XVIII Airborne and JTF South
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
XVIII AIRBORNE CORPS ASSOCIATION SKY DRAGONS Spring 2012 ------82ND DOMINATES XVIII ABN CORPS NCO and SOLDIER of YEAR COMPETITION
XVIII AIRBORNE CORPS ASSOCIATION SKY DRAGONS Spring 2012 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 82ND DOMINATES XVIII ABN CORPS NCO AND SOLDIER OF YEAR COMPETITION Left to Right – CSM (Ret) Ted Gaweda, Pfc. Jeremy Shivick, Sgt. Jason Thomas, Alan Yeater On 5 April in a ceremony conducted at Sports USA, a huge sports bar at Ft. Bragg, North Carolina, two paratroopers of the XVIII Airborne Corps' 82nd Airborne Division were selected as the XVIII Airborne Corps' 2012 NCO and Soldier of the Year. They were Sgt. Jason T. Thomas, 26, and Pfc. Jeremy Shivick, 21. Both Soldiers are assigned to the 1st Platoon, C Company, 2nd Battalion, 505th Parachute Infantry Regiment, which is part of the division's 3rd Brigade Combat Team (BCT). This is 2 the first time that both winners were from the same unit. The competition was held from 2 to 4 April, and the winners were announced during the ceremony which was presided over by the Ft. Bragg Garrison Command Sergeant Major (CSM) Samuel Campbell and the command sergeant major of XVIII Abn Corps' NCO Academy, CSM Nicolino Parisi. These were four days of grueling, early morning and late night events which included basic Soldier skills, the Army physical fitness test, a written exam, urban map orienteering, M4 rifle qualification, a weapons event, and an interview board. The competition certainly challenged the confidence and motivation of the Soldiers. Twenty-one Soldiers competed, representing each subordinate unit of the XVIII Abn Corps. Spc. Michael C. Lauritzen, from Jackson, Michigan, assigned to the 716th MP Battalion, 16th MP Brigade, Ft. Campbell, Kentucky, was quoted saying, “I'm grateful for being here, glad that my leadership had the confidence in me to compete at this level. -
JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters
Joint Publication 3-33 Joint Task Force Headquarters 30 July 2012 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides joint doctrine for the formation and employment of a joint task force (JTF) headquarters to command and control joint operations. It provides guidance on the JTF headquarters’ role in planning, preparing, executing, and assessing JTF operations. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations and provides the doctrinal basis for US military coordination with other US Government departments and agencies during operations and for US military involvement in multinational operations. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs) and prescribes joint doctrine for operations, education, and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing their appropriate plans. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of the overall objective. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subunified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, the Services, and combat support agencies. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise. -
Suez 1956 24 Planning the Intervention 26 During the Intervention 35 After the Intervention 43 Musketeer Learning 55
Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd i 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East Louise Kettle 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiiiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © Louise Kettle, 2018 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road, 12(2f) Jackson’s Entry, Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 11/1 3 Adobe Sabon by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd, and printed and bound in Great Britain. A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 3795 0 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 3797 4 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 3798 1 (epub) The right of Louise Kettle to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iivv 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Contents Acknowledgements vii 1. Learning from History 1 Learning from History in Whitehall 3 Politicians Learning from History 8 Learning from the History of Military Interventions 9 How Do We Learn? 13 What is Learning from History? 15 Who Learns from History? 16 The Learning Process 18 Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 21 2. -
The Courage of General Matthew Ridgway
