DOCSLIB.ORG

Unconsolidated and Consolidated Annual Report 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SLOVENSKA ODŠKODNINSKA DRUŽBA, d.d. SLOVENSKA ODŠKODNINSKA DRUŽBA COMPANY AND GROUP UNCONSOLIDATED and CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2011 Ljubljana, April 2012 Slovenska odškodninska družba Group and Company Annual Report 2011 . 2 Slovenska odškodninska družba Group and Company Annual Report 2011 STATEMENT BY THE MANAGEMENT BOARD Members of the Management Board of the Slovenska odškodninska družba, d.d., Ljubljana company (hereinafter: the Company), composed of the president of the Management Board Tomaž Kuntarič MSc., member of the Management Board Matjaž Jauk and member of the Management Board Krešo Šavrič approve: • that the business report of the Slovenska odškodninska družba Company and Group for 2011 includes a fair presentation of the development of the Company's operations and results and its financial position, including a specification of the principal types of risk which the Company and other companies included in the consolidation are exposed to as a whole; • that the financial statements, together with the notes to the financial statements, have been prepared on the assumption of a going concern and in accordance with the valid legislation and International Financial Reporting Standards adopted by the EU. • that appropriate accounting policies have been consistently applied and that accounting estimates have been made on the principle of prudence and operating efficiency. Krešo Šavrič Matjaž Jauk Tomaž Kuntarič MSc. Member of the Member of the President of the Management Board Management Board Management Board Ljubljana, 25 April 2012 3 Slovenska odškodninska družba Group and Company Annual Report 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT BY THE MANAGEMENT BOARD ..................................................................................3 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD .................................................. 5 BUSINESS REPORT ........................................................................................................................... 7 1. SLOVENSKA ODŠKODNINSKA DRUŽBA, D.D. .......................................................................8 1.1. COMPANY DETAILS ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.2. MAJOR POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS ...................................................................................15 2. SLOVENSKA ODŠKODNINSKA DRUŽBA GROUP ................................................................ 16 2.1. STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION OF THE GROUP .................................................................16 2.2. BASIC ONFORMATION ON SUBSIDIARIES WITHIN THE GROUP .............................................17 2.3. BASIC INFORMATION ON THE ASSOCIATES WITHIN THE GROUP .........................................17 3. THE MACROECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT IN 2011 ................................................................. 21 4. OPERATIONS OF SLOVENSKA ODŠKODNINSKA DRUŽBA, D.D., AND THE GROUP BY AREA ................................................................................................................................. 23 4.1. SETTLEMENT OF LIABILITIES ARISING FROM DENATIONALISATION ....................................23 4.2. SETTLEMENT OF LIABILITIES ARISING FROM COMPENSATIONS FOR CONFISCATED PROPERTY PURSUANT TO THE ABROGATION OF THE PENALTY OF CONFISCATION OF PROPERTY ............................................................................................................................... 27 4.3. SETTLEMENT OF LIABILITIES FOR COMPENSATIONS TO THE VICTIMS OF WAR AND POST-WAR VIOLENCE ..................................................................................................................28 4.4. LIABILITIES UNDER THE REIMBURSEMENT OF INVESTMENTS IN THE PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK ACT ..................................................................................30 4.5. IMPLEMENTATION OF OWNERSHIP TRANSFORMATION OF THE INSURANCE COMPANIES ACT ........................................................................................................................... 31 4.6. MANAGEMENT OF THE EQUITY INVESTMENTS OF THE GROUP ............................................33 4.7. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO AND LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT ......................................................35 4.8. RENTING OUT PROPERTY – THE PRINCIPAL ACTIVITY OF THE COMPANY PS ZA AVTO, D.O.O. ................................................................................................................................... 38 4.9. RISK MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................................................... 39 FINANCIAL REPORT ........................................................................................................................ 41 5. STATEMENT BY THE MANAGEMENT BOARD ON ITS LIABILITY ....................................... 42 6. INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT .................................................................................... 43 6.1. OPINION FOR SLOVENSKA ODŠKODNINSKA DRUŽBA, D.D. ....................................................43 6.2. OPINION FOR THE SLOVENSKA ODŠKODNINSKA DRUŽBA GROUP ...................................... 45 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE SLOVENSKA ODŠKODNINSKA DRUŽBA COMPANY AND GROUP ......................................................................................................... 47 7.1. STATEMENT OF THE FINANCIAL POSITION /BALANCE SHEET ............................................... 47 7.2. STATEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE INCOME .....................................................................48 7.3. CASH FLOW STATEMENT ............................................................................................................49 7.4. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY ..........................................................50 8. IMPORTANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES .................................................................................. 52 8.1. THE REPORTING COMPANY ........................................................................................................52 8.2. IMPORTANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES ........................................................................................53 9. NOTES AND DISCLOSURES .................................................................................................. 66 9.1. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS .................................................................................66 9.2. MANAGEMENT OF FINANCIAL RISKS OF THE COMPANY/GROUP ........................................101 9.3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS ............................................................................................104 9.4. DISCLOSURE ACCORDING TO ITEM 12 AND 13 OF ARTICLE 69 OF ZGD-1 ..........................107 9.5. OPERATINGSEGMENTS .............................................................................................................107 9.6. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND CONTINGENT ASSETS .........................................................108 9.7. POST- BALANCE SHEET EVENTS .............................................................................................109 4 Slovenska odškodninska družba Group and Company Annual Report 2011 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD Dear shareholders and business partners, The year 2011 was a year of partial recovery in the international financial markets which unfortunately did not apply to the Slovenian capital and financial markets. However, adverse conditions from previous years in the Slovenian capital market continued as it did not follow this positive trend abroad, and consequently the Slovenian stock exchange index fell. Reasons for the adverse conditions in the Slovenian capital market are multifaceted and require special treatment. Adverse conditions in the Slovenian market, which is crucial to Slovenska odškodninska družba, d.d. (hereinafter: the Company) highlighted more than ever before the importance of quality management. The Company successfully handled the changes in circumstances and all risks in the international markets as well as in Slovenia. The result of quality management of mostly cash assets, which we can also influence with our decisions, is a positive income from managing the financial instruments despite the adverse crisis in the financial markets. This particularly required the structuring and optimization of debt and more active involvement in the operation of some companies in which we hold an equity interest. We were successful in our mission and, in spite of unfavourable economic conditions, provided sufficient resources for meeting our legal obligations. We managed the property entrusted to us with due care and responsibility in order to meet all our obligations with our own financial resources in the long term. At the end of 2011, on 7 December 2011, 20 years had passed since the enforcement of the Denationalisation Act. According to the data of the Ministry of Justice which follows the realization of denationalisation, 99.1% of cases were legally finalized with administrative authorities and 97.4% with district courts on 31 December 2011 (considering cases according to Article 5 of the Denationalization Act). Mostly, the most complex and difficult denationalisation cases remained unsolved, therefore, the year 2011 was pretty difficult according to the substantive side of solving denationalisation cases. The Company decided on extremely comprehensive
Recommended publications
  • Case Study Slovenia

