sections. Steel channels were used as sheet Bernard Linder could not be disrupted. Traffic was so heavy piling around the subway excavation. These News Editor: that it was necessary to maintain the street steel channels were left in place after the Randy Glucksman Contributing Editor: surface in a condition suitable for ordinary construction was completed to prevent settle- Jeffrey Erlitz traffic in the daytime. ment from voids created by removing the The contractor complied by making open- sheet piling. No measurable movement of the Production Manager: ings in the sidewalk at two points near the spire occurred during or after construction. David Ross curb and erecting temporary platforms over Experience gained in excavating for Con- the street, 16 feet above the sidewalk. These tract One allowed the engineers to proceed excavations were made by the drift and tun- faster. Planking on lower Broadway permitted nel method. The excavated material was uninterrupted excavation and construction hoisted from the openings to the platforms with hardly any interruption of traffic. ©2005 New York and dropped through the chutes to the wag- Under Contract One, the entire street was Division, Electric ons. Until the street surface was restored, excavated, usually one side at a time, and Railroaders’ temporary plank decks were placed and work was performed in an open cut nick- Association, Incorporated maintained during the drifting and tunneling named Parson’s Ditch, using hand labor, operations. Because the roof of the subway horse-drawn carts, steam hoists, and drills. In This Issue: is only five feet below the surface of the When the work was completed, the excava- A Small street, gas and water mains were relocated tion was backfilled and the street was paved. on temporary trestle structures above the Temporary wood bridges spanned the open Company sidewalk. They were placed in their former cut. Controls a position when construction was completed. Street car tracks were supported on tempo- Large Trolley The contractor had difficulty building this rary trestles while work was progressing. Network section because of the sandy subsurface, the Trenches were dug at 40-foot intervals trans- ...Page 2 vehicular and street car traffic, the network of (Continued on page 3) 1 NEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - OCTOBER,JANUARY, 20002005 A SMALL COMPANY CONTROLS A LARGE TROLLEY NETWORK by Bernard Linder NORTH MOUNT VERNON RAILWAY COMPANY from the Bronx River (near Pelham Parkway in the This small company was the predecessor to the Inter- Bronx) to the Connecticut line, but was able to build urban Street Railway, which controlled nearly all the only 700 feet of track, on which it never operated any trolley lines in Manhattan, the Bronx, and Westchester cars. It was unable to perform any additional construc- County. tion until 1899 because it was in continued litigation. The North Mount Vernon Railway Company, which The company then bought at foreclosure the North was incorporated April 20, 1892, built two miles of track Mount Vernon Railway and started operating it on Janu- in Mount Vernon, similar to the route of the present-day ary 16, 1900. It relinquished its track to the Interurban Route 40 bus, described as follows: From New Haven Street Railway on December 9, 1901 by filing a deed of station via North 3rd Avenue, Oakley Avenue, North 4th disclaimer as to rights that were formerly possessed by Avenue, East Lincoln Avenue, and North Columbus North Mount Vernon, after which Interurban acquired Avenue to Burke’s Corners. The company started op- the property through a complicated transaction de- eration with battery cars, which wee unsuccessful and scribed above. William W. Ladd was appointed receiver were replaced by horse cars two years later. The com- on August 1, 1908. pany never made a profit. When it failed to make a re- A 1909 inspection revealed that the line, which was port in 1897, it was reported to the Attorney General as built with 7-inch girder rail, was plagued with frequent delinquent, and operations were suspended. The com- derailments because of the poor alignment of the pany was sold at foreclosure for $15,000 at White tracks. The poles were rotted, the span wires were at- Plains on February 26, 1898, and was incorporated tached to trees, and the overhead was so low that it again on April 16, 1898. was a hazard to traffic. INTERURBAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY On April 29, 1909, the receiver sold the property — This company, which was incorporated on November 1.52 miles of trolley line in Mount Vernon, two cars, 25, 1901, is substantially a reorganization of the North tracks, and a tumble-down car house. It was sold at Mount Vernon Railway Company. foreclosure at the White Plains Court House to John On November 29, 1901, the company took a lease of Johnston of Brooklyn, evidently acting for Westchester the property and franchise of the Peoples Traction interests. He paid $500 subject to $25,000 unpaid fran- Company, whose routes were unconstructed. chise taxes and other claims that judgment creditors of On February 14, 1902, the company took a lease of all New York City Railway had filed. the lines controlled by the Metropolitan Street Railway In 1910, the owners refused to pay $16,000 in back Company for a period of 999 years. Interurban was in taxes. If the city accepted, they were willing to pay substantial control of the entire street surface railway $10,000 give free transfers, and repair the road. The system in Manhattan, the Bronx, and the southern part indebtedness was about $31,000. of Westchester County with the exception of the surface Johnston conveyed the property to the New York, railway from the Bartow station to City Island. Westchester & Connecticut in a deed dated May 1, Under this lease, the company agreed to furnish the 1912, but continued operating it until July 13, 1912, af- lessor $23 million to pay the latter company’s debt, and ter which the company continued as a Third Avenue to pay a rental of seven percent per annum on Metro- Railway paper subsidiary (without a railroad). Although politan’s capital stock, which was worth $52 million. the tracks on Lawton Street from Main Street to Hugue- About the time this lease was made, this company’s not Street and on Fifth Avenue, New Rochelle were entire capital stock was acquired by the Metropolitan owned by New York, Westchester & Connecticut, the Securities Company, a holding company incorporated cars were operated by Westchester Electric. on February 14, 1902. The subsidiary, whose two lines — F/Mount Vernon- On February 10, 1904, the company’s name was Tuckahoe and G/Pelham — were converted to bus in changed to New York City Railway Company. the early 1930s, was leased to the Westchester Street On September 24, 1907, Adrian H. Joline and Doug- Transportation Company on November 11, 1936. From las Robinson were appointed receivers. To separate the 1932 to 1936, buses 534-539 were listed as owned and interest of the two companies, William W. Ladd was operated by the New York, Westchester & Connecticut appointed receiver on August 1, 1908. Traction Company. They were not kept separate, but NEW YORK, WESTCHESTER & CONNECTI- were operated on most Westchester County bus lines. CUT TRACTION COMPANY During the 1930s, the same transfer was apparently This company, which was incorporated on February issued on both lines. The line was not listed, but the 12, 1895, intended to built a trolley line on Boston Road (Continued on page 3) 2 NEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - JANUARY, 2005 A Small Company Controls a Large Trolley Network 1942. (We do not have the names of the subsidiaries.) Subsequently they were formally merged into the West- (Continued from page 2) chester Street Transportation Company. Checking the transfer was labeled, “New York, Westchester, and Con- transfers, we find that New York, Westchester & Con- necticut Traction Company.” Among the transfer points necticut still issued transfers on July 18, 1942. The Pel- was, “At Columbus and East Lincoln Avenues to Pel- ham line transfer dated May 18, 1943 indicated that the ham or Tuckahoe bus.” Westchester Street Transportation Company was the The 1942 Moody’s Transportation Manual states owner.
Recommended publications
  • Jitney Approach for Miami-Dade County, the Publicos System: A
    Miami-Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Prepared by the Metropolitan Planning Organization March 2002 A JITNEY APPROACH FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND………………………………………………………………………….. 2 Tale of Two Areas: San Juan Metropolitan Area (SJMA).……………………………………….. 2 Miami Urbanized Area………………………………………………………….. 3 Trip Schedule………………………………..………………………………….. 3 PRESENTATIONS……………………………………………………………………….. 4 Department of Transportation (PRDOT)…………………………………….. 4 Highway and Transportation Authority (PRHTA)………………………….. 6 Metropolitan Bus Authority (MBA)…….…………………………………….. 8 Public Service Commission (PSC)…………………….…………………….. 9 FIELD TRIPS…….………………………………………………………………………..11 Visiting “Publicos” Facilities…………………………………………………..11 Rio Piedras Terminal………………………………………………………….. 11 Bayamon Terminal…………………………………………………………….. 12 Cataño Terminal………………………………………….…………………….. 13 “Tren Urbano”…………………………………………….…………………….. 14 HIGHLIGHTS…..…………………………………………………………………………..15 OBSERVATIONS…..…………………………………………………………………….. 16 RECOMMENDATIONS.…………………………………………………………………..18 LIST OF APPENDICES ………………………………..….……………………………..19 “A”: “Publicos” Study - Scope of Work “B”: Trip Agenda “C”: List of Participants “D”: Publicos’ Presentation - PRDOT 3 BACKGROUND On January 28, 2002, the MPO Governing Board Puerto Rico’s fixed-route, semi-scheduled owner- under Resolution # 10-02 authorized a trip to San operated and demand responsive “publico” passenger Juan, Puerto Rico, for the MPO Board Members and transportation system is unique within the territorial staff
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Into Reliability of the Jubilee Line
