TE PIMS 4183 Mbe River Gabon 180321 FINAL.PDF

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TE PIMS 4183 Mbe River Gabon 180321 FINAL.PDF PROJECT TERMINAL EVALUATION “SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF THE MBÉ RIVER FORESTED WATERSHED THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PAYMENTS FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES (PES) MECHANISM” UNDP PIMS 4183 GEF ID 3761 GEF FOCAL AREA: BIODIVERSITY STRATEGIC PROGRAM OF GEF 4: BD SO1-SP3 ‘STRENGTHENING NETWORKS OF TERRESTRIAL PAS’ IMPLEMENTING PARTNER: MINISTRY OF FORESTS, SEA AND ENVIRONMENT (EX MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, NATURE PROTECTION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT) / DIRECTION OF ENVIRONMENT REGION: AFRICA COUNTRY: GABON EvaluatioN coNducted by Dr DomiNique ROBY from 23 November to 4 December 2017 Report submitted 20 February 2018 FiNal versioN submitted on 20 March 2018 Mbé River Project PIMS 4183 TE – final version i AcknowleDgements The coNsultaNt would like to siNcerely thaNk the UNDP GaboN CouNtry Office for their kiNd receptioN and support in allowiNg the missioN to take place iN the best coNditioNs. Mrs. FraNca Cossu is especially thaNked for her amicable support throughout the missioN and for the meetiNgs iN Libreville aNd iN the field. Staff of the CoordiNatioN UNit aNd the offices of WCS and TNC are also thanked for shariNg their experieNce iN the project aNd for their support iN orgaNiziNg the field missioN. The collectioN of iNformatioN for this evaluatioN required the collaboratioN of people who kiNdly agreed to take the time to meet us aNd share their experieNce, opiNioNs aNd aNalysis oN the implemeNtatioN of this project. The author of this report wishes to thaNk them siNcerely. However, recogNitioN of their coNtributioN does Not biNd aNyoNe to aNy statemeNt in this report, apart from the author. Mbé River Project PIMS 4183 TE – final version ii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. VI 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 STRUCTURE OF THE EVALUATION REPORT ........................................................................................................................ 2 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ......................................................................................... 2 2.1 PROJECT START AND DURATION .................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 PROBLEMS THAT THE PROJECT SOUGHT TO ADDRESS: TARGETED THREATS AND BARRIERS ............................................................. 2 2.3 IMMEDIATE AND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT / EXPECTED RESULTS .................................................................... 3 2.4 BASELINE INDICATORS ESTABLISHED ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.5 TIMELINE OF PROJECT PREPARATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................................ 4 2.6 MAIN STAKEHOLDERS ................................................................................................................................................ 5 3 FINDINGS .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 PROJECT DESIGN / FORMULATION ................................................................................................................................ 6 3.1.1 Analysis of LFA/Results Framework ............................................................................................................... 6 Results Framework / Logframe .............................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.2 Assumptions and Risks ................................................................................................................................ 11 3.1.3 Lessons from other relevant projects (e.g., same focal area) incorporated into project design ...................... 13 3.1.4 Planned stakeholder participation ............................................................................................................... 13 3.1.5 Replication approach .................................................................................................................................. 