DOCSLIB.ORG

Vegetation Community Monitoring Species Composition and Biophysical Gradients in Klamath Network Parks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vegetation Community Monitoring Species Composition and Biophysical Gradients in Klamath Network Parks National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring Species Composition and Biophysical Gradients in Klamath Network Parks Natural Resource Report NPS/KLMN/NRR—2021/2236 The production of this document cost $25,743, including costs associated with data collection, processing, analysis, and subsequent authoring, editing, and publication. ON THIS PAGE Photo of vegetation monitoring crew working in an old-growth redwood site. Photo by NPS ON THE COVER Sampling at Whiskeytown National Recreation Area Photograph by: Sean B. Smith, Klamath Network Vegetation Community Monitoring Species Composition and Biophysical Gradients in Klamath Network Parks Natural Resource Report NPS/KLMN/NRR—2021/2236 Sean B. Smith1, Phillip J. van Mantgem2, and Dennis Odion3,4,† 1 National Park Service Klamath Network Southern Oregon University 1250 Siskiyou Blvd. Ashland, OR 97520 2 U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center Redwood Field Station 1655 Heindon Road Arcata, CA 95521 3 Earth Research Institute University of California at Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, CA 93106 4 Southern Oregon University 1250 Siskiyou Blvd. Ashland, OR 97520 March 2021 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. Data in this report were collected and analyzed using methods based on established, peer-reviewed protocols and were analyzed and interpreted within the guidelines of the protocols. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available in digital format from the Klamath Inventory & Monitoring Network and the Natural Resource Publications Management website. If you have difficulty accessing information in this publication, particularly if using assistive technology, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Smith, S. B., P. J. van Mantgem, and D. Odion. 2021. Vegetation community monitoring: Species composition and biophysical gradients in Klamath Network parks. Natural Resource Report NPS/KLMN/NRR—2021/2236. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.36967/nrr-2284769. NPS 963/175124, March 2021 ii Contents Page Figures.................................................................................................................................................... v Tables ................................................................................................................................................... vii Appendices ..........................................................................................................................................viii Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. ix Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................. x Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 The Klamath Network .................................................................................................................... 1 Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Vegetation....................................................................................................................................... 4 Biophysical Parameters .................................................................................................................. 4 Field Sampling Design .............................................................................................................. 4 Field Sampling Methods................................................................................................................. 9 Data Analyses ............................................................................................................................... 11 Vegetation................................................................................................................................ 11 Non-Native Species ................................................................................................................. 12 Vegetation/Environment Relationships ................................................................................... 12 Gamma Diversity (Total Park and Sample Frame Species Richness). .................................... 12 Beta Diversity (Park and Sample Frame Similarity) ............................................................... 12 Alpha Diversity (Species Richness within Plots) .................................................................... 12 Diversity and Evenness: .......................................................................................................... 12 Results .................................................................................................................................................. 14 Vegetation Description ................................................................................................................. 14 Total Species ........................................................................................................................... 14 Non-Native Species ...................................................................................................................... 18 Biophysical Parameters ................................................................................................................ 