DOCSLIB.ORG

DNM Monthly Network Operations Report (Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis – October 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. TOTAL TRAFFIC....................................................................................................................... 1 2. ATFM DELAY AND ATTRIBUTIONS........................................................................................ 4 3. EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAYS ...................................................................................................... 5 4. AIRPORT/TMA ATFM DELAYS................................................................................................ 9 5. DAILY EVOLUTION.................................................................................................................10 6. ALL AIR TRANSPORT DELAYS (SOURCE: CODA) ............................................................. 11 7. ATFM SLOT ADHERENCE ..................................................................................................... 12 8. SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AND ISSUES .................................................................................... 12 9. NM ADDED VALUE................................................................................................................. 13 NOTICE: All figures presented in this report are for the geographical area that is within Network Manager’s responsibility (NM area). See ACC coverage on page 3. 1. TOTAL TRAFFIC Last 13 months average daily traffic Average daily traffic for last 5 Years 32000 32000 30000 30000 28000 28000 26000 26000 24000 24000 22000 22000 20000 20000 18000 16000 28004 24756 22759 22695 23260 24991 26210 27884 29893 30024 29617 29673 27450 JUL JAN FEB SEP APR JUN OCT MAR MAY AUG NOV DEC 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 JUL JAN FEB SEP OCT APR JUN OCT NOV DEC MAR MAY AUG Traffic decreased by 2% compared to October 2011. Traffic in October 2012 was still above the 2009 level but it was below the 2010 level for the second time since February 2012. Average daily traffic in October for last 5 Years 12 months rolling traffic trend forecast date : 2012-09 4% 29000 3.2% 3.1% 2.9% 2.5% 3% 28500 1. 9 % 1. 6 % 27835 2% 28000 27500 1% 0.2% 27000 0% -0.5%-0.6% -0.9% -1.2% 26500 -1% -1.7% 28465 26895 27911 28004 27450 -1.9% 26000 -2% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 JUL SEP JAN FEB OCT OCT APR JUN AUG NOV DEC MAR MAY October 2012 traffic was significantly below the forecast. This graph shows the variation in total traffic for the last 12-month period relative to that for the 12-month period before. The total traffic from November 2011 to October 2012 decreased by 1.9% relative to that from November 2010 to October 2011. DNM Network Operations Report – Analysis - October 2012 1 Eight of the top 10 airports had less traffic compared to October 2011 (Paris CDG, London Heathrow, Amsterdam, Munich, Madrid Barajas, Rome Fiumicino, Barcelona and Vienna). Frankfurt and Istanbul Ataturk airports had increased traffic. The largest decrease was at Budapest Ferihegy (-20.1 %) airport as a result of Malév Hungarian Airlines ceasing operations in February 2012. The next largest decrease was at Las Palmas airport (-17.1%) as a result of Islas Airways ceasing operations on 16 October 2012, followed by Prague (-14.6%) airport. The 12% traffic decrease at Madrid Barajas airport is the result of overall traffic reduction in Spain in conjunction with Spanair cessation of operations in January 2012. The largest traffic increases were at Istanbul Sabiha (+15.2%), Istanbul Ataturk (+11.5%), Dublin (+11%) and Toulouse Blagnac (+10.9%) airports. The growth in Istanbul airports is in line with the ongoing traffic growth of Turkish Airlines and Pegasus Airlines. With the exception of Alitalia, the traffic for the top 10 air operators (Lufthansa, Ryanair, Easyjet, Air France, Turkish Airlines, SAS, Air Berlin, British Airways and KLM) increased in October 2012 compared to October 2011. Airline consolidation and restructuring explains most of the significant traffic decreases and increases: Air Nostrum (-33%), Czech Airlines (-32.9 %) and Finnair (-14.6%), United Airlines (+116.4%), BAW shuttle (+34.4% due to the cessation of BMIbaby operations in September) and Monarch airlines (+19%). Aeroflot Russian (+28.9%) and Loganair (+20%) recorded a real traffic growth. “Unidentified operators” (mainly General Aviation) decreased by 2% in October 2012. DNM Network Operations Report – Analysis - October 2012 2 Traffic increased significantly at Makedonia, Dnipropetrovsk, Dublin and Stavanger ACCs. Malta recorded an increase of 33.5% compared to October 2011 as a recovery from last year’s Libyan airspace closure. Traffic decreased significantly at Santa Maria, Canarias, Yerevan, Brindisi, Tampere and Budapest ACCs. DNM Network Operations Report – Analysis - October 2012 3 2. ATFM DELAY AND ATTRIBUTIONS