On Refusal to Include Information in the State Register of Microfinance Organisations | Bank of Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

On Refusal to Include Information in the State Register of Microfinance Organisations | Bank of Russia

12 Neglinnaya Street, Moscow, 107016 Russia 8 800 300-30-00 www.cbr.ru News On refusal to include information in the state register of microfinance organisations 21 October 2015 Press release On 16 October 2015, Bank of Russia took the following decisions: to refuse to include information on the following entities in the state register of microfinance organisations: THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MICROFINANCE ORGANISATION MSB FINANCE (the city of Chelyabinsk); the Microfinance Organisation Renta Invest, limited liability company (the city of Chelyabinsk); the Microfinance Organisation CREDIT FINLIFE, limited liability company (the town of Kirsanov, Tambov Region); Credit Kopeyka, limited liability company (the city of Tomsk, Tomsk Region); VLADFINSERVICE, limited liability company (the town of Losino-Petrovsky, Moscow Region); Money Fairy, limited liability company (the city of Kyzyl, the Republic of Tuva); Financial Group, limited liability company (the town of Pavlovo, Nizhny Novgorod Region); Sodeystviye-M, limited liability company (the town of Valdai, Novgorod Region); Finance Group-A, limited liability company (the town of Arzamas, Nizhny Novgorod Region); the Microfinance Organisation Babylon — NSK, limited liability company (the city of Novosibirsk); the Microfinance Organisation Assignatsia, limited liability company (the city of Nizhny Novgorod); the Microfinance Organisation Mercury 5, limited liability company (the city of Chelyabinsk); Municipal Fund for the Support of Small Businesses of Klyavlino District Razvitiye (the railway station of Klyavlino, Klyavlino District, Samara Region); THE MICROFINANCE ORGANISATION RICH-STROY, limited liability company (the city of Grozny); the Microfinance Organisation Credit Resources, limited liability company (the town of Novokuznetsk, Kemerovo Region); the Microfinance Organisation ZAYM-NN, limited liability company (the city of Nizhny Novgorod); the Microfinance Organisation Doveritel, limited liability company (the village of Gorka Muravievskaya, Velsk District, Arkhangelsk Region); Alliance Capital, limited liability company (the city of Saransk, the Republic of Mordovia); Fortune, limited liability company (the town of Noyabrsk, Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Area). The reference to the Press Service is mandatory if you intend to use this material..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Download Article
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 333 Humanities and Social Sciences: Novations, Problems, Prospects (HSSNPP 2019) Impact of Agricultural Climatic Potential on Development of Regional Grain Market Generalov I. Suslov S. Economics and automation of business processes Economics and automation of business processes Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University Knyaginino, Russia Knyaginino, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Bazhenov R. Zavivaev S. Information systems, mathematics and legal informatics Technical and biological systems Sholom-Aleichem Priamursky State University Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University Birobidzhan, Russia Knyaginino, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Dolmatova O. Land management Omsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin Omsk, Russia [email protected] Abstract—The Nizhny Novgorod region is one of the leading turnover fall to the share of the Russian agrarian and industrial economically developed areas of the Russian Federation with high complex also confirms the need of its providing. potential for the development of agriculture. The purpose of the study is to assess the impact of agricultural climatic features on the In complex economic conditions of the Russian Federation, development of grain farming in the region. The article includes the control of various economic mechanisms moves to the the official data taken from the Nizhny Novgorod region forefront. The strategic need of development of competitive Territorial body of state statistics concerning indicators agriculture demands creation of the accurate system based on characterizing the amounts of grain sales. As a result, the main understanding of the needs of participants of the market and the features of grain sales are revealed within seven agricultural state.
[Show full text]
KB (Design Bureaux)
KB Page 1 Ver. 1.0 KB (Design Bureaux) 1. No. 2. Name 3. Subsidiary 4. Location 5. Branch 6. Ministry 7. Other details 8. Designer 9. Date 10. Source units 1 KB-1, ELEC MRP (1980) radar Kuksenko, 1980 C74 (pp. 466, 492-3) MRP Bunkin 1 KB-1, OAO ARMS VSNKh (1931) KB-1 of Orudiino-Arsenalnogo 1931 G13 Ob"edineniya 1 KB ARMS NKAP (1940) bomb and torpedo for aircraft Shul'gin 1940 G26 1 KB-1, Moscow AERO MV (1950), formed 1950 from SB-1; Moscow air Kuksenko1950- 1950-97 A7 C33 (p. 236) D39 (3/2/93) D25 Tret'e MSM (1953), defence missile systems p/ya 1323; MV 3, ( S.L. Beriya (30/7/94, 24/5/97) C28 (p. 294) D35 Glavnoe MRP (1965) till 1953 when transferred to eng.1950-3), (vol. 1/97, p. 3, N3/97, p. 68) G1 Upravlenie Minsredmash and shortly after to MOP; Yelyan 1953, D63 (22-25/8/97) 11/53 OKB-2 split off (later MKB Fakel); Vladimirskii three separate SKBs split off c1955 1953?, Lukin SKBs-30,31 & 41; became TsKB(MKB) 1954, Chisov 'Strela' & from 1967 TsKB 'Almaz' and 1954-?, now NPO TsKB 'Almaz' Rapletin 1953- 67, Bunkin 1967– 1 KB-1 z-da Moscow OTHER VSNKh (1930) gas warfare equipment 1930 A2 1 Glavkhim 1 KB-1 z-da Moscow AERO VSNKh (1932), based at z-d 1 and joined in 2/39 by Kocherign 1932- 1932-41 C24 C4 E2 G26 1 GUAP (Khodynka) NKTP (1933), OKB of Polikarpov and from mid-1939 41 NKOP (1936), OKO-1 of Mikoyan, which became OKB NKAP (1939) z-da 1 in 12/39; Kocherigin evacuated to Novosibirsk to join Polikarpov in 10/41; source G26 has Kocherigin OKB sent to z-d 156 2/39 1 KB OKB z- Khimki AERO created in reorganization within OKB in 1959-62 D7 (N11-2/96, pp.
[Show full text]
Peasants “On the Run”: State Control, Fugitives, Social and Geographic Mobility in Imperial Russia, 1649-1796
PEASANTS “ON THE RUN”: STATE CONTROL, FUGITIVES, SOCIAL AND GEOGRAPHIC MOBILITY IN IMPERIAL RUSSIA, 1649-1796 A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrey Gornostaev, M.A. Washington, DC May 7, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Andrey Gornostaev All Rights Reserved ii PEASANTS “ON THE RUN”: STATE CONTROL, FUGITIVES, SOCIAL AND GEOGRAPHIC MOBILITY IN IMPERIAL RUSSIA, 1649-1796 Andrey Gornostaev, M.A. Thesis Advisers: James Collins, Ph.D. and Catherine Evtuhov, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the issue of fugitive peasants by focusing primarily on the Volga-Urals region of Russia and situating it within the broader imperial population policy between 1649 and 1796. In the Law Code of 1649, Russia definitively bound peasants of all ranks to their official places of residence to facilitate tax collection and provide a workforce for the nobility serving in the army. In the ensuing century and a half, the government introduced new censuses, internal passports, and monetary fines; dispatched investigative commissions; and coerced provincial authorities and residents into surveilling and policing outsiders. Despite these legislative measures and enforcement mechanisms, many thousands of peasants left their localities in search of jobs, opportunities, and places to settle. While many fugitives toiled as barge haulers, factory workers, and agriculturalists, some turned to brigandage and river piracy. Others employed deception or forged passports to concoct fictitious identities, register themselves in villages and towns, and negotiate their status within the existing social structure.
