Display PDF in Separate
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Black Country Urban Park Barometer
3333333 Black Country Urban Park Barometer April 2013 DRAFT WORK IN PROGRESS Welcome to the Black Country Urban Park Barometer. Transformation of the Environmental Infrastructure is one of the key to drivers identified in the Black Country Strategy for Growth and Competitiveness. The full report looks at the six themes created under the ‘Urban Park’ theme and provides a spatial picture of that theme accompanied with the key assets and opportunities for that theme. Foreword to be provided by Roger Lawrence The Strategic Context Quality of the Black Country environment is one of the four primary objectives of the Black Country Vision that has driven the preparation of the Black Country Strategy for Growth and Competitiveness through the Black Country Study process. The environment is critical to the health and well-being of future residents, workers and visitors to the Black Country. It is also both a major contributor to, and measure of, wider goals for sustainable development and living as well as being significantly important to the economy of the region. The importance and the desire for transforming the Black Country environment has been reinforced through the evidence gathering and analysis of the Black Country Study process as both an aspiration in its own right and as a necessity to achieve economic prosperity. Evidence from the Economic and Housing Studies concluded that ‘the creation of new environments will be crucial for attracting investment from high value-added firms’ and similarly that ‘a high quality healthy environment is a priority for ‘knowledge workers’. The Economic Strategy puts ‘Environmental Transformation’ alongside Education & Skills as the fundamental driver to achieve Black Country economic renaissance and prosperity for its people. -
PDF995, Job 6
The Wildlife Trust for Birmingham and the Black Country _____________________________________________________________ The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background December 2005 Protecting Wildlife for the Future The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 The Wildlife Trust for Birmingham and the Black Country gratefully acknowledges support from English Nature, Dudley MBC, Sandwell MBC, Walsall MBC and Wolverhampton City Council. This Report was compiled by: Dr Ellen Pisolkar MSc IEEM The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 3. SITES 4 3.1 Introduction 4 3.2 Birmingham 3.2.1 Edgbaston Reservoir 5 3.2.2 Moseley Bog 11 3.2.3 Queslett Quarry 17 3.2.4 Spaghetti Junction 22 3.2.5 Swanshurst Park 26 3.3 Dudley 3.3.1 Castle Hill 30 3.3.2 Doulton’s Claypit/Saltwells Wood 34 3.3.3 Fens Pools 44 3.4 Sandwell 3.4.1 Darby’s Hill Rd and Darby’s Hill Quarry 50 3.4.2 Sandwell Valley 54 3.4.3 Sheepwash Urban Park 63 3.5 Walsall 3.5.1 Moorcroft Wood 71 3.5.2 Reedswood Park 76 3.5 3 Rough Wood 81 3.6 Wolverhampton 3.6.1 Northycote Farm 85 3.6.2 Smestow Valley LNR (Valley Park) 90 3.6.3 West Park 97 4. HABITATS 101 The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 4.1 Introduction 101 4.2 Heathland 103 4.3 Canals 105 4.4 Rivers and Streams 110 4.5 Waterbodies 115 4.6 Grassland 119 4.7 Woodland 123 5. -
Burton Upon Trent Tales of the Town Ebook
BURTON UPON TRENT TALES OF THE TOWN PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Geoffrey Sowerby | 128 pages | 30 Apr 1998 | The History Press Ltd | 9780752410975 | English | Stroud, United Kingdom Burton Upon Trent Tales of the Town PDF Book The property also benefits from uPVC double glazing. Condition: Good. The 4-a. The wall up the stairs is adorned with pictures of most recent mayors with the current one at the end of the ascending line. On the whole, the town hall had a very classical touch to it, complete with an east end traditional fire-place and a fitted chimney, above which hung the portrait of the first Marquess of Anglesey — Lord Henry Paget. See all our books here, order more than 1 book and get discounted shipping. United Kingdom. Condition: NEW. Newton Fallowell are pleased to be able to offer to the rental market this superb room in this well presented house share in Stapenhill. Administered by The National Trust. Come and see the Staffordshire Regiment Museum tell the story of the bravery, tenacity…. Lichfield Cathedral is a medieval Cathedral with 3 spires set in its own Close and is…. A visit to Tamworth Castle takes you back in time and offers a perfect blend of…. By a strip of land along the riverbank near the present municipal cemetery had been laid out by Edward Cliff, a beerhouse keeper, as a public pleasure ground. Are Beer Festivals a thing of the past, well at least for the foreseeable future? Leave a Reply Cancel reply You must be logged in to post a comment. -
Land at Bratch Common Road, Wombourne December 2019 Our