Average daily ATFM delays EN-ROUTE Average daily ATFM delays EN-ROUTE AIRPORT/TMA AIRPORT/ TMA 70000 45000 38487 58861 40000 60000 51905 35000 50000 40892 30000 40000 38121 34114 34110 33623 30592 29434 25000 20374 30000 22810 20000 19761 16 3 8 2 16875 14 2 0 9 20000 15103 15000 10 0 0 0 10000 0 5000 65.4% 34.6% 53.6% 46.4% 0 JUL JAN FEB SEP OCT APR JUN OCT NOV DEC MAR MAY AUG 2 0 1110 2 0 12 10 The average daily ATFM delays decreased from 58861 minutes Compared to October 2011, ATFM delays decreased by 48 % in in October 2011 to 30592 minutes in October 2012. October 2012. The main reduction was in the en-route area particularly in Athens, Makedonia, Nicosia and Madrid ACCs. Frankfurt airport also experienced a significant reduction in delays compared to October last year. Monthly ATFM delays trend Proportion of ATFM delay in October 2012 20% 10.5% AIRPORT AIRPORT ATC 10% WEATHER, 32.2% CAPACITY, 5.4% 0% -10% AIRPORT -20.3% -22.2% -25.5% INFRASTRUCTU -20% EN-ROUTE ATC -38.4% RE, 8.9% -30% -43.8% CAPACITY, -40%-27.0% -30.8% 22.9% -50% -40.0% -46.0% EN-ROUTE -47.1% -60% -50.9% -48.0% EVENTS, 1.2% -70% -57.6% EN-ROUTE ATC -80% EN-ROUTE STAFFING, 18.8% -74.3% WEATHER & EXTERNAL EN-ROUTE ATC JUL JAN FEB SEP OCT APR JUN OCT NOV DEC MAR MAY AUG DISRUPTIONS, DISRUPTIONS, Comparison to same month last year Rolling 12 month trend 2.0% 8.7% ATFM delays continue to decline slightly. The 12 month trend has In October, 53.6% of all ATFM delay was en-route while the been -48% to -58% since May 2012. remaining 46.4% occurred at the Airports/TMA. En-route ATC capacity, staffing and disruptions accounted for 50.4% of all ATFM delays. French industrial action on 22-24 October accounted for 7.4 % of all ATFM delays in October. s Top 20 delay locations for ATFM delays in October 2012 AIRPORT ATC CAPACITY 14 % AIRPORT WEATHER 3491 12 % AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE EN-ROUTE WEATHER & EXTERNAL DISRUPTIONS 2846 10 % EN-ROUTE EVENTS EN-ROUTE ATC DISRUPTIONS 8% 2176 1834 EN-ROUTE ATC STAFFING 6% EN-ROUTE ATC CAPACITY 1086 10 18 9 9 1 933 4% 842 789 759 740 696 636 626 624 610 571 546 545 2% 0% Proportion of total ATFM delay ATFM total of Proportion ZURICH LANGEN ACC NICOSIA ACC MUENCHEN 2 MUENCHEN PARIS ACC ALL MARSEILLE ACC WARSZAWA ACC WARSZAWA LISBOA ACC/UAC MADRID ACC ALL BARCELONA ACC MADRID BARAJAS MADRID FRANKFURT MAIN WIEN SCHWECHAT CANARIAS ACC/FIC CANARIAS BORDEAUX ACC ALL ISTANBUL-ATATURK OSLO/GARDERMOEN LONDON/HEATHROW PARIS CH PARIS DE GAULLE SCHIPHOL_AMSTERDAM These are the top 20 delay generating locations for the reporting month. Figures are the average daily delays in minutes. • Langen ACC recorded the highest delays in October due to significant staffing issues and ATC capacity. • London Heathrow, Oslo, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Munich, Vienna, Paris CDG and Madrid airports recorded delays due to weather mainly fog, low visibility, rain, wind and snow. • Lisbon ACC was strongly affected by staffing issues plus some reduction in capacity due to new software implementation. • French ACCs recorded significant delays due to the French Industrial action on 22-24 October. • Marseille, Barcelona, Canarias, Nicosia, Warsaw and Madrid ACCs registered significant ATC capacity delays. • The limited use of the optimum runway configurations at Zurich airport (due to environmental constraints) and at Istanbul Ataturk airport (due southerly winds) continued to cause significant delays. DNM Network Operations Report – Analysis - October 2012 4 3. EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAYS 3.1. EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY PER LOCATION s Top 20 delay locations for en-route delays in October 2012 12 % 3491 EN-ROUTE WEA THER & EXTERNAL DISRUPTIONS EN-ROUTE EV ENTS 10 % EN-ROUTE ATC DISRUPTIONS EN-ROUTE ATC STAFFING 8% 2176 EN-ROUTE ATC CAPACITY 1834 6% 10 18 9 9 1 4% 789 759 626 624 610 543 509 480 2% 309 246 243 18 8 14 2 12 6 12 5 0% Proportion of total ATFM delay total of Proportion WIEN ACC SEVILLA ACCSEVILLA ZURICH ACC ZURICH LANGEN ACC NICOSIA ACC ANKARA ACC REIMS U/ACC BREST U/ACC BREMEN ACC PARIS ACC ALL MUNCHEN ACC MUNCHEN MARSEILLE ACC WARSZAWA ACC WARSZAWA LISBOA ACC/UAC MADRID ALL ACC ALL MADRID BARCELONA ACC UAC KARLSRUHE CANARIAS ACC/FIC BORDEAUX ACC ALL AMSTERDAM ACC(245-) The top 20 en-route delay locations generated 52% of the monthly total (network) ATFM delay. The top 5 en-route delay locations generated 31% of the monthly total (network) ATFM delay. DNM Network Operations Report – Analysis - October 2012 5 3.2. EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY PER DELAY GROUP Reasons for en-route delays in October 2012 En-route delays accounted for 53.6% of all ATFM delays. 22.9% EN-ROUTE EVENTS 1. 2 % were attributed to en-route ATC capacity, 18.8% to en-route ATC EN-ROUTE WEATHER & EXTERNAL staffing, 8.7% to en-route ATC disruptions, 2% to en-route 2.0%
Recommended publications
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf

    Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf

    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable

    My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable

    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
  • Public Awareness About Prices and Rivalry in Air Transport Markets: a Case Study in the Canary Islands

    Public Awareness About Prices and Rivalry in Air Transport Markets: a Case Study in the Canary Islands

    Public awareness about prices and rivalry in air transport markets: a case study in the Canary Islands Javier CAMPOS Juan Luis JIMÉNEZ** Jordi PERDIGUERO*** Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ULPGC) (UAB) February 15, 2014 Abstract This paper studies – both from a theoretical and empirical perspective – an interesting case of monopoly power in the Canary Islands’ domestic air transport market. Contrary to received economic theory, we show how after the exit of its rival in an initially duopolistic market, the remaining airline did not increase its prices; furthermore, after the entry of a new competitor, tariffs were not reduced. According to our analysis, these counterintuitive results can be explained by the public awareness that was created about the incumbent’s behaviour and its attempt of presenting itself as a benevolent monopolist affected by fake competition. We prove our ideas by developing a theoretical multi-route oligopolistic model with differentiated services and by testing its implications using several difference-in-difference econometric techniques on a monthly prices database collected in 2012-2013. Keywords: air transport, Canary Islands, entry and exit, difference in difference. JEL CODES: L41, L93, C50 Corresponding author. Departamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado. [email protected]. Mr Campos acknowledges support from the EVA-AIR project, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness, research grant ECO 2012-39277. Phone: +34 928451792. Fax: +34 928458183. ** Departamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado. [email protected]. *** Departament d’Economia Aplicada. Research Group of “Governs i Mercats” (GiM), and Institut de Recerca en Economia Aplicada (IREA).
  • Els Acords Bilaterals I La Seva Influència En La Creació D’Enllaços Aeris Més Enllà De La UE El Cas De L’Aeroport De Barcelona

