DOCSLIB.ORG

Worst of 2018 Listener Survey WORST WRESTLER (MALE) Responses to This Question: 391

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Worst of 2018 Listener Survey WORST WRESTLER (MALE) Responses to This Question: 391 Worst of 2018 Listener Survey WORST WRESTLER (MALE) Responses to this question: 391 170 43.5% Baron Corbin 1 0.3% Matt Hardy 40 10.2% Jinder Mahal 1 0.3% Maxwell Jacob Feinstein 22 5.6% Shane McMahon 1 0.3% Nick Aldis 18 4.6% Bobby Lashley 1 0.3% Randy Orton 12 3.1% Big Cass 1 0.3% Sami Callihan 11 2.8% Brock Lesnar 1 0.3% Shinsuke Nakamura 11 2.8% Titus O'Neil 1 0.3% Soma Takao 9 2.3% Elias 1 0.3% Takashi Iizuka 8 2.0% Taichi 1 0.3% The Great Khali 8 2.0% The Undertaker 1 0.3% Tye Dillinger 5 1.3% Enzo Amore 1 0.3% Tyson T-Bone 5 1.3% James Ellsworth 1 0.3% Zack Ryder 4 1.0% Bad Luck Fale 4 1.0% Kona Reeves 4 1.0% No Way Jose 3 0.8% Bobby Roode 3 0.8% Bray Wyatt 3 0.8% David Arquette 3 0.8% Mojo Rawley 2 0.5% Angel o Demonio 2 0.5% Braun Strowman 2 0.5% Cody 2 0.5% Lars Sullivan 2 0.5% Nicholas 2 0.5% Roman Reigns 2 0.5% Tama Tonga 2 0.5% The Miz 2 0.5% Yoshi-Hashi 1 0.3% Aiden English 1 0.3% Barrington Hughes 1 0.3% Beer City Bruiser 1 0.3% Curt Hawkins 1 0.3% Curtis Axel 1 0.3% Dean Ambrose 1 0.3% Dolph Ziggler 1 0.3% EC3 1 0.3% Fallah Bahh 1 0.3% Finn Balor 1 0.3% Gringo Loco 1 0.3% Jason Jordan 1 0.3% Jeff Jarrett 1 0.3% Kane 1 0.3% Kenny Omega 1 0.3% Kurt Angle 1 0.3% Manabu Nakanishi 1 0.3% Marty Scurll WORST WRESTLER (FEMALE) Responses to this question: 386 139 36.0% Nia Jax 55 14.2% Brie Bella 44 11.4% Lana 38 9.8% Tamina 32 8.3% Alicia Fox 28 7.3% Carmella 17 4.4% Dana Brooke 4 1.0% Ronda Rousey 3 0.8% Bayley 3 0.8% Lacey Evans 3 0.8% Natalya 2 0.5% Billie Kay 2 0.5% Brandi Rhodes 2 0.5% Nikki Bella 1 0.3% Alexa Bliss 1 0.3% Aliah 1 0.3% Asuka 1 0.3% Becky Lynch 1 0.3% Charlotte 1 0.3% Jinny 1 0.3% Katerina 1 0.3% Kavita Devi 1 0.3% Kelly Kelly 1 0.3% Laura Di Matteo 1 0.3% Sonya Deville 1 0.3% Stephanie McMahon 1 0.3% Sumie Sukai 1 0.3% Zelina Vega WORST TAG TEAM Responses to this question: 355 127 35.8% B Team 1 0.3% R-Truth & Carmella 38 10.7% The Ascension 1 0.3% Team Hell No 16 4.5% Bobby Roode & Chad Gable 1 0.3% The Dawgs 15 4.2% Authors of Pain 1 0.3% The Hype Bros. 15 4.2% Matt Hardy & Bray Wyatt 1 0.3% The Kingdom 14 3.9% The Colons 1 0.3% TM61 13 3.7% Titus World Wide 7 2.0% Undertaker & Kane 6 1.7% Bayley & Sasha Banks 6 1.7% Braun Strowman & Nicholas 6 1.7% Lucha House Party 5 1.4% Bella Twins 5 1.4% Heath Slater & Rhyno 5 1.4% Heavy Machinery 5 1.4% New Day 5 1.4% Nia Jax & Tamina 5 1.4% The Bar 4 1.1% Bludgeon Brothers 4 1.1% Breezango 4 1.1% Desi Hit Squad 4 1.1% Forgotten Sons 4 1.1% Guerillas of Destiny 4 1.1% The Revival 2 0.6% Alicia Fox & Jinder Mahal 2 0.6% Drew McIntyre & Dolph Ziggler 2 0.6% Gallows & Anderson 2 0.6% IIconics 2 0.6% Seth Rollins & Jason Jordan 2 0.6% The Bouncers 2 0.6% The Forgotten Sons 2 0.6% The Mighty 2 0.6% Young Bucks 1 0.3% Absolution 1 0.3% Bobby Lashley & Lio Rush 1 0.3% Brahman Brothers 1 0.3% Danny Burch & Oney Lorcan 1 0.3% Dean Ambrose & Seth Rollins 1 0.3% El Desperado & Yoshinobu Kanemaru 1 0.3% Eli Drake & Scott Steiner 1 0.3% Fallah Bahh & KM 1 0.3% JC & Chris 1 0.3% Killer Elite Squad 1 0.3% Minoru Suzuki & Takashi Iizuka 1 0.3% Miz & Shane 1 0.3% Ohio Versus Everything 1 0.3% Riott Squad WORST PROMOTION Responses to this question: 332 207 62.3% WWE 69 20.8% Impact Wrestling 12 3.6% Lucha Underground 10 3.0% Ring of Honor 5 1.5% AAA 5 1.5% World of Sport 