20 iii Contents (continued) Page Vegetation/Environment Relationships ................................................................................... 20 Gamma Diversity..................................................................................................................... 22 Beta diversity ........................................................................................................................... 25 Alpha Diversity ....................................................................................................................... 29 Hill’s N1 Diversity and Evenness ........................................................................................... 29 Discussion ............................................................................................................................................ 31 Vegetation Description ................................................................................................................. 31 Biophysical Parameters ................................................................................................................ 31 Non-Native Species ...................................................................................................................... 32 Vegetation Environment Relationships ........................................................................................ 32 Gamma Diversity.......................................................................................................................... 33 Beta Diversity ............................................................................................................................... 34 Alpha Diversity ............................................................................................................................ 34 Diversity and Evenness ................................................................................................................ 35 Future Sampling and Analyses ............................................................................................................ 37 Future Analysis Considerations .................................................................................................... 37 Quantifying Changes in Relative Abundance of Species .......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant List Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail
    *Non-native Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail Plant List as of 7/12/2016 compiled by Tanya Harvey T24S.R3E.S33;T25S.R3E.S4 westerncascades.com FERNS & ALLIES Pseudotsuga menziesii Ribes lacustre Athyriaceae Tsuga heterophylla Ribes sanguineum Athyrium filix-femina Tsuga mertensiana Ribes viscosissimum Cystopteridaceae Taxaceae Rhamnaceae Cystopteris fragilis Taxus brevifolia Ceanothus velutinus Dennstaedtiaceae TREES & SHRUBS: DICOTS Rosaceae Pteridium aquilinum Adoxaceae Amelanchier alnifolia Dryopteridaceae Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea Holodiscus discolor Polystichum imbricans (Sambucus mexicana, S. cerulea) Prunus emarginata (Polystichum munitum var. imbricans) Sambucus racemosa Rosa gymnocarpa Polystichum lonchitis Berberidaceae Rubus lasiococcus Polystichum munitum Berberis aquifolium (Mahonia aquifolium) Rubus leucodermis Equisetaceae Berberis nervosa Rubus nivalis Equisetum arvense (Mahonia nervosa) Rubus parviflorus Ophioglossaceae Betulaceae Botrychium simplex Rubus ursinus Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata Sceptridium multifidum (Alnus sinuata) Sorbus scopulina (Botrychium multifidum) Caprifoliaceae Spiraea douglasii Polypodiaceae Lonicera ciliosa Salicaceae Polypodium hesperium Lonicera conjugialis Populus tremuloides Pteridaceae Symphoricarpos albus Salix geyeriana Aspidotis densa Symphoricarpos mollis Salix scouleriana Cheilanthes gracillima (Symphoricarpos hesperius) Salix sitchensis Cryptogramma acrostichoides Celastraceae Salix sp. (Cryptogramma crispa) Paxistima myrsinites Sapindaceae Selaginellaceae (Pachystima myrsinites)
    [Show full text]
  • NATIVE PLANT FIELD GUIDE Revised March 2012
    NATIVE PLANT FIELD GUIDE Revised March 2012 Hansen's Northwest Native Plant Database www.nwplants.com Foreword Once upon a time, there was a very kind older gentleman who loved native plants. He lived in the Pacific northwest, so plants from this area were his focus. As a young lad, his grandfather showed him flowers and bushes and trees, the sweet taste of huckleberries and strawberries, the smell of Giant Sequoias, Incense Cedars, Junipers, pines and fir trees. He saw hummingbirds poking Honeysuckles and Columbines. He wandered the woods and discovered trillium. When he grew up, he still loved native plants--they were his passion. He built a garden of natives and then built a nursery so he could grow lots of plants and teach gardeners about them. He knew that alien plants and hybrids did not usually live peacefully with natives. In fact, most of them are fierce enemies, not well behaved, indeed, they crowd out and overtake natives. He wanted to share his information so he built a website. It had a front page, a page of plants on sale, and a page on how to plant natives. But he wanted more, lots more. So he asked for help. I volunteered and he began describing what he wanted his website to do, what it should look like, what it should say. He shared with me his dream of making his website so full of information, so inspiring, so educational that it would be the most important source of native plant lore on the internet, serving the entire world.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Or Suitable Plants City of Mccall
