DOCSLIB.ORG

Chemical Disaster Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chemical Disaster Management CCHHEEMMIICCAALL DDIISSAASSTTEERR MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DISASTER MANAGEMENT MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS NIDM Building, 5-B, IIPA Campus, IP Estate Paryavaran Bhawan, Mahatma Gandhi Road, New Delhi - 110002 CGO Complex, Lodi Road, Tel: 23702445, 23702432, 23705583; Fax: 23702446 New Delhi - 110003 Website: www.nidm.net Website: www.envfor.nic.in National Institute of Disaster Management Ministry of Environment and Forest Ministry of Home Affairs Govt. of India © 2009 MoEF and NIDM ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The National Workshop on “Chemical Disaster Management” was organised by National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM) as a national consultation process towards Preparation of National Action Plan on Chemical Disaster Management. Financial grant was provided by the Ministry of Environment & Forests (MoEF) for conduct of workshop and printing of the proceeding volume. The workshop was organised under the supervision and guidance of Shri P. G. Dhar Chakrabarti, Executive Director, National Institute of Disaster Management, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi and Dr. G. K. Pandey, Sr. Advisor and Dr. Chhanda Chowdhury, Director, Hazardous Substances Management Division (HSMD) in the Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt. of India. The Organising committee acknowledges the cooperation of dignitaries of inaugural session, subject experts on various themes, related agencies, corporate/ industry, state authorities, non-governmental organisations, and all individuals who made the workshop a success. Suggestions and Inputs from Shri R.H. Khwaja, Additional Secretary, MoEF; Dr. Indrani Chandrasekhran, Advisor, Planning Commission and Prof. Santosh Kumar, NIDM, and whole-hearted support of Shri J. N. Jha, Ms. Geeta Sharma, Shri Surinder Bisht and other staff members of NIDM are acknowledged. EDITORS Dr. Anil K. Gupta Associate Professor, NIDM Sreeja S. Nair Assistant Professor, NIDM Shri Shard Deputy Director, MoEF Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Context ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Objectives of the workshop ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3. National Disaster Management Guidelines ...................................................................................... 3 2. Inaugural Session ................................................................................................................... 7 2.1. Welcome Address ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Special Address ........................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3. Inaugural Address ..................................................................................................................................... 10 3. Thematic Sessions.............................................................................................................................................. 11 3.1. National and International Status - Recent Development & Issues ....................................... 11 3.2. GIS based Emergency Planning & Response System .................................................................. 14 3.3. Strategy of Community Awareness for Emergency Preparedness ....................................... 16 3.4 Capacity Building and Knowledge Needs ....................................................................................... 19 3.5 National Disaster Management Framework................................................................................... 22 3.6 Public Health Dimension in Chemical Incidents .......................................................................... 26 3.7 Chemical Accident Information & Reporting System ................................................................. 28 4. Agency Presentations .......................................................................................................... 31 4.1 Oil Industry Safety Directorate ............................................................................................................ 31 4.2 Indian Institute of Toxicological Research ....................................................................................... 32 4.3 Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce & Industry .......................................................... 33 4.4 Indian Council of Medical Research .................................................................................................. 35 4.5 Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation ............................................................................. 37 4.6 Directorate General of Factory Advice Service and Labour Institutes................................... 39 4.7 Police and Homegaurds ......................................................................................................................... 41 5. State Presentations .............................................................................................................. 43 5.1 Andhra Pradesh ......................................................................................................................................... 43 5.2 Chattisgarh .................................................................................................................................................. 43 5.3 Delhi .............................................................................................................................................................. 44 5.4 Gujarat ........................................................................................................................................................... 45 5.5 Karnataka ..................................................................................................................................................... 46 5.6 Kerala ............................................................................................................................................................ 46 5.7 Mizoram ....................................................................................................................................................... 47 5.8 Maharashtra ................................................................................................................................................ 48 5.9 Orissa ............................................................................................................................................................. 48 5.10 Tamil Nadu .................................................................................................................................................. 49 5.11 Uttar Pradesh .............................................................................................................................................. 