DOCSLIB.ORG

Bulletin Issue 15

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bulletin Issue 15 Copyright c 2009 Free Software Foundation How to Contribute 51 Franklin Street, 5th Floor Boston, MA 02110-1301 Associate Membership: (617)542-5942 Become an associate member of [email protected] the FSF. Members will receive http://www.fsf.org/ a bootable USB card and e-mail Issue 15 Bulletin November 2009 forwarding. To sign-up or get This bulletin was produced using more information, visit member. only free software. fsf.org or write to membership@ and some of the upcoming projects for fsf.org. Contents us here at the FSF. The articles in this bulletin are Our Web site, www.fsf.org, has individually licensed under the Online: Use your credit card or Welcome to the Bulletin 1 also been updated to reflect our cur- Creative Commons Attribu- PayPal account to make a dona- FSFin2009 2 rent fundraising drive, with video tion No Derivative Works tion at donate.fsf.org or con- Life in the Licensing 4 features from prominent members of 3.0 United States License. tact [email protected] for more Compliance Lab the free software community, includ- To view a copy of this license, information on supporting the The importance of 5 ing Samba developer Jeremy Allison, visit http://creativecommons. FSF. individual membership hardware designer for the $100 lap- org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/ Jobs: List your job offers on our Software for education, 6 top, Mary Lou Jepsen, long-term GNU or send a letter to Creative Com- jobs page. See fsf.org/jobs for not babysitting hacker and the present lead developer mons, 171 Second Street, Suite details. Campaigns Update 7 of Gnash, Rob Savoye, and copyright 300, San Francisco, California, End Software Patents 7 activist Cory Doctorow. 94105, USA. United Way: As a 501(c)(3) The computer in my 9 These videos represent the van- tax-exempt organization, the pocket guard of what is possible on the Web FSF is eligible to receive United now — with support for the free Ogg Way funds. See fsf.org/uw for Theora and Vorbis multimedia formats more information. Welcome to the Bul- built into many of the Web browsers Free Software Directory: being used, we can bring more inter- Browse and download from thou- letin active and engaging video media to sands of different free software our advocacy work. As an example of by Matt Lee projects! directory.fsf.org this, we’ve dug up a video of former Campaigns manager campaigns manager and now opera- Volunteer: To learn more, visit elcome to another issue of the tions manager, John Sullivan, from the fsf.org/volunteer. WFree Software Foundation Bul- archives. This video, shot in 2007, fea- letin. Right now, we’re in the middle tures John explaining the basics of free Free Software Supporter: of our busy fundraising season. As a software and makes an excellent intro- Make sure you’re getting all the supporter of the Free Software Foun- duction to the subject for any newcom- very latest news from the FSF at shop.fsf.org dation, we depend on your generosity ers, as well as providing a good exam- fsf.org/fss. — in the form of donations and asso- ple of how our various campaigns re- ciate memberships — to do the work LibrePlanet: Find local groups late to each other. Work done by the we do. So, in a change of pace from in your area or start your own at pioneering Xiph.org hackers and advo- our usual Bulletin format, I have asked libreplanet.org! cacy from PlayOgg is now affecting real the staff at the Free Software Founda- change in all of the FSF’s campaign ac- tion to give an update on how your fi- tions. nancial support has been used recently, 12 1 FSF in 2009 tem, register those copyrights with the laptops. Ubuntu’s decision to ship a We must not forget that, in almost US Copyright Office, and use the copy- new binary driver remains more con- all cases, these computers remain con- by Peter Brown right system to enforce the terms of troversial than the fact that the vast trolled, completely and ultimately, by Executive Director our copyleft licenses to guarantee re- majority of the world’s computer-using companies that very few of us trust at he free software movement is one spect for the freedom that our licenses population knows nothing other than all. Tthe most successful social move- promise, to all recipients. phone-based computers that remain al- I’m not sure how we will accom- ments to emerge in the past 25 years, Third, we campaign to raise aware- most unthinkably unfree and which re- plish this task. But more of us need to driven by a worldwide community of ness of the ethical benefits of free soft- main almost entirely unfreeable when think long, hard, and creatively about ethical programmers dedicated to free- ware and against the use of proprietary compared to personal computers. For this problem. I’ll be calling my phone dom and sharing. Its impact on our fu- software. Our campaign against Dig- most of the world’s computer users, “my computer” as a first, very per- ture is growing every day. But the ulti- ital Restrictions Management (DRM) there is no option of, and essentially sonal, step. I have done this over the mate success of the free software move- at defectivebydesign.org turned ac- no hope for, freedom on their current last week and it has led to some conver- ment