DOCSLIB.ORG

28 WGEF Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
28 WGEF Report ICES WGEF REPORT 2016 | 639 26 Other issues 26.1 Data needed to assess the bycatch of deep water sharks and possible mitigation measures to reduce bycatch 26.1.1 Background In the past, deep-sea sharks were commonly caught in European mixed deep-water fisheries operating along the Northeast Atlantic continental margin, mainly by deep- water trawlers in the ICES Subareas 4, 5, 6, 7 and 12 and by deep-water longliners in ICES Subareas 8, 9 and 10. The most important species in commercial landings were leafscale gulper shark Centrophorus squamosus, Portuguese dogfish Centroscymnus coelolepis and kitefin shark Dalatias licha. However, many other deep-water shark spe- cies were caught as bycatch, depending on the area and depth of exploitation. In general, the survival of deep-water sharks after commercial fishing operations is considered to be very low. Specimens of leafscale gulper shark and Portuguese dogfish caught by commercial fishing operations generally arrive dead onboard, highlighting that the discard survival is extremely low for the two species. The only indication of some survivorship of deep-water sharks in the Northeast Atlan- tic was observed for leafscale gulper shark caught during a scientific tagging pro- gramme. The survey used deep-water longlines which were laid at depths ranging from 900–1100 m (Rodríguez-Cabello and Sánchez, 2014). In this study, the soak time was restricted to 2–3 hours and the lines were hauled back at a slow speed (0.4–0.5 m.s– 1). It is important to note that these fishing practices are different from those used in commercial fisheries. Similarly, Brooks et al. (2015) also reported some survival of deep-water sharks, but these were also taken in scientific field studies. 26.1.2 Life history and population dynamics Life history characteristics of deep-water sharks typically include a slow growth rate, late age-at-maturity and low fecundity, indicating long generation times (Garcia et al., 2008; Graham and Daley, 2011). Their populations are considered highly vulnerable to commercial exploitation and exhibit low recovery rates when depleted (Pratt and Ca- sey, 1990; Simpfendorfer and Kyne, 2009). Due to their low biological productivity and risk of population decline after exploitation, there are worldwide concerns for their conservation (Kyne and Simpfendorfer, 2010). These concerns were the basis for the adoption, in 2005, of an EU TAC for deep-water sharks which was reduced to zero in 2010 and has remained at zero since then. Despite their overall low resilience to commercial exploitation, species present differ- ent life history traits and dynamics, and these differences should be considered in the assessment and the management of the different species. For example, some species are known to segregate by size, sex and/or maturity stage with different habitat re- quirements during their life (Moura et al., 2014). Table 26.1 summarizes some biological and ecological information of the two most commonly caught species, illustrating their likely different responses to commercial exploitation. 640 | ICES WGEF REPORT 2016 Table 26.1. Summary of the main ecological and biological aspects described for the Portuguese dogfish and the leafscale gulper shark. Leafscale gulper Portuguese dogfish shark (GUQ) (CYO) Comments Overall Worldwide Worldwide Distribution NE Atlantic Mainly caught Commonly caught as There is bathymetric overlap distribution between 600 and 1500 deep as 2000 m, with between the two species, but m deep, with occasional records CYO reaches deeper waters. occasional records down to 2800 m [2]. CYO presents widespread down to 3300 m. For the NE and CE gene mixing across the There is apparently Atlantic there is distribution area. no genetic structure apparently no genetic in the NE Atlantic [1]. structure [4]. NE Atlantic Few records of Few records of For both species, the reasons Ontogenic neonates and small neonates and small for the scarcity of young are stages immature specimens immature specimens not clear, but it is likely that distribution (juveniles) [2]. (juveniles) [2]. they concentrate in nurseries Immature females All adult outside the areas already predominate over reproductive stages surveyed. mature females. can be found within GUQ females are less the same dispersed than males. The Mature males are more broadly geographical region latter is supported by the distributed than of the NE Atlantic [2]. observation of high levels of mature females [2]. male-mediated gene flow [1]. Pregnant females To complete the life cycle GUQ occur at specific females undertake large scale areas, such as off migrations to give birth at Madeira Archipelago specific areas. and at the norther CYO is able to complete the part of NE Atlantic [2, whole life cycle within 3]. Pregnant females different areas of the NE are spatially Atlantic. segregated from the rest of the population. ICES WGEF REPORT 2016 | 641 Reproduction Early ripe follicles are After mating, the GUQ is a continuous breeder present in the ovaries female gonad (i.e. vitellogenesis proceeds in of females in late regresses to a parallel with gestation) with a pregnancy stages. developing stage that unique reproductive season Ovaries of early stage lasts, at least, 1 year All GUQ fully developed pregnant females do [5]. follicles are ovulated not present atretic Ovaries of late-stage CYO is not a continuous follicles. pregnant females breeder, after parturition Ovulation is maximal have a predominance females are likely to enter into during the second of atresia. a resting period quarter of the year Two main ovulation CYO has two ovulation [5]. periods (March-April periods in each year. High frequency of and October- Only a fraction of the mature males in a spent November) [5]. females of CYO is condition observed Significant increase of reproductively active in each from September to females in the first reproductive period October uterine stage and of females carrying the largest intra-uterine embryos in March - April and in October- November [5]. During those periods adult females in different maturity stages coexist. Growth The estimated ages of Estimates of Von The growth rates of both CYO specimens caught to Bertalanffy and GUQ are very low. the west of the British parameters were: Isles varied from 21– growth rate (k) = 70 years. 0.007; L∞ = 128.4 cm Absence of small [7]. specimens restricted the fitting of the growth model [6]. [1] Veríssimo et al. (2012); [2] Moura et al. (2014); [3] Severino et al. (2009); [4] Veríssimo et al. (2011); [5] Figueiredo et al. (2008); [6] Clarke et al. (2002); [7] Moura et al. (2011) 26.1.3 Stock assessment In recent years, both fishery-dependent and fishery-independent data on deep-water sharks taken by Northeast Atlantic deep-water fleets have been limited and considered insufficient to monitor species abundance or biomass trends. These deficiencies are ex- acerbated by the global distribution of some species that occur in waters under many jurisdictions, and also by their specific reproductive strategies. As a consequence of all these data deficiencies, attempts to develop adequate quantitative stock assessments for deep-sea sharks have fallen short of expectations. 26.1.4 Fishery-dependent data Historical, EU fishery data available are restricted to deep-sea sharks of commercial importance, and are of limited use due to the lack of taxonomic and geographic preci- sion. European historical landing data on deep-water sharks are problematic, as for many countries (excluding Portugal) landings were often reported in generic catego- 642 | ICES WGEF REPORT 2016 ries, such as “various sharks nei”. Despite the efforts to retrospectively split the histor- ical landing data into species, no objective rule was considered satisfactory (ICES, 2011). In Portuguese mainland waters (ICES Division 9.a), temporal abundance trends for fe- male Portuguese dogfish for the period 1989–2008 were modelled by a state space model with a Bayesian approach (ICES, 2011; Figueiredo et al., 2013). The model was benchmarked in 2010 (ICES, 2011) and the results showed that at the end of the time series population abundance of both recruited juveniles (70 cm < total length < 101 cm) and adults (total length > 101 cm, i.e., with length larger than the length-at-first ma- turity) were stable (Figure 26.1, upper row). It was also observed that catches of these two life history stages decreased (Figure 26.1, lower row). Both results suggested that the fishing impact on the population inhabiting Portuguese mainland waters was low (Figueiredo et al., 2013). Figure 26.1. Portuguese dogfish – female population abundance estimates (upper row) and esti- mated catch (lower row) in numbers for non-recruited juveniles (left), recruited juveniles (middle) and adults (right), for the first scenario, and their respective 95% credible intervals (doted lines). In the last ten years, and due to the EU restriction measures, registered catches of deep- sea sharks in the NE Atlantic have declined greatly. At the present time, although dis- carding is known to occur in existing deep-water fisheries, these have not been fully quantified. Preliminary ICES estimates are considered uncertain (ICES, 2015). 