DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Marine Resources Site Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of Marine Resources Site Report Department of Marine Saltwind Seafarm, LLC Matthew Hassler Resources Site Report 2 Mayflower Drive Scarborough, ME 04074 207-730-2892 Figure 1: Vicinity map1 Location: Nonesuch River, Scarborough, Cumberland County, Maine Purpose: Experimental lease for the suspended culture of American/Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) and European oysters (Ostrea edulis) Site Review by: Flora Drury and Cheyenne Adams Report Preparation by: Flora Drury, Marcy Nelson, and Cheyenne Adams Report Submitted: July 13, 2020 1 All figures in this report were created in ArcMap version 10.6 using digitized NOAA Nautical Charts or geo- referenced aerial photographs provided by Google Earth (May 9, 2016) or The Maine Office of GIS (orthoCoastalMaineCoastalProgram2003). Saltwind Seafarm, LLC (Nonesuch River) PAGE 1 July 13, 2020 The applicant, Saltwind Seafarm, LLC, is requesting a 3.15-acre lease in the Nonesuch River for the suspended culture of American/Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) and European oysters (Ostrea edulis). The applicant plans to deploy up to 900 floating cages on the proposed lease site, arranged in 30 strings (referred to in the application as “rope kits”) comprised of 30 cages each.2 On June 2, 2020, Maine Department of Marine Resources (MDMR) staff Flora Drury and Cheyenne Adams visited the proposed experimental aquaculture lease site. MDMR staff arrived on site at approximately 2:00 pm. Low tide on June 2, 2020 was at 2:36 pm. General Characteristics The proposed lease is located in the Nonesuch River in Scarborough, Maine (Figure 2). Marshland, dominated by saltmarsh grass (Spartina alterniflora), composes the surrounding uplands (Images 1-6). A small, camouflaged building, potentially used as a blind, was observed on the uplands to the east of the proposal (Figure 2 & Image 7). The shoreline nearby the proposed lease is comprised primarily of sand. Historical aerial images of the area, along with observed sections of eroding shoreline, indicate that the subtidal, intertidal, and upland substrate in the area is not static and is instead subject to frequent shifts and redistribution. Figure 2: Proposed lease area and approximate low water line observed on June 2, 2020. 2 Application, page 20 Saltwind Seafarm, LLC (Nonesuch River) PAGE 2 July 13, 2020 Depth According to the application, the proposed lease site was intended to be subtidal; specifically, the application indicates the proposed lease is located in depths between 3 and 5 feet at mean low water.3 MDMR visited the area on June 2, 2020 and confirmed the subtidal nature of the proposal. However, depths collected during the site visit indicate that portions of the site are shallower than the lease application states. On June 2, 2020, MDMR collected depth measurements at the proposal between 2:00 and 2:30 pm. Low tide was predicted at 2:36 pm with a height of -0.16 feet on this date. MDMR’s approximate mean low water measurements show the two western corners of the proposed lease to be ~4 feet deep, while the NE and SE corners were measured to be approximately 10 and 14 inches deep, respectively. As is discernable from these depth measurements, the lease increases in depth from east to west. However, the nature of the depth increase is not gradual, but instead is the result of a drop-off from the shallow water on the eastern portion of the lease into the deeper channel in the center of the waterway. According to MDMR’s depth measurements, this channel is approximately 4 feet deep at mean low water. At the time of MDMR’s review, the drop-off into this channel was located roughly in the center of the southern half of the proposed lease site; in the northern third of the proposed lease, the drop-off was located along the eastern boundary (Figure 3). These measurements match the location of the Nonesuch River channel as observed in geo-referenced aerial photography taken on May 9, 2016 and displayed in Figures 2 and 3. Therefore, more “deep” water (~4 feet at mean low water) is located at the northern end of the site than at the southern end. The ever-changing nature of the area and the inherent error associated with hand-held GPS units makes it difficult to identify where the “deep” waters of the channel would be located during the entire three- year term of an experimental lease. 