    Native or Suitable Plants City of McCall The following list of plants is presented to assist the developer, business owner, or homeowner in selecting plants for landscaping. The list is by no means complete, but is a recommended selection of plants which are either native or have been successfully introduced to our area. Successful landscaping, however, requires much more than just the selection of plants. Unless you have some experience, it is suggested than you employ the services of a trained or otherwise experienced landscaper, arborist, or forester. For best results it is recommended that careful consideration be made in purchasing the plants from the local nurseries (i.e. Cascade, McCall, and New Meadows). Plants brought in from the Treasure Valley may not survive our local weather conditions, microsites, and higher elevations. Timing can also be a serious consideration as the plants may have already broken dormancy and can be damaged by our late frosts. Appendix B SELECTED IDAHO NATIVE PLANTS SUITABLE FOR VALLEY COUNTY GROWING CONDITIONS Trees & Shrubs Acer circinatum (Vine Maple). Shrub or small tree 15-20' tall, Pacific Northwest native. Bright scarlet-orange fall foliage. Excellent ornamental. Alnus incana (Mountain Alder). A large shrub, useful for mid to high elevation riparian plantings. Good plant for stream bank shelter and stabilization. Nitrogen fixing root system. Alnus sinuata (Sitka Alder). A shrub, 6-1 5' tall. Grows well on moist slopes or stream banks. Excellent shrub for erosion control and riparian restoration. Nitrogen fixing root system. Amelanchier alnifolia (Serviceberry). One of the earlier shrubs to blossom out in the spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Open As a Single Document
    Cercis: The Redbuds by KENNETH R. ROBERTSON One of the few woody plants native to eastern North America that is widely planted as an ornamental is the eastern redbud, Cercis canadensis. This plant belongs to a genus of about eight species that is of interest to plant geographers because of its occurrence in four widely separated areas - the eastern United States southwestward to Mexico; western North America; south- ern and eastern Europe and western Asia; and eastern Asia. Cercis is a very distinctive genus in the Caesalpinia subfamily of the legume family (Leguminosae subfamily Caesalpinioi- - deae). Because the apparently simple heart-shaped leaves are actually derived from the fusion of two leaflets of an evenly pinnately compound leaf, Cercis is thought to be related to -~auhinic~, which includes the so-called orchid-trees c$~~ cultivated in tropical regions. The leaves of Bauhinia are usu- ally two-lobed with an apical notch and are made up of clearly ~ two partly fused leaflets. The eastern redbud is more important in the garden than most other spring flowering trees because the flower buds, as well as the open flowers, are colorful, and the total ornamental season continues for two to three weeks. In winter a small bud is found just above each of the leaf scars that occur along the twigs of the previous year’s growth; there are also clusters of winter buds on older branches and on the tree trunks (Figure 3). In early spring these winter buds enlarge (with the excep- tion of those at the tips of the branches) and soon open to re- veal clusters of flower buds.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • National Wetlands Inventory Map Report for Quinault Indian Nation
    National Wetlands Inventory Map Report for Quinault Indian Nation Project ID(s): R01Y19P01: Quinault Indian Nation, fiscal year 2019 Project area The project area (Figure 1) is restricted to the Quinault Indian Nation, bounded by Grays Harbor Co. Jefferson Co. and the Olympic National Park. Appendix A: USGS 7.5-minute Quadrangles: Queets, Salmon River West, Salmon River East, Matheny Ridge, Tunnel Island, O’Took Prairie, Thimble Mountain, Lake Quinault West, Lake Quinault East, Taholah, Shale Slough, Macafee Hill, Stevens Creek, Moclips, Carlisle. • < 0. Figure 1. QIN NWI+ 2019 project area (red outline). Source Imagery: Citation: For all quads listed above: See Appendix A Citation Information: Originator: USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office Publication Date: 2017 Publication place: Salt Lake City, Utah Title: Digital Orthoimagery Series of Washington Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital data Other_Citation_Details: 1-meter and 1-foot, Natural Color and NIR-False Color Collateral Data: . USGS 1:24,000 topographic quadrangles . USGS – NHD – National Hydrography Dataset . USGS Topographic maps, 2013 . QIN LiDAR DEM (3 meter) and synthetic stream layer, 2015 . Previous National Wetlands Inventories for the project area . Soil Surveys, All Hydric Soils: Weyerhaeuser soil survey 1976, NRCS soil survey 2013 . QIN WET tables, field photos, and site descriptions, 2016 to 2019, Janice Martin, and Greg Eide Inventory Method: Wetland identification and interpretation was done “heads-up” using ArcMap versions 10.6.1. US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping contractors in Portland, Oregon completed the original aerial photo interpretation and wetland mapping. Primary authors: Nicholas Jones of SWCA Environmental Consulting. 100% Quality Control (QC) during the NWI mapping was provided by Michael Holscher of SWCA Environmental Consulting.