    Case Study Slovenia

    TOWN Small and medium sized towns in their functional territorial context Applied Research 2013/1/23 Case Study Report | Slovenia Version 05/09/2013 ESPON 2013 1 This report presents the interim results of an Applied Research Project conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & University of Leuven, 2013. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. List of authors Nataša Pichler-Milanović, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia Samo Drobne, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia Miha Konjar, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia © Institute UL-FGG d.o.o, Jamova 2, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia ESPON 2013 i Table of contents
  • Stakeholder Analysis in the Biomass Energy Development Based on the Experts’ Opinions: the Example of Triglav National Park in Slovenia

    Stakeholder Analysis in the Biomass Energy Development Based on the Experts’ Opinions: the Example of Triglav National Park in Slovenia

    Folia Forestalia Polonica, series A, 2015, Vol. 57 (3), 173–186 ORIGINAL ARTICLE DOI: 10.1515/ffp-2015-0017 Stakeholder analysis in the biomass energy development based on the experts’ opinions: the example of Triglav National Park in Slovenia Gianluca Grilli1, 2 , Giulia Garegnani2, Aleš Poljanec3, 4, Andrej Ficko4, Daniele Vettorato2, Isabella De Meo5, Alessandro Paletto6 1 University of Trento, Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, via Mesiano 77, 38123 Trento, Italy, phone: +39 0471 055 668, email: [email protected] 2 EURAC Research, Institute for Renewable Energy, Viale Druso Drususallee 1, Bozen, Italy 3 Slovenia Forest Service, Večna pot 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 4 University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department for Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 5 Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Agrobiology and Pedology Centre – CREA-ABP, Firenze, Italy 6 Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Forest Monitoring and Planning Research Unit – CREA-MPF, Trento, Italy AbstrAct The paper presents a method for identifying and classifying local stakeholders involved in renewable energy de- velopment. The method is based on the expert assessment and comprises three main steps: (1) identification of the independent experts considering their expertise and knowledge of the local context; (2) identification of the local stakeholders based on expert assessment; and (3) analytical categorisation of stakeholders taking into account the professional relationship network. Using forest biomass (bioenergy) production as example, the stakeholder analy- sis is illustrated on the case study of Triglav National Park, which is characterised by a high potential of woody biomass production and a large number of stakeholders involved in land use and management.
  • Sustainability Report of the Petrol Group