3 Application pages 16 & 37 Saltwind Seafarm, LLC (Nonesuch River) PAGE 3 July 13, 2020 Figure 3: Proposed lease area and depths observed on June 2, 2020. Table 1: Tide predictions at Old Orchard Beach, Maine (43.5167° N, 70.3667° W)4 Date Time Height (ft.) 6/2/2020 2:15 AM 0.01 L 6/2/2020 8:33 AM 9.49 H 6/2/2020 2:36 PM -0.16 L 6/2/2020 9:01 PM 10.39 L Position and Distances to Shore POSAID Positioning Software was used to calculate distances and bearings between proposed lease corners. Distances to shore were determined using ArcMap 10.6, digitized NOAA Charts, digital orthophotography provided by the Maine Office of GIS (orthoMaineCoastalProgram2003), aerial photos provided by Google Earth (May 9, 2016), and the application coordinates. 4 http://tbone.biol.sc.edu/tide/tideshow.cgi Saltwind Seafarm, LLC (Nonesuch River) PAGE 4 July 13, 2020 WGS84 Application Coordinates – 3.15 Acres (Figure 3) Corner Latitude Longitude 1/NW 43.5568° N 70.3357° W then 112.13 feet at 108.97o True to 2/NE 43.5567° N 70.3353° W then 1226.62 feet at 202.89o True to 4/SE 43.5536° N 70.3371° W then 112.13 feet at 288.97 True to 3/SW 43.5537° N 70.3375 W then 1226.62 feet at 22.89 True to Corner 1/NW. Images 1 & 2: Looking northeast and east, respectively, from the middle of the proposed eastern boundary (June 2, 2020). Saltwind Seafarm, LLC (Nonesuch River) PAGE 5 July 13, 2020 Images 3 & 4: Looking south and southwest, respectively, from the middle of the proposed eastern boundary (June 2, 2020). Images 5 & 6: Looking southwest and northwest, respectively, from the middle of the proposed eastern boundary (June 2, 2020). Saltwind Seafarm, LLC (Nonesuch River) PAGE 6 July 13, 2020 Image 7: Small, camouflaged building located northeast of the proposed lease (June 2, 2020). Table 2: Approximate Distances (Figures 1-4) Corner 1 to nearest uplands ~220 feet to the west Corner 2 to nearest uplands ~90 feet to the east Corner 4 to nearest uplands ~230 feet to the east Corner 3 to nearest uplands ~510 feet to the west Northern section of eastern boundary to approximate low water line ~100 feet to the east Northern section of western boundary to approximate low water line ~145 feet to the west Corner 2 to Nonesuch Boat Ramp ~5,000 feet to the northeast Corner 4 to Pine Point Boat Launch ~3,350 feet to the south Saltwind Seafarm, LLC (Nonesuch River) PAGE 7 July 13, 2020 Water Quality Classification The proposed lease is in an area currently classified by the Department of Marine Resources Water Quality Classification Program as approved for the harvest of shellfish. Bottom Characteristics Bottom characteristics were categorized using the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS), a national standard for describing features of the marine environment (Table 3). Sediment information was determined based on visual analysis of the bottom from above the water’s surface; no sediment samples were taken, or grain size analysis performed. The bottom of the proposed lease site visible to MDMR staff consists primarily of sand. Table 3. Bottom characteristics Substrate Origin Substrate Class Substrate Subclass Substrate Group Unconsolidated Fine Unconsolidated Geologic Substrate Sand Mineral Substrate Substrate The criteria MDMR uses to determine the suitability of an experimental aquaculture operation to a particular area (MDMR Regulations Chapter 2.64(11)(A)) are discussed, with respect to the proposal, below: (1) Riparian Owners Ingress and Egress The proposed lease occupies area in the Nonesuch River. The Scarborough Marsh Wildlife Management Area, which is owned and managed by the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (MDIF&W), surrounds the proposed lease area. No riparian access points are located within 1,000 feet of the proposed lease area, although a small camouflaged building is located approximately 200 feet to the northeast. The nearest moorings to the proposed lease site are located to the south and are associated with the Pine Point Boat Launch. Although navigation in the area, especially at lower tidal stages, is likely to be impacted by the proposal, if granted, state managers and members of the public may continue to land vessels on the shorelines of the Nonesuch River both south and north of the lease