DOCSLIB.ORG

Incidence of Disease Antibodies in Pheasants and Pheasant Management on Game Farms and Shooting Preserves in Iowa David John Roslien Iowa State University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Incidence of Disease Antibodies in Pheasants and Pheasant Management on Game Farms and Shooting Preserves in Iowa David John Roslien Iowa State University Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1966 Incidence of disease antibodies in pheasants and pheasant management on game farms and shooting preserves in Iowa David John Roslien Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agriculture Commons, Animal Sciences Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Recommended Citation Roslien, David John, "Incidence of disease antibodies in pheasants and pheasant management on game farms and shooting preserves in Iowa " (1966). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 5333. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/5333 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfUmed exactly as received 67-2091 ROSLIEN, David John, 1937- mCIDENCE OF DISEASE ANTIBODIES IN PHEASANTS AND PHEASANT MANAGEMENT ON GAME FARMS AND SHOOTING PRESERVES IN IOWA. Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ph.D., 1966 Agriculture, forestry and wildlife University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan INCIDENCE OF DISEASE ANTIBODIES IN PHEASANTS AND PHEASANT MANAGEMENT ON GAME FARMS AND SHOOTING PRESERVES IN IOWA by David John Roslien A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Wildlife Biology Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In Charge of Major WorJ Signature was redacted for privacy. Head of Major Department Signature was redacted for privacy. Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa 1966 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. HISTORY OF PHEASANT FARMS AND PRESERVES 5 III. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 16 IV. PROCEDURE OF INVESTIGATION 45 V. EVALUATION OF PHEASANT FARMS 84 VI. RESULTS OF SEROLOGICAL TESTS OF PEN-REARED PHEASANTS 113 VII. RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES 137 VIII. RESULTS OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES ON PRIVATE GAME FARMS AND HUNTING PRESERVES 141 IX. DISCUSSION 157 X. RECOMMENDATIONS 183 XI. SUMMARY 194 XII. LITERATURE CITED 197 XIII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 214 1 I. INTRODUCTION Wild ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus Linneaus) occupy an important position in the sporting economy of the United States. The pheasant is important in Iowa because it is sought by more hunters and is shot in larger numbers than any other game bird. In recent years lowans have killed one to two million ring-necks annually. The importance of the ring-necked pheasant as a harves- table resource in Iowa has provided impetus for several re­ search projects on the bird. Lyon (1965), Klonglan (1962), and Bolstad (1962) completed ecological studies on pheasants during recent years. Vohs (1964) and Harris (1965) studied pheasant genetics and physiology respectively. Fore (1959) and Andrews (1960) investigated blood parasitism and infec­ tious diseases of wild pheasants. These recent studies fol­ lowed up "leads" obtained during earlier investigations (Green 1937, Basket 1942, and Klonglan 1953, 1955) at the Iowa Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit. A great deal is known about the ecology of wild pheasants in Iowa. Less information is available in an area of more re­ cent interest in Iowa, namely, the ecology of pen-reared pheasants. In 1957 the state legislature legalized game breeding and shooting preserves in Iowa. When preserves were established 2 increased attention was directed to pen-reared pheasants which have been hunted during a major part of each year since then. The present study was the first intensive research on game farms and game breeding and shooting preserves in Iowa. Andrews (1960) visited seven game farms in 1959 and collected blood samples from pen-reared pheasants to supplement his work on wild birds. Little else has been done with penned birds in Iowa, The purpose of the study was to obtain information on various aspects of pheasant breeding on pheasant farms and preserves in Iowa with four principal objectives: (1) to make a serological check of game farm pheasants for specific anti­ bodies against the infectious agents for pullorum, fowl ty­ phoid, fowl paratyphoid, paracolon, and Newcastle disease virus, (2) to locate all pheasant farms and preserves in the state and to study their distribution, size, annual production, and number of years of operation, (3) to determine and to evaluate management practices on game farms in Iowa and, (4) to collect survey data to determine what other parasites and diseases occur in pen-reared pheasants, and to evaluate the incidence, prevalence and distribution of these infections and their relative importance. The role of diseases in wild pheasant populations is not well known; however, references in the literature suggest 3 diseases may have an effect on wild populations of pheasants, although in many cases direct evidence for such statements does not exist. In