DOCSLIB.ORG

Freedom Flyer, Consent Magazine, and Happened in the Last Three Ontario By-Elections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Freedom Flyer, Consent Magazine, and Happened in the Last Three Ontario By-Elections FREEDOM JULY, 2006 - ELECTION 2007 EDITION #1 - Who Is Frank? - page 7 FLYER Ontario By-elections - page 10 BILLBOARD Campaign - page 4 #37 - THE OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE FREEDOM PARTY OF ONTARIO BILLBOARDS ANNOUNCE Fp 2007 ONTARIO ELECTION PLATFORM “The Right Direction 2007...” BOLD VISION, CLEAR POLICIES, FRANK APPROACH DISTINGUISH Fp PLATFORM TORONTO - October 4, 2005 - Exactly two years to the day before the next expected provincial election, Freedom Party’s 2007 election platform was released at a media briefing held at the downtown Strathcona Hotel. The event coincided with Fp’s first-ever launching of a provincial-wide billboard campaign (see pages 4-5) drawing attention to Fp’s key platform issues. Fp PLATFORM TARGETS TAXES, HEALTH CARE, EDUCATION Freedom Party’s full-color Right Direction 2007 Election Platform is a unique political document on every front. It begins with an introduction by Fp leader Paul McKeever which establishes that values are what Freedom Party is really all about: “Freedom Party is a uniquely “WHO IS principled organization formed for and by equally principled individuals (who) hold rationality, ethics, justice, democracy and freedom as values upon which (we) will make no FRANK?” compromise.” For the complete text of this introduction, see page 8. SOLD-OUT Fp The rest of the platform consists of detailed descriptions and color illustrations relating to each plank in the platform: (1) Scrap Ontario’s Income Tax, (2) Legalize Faster Better DINNER a BIG Health Care, (3) Improve Education through Choice, (4) Improve the Supply Of Electricity, (5) Restore Fair Auto Insurance, (6) Scrap Property Taxes, and (7) a final section HIT! - see pg 6 on Budgetting Better Health Care And Education. More details, reactions, and insights follow on the inside pages of this newsletter. {end} 2 Openers... SOME FRANK TALK ABOUT FREEDOM PARTY --- AND FREEDOM GREAT EXPECTATIONS vs NO EXPECTATIONS -Robert Metz {Robert Metz is a founding member and president of the Freedom Party of Ontario} From an objective point of view about every other reasonable (and some disobedience, law breaking, revolution, (namely mine), Freedom Party is the unreasonable) name you could think of and even war.) best political party ever invented. for a political party was already taken Sure, I’m one of the founding members or reserved for official registration. But On a television news broadcast of the party, but I didn’t invent or create no one ever started a Freedom Party. aired almost eighteen years ago, we Freedom Party. Freedom Party has let the media know that Freedom evolved into something Party candidates much larger than any only expected to get one of us individually, “We fought tax increases --- and won. We one or two percent thanks to the work, fought government spending on grandiose of the vote, but that support, and wisdom of the important thing people dedicated to the stadium projects and sports events --- and for any new political principle that: won. We fought three entrenched and party to do was to field candidates. I “Every individual, in elected Ontario political parties, each was quoted thusly: the peaceful pursuit of vehemently opposed to Sunday shopping in “There’s the personal fulfillment, element of political has an absolute right Ontario --- and won. credibility. Can you to his or her own life, But when it comes to Ontario elections, we be electable in the liberty, and property.” still haven’t won one yet.” immediate future? Well that’s something I had no idea, in that when we started 1984 when Freedom this party we knew Party was founded, just where that I didn’t expect that. (Today I would be at least a decade or two away. moral proposition would lead us. But know why, but that’s the subject of Credibility in an election is (totally I had expectations. another story.) different from what most expect). It isn’t related to your ideas - directly - Only a few years earlier, and However, there’s one thing I it’s related more to the credibility of the when I was well into my late twenties, did expect from the very beginning, organization behind the ideas, and its I was vaguely aware that something an expectation that might deter most consistency, and its ability to be there was seriously wrong with the way we from getting involved with a new election after election.” (November were being governed. But like so many political party. Then, as today, I fully 3, 1988 - Behind The News - Ch10 others, I was a political illiterate, not understood the enormity of the the London Ontario; you can see the entire knowing the difference between left, task before us --- and its necessity. We video clip available on line) right, center, or which of