Acrocephalus 33 (154/155): 297−300, 2012

A preliminary overview of List of the Italian Breeding Birds (Peronace et al. 2011). To promote the conservation of some of the monitoring for raptors in most endangered species, the Italian Ministry for the Predhodni pregled monitoringa populacij Environment issued the national action plans for the Lanner Falcon Falco biarmicus feldeggii, the Eleonora’s ptic roparic v Italiji Falcon F. eleonorae and the Neophron percnopterus (Andreotti & Leonardi 2007 & 2009, Spina & Leonardi 2007). A regional action plan Arianna Aradis1 & Alessandro Andreotti2 1 has been drafted for the conservation of the Griffon Università degli Studi di Palermo, Dipartimento di Vulture Gyps fulvus in (Schenk et al. 2008). Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, Lab. Zoologia applicata, V. le Scienze 13, IT–90128 Palermo, Italy, Monitoring is currently carried out by different actors e–mail: [email protected] and with different aims, especially to evaluate trends of 2 ISPRA - Istituto Superiore per la Ricerca e la common species and species of conservation concern. Protezione Ambientale, Via Cà Fornacetta, 9, IT–40064 Ozzano dell’Emilia, Bologna, Italy, Main players e–mail: [email protected] In Italy, many actors are promoting programmes for raptor monitoring: –– State Forestry Corp (CFS), Owing to its great latitudinal extension and –– Departments of several Universities (e.g. Milano, environmental heterogeneity, Italy hosts a relatively Palermo, Pavia, Urbino), large number of birds of prey. Considering both –– Institute for the Environmental Protection and diurnal and nocturnal species, 47 taxa are known Research – ISPRA, to occur regularly in the country, 31 of which breed –– National Parks (e.g. National Park; here, while two have gone extinct as breeders (Table ) and other protected areas 1). Furthermore, twice a year Italy is reached by a large instituted by national or regional laws, number of migrants on their way between Europe and –– Natural History Museums (e.g. Tridentine Museum Africa. Big concentrations of migrating raptors occur of Natural Sciences), in some important bottlenecks (e.g. Marettimo Island, –– NGOs (ALTURA – Associazione Tutela Uccelli Messina Strait, Monte Conero Promontory, Monte Rapaci e loro Ambienti; Legambiente; LIPU – Lega Beigua). Italiana Protezione Uccelli, BirdLife International partner in Italy; MEDRAPTORS – Mediterranean Table 1: Number of raptor species occurring in Italy Raptor Migration Network; Ornis Italica; WWF), –– Regional Administrations. Tabela 1: Število vrst ptic roparic, ki se pojavljajo v Italiji Co-operation has been promoted with foreign No. of breeding ornithologists to study vulture populations and raptor Family/ No. of all species/ species / Št. wintering and migration. Switzerland, Austria and Družina Št. vseh vrst gnezdečih vrst France are partners in the “International Monitoring” (IBM) project to follow the Accipitridae 27 15 birds’ movements across country borderlines. A Falconidae 10 7 tight collaboration with Slovenian and Croatian Strigidae 10 9 ornithologists is currently in progress within the framework of the Griffon Vulture monitoring programmes in the eastern . Since 2011, Italy has On a national scale, reviews on the status of raptors been involved in the European census of the wintering were published in 1992 (Brichetti et al. 1992) and Red Kite Milvus milvus, a project coordinated by 2003 (Brichetti & Fracasso 1993) for diurnal species LPO (Ligue pour la Protection des Oiseaux), France. and in 2006 (Brichetti & Fracasso 2006) for owls. Moreover, collaboration has been established with Among the species nesting in Italy, 17 are classified as Spanish researchers to study the migration of the Species of European Conservation Concern – SPECs Short-toed Eagle Circaetus gallicus through satellite (BirdLife International 2004), three are included tracking technology (University of Alicante) and the in the IUCN Red List (IUCN 2012), while four are M. migrans (Doñana Biological Station and Critically Endangered (CR) according to the Red CSIC). 297 A. Aradis & A. Andreotti: A preliminary overview of monitoring for raptors in Italy