14 3.1.6 UNDP’s comparative advantage .................................................................................................................. 14 3.1.7 Linkages between project and other interventions within the sector ............................................................ 14 3.1.8 Management arrangements ....................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2.1 Adaptive management and feedback from M&E activities ........................................................................... 16 3.2.2 Partnership arrangements .......................................................................................................................... 16 3.2.3 Mobilization of stakeholders ....................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.4 Communication........................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.5 Project Finance ........................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.6 Monitoring and evaluation: design at entry, implementation, and overall assessment ................................. 19 3.2.7 Implementing Agency (UNDP) execution (*) and Executing Agency execution (*), overall project implementation/ execution (*), coordination, and operational issues ................................................................... 20 3.3 PROJECT RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................... 22 3.3.1 Overall results (attainment of objectives and outcomes) (Refer to Annex 8 for the TE rating scales) ............. 22 3.3.2 Relevance ................................................................................................................................................... 28 3.3.3 Effectiveness ............................................................................................................................................... 28 3.3.4 Efficiency .................................................................................................................................................... 28 3.3.5 Country ownership ...................................................................................................................................... 29 3.3.6 Mainstreaming ........................................................................................................................................... 29 3.3.7 Sustainability .......................................................................................................................................... 30 3.3.9 Impact .................................................................................................................................................... 31 4 CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND LESSONS .......................................................................................... 31 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 31 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 33 LESSONS .................................................................................................................................................................... 34 5 ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................................................ 36 Mbé River Project PIMS 4183 TE – final version iii ANNEX 1. TERMINAL EVALUATION TERMS OF REFERENCE (WITHOUT ANNEXES) ......................................................... 37 ANNEX 2 – SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS FOR THE TE OF THE PROJECT PIMS 4183......................................................... 42 ANNEX 3 – ITINERARY AND PURPOSE OF FIELD VISITS ................................................................................................ 43 ANNEX 4. LIST OF PERSONS INTERVIEWED ................................................................................................................ 44 ANNEX 5. ASSESSMENT MATRIX FOR EVALUATION. QUESTIONS TO GUIDE INTERVIEWS WITH PROJECT TEAM AND PARTNERS ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT ISSUES
Recommended publications
  • Rapport Du Groupe De Travail De La Commission Africaine Sur Les Populations / Communautés Autochtones