3 0.9% CZW 3 0.9% ICW 2 0.6% 205 Live 2 0.6% NJPW 2 0.6% NWA 2 0.6% UFC 1 0.3% 5 Star Wrestling 1 0.3% Evolve 1 0.3% Golden Boy Promotions 1 0.3% MLW 1 0.3% NXT 1 0.3% NXT UK 1 0.3% Progress 1 0.3% Ring Warriors 1 0.3% WCPW 1 0.3% WWW WORST FEUD Responses to this question: 343 101 29.4% Bayley vs. Sasha Banks 1 0.3% Tetsuya Naito vs. Minoru Suzuki 51 14.9% Sami Zayn vs. Bobby Lashley 1 0.3% The Miz vs. Shane McMahon 20 5.8% Finn Balor vs. Baron Corbin 19 5.5% AJ Styles vs. Shinsuke Nakamura 17 5.0% Brock Lesnar vs. Roman Reigns 16 4.7% Daniel Bryan vs. Big Cass 15 4.4% DX vs. Brothers of Destruction 12 3.5% Dean Ambrose vs. Seth Rollins 9 2.6% AOP vs. Roode & Gable 8 2.3% Alexa Bliss vs. Nia Jax 7 2.0% Kevin Owens vs. Braun Strowman 5 1.5% Asuka vs. Carmella 5 1.5% Raw vs. SmackDown 4 1.2% Dolph Ziggler vs. Seth Rollins 4 1.2% Randy Orton vs. Jeff Hardy 4 1.2% Rusev vs. Aiden English 3 0.9% B Team vs. Hardy & Wyatt 3 0.9% Bray Wyatt vs. Matt Hardy 3 0.9% Bullet Club Civil War 3 0.9% Lucha house party vs. The Revival 3 0.9% Tommaso Ciampa vs. Johnny Gargano 2 0.6% Natalya vs. Ruby Riott 2 0.6% Nia Jax vs. Ronda Rousey 2 0.6% Ronda Rousey vs. Nikki Bella 2 0.6% Shield vs. Dogs of War 1 0.3% Baron Corbin vs. Elias 1 0.3% Baron Corbin vs. Kurt Angle 1 0.3% Baron Corbin vs. No Way Jose 1 0.3% Bobby Lashley vs. Elias 1 0.3% Bobby Lashley vs. Kevin Owens 1 0.3% Bray Wyatt vs. Finn Balor 1 0.3% Bully Ray vs. Flip Gordon 1 0.3% Charlotte vs. Becky Lynch 1 0.3% Cody vs. Nick Aldis 1 0.3% Dolph Ziggler vs. Shane McMahon 1 0.3% Drake Maverick vs. The Big Show 1 0.3% HARASHIMA vs. Soma Takao 1 0.3% Joe Hendry vs. Grado 1 0.3% Joey Ryan vs. Hangman Page 1 0.3% Kevin Owens vs. Shane McMahon 1 0.3% LAX vs. OGs 1 0.3% Mojo Rawley vs. Bobby Roode 1 0.3% Mojo Rawley vs. No Way Jose 1 0.3% Ronda Rousey vs. Brie Bella 1 0.3% Sami Zayn vs. Shane McMahon 1 0.3% Stephanie McMahon vs. Shane McMahon WORST MEN'S MATCH Responses to this question: 284 40 14.1% DX vs. Brothers of Destruction (Crown Jewel) 1 0.4% Lesnar vs. Reigns (Money in the Bank) 35 12.3% Lesnar vs. Reigns (WrestleMania) 1 0.4% Lesnar vs. Strowman vs. Kane (Royal Rumble) 23 8.1% Shane McMahon vs. Dolph Ziggler (Crown Jewel 1 0.4% Mask vs. Mask Cage Match (Triplemania) 20 7.0% HHH vs. Undertaker (Super Showdown) 1 0.4% Matt Riddle vs. Kassius Ohno 20 7.0% Reigns vs. Mahal (Money in the Bank) 1 0.4% Matt Riddle vs. Punishment Martinez 15 5.3% Lesnar vs. Strowman (Crown Jewel) 1 0.4% Randy Orton vs. Jeff Hardy (Hell in a Cell) 13 4.6% Braun Strowman & Nicholas vs. The Bar (Wrestl 1 0.4% Resto Del Mundo vs. Team Mexico (CMLL) 11 3.9% Roman Reigns vs. Samoa Joe (Backlash) 1 0.4% Royal Rumble Match (Greatest Royal Rumble) 10 3.5% Bobby Lashley vs. Sami Zayn (Money in the Ban 1 0.4% Scurll vs. Castle (Super Card of Honor) 9 3.2% John Cena vs. Undertaker (WrestleMania) 1 0.4% Soberan vs. Martines (ROH Manhattan Mayhem 8 2.8% Brock Lesnar vs. Roman Reigns (Greatest Royal 1 0.4% Team Hell No vs. Bludgeon Brothers (WWE Extr 6 2.1% Braun Strowman vs. Roman Reigns (Hell In A Cel 1 0.4% Tetsuya Naito vs. Minoru Suzuki (Destruction) 6 2.1% David Arquette vs. Nick Gage (LA Confidential) 1 0.4% The Bar vs. Seth Rollins & Jason Jordan (Royal R 5 1.8% Tama Tonga vs. Toru Yano (G1) 1 0.4% Tommy Dreamer vs. Brian Pillman Jr. (MLW Fusi 4 1.4% Hardy vs. Mahal (Greatest Royal Rumble) 1 0.4% Toru Yano vs. Davey Boy Smith Jr. (G1) 3 1.1% Baron Corbin vs. Finn Balor (Raw, 26-Nov) 1 0.4% Yoshi-Hashi vs. Bad Luck Fale (G1) 3 1.1% Eli Drake vs. James Ellsworth (Bound For Glory) 3 1.1% Taichi vs. Hirooki Goto (Destruction) 2 0.7% Bobby Lashley vs. Roman Reigns (Money in the 2 0.7% Bobby Roode vs. Randy Orton (Fastlane) 2 0.7% Daniel Bryan vs. Big Cass (Money in the Bank) 2 0.7% Seth Rollins vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Power Seeking and Backlash Against Female Politicians