    Sustainability Report of the Petrol Group

    sustainability report of the Petrol group sustainability report Printed on 100% recycled paper. We saved: 248 kg of wood, 2,988 liters of water, 281 kWh of energy, 29 kg of CO2, 285 km road by the average European car and 153 kg of waste (source calculated as follows: www.arjowigginsgraphic.com/cyclus.html). PETROL, Slovenska energetska družba, d.d., Ljubljana Dunajska cesta 50, 1527 Ljubljana Phone: +386 1 47 14 232 www.petrol.eu sustainability report of the Petrol group sustainability report 2 sustainability report Optimization of district heating systems: 50,095 MWh of energy savings 14,027 t CO2 savings Providing energy savings to end-users: 215,000 MWh of energy savings Optimization of lighting: Efficient heat production: 80,000 t CO savings 2 6,284 MWh of electricity savings 5,799 MWh of energy savings Waste heat: 2,866 t CO savings 4,360 t CO savings 2 2 4,306 MWh of energy savings 328 t CO2 savings Renovation of boiler room and installation Photovoltaics: of cogeneration of heat and electricity unit: 2.75 GWh of electricity produced 21,057 m³ of natural gas savings 4,218 t CO savings 1,273 t CO2 savings 2 Integrated projects (implemented several measures): 5,380 MWh of energy savings 2,126 t CO2 savings Supply of electricity Cogeneration of heat and electricity: from renewable energy sources: 3.2 million m³ of natural gas savings 20% of electricity supplied 6,161 t CO2 savings Biogas plant : production of 7,166 MWh of energy from 3.4 million m³ of biogas 462 5 EV charging stations at service stations Biofuels: service stations 11,572 t CO savings Wastewater treatment plant: Q Max Fuel: 2 2,655,157 m³ treated municipal water Efficient use of water: lower consumption; 69 small wastewater treatment lower emissions of harmful gases savings of 86,987 m³ of water plants at service stations All values refer to annual savings.
  • Combined Strategic & Annual Programme Report on The

    Combined Strategic & Annual Programme Report on The

    REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA GOVERNMENT OFFICE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY COMBINED STRATEGIC & ANNUAL PROGRAMME REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EEA FINANCIAL MECHANISM AND NORWEGIAN FINANCIAL MECHANISM 2009 - 2014 IN SLOVENIA Reporting period: January 2014 – December 2014 Prepared by: National Focal Point Government Office for Development and European Cohesion Policy 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The main objective of the funds from NOR and EEA Financial Mechanisms 2009-2014 is to contribute to reducing economic and social differences and to enhance relations between beneficiary countries and donor countries. To attain its objectives, Slovenia and the donor countries determined the following priority areas: the environment and climate change, cultural heritage, research and scholarships, human and social development and civil society. Programmes SI01 (technical assistance and the fund for bilateral relations at national level), SI02 (EEA Financial Mechanism Programme) and SI05 (Norwegian Financial Mechanism Programme) were operated by the Ministry of Economic Development and Technology by 1 March 2014. On 1 March 2014 the new Government Office for Development and European Cohesion Policy was established and all above mentioned programmes are now managed by the Government Office for Development and European Cohesion Policy. SI03 (Funds for non-governmental organisations) is managed by the Regional Environmental Centre and the Centre for Information Service, Co-operation and Development of NGOs, SI04 (EEA and Norwegian scholarship programme) is managed by CMEPIUS and SI22 (Global fund for decent work and tripartite dialogue). Programmes SI01, SI03, SI04 and SI22 are in full implementation. For the programmes SI02 (EEA Financial Mechanism Programme) and SI05 (Norwegian Financial Mechanism Programme) the call for proposals was published on 27 December 2013 with the deadline for submission of project proposals 28 February 2014.
  • Republika Slovenija Ustavno Sodišče