    REPORT OF THE AFRICAN for Indigenous Affairs Indigenous for International Work Group Group Work International COMMISSION’S WORKING GROUP ON INDIGENOUS POPULATIONS/COMMUNITIES N O RESEARCH AND INFORMATION VISIT TO et des Peuples des et des Droits de l’Homme l’Homme de Droits des THE REPUBLIC OF GABON Commission Africaine Africaine Commission 15-30 September 2007 REPUBLIC OF GAB REPUBLIQUE DU GAB 15-30 Septembre 2007 Septembre 15-30 EN REPUBLIQUE DU GABON DU REPUBLIQUE EN African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights VISITE DE RECHERCHE ET D’INFORMATION D’INFORMATION ET RECHERCHE DE VISITE O N COMMUNAUTÉS AUTOCHTONES COMMUNAUTÉS SUR LES POPULATIONS / / POPULATIONS LES SUR International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs DE LA COMMISSION AFRICAINE AFRICAINE COMMISSION LA DE RAPPORT DU GROUPE DE TRAVAIL DE GROUPE DU RAPPORT RAPPORT DU GROUPE DE TRAVAIL DE LA COMMISSION AFRICAINE SUR LES POPULATIONS / COMMUNAUTÉS AUTOCHTONES VISITE DE RECHERCHE ET D’INFORMATION EN REPUBLIQUE DU GABON 15-30 Septembre 2007 La Commission africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples a pris note de ce rapport lors de sa 45ème session ordinaire, 13-27 mai 2009 Commission Africaine des Droits International Work Group de l’Homme et des Peuples for Indigenous Affairs (CADHP) 2010 RAPPORT DU GROUPE DE TRAVAIL DE LA COMMISSION AFRICAINE SUR LES POPULATIONS / COMMUNAUTÉS AUTOCHTONES VISITE DE RECHERCHE ET D’INFORMATION EN REPUBLIQUE DU GABON 15– 30 Septembre 2007 © Copyright: CADHP et IWGIA Mise en page: Jorge Monrás Imprimerie: Eks-Skolens Trykkeri, Copenhague, Danemark ISBN: 978-87-91563-74-4 Distribution en Amerique du Nord: Transaction Publishers 300 McGaw Drive Raritan Center - Edison, NJ 08857 www.transactionpub.com COMMISSION AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE L’HoMME ET DES PEUPLES (CADHP) No 31 Bijilo Annex Layout Kombo North District, Western Region B.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan De Développement Stratégique De La Fenatag - 2018-2022
    RÉPUBLIQUE DU GABON FÉDÉRATION NATIONALE DES TRANSFORMATEURS DES PRODUITS AGRICOLES DU GABON PLAN DE DÉVELOPPEMENT STRATÉGIQUE DE LA FENATAG - 2018-2022 RÉPUBLIQUE DU GABON FÉDÉRATION NATIONALE DES TRANSFORMATEURS DES PRODUITS AGRICOLES DU GABON PLAN DE DÉVELOPPEMENT STRATÉGIQUE DE LA FENATAG - 2018-2022 Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture Libreville, 2018 3 Les appellations employées dans ce produit d’information et la présentation des données qui y figurent n’impliquent de la part de l’Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture (FAO) aucune prise de position quant au statut juridique ou au stade de développement des pays, territoires, villes ou zones ou de leurs autorités, ni quant au tracé de leurs frontières ou limites. La mention de sociétés déterminées ou de produits de fabricants, qu’ils soient ou non brevetés, n’entraîne, de la part de la FAO, aucune approbation ou recommandation desdits produits de préférence à d’autres de nature analogue qui ne sont pas cités. Les opinions exprimées dans ce produit d’information sont celles du/des auteur(s) et ne reflètent pas nécessairement les vues ou les politiques de la FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-130772-4 © FAO, 2018 La FAO encourage l’utilisation, la reproduction et la diffusion des informations figurant dans ce produit d’information. Sauf indication contraire, le contenu peut être copié, téléchargé et imprimé aux fins d’étude privée, de recherches ou d’enseignement, ainsi que pour utilisation dans des produits ou services non commerciaux, sous réserve que la FAO soit correctement mentionnée comme source et comme titulaire du droit d’auteur et à condition qu’il ne soit sous-en - tendu en aucune manière que la FAO approuverait les opinions, produits ou services des utilisateurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Njutapvoui Fokouop Rapport M2