    Article Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin The Price of Power: Power Seeking and 36(7) 923 –936 © 2010 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc Backlash Against Female Politicians Reprints and permission: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0146167210371949 http://pspb.sagepub.com Tyler G. Okimoto1 and Victoria L. Brescoll1 Abstract Two experimental studies examined the effect of power-seeking intentions on backlash toward women in political office. It was hypothesized that a female politician’s career progress may be hindered by the belief that she seeks power, as this desire may violate prescribed communal expectations for women and thereby elicit interpersonal penalties. Results suggested that voting preferences for female candidates were negatively influenced by her power-seeking intentions (actual or perceived) but that preferences for male candidates were unaffected by power-seeking intentions. These differential reactions were partly explained by the perceived lack of communality implied by women’s power-seeking intentions, resulting in lower perceived competence and feelings of moral outrage. The presence of moral-emotional reactions suggests that backlash arises from the violation of communal prescriptions rather than normative deviations more generally. These findings illuminate one potential source of gender bias in politics. Keywords gender stereotypes, backlash, power, politics, intention, moral outrage Received June 5, 2009; revision accepted December 2, 2009 Many voters see Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton as coldly politicians and that these penalties may be reflected in voting ambitious, a perception that could ultimately doom her presi- preferences. dential campaign. Peter Nicholas, Los Angeles Times, 2007 Power-Relevant Stereotypes Power seeking may be incongruent with traditional female In 1916, Jeannette Rankin was elected to the Montana seat in gender stereotypes but not male gender stereotypes for a the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism and the Collapse of Soviet Communism
    Nationalism and the Collapse of Soviet Communism MARK R. BEISSINGER Abstract This article examines the role of nationalism in the collapse of communism in the late 1980s and early 1990s, arguing that nationalism (both in its presence and its absence, and in the various conflicts and disorders that it unleashed) played an important role in structuring the way in which communism collapsed. Two institutions of international and cultural control in particular – the Warsaw Pact and ethnofederalism – played key roles in determining which communist regimes failed and which survived. The article argues that the collapse of communism was not a series of isolated, individual national stories of resistance but a set of interrelated streams of activity in which action in one context profoundly affected action in other contexts – part of a larger tide of assertions of national sovereignty that swept through the Soviet empire during this period. That nationalism should be considered among the causes of the collapse of