DOCSLIB.ORG

Thursday, June 7, 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CANADA VOLUME 137 S NUMBER 074 S 1st SESSION S 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, June 7, 2001 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 4751 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, June 7, 2001 The House met at 10 a.m. Veterans Affairs presented to the House on Tuesday, March 20, be concurred in. _______________ It is with mixed emotions that I rise today to speak to this motion Prayers as it concerns an issue very much in the minds of all Canadians. _______________ The procurement process to replace the Sea King helicopters is one that we have followed for some time but that has only recently seized the attention of the House of Commons. ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS It was last May 18 that my colleague, the hon. member for Compton—Stanstead, raised the prospect of this government using D (1005) the contract for political means. At that time, and then an opposi- [Translation] tion member, my colleague, suggested that the government had a secret agenda, an agenda that involved a specific company. The INTERPARLIAMENTARY DELEGATIONS government said that my colleague’s claims were laughable. The government said that there was no plan to place one competitor Mr. Bernard Patry (Pierrefonds—Dollard, Lib.): Mr. Speak- above another. er, pursuant to Standing Order 34, I have the honour to table in the House, in both official languages, the report of the Canadian Only three months ago the government introduced a procure- section of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Francophonie, as ment process that was biased in favour of one company only. The well as the related financial report. process introduced called for the lowest price compliant bid to win the day, not taking into account whatsoever fleet commonality or, The report concerns the meeting of political committee held at more important, better value. This was when the treasury board’s Port-Louis, Republic of Mauritius, from May 10 to 12, 2001. own guidelines specifically urged all government departments to abide by a best value criteria when launching a procurement * * * process. [English] D (1010 ) COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE I have been told that in the strict legal interpretation of Treasury SCRUTINY OF REGULATIONS Board guidelines 9.1.1 and 9.1.2, no laws have been broken. However I must ask a question. Why did the government choose to Mr. Werner Schmidt (Kelowna, Canadian Alliance): Mr. avoid the generally accepted practices that have guided our mili- Speaker, it is my pleasure to present to the House pursuant to tary purchases in the past? Standing Order 123(1), in both official languages, the second report of the Standing Joint Committee on Scrutiny of Regulations No matter whether it was a Liberal or Conservative government concerning the revocation of section 58 of the Fresh Fruit and in the past, it never followed those types of guidelines. We have Vegetable Regulations, C.R.C. 1978, c.285. The text of the relevant been told that it was to expand the number of Canadian bidders. Yet section of the regulations is contained in this report. in retrospect it is clear that only one wholly owned Canadian company is in serious competition for any of the related contracts. NATIONAL DEFENCE AND VETERANS AFFAIRS That takes me to the second problem I have with this contract, Mrs. Elsie Wayne (Saint John, PC): Mr. Speaker, I move that which is the fact that the government chose to split the contract into the first report of the Standing Committee on National Defence and two parts, one for the basic vehicle and another for the critical 4752 COMMONS DEBATES June 7, 2001 Routine Proceedings mission systems. If I wanted to play politics with this one, like D (1015 ) some of my colleagues are, I would vote for that because it would create some jobs in the province of New Brunswick. What makes this issue so important to us all is that the helicopters currently in use are so dangerous. Some of the pilots When I was taken out to dinner by the company I said that I have already lost their lives, just outside my city. Some of the would only have a bowl of soup because no one buys me with parents of the pilots came to see me. They asked me to take up their dinner. No one buys me with anything. To this date, no one does. I cause and force the government’s hand in this regard. guarantee that. The Sea Kings have given yeoman service to this country for I want to also say right here and now that when it comes to the almost 40 years, and they have earned their retirement. I have great men and women who wear uniforms, we should take the politics compassion for the men and women in uniform who must use the out of it. We should give them the tools to do their jobs. Sea Kings on a daily basis. I am not an engineer. I do not have a full appreciation of the The Minister of National Defence has repeatedly said that unsafe technical difficulties that might come to pass as a result of buying helicopters will not fly, but cannot explain why our choppers go two independent products. However we all know the reason this is down in places like Hawaii, East Timor, and even on the coast of being done. It is for political reasons because in 1993 the govern- Nova Scotia. If we cannot predict when a Sea King is safe, how ment of the day cancelled the EH-101 and wasted $800 million. then do we know which ones to fly? How can the minister make this guarantee? From what we have been told, this is the first such split contract of its kind since the House of Commons has been in place. The At the end of the day, I believe the Minister of National Defence assistant deputy minister responsible said that this was the first of and the Minister of Public Works and Government Services will its kind, which seems to me to be a very risky proposition. We must have a lot to answer for in this process. I believe the Canadian give our Canadian Armed Forces the best equipment to do their people are sick and tired of the government playing politics when it jobs, not only because it is the right thing to do but because we give should be watching the backs of our Canadian forces personnel and them complicated tasks that always put them in harm’s way. doing what is right for them. I am unsure of the ethical or moral reasons that we would put in When I was mayor of Saint John I did a number of major capital place a procurement process that would buy the cheapest helicopter purchases, so I can speak with some experience when I say that this but not necessarily the best. I have for some time asked the contract process is wrong. It is unfair and places bidders at a government to reconsider the procurement process. One potential significant disadvantage. Whenever we have the public challenges bidder, E.H. Industries Ltd., has gone to the length of filing a to a procurement process, as we have seen with the maritime complaint with both the Canadian International Trade Tribunal and helicopter program, we know that something is amiss. the Federal Court of Appeal on this matter. The company believes that by facing this competition on the lowest price alone, it is at a significant disadvantage. I am pleased, therefore, that in the next sitting of our parliament the other place will undertake a committee of the whole to review this entire process. I applaud our colleagues in the other place for The House will recall that it was E.H. Industries that manufac- their diligence to duty and their courage. It is my hope that in the tured the EH-101 purchased by the previous government. I am sure consideration of the Sea King and the challenges we face in the House will recall that in the election of 1993, as I have stated, replacing them, we look in the mirror and recognize we have a duty the issue of EH-101 featured prominently in all debates. The House larger than just helping out some of our friends. will certainly recall that the Prime Minister held his pen up high and said that he would purchase no new helicopters. Zero helicop- ters is what was said. Page 30 of the procurement study also refers to the fact that the Government of Canada should convene a national round table on shipbuilding in Canada with a view to establishing a national It seems very strange that the only red book promise that has shipbuilding policy. We brought that report in asking for a national been kept by this government was the one promise that related to shipbuilding policy in June 2000. We said there should be a naval these helicopters. The GST, free trade and a range of other shipyard in Canada where we would build all our navy ships. We promises were quickly forgotten. should not be buying used submarines in London, England, only to find out they cannot float, then pay $800 million to try to get them to float. That is an insult to our men and women in uniform. I hope the government is not choosing to instigate a procurement process that would prejudice E.H.
Recommended publications
  • Thursday, June 4, 1998