site, without impediment, to access the surrounding uplands and aforementioned building. It is likely that most vessels navigating in the area will also be able to access the shorelines immediately west of the proposal because, according to measurements taken by MDMR staff on June 2, 2020, along with geo-referenced aerial photography taken on May 9, 2016, it appears the proposed western boundary is located between 100 and 175 feet from the mean low water line on the Nonesuch River’s western shoreline. An estimated minimum of 100 feet of channel would remain available to the west of the proposed lease. At mean low water, a shallow shelf extends from the eastern side of the river and poses a natural barrier to landing vessels along this shoreline (Figure 3). However, at mean low water an estimated minimum of 50 feet is located between the eastern boundary of the proposal and the Nonesuch Saltwind Seafarm, LLC (Nonesuch River) PAGE 8 July 13, 2020 River’s eastern shoreline, at the closest point.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West Branch Penobscot Fishing Report
    West Branch Penobscot Fishing Report Tsarism and authorial Cal blacktops, but Tomlin interminably laving her Bodoni. Converted Christopher coups dumbstruck.horridly. Vasiform Joseph wambled no spindrift exhausts clerically after Elton temps meritoriously, quite Read across for example of the future uses and whitefish, west branch of things like anglers There certainly are patterns, year to year, day to day, but your fishing plans always need to be flexible this time of year. Maine has an equal vote with other states on the ASMFC Striped Bass Board, which meets next Tuesday, Feb. New fishing destinations in your area our Guiding! Continue reading the results are in full swing and feeding fish are looking. Atlantic Salmon fry have been stocked from the shores of Bowlin Camps Lodge each year. East Outlet dam is just as as! Of which flow into Indian Pond reach Season GEAR Species Length Limit Total Bag. Anyone ever fish the East and West Branches of Kennebec. And they provide a great fish for families to target. No sign of the first big flush of young of the year alewives moving down river, but we are due any day now. Good technique and local knowledge may be your ticket to catching trout. Salmon, smelt, shad, and alewife were historically of high value to the commercial fishing industry. As the tide dropped out of this bay there was one pack of striped bass that packed themselves so tightly together and roamed making tight circles as they went. Food, extra waterproof layers, and hot drinks are always excellent choices. John watershed including the Northwest, Southwest, and Baker branches, and the Little and Big Black Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Saco River Saco & Biddeford, Maine
    Environmental Assessment Finding of No Significant Impact, and Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation for Maintenance Dredging DRAFT Saco River Saco & Biddeford, Maine US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS New England District March 2016 Draft Environmental Assessment: Saco River FNP DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation Saco River Saco & Biddeford, Maine FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT MAINTENANCE DREDGING March 2016 New England District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 696 Virginia Rd Concord, Massachusetts 01742-2751 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT HISTORY, NEED, AND AUTHORITY .......................................... 1 3.0 PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................... 3 4.0 ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................ 6 4.1 No Action Alternative ..................................................................................... 6 4.2 Maintaining Channel at Authorized Dimensions............................................. 6 4.3 Alternative Dredging Methods ........................................................................ 6 4.3.1 Hydraulic Cutterhead Dredge....................................................................... 7 4.3.2 Hopper Dredge ........................................................................................... 7 4.3.3 Mechanical Dredge ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lidar and Other Evidence for the Southwest Continuation and Late Quaternary Reactivation of the Norumbega Fault System and a Cr