[Show full text]
Nick Fielding
Travellers in the Great Steppe FROM THE PAPAL ENVOYS TO THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION NICK FIELDING “In writing this book I have tried to explain some of the historical events that have affected those living in the Great Steppe – not an easy task, as there is little study of this subject in the English language. And the disputes between the Russians and their neighbours and between the Bashkirs, the Kazakhs, the Turkomans, the Kyrgyz and the Kalmyks – not to mention the Djungars, the Dungans, the Nogai, the Mongols, the Uighurs and countless others – means that this is not a subject for the faint-hearted. Nonetheless, I hope that the writings referred to in this book have been put into the right historical context. The reasons why outsiders travelled to the Great Steppe varied over time and in themselves provide a different kind of history. Some of these travellers, particularly the women, have been forgotten by modern readers. Hopefully this book will stimulate you the reader to track down some of the long- forgotten classics mentioned within. Personally, I do not think the steppe culture described so vividly by travellers in these pages will ever fully disappear. The steppe is truly vast and can swallow whole cities with ease. Landscape has a close relationship with culture – and the former usually dominates the latter. Whatever happens, it will be many years before the Great Steppe finally gives up all its secrets. This book aims to provide just a glimpse of some of them.” From the author’s introduction. TRAVELLERS IN THE GREAT STEPPE For my fair Rosamund TRAVELLERS IN THE GREAT STEPPE From the Papal Envoys to the Russian Revolution NICK FIELDING SIGNAL BOOKS .
[Show full text]
REMINISCENSES of RUSSIA Irvin R
REMINISCENSES OF RUSSIA Irvin R. (Irv) Lindemuth June 2017 “It is easy to blow up our planet. All it takes is a button to be pressed …,” Russian school children’s song. “After so many years of very bad relations between our countries, this work is extraordinary...I wish you further success," Yuli B. Khariton, September 1993. “All of you can be sure your children and grandchildren will be proud and this is the beginning...,” Yuri Trutnev, September 1993. The words above by Yu. B. Khariton, founder of the Soviet nuclear weapons program and Chief Scientist of the All-Russian Scientific Research Center of Experimental Physics (VNIIEF) in Sarov, were spoken to a Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) team after the completion of the first joint fundamental scientific experiment conducted at VNIIEF with LANL. Trutnev, Deputy Chief Scientist of VNIIEF and a colleague of Nobel Peace Laureate Andre Sakharov, added his comments at a banquet celebrating the same experiment. Khariton was absolutely right: the budding LANL/VNIIEF collaboration was extraordinary and it was unprecedented in the nuclear age. Trutnev was absolutely right, too: it was just the beginning, and his words imply the hopes of all of those who have participated in the collaboration: that our children and grandchildren will live in a world free of the international tensions and fear of nuclear war that put a cloud over his and my generation. For the author and most, if not all, of the LANL members of the collaboration, the opportunity to participate in the collaboration was one of the highlights of their careers.