Ontario’s were, and still are, pioneers on a road political parties fit into which color never travelled --- one away from more Since the very beginning, of the political spectrum. (They’re government control, higher taxes, ever- Freedom Party has consistently all ‘red’.) I do recall, however, my increasing government spending, and increased its number of candidates absolute astonishment, in a country less of everything else. in each successive election, starting that supposedly holds freedom as with three in 1985 and reaching two its highest ideal and which has sent (Most are tragically unaware that freedom dozen in the last Ontario election. But its soldiers to die “for freedom”, to has never been won within a majority rule even fielding a full slate of candidates, process, which always moves away from though discover that no political party or group freedom towards tyranny. Historically, (cont’d on next page...) wanted the name Freedom Party. Just freedom was always won by civil 3 (...cont’d from prev page) They’ve all got it wrong. Whether true or not, and most are not, none of necessary, is not enough to reach these things are relevant to the goal of critical mass, the tipping point, the getting elected. time at which Freedom Party will be perceived as an ‘overnight success’ and The early vote totals of any new elect its first member to the legislature. political party will tell you nothing about that party other than the fact that Today, we have the best platform a candidate was fielded in the riding. ever offered by a political party, an informed, educated and articulate party leader, Paul McKeever, who can out- SOME FRANK TALK ABOUT Freedom Party President debate any of the other party leaders on GETTING ELECTED: Robert Metz any of the major issues. of philosophy, policy, or direction. Moreover, we have a track record The inertia of incumbency and voter Almost nothing. Philosophy and policy of effective education and lobby efforts loyalty is difficult for most to appreciate are important for other reasons, but not which are documented for all to see and requires a clear context and directly for getting elected. in our past newsletters and on line: perspective. Given my corporate and We fought tax increases --- and won. business background and experience, If I just wanted to ‘get elected,’ I We fought government spending on I already knew, some eighteen years probably could have done so already grandiose stadium projects and sports ago that it would be at least twenty (and so could most of you who are events --- and won. We fought three years before most Ontarians could even reading this), by running for one of the entrenched and elected Ontario political say they’ve heard of Freedom Party, two most ‘electable’ parties. But my parties, each vehemently opposed to let alone feel confident in voting for getting elected with one of the major S u n d a y the party. parties would not only have destroyed shopping in “Getting elected has little to do Let’s face any ability on my part to work for Ontario --- with what a candidate or party it, in any freedom, but would have forced me to and won. g i v e n actually work against freedom. represents in terms of 20 year B u t philosophy, policy, or direction” p e r i o d , I recall, after my very first election when it p o l i t i c a l speech as a Freedom Party candidate in comes to Ontario elections, we still parties only get four to five meaningful London South (1985), incumbent and haven’t won one yet. ‘kicks at the can’, that is, opportunities Conservative candidate Gordon Walker, to field candidates. This alone should noticing how warmly the audience With electoral returns barely speak to the reality of the time reacted to my message, invited me to reaching 1% for Freedom Party constraints involved in having so few consider becoming a Conservative --- candidates in the recent Ontario by- pathetically short election periods in so right there at the all candidates’ debates elections, it’s easy to believe that long a period of time. in plain sight for everyone to see and Freedom Party is not making any hear. If Walker really liked what I was progress towards its goal of becoming Now here’s something even more saying, he should have been a Freedom an electable party in Ontario. daunting, and probably something you Party candidate, not a conservative. don’t even want to know, but which Everyone has a theory: “You’re is nevertheless an inescapable fact: (OPENERS...cont’d on page 14...) ‘splitting the right’; you don’t field Getting elected has little to do with what enough candidates to form a majority; a candidate or party represents in terms I haven’t seen you in the papers; your candidates aren’t high profile enough; your party’s name is wrong; no one’s ever heard of you; you can’t win; your Freedom Party policies are too extreme; you’re being ‘too frank’ with the public; why bother? Life, Liberty, Property.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freedom Party International