    Thursday, June 4, 1998

    CANADA 1st SESSION 36th PARLIAMENT VOLUME 137 NUMBER 68 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, June 4, 1998 THE HONOURABLE GILDAS L. MOLGAT SPEAKER CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue.) Debates: Victoria Building, Room 407, Tel. 996-0397 Published by the Senate Available from Canada Communication Group — Publishing, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa K1A 0S9, at $1.75 per copy or $158 per year. Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1635 THE SENATE Thursday, June 4, 1998 The Senate met at 2:00 p.m., the Hon. the Acting Speaker and extended parents, in recognition of his outstanding work in Eymard G. Corbin in the Chair. the promotion of human equality, family law and social policy. He has also come out in favour of the decriminalization of Prayers. marijuana, and has taken a special interest in the use of drugs in this country and the need to develop a more realistic policy regarding them. THE HONOURABLE DUNCAN J. JESSIMAN Hon. Senators: Hear, hear! TRIBUTES ON RETIREMENT Senator Lynch-Staunton: His passionate interest in the Hon. John Lynch-Staunton (Leader of the Opposition): welfare of veterans derives in large part from the fact that he Honourable senators, I rise to pay tribute to our colleague himself is one, having served with distinction in the Royal Duncan Jessiman, who sits here today for the last time, since Canadian Navy, which he joined in 1942 and left at the end of the tomorrow, June 5, he will reach the mandatory retirement age. war with the rank of lieutenant.
  • Outspoken Liberal MP Wayne Long Could Face Contested Nomination