communism is not a view shared by everyone. A number of works on the end of communism in the Soviet Union have argued, for instance, that nationalism played only a minor role in the process – that the main events took place within official institutions in Moscow and had relatively little to do with society, or that nationalism was a marginal motivation or influence on the actions of those involved in key decision-making. Failed institutions and ideologies, an economy in decline, the burden of military competition with the United States and instrumental goals of self-enrichment among the nomenklatura instead loom large in these accounts.1 In many narratives of the end of communism, nationalism is portrayed merely as a consequence of communism’s demise, as a phase after communism disintegrated – not as an autonomous or contributing force within the process of collapse itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontlash/Backlash: the Crisis of Solidarity and the Threat to Civil Institutions
    Ó American Sociological Association 2018 DOI: 10.1177/0094306118815497 http://cs.sagepub.com FEATURED ESSAY Frontlash/Backlash: The Crisis of Solidarity and the Threat to Civil Institutions JEFFREY C. ALEXANDER Yale University [email protected] It is fear and loathing time for the left, sociol- The first thing to recognize is that ogists prominently among them. Loathing Trumpism and the alt-right are nothing for President Trump, champion of the alt- new, not here, not anywhere where right forces that, marginalized for decades, civil spheres have been simultaneously are bringing bigotry, patriarchy, nativism, and enabled and constrained. The depredations nationalism back into a visible place in the of Trumpism are not unique, first-time-in- American civil sphere. Fear that these threaten- American-history things. What they con- ing forces may succeed, that democracy will be stitute, instead, are backlash movements destroyed, and that the egalitarian achieve- (Alexander 2013). ments of the last five decades will be lost. Fem- Sociologists have had a bad habit of think- inism, anti-racism, multiculturalism, sexual cit- ing of social change as linear, a secular trend izenship, ecology, and internationalism—all that is broadly progressive, rooted in the these precarious achievements have come enlightening habits of modernity, education, under vicious, persistent attack. economic expansion, and the shared social Fear and loathing can be productive when interests of humankind (Marshall 1965; they are unleashed inside the culture and Parsons 1967; Habermas [1984, 1987] 1981; social structures of a civil sphere that remains Giddens 1990). From such a perspective, con- vigorous and a vital center (Schlesinger 1949; servative movements appear as deviations, Alexander 2016; Kivisto 2019) that, even if reflecting anomie and isolation (Putnam fragile, continues to hold.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Wrestling, Sports Entertainment and the Liminal Experience in American Culture