depends on teaching our friends, ceptance of anti-user technology mea- devices. sations with slightly confused acquain- neighbors and work colleagues to rec- sures into a public campaign that It shocks me that anyone, espe- tances. Of course, this doesn’t make ognize the danger of not having soft- now makes DRM systems highly un- cially free software advocates, would my phone any less free. But it does ware freedom — a freedom that they popular. Our successful campaign happily put up with such nonfree com- mean I’m talking more about the non- have lost, often without recognizing it, against adoption of Windows Vista, puters. I think part of the reason lies freeness most of us have put up with to proprietary software. and our new campaign against Win- in the fact that most users of mobile too silently. The FSF is currently working on dows 7, have raised widespread con- phones, and even most phone users At this stage, that seems like three fronts to advance the cause of cern about how proprietary software that care about software freedom and progress. the free software movement. First, works against the interest of all cit- technological autonomy, don’t think of in software, we sponsor the GNU izens. Our campaigns to promote their phones as computers. Thinking project and promote the adoption of free formats such as OpenDocument that our phones as computers will not fully free GNU/Linux distributions and PlayOgg have achieved widespread solve any of the problems I’ve alluded gnu.org/distros like gNewSense and support. And finally, our 20-year cam- to. But doing so remains an essen- Trisquel. We identify high prior- paign against software patents will this tial first step toward any solution. Al- ity free software projects at fsf.org/ year see our legal brief from our End though we must still work to build vi- campaigns/priority.html that need Software Patents campaign gain atten- able, widely accessible, and compelling developer focus and resources to ad- tion from the US Supreme Court in a free phones, we must first convince vance the adoption of GNU/Linux sys- landmark ruling expected in May 2010. both users and developers that this is tems, and we work to alert the commu- Of course, we do all this work in an important goal. Reminding peo- nity to threats to free software, such as collaboration with free software users ple that our phones, both free and the seduction by popular but patent- and developers like you, who volunteer nonfree, are powerful general-purpose encumbered platforms, or misleading their time to help a campaign, or who computers remains an important and efforts that direct developers to create join a GNU project to hack on code, still largely unfufilled part of this pro- free software for proprietary platforms. or who become associate members to cess. Second, in licensing, we publish show their support and fund our ef- We must find ways to remind our- the world’s most popular free soft- forts. Thank you! selves and others of the fact that mod- ware licenses, including the GNU Gen- ern phones are powerful computers eral Public License, and provide li- with powerful interfaces that are use- censing help and guidance to the free Life in the Licensing ful for an unimaginable variety of ar- software developer community through Compliance Lab bitrary applications. We must focus our Free Software Licensing and Com- on the fact that these computers have pliance Lab. At the Lab we collect by Brett Smith microphones, sensors, and other sen- copyrights from thousands of develop- Licensing Engineer sors and that we trust them with our ers working on the GNU operating sys- closest secrets and most sensitive data. 2 11 Microsoft in 2007 began claiming that Bilski case unfolds at news.swpat. tomers that they had the right to share the kernel violates 235 of its patents — org. and change some of the software they although the patents have never been received. That finally put an end to a specified. Neither could be precise, but case that had been open for more than they give us ballpark figures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Walled Gardens of Ebook Surveillance: a Brief Set of Arguments Against DRM in Libraries
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research CUNY Graduate Center 2015 The Walled Gardens of Ebook Surveillance: A Brief Set of Arguments Against DRM in Libraries Alycia Sellie Graduate Center, CUNY How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_pubs/162 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Walled Gardens of Ebook Surveillance: A Brief Set of Arguments Against DRM in Libraries There are three claims I will make in this article about including electronic books with DRM restrictions in library collections. These arguments center upon what the presence of restricted ebooks signifies to patrons about libraries. The first argument outlines how providing books with DRM encourages library users to adopt low expectations for how their personal information will be shared and collected. Second, when users encounter DRM within library collections, not only are they frustrated by the ways that these systems restrict their use of a text, but they become more broadly disappointed in their library. Finally, I will show how the current technological landscape that allows third party surveillance via DRM threatens the professional standing of librarians as protectors of patron information. What is DRM? To me, DRM stands for Digital Restrictions Management. But choosing to call it such is a political choice.1 Others refer to DRM as Digital Rights Management. In a nutshell, DRM controls access to digital content and restricts the functionality a devices, such as an ebook reader or computer.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaromil's Research 2009