    Outspoken Liberal MP Wayne Long Could Face Contested Nomination

    THIRTIETH YEAR, NO. 1617 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPER WEDNESDAY, MARCH 27, 2019 $5.00 Senate to ditch Phoenix in January p. 5 The Kenney campaign con and the new meaning of narrative: PCO clerk Budget puts off transition: what pharmacare reform, but Lisa Van Dusen feds say it takes the fi rst p. 9 to expect p. 6 ‘concrete steps’ p. 7 News Politics News Parliamentary travel Tories block some House Outspoken Liberal MP committee travel, want to stay in Ottawa as election looms Wayne Long could face Half of all committee trips BY NEIL MOSS that have had their travel he Conservatives are blocking budgets approved by THouse committee travel, say contested nomination some Liberal committee chairs, the Liaison Committee’s but Tory whip Mark Strahl sug- gested it’s only some trips. Budgets Subcommittee A number of committees have Liberal MP had travel budgets approved by Wayne Long since November have the Liaison Committee’s Subcom- has earned a not been granted travel mittee on Committee Budgets, reputation as an but have not made it to the next outspoken MP, authority by the House of step to get travel authority from something two New Brunswick Commons. Continued on page 4 political scientists say should help News him on the Politics campaign trail in a traditionally Conservative Ethics Committee defeats riding. The Hill Times photograph by opposition parties’ motion to Andrew Meade probe SNC-Lavalin aff air Liberal MP Nathaniel BY ABBAS RANA Erskine-Smith described week after the House Justice the opposition parties’ ACommittee shut down its He missed a BY SAMANTHA WRIGHT ALLEN The MP for Saint John- probe of the SNC-Lavalin affair, Rothesay, N.B., is one of about 20 motion as ‘premature,’ the House Ethics Committee also deadline to meet utspoken Liberal MP Wayne Liberal MPs who have yet to be as the Justice Committee defeated an opposition motion Long could face a fi ght for nominated.
  • Court File No.: CV-18-00605134-00CP ONTARIO

    Court File No.: CV-18-00605134-00CP ONTARIO

    Court File No.: CV-18-00605134-00CP ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: MICKY GRANGER Plaintiff - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO Defendant Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 MOTION RECORD OF THE PLAINTIFF (CERTIFICATION) (Returnable November 27 & 28, 2019) VOLUME II of II March 18, 2019 GOLDBLATT PARTNERS LLP 20 Dundas Street West, Suite 1039 Toronto ON M5G 2C2 Jody Brown LS# 58844D Tel: 416-979-4251 / Fax: 416-591-7333 Email: [email protected] Geetha Philipupillai LS# 74741S Tel.: 416-979-4252 / Fax: 416-591-7333 Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Plaintiff - 2 TO: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT - OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO Crown Law Office – Civil Law 720 Bay Street, 8th Floor Toronto, ON, M5G 2K1 Amy Leamen LS#: 49351R Tel: 416.326.4153 / Fax: 416.326.4181 Lawyers for the Defendant TABLE OF CONTENTS TAB DESCRIPTION PG # 1. Notice of Motion (Returnable November 27 and 28, 2019) 1 A. Appendix “A” – List of Common Issues 6 2. Affidavit of Micky Granger (Unsworn) 8 3. Affidavit of Tanya Atherfold-Desilva sworn March 18, 2019 12 A. Exhibit “A”: Office of the Independent Police Review Director – 20 Systemic Review Report dated July 2016 B. Exhibit “B”: Office of the Independent Police Review Director - 126 Executive Summary and Recommendations dated July 2016 C. Exhibit “C”: Office of the Independent Police Review Director – Terms of 142 Reference as of March 2019 D. Exhibit “D”: Affidavit of David D.J. Truax sworn August 30, 2016 146 E. Exhibit “E”: Centre of Forensic Investigators & Submitters Technical 155 Information Sheets effective April 2, 2015 F.
  • Core 1..176 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 6.50.00)

