Identification of Discrete Functional Subregions of the Human
Identification of discrete functional subregions of the human periaqueductal gray Ajay B. Satputea,1, Tor D. Wagerb, Julien Cohen-Adadc, Marta Bianciardid, Ji-Kyung Choid, Jason T. Buhlee, Lawrence L. Waldd, and Lisa Feldman Barretta,f aDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115; bDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309; cDepartment of Electrical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada H3T 1J4; Departments of dRadiology and fPsychiatry, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129; and eDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027 Edited by Marcus E. Raichle, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, and approved September 9, 2013 (received for review March 30, 2013) The midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) region is organized into Unfortunately however, standard fMRI is fundamentally lim- distinct subregions that coordinate survival-related responses ited in its resolution, making it uncertain which fMRI results lie during threat and stress [Bandler R, Keay KA, Floyd N, Price J in the PAG and which lie in other nearby nuclei. The overarching (2000) Brain Res 53 (1):95–104]. To examine PAG function in humans, issue is size and shape. The PAG is small and is shaped like a researchers have relied primarily on functional MRI (fMRI), but tech- hollow cylinder with an external diameter of ∼6 mm, a height of nological and methodological limitations have prevented research- ∼10 mm, and an internal diameter of ∼2–3 mm. The cerebral ers from localizing responses to different PAG subregions.
[Show full text]