[Show full text]
City Abakan Achinsk Almetyevsk Anapa Arkhangelsk Armavir Artem Arzamas Astrakhan Balakovo Barnaul Bataysk Belaya Kholunitsa Belg
City Moscow Abakan Achinsk Almetyevsk Anapa Arkhangelsk Armavir Artem Arzamas Astrakhan Balakovo Barnaul Bataysk Belaya Kholunitsa Belgorod Berdsk Berezniki Biysk Blagoveshensk Bor Bolshoi Kamen Bratsk Bryansk Cheboksary Chelyabinsk Cherepovets Cherkessk Chita Chuvashiya Region Derbent Dimitrovgrad Dobryanka Ekaterinburg Elets Elista Engels Essentuki Gelendzhik Gorno-Altaysk Grozny Gubkin Irkutsk Ivanovo Izhevsk Kaliningrad Kaluga Kamensk-Uralsky Kamyshin Kaspiysk Kazan - Innopolis Kazan - metro Kazan - over-ground Kemerovo Khabarovsk Khanty-Mansiysk Khasavyurt Kholmsk Kirov Kislovodsk Komsomolsk-na- Amure Kopeysk Kostroma Kovrov Krasnodar Krasnoyarsk area Kurgan Kursk Kyzyl Labytnangi Lipetsk Luga Makhachkala Magadan Magnitogorsk Maykop Miass Michurinsk Morshansk Moscow Airport Express Moscow area (74 live cities) Aprelevka Balashikha Belozerskiy Bronnitsy Vereya Vidnoe Volokolamsk Voskresensk Vysokovsk Golitsyno Dedovsk Dzerzhinskiy Dmitrov Dolgprudny Domodedovo Drezna Dubna Egoryevsk Zhukovskiy Zaraysk Zvenigorod Ivanteevka Istra Kashira Klin Kolomna Korolev Kotelniki Krasnoarmeysk Krasnogorsk Krasnozavodsk Krasnoznamensk Kubinka Kurovskoe Lokino-Dulevo Lobnya Losino-Petrovskiy Lukhovitsy Lytkarino Lyubertsy Mozhaysk Mytischi Naro-Fominsk Noginsk Odintsovo Ozery Orekhovo-Zuevo Pavlovsky-Posad Peresvet Podolsk Protvino Pushkino Pushchino Ramenskoe Reutov Roshal Ruza Sergiev Posad Serpukhov Solnechnogorsk Old Kupavna Stupino Taldom Fryazino Khimki Khotkovo Chernogolovka Chekhov Shatura Schelkovo Elektrogorsk Elektrostal Elektrougli Yakhroma
[Show full text]
Investment Potential of the Nizhny Novgorod Region Kulebaki Urban District Overview
Investment potential of the Nizhny Novgorod region Kulebaki Urban District Overview Nizhny 17,08 sq. km Novgorod area of the administrative 938.89 sq. km centre District area 32 076 people 180 km live in the administrative centre 47 619 people Administrative 27 Population towns and settlements centre - Kulebaki District accessibility by automobile and railway transport: 3 hours Closest railway stations: Navashino (30 km), Mukhtolovo (14 km away from the Gremyachevo village) Number of municipal bus services – 17, incl. town bus services – 11, 2,5 - 3 hours suburban bus services – 6 Direct automobile connection with Moscow (350 km) Socio-Economic Indicators Investment Salary Product shipment 6.1 % Оthers 2 297.9 2 500 30 000 25 013.5 1.2 % 23 270.2 Production and distribution 2 000 1 789.9 25 000 19 808 20 975.3 of power, gas and water 1 412.6 1 980.2 1 438.4 20 000 1 500 1 258.2 1 676 8.2 % 15 000 Commerce 1 000 1 326 1 334.4 1 057.9 10 000 0.7 % 500 5 000 Transport and communications 0.4 % 0 0 Agriculture 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2015 2016 2017 2018 0.4 % Construction small- + medium-sized businesses, RUB million RUB large-sized businesses, RUB million 82.4 % Manufacturing Natural Resources Agriculture 10 020 ha 70 757 ha Agricultural land Forest land area 4 799 ha 1 581 ha 3 166 ha 1 627 ha 23 313 ha 42 777 ha Tillable land Cultivated area Hayﬁelds Pasture land Protection forests Commercial forests (Group 1) (Group 2) Mineral resources 115 442 1 508 2 032 849 4 667 thousand m³ thousand m³ thousand m³ thousand m³ thousand tonnes Carbonate
[Show full text]
Resolution # 784 of the Government of the Russian Federation Dated July
Resolution # 784 of the Government of the Russian Federation dated July 17, 1998 On the List of Joint-Stock Companies Producing Goods (Products, Services) of Strategic Importance for Safeguarding National Security of the State with Federally-Owned Shares Not to Be Sold Ahead of Schedule (Incorporates changes and additions of August 7, August 14, October 31, November 14, December 18, 1998; February 27, August 30, September 3, September 9, October 16, December 31, 1999; March 16, October 19, 2001; and May 15, 2002) In connection with the Federal Law “On Privatization of State Property and Fundamental Principles of Privatizing Municipal Property in the Russian Federation”, and in accordance with paragraph 1 of Decree # 478 of the President of the Russian Federation dated May 11, 1995 “On Measures to Guarantee the Accommodation of Privatization Revenues in thee Federal Budget” (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 1995, # 20, page 1776; 1996, # 39, page 4531; 1997, # 5, page 658; # 20, page 2240), the Government of the Russian