    Core 1..176 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 6.50.00)

    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 139 Ï NUMBER 015 Ï 3rd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, February 20, 2004 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 857 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, February 20, 2004 The House met at 10 a.m. [English] CORRECTIONS AND CONDITIONAL RELEASE ACT Prayers Bill C-19. On the Order: Government Orders February 13, 2004—the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness—Second reading and reference to the Standing Committee GOVERNMENT ORDERS on Justice, Human Rights, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness of Bill C-19, an act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and the Criminal Code. Ï (1000) [Translation] Hon. Anne McLellan (Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Lib.) moved: INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER OF OFFENDERS ACT That Bill C-19, an act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and The House proceeded to the consideration of Bill C-15, an act to the Criminal Code, be referred forthwith to the Standing Committee on Justice, implement treaties and administrative arrangements on the interna- Human Rights, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness. tional transfer of persons found guilty of criminal offences, as She said: Mr. Speaker, the success of our system depends on reported without amendment from the committee. collaboration, on dialogue and on research based knowledge. It is Hon. Anne McLellan (Minister of Public Safety and Emer- founded on Canadian values, on the rule of law and on respect for gency Preparedness, Lib.) moved that the bill be concurred in.
  • CANADA DEBATES SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Introduction

    CANADA DEBATES SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Introduction

    CANADA DEBATES SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Introduction On June 10, 2003, Chief Justice Roy thing in its power to oppose same-sex Focus McMurtry, Mr. Justice James marriage. Premier Ralph Klein told This News in Re- MacPherson, and Madam Justice Eileen reporters, “If there is a move to sanctify view feature fo- cuses on the debate Gillese delivered a historic judgement. and legalize same-sex marriage as legal, over same-sex After methodically demonstrating how we will use the notwithstanding clause, marriages in Canada’s existing marriage laws vio- period, end of story.” In other words, Canada. In June lated the equality rights of gays and Klein let all of Canada know that he 2003 the Ontario lesbians under the Charter of Rights and was willing to turn to the rarely used Court of Appeal Freedoms, the Ontario Court of Appeal notwithstanding clause of the Charter of ruled that Canada’s marriage laws ruled that Canada’s marriage law Rights and Freedoms to exempt Alberta violated the Char- “demeans the dignity of same-sex from federal legislation having to do ter rights of same- couples” and is “contrary to the values with same-sex marriage. sex couples hoping of a free and democratic society” (The On June 17, federal Justice Minister to marry—echoing Globe and Mail, June 11, 2003). Then Martin Cauchon announced that the previous rulings from courts in B.C. the justices ordered that the definition government would not appeal the and Quebec. The of marriage be changed to “the volun- Ontario court’s decision and revealed decision set off a tary union for life of two persons to the the wording of draft legislation that flurry of debate as exclusion of all others.” They also would allow gay couples to marry.
  • Thursday, April 22, 1999

    Thursday, April 22, 1999

    CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 213 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, April 22, 1999 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 14189 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, April 22, 1999 The House met at 10 a.m. I thank all of my colleagues on the standing committee, from both sides of the House, for the dedication and energy which they _______________ have put into this very important and comprehensive study. Prayers * * * _______________ CANADA FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION ACT Hon. Lyle Vanclief (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS Lib.) moved for leave to introduce Bill C-80, an act to revise and consolidate certain acts respecting food, agricultural commodities, D (1005) aquatic commodities and agricultural inputs, to amend the Cana- dian Food Inspection Agency Act, the Agriculture and Agri-Food [Translation] Administrative Monetary Penalties Act, the Health of Animals Act, the Plant Protection Act and the Plant Breeders’ Rights Act, and to GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS repeal and amend other acts in consequence. Mr. Peter Adams (Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of the (Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed) Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government’s response to nine peti- * * * tions. INCOME TAX ACT * * * Mr. Peter Stoffer (Sackville—Musquodoboit Valley—East- [English] ern Shore, NDP) moved for leave to introduce Bill C-496, an act to amend the Income Tax Act (medical expenses).
  • Computational Identification of Ideology In