    .J J J .J Freedom Party Life. Liberty. Property. Freedom Party Of Ontario July, 2016 240 Commissioners Road West, London, ant. N6J 1Y1 Phone: (519) 681-3999 e-mail: [email protected] Website: www.freedompartyon.ca Dear Members, Friends and Supporters, Given the uncertainty surrounding persistent threats of a mail strike/lockout, our planned June mailer of your enclosed newsletter was unfortunately delayed. Our July edition of Fp NEWS & Commentary #11 touches upon only a fraction of the events, campaigns and activities in which Freedom Party is currently engaged. So, especially for those of you who may not have been able to keep up with our regular on-line updates, here, in a nutshell, is a brief summary of recent developments: With Ontario's Progressive Conservative Party leader Patrick Brown's announcement that his party's philosophy on climate change and on carbon pricing was no different than that of the other parties in the legislature (see May's Fp NEWS & Commentary #10), FP's campaign for the 2018 Ontario general election was set into motion. Our first official Media Release challenging Ontario premier Kathleen Wynne's plans to phase out natural gas from home heating in Ontario caused a reaction that has yet to dissipate, and will no doubt remain a contentious issue well into the next election. Everything you need to know about these developments is detailed in your enclosed copy of Fp NEWS & Commentary. Of course, Climate Change policies and Ontario's energy cost crisis will be among the leading concerns taking us into the next election.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Party of Ontario, a Fully-Registered Political Party
    I by the 'in the the interests ther group nOt Only ·m at a ured Or nOt H,,,,, an 'O""'''n9 QU''',on, Wh'n w., 'h, "., tIme a PolIticIan promised YOu lower tax"~' Here's an even better One: Wh­ a POlitician' promiserl believed it? Now here's OUr YOu paId lower tal YOU prObably Car Taxes levied by all I isen steadily year by ns have consc onal income -__ e- re taking mOre thar 's pay, not cOUntin( h '.' . hJ0-- "' -'~:".. ..;"',-' . ..... ' . :~:. .:- :: ....:~-: . .. GETTING THE BALL ROLLING :.. OPE ER S by Robert Metz Although t~is is the second issue of Freedom Flyer, it is really the arbitrary regulations the city was about to (and did) impose on our first newsletter that is indicative of a working, functioning retailers of 'sexually-oriented' books and magazines. Mr. political party. Wheable's advice is particularly valuable in helping to establish a Our being a little late in getting it out to you is another definite proper perspective on what action and advocacy is or is not sign of that activity. So much has happened since we launched politically viable within his given political medium: that of Freedom Party from our newly established headquarters in municipal school boards. London last January, that it has had a direct effect on our ability to get this newsletter printed and distributed according to our The object of some of Mr. Wheable's criticism was the advice of originally anticipated schedule. But over the coming months, we Marc Emery, a downtown London businessman and publisher. fully expect to be back on that schedule, now that a lot of the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Political Forum Website: Email: [email protected]
    June 14, 2018 - Vol. 7 No.11 Discussion on Ontario Election Results Discussion on Ontario Election Results • People's Rally on Queen's Park • New Government Lacks Consent of the Governed Despite Majority • Working People Speak Out About Their Concerns • Endorsements of Monopoly-Owned Media - Henri Denis Agenda of the New Government • Transition Begins in Ontario - Enver Villamizar • Champions of Private Interests on PC Transition Team - Mira Katz 23 Years Ago -- From the Party Press • Should the Workers Be Ecstatic That Ontario Is "Open for Business"? - TML Daily, June 13, 1995 For Your Information • 2018 Ontario General Election Province-Wide Results 1 Discussion on Ontario Election Results Saturday, June 30 -- 11:00 am-2:00 pm Queen's Park, Toronto Facebook Forty-two per cent of eligible voters did not cast a ballot in the June 7 Ontario election. Of the 58 per cent that did, 40.49 per cent voted for the PCs and Doug Ford. This is said to be a decisive majority which gives him a mandate to implement the measures he campaigned on. However, the vote that allows the PCs to form the government with 76 out of 124 seats came from only 23.48 per cent of eligible voters. To say this is a majority government tells us something about the state of the electoral system said to be a representative democracy. The NDP becomes the official opposition with 40 seats and 33.57 per cent of the votes cast, representing 19.47 per cent of eligible voters. The Liberals received seven seats and 19.59 per cent of the votes cast, which represents 11.35 percent of eligible voters.