    RÉGIMES DES PRÉCIPITATIONS ET RELATIONS PLUIES-NIVEAUX D’EAU-DÉBITS DANS LE BASSIN VERSANT DU KOMO (GABON) International Chair in Mathematical Physics and Applications. (ICMPA-UNESCO Chair) Master of Science in Physical Oceanography and Applications. Présenté par : NJUTAPVOUI FOKOUOP Nourdi Faculté des Sciences et Techniques (FAST) Université d’Abomey-Calavi (UAC) Cotonou, République du Bénin © CIPMA Publishing 2016 Université d’Abomey-Calavi (UAC), BENIN Faculté des Sciences et Techniques (FAST) Chaire Internationale en Physique Mathématique et Applications CIPMA-Chaire UNESCO ) M.Sc No .......... M.Sc/CIPMA/FAST/UAC/2017. RÉGIMES DES PRÉCIPITATIONS ET RELATIONS PLUIES-NIVEAUX D’EAU-DÉBITS DANS LE BASSIN VERSANT DU KOMO (GABON) Mémoire de Master of Science En Océanographie Physique et Applications Présenté par : NJUTAPVOUI FOKOUOP Nourdi Superviseurs : Dr. Alexis Chaigneau (IRD/LEGOS) Dr.Jean-Pierre Lefebvre (IRD/LEGOS) Jury : Président : ............................ Examinateur : ......................... Rapporteur : .......................... Cotonou, Rép. du Bénin, septembre 2017 Dédicaces i Dédicaces À mon défunt père Ngougoue Adamou Imam de la Mosqué Centrale de Kouoptamo. Régimes des précipitations et relations pluies-niveau d’eau-débits dans le bassin versant Komo (Gabon). NJUTAPVOUI FOKOUOP Nourdi ? CIPMA@2017 Remerciements ii Remerciements Tout d’abord je tiens à rendre grâce à ALLAH, détenteur de toute science pour m’avoir donné la force et le courage d’accomplir ce travail. Ce travail a également été réalisé, grâce aux conseils et à l’aide de beaucoup des personnes, leurs soutiens moraux, pédagogiques et matériels. C’est donc une grande joie de remercier : Dr Alexis CHAIGNEAU, et Dr Jean-Pierre lefebvre pour leurs encadrements et leurs idées qui m’ont permis de prendre en main mon projet de stage.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Monte Alén-Monts De Cristal Landscape
    12. Monte Alén-Monts de Cristal Landscape Figure 12.1. Map of Monte Alén-Monts de Cristal Landscape (Sources: CARPE, JRC, SRTM, WCS-Gabon). Location and area he Monte Alén-Monts de Cristal Landscape Th e Landscape in brief Tcovers the south and southeast of Equatorial Guinea and the northwest of Gabon (Figure 12.1). Coordinates: 1°53’35’’N – 0°5’38’’N; 9°37’2’’E – 11°36’3’’E It has an area of approximately 26,747 km2, of Area: 26,747 km2 which about half is located in Equatorial Guinea Elevation: 300-1,250 m and half in Gabon. In Equatorial Guinea, it in- Terrestrial ecoregion: Atlantic Congolese forests ecoregion cludes the Monte Alén and Altos de Nsork na- Aquatic ecoregions: Central West equatorial coastal ecoregion tional parks, as well as the Rio Muni Estuary Southwest equatorial coastal ecoregion Reserve and the Piedra Nzas Natural Monument. Protected areas: In Gabon, it comprises the two sections of Monts Monte Alén National Park, 200,000 ha, 1988/2000, Equatorial Guinea de Cristal National Park. Altos de Nsork National Park, 40,000 ha, 2000, Equatorial Guinea Monts de Cristal National Park, 120,000 ha, 2002, Gabon Physical environment Rio Muni Estuary Reserve, 70,000 ha, 2000, Equatorial Guinea Piedra Nzas Natural Monument, 19,000 ha, 2000, Equatorial Guinea Relief and altitude Th e Landscape occupies a rugged area of pla- teaus and mountain chains mainly situated at an altitude of 300 m to 650 m to the northeast of the coastal sedimentary basin of Gabon (Figure 12.2). In Equatorial Guinea, the highest peak is formed by Monte Mitra, which rises to 1,250 m and is 114 the culminating point of the Niefang chain which runs from the southwest to the northeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Socio-Économique - Ngounié 2012
    1 SITUATION SOCIO-ÉCONOMIQUE - NGOUNIÉ 2012 NGOUNIÉ 2013.indd 1 25/06/14 12:41 2 SITUATION SOCIO-ÉCONOMIQUE - NGOUNIÉ 2012 NGOUNIÉ 2013.indd 2 25/06/14 12:41 AVANT-PROPOS 9 INTRODUCTION 11 SOMMAIRE Partie I : CONNAITRE LA PROVINCE 13 I.1. LA TERRE ET LES HOMMES 15 I.1.1. La situation géographique 15 I.1.2. La géographie physique 15 I.1.3. Le découpage administratif 17 I.1.4. La géographie humaine 18 I.2. L’HISTOIRE ET LA CULTURE 19 I.2.1. Bref rappel historique 19 I.2.2. Les religions et les rites traditionnels 20 I.2.3. Les groupes linguistiques 21 I.2.4. Les légendes et mythes de la province 21 Partie II : INFORMATIONS SOCIALES 25 II.1. LA SANTE 27 II.1.1. Les infrastructures 27 II.1.2. Le personnel 28 II.1.3. Les activités de santé maternelle et infantile 29 II.2. L’EDUCATION 31 II.2.1. L’enseignement pré-primaire 31 II.2.2. L’enseignement primaire 32 II.2.3. L’enseignement secondaire général 32 II.2.4. L’enseignement secondaire technique et professionnel 33 II.3. L’EMPLOI 35 II.3.1. L’emploi dans le secteur privé 35 II.3.2. L’emploi dans le secteur public 35 III-INFORMATIONS ECONOMIQUES 39 3 SITUATION SOCIO-ÉCONOMIQUE - NGOUNIÉ 2012 NGOUNIÉ 2013.indd 3 25/06/14 12:41 III.1. LA FORET ET LES INDUSTRIES DU BOIS 41 III.2. LES INDUSTRIES AGRO ALIMENTAIRES 42 III.3. L’AGRICULTURE, L’ELEVAGE LA PECHE ET LA CHASSE SOMMAIRE 43 III.3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Serpentes: Colubridae: Grayia Ornata) in the Massif Du Chaillu, Gabon