    Investigation into Reliability: London Underground Jubilee Line An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science By Jack Arnis Agolli Marianna Bailey Errando Berwin Jayapurna Yiannis Kaparos Date: 26 April 2017 Report Submitted to: Malcolm Dobell CPC Project Services Professors Rosenstock and Hall-Phillips Worcester Polytechnic Institute This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects. Abstract Metro systems are often faced with reliability issues; specifically pertaining to safety, accessibility, train punctuality, and stopping accuracy. The project goal was to assess the reliability of the London Underground’s Jubilee Line and the systems implemented during the Jubilee Line extension. The team achieved this by interviewing train drivers and Transport for London employees, surveying passengers, validating the stopping accuracy of the trains, measuring dwell times, observing accessibility and passenger behavior on platforms with Platform Edge Doors, and overall train performance patterns. ii Acknowledgements We would currently like to thank everyone who helped us complete this project. Specifically we would like to thank our sponsor Malcolm Dobell for his encouragement, expert advice, and enthusiasm throughout the course of the project. We would also like to thank our contacts at CPC Project Services, Gareth Davies and Mehmet Narin, for their constant support, advice, and resources provided during the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--History History 2016 Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945 Danielle K. Dodson University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.339 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dodson, Danielle K., "Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--History. 40. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/history_etds/40 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the History at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--History by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Products
    TRANSIT PRODUCTS ™ YOUR TOTAL TRACK MANAGEMENT COMPANY ® CXT® Concrete Ties lbfoster.com L.B. FOSTER TRANSIT PRODUCTS L.B. Foster provides transit solutions that can be customized to meet your specific requirements and schedule. Our products and services are in use worldwide in heavy rail and light rail transit systems. We offer direct fixation fastener and contact rail systems. Our bonded and non- bonded fasteners provide the best balance for noise and vibration dampening, electrical isolation and ease of installation. L.B. Foster’s systems can be utilized in turnouts, crossings, expansion joints, restraining rails and many other applications. Our contact rail systems can include steel, aluminum or steel/aluminum clad rails and be offered as complete installation packages with insulators, coverboard systems, end approaches, anchors and other appurtenances. L.B. Foster provides embedded track systems for concrete, asphalt or grass applications. Our rail boot systems offer resilient solutions to protect track structure and provide electrical isolation and noise/vibration dampening. L.B. Foster has a protective boot to fit any rail section and the accessories to support your custom solution. Our full line of accessories includes steel or composite leveling beams, splice cuffs, rail clip systems, fabricated steel plates and miscellaneous installation material. L.B. Foster Engineering Expertise L.B. Foster can also be counted on to engineer and test custom solutions specific to your own unique requirements. Our innovative Transit Products R&D facility in Suwanee, GA is state-of-the-art rail products lab designed specifically for the transit market. The laboratory’s trained technicians can perform static, fatigue, electrical and environmental tests to simulate application conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical
    METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL
    [Show full text]
  • MTA HOMELESS OUTREACH Long Island Rail Road Metro-North
    Meeting of Long Island and Metro- North Committees October 2018 Members M. Pally, Chair, LIRR Committee S. Metzger, Chair MNR Committee N. Brown R. Glucksman I. Greenberg C. Moerdler S. Rechler A. Saul V. Tessitore V. Vanterpool J. Vitiello C. Wortendyke N. Zuckerman Joint Metro-North and Long Island Committees Meeting 2 Broadway 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY Monday, 10/22/2018 8:30 - 10:00 AM ET 1. Public Comments Period 2. Approval of Minutes - September 24, 2018 LIRR Minutes LIRR Minutes - Page 5 MNR Minutes MNR Minutes - Page 14 3. 2018 Work Plans 2018 LIRR Work Plan 2018 LIRR Work Plan - Page 25 2018 MNR Work Plan 2018 MNR Work Plan - Page 32 4. PRESIDENT'S REPORT LIRR Safety Report LIRR Safety Report - Page 39 MNR Safety Report MNR Safety Report - Page 43 MTA Capital Construction Report MTA Capital Construction Report - Page 46 MTA Police Report MTA Police Report - Page 50 5. AGENCY INFORMATION ITEMS Joint Information Items 2019 Preliminary Budget (Public Comment) MTA Homeless Outreach MTA Homeless Outreach - Page 62 LIRR/MNR PTC Project Update LIRR/MNR PTC Project Update - Page 67 LIRR Information Items November Timetable Change & Trackwork Programs November Timetable Change & Trackwork Programs - Page 84 Bi-Annual Report on M-9 Procurement Bi-Annual Report on M-9 Procurement - Page 87 MNR Information Items Track Program Quarterly Update Track Program Quarterly Update - Page 103 6. PROCUREMENTS LIRR Procurements LIRR Procurements - Page 117 Non-Competitive (No Items) Competitive LIRR Competitive - Page 121 Ratifications LIRR Ratifications - Page 128 MNR Procurements MNR Procurements - Page 129 Non-Competitive MNR Non-Competitive Procurements - Page 133 Competitive (No Items) Ratifications (No Items) MTA CC Procurements MTA CC Procurements - Page 135 Non-Competitive (No Items) Competitive MTA CC Competitive - Page 138 Ratifications (No Items) 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Informe Final Evolución Del Plan Maestro Y Las Extensiones Al Tren Urbano