    Computational Identification of Ideology In

    Computational Identification of Ideology in Text: A Study of Canadian Parliamentary Debates Yaroslav Riabinin Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G4, Canada February 23, 2009 In this study, we explore the task of classifying members of the 36th Cana- dian Parliament by ideology, which we approximate using party mem- bership. Earlier work has been done on data from the U.S. Congress by applying a popular supervised learning algorithm (Support Vector Ma- chines) to classify Senatorial speech, but the results were mediocre unless certain limiting assumptions were made. We adopt a similar approach and achieve good accuracy — up to 98% — without making the same as- sumptions. Our findings show that it is possible to use a bag-of-words model to distinguish members of opposing ideological classes based on English transcripts of their debates in the Canadian House of Commons. 1 Introduction Internet technology has empowered users to publish their own material on the web, allowing them to make the transition from readers to authors. For example, people are becoming increasingly accustomed to voicing their opinions regarding various prod- ucts and services on websites like Epinions.com and Amazon.com. Moreover, other users appear to be searching for these reviews and incorporating the information they acquire into their decision-making process during a purchase. This indicates that mod- 1 ern consumers are interested in more than just the facts — they want to know how other customers feel about the product, which is something that companies and manu- facturers cannot, or will not, provide on their own.
  • Rediscovering Constitutional Law: Succession Upon the Death of the Prime Minister

    Rediscovering Constitutional Law: Succession Upon the Death of the Prime Minister

    REDISCOVERING CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUCCESSION UPON THE DEATH OF THE PRIME MINISTER Adam M. Dodek* Introduction Canadian legal academics have become mesmerized by the seductive dance of the Charter. Before the Charter■'s enactment in 1982, Canadian constitutional law was a rather arcane subject consisting almost solely of division of powers questions. Perhaps not surprisingly, the pronouncements of esteemed members of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on such exhilarating subjects as grain and margarine failed to capture the hearts and minds of generations of law students or legal academics. As the Bill of Rights proved to be no more than a cruel tease, it took the Charter to make constitutional law respectable, indeed popular, in the legal academy. However, in its excitement to embrace “the new Constitution”, the legal academy has almost wholly abandoned entire areas of constitutional law. Constitutional law consists of more than the coupling of traditional issues of federalism and the newfound infatuation with the Charter. Dicey defined constitutional law as including “all rules which directly or indirectly affect the distribution or the exercise of the Sovereign power in the State.”1 This definition of constitutional law has not shrunk over the years. Peter Hogg defines the subject as “the law prescribing the exercise of power by the organs of a State.”2 Yet like long- lost relatives, whole areas of constitutional law have been forgotten by the current *B.A. (McGill); J.D. (Harvard); S.J.D. Candidate (Toronto). I am most grateful to John Courtney, Judy Dodek, Nicole Goldstone, Richard Goldstone, Henry Molot and Pippa Reybum for reading earlier drafts of this article and providing helpful comments.
  • Social Conservatives and the Boundary of Politics in Canada and the United States

    Social Conservatives and the Boundary of Politics in Canada and the United States

    SOCIAL CONSERVATIVES AND THE BOUNDARY OF POLITICS IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES by James Harold Farney A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by James Harold Farney (2009) SOCIAL CONSERVATIVES AND THE BOUNDARY OF POLITICS IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES James Harold Farney Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2009 Abstract This dissertation investigates social conservative activism in the American Republican Party and in four parties of the Canadian right: the Progressive Conservative Party, Reform Party, Canadian Alliance Party, and Conservative Party of Canada. While issues like gay and lesbian rights and abortion became politically contentious in both countries during the late 1960s, American social conservatives emerged earlier than their Canadian counterparts and enjoyed considerably more success. Understanding this contrast explains an important part of the difference between Canadian and American politics and explicates a key aspect of modern conservatism in North America. The argument developed here focuses on different norms about the boundary of politics held in right-wing parties in the two countries. Norms are embedded components of institutions that codify the “logic of appropriateness” for actors within a given institution (March and Olsen 1989, 160) and both construct and regulate the identities of political actors (Katzentstein 1996). The recognition of norms has been an important development in organizational theory, but one that has never been applied to modern office-seeking parties (Ware 1996, Berman 1998). ii Qualitative case studies establish that many Republicans understood both sexuality and appeals to religion as politically legitimate throughout the period under investigation.
  • Tuesday, February 29, 2000