South Staffordshire Council Local Plan Review Spatial Housing Strategy & Infrastructure Delivery October 2019 Representations on behalf of St Philips – Land at Bratch Common Road, Wombourne December 2019 Our Ref: A112233 Introduction These representations are submitted by WYG on behalf of St Philips Homes in respect of their land interests at Bratch Common Road, Wombourne, identified on the Plan at Appendix 1. St Philips has submitted representations to the Issues and Options stage of the South Staffordshire Local Plan Review (Appendix 2) and a copy of a Vision Document showing how the site at Bratch Common Road could be developed is enclosed for information (Appendix 3). The representations are structured to respond to the questions set out on the online consultation response form. They also make specific reference to the tests of soundness for plan-making set out at para 35 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). Specifically, these representations seek to test the proposed Spatial Housing Options in terms of whether they are: “a) Positively prepared – providing a strategy which, as a minimum, seeks to meet the area’s objectively assessed needs; and is informed by agreements with other authorities, so that unmet need from neighbouring areas is accommodated where it is practical to do so and is consistent with achieving sustainable development; b) Justified – an appropriate strategy, taking into account the reasonable alternatives, and based on proportionate evidence; c) Effective – deliverable over the plan period, and based -
Staffordshire 30Undar Es W Th Cheshire Derbyshire Wa Rw Ckshiir and Refg Rid an D Worcester Local
No. 5H2 Review of Non-Metropolitan Counties. COUNTY OF STAFFORDSHIRE 30UNDAR ES W TH CHESHIRE DERBYSHIRE WA RW CKSHIIR AND REFG RID AN D WORCESTER LOCAL BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOH ENGLAND RETORT NO •5112 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell CBE FRICS FSVA Members Mr K F J Ennals CB Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany PATTEN.PPD THE RT. HON. CHRIS PATTEN HP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES COUNTY OF STAFFORDSHIRE: BOUNDARIES WITH CHESHIRE, DERBYSHIRE,. WARWICKSHIRE, AND HEREFORD AND WORCESTER COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1. On 26 July 1985 we wrote to Staffordshire County Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of the County under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of our letter were sent to all the principal local authorities and parishes in Staffordshire, and in the adjoining counties of Cheshire, Derbyshire, West Midlands, Shropshire, Warwickshire, Hereford and Worcester and Leicestershire; to the National and County Associations of Local Councils; to the Members of Parliament with constituency interests and to the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition copies were sent to those government departments with an interest; regional health authorities; public utilities in the area; the English Tourist Board; the editors of the Municipal Journal and Local Government Chronicle; and to local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The County Councils were requested to co-operate as necessary with each other, and with the District Councils concerned, to assist us in publicising the start of the review, by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers so as to give a wide coverage in the areas concerned. -
Inspection Report Wood Lane Primary School Bignall End
INSPECTION REPORT WOOD LANE PRIMARY SCHOOL BIGNALL END, STOKE ON TRENT LEA area: Staffordshire Unique reference number: 124057 Headteacher: Mrs Pauline Francis Reporting inspector: Mrs Pat King - 7853 Dates of inspection: 19 June-22 June, 2000 Inspection number: 8602158 Inspection carried out under section 10 of the School Inspections Act 1996 © Crown copyright 2000 This report may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that all extracts quoted are reproduced verbatim without adaptation and on condition that the source and date thereof are stated. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the School Inspections Act 1996, the school must provide a copy of this report and/or its summary free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL Type of school: Infant and Junior School School category: Community Age range of pupils: 4-11 years Gender of pupils: Mixed School address: Wood Lane, Bignall End, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire. Postcode: ST7 8PH Telephone number: 01782 720487 Fax number: 01782 720487 Appropriate authority: The Governing Body Name of chair of governors: Mr Maurice Howell Date of previous inspection: 27-31 January, 1997 Wood Lane - 3 INFORMATION ABOUT THE INSPECTION TEAM Subject responsibilities Aspect responsibilities Team members Mrs Pat King Registered Art; The School’s Results and inspector English; Pupils’ Achievements; Physical Education. How Well Are Pupils Taught? How Well Is The School Led and Managed? Mrs Elizabeth Fraser Lay inspector Accommodation; Community Links; How Well Does The School Care For Its Pupils? The School’s Partnership With Parents. -
Malvern Hills District & Wychavon District Councils Safeguarding Policy