Federation has resolved: 1. To adopt the List of Joint-Stock Companies Producing Goods (Products, Services) of Strategic Importance for Safeguarding National Security of the State with Federally-Owned Shares Not to Be Sold Ahead of Schedule (attached). In accordance with Decree # 1514 of the President of the Russian Federation dated December 21, 2001, pending the adoption by the President of the Russian Federation in concordance with Article 6 of the Federal Law “On Privatization of State and Municipal Property” of lists of strategic enterprises and strategic joint-stock companies, changes and additions to the list of joint-stock companies adopted by this Resolution shall bee introduced by Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation issued on the basis of Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation.
[Show full text]
Los Alamos and Arzamas-16: the “Sister Cities” Relationship
“Side-by-Side as Equals”—a round table Los Alamos and Arzamas-16: the “Sister Cities” Relationship he two cities of Arzamas-16 and of the two cities. In December of 1993, some two-hundred Los Alamos Los Alamos are situated on op- 1993, Lindemuth made a presentation students contributed artwork to a Tposite sides of the globe, sepa- to the Los Alamos City Council that Bradbury-Science-Museum-sponsored rated by ten time zones, and once sepa- told the history of Arzamas-16. He ex- “Friendship Book” on the theme of rated by Cold War secrecy and politics. plained the similarities between the two peaceful relations between the two na- Each is a nuclear tions, a book that in weapons research city January 1994 was pre- and the birthplace of sented to Arzamas-16 its country's atomic Director Vladimir bomb. Moreover, Belugin. each began its exis- The pen-pals rela- tence as a secret city. tionship spread to As the people of Gallup, NM when Arzamas-16 and Los scientists from Arza- Alamos came to know mas -16 came to New each other over the Mexico in November last several years, 1993 for a joint experi- the recognition of mental campaign in similar histories, na- Los Alamos’ Ancho tional security mis- Canyon. During a side sions, and educational, trip to the Grand family, and patriotic Canyon, Jim Goforth, values led the two a member of the communities to reach pulsed-power group, out to each other and In February 1995, the administration of Arzamas-16 presented the Los Alamos and his sister, Marge begin to share a City Council with a traditional Russian-cast brass bell.
[Show full text]
Npr 6.4: Stewards and Custodians: Tomorrow's Crisis for the Russian Nuclear Weapons Complex?
Oleg Bukharin STEWARDS AND CUSTODIANS: TOMORROW’S CRISIS FOR THE RUSSIAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS COMPLEX? by Oleg Bukharin Oleg Bukharin is a Research Staff Member at Princeton University’s Center for Energy and Environmental Studies. or years to come, the Russian nuclear weapons an absence of new high-quality hires could disrupt the production complex will remain responsible for continuity of Russia’s nuclear weapons competence, Fmissions that are central to international security undermine stability of the complex, and, eventually, and nonproliferation, including: jeopardize its core missions. • dismantlement of retired nuclear weapons; The nonproliferation implications could be serious. • support to Russia’s operational nuclear warhead Instability in the complex would heighten the danger of stockpile to assure its safety, security, and reliability; proliferation of nuclear materials, expertise, and tech- • safe and secure storage, management, and disposi- nologies. The safety and security of nuclear weapons tion of hundreds of tons of fissile materials; and could suffer. Efforts to dismantle obsolete warheads • support to Russian and international arms control and dispose of resulting fissile materials could be stalled. and nonproliferation efforts. Decreased confidence in stockpile reliability would in- These missions cannot be accomplished without a crease pressure in Russia to resume full-scale nuclear cadre of qualified workers, scientists, engineers, and testing and, thus, undermine the Comprehensive Test managers with skills and knowledge in the following Ban Treaty (CTBT) regime. And a shortage of qualified two overlapping but distinct areas: (a) nuclear weapons technical experts could complicate negotiation and and fissile material management, and (b) nuclear mate- implementation of warhead transparency and other arms rial protection, control, and accounting (MPC&A).