The Courage of General Matthew Ridgway Full Lesson Plan COMPELLING QUESTION How can acting with courage help you accomplish your identity and purpose? VIRTUE Courage DEFINITION Courage is the capacity to overcome fear in order to do good. LESSON OVERVIEW In this lesson, students will explore the life of Matthew Ridgway and his role in the Korean War. Students will understand how Matthew Ridgway’s courage helped save the United States’ and United Nations’ forces during the Korean War. Through his example, they will learn how they can use courage in their own lives to accomplish their purpose. OBJECTIVES • Students will analyze General Matthew Ridgway’s performance during the Korean War. • Students will understand how to use courage to accomplish their purpose. • Students will apply their knowledge of courage to their own lives. BACKGROUND The Korean War was an outgrowth of an unstable situation on the Korean Peninsula at the conclusion of the Second World War. In August 1945, the Soviet Union declared war on the Empire of Japan. With the endorsement of the United States, Soviet forces seized land in the northern part of the peninsula, stopping at the 38th Parallel. The United States then occupied the southern half. Two different political regimes with opposing views emerged from this situation, creating the perfect recipe for conflict. War broke out in June 1950. North Korea, hoping to assert its dominance over the entire peninsula, invaded South Korea and made quick progress. South Korea, supported by United States and United https://voicesofhistory.org BACKGROUND Nations forces, fell back around the port city of Pusan. -
JP 3-33 Joint Task Force Headquarters Organization and Staffing
Joint Publication 3-33 Joint Task Force Headquarters 16 February 2007 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides joint doctrine for the formation and employment of a joint task force (JTF) headquarters to command and control joint operations. It provides guidance on the JTF headquarters role in planning, preparing, executing, and assessing JTF operations. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in operations and provides the doctrinal basis for interagency coordination and for US military involvement in multinational operations. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs) and prescribes joint doctrine for operations and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing their appropriate plans. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of the overall objective. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the commanders of combatant commands, subunified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, and the Services. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise between the contents of this publication and the contents of Service publications, this publication will take precedence unless the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, normally in coordination with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has provided more current and specific guidance. -
Fiscal Year 2021 Efmb Locations
Host Unit/Site Dates Test Board Chairperson EFMB Slot POC/OIC/NCOIC FISCAL YEAR 2021 EFMB LOCATIONS In-Processing: 2nd Stryker Brigade Combat 26 September 2020 2nd Fl., BLDG 11265, 23rd St. Team, 2nd Infantry Division Standardization Dates: JBLM, WA 98433 2nd Fl., BLDG 11265, 23rd St. 27 – 1 October 2020 JBLM, WA 98433 Test Site: Testing Dates: COMM: (253) 878-0449 Joint Base Lewis-McChord, 2 – 8 October 2020 DSN: (253) 447-2284 COMM: (502) 712-5819 WA Approx. 50 Candidates In-Processing: 13 October 2020 1st Medical Brigade Standardization Dates: 33026 Support Ave. 33026 Support Ave. 13 – 23 October 2020 Fort Hood, TX 76544 Fort Hood, TX 76544 Test Site: Testing Dates: Fort Hood, TX 24 – 30 October 2020 COMM (254) 288-4118 COMM (254) 288-4118 Approx. 100 Candidates In-Processing: 25 October 2020 101st Airborne Division Standardization Dates: 2700 Indiana Avenue 2700 Indiana Avenue 25 – 30 October 2020 Fort Campbell KY, 42223 Test Site: Fort Campbell KY, 42223 Testing Dates: Fort Campbell, KY 31 October – 6 November 2020 Comm: 270-798-5880 Comm: 270-412-4193 Approx. 300 Candidates In-Processing: 5 November 2020 44th Medical Brigade 4204 Longstreet Road 4204 Longstreet Road Standardization Dates: Bldg. A-1983 Bldg. A-1983 5 – 10 November 2020 Test Site: Fort Bragg, NC 28310 Fort Bragg, NC 28310 Testing Dates: Fort Bragg, NC 11 – 17 November 2020 Comm: 910-432-9548 Comm: 910-568-7688 Approx. 150 Candidates In-Processing: 4 December 2020 25th Infantry Division 130 Grimes Street, Unit 5 (Hamilton 130 Grimes Street, Unit 5 (Hamilton Standardization Dates: Trailers), Rm 17 Trailers), Rm 17 4 - 11 December 2020 Test Site: Schofield Barracks, HI 96857 Schofield Barracks, HI 96857 Testing Dates: Schofield Barracks, HI 12 - 18 December 2020 Comm: (808) 787-5429 Comm: (808) 787-5427 Approx. -