26.1.5 Fishery-independent data Some fishery-independent data are available but these are often temporally irregular. Fishery-independent data are available from Irish, Scottish and Spanish trawl surveys but none have sufficient geographic and bathymetric coverage to ensure the sampling of all demographic components of the populations. With the exception of the Scottish survey, the remaining surveys are represented by a non-continuous and short time- series (ICES, 2011). The fishery-independent data collected from the Marine Scotland Science deep-water survey in Subarea 6 are available since 1998, at depths ranging from 300–2040 m. Abun- dance indices of leafscale gulper shark and Portuguese dogfish were estimated from ICES WGEF REPORT 2016 | 643 2000 onwards, because only since then were the surveys considered standardized (Fig- ure 26.2).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to the Classification of Elasmobranchs
    An introduction to the classification of elasmobranchs 17 Rekha J. Nair and P.U Zacharia Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi-682 018 Introduction eyed, stomachless, deep-sea creatures that possess an upper jaw which is fused to its cranium (unlike in sharks). The term Elasmobranchs or chondrichthyans refers to the The great majority of the commercially important species of group of marine organisms with a skeleton made of cartilage. chondrichthyans are elasmobranchs. The latter are named They include sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras. These for their plated gills which communicate to the exterior by organisms are characterised by and differ from their sister 5–7 openings. In total, there are about 869+ extant species group of bony fishes in the characteristics like cartilaginous of elasmobranchs, with about 400+ of those being sharks skeleton, absence of swim bladders and presence of five and the rest skates and rays. Taxonomy is also perhaps to seven pairs of naked gill slits that are not covered by an infamously known for its constant, yet essential, revisions operculum. The chondrichthyans which are placed in Class of the relationships and identity of different organisms. Elasmobranchii are grouped into two main subdivisions Classification of elasmobranchs certainly does not evade this Holocephalii (Chimaeras or ratfishes and elephant fishes) process, and species are sometimes lumped in with other with three families and approximately 37 species inhabiting species, or renamed, or assigned to different families and deep cool waters; and the Elasmobranchii, which is a large, other taxonomic groupings. It is certain, however, that such diverse group (sharks, skates and rays) with representatives revisions will clarify our view of the taxonomy and phylogeny in all types of environments, from fresh waters to the bottom (evolutionary relationships) of elasmobranchs, leading to a of marine trenches and from polar regions to warm tropical better understanding of how these creatures evolved.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Swimming Speed of the Pacific Sleeper Shark Somniosus
    Journal of the Marine First record of swimming speed of the Pacific Biological Association of the United Kingdom sleeper shark Somniosus pacificus using a baited camera array cambridge.org/mbi Yoshihiro Fujiwara , Yasuyuki Matsumoto, Takumi Sato, Masaru Kawato and Shinji Tsuchida Original Article Research Institute for Global Change (RIGC), Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Yokosuka, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan Cite this article: Fujiwara Y, Matsumoto Y, Sato T, Kawato M, Tsuchida S (2021). First record of swimming speed of the Pacific Abstract sleeper shark Somniosus pacificus using a baited camera array. Journal of the Marine The Pacific sleeper shark Somniosus pacificus is one of the largest predators in deep Suruga Biological Association of the United Kingdom Bay, Japan. A single individual of the sleeper shark (female, ∼300 cm in total length) was 101, 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/ observed with two baited camera systems deployed simultaneously on the deep seafloor in S0025315421000321 the bay. The first arrival was recorded 43 min after the deployment of camera #1 on 21 July 2016 at a depth of 609 m. The shark had several remarkable features, including the Received: 26 July 2020 Revised: 14 April 2021 snout tangled in a broken fishing line, two torn anteriormost left-gill septums, and a parasitic Accepted: 14 April 2021 copepod attached to each eye. The same individual appeared at camera #2, which was First published online: 18 May 2021 deployed at a depth of 603 m, ∼37 min after it disappeared from camera #1 view. Finally, the same shark returned to camera #1 ∼31 min after leaving camera #2.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Swimming Speed of the Pacific Sleeper Shark Somniosus