    Republika Slovenija Ustavno Sodišče

    REPUBLIKA SLOVENIJA USTAVNO SODIŠČE U-I-30/95 21.12.1995 DECISION At a session held on 21.12.1995, in a proceeding for assessing constitutionality and legality commenced at the initiative of the Society of Ecologists of Slovenia, of Ljubljana, and Špela Remec- Rekar and others of Bled, the Constitutional Court reached the following decision : The Decree on adopting the building plan of the small industries zone of Spodnje Gorje, morphological unit "U-B15" - region "1.2. - Bled" (Official Gazette RS, no. 79/94 and 22/95), is annulled. Reasoning A. 1. The Society of Ecologists of Slovenia states in the initiative for the assessment of the constitutionality and legality of the impugned building plan that it is a planned and serious intervention in space which, because of the natural attributes (spring water, wetlands and catchment area for Bled lake) requires a much more considered approach, in which the report on the state of the environment as determined by the Environmental Protection Act, is the document starting point. In its opinion, the adopted building plan is also not harmonised with the planning components of the long term plan of the municipality of Radovljica and the medium term plan of the municipality of Radovljica, or its amendments and supplements. In the original text of the long-term plan, the disputed region is claimed to have been classified in the first region of agricultural land, which is legally protected, but in later amendments, through the procedure of amending the planning documents, this land was reclassified into the second region of agricultural land.
  • Annual Report 2011

    Annual Report 2011

    RENEWED FOR THE FUTURE. Annual Report 2011 Sava Group Annual Report 2011 Annual report for Sava d.d. and annual report for the Sava Group Report by the Supervisory Board of Sava d.d. Independent auditor’s report for Sava d.d. and independent auditor’s report for the Sava Group Index INTRODUCTION INDEX 1. Significant data and indicators 6 2. Company details 7 3. Organisational structure of the Sava Group 8 3.1. About the Sava Group 8 3.2. About Sava d.d. 8 3.3. Composition of the Sava Group 9 3.4. Divisions of the Sava Group 10 4. Overview of significant events and achievements 11 4.1. Significant events and achievements in the period January-December 2011 11 4.2. Significant events and achievements in 2012 – after the accounting period 13 5. Report by the President of the Management Board 14 6. Management and governing bodies 18 6.1. Presentation of the Management Board 18 6.2. Presentation of the Supervisory Board 19 7. Report by the Supervisory Board of Sava d.d. 22 8. Corporate governance system 32 9. Risk management 42 9.1. Goal, organisation and methodology of risk management 42 9.2. More important risks in 2011 42 9.3. Anticipated risks at the global level and their impact on the operation of the Sava Group 45 10. Financial management 46 BUSINESS ANALYSIS 1. Signing the annual report and its components for Sava d.d. and the Sava Group for 2011 52 ANNUAL REPORT 2011 2. The Sava share and ownership structure with the calendar of significant 53 announcements by Sava d.d.
  • List of Confirmed Participants

    List of Confirmed Participants

    List of Confirmed Participants by alphabetic order of surnames Abadjiev, Dimitar Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Embassy of the Republic of Bulgaria to the Republic of Slovenia, BULGARIA Abdul Rahman, Eirliani Executive Director, YAKIN (Youth, Adult survivors & Kin In Need), SINGAPORE Abdullah, Bahaa Member of the Board - CFO, Iskraemeco, d.d., EGYPT Abdulraheem, Misitura Chargé d´Affaires a.i., Embassy of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, NIGERIA Abela, Carmelo Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Promotion of the Republic of Malta, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade Promotion, MALTA Adlešič, Darja Ministry of economic development and technology, SLOVENIA Agotha, Anthony Cabinet Member, European Commission Ahlawat, Somveer Assistant Attache, Embassy of India, INDIA Akbar, M. J. Minister of State for External Affairs, Government of India, INDIA Akçapar, Burak Director General, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, TURKEY Akrapovič, Matej CFO, Akrapovic d.d., SLOVENIA Aksen, Serhat Deputy Director General-EFGY, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, TURKEY Al Hussein, Zeid Ra'ad United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Al Sheikh, Hisham Embassy of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, SAUDI ARABIA Alberti, Laurent Head of the Germany and Alpine and Adriatic Europe Department, French Ministry For Europe and Foreign Affairs, FRANCE Albreht, Matjaž Executive Director, ALTA Invest, investment services, Inc., SLOVENIA Alipiev, Georgi Deputy Minister of Tourism of the Republic of Bulgaria, Ministry of Tourism of the Republic of Bulgaria, BULGARIA
  • The Influence of the Political Environment and Destination Governance on Sustainable Tourism Development: the Case of Bled, Slovenia