Malvern Hills District & Wychavon District Councils Safeguarding Policy Procedures, Protocols and Practice VERSION CONTROL Version Control Organisation Malvern Hills District and Wychavon District Councils Title Joint Safeguarding Policy Author Amanda Smith Filename Safeguarding Policy – 2018, Annex’s A - I Owner SMT Subject Safeguarding Children and Adults, Legislation, Policies and Procedures Classification NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Document All Staff Distribution Review date Annual review: next review May 2019 Document location MHDC: Website: https://www.malvernhills.gov.uk/safeguarding- policy Intranet: http://www.malvernhills.gov.uk/web/mhdc- intranet/safeguarding WDC: Website: https://www.wychavon.gov.uk/safeguarding Internet: https://www.malvernhills.gov.uk/safeguarding- policy Equalities Impact Equalities screening form shows no detailed Equalities Assessment Impact Approval (by whom SMT – June 2018 and date): Version History Revision Reviser Version Description of Revision Date 11.05.18 Amanda Smith 1.0 Amalgamation of existing council separate policies into a single joint policy.. 2 | Page CONTENTS Section Description Page(s) 1 Foreword 4 2 Executive Summary 5 3 Policy Statement 6 4 Effective Information Sharing 7 5 Scope Of Policy 8 – 9 6 Approach To Implementing The Policy 10 - 12 7 Working Together: Key Partnerships and Organisations 13 – 14 8 Supporting Documents 15 9 Policy Enquiries 16 1. FOREWORD At a time when the safeguarding of children and adults with care and support needs has never been a greater concern, Malvern Hills District Council and Wychavon District Council felt it was important to review their Safeguarding Policy to ensure its arrangements adequately reflect the additional responsibilities currently being placed on it, and that these additional requirements are being fully considered in the approach being taken to protect people from abuse. -
West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme
Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective 2007 – 2013 West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme Version 3 July 2012 CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 – 5 2a SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS - ORIGINAL 2.1 Summary of Eligible Area - Strengths and Challenges 6 – 14 2.2 Employment 15 – 19 2.3 Competition 20 – 27 2.4 Enterprise 28 – 32 2.5 Innovation 33 – 37 2.6 Investment 38 – 42 2.7 Skills 43 – 47 2.8 Environment and Attractiveness 48 – 50 2.9 Rural 51 – 54 2.10 Urban 55 – 58 2.11 Lessons Learnt 59 – 64 2.12 SWOT Analysis 65 – 70 2b SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS – UPDATED 2010 2.1 Summary of Eligible Area - Strengths and Challenges 71 – 83 2.2 Employment 83 – 87 2.3 Competition 88 – 95 2.4 Enterprise 96 – 100 2.5 Innovation 101 – 105 2.6 Investment 106 – 111 2.7 Skills 112 – 119 2.8 Environment and Attractiveness 120 – 122 2.9 Rural 123 – 126 2.10 Urban 127 – 130 2.11 Lessons Learnt 131 – 136 2.12 SWOT Analysis 137 - 142 3 STRATEGY 3.1 Challenges 143 - 145 3.2 Policy Context 145 - 149 3.3 Priorities for Action 150 - 164 3.4 Process for Chosen Strategy 165 3.5 Alignment with the Main Strategies of the West 165 - 166 Midlands 3.6 Development of the West Midlands Economic 166 Strategy 3.7 Strategic Environmental Assessment 166 - 167 3.8 Lisbon Earmarking 167 3.9 Lisbon Agenda and the Lisbon National Reform 167 Programme 3.10 Partnership Involvement 167 3.11 Additionality 167 - 168 4 PRIORITY AXES Priority 1 – Promoting Innovation and Research and Development 4.1 Rationale and Objective 169 - 170 4.2 Description of Activities -
Choice Plus:Layout 1 5/1/10 10:26 Page 3 Home HOME Choice CHOICE .ORG.UK Plus PLUS
home choice plus:Layout 1 5/1/10 10:26 Page 3 Home HOME Choice CHOICE .ORG.UK Plus PLUS ‘Working in partnership to offer choice from a range of housing options for people in housing need’ home choice plus:Layout 1 5/1/10 10:26 Page 4 The Home Choice Plus process The Home Choice Plus process 2 What is a ‘bid’? 8 Registering with Home Choice plus 3 How do I bid? 9 How does the banding system work? 4 How will I know if I am successful? 10 How do I find available properties? 7 Contacts 11 What is Home Choice Plus? Home Choice Plus has been designed to improve access to affordable housing. The advantage is that you only register once and the scheme allows you to view and bid on available properties for which you are eligible across all of the districts. Home Choice Plus has been developed by a number of Local Authorities and Housing Associations working in partnership. Home Choice Plus is a way of allocating housing and advertising other housing options across the participating Local Authority areas. (Home Choice Plus will also be used for advertising other housing options such as private rents and intermediate rents). This booklet explains how to look for housing across all of the Districts involved in this scheme. Please see website for further information. Who is eligible to join the Home Choice Plus register? • Some people travelling to the United Kingdom are not entitled to Housing Association accommodation on the basis of their immigration status. • You may be excluded if you have a history of serious rent arrears or anti social behaviour. -