50 6. Group Discussion and Recommendations........................................................................ 53 7. Valedictory Session ............................................................................................................... 55 Appendix A: List of Delegates .................................................................................. 57 Organising Team......................................................................................................... 71 Chemical Disaster Management INTRODUCTION Context India is developing as a key global player in the industrial and technology sector. Rapid industrialization has increased the hazard, risk and vulnerability to the industry and the environment. Major Chemical (Industrial) disasters are low in frequency but are very significant in the terms of loss of lives, injuries, environmental impact and property damage. Frequency and severity of chemical disasters has increased in last few years due to rapid development of chemical and petrochemical industries and increase in size of plants, storage and carriers, specifically in densely populated areas. At present there are over 1724 Major Accident Hazards (MAH) units and other small and medium–sized industries all across the nation and new industries are also establishing at a rapid rate. Chemical accidents can occur due to lack of safety measure, technical break down, or due to a human error. It, thereby, initiates a series of uncontrolled physiochemical phenomenon such as runaway chemical reactions, large spills, fires and explosions. These phenomenon eventually targets both human and non-human in the form of immediate and residual or long term consequences. Thus, it is imperative to develop preventive measures like adoption of safer engineering practices, improved safety devices and elimination of human errors by regular checks. The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) and National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM), Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi jointly organized a two days National Workshop on ‘Chemical Disaster Management’ during September 30 and October 01, 2008, at Mirza Ghalib Hall, Scope Complex, New Delhi. The workshop was aimed to facilitate a policy level national dialogue on issues and challenges in the area of chemical disaster risk management at various
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AN INTRODUCTION to AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY This Page Intentionally Left Blank €ƒÂ€ an INTRODUCTION to AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
    AN INTRODUCTION TO AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY This page intentionally left blank AN INTRODUCTION TO AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY MIKKO NIKINMAA Professor of Zoology, Department of Biology, Laboratory of Animal Physiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Academic press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1GB, UK 225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangement with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein). Notices Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • The Killer Plant That Keeps on Killing
    777 The newsletter of the Bhopal Medical Appeal, October 2003 The killer plant that keeps on killing In Union Carbide’s abandoned pesticide factory in Bhopal, deadly chemicals lie exposed in the open air. Eighteen monsoons have washed the poisons deep into the soil - and into local drinking wells. Read the full story on page 4. SAAT SAAT together together together This newsletter’s name arose from an attempt to capture the spirit of the Bhopal Medical Appeal. Someone suggested, ‘saat, saat, saat’, which in Hindi means ‘together, together, together’, but with a slight twist of the tongue could also mean ‘seven, seven, seven.’ Nightmare The Appeal was launched in 1994, when a man from Bhopal came to without end Britain to tell whoever would listen about the calamitous condition of page 4 the still suffering victims of the Union Carbide gas disaster. Those who met him learned that after ten years, the survivors had received no meaningful medical help. (Unless one is prepared to accept that aspirin is a cure-all for the dreadful illnesses visited on them.) The survivors realised that they must help themselves, because nobody else would. They wanted to open their own free clinic for gas victims. They were joined in the UK by a few individuals who put the mechanics of the Appeal together. They were in turn joined in this effort by you, and other like minded people. Carbide’s factory ‘We’ means all of us, all together. still killing Our first appeal, which appeared in The Guardian and The Observer on page 6 the 10th anniversary, produced a response so generous that we were able to buy a building, recruit doctors and staff and open the clinic.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Molecular Ecotoxicology: a Research Framework
    Genetic and Molecular Ecotoxicology: A Research Framework Susan Anderson,1 Walter Sadinski,1 Lee Shugart,2 Peter Brussard,3 Michael Depledge,4 Tim Ford,5 JoEllen Hose,6 John Stegeman,7 William Suk,8 Isaac Wirgin,9 and Gerald Wogan0 1Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California; 2Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; 3University of Nevada Reno, Reno, Nevada; 4University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK; 5Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts; 6 CCidental College, Los Angeles, California; 7Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, Woods Hole, Massachusetts; 8National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; 9New York University Medical Center, Tuxedo, New York; 10Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts Participants at the Napa Conference on Genetic and Molecular Ecotoxicology assessed the status of this field in light of heightened concerns about the genetic effects of exposure to hazardous substances and recent advancements in our capabilities to measure those effects. We present here a synthesis of the ideas discussed throughout the conference, including definitions of important concepts in the field and critical research needs and opportunities. While there were many opinions expressed on these topics, there was general agreement that there are substantive new opportuni- ties to improve the impact of genetic and molecular ecotoxicology on prediction of sublethal effects of exposure to hazardous substances. Future studies should emphasize integration of genetic ecotoxicology, ecological genetics, and molecular biology and should be directed toward improving our understanding of the ecological implications of genotoxic responses. Ecological implications may be assessed at either the population or ecosys- tem level; however, a population-level focus may be most pragmatic.