    Hamadryad Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 136 – 141, 2002. Copyright 2002 Centre for Herpetology, Madras Crocodile Bank Trust. ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE DIBOMINA (SERPENTES: COLUBRIDAE: GRAYIA ORNATA) IN THE MASSIF DU CHAILLU, GABON Olivier S.G. Pauwels1, André Kamdem Toham2 and Victor Mamonekene3 1Department of Recent Vertebrates, Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Rue Vautier 29, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. Email: [email protected] 2WWF, Central African Regional Program Office, B.P. 9144, Libreville, Gabon. Email: [email protected] 3Institut de Développement Rural, Université Marien Ngouabi, B.P. 69, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT.– Interviews with local people and direct observations in seven villages in the Massif du Chaillu, central-southern Gabon, revealed various uses of Grayia ornata, including: food consumption; medicinal use for delivery problems, preventive care for newborn babies, treatment of sprains and magic “vaccinations” to improve swimming or fishing abilities. The treatment of bites and various other beliefs, and observations by local people on the natural history of G. ornata were also recorded. KEY WORDS.– Colubridae, Grayia ornata, Massif du Chaillu, Gabon, ethnozoology, traditional medicine. INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS During the course of conservation-oriented We interviewed local people about Grayia herpetological surveys conducted jointly by the ornata in seven localities within the Massif du Direction de la Faune et de la Chasse (DFC, Chaillu. All information was recorded in the Libreville), the World Wildlife Fund - Central presence of voucher specimens to avoid misun- African Regional Program Office derstandings by informants regarding the iden- (WWF-CARPO, Libreville) and the Wildlife tity of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Mapping of Schistosomiasis and Soil Transmitted Helminthiasis in the Northern and Eastern Health Regions of Gabon, Cent
    Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Article Baseline Mapping of Schistosomiasis and Soil Transmitted Helminthiasis in the Northern and Eastern Health Regions of Gabon, Central Africa: Recommendations for Preventive Chemotherapy Rodrigue Mintsa Nguema 1,2,3,* , Jacques F. Mavoungou 1, Krystina Mengue Me Ngou-Milama 3,4, Modeste Mabicka Mamfoumbi 2, Aubin A. Koumba 1, Mariama Sani Lamine 5, Abdoulaye Diarra 5,†, Ghislaine Nkone Asseko 5, Jean R. Mourou 2, Marielle K. Bouyou Akotet 2,Hélène Moné 6, Gabriel Mouahid 6 and Julienne Atsame 3 1 Research Institute in Tropical Ecology, National Center for Scientific and Technological Research, Libreville BP 13354, Gabon; [email protected] (J.F.M.); [email protected] (A.A.K.) 2 Department of Parasitology-Mycology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences of Libreville, Libreville BP 4009, Gabon; [email protected] (M.M.M.); [email protected] (J.R.M.); [email protected] (M.K.B.A.) 3 Control Program of Parasitic Diseases, Libreville BP 2434, Gabon; [email protected] (K.M.M.N.-M.); [email protected] (J.A.) 4 National Laboratory of Public Health, Libreville BP 10736, Gabon 5 Word Health Organization Country Office Gabon, Libreville BP 820, Gabon; [email protected] (M.S.L.); [email protected] (A.D.); [email protected] (G.N.A.) 6 IHPE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, UM, IFREMER, Univ Perpignan Via Domitia, Perpignan F-66860, France; [email protected] (H.M.); [email protected] (G.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +241-04-37-61-31 † Current Address: WHO Country Office Union des Comores, P.O. Box 435, Moroni, Union des Comores.