    Jaromil’s Research 2009 Jaromil’s Journal of Musings November 12, 2010 Almost every day I dedicate 2 good hours to research: nothing in particular, just looking around for inspirations, tools, publications and what not. Thanks go to the NIMk1 employing me in research and development. This diary is still in fieri: some links are scattered and still lacking comments, while it will grow complete over time, you might be also interested to read the research diary 20082. : Mon, 5 Jan 2009 John Maddog Hall: http://www.linux-magazine.com/online/blogs/paw_prints_writings_of_the_ maddog/campus_party_brazil_maddog_s_challenge_multimedia_and_free_software : Wed, 7 Jan 2009 uscito zeitgeist final ??? Not quite in the zone Fri, 9 Jan 2009 http://www.metamute.org/en/content/not_quite_in_the_zone Ben Watson http://www.militantesthetix. co.uk/ Politics in Israel Tue, 13 Jan 2009 Just before the elections in Israel and right after the massacre of civilians in Gaza, which also included bombing of UN headquarters and public incitations to murder peace activists3, it’s maybe time to have a look at how reasonable people are doing over there. One impressive campaign is December 18th4: at the motto of FREE THE SHMINISTIM“ young conscious objectors (among them also the daughter of a former deputy head of Mossad) stepped forward and refused to serve the omnipresent militarization of Israel, the country where they are born and that still forces them to serve IDF for 2 to 3 years. Since 20 years now (and finally) we had abolition of coercive military service for youth in Europe: this is definitely one of the most important political standpoints for Israel to work on, if it intends to get closer to Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Software
    Open Source Software Agenda ● Definitions of different “types” of software ● Key characteristics of each type ● Key points of difference ● Cost of free/open source software ● Historical overview ● Licenses ● Examples of free/open source alternatives in a few domains Agenda (cont.) ● Extensions of the “open source” philosophy to other domains ● The anti-open-source brigade ● Reasons for using OSS Open source software ● Software whose source code can be viewed, modified and re-distributed in its modified form after it meets certain licensing restrictions, e.g., – indicating the authorship of various components – requiring that the modified version of the product also be open-sourced Free software ● As defined by Richard Stallman, affords the following freedoms to its users: – Freedom 0: The freedom to run the program for any purpose. – Freedom 1: The freedom to study how the program works, and change it to make it do what you wish. – Freedom 2: The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor. – Freedom 3: The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements (and modified versions in general) to the public, so that the whole community benefits. Source: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html Differences between open source and free software ● “The term 'open source' software is used by some people to mean more or less the same category as free software. It is not exactly the same class of software: they accept some licenses that we consider too restrictive, and there are free software licenses they have not
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2006
    Annual Report 2006 Table of contents Foreword Letter from the Chairman, Dave Neary 4–5 A year in review 2006—a year in GNOME 8–10 Distributions in 2006 11 Events and community initiatives GUADEC—The GNOME Conference 12–13 GNOME hackers descend on MIT Media Center 14–15 GNOME User Groups 16 The www.gnome.org revamp 17 GNOME platform 17 GNOME Foundation Administrator 17 Foundation development The Women’s Summer Outreach Program 18–20 The GNOME Mobile and Embedded Initiative 21 The GNOME Advisory Board 22–23 PHOTO The GNOME Foundation Board and Advisory Board members by David Zeuthen (continued on the inside back cover) GNOME Foundation 3 Dear Friends, All traditions need a starting point, they say. What you now hold in your hands is the first annual report of the GNOME Foundation, at the end of what has been an eventful year for us. Each year brings its challenges and rewards for the members of this global project. This year, many of our biggest challenges are in the legal arena. European countries have been passing laws to conform with the European Union Copyright Directive, and some, including France, have brought into law provisions which we as software developers find it hard to understand, but which appear to make much of what we do illegal. We have found our- selves in the center of patent wars as bigger companies jockey for position with offerings based on our hard work. And we are scratching our heads trying to figure out how to deal with the constraints of DRM and patents in multimedia, while still offering our users access to their media files.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Open Source Industry & Community Report 2008