    Els Acords Bilaterals I La Seva Influència En La Creació D’Enllaços Aeris Més Enllà De La UE El Cas De L’Aeroport De Barcelona

    cubierta acords catalan 25/3/09 14:34 Pgina 1 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Composicin 00 Acords Catalan.qxp:Cat 25/3/09 17:28 Página 1 els acords bilaterals i la seva influència en la creació d’enllaços aeris més enllà de la UE el cas de l’aeroport de barcelona gener de 2009 00 Acords Catalan.qxp:Cat 25/3/09 17:28 Página 2 Els acords bilaterals i la seva influència en la creació d’enllaços aeris més enllà de la UE. El cas de l’aeroport de Barcelona Realitzat amb la col·laboració de la Direcció General d’Aviació Civil del ministeri de Foment Barcelona, gener de 2009 Preu: 18 ! (IVA inclòs) © Cambra Oficial de Comerç, Indústria i Navegació de Barcelona Supervisió general: Salvador Curcoll Cambra de Comerç de Barcelona Direcció de l’informe: Òscar Oliver Gestió i Promoció Aeroportuària, SA (GPA) Elaboració de l’informe: Xavier Requejo (GPA) Albert Contra (GPA) Direcció editorial: Cambra de Comerç de Barcelona Disseny gràfic: Toni Fresno Cambra de Comerç de Barcelona Autoedició i fotocomposició: Anglofort, SA Impressió i producció: Ingoprint, SA ISBN: 84-95829-54-1 Depòsit legal: B-16.131-2009 00 Acords Catalan.qxp:Cat 25/3/09 17:28 Página 3 estudi llotja INFRAESTRUCTURES I TERRITORI Índex Presentació ................................................... 5 Resum executiu ............................................... 7 Glossari ..................................................... 11 1. Introducció. El perquè d’aquest informe .......................... 15 2. La regulació del trànsit aeri mundial: els acords bilaterals entre estats sobirans ................................................... 17 2.1 Les llibertats de l’aire . 19 3. La Unió Europea i el trànsit aeri internacional ....................
  • Elenco Codici IATA Delle Compagnie Aeree

    Elenco Codici IATA Delle Compagnie Aeree

    Elenco codici IATA delle compagnie aeree. OGNI COMPAGNIA AEREA HA UN CODICE IATA Un elenco dei codici ATA delle compagnie aeree è uno strumento fondamentale, per chi lavora in agenzia viaggi e nel settore del turismo in generale. Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree, costituito da due lettere, indica un determinato vettore aereo. Ad esempio, è utilizzato nelle prime due lettere del codice di un volo: – AZ 502, AZ indica la compagnia aerea Alitalia. – FR 4844, FR indica la compagnia aerea Ryanair -AF 567, AF, indica la compagnia aerea Air France Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree è utilizzato per scopi commerciali, nell’ambito di una prenotazione, orari (ad esempio nel tabellone partenza e arrivi in aeroporto) , biglietti , tariffe , lettere di trasporto aereo e bagagli Di seguito, per una visione di insieme, una lista in ordine alfabetico dei codici di molte compagnie aeree di tutto il mondo. Per una ricerca più rapida e precisa, potete cliccare il tasto Ctrl ed f contemporaneamente. Se non doveste trovare un codice IATA di una compagnia aerea in questa lista, ecco la pagina del sito dell’organizzazione Di seguito le sigle iata degli aeroporti di tutto il mondo ELENCO CODICI IATA COMPAGNIE AEREE: 0A – Amber Air (Lituania) 0B – Blue Air (Romania) 0J – Jetclub (Svizzera) 1A – Amadeus Global Travel Distribution (Spagna) 1B – Abacus International (Singapore) 1C – Electronic Data Systems (Svizzera) 1D – Radixx Solutions International (USA) 1E – Travelsky Technology (Cina) 1F – INFINI Travel Information (Giappone) G – Galileo International
  • Prior Compliance List of Aircraft Operators Specifying the Administering Member State for Each Aircraft Operator – June 2014

    Prior Compliance List of Aircraft Operators Specifying the Administering Member State for Each Aircraft Operator – June 2014