    [Show full text]
  • Impressions of Bhopal Fiona Macleod Introduction I Had Not Realised How Beautiful Bhopal Is
    Loss Prevention Bulletin 240 December 2014 | 3 Overview Impressions of Bhopal Fiona Macleod Introduction I had not realised how beautiful Bhopal is. View of Upper Lake, Bhopal (FM) Sambhavna Clinic Bhopal (FM) When news broke of the Union Carbide accident in India, Afterwards I went to the factory. It is still there. I had just started my first job as a chemical engineer in What remains of the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) Scotland. Many years later, I found myself involved with a pesticide factory is invisible from the road, lost inside a major investment program in India along with a team of well- jungle of greenery. It would be easy to miss it, along with the educated, hard-working, ingenious and inventive Indian memorial on Kali Parade. The brutalist modern representation colleagues. Despite the common language (English), I was of a grieving mother with her dead infant was being used to struck by the cultural differences and it awoke an intense dry jeans; the squat statue was artistically improved by the curiosity to understand what had really happened in the early denim decoration. hours of 03 December 1984 in Bhopal. I read every book that On the wall behind is a colourful mural with a poem: I could get my hands on1234 and finally visited the capital of History says, don’t hope Madhya Pradesh in June 2013. On this side of the grave. Some Indian friends arranged for me to visit the Sambhavna But then, once in a lifetime Trust clinic in Bhopal. Set up in 1995 it provides free treatment The longed-for tidal wave to those who need it most.
    [Show full text]
  • Shortcomings of the Laboratory-Derived Median Lethal Concentration for Predicting Mortality in Field Populations: Exposure Duration and Latent Mortality
    Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 23, No. 9, pp. 2147±2153, 2004 q 2004 SETAC Printed in the USA 0730-7268/04 $12.00 1 .00 SHORTCOMINGS OF THE LABORATORY-DERIVED MEDIAN LETHAL CONCENTRATION FOR PREDICTING MORTALITY IN FIELD POPULATIONS: EXPOSURE DURATION AND LATENT MORTALITY YUAN ZHAO* and MICHAEL C. NEWMAN Department of Environmental and Aquatic Animal Health, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062-1346, USA (Received 15 October 2003; Accepted 9 February 2004) AbstractÐExposure duration and intensity (concentration or dose) determine lethal effects of toxicants. However, environmental regulators have focused on exposure intensity and have considered duration only peripherally. Conventional testing for toxicology tends to ®x exposure time and to use the median lethal concentration (LC50) at that time to quantify mortality. Fixing the exposure duration and selecting the 50% mortality level for reasons of statistical and logistical convenience result in the loss of ecologically relevant information generated at all other times and ignore latent mortality that manifests after the exposure ends. In the present study, we used survival analysis, which is widely employed in other ®elds, to include both time and concentration as covariates and to quantify latent mortality. This was done with two contrasting toxicants, copper sulfate (CuSO4) and sodium pentachlorophenol (NaPCP). Amphipods (Hyalella azteca) were exposed to different toxicant concentrations, and the percentage mortalities were noted both during and after the exposure ended. For CuSO4 at the conventional 48-h LC50 concentrations, the predicted proportions dead after including latent mortality were 65 to 85%, not 50%.
    [Show full text]
  • European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals
    EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR ECOTOXICOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY OF CHEMICALS EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR ECOTOXICOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY OF CHEMICALS ECETOC at a glance 2 Purpose 3 Values 3 Vision 3 Mission 3 Approach 3 Membership 4 ECETOC Member Companies 4 Membership benefits 5 Message from the Chairman 6 ECETOC Board of Administration 7 Report from the Secretary General 8 Science Programme 10 Foreword from the Scientific Committee Chairman 10 ECETOC revises its science strategy 11 Summary of the 2011 Science Programme 12 Highlights of 2011 15 Task forces established 16 Task forces completed 18 Workshops 21 Symposia and other meetings 24 Science Awards 28 Long-range Research Initiative 29 Communication 31 Publications 31 Online communication 32 External Representation 32 Members of the Scientific Committee 34 Members of the Secretariat 34 Finance 35 Abbreviations 36 ECETOC I European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals I Annual Report 2011 I page 2 Introduction Membership Message Board of Report from Science Science Long-range Communication Members of Finance Abbreviations from the Administration the Secretary Programme Awards Research the Scientific Chairman General Initiative Committee Established in 1978, ECETOC is Europe’s leading industry association for developing and promoting top quality science in human and environmental risk assessment of chemicals. Members include the main companies with interests in the manufacture and use of chemicals, biomaterials and pharmaceuticals, and organisations active in these fields. ECETOC is the scientific forum where member company experts meet and co-operate with government and academic scientists, to evaluate and assess the available data, identify gaps in knowledge and recommend research, and publish critical reviews on the ecotoxicology and toxicology of chemicals, biomaterials and pharmaceuticals.