    LIDAR and other evidence for the southwest continuation and Late Quaternary reactivation of the Norumbega Fault System and a cross-cutting structure near Biddeford, Maine, USA Ronald T . Marple1 and James D. Hurd, Jr .2 1. 403 Wickersham Avenue, Fort Benning, Georgia 31905, USA 2. Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, The University of Connecticut, 1376 Storrs Road, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-4087, USA Corresponding author <[email protected]> Date received: 14 April 2019 ¶ Date accepted: 01 September 2019 ABSTRACT High-resolution LiDAR (light detection and ranging) images reveal numerous NE-SW-trending geomorphic lineaments that may represent the southwest continuation of the Norumbega fault system (NFS) along a broad, 30- to 50-km-wide zone of brittle faults that continues at least 100 km across southern Maine and southeastern New Hampshire. These lineaments are characterized by linear depressions and valleys, linear drainage patterns, abrupt bends in rivers, and linear scarps. The Nonesuch River, South Portland, and Mackworth faults of the NFS appear to continue up to 100 km southwest of the Saco River along prominent but discontinuous LiDAR lineaments. Southeast-facing scarps that cross drumlins along some of the lineaments in southern Maine suggest that late Quaternary displacements have occurred along these lineaments. Several NW-SE-trending geomorphic features and geophysical lineaments near Biddeford, Maine, may represent a 30-km-long, NW-SE-trending structure that crosses part of the NFS. Brittle NW- SE-trending, pre-Triassic faults in the Kittery Formation at Biddeford Pool, Maine, support this hypothesis. RÉSUMÉ Des images haute résolution prises par LiDAR (détection et télémétrie par ondes lumineuses) dévoilent de nombreux linéaments orientés du NE vers le SO qui pourraient représenter la continuité au sud-ouest du système de failles de Norumbega (SFN) le long d’une vaste zone de 30 à 50 km de largeur de failles cassantes qui se poursuit sur au moins 100 km à travers le sud du Maine et le sud-est du New Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Scarborough Beach Scarborough Higgins Beach Scarborough
    Higgins Beach Scarborough Beach Scarborough Scarborough The variations in the profiles along Higgins Beach may relate to the three different beach types found at each of the profile locations. HI1 is located at the base of a large rip-rap seawall; this wall is “active” at high stages of the tide – that is, tidal water and wave activity is in contact with the seawall. This is reflected in the less berm development and general low variability of the mean profiles, especially as compared with HI2. HI2, though it starts at a seawall, is located at a portion of the beach that has more sediment, and undergoes more seasonal changes, and is not active during high tide phases. HI3 is heavily influenced by the spit end of Higgins Beach, which terminates at the Spurwink River ebb-tidal delta; this area undergoes large changes At SC2 annual variability is greater than at SC1. From Seasonal variability at SC2 shows the expected due to sediment movement and availability 1999 to 2000 and 2005 to 2006 about 1 meter of influence of the summer berm on the upper profile with at the spit and ebb-tidal delta. sediment was lost and the dune appears to have greater variability than in winter. The outer profile has receded. From 2006 to 2007 the mean profile lowered greater winter variability consistent with seasonal about a meter - some of which may be due to the 2007 sandbar migration. Patriots’ Day Storm. Data at Scarborough Beach indicate that the beach undergoes typical seasonal changes and that the beach is generally stable.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 VRMP Annual Report