Three US Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM) "Lessons Learned" Reports for the Period of the Surge of Forces in Or About 2007 for Operation Iraqi Freedom
Description of document: Three US Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM) "Lessons Learned" reports for the period of the surge of forces in or about 2007 for Operation Iraqi Freedom Requested date: 28-August-2010 Released date: 01-November-2010 Posted date: 29-November-2010 Titles of documents: Operation Iraqi Freedom, January 2007 to December 2008 - The Comprehensive Approach: an Iraq Case Study, 16 February 2010 Joint Tactical Environment: An Analysis of Urban Operations in Iraq, 2008 (undated) Operation Iraqi Freedom October to December 2007 - Counterinsurgency Targeting and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (25 March 2008) Source of document: U.S. Joint Forces Command FOIA Requestor Service Center (J00L) 1562 Mitscher Avenue, Ste 200 Norfolk, VA 23551-2488 Fax: (757) 836-0058 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. -
Chapter Five: the Significance of the Sunken Vessels of Operation Crossroads
CHAPTER FIVE: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SUNKEN VESSELS OF OPERATION CROSSROADS James P. Delgado Ruminating on the nature of nuclear wars after The ships assembled at Bikini for Operation Operation Crossroads, the Joint Chiefs of Staff Crossroads and sunk in the tests represent 34 concluded that with atomic weapons “it is quite years of naval design and development, from possible to depopulate vast areas of the earth’s the oldest ship, Arkansas, built in 1912, to the surface, leaving only vestigial remnants of man’s newest, ARDC-13, which was rushed to material works.’” Forty-four years after completion in March 1946. These vessels, as Crossroads, Bikini Atoll stands depopulated. Its the tests’ planners intended, reflect a range of people, relocated for the tests, have not ship types, construction methods, and hull permanently resettled Bikini. Efforts to “clean forms, and in total represent in microcosm up” Bikini island after a 1968 declaration that many of the elements of a typical naval force, it was once again safe for human habitation with an aircraft carrier, battleships, cruisers, erased all traces of Operation Crossroads from destroyers, submarines, attack transports, and the surface of the island. Geometrically landing craft. Some of these vessels, such as planted palms and rows of uniform concrete USS Anderson, are the sole surviving intact houses for a reestablished Bikinian community representatives of specific classes of ships. brought a new look to the island. Found Many of the ships had long and significant unsafe for continual habitation in 1978, Bikini careers, beginning with the Veracruz landings was again abandoned, and today hosts a small, of 1914 and the First World War. -
Global War on Terror (GWOT)/Regional War on Terror (RWOT)
THE JOINT STAFF (TJS) Global War on Terror (GWOT)/Regional War on Terror (RWOT) Operations and Maintenance, Defense Wide Budget Activity 01, Operating Forces, and Budget Activity 04, Administrative and Service-Wide Activities Detail by Subactivity Group I. Description of Operations Financed: The Joint Staff (TJS) supplemental funding request provides for the essential joint readiness and training required to maintain U.S. capability to employ joint combat forces effectively to meet contingencies worldwide. It provides tangible demonstrations of U.S. resolve and joint readiness capability to project a military presence anywhere in the world, in support of national interests and commitments to U.S. allies. Joint training with allies provides the necessary interaction to test and evaluate combined systems, lines of communication, and technical agreements. The Joint Exercise Program (JEP), Combating Terrorism Readiness Initiatives Fund (CbT RIF), the Combatant Commander (CoCOM) Initiatives Fund (CCIF), and the CoCOM Command and Control Initiatives Program (C2IP) support emergent requirements of the CoCOMs. This budget also includes the Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence for the Warrior (C4IFTW) program, including the Coalition Warrior Interoperability Demonstration (CWID). TJS provides approximately 58 percent of these funds to Operating Forces. • Joint Exercise Program (JEP): The JEP is the principal vehicle for achieving joint and multinational training. This program provides funds for the transportation of personnel and equipment for worldwide exercises. It provides the primary means for COCOMs to train battle staffs and forces in joint and combined operations, evaluate war plans, and execute engagement strategies as well as providing an opportunity to stress strategic transportation and C4I systems and evaluate their readiness and supportability across the full range of military operations. -