    [Show full text]
  • Secunderabad to Raipur Bus Time Table
    Secunderabad To Raipur Bus Time Table Thornie enshroud formally. Brock often beseeched pharmacologically when pudgy Tibold rejoin confidently and irrationalises her Galilean. Radial and anthropomorphous Demetri reoccupying her anthropophagy effervesces or interrogating overside. Reach Pune from Nagpur by car, bus, taxi or car relevant to compare care and! There lie plenty of berth and government bus booking services offering options like sleeper bus booking, mini bus booking, or are wedding bus on rent. Route raipur bus timings, secunderabad super fast and arriving at goibibo train! Amar strives towards making rigorous training sessions comfortable and easy. Some resent the places that surface should definitely visit far in Raipur are Dialogue in really Dark, Nukkad, the Teafe, Girnar Restaurant, Cafe Junoon, Pashmina, Sukhsagar, to name or few. Bhopal, India may apply, any full details Indian. Its intriguing setting and well as the fare system applicable for the most frequently added services as well as you for providing high for trains. We look at! Selecting a bus timings and raipur to find small joints which train name gives road conditions. Irctc train time table of raipur to get to jn to raipur, secunderabad jn railway stations nagpur? Contact us or reach call to us at public office view your queries. Find perhaps the transport options for fresh trip from Nagpur to Raipur right here. Raipur Jn train tickets, and provides raipur to nagpur train IRCTC train Enquiry Services price. You may apply. Travel Guide series is vital information for the global traveller. The table indian railways that this team addresses all mandatory for its service by bus timings, timing and the most ignored and ends at.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures
    Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks SCHER Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks SCENIHR Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety SCCS Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures The SCHER approved this opinion at its 15th plenary of 22 November 2011 The SCENIHR approved this opinion at its 16th plenary of 30 November 2011 The SCCS approved this opinion at its 14th plenary of 14 December 2011 1 Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures About the Scientific Committees Three independent non-food Scientific Committees provide the Commission with the scientific advice it needs when preparing policy and proposals relating to consumer safety, public health and the environment. The Committees also draw the Commission's attention to the new or emerging problems which may pose an actual or potential threat. They are: the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS), the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER) and the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) and are made up of external experts. In addition, the Commission relies upon the work of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the European Centre for Disease prevention and Control (ECDC) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). SCCS The Committee shall provide opinions on questions concerning all types of health and safety risks (notably chemical, biological, mechanical and other physical risks) of non- food consumer products (for example: cosmetic products and their ingredients, toys, textiles, clothing, personal care and household products such as detergents, etc.) and services (for example: tattooing, artificial sun tanning, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection
    ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection Technical Report No. 138 EUROPEAN CENTRE OFOR EC TOXICOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY OF CHEMICALS ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection Technical Report No. 138 Brussels, March 2021 ISSN-2079-1526-138 (online) ECETOC TR No. 138 1 ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection 224504 ECETOC Technical Report No. 138 © Copyright – ECETOC AISBL European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals Rue Belliard 40, B-1040 Brussels, Belgium. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Applications to reproduce, store, copy or translate should be made to the Secretary General. ECETOC welcomes such applications. Reference to the document, its title and summary may be copied or abstracted in data retrieval systems without subsequent reference. The content of this document has been prepared and reviewed by experts on behalf of ECETOC with all possible care and from the available scientific information. It is provided for information only. ECETOC cannot accept any responsibility or liability and does not provide a warranty for any use or interpretation of the material contained in the publication. ECETOC TR No. 138 2 ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection ECETOC Guidance on Dose Selection Table of Contents 1. SUMMARY 6 2. INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND AND PRINCIPLES 9 2.1. Background and Principles 9 2.2. Current Regulatory Framework and Guidance 10 2.2.1. Historical perspectives and the evolution of test guidelines 10 2.2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Toxicology: Environmental Contaminants and Their National and International Regulation" (2012)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research US Geological Survey 2012 Wildlife Toxicology: Environmental Contaminants and Their aN tional and International Regulation K. Christiana Grim Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Anne Fairbrother EcoSciences Barnett A. Rattner U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Geology Commons, Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons, Other Earth Sciences Commons, and the Other Environmental Sciences Commons Grim, K. Christiana; Fairbrother, Anne; and Rattner, Barnett A., "Wildlife Toxicology: Environmental Contaminants and Their National and International Regulation" (2012). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 969. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/969 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in New Directions in Conservation Medicine: Applied Cases in Ecological Health, edited by A. Alonso Aguirre, Richard S. Ostfield, and Peter Daszak (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012). Authors K. Christiana Grim, D.V.M. Research Associate Center for Species Survival Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Front Royal, Vrrginia Anne Fairbrother, D.V.M., M.S., Ph.D. Senior Managing Scientist EcoSciences Exponent Seattle, Washington Barnett A. Rattner, Ph.D. Ecotoxicologist U.S. Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Beltsville Laboratory Beltsville, Maryland WILDLIFE TOXICOLOGY Environmental Contaminants and Their National and International Regulation K. Christiana Grim, Anne Fairbrother, and Barnett A.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL HEALTH AND CONSUMER PROTECTION Directorate C – Scientific Opinions on Health Matters Unit C2 – Management of Scientific Committees I Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment Brussels, C2/JCD/csteeop/Ter91100/D(0) SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON TOXICITY, ECOTOXICITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (CSTEE) Opinion on THE AVAILABLE SCIENTIFIC APPROACHES TO ASSESS THE POTENTIAL EFFECTS AND RISK OF CHEMICALS ON TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS Opinion expressed at the 19th CSTEE plenary meeting Brussels, 9 November 2000 CSTEE OPINION ON THE AVAILABLE SCIENTIFIC APPROACHES TO ASSESS THE POTENTIAL EFFECTS AND RISK OF CHEMICALS ON TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS FOREWORD AND SCOPE OF THIS DOCUMENT The concept "terrestrial environment" cannot be easily defined. It is characterised as the part of the biosphere that is not covered by water, less than one third of the total surface. From a geological viewpoint it just represents a thin line (a few meters wide) of the interface between both the solid (soil) and the gaseous (atmosphere) phases of the Earth, several orders of magnitude wider than this line. However, from the biological point of view, this thin line concentrates all non-aquatic living organisms, including human beings. Humans use the terrestrial environment for living and developing most of their activities, which include the commercial production of other species by agriculture and farming. Human activities deeply modify the terrestrial environment. Particularly in developed areas such as Europe, the landscape has been intensively modified by agricultural, mining, industrial and urban activities and only in a small proportion (mostly in extreme conditions such as high mountains, Northern latitudes, wetlands or semi-desert areas) of the European surface the landscape still resembles naive conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BHOPAL DISASTER the Union Carbide Factory
    HEALTH 206 THE BHOPAL DISASTER the Union Carbide factory. One of them is Ramnarayan Jadav, a driver of the city corporation, who says that he had started Ashay Chitre, a film maker living in Bhopal’s prestigious Bharat feeling the gas around 11.30 itself. But he stayed on for at Bhawan, built by the state government to attract artists to this least another 45 minutes because “this much gas used to leak central Indian city, heard a commotion outside his window early every eighth day and we used to feel irritation in the chest and in the morning at about 3 a m. It was a chill December and all in the eyes. But finally everything used to calm down.” Even the windows of Chitre’s house were closed. As Chitre and his if the company had set off its warning siren then, many could wife Rohini, seven months pregnant, opened the window, they have escaped. got a whiff of gas. They immediately felt breathless and their eyes But nothing happened and many thousands woke up only and noses began to stream with a yellow fluid. between 12.30 and 1 am, by which time the gas was spreading Sensing danger, the couple grabbed a bedsheet and ran out in high concentrations. People woke up coughing violently and of the house. Unknown to them, all the neighbouring bunga- with eyes burning as if chilli powder had been flung into them. lows, which had telephones, had already been evacuated. Their As the irritation grew and breathing became impossible, they immediate neighbour, state labour minister Shamsunder Patidar fled, some with their families and many without.
    [Show full text]