    The Australian Open Source Industry & Community Report 2008 Sponsors & Industry Community Map of Education & Supporters Respondents Skills 5 9 11 12 15 Careers & Innovation The Market Business Opinion Employment Development 17 19 19 21 23 Methodology. The Australian Open Source Industry & Community Report was Promotion commissioned and executed by Waugh Partners, with the financial support of sponsors, NICTA, IBM and Fujitsu. The Census was directly promoted through a national roadshow which traveled to every capital city, on several mailing lists including Linux We worked closely with psychometricians and statisticians provided by Australia, Open Source Industry Australia and user groups around the NICTA, our primary research partner, to ensure the end-to-end quality country, and through direct contact with Open Source community of the research. While our sponsors and supporters provided feedback members and companies. Indirect promotion included blogging, media at numerous points throughout the project lifecycle, this report is the coverage, and notification to members of the Australia Computer result of independent analysis by Waugh Partners. It is based on data Society, AIIA, OzZope and numerous other organisations. collected through a pair of online surveys held between October and December 2007. Projections Community We have been very careful to make conservative projections, particularly related to industry revenue. The community survey was aimed at “individuals who contribute to Open Source projects and communities in any capacity, not just Our projected industry and export revenue figures are based upon software development”, and received 315 complete and legitimate the projected industry size and spread of companies compared to the responses, with 66 incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethical Visions of Copyright Law
    GRIMMELMANN FINAL 3/30/2009 10:08:14 PM View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Commons @ UM Law THE ETHICAL VISIONS OF COPYRIGHT LAW James Grimmelmann* INTRODUCTION All of intellectual property law is an act of imagination. If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to call it “property,” the tree still exists. But the objects of intellectual property have no existence apart from what we give them. You can’t copyright an unwritten novel; you have no trademark rights in a word the consuming public has never heard of. We must imagine these things into being before we can make them the subject of legal rights and obligations. Nor is the work of imagination done at the moment of creation. We must constantly play a game of practical metaphysics to grant legal rights over things that can’t be seen or touched. When the legal system says that this assembly of gears and levers infringes on that set of marks on a piece of paper, it’s calling an abstraction into being. The “invention” that connects the two is itself a creation of the legal mind no less than the arrangement of parts is a creation of the engineering mind. Lawyers must decide whether a given abstraction is an invention at all (most of us would agree that a short story isn’t one); whether it has attributes like “new,” “useful,” “obvious,” and so on; and what exactly its limits are. None of these distinctions come ready-made in nature; they require continuous, purposeful, collective imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • Visión General Del Sistema GNU
    Traducciones de esta página Historia Filosofía Licencias Descargas Ayude a GNU ¡Únase a la FSF! Why GNU/Linux? Buscar Visión general del sistema GNU The GNU operating system is a complete free software system, upward­compatible with Unix. GNU stands for “GNU's Not Unix”. Richard Stallman made the Initial Announcement of the GNU Project in September 1983. A longer version called the GNU Manifesto was published in March 1985. It has been translated into several other languages. The name “GNU” was chosen because it met a few requirements; first, it was a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not Unix”, second, because it was a real word, and third, it was fun to say (or Sing). La palabra «libre» se refiere a libertad, no a precio [N. del T.: en inglés se usa la misma palabra para libre y gratuito]. Puedes o no pagar un precio por obtener software de GNU. De cualquier manera, una vez que obtienes el software, tienes tres libertades específicas para usarlo. La primera, la libertad de copiar el programa y darlo a tus amigos o compañeros de trabajo. La segunda la libertad de cambiar el programa como desees, por tener acceso completo al código fuente. La tercera, la libertad de distribuir una versión mejorada ayudando así a construir la comunidad (si redistribuye software de GNU, puede cobrar una tarifa por el acto físico de efectuar la copia, o bien puede regalar copias.). El proyecto para desarrollar el sistema GNU se denomina «Proyecto GNU». El Proyecto GNU se concibió en 1983 como una forma de devolver el espíritu cooperativo que prevalecía en la comunidad computacional en sus primeros días; hacer la cooperación posible al eliminar los obstáculos impuestos por los dueños de software privativo.