    [Show full text]
  • Steciana Doi:10.12657/Steciana.020.004 ISSN 1689-653X
    2016, Vol. 20(1): 21–32 Steciana doi:10.12657/steciana.020.004 www.up.poznan.pl/steciana ISSN 1689-653X ANATOMICAL STUDY OF CORNUS MAS L. AND CORNUS OFFICINALIS SEIB. ET ZUCC. (CORNACEAE) ENDOCARPS DURING THEIR DEVELOPMENT MARIA MOROZOWSKA, ILONA WYSAKOWSKA M. Morozowska, I. Wysakowska, Department of Botany, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71 C, 60-625 Poznań, Poland, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] (Received: June 17, 2015. Accepted: October 20, 2015) ABSTRACT. Results of anatomical studies on the developing endocarps of Cornus mas and C. officinalis are pre- sented. Formation of an endocarp and anatomical changes in its structure from the flowering stage to fully developed fruits were observed with the use of LM and SEM. In the process of anatomical development of endocarps the formation of two layers, i.e. the inner and the outer endocarp, was observed. Changes in their anatomical structure consisted in a gradual thickening of cell walls and their lignification. The ligni- fication of endocarp cell walls begins in the inner endocarp, it proceeds in the outside parts of the outer endocarp, with an exception of several layers of cells forming the transition zone (circular strand) present on its margin, and finally, almost at the same time, in the rest of the outer endocarp. Cell walls of the cells distinguishing the germinating valves undergo thickening delayed by several days in comparison to other endocarp cells. Thickening of their cell walls starts in cells situated close to the inner endocarp and proceeds to its outer parts, and their lignification is not very intensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Garden Quarterly
    ROCK GARDEN QUARTERLY VOLUME 53 NUMBER 1 WINTER 1995 COVER: Aquilegia scopulorum with vespid wasp by Cindy Nelson-Nold of Lakewood, Colorado All Material Copyright © 1995 North American Rock Garden Society ROCK GARDEN QUARTERLY BULLETIN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN ROCK GARDEN SOCIETY formerly Bulletin of the American Rock Garden Society VOLUME 53 NUMBER 1 WINTER 1995 FEATURES Alpine Gesneriads of Europe, by Darrell Trout 3 Cassiopes and Phyllodoces, by Arthur Dome 17 Plants of Mt. Hutt, a New Zealand Preview, by Ethel Doyle 29 South Africa: Part II, by Panayoti Kelaidis 33 South African Sampler: A Dozen Gems for the Rock Garden, by Panayoti Kelaidis 54 The Vole Story, by Helen Sykes 59 DEPARTMENTS Plant Portrait 62 Books 65 Ramonda nathaliae 2 ROCK GARDEN QUARTERLY VOL. 53:1 ALPINE GESNERIADS OF EUROPE by Darrell Trout J. he Gesneriaceae, or gesneriad Institution and others brings the total family, is a diverse family of mostly Gesneriaceae of China to a count of 56 tropical and subtropical plants with genera and about 413 species. These distribution throughout the world, should provide new horticultural including the north and south temper• material for the rock garden and ate and tropical zones. The 125 genera, alpine house. Yet the choicest plants 2850-plus species include terrestrial for the rock garden or alpine house and epiphytic herbs, shrubs, vines remain the European genera Ramonda, and, rarely, small trees. Botanically, Jancaea, and Haberlea. and in appearance, it is not always easy to separate the family History Gesneriaceae from the closely related The family was named for Konrad Scrophulariaceae (Verbascum, Digitalis, von Gesner, a sixteenth century natu• Calceolaria), the Orobanchaceae, and ralist.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.4 Biological Resources
    4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION This section describes the existing biological resources that occur or have the potential to occur within the Project Area and vicinity. In addition, a description of applicable regulations is provided. The analysis evaluates the potential impacts to biological resources that could occur in association with the development of property in the commercial districts and the implementation of the Mobility Element. The Land Use Element/Zoning Code Amendments would modify the development regulations and no specific projects are proposed at this time. Likewise, the roadway and trail alignments are conceptual in nature. Therefore, the analysis is evaluated at a program‐level. With a programmatic study, such as this EIR, subsequent projects carried out under the proposed Land Use Element/ Zoning Code Amendments and Mobility Element Update may warrant site specific biological assessments and surveys once plans have been prepared. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING a. Regulatory Framework As part of the proposed Project’s review and approval there are a number of performance criteria and standard conditions that must be met. These include compliance with all of the terms, provisions, and requirements of applicable laws that relate to Federal, State, and local regulating agencies for impacts to biological resources. The following provides an overview of the applicable regulations with regard to the biological resources that may be present within the Project Area. (1) Federal (a) Migratory Bird Treaty Act The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) protects individuals as well as any part, nest, or eggs of any bird listed as migratory. In practice, Federal permits issued for activities that potentially impact migratory birds typically have conditions that require pre‐disturbance surveys for nesting birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Phyllodoce Glanduliflora Yellow Mountainheath (Ericaceae)