Iowa interactions between wild and pen- reared pheasant populations occur when wild birds enter farm yards and when penned pheasants escape. Wild pheasants are often called farm game because they occur on farms and are common visitors to farm groves and yards during some times of the year. Information from conservation officers and other conservation commission personnel indicate game breeders re­ lease pen-reared pheasants into the wild to mingle with wild populations. A proper evaluation of disease problems in pheasants must include information from both wild and pen- reared populations. Wild pheasants are an important resource in Iowa and it is important to investigate factors which might influence this resource. The condition of game farm pheasants and the number released into the wild are two such factors under investigation in this study. The Iowa Conservation Commission licenses and regulates game farms and game breeding and shooting preserves. The formulation of sound regulatory policy is not possible without adequate information on all aspects of pheasant breeding and shooting in Iowa. Pheasant breeders also need information on management, diagnostic services, and techniques of successful game farm operation. The conservation commission has generally not made this information available to game breeders, many of 4 which are not able to get enough information to operate efficiently. This study was conducted to obtain information needed by game breeders, shooting preserve operators, and the Iowa Con­ servation Commission. 5 II. HISTORY OF PHEASANT FARMS AND PRESERVES A. General History in Iowa A general history of game farms and game breeding and shooting preserves in Iowa is presented as a basic ground work to the present study. Such information has not previously been assembled in a single paper. The Summary presented here is based on such literature as could be located. Success and/ or failure of game breeding establishments throughout past years provides an indication of what problems may have existed and how these problems may have been solved. The relationship of these problems, past and present, to game breeding is of major interest at the present time. A published history on the number of game farms in Iowa since 1932 can be found in the biennial reports of the Iowa Fish and Game Commission (1932-1963). This source refers to private pheasant farms in Iowa as early as 1930. The history of game breeding and shooting preserves in the state is well defined from the time of enactment of the Iowa game breeding and shooting preserve law in 1957. B. History of State Game Farm In recent times all game farms in Iowa, with the excep­ tion of the Iowa State Game Farm at Boone, Iowa, have been privately owned. Conservation Commission game farms at Lan­ sing and Clive, Iowa, have not operated since the 1930's. 6 The Iowa Wildlife Research and Exhibit Station (formerly called Iowa State Game Farm) has been the largest game farm in the state during the past 30 years. Records of pheasant production at this farm have been published biennially since 1938 and a summary of this information is presented (Table 1). In 1940, 45,000 pheasant chicks were hatched at the State Game Farm but production decreased gradually to 3,500 birds in 1961. No pheasants were hatched or reared by the Conservation Commission Station in 1962 and the ring-neck pheasant production program has operated on a limited basis since then. In 1932 the biennial report states that game farms oper­ ated at Clive and Lansing curtailed operations because a recently conducted game survey indicated better results were obtained if birds and eggs were purchased from commercial game breeders. From 1932-1938 private game breeders supplied parent stock whenever needed for release. Commission game bird stocking programs during the period were limited to introduc­ ing parent stock into areas where pheasants previously existed, but where they had subsequently been reduced to low levels. This supposed need for parent stock was limited to local 4-H club pheasant egg projects until about 1935 when a series of unfavorable drought years coupled with the severe winter of 1935-36 reduced wild pheasant populations in Iowa. The hunting season was closed in 1936-37. Even so, poor production the Table 1. Sununary of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessing the Status of Handsome Francolin Francolinus Nobilis in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Western Uganda