    Journal of the Marine First record of swimming speed of the Pacific Biological Association of the United Kingdom sleeper shark Somniosus pacificus using a baited camera array cambridge.org/mbi Yoshihiro Fujiwara , Yasuyuki Matsumoto, Takumi Sato, Masaru Kawato and Shinji Tsuchida Original Article Research Institute for Global Change (RIGC), Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Yokosuka, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan Cite this article: Fujiwara Y, Matsumoto Y, Sato T, Kawato M, Tsuchida S (2021). First record of swimming speed of the Pacific Abstract sleeper shark Somniosus pacificus using a baited camera array. Journal of the Marine The Pacific sleeper shark Somniosus pacificus is one of the largest predators in deep Suruga Biological Association of the United Kingdom Bay, Japan. A single individual of the sleeper shark (female, ∼300 cm in total length) was 101, 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/ observed with two baited camera systems deployed simultaneously on the deep seafloor in S0025315421000321 the bay. The first arrival was recorded 43 min after the deployment of camera #1 on 21 July 2016 at a depth of 609 m. The shark had several remarkable features, including the Received: 26 July 2020 Revised: 14 April 2021 snout tangled in a broken fishing line, two torn anteriormost left-gill septums, and a parasitic Accepted: 14 April 2021 copepod attached to each eye. The same individual appeared at camera #2, which was First published online: 18 May 2021 deployed at a depth of 603 m, ∼37 min after it disappeared from camera #1 view. Finally, the same shark returned to camera #1 ∼31 min after leaving camera #2.
    [Show full text]
  • And Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations College of Science and Health Spring 6-14-2019 Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications Phillip C. Sternes DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Sternes, Phillip C., "Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications" (2019). College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations. 327. https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd/327 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Science and Health at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science June 2019 By Phillip C. Sternes Department of Biological Sciences College of Science and Health DePaul University Chicago, Illinois Table of Contents Table of Contents.............................................................................................................................ii List of Tables..................................................................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • Migratory Sharks Complete 3 0 0.Pdf
    CMS Technical Series No. 15 Review of Migratory Chondrichthyan Fishes Review of Migratory Chondrichthyan Fishes Prepared by the Shark Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission on behalf of the CMS Secretariat • CMS Technical Series No. 15 CMS Technical UNEP/CMS Secretariat Public Information Hermann-Ehlers-Str. 10 53113 Bonn, Germany T. +49 228 815-2401/02 F. +49 228 815-2449 www.cms.int Review of Chondrichthyan Fishes IUCN Species Survival Commission’s Shark Specialist Group December 2007 Published by IUCN–The World Conservation Union, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). Review of Chondrichthyan Fishes. 2007. Prepared by the Shark Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission on behalf of the CMS Secretariat. Cover photographs © J. Stafford-Deitsch. Front cover: Isurus oxyrinchus Shortfin mako shark. Back cover, from left: Sphyrna mokarran Great hammerhead shark, Carcharodon carcharias Great white shark, Prionace glauca Blue shark. Maps from Collins Field Guide to Sharks of the World. 2005. IUCN and UNEP/ CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 72 pages. Technical Report Series 15. This publication was prepared and printed with funding from the CMS Secretariat and Department for the Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, UK. Produced by: Naturebureau, Newbury, UK. Printed by: Information Press, Oxford, UK. Printed on: 115gsm Allegro Demi-matt produced from sustainable sources. © 2007 IUCN–The World Conservation Union / Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sharks of North America
