NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 16 Number 2 Article 5 Fall 1991 The Bhopal Disaster Litigation: It's Not over Yet Tim Covell Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Recommended Citation Tim Covell, The Bhopal Disaster Litigation: It's Not over Yet, 16 N.C. J. INT'L L. 279 (1991). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol16/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. The Bhopal Disaster Litigation: It's Not over Yet Cover Page Footnote International Law; Commercial Law; Law This article is available in North Carolina Journal of International Law: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol16/ iss2/5 The Bhopal Disaster Litigation: It's Not Over Yet Tim Covell* I. Introduction On December 3, 1984, forty tons' of deadly methyl isocyanate gas escaped from a Union Carbide plant and spread over the city of Bhopal, India.2 As many as 2,100 people died soon after the gas leak and approximately 200,000 suffered injuries, 3 making it the worst in- dustrial disaster to date.4 As of December 1990, the official death toll reached 3,828. 5 The legal community immediately became in- volved, filing the first suit against Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) in the United States four days after the disaster.6 Eventually, injured parties filed 145 lawsuits for damages against UCC in the United 7 States, and 6,500 against Union Carbide India, Ltd.