The Italian Ministry for the Environment requires still scarce (e.g. ). The monitoring is generally monitoring data in order to report on the status of done at the local or regional levels and it is quite patchy protected species according to the Birds Directive, as across Italy. In some regions, atlases of breeding raptors well as to designate and manage Special Protection have been recently published following standardised Areas (SPAs) and Important Bird Areas (IBAs). methods (Aradis et al. 2012). Other frequent users of the data obtained Counts of migrating birds of prey have been carried from raptor monitoring are: (1) Co-ordinators of out mostly in the last two decades both during post- and reintroduction/restocking programmes to evaluate pre-breeding migration periods in several bottlenecks the status of the new established populations and to (mountain passes, promontories, small islands and formulate management decisions; (2) National Parks straits) to describe flyways and movements strategies to manage land use (e.g. presence of Goshawk Accipiter (e.g. Panuccio 2011). Some of this research work has gentilis and forest management plans) and to stipulate been the result of joint efforts based on simultaneous conservation actions; (3) Developers and advisors observations at different watchpoints (e.g. Agostini of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) 2002, Agostini et al. 2002). In recent years, satellite procedures: Regional Offices to assess the impact of telemetry has been used to carry out detailed studies local projects (wind farms, regional motorways etc.) on migration (e.g. Mellone et al. 2011). and the Commission for National Impact Assessment of the Ministry for the Environment to assess the Key species and key issues impact of major projects (e.g. bridge over the Messina Monitoring activities are carried out in different Strait, motorways). periods of the year, addressing different target species. In the breeding period, the species like Golden Eagle, National coverage Bonelli’s Eagle A. fasciata, Peregrine Falcon, Lanner Italy still lacks national coordination for raptor Falcon, Lesser Kestrel F. naumanni, Eleonora’s Falcon, monitoring. Some efforts have been made to promote Egyptian Vulture, Griffon Vulture and Lammergeier co-operation among groups working on the same receive fairly solid coverage across their entire breeding species, to standardize monitoring protocols and range. Red Kite, Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus, to assess the size of the breeding populations (e.g. Montagu’s Harrier Circus pygargus, Eagle Owl Bubo Allavena et al. 2006, Magrini et al. 2007). A bubo and Tengmalm’s Owl Aegolius funereus are national coordination for the Lanner Falcon was monitored only on a local scale, while Buzzard Buteo established in the 2003–2004 breeding seasons to buteo and Kestrel F. tinnunculus are monitored within acquire relevant information for the Italian action the framework of the national common bird census plan (Andreotti & Leonardi 2007, Andreotti et al. project to evaluate the breeding population trends 2008). In the Alps, a network for vulture monitoring (Progetto Mito; Rete Rurale Nazionale & LIPU was promoted in 2008 by the Region, 2012). Stelvio National Park and Alpi Marittime Natural In the non-breeding period, Red and Black Kites Park (RIMANI project). Aims of this network are to are counted at night roosts (partial monitoring), while follow and study dynamic population of re-introduced Marsh Harrier is included in International Waterbird individuals of Lammergeier Gypaetus barbatus and to Census (IWC) (Baccetti et al. 2002). Among the observe and record other vulture species which are most numerous species in the migration periods are slowly colonizing the Alps (Griffon Vulture, Black Black Kite, Marsh Harrier, Short-toed Eagle and Vulture Aegypius monachus) or occasionally occurring Honey Buzzard Pernis apivoris. (Egyptian Vulture). There is informal national Monitoring is usually aimed at censusing coordination for monitoring the raptor migration populations or, as far as Endangered and Critically (Migrans project), supported by a group of people Endangered species are concerned, to assess their status depending on different organisations (NGOs, Parks). (e.g. Egyptian Vulture, Sara et al. 2009). However, The spatial coverage of monitoring depends on the data on threats to raptors are also gathered. The main species themselves. For some of them (e.g. Golden threats monitored by different projects are habitat loss, Eagle Aquila chrysaetos, Peregrine Falcon F. peregrinus, disturbance, illegal hunting, egg collecting and stealing Griffon Vulture), comprehensive monitoring is being of young falcons from their nests, poisoning, collisions implemented all over the country. In some areas, with aerial structures (wires, power lines, wind farms), monitoring projects have been carried out intensively both in the breeding areas and in bottlenecks where for many years (e.g. Fasce et al. 2011). In other parts migrants funnel. The effects of collisions with power of the country, the knowledge of raptor populations is lines were studied in details, and guidelines to mitigate 298 Acrocephalus 33 (154/155): 297−300, 2012