    THE SHARKS OF NORTH AMERICA JOSE I. CASTRO COLOR ILLUSTRATIONS BY DIANE ROME PEEBLES OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS CONTENTS Foreword, by Eugenie Clark v Mosaic gulper shark, Centrophorus tesselatus 79 Preface vii Little gulper shark, Centrophorus uyato 81 Acknowledgments ix Minigulper, Centrophorus sp. A 84 Slender gulper, Centrophorus sp. B 85 Introduction 3 Birdbeak dogfish, Deania calcea 86 How to use this book 3 Arrowhead dogfish, Deaniaprofundorum 89 Description of species accounts 3 Illustrations 6 Family Etmopteridae, The Black Dogfishes Glossary 7 and Lanternsharks 91 Bibliography 7 Black dogfish, Centroscyllium fabricii 93 The knowledge and study of sharks 7 Pacific black dogfish, Centroscyllium nigrum 96 The shark literature 8 Emerald or blurred lanternshark, Etmopterus bigelowi 98 Lined lanternshark, Etmopterus bullisi 101 Broadband lanternshark, Etmopterus gracilispinis 103 A KEY TO THE FAMILIES OF Caribbean lanternshark, Etmopterus hillianus 105 NORTH AMERICAN SHARKS 11 Great lanternshark, Etmopterusprinceps 107 Fringefin lanternshark, Etmopterus schultzi 110 SPECIES ACCOUNTS 19 Green lanternshark, Etmopterus virens 112 Family Chlamydoselachidae, The Frill Shark 21 Family Somniosidae, The Sleeper Sharks 115 Frill shark, Chlamydoselachus anguineus 22 Portuguese shark, Centroscymnus coelolepis 117 Roughskin dogfish, Centroscymnus owstoni 120 Family Hexanchidae, The Cowsharks 26 Velvet dogfish, Zameus squamulosus \T1 Sharpnose sevengill, or perlon shark, Heptranchias Greenland shark, Somniosus microcephalus 124 perlo 28 Pacific sleeper
    [Show full text]
  • Etmopterus Lantern Sharks Use Coelenterazine As the Substrate for Their Luciferin-Luciferase Bioluminescence System
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.01.433353; this version posted March 8, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Etmopterus lantern sharks use coelenterazine as the substrate for their luciferin-luciferase bioluminescence system Gaku Mizuno1,*, Daichi Yano1,*, José Paitio1, Hiromitsu Endo2 & Yuichi Oba1 1Department of Environmental Biology, Chubu University, Kasugai 487-8501, Japan. 2Laboratory of Marine Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Kochi University, Kochi 780-8520, Japan. *These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Y.O. (email: [email protected]) The lantern shark genus Etmopterus is a group of deep-sea bioluminescent fishes. They emit blue light mainly from the ventral body surface, and the primary biological function is considered to be for camouflage by counterillumination. In this study, we detected both coelenterazine and coelenterazine-specific luciferase activity in the ventral photophore tissues. The results suggested that bioluminescence in lantern sharks is produced using coelenterazine as the substrate for the luciferin-luciferase reaction. Bioluminescence in cartilaginous fish has been reported in species of the squaliform families Dalatiidae, Etmopteridae, and Somniosidae1,2. They have numerous tiny photophores mainly throughout the ventral body surface, and its biological function is considered to be counterillumination, a strategy for camouflage from predators by cloaking their silhouette and making them indistinguishable from environmental downwelling light3,4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Status of Pelagic Sharks and Rays
    The Conservation Status of The Conservation Status of Pelagic Sharks and Rays The Conservation Status of Pelagic Sharks and Rays Pelagic Sharks and Rays Report of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group Pelagic Shark Red List Workshop Report of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group Tubney House, University of Oxford, UK, 19–23 February 2007 Pelagic Shark Red List Workshop Compiled and edited by Tubney House, University of Oxford, UK, 19–23 February 2007 Merry D. Camhi, Sarah V. Valenti, Sonja V. Fordham, Sarah L. Fowler and Claudine Gibson Executive Summary This report describes the results of a thematic Red List Workshop held at the University of Oxford’s Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, UK, in 2007, and incorporates seven years (2000–2007) of effort by a large group of Shark Specialist Group members and other experts to evaluate the conservation status of the world’s pelagic sharks and rays. It is a contribution towards the IUCN Species Survival Commission’s Shark Specialist Group’s “Global Shark Red List Assessment.” The Red List assessments of 64 pelagic elasmobranch species are presented, along with an overview of the fisheries, use, trade, and management affecting their conservation. Pelagic sharks and rays are a relatively small group, representing only about 6% (64 species) of the world’s total chondrichthyan fish species. These include both oceanic and semipelagic species of sharks and rays in all major and Claudine Gibson L. Fowler Sarah Fordham, Sonja V. Valenti, V. Camhi, Sarah Merry D. Compiled and edited by oceans of the world. No chimaeras are known to be pelagic. Experts at the workshop used established criteria and all available information to update and complete global and regional species-specific Red List assessments following IUCN protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • Centrophoridae