    PROFESSIONAL WRESTLING, SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT AND THE LIMINAL EXPERIENCE IN AMERICAN CULTURE By AARON D, FEIGENBAUM A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2000 Copyright 2000 by Aaron D. Feigenbaum ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are many people who have helped me along the way, and I would like to express my appreciation to all of them. I would like to begin by thanking the members of my committee - Dr. Heather Gibson, Dr. Amitava Kumar, Dr. Norman Market, and Dr. Anthony Oliver-Smith - for all their help. I especially would like to thank my Chair, Dr. John Moore, for encouraging me to pursue my chosen field of study, guiding me in the right direction, and providing invaluable advice and encouragement. Others at the University of Florida who helped me in a variety of ways include Heather Hall, Jocelyn Shell, Jim Kunetz, and Farshid Safi. I would also like to thank Dr. Winnie Cooke and all my friends from the Teaching Center and Athletic Association for putting up with me the past few years. From the World Wrestling Federation, I would like to thank Vince McMahon, Jr., and Jim Byrne for taking the time to answer my questions and allowing me access to the World Wrestling Federation. A very special thanks goes out to Laura Bryson who provided so much help in many ways. I would like to thank Ed Garea and Paul MacArthur for answering my questions on both the history of professional wrestling and the current sports entertainment product.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 WWE Finest
    BASE BASE CARDS 1 Angel Garza Raw® 2 Akam Raw® 3 Aleister Black Raw® 4 Andrade Raw® 5 Angelo Dawkins Raw® 6 Asuka Raw® 7 Austin Theory Raw® 8 Becky Lynch Raw® 9 Bianca Belair Raw® 10 Bobby Lashley Raw® 11 Murphy Raw® 12 Charlotte Flair Raw® 13 Drew McIntyre Raw® 14 Edge Raw® 15 Erik Raw® 16 Humberto Carrillo Raw® 17 Ivar Raw® 18 Kairi Sane Raw® 19 Kevin Owens Raw® 20 Lana Raw® 21 Liv Morgan Raw® 22 Montez Ford Raw® 23 Nia Jax Raw® 24 R-Truth Raw® 25 Randy Orton Raw® 26 Rezar Raw® 27 Ricochet Raw® 28 Riddick Moss Raw® 29 Ruby Riott Raw® 30 Samoa Joe Raw® 31 Seth Rollins Raw® 32 Shayna Baszler Raw® 33 Zelina Vega Raw® 34 AJ Styles SmackDown® 35 Alexa Bliss SmackDown® 36 Bayley SmackDown® 37 Big E SmackDown® 38 Braun Strowman SmackDown® 39 "The Fiend" Bray Wyatt SmackDown® 40 Carmella SmackDown® 41 Cesaro SmackDown® 42 Daniel Bryan SmackDown® 43 Dolph Ziggler SmackDown® 44 Elias SmackDown® 45 Jeff Hardy SmackDown® 46 Jey Uso SmackDown® 47 Jimmy Uso SmackDown® 48 John Morrison SmackDown® 49 King Corbin SmackDown® 50 Kofi Kingston SmackDown® 51 Lacey Evans SmackDown® 52 Mandy Rose SmackDown® 53 Matt Riddle SmackDown® 54 Mojo Rawley SmackDown® 55 Mustafa Ali Raw® 56 Naomi SmackDown® 57 Nikki Cross SmackDown® 58 Otis SmackDown® 59 Robert Roode Raw® 60 Roman Reigns SmackDown® 61 Sami Zayn SmackDown® 62 Sasha Banks SmackDown® 63 Sheamus SmackDown® 64 Shinsuke Nakamura SmackDown® 65 Shorty G SmackDown® 66 Sonya Deville SmackDown® 67 Tamina SmackDown® 68 The Miz SmackDown® 69 Tucker SmackDown® 70 Xavier Woods SmackDown® 71 Adam Cole NXT® 72 Bobby
    [Show full text]
  • Ne1 Newcastle Restaurant Week It’S Back! Eat at the City’S Best Restaurants for £10 / £15
    FREE DEC 23-JAN 20 2015/16 WHAT’S ON IN NEWCASTLE www.getintonewcastle.co.uk NE1 NEWCASTLE RESTAURANT WEEK IT’S BACK! EAT AT THE CITY’S BEST RESTAURANTS FOR £10 / £15 PLUS: BEST OF 2016! + MOTÖRHEAD REV UP + GET INTO NEWCASTLE APP CONTENTS NE1 magazine is brought to you by NE1 Ltd, the company which champions all that’s great about Newcastle city centre Pleased to Meet You WHAT’S ON IN NE1 04 UPFRONT 50% The latest news and the hottest events across NE1 DISCOUNT QUOTE 06 LET’S GO... TO HOME OWNERS LOOKING TO LIVINGNE1 Ghost stories, comedy, football, LET OR SELL THEIR PROPERTY and a curry ‘Oscar’ for Newcastle BY 31ST JANUARY 2015 08 TRY THIS 11 High flyers and fine art 11 COME DINING Our guide to NE1 Newcastle