Wyre Forest District Local Development Framework Site Allocations DPD - Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report (April 2008) Page 2
Wyre Forest District Local Development Framework Site Allocations Development Plan Document Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report April 2008 Forward Planning Section Planning, Health & Environment Division Wyre Forest District Council Duke House Clensmore Street Kidderminster Worcestershire DY10 2JX CONTENTS PAGE 1. Introduction Page 1 2. Background Page 1 3. The SA Process Page 2 4. Purpose of the SA Scoping Report Page 2 5. SEA Directive Requirements Page 4 6. Identifying Relevant Plans, Polices, Programmes and Sustainability Objectives Page 5 7. Baseline Data Collection Page 7 8. Identification of Main Sustainability Issues Page 9 9. Developing the SA Framework Page 12 10. Emerging Site Allocations Objectives Page 16 11. Testing the Compatibility of the SA Objectives Page 18 12. Consultation on the SA Scoping Report Page 20 13. Next Steps Page 22 Appendix A: Identification of other Relevant Plans, Policies, Programmes and Sustainability Objectives Appendix B: Baseline Data SEA Directive requirements and Where they are met: SEA Directive Requirement Where it is Met (a) an outline of the contents, main objectives of the plan or programme and Section 6 and relationship with other relevant plans and programmes; Appendix A (b) the relevant aspects of the current state of the environment and the likely Section 7 and evolution thereof without implementation of the plan or programme; Appendix B (c) the environmental characteristics of areas likely to be significantly affected; Section 7 and Appendix B (d) any existing environmental problems -
Report to South Staffordshire Council
Report to South Staffordshire Council by Stephen J Pratt BA (Hons) MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State 08 May 2018 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended) Section 20 Report on the Examination of the South Staffordshire Local Plan Site Allocations Document The Plan was submitted for examination on 15 September 2017 The examination hearings took place between 28 November – 8 December 2017 File Ref: PINS/C3430/429/4 Abbreviations used in this report AM Additional Modification AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty BCLEP Black Country Local Enterprise Partnership DEFRA Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs DPD Development Plan Document DfT Department for Transport DtC Duty to Co-operate dw/yr dwellings per year EA Environment Agency EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ELS Employment Land Study GBHMA Greater Birmingham Housing Market Area GBR Green Belt Review GBSLEP Greater Birmingham & Solihull LEP GTAA Gypsy & Traveller Accommodation Assessment HA Highway Authority ha hectares HMA Housing Market Area HRA Habitats Regulations Assessment IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan JLR Jaguar Land Rover LEP Local Enterprise Partnership LDS Local Development Scheme LSV Local Service Village MM Main Modification MOA/MOU Memorandum of Agreement/Understanding MSV Main Service Village NE Natural England NPPF National Planning Policy Framework ¶/para paragraph PPG Planning Practice Guidance PPTS Planning Policy for Traveller Sites SA Sustainability Appraisal SAC Special Area of Conservation SAD South Staffordshire -
Advisory Visit Smestow Brook, Wolverhampton July 2019
Advisory Visit Smestow Brook, Wolverhampton July 2019 1.0 Introduction This report is the output of a site visit undertaken by Tim Jacklin of the Wild Trout Trust to the Smestow Brook, Wolverhampton on 29th July, 2019. Comments in this report are based on observations on the day of the site visit and discussions with Tarun Ingvorsen (Salmon in the Stour Project Officer) and Natalie Norton (Site Manager, Smestow Valley LNR) of Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust (BBCWT). Normal convention is applied throughout the report with respect to bank identification, i.e. the banks are designated left hand bank (LHB) or right hand bank (RHB) whilst looking downstream. 2.0 Catchment Overview The Smestow Brook is a tributary of the River Stour in the catchment of the River Severn. The Brook rises in the city of Wolverhampton and flows south, generally parallel to the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal, for approximately 12 miles to join the Stour near Stourton. The industrial history of the region has left its mark on the River Stour and its tributaries both through physical modification of the channel and pollution. The Stour catchment is the focus of the ‘Salmon in the Stour’ project led by BBCWT in partnership with the Environment Agency (EA), Worcestershire Wildlife Trust and Severn Rivers Trust (www.bbcwildlife.org.uk/salmoninthestour). The upper catchment of the Smestow Brook is located in an urbanised area and is designated as a heavily modified waterbody under the Water Framework Directive (Table 1), and has an overall ecological potential of moderate. It is currently rated as failing for the specific pollutants nickel and its compounds and tributyltin compounds.