    68Plant Propagation Protocol for [Phyllodoce glanduliflora] ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production Protocol URL: https://courses.washington.edu/esrm412/protocols/PHGL6.PDF Washington distribution North America distribution TAXONOMY Plant Family Scientific Name Ericaceae Common Name Heath family Species Scientific Name Scientific Name Phyllodoce glanduliflora (hook.) Coville yellow mountainheath (1) Varieties Phyllodoce aleutica (Spreng.) A. Heller ssp. glanduliflora (Hook.) Hultén (1) Sub-species N/A Cultivar Phyllodoce empetriformis (pink mountain heather) Phyllodoce caerula (purple mountain heather) Phyllodoce breweri (brewer’s mountain-heather) (1) Common Synonym(s) Menziesia glanduliflora Hook. Phyllodoce aleutica (Spreng.) Heller Phyllodoce aleutica (Spreng.) Heller ssp. glanduliflora(Hook.) Hultén (1) Common Name Yellow mountain heath (1) Species Code (as per PHGL6 (1) USDA Plants database) GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical range Alaska, Canada, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming. (7) Ecological distribution Dry to moist open forest, meadows, upper montane to alpine zones. (7) Climate and elevation Found at high elevations ranging from Alaska, British Columbia to Oregon range and Wyoming.(7) Local habitat and Common at higher elevations. (2) abundance Plant strategy type / Stress-tolerator. (2) successional stage Plant characteristics Low-growing shrub with mulch-branched erect stems from 4-15 in. tall and the alternating evergreen leaves are small and needle-like and grow to less than 1 in long. The edges of the leaves have tiny glands, and the underside of the leaves are grooved. The yellow flowers are distinguishing feature of yellow mountain- heather; they are pale yellow to greenish, urn-shapes at less than 1 cm. Both flowers and stalks are sticky and hairy. (7) (4) PROPAGATION DETAILS Ecotype N/A Propagation Goal Plants Propagation Method Seeds Product Type Plants Stock Type Seeds Time to Grow 1 year Target Specifications Seeds Propagule Collection Seed collection should occur from late summer to early fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Lewis and Clark National Historic Park Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NCCN/NRR—2012/597 ON THE COVER Benson Beach, Cape Disappointment State Park Photograph by: Lindsey Koepke Wise Lewis and Clark National Historic Park Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NCCN/NRR—2012/597 James S. Kagan, Eric M. Nielsen, Matthew D. Noone, Jason C. van Warmerdam, and Lindsey K. Wise Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Institute for Natural Resources – Portland Portland State University P.O. Box 751 Portland, OR 97207 Gwen Kittel NatureServe 4001 Discovery Dr., Suite 2110 Boulder, CO 80303 Catharine Copass National Park Service North Coast and Cascades Network Olympic National Park 600 E. Park Avenue Port Angeles, WA 98362 December 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Horse Rock Ridge Douglas Goldenberg Eugene District BLM, 2890 Chad Drive, Eugene, OR 97408-7336
    Horse Rock Ridge Douglas Goldenberg Eugene District BLM, 2890 Chad Drive, Eugene, OR 97408-7336 Fine-grained basaltic dikes resistant to weathering protrude from the surrounding terrain in Horse Rock Ridge RNA. Photo by Cheshire Mayrsohn. he grassy balds of Horse Rock Ridge Research Natural Area defined by their dominant grass species: blue wildrye (Elymus glaucus), (RNA) are found on ridges and south-facing slopes within Oregon fescue (Festuca roemeri), and Lemmon’s needlegrass Tthe Douglas fir forest of the Coburg Hills. These natural (Achnatherum lemmonii)/hairy racomitrium moss (Racomitrium grasslands in the foothills of the Cascades bordering the southern canescens) (Curtis 2003). Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and Willamette Valley have fascinated naturalists with their contrast to western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) dominate the forest, with an the surrounding forests. The RNA was established to protect these understory of Cascade Oregon grape (Berberis nervosa), salal meadows which owe their existence to thin soils associated with (Gaultheria shallon), and creeping snowberry (Symphoricarpos mollis). rock outcroppings. Surrounding old growth forest adds to the value The 378-acre RNA is located in Linn County, Section 1 of the Natural Area. Township 15 South Range 2 West, on land administered by the The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) recognized the site’s BLM Eugene District. A portion of the meadow extends onto botanical, wildlife, and scenic values by establishing it as an RNA/ adjacent Weyerhaeuser private land. The Nature Conservancy has ACEC in June 1995 (Eugene District Resource Management Plan recently acquired a conservation easement on 45 acres of the Weyer- 1995). It had previously been established as an Area of Critical haeuser property, providing protection for the rocky bald and a Environmental Concern (ACEC) in 1984.
    [Show full text]