    Prior compliance list of aircraft operators specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator – June 2014 Inclusion in the prior compliance list allows aircraft operators to know which Member State will most likely be attributed to them as their administering Member State so they can get in contact with the competent authority of that Member State to discuss the requirements and the next steps. Due to a number of reasons, and especially because a number of aircraft operators use services of management companies, some of those operators have not been identified in the latest update of the EEA- wide list of aircraft operators adopted on 5 February 2014. The present version of the prior compliance list includes those aircraft operators, which have submitted their fleet lists between December 2013 and January 2014. BELGIUM CRCO Identification no. Operator Name State of the Operator 31102 ACT AIRLINES TURKEY 7649 AIRBORNE EXPRESS UNITED STATES 33612 ALLIED AIR LIMITED NIGERIA 29424 ASTRAL AVIATION LTD KENYA 31416 AVIA TRAFFIC COMPANY TAJIKISTAN 30020 AVIASTAR-TU CO. RUSSIAN FEDERATION 40259 BRAVO CARGO UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 908 BRUSSELS AIRLINES BELGIUM 25996 CAIRO AVIATION EGYPT 4369 CAL CARGO AIRLINES ISRAEL 29517 CAPITAL AVTN SRVCS NETHERLANDS 39758 CHALLENGER AERO PHILIPPINES f11336 CORPORATE WINGS LLC UNITED STATES 32909 CRESAIR INC UNITED STATES 32432 EGYPTAIR CARGO EGYPT f12977 EXCELLENT INVESTMENT UNITED STATES LLC 32486 FAYARD ENTERPRISES UNITED STATES f11102 FedEx Express Corporate UNITED STATES Aviation 13457 Flying
  • Industry Monitor the EUROCONTROL Bulletin on Air Transport Trends

    Industry Monitor the EUROCONTROL Bulletin on Air Transport Trends

    Issue N°145. 31/10/12 Industry Monitor The EUROCONTROL bulletin on air transport trends European traffic down 3% in September. EUROCONTROL statistics and forecasts 1 Air France-KLM and Lufthansa posted higher Passenger airlines 2 3Q12 operating profit compared with the same period last year. Financial results of airlines 6 Qatar Airways is to join oneworld and is the first Environment 7 Gulf carrier to become a member of a global Aircraft Manufacturing 7 airline alliance. Airports 8 Oil prices reduced slightly to €86 per barrel in Regulation 8 October. International Energy Agency predicts Oil 9 oils prices to fall to €69 by 2017 due to global production capacity increasing and economic Fares 9 slowdown keeping demand growth sluggish. EUROCONTROL statistics and forecasts European flights decreased by 3% in September year-on-year, on the low side of the forecast range (see Figure 1). Low-cost and Charter were the only segments to show flight growth compared with September last year, with 3.2% and 2.5% respectively. Cargo decreased by 9.2%, business aviation by 6.2% and Traditional Scheduled by 5% versus 2011 levels (EUROCONTROL, October). Based on preliminary data from airlines for delay from all causes, 36% of flights were delayed on departure in September, a 3 percentage point decrease on September 2011. Analysis of the causes of delay shows a decrease of 0.8 minute per flight from reactionary delay and ATFCM en-route delays fell by 0.7 minutes to 0.4 minutes per flight. (see Figure 2) (EUROCONTROL, October). On 29 October, Hurricane Sandy is estimated to have cut 40% of west-bound and 9% of east- bound Atlantic flights compared with the same weekday in 2011 (EUROCONTROL, 31 October).
  • Die Folgende Liste Zeigt Alle Fluggesellschaften, Die Über Den Flugvergleich Von Verivox Buchbar Sein Können

    Die Folgende Liste Zeigt Alle Fluggesellschaften, Die Über Den Flugvergleich Von Verivox Buchbar Sein Können