    The Influence of the Political Environment and Destination Governance on Sustainable Tourism Development: the Case of Bled, Slovenia

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Greenwich Academic Literature Archive Please cite as Please check if the paper has already been published in a printed journal JOST. RESEARCH ARTICLE The Influence of the Political Environment and Destination Governance on Sustainable Tourism Development: The Case of Bled, Slovenia Tanja Mihalič1, Tina Šegota2, Ljubica Knežević Cvelbar3 and Kir Kuščer4 aFaculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 1Tel. +386 1 5892 496; [email protected] 2Tel. +386 1 5892 511; [email protected] 3Tel. +386 1 5892 497; [email protected] 4Tel. +386 1 5892 750; [email protected] Tanja Mihalič, PhD, is a full-time professor of tourism at the Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana and the head of its Tourism Institute. Her research interests include tourism economics, environmental economics, policy and sustainable tourism development. She is a member of the UN WTO World Committee on Tourism Ethics and member of the executive body of the International Association of Tourism Economics (IATE). Tina Šegota is a teaching assistant and PhD candidate at the Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana. Her research interests include seasonality, sustainable tourism development, tourism impacts on the quality of life, and advertising and consumer behaviour in tourism. Ljubica Knežević Cvelbar, PhD, is an associate professor at the Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana, and a visiting professor at numerous universities around the world. She has been involved in more than 30 research projects, including ones involving EU funds and UNDP grants.
  • Carrying Capacity Methodology for Tourism

    Carrying Capacity Methodology for Tourism

    Carrying capacity methodology for tourism Targeted Analysis Case study annex Case study annex This targeted analysis activity is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Authors Bernd Schuh, Martyna Derszniak-Noirjean, Roland Gaugitsch, ÖIR GmbH (Austria) Sabine Sedlacek, Christian Weismayer, Bozana Zekan, Ulrich Gunter, Daniel Dan, Lyndon Nixon Modul University Vienna GmbH (Austria) Tanja Mihalič, Kir Kuščer, University of Ljubljana, School of Economics and Business (Slovenia) Miša Novak, Miša Novak s.p. ALOHAS (Slovenia) Case study authors Bled: Miša Novak, Miša Novak s.p. ALOHAS (Slovenia) Brežice: Kir Kuščer, University of Ljubljana, School of Economics and Business (Slovenia) Divača: Tanja Mihalic, University of Ljubljana, School of Economics and Business (Slovenia) Gorizia – Nova Gorica: Bozana Zekan, Christian Weismayer, Modul University Vienna GmbH (Austria) Advisory Group ESPON EGTC: Sandra Di Biaggio (Senior Project Expert – Policy Analysis and Project Develop- ment), György Alföldy (Financial Expert) Information on ESPON and its projects can be found on www.espon.eu. The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This delivery exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON, 2020 Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg.
  • Some Fact About Slovenia

    Some Fact About Slovenia

    Better Electro World Erasmus+ Project ID: 2017-1-TR01-KA202-045805 First project LTT activity Celje, Slovenia, 19th – 23th March 2018 SOME FACT ABOUT SLOVENIA SOME FACT ABOUT SLOVENIA Slovenia is a country in central Europe that was part of Yugoslavia for most of the 20th century. It is a small but topographically diverse country made up of portions of four major European geographic landscapes—the European Alps, the karstic Dinaric Alps, the Pannonian and Danubian lowlands and hills, and the Mediterranean coast. Easily accessible mountain passes (now superseded by tunnels) through Slovenia’s present-day territory have long served as routes for those crossing the Mediterranean and transalpine regions of Europe. The population in Slovenia is around 2.000.000 people. Native language is Slovenian. Money currency is Euro. Capital city is Ljubljana. The Slovenes are a South Slavic people with a unique language. For most of its history, Slovenia was largely controlled by the Habsburgs of Austria, who ruled the Holy Roman Empire and its successor states, the Austrian Empire and Austria-Hungary; in addition, coastal portions were held for a time by Venice. As part of Yugoslavia, Slovenia came under communist rule for the bulk of the post-World War II period. With the dissolution of the Yugoslav federation in 1991, a multiparty democratic political system emerged. Slovenia’s economic prosperity in the late 20th century attracted hundreds of thousands of migrants from elsewhere in the Balkans. In the early 21st century, Slovenia integratedeconomically and politically with western Europe, joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as well as the European Union in 2004.
  • Supporting Communities Towards Sustainable Urban Development