    [Show full text]
  • C~ 'Ils E Ll T" ! ~ T.~1"""'Ritis-T.-It-E-Is
    Consent is a journal of ideas and opinions on individual freedom. Ctmsent If ever there was an example of how willingly so many individuals would sacrifice their fundamental freedoms for a single political objective, then Ontario's newest political party, the Family Coalition Party (FCP), has got to be it. With over 45,000 votes received throughout the 36 ridings in which the FCP fielded candidates during Ontario's 1987 election, the party appeared to have made inroads thought impossible till then --- especially for a so­ called "fringe" party. In some ridings, the FCP drew as much as 7-9% of the votes cast, which often represented half as many of the number of votes cast for a much better known and much more strongly entrenched political party, the Progressive Conservative Party. How was this possible, and what does this mean to the future of politics in Ontario? One advantage the FCP has, as a new party, is its network of pre­ established connections with other Christian-based lobby groups, such as Right to Life, Real Women, and OAAIS (Ontario Association of Alternative and Independent Schools), all of whom have extensive mailing lists. Find out what you should know about the Family Coalition Party and why its influence will have a negative effect on our individual freedoms: ABORTING OUR FREEDOMS The goal of The Family Coalition Party --- by Marc Emery Abortion. Mention the Family Coalition Party to pretations of things like "family anyone who's heard of it, and that's the values" and religion. As a consequence, word that will immediately come to mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution Freedom Party of Ontario
    The CONSTITUTION of the FREEDOM PARTY OF ONTARIO as Amended on November 20, 2005 Section Page PART I: NAME, PRINCIPLE, POLICIES, AND OBJECTIVES 1. Party Name.................................................................................................... 1 2. Idem............................................................................................................... 1 3. Founding Principle........................................................................................ 1 4. Founding Principle not amendable................................................................ 1 5. Policies........................................................................................................... 1 6. Objectives...................................................................................................... 2 7. PART II: DEFINITIONS 2-3 PART III: MEMBERSHIP 8. Eligible persons............................................................................................. 3 9. Applying for Membership............................................................................. 3 10. Conditions stated on application.................................................................... 3 11. Who may distribute applications................................................................... 3 12. Who may receive completed applications..................................................... 4 13. Members to forward applications and fees.................................................... 4 14. Constituency Associations to forward applications
    [Show full text]
  • The Funding of Political Parties in Ontario"
    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 2 Volume 27, Number 1 (Spring 1989) The undinF g of Political Parties in Ontario Keith D. Ewing Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Article Citation Information Ewing, Keith D.. "The undF ing of Political Parties in Ontario." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 27.1 (1989) : 27-91. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol27/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. THE FUNDING OF POLITICAL PARTIES IN ONTARIO" By KEITH D. EWING* I. THE ORIGINS OF THE LEGISLATION .......... 28 A. The Camp Commission Recommendations ...... 29 II. THE ELECTION FINANCES REFORM ACT 1975... 34 A. Registration . ........................... 35 B. Contributions .......................... 37 C. Regulating Campaign Expenses .............. 40 D. Public Funding ......................... 42 E. Enforcement ........................... 45 III. IMPACT OF THE LEGISLATION ON POLITICAL FUND-RAISING .......................... 48 A. New Fund-Raising Techniques .............. 48 B. Changing Patterns of Coiporate Dependence ..... 53 C. FinancialInequality ...................... 57 IV. FURTHER REFORM - BILL 103 ............... 62 A. Political Pressure in Ontario ................ 62 B. Developments Elsewhere in Canada ........... 68 C. The Liberal-NDP Coalition Government ........ 74 V. CONCLUSION: IS FURTHER REFORM POSSIBLE? ............................. 80 A. A Ban on Corporate Contributions? ........... 82 B. The Charteras a Limit to Further Refonn ...... 85 Copyright, 1989, K.D. Ewing. Lecturer in Law, University of Cambridge. Much of the research on which this paper is based was conducted during visits to Osgoode Hall Law School in 1982 and 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Our May 27 Questionnaire