    click for previous page 386 Sharks CENTROPHORIDAE Gulper sharks iagnostic characters: Small to moderately large sharks, with cylindrical or slightly compressed bodies, Dwithout ridges between pectoral and pelvic fins and without precaudal pits and caudal keels. Head with 5 gill slits, all anterior to pectoral fins, the fifth not abruptly longer than the others; spiracles always present, large and just behind eyes; eyes on sides of head, without nictitating eyelids. Snout short to elongated, broad, flattened, not formed as a rostral saw; no barbels on snout; nostrils wide-spaced, internarial width greater than nostril width; mouth short and nearly transverse, lips smooth; teeth strong-cusped, dissimilar in both jaws, compressed, broad, blade-like, and without cusplets, adjacent teeth imbricated, upper teeth much smaller than lowers. Two dorsal fins with a long strong grooved spine present on their ante- rior margins;dorsal fins large, angular, broad, and with weakly concave posterior margins;first dorsal fin larger or subequal in area to second dorsal fin; origin of first dorsal fin far in front of pelvic-fin origins, over or just be- hind pectoral-fin insertions, and always in front of pectoral-fin free rear tips; no anal fin; caudal fin strongly asymmetrical, with subterminal notch present and with a lower lobe varying from virtually absent to short; pelvic fins subequal to or smaller than second dorsal fin. Dermal denticles close-set, not greatly enlarged and plate-like.Colour: body and fins greyish to blackish brown, without conspicuous black marks and luminescent organs. 2 dorsal fins with grooved spines no nictitating eyelid subterminal notch 5 gill slits, anterior to no anal fin pectoral fin upper and lower teeth of Centrophorus acus Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Gulper sharks mostly occur in deep water near the bottom on the continental and insular slopes from 200 to at least 2 400 m, with one photographed from a bathyscaphe on the ocean floor below 4 000 m and another in the open ocean between the surface and 1 250 m depth in water nearly 4 000 m deep.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Species List for Sharks Caught in Iccat Fisheries
    SCRS/2014/027 Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 71(6): 2557-2561 (2015) UPDATED SPECIES LIST FOR SHARKS CAUGHT IN ICCAT FISHERIES Paul de Bruyn1 and Carlos Palma 1 SUMMARY This document presents a brief discussion of the increasing list of species being reported to the ICCAT secretariat, together with a proposal for complete taxonomic classification aimed to be revised and approved by the Sharks Working Group. RÉSUMÉ Ce document présente une brève discussion sur la liste croissante des espèces qui sont déclarées au Secrétariat de l'ICCAT, conjointement avec une proposition visant à ce que le Groupe d'espèces sur les requins révise et approuve une classification taxonomique complète. RESUMEN Este documento presenta un breve debate sobre la lista cada vez mayor de especies que se comunican a la Secretaría de ICCAT, junto con una propuesta para completar la clasificación taxonómica con miras a su revisión y aprobación por el Grupo de especies sobre tiburones. KEYWORDS Sharks, Rays, Taxonomy Overview of ICCAT species According to the ICCAT website (http://www.iccat.int/en/introduction.htm), about 30 species are of direct concern to ICCAT: Atlantic bluefin (Thunnus thynnus thynnus), skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis), yellowfin (Thunnus albacares), albacore (Thunnus alalunga) and bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus); swordfish (Xiphias gladius); billfishes such as white marlin (Tetrapturus albidus), blue marlin (Makaira nigricans), sailfish (Istiophorus albicans) and spearfish (Tetrapturus pfluegeri); mackerels such as spotted Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus) and king mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla); and, small tunas like black skipjack (Euthynnus alletteratus), frigate tuna (Auxis thazard), and Atlantic bonito (Sarda sarda). Through the Convention, it is established that ICCAT is the only fisheries organization that can undertake the range of work required for the study and management of tunas and tuna-like fishes in the Atlantic Ocean and adjacent seas.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioluminescent-Like Squamation in the Galeomorph Shark Apristurus Ampliceps (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii)