    [Show full text]
  • Alimentation En Eau De Libreville : Études Des Rivières Entre
    EBGIE ET WEAU DU GAB J. LERIQUE M. TOURNE Janvier 1969 OFFICE CIENTIFIQUE ET TEtHNlQUE OUTRE-MER - SIE E OFFICE DE LA RECHERCHE SOCIETE D'ENERGIE I SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE OUTRE- MER ET D'EAU DU P' GABON '. ----u-- " I ! CENTRE LIBREVILLE i --DE SECTION HYDROLOGIQUE ,-++!"- I 4' ALIMENTATION EN EAU DE LIBREVILLE ++- Etudes des rivières entre LIBREVILLE et KANGO Résultats de la campagne 1968 Janvier 1969 94tr SO M M A I R E Pages 1 - Préambule 1-1 Evolution des besoins en eau do LIBREVILLE 1 1-2 Alimentation en eau de LIBREVILLE - Historique 2 2 - La Région de L'Estuaire entre LIBREVILLE et KANGO 2-1 GênGralitÉs 4 2-2 Pluviométrie 5 2-3 GÉologie et PÉdologie 10 2-3-1 Bassin de la NZEME 2-3-2 Bassin du KOM0 I' 12 3 - Chronologie des installations 14 %' 4 - Rêsultats de la campagne 1968 4- 1 ASSANGO 17 4-2 NZEME 22 4-3 M B E 28 4-4 MIOMO 31 4-5 S A Z A 34 4-6 [vi E ß A 37 4-7 L O W E 40 &-El A Ki E B E 46 4-9 AGOULA 9 4-10 ABANGA 54 4-11 K O M O - T\li B E I 54 5 - QualitÉ des eaux 55 6 - Comparaison des rQsultats 5G Bibliographie 50 r I.- PREAMBULE 1- 1 ,!!/UTION DES BESOINS EN EAU DE LIBREVILLE c Renseignements S.E.E.G. ) Entre 1961 et 1966 la population Librevilloise a plus que doublé. D'après le recensement de 1961 l'agglomération comptait 21.400 habitants alors qu'en 1966 46.000 habitants étaient recensés.
    [Show full text]
  • Instruction Comptable Janvier20
    MINISTERE DU BUDGET REPUBLIQUE GABONAISE ET DES COMPTES PUBLICS --------------- --------------- Union - Travail - Justice SECRETARIAT GENERAL -------------- DIRECTION GENERALE DE LA COMPTABILITE PUBLIQUE ET DU TRESOR ------------- INSTRUCTION SUR LA COMPTABILITE DE L’ETAT Janvier 2017 MINISTERE DU BUDGET REPUBLIQUE GABONAISE ET DES COMPTES PUBLICS --------------- --------------- Union - Travail - Justice SECRETARIAT GENERAL -------------- DIRECTION GENERALE DE LA COMPTABILITE PUBLIQUE ET DU TRESOR ------------- INSTRUCTION SUR LA COMPTABILITE DE L’ETAT Janvier 2017 Comptabilité de l’Etat 2 Instruction sur la ccomptabilité de l’Etat Comptabilité de l’Etat 4 SOMMAIRE LIVRE 1 : DISPOSITIONS GENERALES ............................................................................................................................ 7 TITRE 1 : L’ORGANISATION DE LA DIRECTION GENERALE DE LA COMPTABILITE PUBLIQUE ET DU TRESOR...................... 9 TITRE 2 : L’ORGANISATION DE LA FONCTION COMPTABILITE ET LES PERIODES COMPTABLES ...................................... 23 LIVRE 2 : COMPTABILISATION DES OPERATIONS DE L’ETAT ....................................................................................... 35 TITRE 1: LA COMPTABILISATION DES OPERATIONS DE RECETTES ................................................................................... 37 TITRE 2: COMPTABILISATION DES OPERATIONS DE DEPENSE ET DE FINANCEMENT ...................................................... 65 TITRE 3: LES OPERATIONS DE TRESORERIE ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme, The
    United Nations DP/DCP/GAB/2 Executive Board of the Distr.: General United Nations Development 15 March 2011 English Programme, the United Nations Original: French Population Fund and the United Nations Office for Project Services Annual session 2011 6 to 17 June 2011, New York Item 6 of the provisional agenda Country programmes and related matters Draft country programme document for Gabon (2012-2016) Contents Paragraphs Page I. Situation analysis..................................................... 1–7 2 II. Past cooperation and lessons learned ..................................... 8–16 3 III. Proposed programme.................................................. 17–22 4 IV. Programme management, monitoring and evaluation........................ 23–28 5 Annex Results and resources framework .......................................... 