    RESULTS OF OUR MAY 27 QUESTIONNAIRE A proposed airport and the future of the Federal Lands have been an election issue locally – at all levels of government – for over 40 years. And the latest airport announcement was just a year ago! All the more surprising, then, that fewer than a third of the candidates chose to respond to our questionnaire. Too busy? Campaign team dropped the ball? Or is the airport still a hot potato in some quarters, leaving candidates loath to voice an opinion? Who knows? But we can report that all but one of the four main candidates in the Ajax-Pickering riding met at length with us, agreed with our position on the airport, and were supportive of an agricultural future for the Lands. All candidates’ responses can be read below. RESULTS AT A GLANCE Number of ridings canvassed: 7 Number of ridings in which one or more candidates responded: 5 Number of candidates who responded, by party: Freedom: 1 Green: 4 Liberal: 1 Libertarian: 2 NDP: 3 None Of The Above: 0 Progressive Conservative: 1 Trillium: 0 Breakdown of responses: Question 1: Best Option – Pave the Lands or Plant the Lands? Pave the Lands: 0 Plant the Lands: 7 No opinion / Other response: 5 Question 2: Best Job Creator – Airport or Sustainable Food Production and Processing? Airport: 0 Food Production/Processing: 6 No opinion / Other response: 6 Question 3: Best Use of Tax Money – A Pickering Airport or GTHA Transit Upgrades? Airport: 0 Transit: 9 No opinion / Other response: 3 Note: Question #4, directed only to Liberal and PC candidates, went unanswered.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of ELECTION ADMINISTRATION in Canada
    Compendium of ELECTION ADMINISTRATION in Canada by Alain Pelletier with the assistance of Marie-Ève Poulin and Nathalie Nye 1999 Compendium of Election Administration in Canada Contents Part A Introduction Preface Canadian election officials List of references Part B Redistribution Frequency of redistribution Electoral boundaries commission Criteria for determining boundaries Public hearings Submission of the report Procedure of enactment of boundary changes Part C Administration of Elections Chief Electoral Officer Commission on election financing Election officers Staff and payment Part D Registration of Electors Right to vote Register of electors/Permanent list of electors Enumeration Revision Polling day registration List of electors Part E Voting Process Polling division Polling station Polling day Assistance to voters Time off for voting Proxy voting Transfer certificates Mobile poll Advance polls Mail-in/Special ballot Addition of votes i Compendium of Election Administration in Canada Part F Nomination and Registration Right to be a candidate Nomination of a candidate Registration/Authorization of political parties Registration of local associations Registration of third parties Part G Election Financing Contributions Election expenses Disclosure of contributions and expenses Reimbursement of election expenses Annual allowances Tax deductions for political contributions Election advertising Restrictions on opinion polls Broadcasting time Part H Statistics Statistics on the last general election Rates of pay for selected election officials ii PART A INTRODUCTION Introduction PREFACE The Conference of Canadian Election Officials is an annual conference of federal, provincial and territorial election officials, who gather to exchange expertise and knowledge on the administration of elections in Canada. The Compendium of Election Administration in Canada has traditionally been produced for the Conference to support such an exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections Ontario Reports on Transformative Election
    May 14, 2019 Page 1 of 90 C 13 - CW Info May 14, 2019 Page 2 of 90 C 13 - CW Info May 14, 2019 Page 3 of 90 C 13 - CW Info Modernizing Ontario’s Electoral Process Report on Ontario’s 42nd General Election June 7, 2018 May 14, 2019 Page 4 of 90 C 13 - CW Info Legislative Assembly of Ontario Assemblée législative de l’Ontario Office of the Chief Electoral Officer Bureau du directeur général des élections The Honourable Ted Arnott Speaker of the Legislative Assembly Room 180, Legislative Building, Queen’s Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A2 Dear Mr. Speaker, It is my pleasure to submit the post-event report about the June 7, 2018 general election under the Election Act and Election Finances Act. This report offers a summary of election proceedings, and the feedback received and responded to in the general election. In addition, the report contains my evaluation of the alternative voting methods, processes, equipment, and technology that were used during the event. This report also incorporates the requirements of sections 4.1(5), 4.4(11), 44.1(9), 44.2(5), 67.2, and 89 of the Election Act. I have also provided a summary of the reports on accessibility submitted to me by the Returning Officers under section 55.1 of the Act. Respectfully submitted, Greg Essensa Chief Electoral Officer 1 Modernizing Ontario’s Electoral Process May 14, 2019 Page 5 of 90 C 13 - CW Info This page has been intentionally left blank. 2 Modernizing Ontario’s Electoral Process May 14, 2019 Page 6 of 90 C 13 - CW Info Table of Contents Message from the Chief Electoral Ofcer 6 Section 1 – The Journey to June 7, 2018 8 A.