[Show full text]
Transparency in Nuclear Warheads and Materials
9. The changing Russian and US nuclear weapon complexes: challenges for transparency Oleg Bukharin I. Introduction Russian and US technical experts are working to develop technological and pro- cedural approaches to the monitoring of nuclear warhead dismantlement in the event that Russia and the United States reach an agreement calling for such a transparency regime. In order to be negotiated and implemented at nuclear weapon facilities, a transparency regime must be designed to have minimal impact on facility operations and the financial burden of inspections as well as to protect sensitive nuclear weapon information. Furthermore, a regime must take into account the considerable differences that exist between Russia and the USA in the structure and organization of their nuclear warhead production complexes and operations. Sections II and III of this chapter present an overview of the post-cold war warhead production complexes of the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy (Minatom) and the US Department of Energy (DOE) and briefly describe their warhead dismantlement processes. Sections IV–VI address some of the opera- tional, technical, political and perceptional problems of implementing warhead dismantlement transparency in Russia and the USA and outline steps that could be taken by the two states. II. Russia’s nuclear weapon complex and warhead dismantlement operations Minatom’s warhead production complex comprises 17 research institutes and production facilities (table 9.1). Six facilities participate in warhead dismantle- ment operations
[Show full text]
Investment Potential of the Nizhny Novgorod Region Sarov Urban District Overview
Investment potential of the Nizhny Novgorod region Sarov Urban District Overview 3,5 hours 2,5 hours 232,4 km2 95 469 people Area Population Nizhny Novgorod 76 km to Arzamas, 120 km to Vyksa, 20 km to Diveevo, 77 km to Pervomaysk 190 km to the Strigino International Airport in Nizhny Novgorod 190 km 190 km to the airport in Saransk Railway connection with Moscow Sarov Socio-Economic Indicators Investment Product shipment Salary RUB million RUB million RUB 14000 13 292.3 60000 55000 54 812.9 50 095 46 922 12000 10 990.8 43 923 48000 45 841.2 44 674.9 44000 40 787 10000 9 271.1 39 759.5 41 469.5 37 876 7 666.3 36000 33000 8000 7 148.8 6000 24000 22000 4000 12000 11000 2000 0 0 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Social Infrastructure Hotels: Education: – Sarov hotel – Sarov private primary school –Center 300 hotel – Sarov Orthodox Gymnasium named after St. Seraphim of Sarov – Zelyonaya hotel by the Nizhny Novgorod Eparchy of the Russian Orthodox Church – Slavyanskaya hotel – VECTOR++ informatics school – Satis hotel – Librika academy – Tsentralnaya hotel – LANGUAGE BRIDGE language school – Vizit hotel – Bruel hotel Vocational education: – Rechnoy motel – Sarov Polytechnic College named after the Twice Hero of the Socialist Labour Boris Muzrukov Entertainment facilities: – Sarov Medical College of the Federal Medical-Biological – Sarov Drama Theatre Agency of Russia – Town museum – Art gallery Higher education: – Folk Toy Museum – Sarov State Physics Technical Institute, National Research – Military History Museum Nuclear University MEPhI branch – Russian Icon Gallery Culture Main sights: Monastery of the Holy Dormition Zosima and Sabbatius Church of the Holy Glorious Prophet, Sarov Drama Theatre.
[Show full text]