Restaurant Week - Jan 18-24 14 MUSIC Something for everyone in NE1 INSTRUCT LIVINGSPACES AS YOUR SOLE AGENT BY 31ST 19 MOTÖRHEAD JANUARY 2016 & RECEIVE 50% OFF YOUR AGENCY FEE 16 20 The legendary rockers head to town THE YEAR AHEAD HAPPY APPING New properties required to fulfil high demand! Grab your diary - here’s Welcome to the brilliant free 22 LISTINGS 50% off Landlord letting fee for new managed properties. your guide to 2016 Get into Newcastle app Your go-to guide to NE1 goings-on ©Offstone Publishing 2015. All rights Editor: Jane Pikett Fixed sales fee for new sellers. reserved. No part of this magazine may be reproduced without the written permission Words: Dean Bailey, Claire Dupree of the publisher. All information contained (listings editor) CALL US ON 0191 2221000 in this magazine is as far as we are aware, Design: Stuart Blackie, Mark Carr If you wish to submit a listing for inclusion correct at the time of going to press.
    [Show full text]
  • WWE Network Streaming Schedule - Week of February 22, 2021
    WWE Network Streaming Schedule - Week of February 22, 2021 Monday, Feb 22 Tuesday, Feb 23 Wednesday, Feb 24 Thursday, Feb 25 Friday, Feb 26 Saturday, Feb 27 Sunday, Feb 28 Elimination Chamber WWE Photo Shoot WWE 24 WWE NXT UK 205 Live WWE's The Bump WWE 24 6AM 6AM 2021 Ron Simmons Edge Feb. 18, 2021 Feb. 19, 2021 Feb. 24, 2021 Edge R-Truth Game Show WWE's The Bump 6:30A The Second Mountain The Second Mountain 6:30A Big E & The Boss Feb. 24, 2021 WWE Chronicle Elimination Chamber 7AM 7AM Bianca Belair 2021 WWE 24 WrestleMania Rewind Elimination Chamber WWE NXT UK 7:30A 7:30A R-Truth 2021 Feb. 25, 2021 WWE NXT UK 8AM The Mania Begins 8AM Feb. 25, 2021 205 Live WWE NXT UK WWE 24 8:30A 8:30A Feb. 19, 2021 Feb. 18, 2021 R-Truth WWE Untold WWE NXT UK NXT TakeOver 9AM 9AM APA Feb. 18, 2021 Vengeance Day 205 Live Broken Skull Sessions 9:30A 9:30A Feb. 19, 2021 The Best of WWE Raw Talk WWE's THE BUMP WWE Photo Shoot 10AM Sasha Banks 10AM Feb 22, 2021 FEB 24, 2021 Kofi Kingston Elimination Chamber WWE Untold This Week in WWE 10:30A The Best of John Cena 10:30A 2021 APA Feb. 25, 2021 Broken Skull Sessions WWE 365 11AM 11AM Ricochet Elimination Chamber Liv Forever 11:30A Sasha Banks 11:30A 2021 205 Live SmackDown 549 WWE Photo Shoot 12N 12N Feb. 19, 2021 Feb. 26, 2010 Kofi Kingston WWE's The Bump Chasing The Magic WWE 24 12:30P 12:30P Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Mythcon 50 Program Book
    M L o o v o i k n i g n g F o r B w a a c r k d Program Book San Diego, California • August 2-5, 2019 Mythcon 50: Moving Forward, Looking Back Guests of Honor Verlyn Flieger, Tolkien Scholar Tim Powers, Fantasy Author Conference Theme To give its far-flung membership a chance to meet, and to present papers orally with audience response, The Mythopoeic Society has been holding conferences since its early days. These began with a one-day Narnia Conference in 1969, and the first annual Mythopoeic Conference was held at the Claremont Colleges (near Los Angeles) in September, 1970. This year’s conference is the third in a series of golden anniversaries for the Society, celebrating our 50th Mythcon. Mythcon 50 Committee Lynn Maudlin – Chair Janet Brennan Croft – Papers Coordinator David Bratman – Programming Sue Dawe – Art Show Lisa Deutsch Harrigan – Treasurer Eleanor Farrell – Publications J’nae Spano – Dealers’ Room Marion VanLoo – Registration & Masquerade Josiah Riojas – Parking Runner & assistant to the Chair Venue Mythcon 50 will be