    Volunteer River Monitoring Program 2019 Data Report VRMP March 2021 Contact: Kristin Feindel Phone: (207) 215-3461 MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 17 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04330-0017 www.maine.gov/dep/index.html Maine Department of Environmental Protection VRMP 2019 Data Report Acknowledgements & Credits VRMP Staff Team (Maine DEP) Mary Ellen Dennis (retired 2019) Kristin Feindel Katie Goodwin (Americorps/Maine Conservation Corps) Tayelor Gosselin (Americorps/Maine Conservation Corps) Volunteer Coordinators and Data Managers Becky Secrest & Ferg Lea - Androscoggin River Watershed Council Ed Friedman - Friends of Merrymeeting Bay Greg Bither - Friends of Scarborough Marsh Toby Jacobs, Fred Dillion & Ben Libby - Presumpscot Regional Land Trust Bob Kennedy - Rockport Conservation Commission Jacob Aman - Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve Theo & Wes Pratt - Weskeag River Photograph Credits Photographs courtesy of Jeff Varricchione, Cynthia Montanez, Rich Obrey, Bob Kennedy, Mary Ellen Dennis and Kristin Feindel. Page 2 of 28 Maine Department of Environmental Protection VRMP 2019 Data Report Acknowledgements & Credits The VRMP would like to recognize the dedication and hard work of all the coordinators and volunteers who participated in the program. 2019 VRMP Volunteers Androscoggin River Watershed Council Androscoggin River (Upper River) Jane Andrews Tyler Ritter Janna Botka Peter Roberts Carol Gowing Becky Secrest Bob Kleckner Jeff Stern Friends of Merrymeeting Bay Androscoggin River (Lower River) Rebecca
    [Show full text]
  • On-Going Construction in 2013 & Projects That Will Carry Forward
    Maine Turnpike Authority DRAFT-As of May 8th, 2013 Greater Portland Area Major Maintenance & Capital Improvement Projects for 2013 & 2014 On-Going Construction in 2013 & Projects That Will Carry Forward Hurricane Road Over Piscataqua River Bridge Repair & Hurricane Road Underpass Bridge Repair – 2013: The Hurricane Road Bridges over the Piscataqua River and the mainline will be closed for up to 12 weeks during the summer of 2013 for bridge joint, bridge deck and substructure repairs. Scott Construction of Falmouth, Maine was awarded a $820,000 contract for this work. Blackstrap Rd Bridge Rehabilitation & Falmouth Interchange Exit 52 Bridge – 2013: Blackstrap Road Bridge will be raised and the existing concrete deck will be replaced. The bridge will be closed from June - November 2013. Exit 52 bridge will also be raised and the existing concrete deck will be partially replaced. The bridge and southbound on and off ramps are expected to be closed for a week in May 2013. The off ramp will remain closed until November. Any necessary detours will be coordinated with the City of Falmouth, the City of Portland, and the MaineDOT. CPM Constructors of Freeport, Maine was awarded a $3.5 million contract for this work. Presumpscot River Bridge Rehabilitation – 2013 (Continued): The bridges over the Presumpscot River on the Falmouth Spur are being rehabilitated with a new concrete deck and other superstructure and substructure repairs. This 18 month project, which began in 2012, will have the Falmouth Spur down to one lane in both directions through fall 2013, though impacts to traffic should be minimal. In 2012, Lane Construction of Bangor, Maine was awarded the $3.2 million contract for this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonpoint Source Priority Watersheds List MARINE WATERS
    Maine Department of Environmental Protection February 2019 Nonpoint Source Priority Watersheds List MARINE WATERS Impaired* Marine Waters Priority List (34 marine waters) Marine Water Area/Town Priority List Reasoning Anthoine Creek & Cove South Portland Negative Water Quality Indicators (FOCB) Broad Cove Cushing DMR/NPS Threat Bunganuc Creek Brunswick CBEP Priority Water Cape Neddick River York MS4 Priority Water Churches Rock So. Thomaston DMR/NPS Threat Egypt Bay Hancock/Franklin DMR/NPS Threat Goosefare Bay Kennebunkport MHB Priority Water, MS4 Priority Water Harpswell Cove Brunswick CBEP Priority Water Harraseeket River Freeport DMR/NPS Threat Hutchins Cove Bagaduce River / DMR/NPS Threat Northern Bay (Penobscot) Hyler Cove Cushing DMR/NPS Threat Kennebunk River Kennebunk MHB Priority Water Little River and Bay Freeport CBEP Priority Water Littlefield Cove Bagaduce River / DMR/NPS Threat Northern Bay (Penobscot) Maquoit Bay Brunswick CBEP Priority Water Martin Cove Lamoine DMR/NPS Threat Medomak River Estuary Waldoboro DMR/NPS Threat Mill Cove South Portland Negative Water Quality Indicators Mill Pond/Parker Head Phippsburg DMR/NPS Threat Mussell Cove Falmouth CBEP Priority Water, DMR/NPS Threat North Fogg Point Freeport CBEP Priority Water Northeast Creek Bar Harbor DMR/NPS Threat Oakhurst Island Harpswell CBEP Priority Water Ogunquit River Estuary Ogunquit MHB Priority Water, DMR/NPS Threat Pemaquid River Bristol DMR/NPS Threat Salt Pond Blue Hill/Sedgwick DMR/NPS Threat, MERI Scarborough River Estuary Scarborough DMR/NPS Threat Spinney Creek Eliot MS4 Priority Water, Negative Water Quality Indicators Spruce Creek Kittery MS4 Priority Water, Negative Water Quality Indicators Page 1 of 2 MDEP NPS Priority Watersheds List – MARINE WATERS February 2019 Marine Water Area/Town Priority List Reasoning Spurwink River Scarborough MHB Priority Water, DMR/NPS Threat St.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 | Page Chief, Endangered Species Division April 5, 2020 National