    Supporting Communities Towards Sustainable Urban Development

    IPoP – Institute for Spatial Policies is an advocacy, consulting and research organisation in the field of sustainable spatial and urban development. We support communities towards sustainable urban development by focusing on four fields of action: Public participation, Sustainable mobility, Placemaking and Urban policy. Our actions are grounded on the values of equality, sustainability, cooperation, quality of life and vitality. We read, listen and research, in order to detect key topics and trends. Then, we develop new solutions with the aim to trigger social change. We want to inspire others with our actions and be part of a wider movement, transforming the world through changes in local environments. We work in partnerships, networks, coalitions, with communities and clients. We always try to build meaningful relations. IPoP was officially founded as a private non-profit organization in 2006. We are an experienced team of ten who have come together from different backgrounds: architecture, landscape architecture, urban planning, sociology, geography, translation. Our efforts for the common good have been recognized by the Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning, granting us the status of a non-governmental organization working in the public interest in the field of environmental protection in 2014 and in the field of spatial planning in 2019. Since 2008, the institute has been registered as a research organization at the Slovenian Research Agency. Supporting communities towards sustainable urban development IPoP – Institute for Spatial Policies, Ljubljana Tržaška 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia www.ipop.si Public participation is a communication channel that connects the public and the decision makers. It is an indispensable part of the democratic political system and spatial planning.
  • Green Tourism – Bled

    Green Tourism – Bled

    GREEN BLED Sankt Petersburg, 2nd December – 7th December 2017 „The Carniola County holds no nicer place than this second Eden, full of charm and grace.” France Prešeren (1800 – 1849), The Baptism at Savica GEOGRAPHICAL POSITION ONE OF THE MOST POPULAR ALPINE RESORTS, SUROUNDED BY WATER. CLIMATE AND LAKE BLED • MILD SUB-ALPINE CLIMATE • 2.120 m long • LONGEST SWIMMING SEASON OF ANY • 1.380 m wide ALPINE RESORT • more than 30 m deep • AVERAGE MONTHLY TEMPERATURE: • summer: 26 °C • July: +18,7 °C • winter: frozen • Januar: -1,2 °C LAKE BLED PROTECTED AREA • ARCHITECTURAL IDENTITY OF ALPINE RESORT • CULTURAL LANDSCAPE • NATURAL VALUES (THE RICHNESS OF THE WATERS AND FORESTS AND GREAT BIODIVERSITY) ABOUT TWO THIRDS OF THE MUNICIPAL AREA COVERS AT LEAST ONE OF THE PROTECTIVE REGIME: • UNITS WITH THE STATUS OF A CULTURAL MONUMENT OF LOCAL IMPORTANCE • A MONUMENT OF A NATIONAL IMPORTANCE SOCIO – ECONOMIC DESCRIPTION • GREAT STRATEGIC NUMBER OF INHABITANTS THROUGH THE HISTORY POSITION – EARLY 9000 SETTLEMENTS 8000 • 8.000 INHABITANTS 7000 • DENSLY POPULATED: 6000 102 people / km2 5000 • NATURAL INCREASE: 4000 +2,8 3000 • MIGRATION SALDO: - 2000 10,6 1000 • AVERAGE AGE: 44,3 0 1869 1880 1890 1900 1910 1931 1948 1953 1961 1971 1981 1991 2002 THE MOST IMPORTANT ECONOMIC BRANCH IS TOURISM • FIRST VISITORS – Changing the number of guests in Bled throughout history PILGRIMS 400000 • 1850 – ARNOLD 350000 RIKLI 300000 • FIRST WORLD WAR 250000 • 1922 – SUMMER 200000 RESIDENCE OF KING 150000 ALEKSANDER KARAĐORĐEVIĆ (SHS) 100000 • SECOND WORLD WAR 50000 0 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 . TOURISM TODAY • NEARLY 1.000.000 OVERNIGHTS IN 2017 • 8.000 BEDS FOR TOURISTS IN MUNICIPALITY OF BLED • PLACE FOR SEVERAL INTERNATIONAL SPORT EVENTS.