at San Diego State University, with programming in the LEED Double Platinum Certified Conrad Prebys Aztec Student Union, and onsite housing in the South Campus Plaza, South Tower. Mythcon logo by Sue Dawe © 2019 Thanks to Carl Hostetter for the photo of Verlyn Flieger, and to bg Callahan, Paula DiSante, Sylvia Hunnewell, Lynn Maudlin, and many other members of the Mythopoeic Society for photos from past conferences. Printed by Windward Graphics, Phoenix, AZ 3 Verlyn Flieger Scholar Guest of Honor by David Bratman Verlyn Flieger and I became seriously acquainted when we sat across from each other at the ban- quet of the Tolkien Centenary Conference in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • PWTORCH NEWSLETTER • PAGE 2 Www
    ISSUE #1255 - MAY 26, 2012 TOP FIVE STORIES OF THE WEEK PPV ROUNDTABLE (1) Raw expanding to three hours on July 23 (2) Impact going live every week this summer (3) Flair parting ways with TNA, WWE bound WWE OVER THE LIMIT (4) Raw going “interactive” with weekly voting Staff Scores & Reviews (5) Laurinaitis pins Cena after Show turns heel Pat McNeill, columnist (6.5): The main problem with WWE Over The Limit? The main event went over the limit of what we’ll accept from WWE. You can argue that there was no reason to book John Cena against John Laurinaitis on a pay-per-view, and you’d be right. RawHEA eDLxINpE AaNnALYdSsIS to thrhoeurse, a nhd uosuaullyr tsher e’Js eunoulgyh re2de3eming But on top of that, there was no reason to book content to make it worth the investment. But Cena versus Laurinaitis to go as long as any other three hours? Three hours of lousy content is By Wade Keller, editor major pay-per-view match. And there was no enough that next time viewers might just tune in reason for Cena to drag the match out. It didn’t fit If you follow an industry long enough, you’re for a just an hour instead of the usual two and the storyline. And it made John Cena look like a bound to see some bad decisions being made. certainly not commit to all three. Or they might chump. or like The Stinger, when Big Show turned Some are worse than others, but it’s rare when pick their segments, watching the predictably heel for the umpteenth time and cost him the you think you might be seeing the Worst newsmaking segments at the start of each hour match.
    [Show full text]
  • Children, Technology and Play
    Research report Children, technology and play Marsh, J., Murris, K., Ng’ambi, D., Parry, R., Scott, F., Thomsen, B.S., Bishop, J., Bannister, C., Dixon, K., Giorza, T., Peers, J., Titus, S., Da Silva, H., Doyle, G., Driscoll, A., Hall, L., Hetherington, A., Krönke, M., Margary, T., Morris, A., Nutbrown, B., Rashid, S., Santos, J., Scholey, E., Souza, L., and Woodgate, A. (2020) Children, Technology and Play. Billund, Denmark: The LEGO Foundation. June 2020 ISBN: 978-87-999589-7-9 Table of contents Table of contents Section 1: Background to the study • 4 1.1 Introduction • 4 1.2 Aims, objectives and research questions • 4 1.3 Methodology • 5 Section 2: South African and UK survey findings • 8 2.1 Children, technology and play: South African survey data analysis • 8 2.2 Children, technology and play: UK survey data analysis • 35 2.3 Summary • 54 Section 3: Pen portraits of case study families and children • 56 3.1 South African case study family profiles • 57 3.2 UK case study family profiles • 72 3.3 Summary • 85 Section 4: Children’s digital play ecologies • 88 4.1 Digital play ecologies • 88 4.2 Relationality and children’s digital ecologies • 100 4.3 Children’s reflections on digital play • 104 4.4 Summary • 115 Section 5: Digital play and learning • 116 5.1 Subject knowledge and understanding • 116 5.2 Digital skills • 119 5.3 Holistic skills • 120 5.4 Digital play in the classroom • 139 5.5 Summary • 142 2 Table of contents Section 6: The five characteristics of learning through play • 144 6.1 Joy • 144 6.2 Actively engaging • 148