    Scopus 25: 4150, December 2005 Assessing the status of Handsome Francolin Francolinus nobilis in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, western Uganda Richard Ssemmanda and Richard A. Fuller The Handsome Francolin is a ground-dwelling partridge occurring in montane forest and the high-altitude bamboo zone within a restricted area along the Albertine Rift Mountains from the Bleus Mountains in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) south to Burundi (Urban et al. 1986, Madge & McGowan 2002). It appears to occur over a global range of about 120 000 km2 (Fuller et al. 2000, BirdLife International 2004), although there are very few recent records from most parts of this area. The small area of the Albertine Rift Mountains supports 41 endemic bird species, 11 of which are globally threatened (BirdLife International 2004, Plumptre et al. 2003). Forest covers much of the 56 000 km2 in the Albertine Rift Endemic Bird Area, and much of it is rugged terrain very difficult to access (Shaw & Shewry 2001). Despite this, there are significant human pressures in the area, stemming mostly from large increases in human population densities as a result of refugee movements (Omari et al. 1999, Gatarabirwa et al. 2000). Being large, slow-moving, palatable terrestrial birds, the Galliformes are under particularly direct pressure from humans through hunting and disturbance, and they may provide useful rapid indicators of the amount of human pressure in a particular area. The area surrounding Bwindi is one of Ugandas most densely populated rural areas with human densities of 160320 people/km2. Approximately 10 000 families cultivate the land immediately surrounding the park (Butynski 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of the Pheasants and Partridges Suggests That These Lineages Are Not Monophyletic R
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Vol. 11, No. 1, February, pp. 38–54, 1999 Article ID mpev.1998.0562, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on A Molecular Phylogeny of the Pheasants and Partridges Suggests That These Lineages Are Not Monophyletic R. T. Kimball,* E. L. Braun,*,† P. W. Zwartjes,* T. M. Crowe,‡,§ and J. D. Ligon* *Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131; †National Center for Genome Resources, 1800 Old Pecos Trail, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505; ‡Percy FitzPatrick Institute, University of Capetown, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa; and §Department of Ornithology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024-5192 Received October 8, 1997; revised June 2, 1998 World partridges are smaller and widely distributed in Cytochrome b and D-loop nucleotide sequences were Asia, Africa, and Europe. Most partridge species are used to study patterns of molecular evolution and monochromatic and primarily dull colored. None exhib- phylogenetic relationships between the pheasants and its the extreme or highly specialized ornamentation the partridges, which are thought to form two closely characteristic of the pheasants. related monophyletic galliform lineages. Our analyses Although the order Galliformes is well defined, taxo- used 34 complete cytochrome b and 22 partial D-loop nomic relationships are less clear within the group sequences from the hypervariable domain I of the (Verheyen, 1956), due to the low variability in anatomi- D-loop, representing 20 pheasant species (15 genera) and 12 partridge species (5 genera). We performed cal and osteological traits (Blanchard, 1857, cited in parsimony, maximum likelihood, and distance analy- Verheyen, 1956; Lowe, 1938; Delacour, 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • 1471-2148-10-132.Pdf
    Shen et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:132 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/132 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access AResearch mitogenomic article perspective on the ancient, rapid radiation in the Galliformes with an emphasis on the Phasianidae Yong-Yi Shen1,2,3, Lu Liang1,2,3, Yan-Bo Sun1,2,3, Bi-Song Yue4, Xiao-Jun Yang1, Robert W Murphy1,5 and Ya- Ping Zhang*1,2 Abstract Background: The Galliformes is a well-known and widely distributed Order in Aves. The phylogenetic relationships of galliform birds, especially the turkeys, grouse, chickens, quails, and pheasants, have been studied intensively, likely because of their close association with humans. Despite extensive studies, convergent morphological evolution and rapid radiation have resulted in conflicting hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships. Many internal nodes have remained ambiguous. Results: We analyzed the complete mitochondrial (mt) genomes from 34 galliform species, including 14 new mt genomes and 20 published mt genomes, and obtained a single, robust tree. Most of the internal branches were relatively short and the terminal branches long suggesting an ancient, rapid radiation. The Megapodiidae formed the sister group to all other galliforms, followed in sequence by the Cracidae, Odontophoridae and Numididae. The remaining clade included the Phasianidae, Tetraonidae and Meleagrididae. The genus Arborophila was the sister group of the remaining taxa followed by Polyplectron. This was followed by two major clades: ((((Gallus, Bambusicola) Francolinus) (Coturnix, Alectoris)) Pavo) and (((((((Chrysolophus, Phasianus) Lophura) Syrmaticus) Perdix) Pucrasia) (Meleagris, Bonasa)) ((Lophophorus, Tetraophasis) Tragopan))). Conclusions: The traditional hypothesis of monophyletic lineages of pheasants, partridges, peafowls and tragopans was not supported in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • O'er Crag and Torrent with Rod and Gun : Shooting and Fishing
    THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES ', \r . O'ER CRAG AND TORRENT 4 O'ER CRAG AND TORRENT 6un SHOOTING AND FISHING BY W. STANHOPE-LOVELL LONDON R. A. EVERETT & CO. 42 ESSEX STREET, STRAND, W.C. 1904 All Rights Reserved. CONTENTS fAGE DEDICATION 7 PREFACE - n OTTER HUNTING 13 FOOT HARRIERS 45 PSEUDONYMOUS FOOT BEAGLES - - - - 57 BADGERS ------.-. 7! GROUSE SHOOTING IN - - IRELAND OVER DOGS .105 ST. GILES' DAY II9 ON THE BORDERS OF DARTMOOR WITH THE PARTRIDGES 129 PHEASANT - SHOOTING I 4I SNIPE SHOOTING IN IRELAND 153 TROUT FISHING IN WICKLOW 165 " A RED LETTER - DAY ON THE CAMEL RIVER" 191 SEA FISHING AT ST. IVES 20$ SHEEP-DOG TRIALS 215 A SPORTSMAN'S CHRISTMAS .... 227 MY DERBY SWEEP ----... 239 ODDS AND ENDS 249 EXODUS 257 ' JOHN A. DOYLE, ESQ., J.P.D.L. AND FELLOW OF ALL SOULS COLLEGE, OXFORD THESE UNPRETENTIOUS EFFORTS ARE DEDICATED WITH EVERY SENTIMENT OF REGARD AND AS A SMALL TOKEN OF APPRECIATION OF THE MANY HAPPY DAYS OF SPORT I AND MINE HAVE SPENT THROUGH HIS INSTRUMENTALITY AND KINDNESS. WM. STANHOPE-LOVELL (Fiery Brown), Pendarren Cottage, July, 1904. PREFACE SOME of the reminiscences recorded in the following pages were originally written for Land and Water to whose editor I am indebted for unvarying courtesy and kindness and for other papers. The idea of publishing some of my recol- lections in book form was suggested in the smoking-room, after a very pleasant shoot, by some keen old friends, well known in the world of sport, who urged me to write a series of short anecdotes relating to various forms of our common pleasure, based on personal and practical experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Diseases of Gamebirds in Great Britain
    Common diseases of gamebirds in Great Britain In the summer months gamebird flocks may During the rearing stage, growing gamebirds are experience health problems and veterinarians given access to an outside run attached to a may be presented with pheasants, partridges, or brooder pen/house. At this stage, development of other gamebirds. It is therefore important to be a good quality, complete and waterproof aware of and consider some of the common feathering is essential for gamebirds to endure gamebird diseases to aid the investigation and adverse weather conditions. Feather pecking and differential diagnosis of such health problems. aggression between gamebirds poults may have a significant impact on plumage quality. Stocking Health problems during the first three weeks rates, boredom/stress, ill-health, unbalanced diets of life and poor management may be contributory Rotavirus infection is commonly seen in factors that can lead to feather pecking and have pheasants and partridges as the cause of illness, a detrimental effect on birds’ plumage. diarrhoea and death, mostly between the ages of Motile protozoa: Spironucleus meleagridis 4 and 14 days. Grossly, there is distension of the (Hexamita) and Tetratrichomonas gallinarum are intestinal tract and caeca by frothy yellow fluid. motile protozoa that commonly cause health Secondary bacterial infections may cause problems in gamebirds, notably diarrhoea and pericarditis, perihepatitis, hepatomegaly or mortality, during the summer months. S. splenomegaly. Usually, gamebirds are affected by meleagridis has whip-like flagella and is highly group A rotaviruses, but non-group A (atypical) motile with a quick jerky action. In contrast, T. rotavirus infections also occur. Rotavirus detection gallinarum is longer and moves more slowly and is usually by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis smoothly.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Category C of the British List†
    Ibis (2005), 147, 803–820 Blackwell Publishing, Ltd. Changes to Category C of the British List† STEVE P. DUDLEY* British Ornithologists’ Union, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK In its maintenance of the British List, the British Ornithologists’ Union Records Committee (BOURC) is responsible for assigning species to categories to indicate their status on the List. In 1995, the British Ornithologists’ Union (BOU) and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) held a conference on naturalized and introduced birds in Britain (Holmes & Simons 1996). This led to a review of the process of establishment of such species and the terms that best describe their status (Holmes & Stroud 1995) as well as a major review of the categorization of species on the British List (Holmes et al. 1998). The BOURC continues to review the occurrence and establishment of birds of captive origin in Britain. This paper sum- marizes the status of naturalized and introduced birds in Britain and announces changes to the categorization of many on the British List or its associated appendices (Categories D and E): Mute Swan Cygnus olor Categories AC change to AC2 Black Swan Cygnus atratus Category E* – no change Greylag Goose Anser anser Categories ACE* change to AC2C4E* Snow Goose Anser caerulescens Categories AE* change to AC2E* Greater Canada Goose Branta canadensis Categories ACE* change to C2E* Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis Categories AE* change to AC2E* Egyptian Goose Alopochen aegyptiacus Categories CE* change
    [Show full text]
  • Game Bird Farm and Shooting Preserve Programs