    Programa de Desarrollo Profesional UPR/PUPR/ATI División Grupo PUPR Informe Final Evolución del Plan Maestro y las Extensiones al Tren Urbano Mentores: Prof. Amado Vélez Gallego, M.S.C.E., P.E. [email protected] Prof. Felipe Luyanda Villafañe, Dr.Eng., P.E. [email protected] Gustavo E. Pacheco Crosetti, Ph. D., P.E. [email protected] Sometido por: Carlos J. Rodríguez Bury [email protected] Universidad Politécnica de Puerto Rico Ave. Ponce de León, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico Departamento de Ingeniería Civil y Ambiental 17 de mayo de 2008 Prefacio Esta investigación consiste en el estudio de la evolución del plan maestro del Tren Urbano (PMTU), desde sus comienzos en la década del 1960 hasta el presente y las extensiones del mismo hoy día. Se desarrollo una recopilación de información de los estudios previos seleccionados al plan maestro del tren urbano (TU) y sus extensiones, de manera de proveer una sola fuente en la cual la comunidad profesional y el gobierno puedan ver las diferentes ideas asociadas al TU en un solo documento. 2 Tabla de Contenido 1. Introducción .................................................................................. 4 1.1 Tema de Investigación ................................................................................ 4 1.3 Objetivo y Alcance ....................................................................................... 5 1.4 Metodología ................................................................................................. 6 2. Evolución del PMTU Década 1960-1969 ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: a Literature Review
    Transit Cooperative Research Program Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration RESEARCH RESULTS DIGEST October 2002—Number 52 Subject Area: VI Public Transit Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review This digest summarizes the literature review of TCRP Project H-27, “Transit-Oriented Development: State of the Practice and Future Benefits.” This digest provides definitions of transit-oriented development (TOD) and transit joint development (TJD), describes the institutional issues related to TOD and TJD, and provides examples of the impacts and benefits of TOD and TJD. References and an annotated bibliography are included. This digest was written by Robert Cervero, Christopher Ferrell, and Steven Murphy, from the Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley. CONTENTS IV.2 Supportive Public Policies: Finance and Tax Policies, 46 I INTRODUCTION, 2 IV.3 Supportive Public Policies: Land-Based I.1 Defining Transit-Oriented Development, 5 Initiatives, 54 I.2 Defining Transit Joint Development, 7 IV.4 Supportive Public Policies: Zoning and I.3 Literature Review, 9 Regulations, 57 IV.5 Supportive Public Policies: Complementary II INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, 10 Infrastructure, 61 II.1 The Need for Collaboration, 10 IV.6 Supportive Public Policies: Procedural and II.2 Collaboration and Partnerships, 12 Programmatic Approaches, 61 II.3 Community Outreach, 12 IV.7 Use of Value Capture, 66 II.4 Government Roles, 14
    [Show full text]
  • Subway Productivity, Performance, and Profitability: Tale of Five Cities
    Photo: Trevor Logan, Jr. Subway Productivity, Performance, and T R A N S I T Profitability: Tale of Five Cities Hong Kong, Singapore, NYC Subway Kuala Lumpur, Taipei, Train New York City Alla Reddy Alex Lu, Ted Wang System Data & Research Operations Planning New York City Transit Authority Presented at the 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D.C. (2010) Notice: Opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the New York City Transit official policy or position of MTA New York City Transit, TCRP, or any otherTRB organization. Paper #10-0487 1 Comparative Analysis • Transit system scope, density, design affect productivity, profitability, performance • History, urban geography, governance, social context, regulations impact transit design and scope • Comparisons should explain reasons for differences • Transit design philosophies – New York: high-service, widespread, represented, and equitable – Hong Kong: “prudent commercial” – Taipei, Singapore: focus on real estate development New York City Transit TRB Paper #10-0487 2 Productivity: Density and Utilization City Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong Singapore Taipei New York (1997) (2007) (2008) Stations 44 52 80 51 69 468 Passengers 27 18 14 8 8 7 per Route Mile Subway Non- $248m $1.3 bn $1.2 bn $59m $36m $161m Fare Revenue • Hong Kong is densest, 120 Area of rectangles proportional to passenger-miles carried by each system (see Pushkarev, Zupan, and Cumella, 1980) even after absorbing 100 commuter rail; New 80
    [Show full text]
  • September 2005 Bulletin.Pub
    TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - SEPTEMBER, 2005 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 48, No. 9 September, 2005 The Bulletin NEWARK CITY SUBWAY EXTENSION Published by the New York Division, Electric PROGRESS REPORT Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box by Bruce J. Russell 3001, New York, New York 10008-3001. (Photographs by the author) Work continues on the 1.3-mile-long exten- ing completion and consists of welded rail For general inquiries, sion of the Newark City Subway from Penn atop a concrete base. In front of Broad Street contact us at nydiv@ Station to the former Lackawanna Railroad Station, trackage is likewise being installed. electricrailroaders.org or station on Broad Street, a 1904-era Italianate Work on the single-track segment on the by phone at (212) 986- 4482 (voice mail style edifice complete with clock tower. When west side of Broad Street adjacent to Wash- available). ERA’s done, riders will be able to board an LRV in ington Park is in the early stage of construc- website is Penn Station, proceed a short distance in tion, with a preliminary trench excavated. www.electricrailroaders. tunnel, and then emerge onto the surface for This track will run adjacent to the curb. org. the remainder of the journey. The installation Over $200 million is being spent on this Editorial Staff: of streetcar tracks on the streets of down- short extension of the Newark City Subway, Editor-in-Chief: town Newark marks their return for the first which is many times what the original route Bernard Linder time since about 1938, when the final lines to Franklin Avenue cost in 1937.
    [Show full text]
  • Mind the Gap: How Economically Disadvantaged Students Navigate Elite Private Schools in Ontario
    MIND THE GAP: HOW ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS NAVIGATE ELITE PRIVATE SCHOOLS IN ONTARIO by William George Peat A dissertation submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Leadership, Higher and Adult Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto © Copyright by William George Peat 2020 MIND THE GAP: HOW ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS NAVIGATE ELITE PRIVATE SCHOOLS IN ONTARIO William George Peat Doctor of Philosophy Department of Leadership, Higher and Adult Education University of Toronto 2020 Abstract “Mind the gap” is a qualitative study rooted in the sociology of education, dealing with educational inequality in Canada. It asked: what is the experience of working-class students in elite secondary schools, and are the benefits of achieving social mobility worth the costs? In a country whose populace has long seen itself as middle class, but where social inequality is a growing concern and social mobility increasingly rare, the study examined the journey of three working-class students seeking to become upwardly mobile by attending elite private schools in Ontario. The study examined their experiences, and employed a combination of semistructured, in-depth interviews, and follow-up conversations. It also drew on relationships that formed as a result of them, as well as on the researcher’s knowledge of the culture of the schools the students attended. In addition, it drew upon the lived experience of the researcher, who shares similar elements of the participants’ socioeconomic background. The data produced was used to develop literary and visual portraits. The process was collaborative and enabled the participants to become co-creators in the creation of their portraits, which were subject to analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Platform–Train Interface for Rail Passengers – a Technology Review
    Platform–train interface for rail passengers – a technology review Platform–train interface for rail passengers – technology review DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Document: Final report CRC for Rail Innovation Title: Platform–train interface for rail passengers – technology review Old Central Station, 290 Ann St, Brisbane QLD 4000 Project Leader: Dr Dhamodharan Raman Authors: Rajkumar Devadoss, Shan Sanjar Ahmad and Dr Dhamodharan GPO Box 1422 Raman Brisbane Qld 4001 Project no: R3.115 Tel: +61 7 3221 2536 Fax: +61 7 3235 2987 Project name: Platform access www.railcrc.net.au Synopsis: The main purpose of this report is to review the solutions available in the public domain to address the platform gap issues of passenger rail operations in Australia. Passengers, in particular passengers with reduced mobility (including the disabled and aged people), experience difficulties in accessing railway platforms primarily due to the lack of suitable technologies or to the intrinsic design limits of platforms and rolling stock. A feasible, robust and cost-effective engineering solution is required to overcome this critical platform access issue. Various patented solutions and other solutions that are used worldwide are discussed briefly in the report. In addition, a couple of new solutions are designed and suggested in the report. Considering the lack of detailed information about the existing solutions, a basic qualitative analysis was conducted to rank the solutions. This analysis was conducted with respect to various factors, including costs involved, ease of implementation, applicability of the solutions for different platform setups, and operational safety. Most of the solutions discussed in the report are designed for high level platforms, and only cater for horizontal gaps.
    [Show full text]