the impact have been written (Rubolini et al. 2005, Italy is to create a National Coordination aimed at Pirovano & Cocchi 2008). organizing a network of regional focal points and to An international networking might help to draw standardized species-specific protocols. Ideally, improve our knowledge on new coming threats whose the coordination for each species or species groups effects are not yet fully understood (e.g. wind farms). should be provided by public institutions such as the Furthermore, it might allow a better understanding Italian Ministry for the Environment, universities, of flyways especially relevant for the protection of museums or ISPRA to ensure adequate resources in stopover key sites. terms of economy and/or staff, temporal continuity, correct use of the data and to train regional focal Strengths and weaknesses points to guarantee a strict connection between local The main strength of the monitoring programmes observers and the national network. carried out in Italy is the high motivation and enthusiasm of several ornithologists working in the Povzetek field, in most cases on a voluntary basis. The qualitative level of field observers is generally high. V Italiji manjkajo celostni popisi in monitoringi The weaknesses are the lack of a national populacij ptic roparic na nacionalni ravni. Da bi lahko coordination and the low level of communication uresničili mednarodne projekte, ki zadevajo brkatega among a part of ornithologists, who are scarcely sera Gypaetus barbatus, beloglavega jastreba Gyps inclined to co-operate and share their own data with fulvus, kačarja Circaetus gallicus, črnega Milvus migrans others for several reasons (e.g. fear to expose nests in rjavega škarnika M. milvus, je bilo vzpostavljeno to robbery, jealousy, distrust). Lack of economic sodelovanje z nekaterimi tujimi državami (Švica, resources from various institutions is also a major Avstrija, Francija, Španija). S strani različnih limiting factor. nevladnih organizacij je bilo zastavljenih nekaj Studies and monitoring of owl populations are regionalnih in lokalnih projektov monitoringa več vrst quite scarce. Some diurnal species are not adequately in dogovorjena neformalna nacionalna koordinacija monitored, in particular tree-nesting raptors (such za monitoring selečih se ujed. Namen monitoringa as the Goshawk, whose population is probably je navadno ugotoviti velikost populacij, pridobljene underestimated in remote areas due to the harsh podatke pa različni deležniki uporabljajo v glavnem za census conditions). Some of the less covered areas are poročanje statusa vrst, zavarovanih v skladu Direktivo in (Calabria, and Sardinia), o pticah EU, načrtovanje zavarovanih območij, in spite of their richness in species of relevant upravljanje s prostorom, načrtovanje naravovarstvenih conservation importance; this lack of data is partially akcij in ocenjevanje vplivov nacionalnih in lokalnih related to the low number of active ornithologists and projektov. ringers there. About threats, the role of pesticides, rodenticides, References pollutants, chemical contaminants and collisions with wind farms is not adequately investigated and the Agostini, N. (2002): [The migration of birds of prey in relevance of their impacts on population trends is not Italy.] pp. 157–182 In: Brichetti, P. & Gariboldi, A. well known. (eds.): Manuale di Ornitologia. Vol. 3. – Edagricole - Il European monitoring network could facilitate Sole 24 Ore, Bologna. (in Italian) commencement of national programmes, at least for Agostini, N., Baghino, L., Coleiro, C., Corbi, F., & some species of diurnal raptors currently monitored by Premuda, G. (2002): Circuitous autumn migration in local ornithological groups. Furthermore, international the Short-toed Eagle (Circaetus gallicus). – Journal of Raptor Research 36 (2): 111–114. standardised protocols could improve the efficiency of Allavena, S., Andreotti, A., Angelini, J. & Scotti, monitoring in Italy, both to evaluate population sizes M. (2006): Proceedings of the Congress “Status and and trends and to assess the impact of some threats conservation of the Red Kite (Milvus milvus) and the (e.g. electrocution, windfarms). Special attention Black Kite (Milvus migrans) in Italy and southern should be paid to define guidelines for Before-After Europe”, 11–12 March 2006, Serra San Quirico, Italy. Control-Impacts monitoring within the framework of – Parco Naturale della Gola della Rossa e di Frasassi, Comunità Montana dell’Esino Frasassi & Altura. (in project evaluation and impact assessment. Italian) Andreotti, A. & Leonardi, G. (2007): [National Action Priorities, capacity-building Plan for the Lanner Falcon (Falco biarmicus feldeggii).] The highest priority to strengthen monitoring in Quaderni di Conservazione della Natura 24. – Ministero 299 A. Aradis & A. Andreotti: A preliminary overview of monitoring for raptors in Italy

dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare (in Italian) & Istituto nazionale per la fauna selvatica. (in Italian, Rete Rurale Nazionale & LIPU (2013): [Common English summary) birds in Italy. Updating population trends in 2012.] – Andreotti, A. & Leonardi, G. (2009): [National Action [http://www.reterurale.it/farmlandbirdindex] (in Italian, Plan for Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus).] English summary) Quaderni di Conservazione della Natura 30 – Ministero Rubolini, D., Gustin, M., Bogliani, G. & Garavaglia, dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare & R. (2005): Birds and powerlines in Italy: an assessment. – ISPRA. (in Italian, English summary) Bird Conservation International 15 (2): 131–145. Andreotti, A., Leonardi, G., Sarà, M., Brunelli, M., Sara, M., Greci, S. & Di Vittorio, M. (2009): Status of De Lisio, L., De Sanctis, A., Magrini, M., Nardi, Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus) in . – R., Perna, P. & Sigismondi, A. (2008): Landscape- Journal of Raptor Research 43 (1): 66–69. scale Spatial Distribution of the Lanner Falcon (Falco Schenk, h., Aresu, M. & Naitana, S. (2008): [Proposal for biarmicus feldeggii) breeding population in Italy. – Ambio an Action Plan for the Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus) in 37 (6): 440–444. Sardinia.] – Legambiente Sardegna, Cagliari. (in Italian) Aradis, A., Sarrocco, S. & Brunelli, M. (eds.) (2012): Spina, F. & Leonardi, G. (2007): [National Action Plan [Analysis of the status and distribution breeding birds of for the Eleonora’s falcon (Falco eleonorae).] – Quaderni prey in .] Quaderni Natura e Biodiversità 2/2012. di Conservazione della Natura 26. – Ministero – ISPRA & ARP, Lazio. (in Italian, English summary) dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare & Baccetti, N., Dall’antonia, P., Magagnoli, P., Melege, & Istituto nazionale per la fauna selvatica. (in Italian, L., Serra, L., Soldatini, C. & Zenatello, M. (2002): English summary) [Results of the censuses of wintering waterbirds in Italy: distribution, population estimates and trends in 1991– 2000.] – Biol. Cons. Fauna: 111: 1–240. (in Italian, Arrived / Prispelo: 27. 3. 2013 English summary) Accepted / Sprejeto: 1. 7. 2013 BirdLife International (2004): Birds in Europe: Population estimates, trends and conservation status. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 12. – BirdLife International, Cambridge. Brichetti, P. & Fracasso, G. (2003): [Ornitologia Italiana.] Vol. 1. Gaviidae–Falconidae. – Perdisa Editore, Bologna. (in Italian) Brichetti, P. & Fracasso, G. (2006): [Ornitologia Italiana.] Vol. 3. Stercorariidae–Caprimulgidae. – Perdisa Editore, Bologna. (in Italian) Brichetti, P., De Franceschi, P. & Baccetti, N. (eds.) (1992): [Fauna of Italy.] Vol. 29. Aves, Part I. – Calderini, Bologna. (in Italian). Fasce, P., Fasce, L., Villers, A., Bergese, F. & Bretagnolle, V. (2011): Long-term breeding demography and density dependence in an increasing population of Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos. – Ibis 153 (3): 581–591. IUCN (2012): The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2. – [www.iucnredlist.org], 27/5/2013. Magrini, M., Perna, P. & Scotti, M. (2007): Proceedings of the Congress “Golden Eagle, Lanner and Peregrine in peninsular Italy: status of knowledge and conservation problems”, 26–28 March 2004, Serra San Quirico, Italy. – Parco Naturale della Gola della Rossa e di Frasassi. (in Italian) Mellone, U., Limiñana, R., Mallìa, E. & Urios, V. (2011): Extremely detoured migration in an inexperienced bird: interplay of transport costs and social interactions. – Journal of Avian Biology 42 (5): 468–472. Panuccio, M. (2011): Wind Effects on Visible Raptor Migration in Spring at the , Southern Italy. – Journal of Raptor Research 45 (1): 88–92. Peronace, V., Cecere, J.G., Gustin, M. & Rondinini, C. (2012): [2011 Red List of breeding birds in Italy.] – Avocetta, 36: 11–58. (in Italian) Pirovano, A. & Cocchi, R. (2008): [Guidelines for mitigating the impact of power lines on birds.] – ISPRA. 300