    [Show full text]
  • 633058129179308750 Christop
    By Christopher Twardawa [email protected] To be presented to the Ontario Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform January 2007 Version ONE-070.131 www.ctess.ca www.TwardawaModel.org Any opinion or view presented in the document is that of and only of the author, Christopher Twardawa, and may not necessarily reflect those of any organization he is or has been associated with. Reproduction of this document in whole or in part is permitted, provided the source (Christopher Twardawa and www.ctess.ca or www.TwardawaModel.org ) is fully acknowledged. © Christopher Twardawa, 2007 TwardawaModel.org CTESS.ca Sometimes the simplest solution is the best. Christopher Twardawa Electoral System Solution ii TwardawaModel.org CTESS.ca About CTESS The Christopher Twardawa Electoral System Solution (CTESS) is the creation of its author – Christopher Twardawa and is designed to provide a better electoral system than what Canada and its provinces now have. With the belief that the current system is good but requires improvements, CTESS strengthens it by identifying deficiencies and proposing innovations. Unlike any other electoral system currently in use and which all have tradeoffs, CTESS has no tradeoffs and therefore eliminates the need to change electoral systems as a whole. Christopher first started thinking about this after the 1993 Canadian federal elections, since the results of those elections appeared to him to be inconsistent with how the voters voted. Ten years later in 2003, while still in university, he came up with the current model (the Twardawa Model) which is a simple yet considerate and sophisticated model. It can be applied to any democratic state under the Westminster model of government and similar systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Magazine November 1988
    ':Liberty is ancient,; it is despotism that is new." - :French proverb. November 1988 $4.00 Volume 2/ Number 2 r---;:-----:-------- ...------] I S'Jlltter,,,g ~ I tbe Mytbs of I I MllrX;6111 I I With fully three-fourths ofthe world enmeshed in the I Marxist mythos, no American can afford not to I I understand its underlying ideology. Thomas Sowell, who I has seen the issue from bpth sides (first as adherent, and I later opponent) makes Marxism a fascinating, sometimes I I frightening study. LivelY,lucid and enlightening, Marxism . I will acquaint readers with the facts, and offer fresh I I insights into their history and application to the present. I I·Detailed, point-by-point '• Why Marx's actual • Risk and incentive as spurs to I analysis of Marx as contributions to economic economic development-the I economist, philosopher, theory amount to "virtually issues Marx conveniently I I historian, prognosticator, zero." ignored. I revolutionary...and man. I I • Marx's historical and • The "historical justification'" ·How Marxists speak boldly economic predictions-why theory, and its bloody-and I I "in the name of the workers he made them; why they inevitable-aftermath. I I without their consent [but] in failed. defiance of their contrary • The contradictions-and I I views and actions." • Why "Marxism was-and I remains-a mighty perversions-of Marxist I instrument for the acquisition theory made by Lenin, Stalin, • Whyeven Marx himself and others. I I would disagree with the and maintenance of political I I claims of "good intentions" power." made by his disciples.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Political Parties
    14 | Student Vote Resource 4 Political Parties OBJECTIVE F) Each group selects a leader to interact with the Students will learn about Ontario’s political parties and other leaders and determine what sport to play. research their party platforms. Correct answer: D, B, E, F, C, A KEY WORDS political party, platform, electoral district, party Follow-up discussion: What lesson is to be learned member, party leader, candidate, campaign, slogan, here? What is the benefit to working alongside speech individuals who share the same opinions and interests? Is the final decision fair? QUESTIONS TO BE EXPLORED DURING THIS LESSON • What is a political party? Instruction: 10 min • Why do political parties exist? 1. When a community or large number of people • How do political parties form government? need to get something done, people with similar • Which political parties can you name in Ontario? opinions and interests often form groups and work • What is a party platform? together to achieve their goals. In politics, these groups are called political parties. A political party PREPARATION is made up of people, called party members, who • Verify which parties are running candidates share similar beliefs and goals for their community, in your school’s electoral district city, province or country. Each party also selects (http://www.elections.on.ca). a leader, usually through a vote. In order for the • Collect a variety of campaign literature from the party’s goals to be accomplished, the party must parties running candidates in your electoral district. win an election and lead the government. • Make copies of Worksheet 4.1 and 4.2, if required.
    [Show full text]