    Tuesday, February 29, 2000

    CANADA VOLUME 136 S NUMBER 059 S 2nd SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, February 29, 2000 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 4113 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, February 29, 2000 The House met at 10 a.m. House to withdraw my private member’s Bill C-204, which was first introduced in the House in October 1998 and was reintroduced _______________ in October 1999. Prayers This bill sought to extend maternity and parental leave benefits _______________ to a full year. In view of the budget provisions announced last evening, I now ask the House for its consent to withdraw Bill C-204. ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS The Deputy Speaker: Is that agreed? D (1000) [Translation] Some hon. members: Agreed. MAIN ESTIMATES 2000-01 (Order discharged and bill withdrawn) The President of the Treasury Board presented a message read by the Deputy Speaker in which His Excellency the Governor General transmitted the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending on March * * * 31, 2001. [Translation] * * * D (1005) MAIN ESTIMATES 2000-01 [English] REFERENCE TO STANDING COMMITTEES ORDER IN COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS Mr. Derek Lee (Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I am Hon. Lucienne Robillard (President of the Treasury Board pleased to table, in both official languages, a number of order in and Minister responsible for Infrastructure, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, council appointments made recently by the government.
  • Journals 12 1..24

    Journals 12 1..24

    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 37th PARLIAMENT, 3rd SESSION 37e LÉGISLATURE, 3e SESSION Journals Journaux No. 8 No 8 Wednesday, February 11, 2004 Le mercredi 11 février 2004 2:00 p.m. 14 heures PRAYERS PRIÈRE NATIONAL ANTHEM HYMNE NATIONAL STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS DÉCLARATIONS DE DÉPUTÉS Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements. Conformément à l'article 31 du Règlement, des députés font des déclarations. ORAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS ORALES Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Conformément à l'article 30(5) du Règlement, la Chambre Questions. procède à la période de questions orales. DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES INTRODUCTION OF GOVERNMENT BILLS DÉPÔT DE PROJETS DE LOI ÉMANANT DU GOUVERNEMENT Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Conformément aux articles 68(2) et 69(1) du Règlement, sur Saada (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), motion de M. Saada (leader du gouvernement à la Chambre des seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Deputy Leader of the Government in communes), appuyé par M. Bélanger (leader adjoint du the House of Commons), Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Parliament gouvernement à la Chambre des communes), le projet de loi C- of Canada Act (Ethics Commissioner and Senate Ethics Officer) 4, Loi modifiant la Loi sur le Parlement du Canada (conseiller and other Acts in consequence, was introduced, read the first time sénatorial en éthique et commissaire à l'éthique) et certaines lois en and ordered to be printed. conséquence, est déposé, lu une première fois et l'impression en est ordonnée.
  • Core 1..140 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 7.50)

    Core 1..140 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 7.50)

    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 138 Ï NUMBER 045 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, December 13, 2002 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 2667 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, December 13, 2002 The House met at 10 a.m. opposed to other types of investments. If we choose to make the decision, for example, that we want to forbid the investment in certain areas, we ought to make it illegal to invest in certain areas. We ought not to lower the rate of return that the Canada pension plan Prayers earns by restricting it from investing in these areas. These were all proposals that had been made, some of them by the GOVERNMENT ORDERS former minister of finance, the member for LaSalle—Émard, who was the author of the bill. CANADA PENSION PLAN The amendment I am proposing today is designed to eliminate one The House proceeded to the consideration of Bill C-3, an act to of these limitations, the most important of the limitations, upon the amend the Canada Pension Plan and the Canada Pension Plan invested returns that the Canada pension plan can expect to earn Investment Board Act, as reported without amendment from the through its investment board. This is the provision that forbids more committee. than 30% of the moneys invested through the Canada Pension Plan Ï (1000) Investment Board from being invested outside Canada.