    [Show full text]
  • When You're Windows Are Broken Don't Be Surprised If You Feel The
    ecolonomics Paul Mobbs' newsletter of thoughts, ideas and observations on energy, economics and human ecology http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/ecolonomics/ [email protected] When You're Windows are Broken don't be Surprised if you Feel the Cold Draught of Distress The phone rings; against the background noise of a call centre a young man says, “I am phoning about your Windows computer”. I reply casually, “I don't have a Windoze com- puter” (I always make an effort to nasally sound the 'z' consonant). He apologises and rings off. Later his simple statement begins to bother me; why would anyone assume an automatic connection between the concepts “Windows” and “computer” when clearly Windoze is one of the worst operating systems that you can load onto a computer in order to use it creatively? Banbury, Thursday 23rd December 2010. I'm sitting in my office below the skylight. This I don't want to be here. There are so many oth- pretty much typifies my existence for the last few er more interesting things I could be doing months. However, whilst usually I'm labouring here today; as I sit looking through my window on the on behalf of someone else today I'm labouring here snowy-white world I'd certainly rather be out- for myself. It's nearly Christmas and, as usual (it's side. I'm here for one simple reason – it's neces- the quiet point in the year), I'm conducting my annu- sary. Whether I like it or not, I need computers to al systems back-up, re-stall and reload pantomime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intel Management Engine: an Attack on Computer Users' Freedom by Denis Gnutoo Carikli
    A statement by FSF President Richard Stallman on the Intel Management Engine (ME): "Meltdown and Spectre are errors. Grave errors, to be sure, but not evidently malicious. Everyone makes mistakes. Intel has done far worse with its CPUs than make a mistake. It has built in an intentional back door called the Management Engine. Important as these bugs are, don©t let Intel©s mistakes distract you from Intel©s deliberate attack!" The Intel Management Engine: an attack on computer users© freedom By Denis GNUtoo Carikli With security issues like the Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities (https://www.cnet.com/news/meltdown-spectre-intel-ceo-no-recall-chip-processor/) discovered in Intel chips in early 2018, it became more important than ever to talk about the necessity of software freedom in these deeply embedded technologies. Serious as though these bugs may be, we cannot let them distract us from the broader issues: Intel considers the Intel Management Engine a feature, while it©s nothing more than a threat to user freedom. Thanks to Denis GNUtoo Carikli, we have a new basis for that conversation in this article. The Intel Management Engine is a tool that ships with Intel chipsets, purportedly to ease the job of system administrators. But in reality, it is another restriction on user freedoms, imposed by a company, and used to control your computing. Carikli offers a moderately technical explanation of what©s happening with Management Engine, the ways in which it restricts rather than empowers users, and how it violates the four freedoms of free software. Carikli may be best known for his work on the Replicant project (https://www.replicant.us/), which he co-founded with Aaron Williamson, Bradley Kuhn, and Grazlano Sorbaioli.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 160 May, 2020
    Volume 160 May, 2020 Short Topix: Zoombombing Is A Crime, Not A Prank GIMP Tutorial: Photo Editing, Part 3 PCLinuxOS Magazine Friends & Family - jzakiya Champions Of Regnum On PCLinuxOS EBCDIC Handling Library, Part 2 PCLinuxOS Recipe Corner: Lemon Pepper Chicken ms_meme's Nook: The Linux Bounce Wallpaper Roundup, Revisited Finally! ShotCut Running On PCLinuxOS And more inside! PCLinuxOS Magazine Page 1 In This Issue... 3 From The Chief Editor's Desk... 5 Staying "Safe" While You Stream: DBD's Tips On Living DRM-Free During Quarantine The PCLinuxOS name, logo and colors are the trademark of 6 Screenshot Showcase Texstar. 7 PCLinuxOS Recipe Corner: Lemon Pepper Chicken The PCLinuxOS Magazine is a monthly online publication containing PCLinuxOS-related materials. It is published 8 Wallpaper Roundup, Revisited primarily for members of the PCLinuxOS community. The magazine staff is comprised of volunteers from the 13 Screenshot Showcase PCLinuxOS community. 