    Contributions to Zoology, 87 (3) 187-196 (2018) Bioluminescent-like squamation in the galeomorph shark Apristurus ampliceps (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Humberto G. Ferrón1,3, María Victoria Paredes-Aliaga1, Carlos Martínez-Pérez1,2, Héctor Botella1 1 Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, 2 Catedrático José Beltrán Martínez, Paterna 46980, Valencia, Spain. 2 School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom. 3 E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: bioluminescence, squamation pattern, morphometrics, discriminant analysis, Galeomorphii, Apristurus ampliceps. Abstract Introduction Galeomorph sharks constitute the most taxonomically and Bioluminescence is widespread in deep-water ecologically diverse superorder of living selachians. Despite marine organisms, being present from bacteria comprising several typically deep-water taxa, no bioluminescent species have been reported in this group so far. Interestingly, to vertebrates, fulfilling diverse crucial functions the study of shark squamation has been revealed in recent years (Haddock et al., 2009; Widder, 2010). Among living to be a good proxy for inferring some ecological aspects of sharks, this adaptation has been documented in three poorly known species. In particular, the high morphological different families (i.e. Dalatiidae, Etmopteriidae specificity of the dermal denticles and the squamation patterns and Somniosidae), all of them belonging to the of all currently-known bioluminescent sharks could constitute a potential tool for predicting bioluminescence in both fossil Superorder Squalomorphii (Straube et al., 2015 and and living taxa. Following this idea, we provide the first references therein). In contrast, no evidence has been evidence supporting the possible existence of bioluminescence reported supporting its occurrence in the Superorder among galeomorph sharks by means of the quantitative Galeomorphii, despite being the most diverse clade study of Apristurus ampliceps squamation pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • 5Th Meeting of the Scientific Committee SC5-DW09 Rev1
    5th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Shanghai, China, 23 - 28 September 2017 SC5-DW09_rev1 Ecosystem approach considerations: Deepwater chondrichthyans (sharks, rays and chimaeras) in the Western SPRFMO Area Clinton Duffy1, Shane Geange1 & Tiffany Bock2 1 Department of Conservation 2 Ministry for Primary Industries 1 23 Aug 2017 SC5-DW09_rev1 1. Purpose of paper This paper provides a characterisation of the catch of chondrichthyans in New Zealand bottom fisheries in the SPRFMO Area and information on potential risks to deepwater chondrichthyan species from SPRFMO bottom fishing. Chondrichthyans, particularly those which predominantly occur or complete most of their lifecycle below 200 m depth, are known to have life history characteristics which make them especially vulnerable to fishing pressure. 2. Background About half of chondrichthyans are considered deepwater species, of which around half are sharks (predominantly squaloid dogfishes, Order Squaliformes, and catsharks, Order Carcharhiniformes, Families Pentanchidae and Scyliorhinidae)), with the remainder being skates (predominantly Arhynchobatidae, Rajidae, and Anacanthobatidae), and holocephalans (Kyne & Simpfendorfer 2007). There are currently 177 species reported from the SPRFMO Area that are known to regularly occur below 200 m depth (Appendix 1). Chondrichthyans generally exhibit relatively slow growth rates, late age at maturity, low fecundity and low natural mortality. Knowledge of the growth and reproductive parameters of most deepwater species is generally poor or completely lacking. For the limited number of deepwater species for which sufficient life history data is available, their estimated intrinsic rebound potential values (i.e., ability of a species to recover from fishing pressure) fall at the lower end of the chondrichthyan productivity scale, and include the lowest levels observed (Kyne & Simpfendorfer 2007).
    [Show full text]