Main Command Post-Operational Detachments
C O R P O R A T I O N Main Command Post- Operational Detachments (MCP-ODs) and Division Headquarters Readiness Stephen Dalzell, Christopher M. Schnaubelt, Michael E. Linick, Timothy R. Gulden, Lisa Pelled Colabella, Susan G. Straus, James Sladden, Rebecca Jensen, Matthew Olson, Amy Grace Donohue, Jaime L. Hastings, Hilary A. Reininger, Penelope Speed For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2615 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0225-7 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project entitled Multi- Component Units and Division Headquarters Readiness sponsored by U.S. -
Army Medical Specialist Corps in Vietnam Colonel Ann M
Army Medical Specialist Corps in Vietnam Colonel Ann M. Ritchie Hartwick Background Medical Groups which were established and dissolved as medical needs dictated throughout Though American military advisers had been the war. On 1 March 1970, Army medical dual in French Indochina since World War II, staff functions were reduced with the and the American Advisory Group with 128 establishment of the U.S. Army Medical positions was assigned to Saigon in 1950, the Command, Vietnam (Provisional). Army Surgeon General did not establish a hospital in Vietnam until 1962 (the Eighth The 68th Medical Group, operational on 18 Field Hospital at Nha Trang) to support March 1966, was located in Long Binh and American personnel in country. Between 1964 supported the medical mission in the III and IV and 1969 the number of American military combat tactical zones (CTZs). The 55th personnel in Vietnam increased from 23,000 Medical Group, operational in June 1966, to 550,000 as American combat units were supported the medical mission in the northern deployed to replace advisory personnel in II CTZ and was located at Qui Nhon. The 43d support of military operations. Medical Group, operational in November 1965, supported the medical mission for Between 1964 and 1973 the Army Surgeon southern II CTZ and was located at Nha Trang. General deployed 23 additional hospitals And, in October 1967, the 67th Medical established as fixed medical installations with Group, located at Da Nang, assumed area support missions. These included surgical, medical support responsibility for ICTZ. evacuation, and field hospitals and a 3,000 bed convalescent center, supported by a centralized blood bank, medical logistical support Army Physical Therapists installations, six medical laboratories, and The first member of the Army Medical multiple air ambulance ("Dust Off") units. -
Cofs, USA MEDCOM
RESUME OF SERVICE CAREER of JEROME VON FOUST, Brigadier General YEARS OF ACTIVE COMMISSIONED SERVICE Over 29 DATE OF RETIREMENT 31 October 1996 MILITARY SCHOOLS ATTENDED Medical Corps Officer Basic and Advance Courses United States Army Command and General Staff College United States Army War College EDUCATIONAL DEGREES Troy State University - BS Degree - Biology St. Mary's University - MS Degree - ADPS Business FOREIGN LANGUAGE(S) None recorded MAJOR DUTY ASSIGNMENTS FROM TO ASSIGNMENT May 66 Jul 66 Student, Medical Corps Officer Basic Course, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas Jul 66 Feb 67 Student, Officer Rotary Wing Aviator Course, Troop Command, United States Army Pilot/Helicopter Course, Fort Wolters, Texas Feb 67 Jun 67 Student, Officer Rotary Wing Aviator Course Phase II and III, United States Army Aviation School, Fort Rucker, Alabama Jun 67 Mar 68 Medical Evacuation Pilot, 54th Medical Detachment (Helicopter Ambulance), United States Army Pacific, Republic of Vietnam Mar 68 Aug 68 Rotary Wing Aviator/Medical Evacuation Pilot, 45th Medical Company, United States Army Pacific, Republic of Vietnam Oct 68 Dec 68 Student, Army Aviation Safety Officer Course, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California Dec 68 Jun 70 Operations Officer, later, Maintenance Officer, 421st Medical Company (Air Ambulance), United States Army Europe and Seventh Army, Germany Jun 70 Mar 71 Safety Officer, 61st Medical Battalion, 67th Medical Group, United States Army Pacific, Republic of Vietnam Apr 71 Nov 71 Commander, 237th