    Die folgende Liste zeigt alle Fluggesellschaften, die über den Flugvergleich von Verivox buchbar sein können. Aufgrund von laufenden Updates einzelner Tarife, technischen Problemen oder eingeschränkten Verfügbarkeiten kann es vorkommen, dass einzelne Airlines oder Tarife nicht berechnet oder angezeigt werden können. 1 Adria Airways 2 Aegean Airlines 3 Aer Arann 4 Aer Lingus 5 Aeroflot 6 Aerolan 7 Aerolíneas Argentinas 8 Aeroméxico 9 Air Algérie 10 Air Astana 11 Air Austral 12 Air Baltic 13 Air Berlin 14 Air Botswana 15 Air Canada 16 Air Caraibes 17 Air China 18 Air Corsica 19 Air Dolomiti 20 Air Europa 21 Air France 22 Air Guinee Express 23 Air India 24 Air Jamaica 25 Air Madagascar 26 Air Malta 27 Air Mauritius 28 Air Moldova 29 Air Namibia 30 Air New Zealand 31 Air One 32 Air Serbia 33 Air Transat 34 Air Asia 35 Alaska Airlines 36 Alitalia 37 All Nippon Airways 38 American Airlines 39 Arkefly 40 Arkia Israel Airlines 41 Asiana Airlines 42 Atlasglobal 43 Austrian Airlines 44 Avianca 45 B&H Airlines 46 Bahamasair 47 Bangkok Airways 48 Belair Airlines 49 Belavia Belarusian Airlines 50 Binter Canarias 51 Blue1 52 British Airways 53 British Midland International 54 Brussels Airlines 55 Bulgaria Air 56 Caribbean Airlines 57 Carpatair 58 Cathay Pacific 59 China Airlines 60 China Eastern 61 China Southern Airlines 62 Cimber Sterling 63 Condor 64 Continental Airlines 65 Corsair International 66 Croatia Airlines 67 Cubana de Aviacion 68 Cyprus Airways 69 Czech Airlines 70 Darwin Airline 71 Delta Airlines 72 Dragonair 73 EasyJet 74 EgyptAir 75
  • Efectos De La Obligación De Servicio Público Y Del Programa Essential Air Service Sobre Los Costes De Las Compañías Aéreas Regionales

    Efectos De La Obligación De Servicio Público Y Del Programa Essential Air Service Sobre Los Costes De Las Compañías Aéreas Regionales

    ARTÍCULOSARTÍCULOSARTÍCULOSARTÍCULOSARTÍCULOSARTÍCUL EFECTOS DE LA OBLIGACIÓN DE SERVICIO PÚBLICO Y DEL PROGRAMA ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE SOBRE LOS COSTES DE LAS COMPAÑÍAS AÉREAS REGIONALES Isabel Santana Martín Este trabajo lleva a cabo un análisis de costes para una muestra de com- pañías aéreas regionales europeas y norteamericanas. El objetivo que se persigue es doble ya que, por una parte, trata de desarrollar una función de costes totales para dichas compañías y, por otra, analiza si el hecho de que alguna de estas compañías opere sus servicios bajo la Obligación de Servicio Público (OSP) o bajo el programa Essential Air Service (EAS), está afectando su comportamiento en términos de costes. La función de costes se construirá a partir de un panel de datos para los años 1991-2002, siendo la aportación de este trabajo la inclusión en el mo- delo de las variables dicotómicas OSP y EAS, las cuales permitirán con- trastar la hipótesis nula de partida de que aquellas variables operando bajo OSP o EAS tedrán mayores costes. Los resultados obtenidos permi- tirán aceptar la hipótesis de partida para el caso de la OSP al analizar la muestra completa. Sin embargo, para las compañías americanas que ope- ran bajo el EAS, no hay evidencia empírica que permita afirmar que sus costes difieren respecto al resto de compañías analizadas en este trabajo. This paper carries out an analysis of costs for a set of regional air carriers. The objective of this work is double: firstly it aims to develop a general model for re- gional air transport with an international scope by using a panel data set on Eu- ropean and North American regional airlines; secondly, it means to examine the extent to which the operation under Public Service Obligations (PSO) or under the Essential Air Service Program (EAS) is affecting the costs of these airlines.
  • An Empirical Evaluation of Changes in Public Service Obligations in Spain

    An Empirical Evaluation of Changes in Public Service Obligations in Spain

    AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF CHANGES IN PUBLIC SERVICE OBLIGATIONS IN SPAIN José Abreua, Xavier Fagedab, Juan Luis Jiménezc a Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain b Universidad de Barcelona, Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Av. Diagonal 690, 08034 Barcelona, Spain c Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Facultad de Economía, Empresa y Turismo, Despacho D. 2-12, 35017, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain Abstract Public Service Obligations are a key mechanism for countries to improve connections among islands and remote regions with the Continent. While Public Service Obligations are allowed by the European Commission, they represent an interference with free market competition, and impact on the entrance of competitors, prices and service frequency. This study employs Canarian air market data for 2002-2015 to econometrically evaluate the effects of two changes in European policy on the number of passengers transported. The results point to the need to make market access more flexible to benefit society by generating increases in the volume of passengers moved. Key words: Public Service Obligations; Air Transport; Spain. JEL Code: L93, H25, L13 1 1. Introduction Since the process of liberalization of the European air market initiated in 19871, a series of public interventions have aimed to enable mobility among diverse European regions. This interference in the free market has fundamentally occured through two non-exclusive mechanisms: Public Service Obligations (hereafter PSO) and traveller discounts, predominantly to residents in these regions.2 Regarding the former, the imposition of a PSO on an air route involves the regulation of market access, service levels (frequencies, seats, time schedules, type of aircraft) and prices.
  • El Sector Del Transporte Aéreo Y El Sistema Aeroportuario En Las Islas Canarias: Fundamentos Teóricos Y Análisis De Su Estructura Económica Y Financiera