    Midwest Biodiversity Institute, Inc. P.O. Box 21561 Columbus, OH 43221-0561 Chief, Endangered Species Division April 5, 2020 National Marine Fisheries Service, F/PR3 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 Re: Application for an Individual Incidental Take Permit (ITP) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 – Lower Kennebec River Fish Assemblage Assessment – REVISED July 1, 2020 III. Contact Information Chris O. Yoder, Research Director Midwest Biodiversity Institute (MBI) 4673 Northwest Parkway Hilliard, OH 43026 (614) 457-6000 x1102 [Main] (614) 403-9592 [Cell] https://midwestbiodiversityinst.org/ Fed. Tax ID #31-1559845 Fish sampling in the Lower Kennebec River drainage by MBI has been conducted annually at seven (7) sites in the Lower Kennebec River mainstem since 2002 and at three (3) sites in the Lower Sebasticook River since 2008. MBI conducted the majority of this work as a grantee or contractor to U.S. EPA and the project was covered by 5-year ITPs issued under Section 7 of the ESA since 2010, the most recent of which expired in 2019. The respective Biological Opinions included annual take limits for Atlantic Sturgeon, Shortnose Sturgeon, and Atlantic Salmon and Terms and Conditions based on Reasonable and Prudent Measures for minimizing harm to individual fish and for reporting any incidental takes to NOAA. The history of incidental takes are included with the descriptions of each of the three ESA listed fish species that are known to occur in the Lower Kennebec River system. IV. Species descriptions: Three ESA listed fish species occur in an approximate 17.5 mile reach of the Lower Kennebec River between the Lockwood Dam and Hydropower Project (operated by Brookfield Inc.) in Waterville, ME to the former Edwards Dam site in Augusta, ME and a 3.5 mile reach of the Lower Sebasticook River downstream from the Benton Falls Dam and Hydropower Project (owned by Benton Falls Associates) to its confluence with the Kennebec River in Winslow, ME.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 2:16-Cv-00496-JAW Document 1 Filed 09/28/16 Page 1 of 19 Pageid #: 1
    Case 2:16-cv-00496-JAW Document 1 Filed 09/28/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ______________ ) ) FKT RESORT MANAGEMENT LLC; ) FKT BAYLEY FAMILY LIMITED ) PARTNERSHIP; FRED W. BAYLEY; ) COMPLAINT KATHLEEN M. BAYLEY; THOMAS R. ) BAYLEY; BAYLEY HILL DEER & ) TROUT FARM, INC.; and BAYLEY’S ) CAMPGROUND, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) The United States of America, through its undersigned attorneys, by the authority of the Attorney General, and at the request of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), alleges as follows: I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a civil action commenced under sections 309(b) and 309(d) of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1319(b) and 1319(d), to obtain injunctive relief and civil penalties against FKT Resort Management LLC, FKT Bayley Family Limited Partnership, Fred W. Bayley, Kathleen M. Bayley, Thomas R. Bayley, Bayley Hill Deer & Trout Farm, Inc., and Bayley’s Campground, Inc. (“Defendants”) for the discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States without authorization on property referred to herein as the “Ross Road Site,” located in the towns of Scarborough (Map/Lot Number R086001) and Old Orchard Beach (Map/Book/Lot Number 101/1/16), Maine, and the “Campground Site,” located in the town of Scarborough (Map/Lot Case 2:16-cv-00496-JAW Document 1 Filed 09/28/16 Page 2 of 19 PageID #: 2 Number R087018), Maine, in violation of Sections 301(a) and 404 of the CWA, 33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • \ Maine to Chicago