14 ms_meme's Nook: I Want It That Way Visit us online at http://www.pclosmag.com 15 Short Topix: Zoombombing Is A Crime, Not A Prank This release was made possible by the following volunteers: 19 Screenshot Showcase Chief Editor: Paul Arnote (parnote) 20 GIMP Tutorial: Photo Editing, Part 3 Assistant Editor: Meemaw Artwork: Sproggy, Timeth, ms_meme, Meemaw 22 Better than Zoom: Magazine Layout: Paul Arnote, Meemaw, ms_meme HTML Layout: YouCanToo Try These Free Software Tools For Staying In Touch Staff: 25 PCLinuxOS Family Member Spotlight: jzakiya ms_meme CgBoy Meemaw YouCanToo 26 Screenshot Showcase Gary L. Ratliff, Sr. Pete Kelly Daniel Meiß-Wilhelm phorneker 27 Champions Of Regnum On PCLinuxOS daiashi Khadis Thok 32 Screenshot Showcase Alessandro Ebersol Smileeb 33 EBCDIC Handling Library, Part 2 Contributors: 44 PCLinuxOS Bonus Recipe Corner: jzakiya Mashed Potato Mac & Cheese Bake 45 Screenshot Showcase The PCLinuxOS Magazine is released under the Creative 46 Finally! ShotCut Running On PCLinuxOS! Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share-Alike 3.0 Unported license.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M
    Free Software, Free Society Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman Third Edition Richard M. Stallman This is the third edition of Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman. Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor Boston, MA 02110-1335 Copyright c 2002, 2010, 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire book are permitted worldwide, without royalty, in any medium, provided this notice is preserved. Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this book from the original English into another language provided the translation has been approved by the Free Software Foundation and the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved on all copies. ISBN 978-0-9831592-5-4 Cover design and photograph by Kyle Winfree. iii Table of Contents Foreword to the Third Edition ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: iv Foreword to the First Edition :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: vi Preface ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: x Part I: The GNU Project and Free Software 1 What Is Free Software? :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 3 2 The GNU Project :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 9 3 The Initial Announcement of the GNU Operating System ::: 26 4 Free Software Is Even More Important Now ::::::::::::::::::: 28 5 Why Schools Should Exclusively Use Free Software::::::::::: 34 6 Measures Governments Can Use to Promote Free Software :: 36 7 Why Free Software Needs Free Documentation::::::::::::::::
    [Show full text]
  • Free Software
    FEATURE FREE SOFTWARE OF THE BEST THINGS ABOUT FREE SOFTWARE 2014 This year will be the best ever for Linux and Free Software. Why? Mike Saunders has 51 reasons… 38 www.linuxvoice.com FREE SOFTWARE FEATURE or so long, it looked like Linux While the almighty annihilation of little Linux machines in their pockets. was on the cusp of causing a Windows never happened, a much And the Raspberry Pi has been a Frevolution, of pulling the masses more subtle set of changes took storming success, introducing children away from Windows and introducing place. Linux is everywhere now – worldwide to open computing. them to a new world of computing. but not many people know it. GNU/ 2014 has a huge amount in store for Linux distributions were becoming Linux powers many of the biggest Linux users, and not just in terms of easier to use by the month, desktop websites in the world, serving up web software – people, communities and applications were being refined and applications to hundreds of millions of events will also shape the course of the polished, and PC vendors were starting users. Android dominates the mobile year. So read on for 51 awesome things to ship Linux with their machines. scene, with countless people carrying to look forward to… FEDORA 21 FIREFOX Fedora 21 bucks the VERIFIED BUILDS trend of previous Even if you’re running an releases by having a open source browser, longer development you can’t be 100% cycle than usual certain that the binary which will hopefully executable doesn’t 1provide more time for have an NSA backdoor new technologies like inserted, possibly via Wayland to settle down.
    [Show full text]