    El Sector Del Transporte Aéreo Y El Sistema Aeroportuario En Las Islas Canarias: Fundamentos Teóricos Y Análisis De Su Estructura Económica Y Financiera

    EL SECTOR DEL TRANSPORTE AÉREO Y EL SISTEMA AEROPORTUARIO EN LAS ISLAS CANARIAS: FUNDAMENTOS TEÓRICOS Y ANÁLISIS DE SU ESTRUCTURA ECONÓMICA Y FINANCIERA. Canary Islands’ air transport sector and airport system: foundations and analysis of its economic and financial structure. Del Castillo Santos, María Jesús González Barreto, Laura del Sol González Sosa, Geisbel Grado en Contabilidad y Finanzas, curso 2015/2016 Convocatoria: Julio Fecha: 06/07/2016 Tutora: Judit Mendoza Aguilar Resumen En este trabajo analizamos el sector aeroportuario y, en concreto, el transporte aéreo en las Islas Canarias, haciendo un estudio más detenido de las compañías aéreas que operan en el archipiélago. En primer lugar, examinamos las características de este sector en España, seguido de las particularidades fiscales de Canarias aplicables a este tipo de empresas, por último, estudiaremos los modelos de gestión y sistemas de explotación empleadas por las aerolíneas establecidas en el mercado. La metodología utilizada consiste en la síntesis de material bibliográfico y en el análisis de la información extraída de diferentes bases de datos. Con ello, pretendemos realizar un análisis económico-financiero de las principales compañías, tratando así, de detectar los puntos claves para el establecimiento de empresas en este ámbito. Palabras clave: AENA, aerolínea, Islas Canarias, transporte aéreo. Abstract In this work we analyze the airport sector and, in particular, air transport within the Canary Islands, making a detailed study of the airlines that operate in the archipelago. In the first place, we examine the development of this sector, then, we analyze the Canary Islands fiscal particularities applicable to this type of company and finally, we study the management models and systems of exploitation used by the airlines established in the field.
  • Servei a Bord En Companyies Aèries Regulars Espanyoles”

    Servei a Bord En Companyies Aèries Regulars Espanyoles”

    UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA ESCOLA POLITÈ CNICA SUPERIOR DE GANDIA Diplomatura en Turisme “SERVEI A BORD EN COMPANYIES AÈRIES REGULARS ESPANYOLES” TREBALL FINAL DE CARRERA Autor/es: Anabel Vidal Martí Director/a/s: En Bernat Roig Merino Na María Anton Gonzalez GANDIA, 2011 _________________________________________________________AGRAÏMENTS AGRAÏMENTS El meu TFC està dedicat a totes aquelles persones que comparteixen la meva professió de Tripulant de Cabina de Passatgers. Persones que repassen cada dia procediments de seguretat i d'emergències a bord en relació amb els vols que hagin de realitzar. Persones encarregades de revisar el material d'emergència d'un avió, així com les condicions de les portes i rampes perquè res falli en una possible emergència a bord o en una evacuació de passatgers. Persones encarregades de revisar el càtering perquè res falti a l'hora del servei. Persones encarregades d'acomodar al passatge i tancar portes en l'hora programada per no perdre el “slot” i no acumular retards per al vol següent. Persones encarregades de fer el recompte de passatgers per a que coincideixi amb el full de càrrega de l'avió. Persones encarregades de mostrar instruccions de seguretat en cada vol i recitar: "senyors passatgers, a continuació i seguint normes internacionals d'aviació civil, anem a fer una demostració de seguretat..." Persones encarregades de tancar portes i assegurar-se armar rampes. Persones encarregades de revisar la cabina i galleys abans de l'enlairament i l'aterratge. Persones encarregades d'atendre els pilots cada 15 o 20 minuts. Persones preparades per a possibles emergències a bord i capaços d'evacuar a tot un avió en 90 segons.