    VOL. XXXVII NO. 51. MAINE WOODS, P H ILLIP S , MAINE, JULY 15, 1915. PRICE 4 CENT« PHILLIPS WOMAN were seen together on the shc-re of the lake. And such beautiful trout. SEES A MOOSE Husband had written me that I should have some for my dinner the day I came. So that morning he Malcolm Barker Member of Maine went out early and got some beau­ College Band. ties. Two of them after being dressed and cooked when laid on a Id a personal letter received from twelve-inch plate, reached clear Mrs. C. E. Barker about a month ago across and over the side of the she says: plate, and I have had them every “As you see I am here at Howe meal since. We, Mrs. Jose, the book Brook, a place very much like our keeper’s wife, and myself, board at little Redington, on St. Croix Lake, the same place, and we are scon to a beautiful sheet of water about six try our luck with rod, and she miles in length. No carriage drive within five miles, but many trains is also a good shot. each day. As I was coming down The Maine College Band of which from Stockholm Saturday, a distance Malcolm is a member has been chos­ of 67 miles, when .about half-way en to fill the vacancy made by tlie here I heard the engine whistle, resignation of the band from Ban­ blowing short sharp toots. I have gor, which 'being made up of busi­ One of the Finest Appointed Resort Hotels in the State of Maine lived on the P.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Scarborough Annual Report 2009 Scarborough (Me.)
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine Town Documents Maine Government Documents 2009 Town of Scarborough Annual Report 2009 Scarborough (Me.) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs Repository Citation Scarborough (Me.), "Town of Scarborough Annual Report 2009" (2009). Maine Town Documents. 923. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs/923 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Town Documents by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Town of Scarborough Annual Report 2009 In Memory of Blanche M. Cook Scarborough’s oldest resident at 107 and longtime holder of the Boston Post Cane, died on June 7, 2009. Blanche was born on October 13, 1901, in Nashua, New Hampshire. She was the daughter of Joseph & Lillian (Blackstone) Small. The oldest of five children. Mrs. Cook grew up in the Pownal, Maine area until the age of 16. She then moved to Portland. There she lived with an Aunt and worked as a waitress at the Willows Hotel in Prouts Neck of Scarborough. She also worked at Haven’s Candy Kitchen in Portland where she learned to dip chocolate. She married John Cook (of South Portland) on January 18, 1928, in Portsmouth, New Hamp- shire. They had one daughter, Lorraine. The family lived in South Portland until 1947 when they move to their new home on Westwood Avenue in Scarborough. Once their daughter was older Mrs. Cook went to work for Len Libby’s and later on at Libby’s Candies, both of Scarborough, again dipping chocolate.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine DOT Historic Bridge Survey, Phase II Final Report & Historic
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 8-2004 Maine DOT Historic Bridge Survey, Phase II Final Report & Historic Context. 2004 Lichtenstein Consulting Engineers Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Lichtenstein Consulting Engineers and Maine Department of Transportation, "Maine DOT Historic Bridge Survey, Phase II Final Report & Historic Context. 2004" (2004). Transportation Documents. 33. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/33 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maine DOT Historic Bridge Survey Phase II Final Report & Historic Context Free/Black Bridge, Brunswick #0323. Photo Courtesy MHPC. Prepared by Lichtenstein Consulting Engineers August 2004 PHASE II OF THE HISTORIC BRIDGE SURVEY - FINAL REPORT Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................... iv Section I. Methodology for Field Inspection, Research, and Evaluation ...................I-1 Field Inspection ............................................................I-1 Research ................................................................I-2 Determining Eligibility .......................................................I-3 Criteria for Determining Significance ............................................I-4
    [Show full text]