7 11-26437 (E) 040411 080411 *1126437* DP/DCP/GAB/2 I. Situation analysis 1. Gabon has an area of 267,667 km² with a population estimated in 2003 at 1.5 million inhabitants. The population is young, with 60 per cent under 25 years of age. At present, 80 per cent of the population is urban (see Enquête gabonaise sur le suivi et l’évaluation de la pauvreté, 2005 (Gabonese survey for poverty evaluation and monitoring, 2005)) and is concentrated in the four main cities: Libreville, Port- Gentil, Owendo and Franceville. The petroleum industry alone accounts for 51.5 per cent of the gross domestic product (GDP), 64 per cent of budget revenue and 82 per cent of export earnings. 2. Despite having a per capita GDP at purchasing power parity estimated at $12,747 in 2008, one of the highest on the continent, Gabon’s social indicators are uncharacteristic, paradoxically, presenting a poverty profile similar to that of low income countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Miscellanea Herpetologica Gabonica I
    Hamadryad Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 13 – 18, 2008. �opyright 2008 �entre for Herpetology, Madras �rocodile Bank Trust. MISCELLANEA HERPETOLOGICA GABONICA I Olivier S.G. Pauwels1,2 and Patrick �avid3 1Smithsonian �nstitution, National Zoological Park, Monitoring and Assessment of Biodiversity Program, B.P. 48, Gamba, Gabon. 2Mail address �epartment of Recent Vertebrates, �nstitut Royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Rue Vautier 29, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. Email [email protected] 3UMS 602 Taxonomie - collection - Reptiles & Amphibiens, �épartement Systématique et Evolution, �ase Postale 30, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 57 rue �uvier, F-75231 Paris �edex 05, France. Email [email protected] ABSTRACT.– The lineated form of the colubrid genus Bothrophthalmus, namely B. lineatus lineatus auctorum, is deleted from the Gabon reptile list. The colubrid Lamprophis fuliginosus is confirmed for Gabon. New localities and/or ecological data are provided for Agama agama (Agamidae), Hemidactylus mabouia (Gekkonidae), Gerrhosaurus nigrolineatus (Gerrhosauridae), Feylinia grandisquamis, Panaspis breviceps (Scincidae), Varanus ornatus (Varanidae), Calabaria reinhardtii (Boidae), Grayia ornata, Natriciteres fuliginoides, Philothamnus carinatus, Thrasops flavigularis (Colubridae) and Naja melanoleuca (Elapidae). KEYWORDS.– Reptilia, Agamidae, Gekkonidae, Gerrhosauridae, Scincidae, Varanidae, Boidae, Colubridae, Elapidae, Bothrophthalmus, Lamprophis, Gabon, Africa. INTRODUCTION ties are as much as possible, substantiated by The herpetofauna of Gabon is one of the least voucher specimens. Field observations in Ga- known among tropical African countries. A pre- bon were made by OSGP (where field numbers liminary national reptile list was first available are preceded by P). New locality records are only in 2004 (Frétey and Blanc, no date; see also marked with an asterisk*, new department (dis- Pauwels, 2004), but that list has to be seriously trict) records by two**, new province records re-evaluated because of lack of material for doc- by three***.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Financing in the Republic of Gabon Public Disclosure Authorized
    A WORLD BANK STUDY Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Health Financing in the Republic of Gabon Public Disclosure Authorized Karima Saleh, Bernard F. Couttolenc, Public Disclosure Authorized and Helene Barroy Health Financing in the Republic of Gabon A WORLD BANK STUDY Health Financing in the Republic of Gabon Karima Saleh, Bernard F. Couttolenc, and Helene Barroy © 2014 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 17 16 15 14 World Bank Studies are published to communicate the results of the Bank’s work to the development com- munity with the least possible delay. The manuscript of this paper therefore has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formally edited texts. This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, inter- pretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved.
    [Show full text]