    Game Bird Farm and Shooting Preserve Programmatic EIS 3 - 1 Game Bird Farm and Shooting Preserve Programs FINAL PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT December 2001 Final PEIS Game Bird Farm and Shooting Preserve Programmatic EIS 3 - 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1-1 BACKGROUND FOR PROGRAMMATIC EIS ...................................................................................1-1 PURPOSE AND NEED .......................................................................................................................1-2 ROLE OF FWP AND OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES.............................................................1-2 PUBLIC SCOPING..............................................................................................................................1-3 Issues Raised During Scoping Period...................................................................................1-3 Wildlife ......................................................................................................................1-3 Vegetation.................................................................................................................1-3 Noise.........................................................................................................................1-3 Socioeconomic .........................................................................................................1-3 PUBLIC COMMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Ecology of Tibetan Eared Pheasant Crossoptilon Harmani in Scrub Environment, with Special Reference to the Effect of Food
    Ibis (2003), 145, 657–666 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Reproductive ecology of Tibetan Eared Pheasant Crossoptilon harmani in scrub environment, with special reference to the effect of food XIN LU1* & GUANG-MEI ZHENG2 1Department of Zoology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China 2Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China We studied the nesting ecology of two groups of the endangered Tibetan Eared Pheasants Crossoptilon harmani in scrub environments near Lhasa, Tibet, during 1996 and 1999–2001. One group received artificial food from a nunnery prior to incubation whereas the other fed on natural food. This difference in the birds’ nutritional history allowed us to assess the effects of food on reproduction. Laying occurred between mid-April and early June, with a peak at the end of April or early May. Eggs were laid around noon. Adult females produced one clutch per year. Clutch size averaged 7.4 eggs (4–11). Incubation lasted 24–25 days. We observed a higher nesting success (67.7%) than reported for other eared pheasants. Pro- visioning had no significant effect on the timing of clutch initiation or nesting success, and a weak effect on egg size and clutch size (explaining 8.2% and 9.1% of the observed variation, respectively). These results were attributed to the observation that the unprovisioned birds had not experienced local food shortage before laying, despite spending more time feeding and less time resting than the provisioned birds. Nest-site selection by the pheasants was non-random with respect to environmental variables. Rock-cavities with an entrance aver- aging 0.32 m2 in size and not deeper than 1.5 m were greatly preferred as nest-sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Specimen Record of a Long-Billed Murrelet from Eastern Washington, with Notes on Plumage and Morphometric Differences Between Long-Billed and Marbled Murrelets
    SPECIMEN RECORD OF A LONG-BILLED MURRELET FROM EASTERN WASHINGTON, WITH NOTES ON PLUMAGE AND MORPHOMETRIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LONG-BILLED AND MARBLED MURRELETS CHRISTOPER W. THOMPSON, WashingtonDepartment of Fish and Wildlife, 16018 Mill Creek Blvd., Mill Creek, Washington98012, and Burke Museum,Box 353100, Universityof Washington,Seattle, Washington 98195 KEVIN J. PULLEN, ConnerMuseum, Washington State University, Pullman, Wash- ington 99164 RICHARD E. JOHNSON, Conner Museumand School of BiologicalSciences, WashingtonState University,Pullman, Washington 99164 ERICB. CUMMINS, WashingtonDepartment of Fishand Wildlife, 600 CapitolWay North, Olympia,Washington 98501 ABSTRACT:On 14 August2001, RobertDice found a Brachyramphusmurrelet approximately12 mileseast of Pomeroyin easternWashington state more than 200 milesfrom the nearestmarine waters. The bird died later that day. It had begun definitiveprebasic body molt, but not flightfeather molt. Necropsy indicated that the birdwas a female,probably in her secondcalendar year. Johnson and Thompson identifiedthe birdas a Long-billedMurrelet, Brachyramphus perdix, on the basisof plumageand measurements;it is the firstspecimen of thisspecies for Washington state. Contrary to many recent publicationsstating that Long-billedand Marbled Murreletshave white and brownunder wing coverts, respectively, we confirmedthat bothspecies typically have white under wing coverts prior to definitiveprebasic molt andbrown under wing coverts after this molt. Absence of anyextensive storm systems in the North Pacificin
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Risk Assessments for Methods Used in Wildlife Damage Management
    Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment for the Use of Wildlife Damage Management Methods by USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services Chapter I Introduction to Risk Assessments for Methods Used in Wildlife Damage Management MAY 2017 Introduction to Risk Assessments for Methods Used in Wildlife Damage Management EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services (WS) Program completed Risk Assessments for methods used in wildlife damage management in 1992 (USDA 1997). While those Risk Assessments are still valid, for the most part, the WS Program has expanded programs into different areas of wildlife management and wildlife damage management (WDM) such as work on airports, with feral swine and management of other invasive species, disease surveillance and control. Inherently, these programs have expanded the methods being used. Additionally, research has improved the effectiveness and selectiveness of methods being used and made new tools available. Thus, new methods and strategies will be analyzed in these risk assessments to cover the latest methods being used. The risk assements are being completed in Chapters and will be made available on a website, which can be regularly updated. Similar methods are combined into single risk assessments for efficiency; for example Chapter IV contains all foothold traps being used including standard foothold traps, pole traps, and foot cuffs. The Introduction to Risk Assessments is Chapter I and was completed to give an overall summary of the national WS Program. The methods being used and risks to target and nontarget species, people, pets, and the environment, and the issue of humanenss are discussed in this Chapter. From FY11 to FY15, WS had work tasks associated with 53 different methods being used.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Pheasant Chrysolophus Pictus
    Young Golden Pheasant Chrysolophus pictus What is the history of my relationship to man? The Golden Pheasant is commonly found in zoos and aviaries, but often as impure specimens that have the similar Lady Amherst's Pheasant in their lineage. Habitat / Climate Where am I from? dark young conifer forests The Golden Pheasant or "Chinese Pheasant",is a parrot like Map with sparse undergrowth gamebird of the order Galliformes. It is native to forests in mountainous areas of western China but feral populations have been established in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. Other family members: Caspian snowcock Who are my relatives? Gray partridge Silver Pheasant, Little chachalaca, Yellow- knobbed curassow and Western capercaillie the Turkey Breeding Potential How am I born? We lay 8-12 eggs at a time and will then incubate these for around 22-23 days. Clutch size 8 to 12 eggs When we hatch we are able to walk and look for food with in hours. By a few weeks we will loose our down and have our feathers in. How long does it take me to grow up and how long do I live Once we have gotten our feathers we will keep getting bigger. By 3 months we will be full Breeding Season grown, we might add a few pounds after that but wont get larger. We can live up to 6 years. J F M A M J J A S O N D A E A P A U U U E C O E N B R R Y N L G P T V C What kind of family life do I have? We are extremely territorial.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinary Competition for Nestboxes May with the Particular Pair of Birds in Result in Domestic Squabbling
    Another common problem in The reasons for this behavior are budgie aviaries is overcrowding. potentially numerous, and may vary Veterinary Competition for nestboxes may with the particular pair of birds in result in domestic squabbling. Also question. I have often related this the curiosity of other hens who are behavior to parents that have a not involved in chick rearing of their strong desire to go back to nest and Viewpoints own may cause the anxious mother lay another clutch of eggs. Poten­ to transfer aggression and frustration tially, the parent birds are attempting compiled byAmy Worell, D. V. M. to her own chicks while fending off to encourage theiryoung offspring to Woodland Hills, California the nosey intruders. This problem prematurely fledge the nest in an Question 1: I raise budgies and can be remedied by adding an ade­ effort to empty the nest for the next have the problem where one of the quate number of nestboxes and round. hens plucks the feathers on the reducing the number of birds within Other than handfeeding the abused babies while they are in the nestbox. the flight. Many budgie breeders youngsters, fostering the chicks Other than handfeeding the babies, is suggest that excess hens in the under a receptive hen may be a viable there any way to prevent the hen communal aviary tend to generate and workable option for your partic­ from plucking the babies? more problems. ular problem. S. Thompson, Colorado Unnecessary disturbances from Additionally, re-evaluating the outside sources, such as children or nesting environment for potential Answer: Although I am not an housepets (dogs or cats, for exam­ distractions and stressful factors may experienced budgie aviculturist, I ple), may induce the neurotic behav­ prevent this problem in some pairs.
    [Show full text]