    [Show full text]
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
    A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details THE FIELD AND THE STAGE PUGILISM, COMBAT PERFORMANCE AND PROFESSIONAL WRESTLING IN ENGLAND 1700 – 1980 BENJAMIN LITHERLAND SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX FEBRUARY 2014 1 I hereby declare that this thesis has not been and will not be, submitted in whole or in part to another university for the award of any other degree. Signature:……………………………………… 2 UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX BENJAMIN LITHERLAND SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE FIELD AND THE STAGE: PUGILISM, COMBAT PERFORMANCE AND PROFESSIONAL WRESTLING IN ENGLAND, 1700 – 1980 SUMMARY Speaking to a local radio station in the 1960s, with the glitz, glitter and glamour of televised professional wrestling at its height, one old, retired Cumbrian wrestler declared that ‘wrestling…was a game for the field not the stage’. This statement, condensed and potent as it is, could stand in for the questions this thesis asks and seeks to answer: why did wrestling develop as a professional, performed ‘sporting entertainment’? To answer this question, existing theories of social and sports history are combined with cultural studies methods and applied to Pierre Bourdieu’s notion of fields.
    [Show full text]
  • BASE BASE CARDS 1 AJ Styles Raw 2 Aleister Black Raw 3 Alexa Bliss Smackdown 4 Mustafa Ali Smackdown 5 Andrade Raw 6 Asuka Raw 7
    BASE BASE CARDS 1 AJ Styles Raw 2 Aleister Black Raw 3 Alexa Bliss SmackDown 4 Mustafa Ali SmackDown 5 Andrade Raw 6 Asuka Raw 7 King Corbin SmackDown 8 Bayley SmackDown 9 Becky Lynch Raw 10 Big E SmackDown 11 Big Show WWE 12 Billie Kay Raw 13 Bobby Lashley Raw 14 Braun Strowman SmackDown 15 "The Fiend" Bray Wyatt SmackDown 16 Brock Lesnar Raw 17 Murphy Raw 18 Carmella SmackDown 19 Cesaro SmackDown 20 Charlotte Flair Raw 21 Daniel Bryan SmackDown 22 Drake Maverick SmackDown 23 Drew McIntyre Raw 24 Elias SmackDown 25 Erik 26 Ember Moon SmackDown 27 Finn Bálor NXT 28 Humberto Carrillo Raw 29 Ivar 30 Jeff Hardy WWE 31 Jey Uso SmackDown 32 Jimmy Uso SmackDown 33 John Cena WWE 34 Kairi Sane Raw 35 Kane WWE 36 Karl Anderson Raw 37 Kevin Owens Raw 38 Kofi Kingston SmackDown 39 Lana Raw 40 Lacey Evans SmackDown 41 Luke Gallows Raw 42 Mandy Rose SmackDown 43 Naomi SmackDown 44 Natalya Raw 45 Nia Jax Raw 46 Nikki Cross SmackDown 47 Peyton Royce Raw 48 Randy Orton Raw 49 Ricochet Raw 50 Roman Reigns SmackDown 51 Ronda Rousey WWE 52 R-Truth Raw 53 Ruby Riott Raw 54 Rusev Raw 55 Sami Zayn SmackDown 56 Samoa Joe Raw 57 Sasha Banks SmackDown 58 Seth Rollins Raw 59 Sheamus SmackDown 60 Shinsuke Nakamura SmackDown 61 Shorty G SmackDown 62 Sonya Deville SmackDown 63 The Miz SmackDown 64 The Rock WWE 65 Triple H WWE 66 Undertaker WWE 67 Xavier Woods SmackDown 68 Zelina Vega Raw 69 Adam Cole NXT 70 Angel Garza NXT 71 Angelo Dawkins Raw 72 Bianca Belair NXT 73 Boa NXT 74 Bobby Fish NXT 75 Bronson Reed NXT 76 Cameron Grimes NXT 77 Candice LeRae NXT 78 Damian
    [Show full text]