DOCSLIB.ORG

Shell International Finance B.V. Royal Dutch Shell Plc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shell International Finance B.V. Royal Dutch Shell Plc INFORMATION MEMORANDUM SHELL INTERNATIONAL FINANCE B.V. (incorporated with limited liability in The Netherlands and having its statutory domicile in The Hague) as Issuer ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC (incorporated with limited liability in England) as Issuer and Guarantor U.S.$25,000,000,000 DEBT SECURITIES PROGRAMME _________________________________________________________________________________________ Arranger BNP PARIBAS Dealers ANZ BARCLAYS BNP PARIBAS CIBC CITIGROUP CRÉDIT AGRICOLE CIB CREDIT SUISSE DEUTSCHE BANK GOLDMAN SACHS INTERNATIONAL HSBC J.P. MORGAN LLOYDS BANK MITSUBISHI UFJ SECURITIES MORGAN STANLEY RBC CAPITAL MARKETS SANTANDER GLOBAL BANKING & MARKETS SMBC NIKKO SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE CORPORATE & INVESTMENT BANKING STANDARD CHARTERED BANK THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND UBS INVESTMENT BANK An investment in Notes issued under the Programme involves certain risks. For information on this see “Risk Factors”. The date of this Information Memorandum is 13 August 2014 Overview of the Programme Shell International Finance B.V. (“Shell Finance”) and Royal Dutch Shell plc (“Royal Dutch Shell”) (each an “Issuer” and, together, the “Issuers”) have established a programme (the “Programme”) to facilitate the issuance of notes and other debt securities (the “Notes”) guaranteed (in the case of Notes issued by Shell Finance) by Royal Dutch Shell (the “Guarantor”). The aggregate principal amount of Notes outstanding and guaranteed will not at any time exceed U.S.$25,000,000,000 (or the equivalent in other currencies). Application has been made to the Financial Conduct Authority in its capacity as competent authority (the “UK Listing Authority”) for Notes issued under the Programme up to the expiry of 12 months from the date of this Information Memorandum to be admitted to the official list of the UK Listing Authority (the “Official List”) and to the London Stock Exchange plc (the “London Stock Exchange”) for such Notes to be admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange’s regulated market. References in this Information Memorandum to Notes being “listed” (and all related references) shall mean that such Notes have been admitted to the Official List and have been admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange’s regulated market. The London Stock Exchange’s regulated market is a regulated market for the purposes of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Directive 2004/39/EC). However, Notes may be issued pursuant to the Programme on an unlisted basis or may be admitted to listing, trading and/or quotation by such other or further listing authorities, stock exchanges and/or quotation systems as may be agreed between the relevant Issuer, the Guarantor (in the case of Notes issued by Shell Finance) and the relevant Dealer (as defined below). The applicable Final Terms and/or applicable Pricing Supplement as the case may be (as defined below) in respect of the issue of any Notes will specify whether or not such Notes will be admitted to listing on the Official List and to trading on the London Stock Exchange (or any other or further listing authority, stock exchange and/or quotation system, if applicable). The requirement to publish a prospectus under the Prospectus Directive only applies to Notes which are to be admitted to trading on a regulated market in the European Economic Area and/or offered to the public in the European Economic Area other than in circumstances where an exemption is available under Article 3.2 of the Prospectus Directive (as implemented in the relevant Member State(s)). References in this Information Memorandum to “Exempt Notes” are to Notes (including Swiss Franc Domestic Notes as defined below) for which no prospectus is required to be published under the Prospectus Directive. The UK Listing Authority has neither reviewed nor approved any information in this Information Memorandum pertaining to Exempt Notes and the UK Listing Authority assumes no responsibility in relation to issues of Exempt Notes. Notice of the aggregate nominal amount of Notes, interest (if any) payable in respect of Notes, the issue price of Notes and certain other information which is applicable to each Tranche (as defined under "Terms and Conditions of the Notes") of Notes (other than in the case of Exempt Notes, as defined above) will be set out in a final terms document (the “Final Terms”) which will be delivered to the UK Listing Authority and, where listed on such exchange, the London Stock Exchange. Copies of each Final Terms relating to the Notes will be available from the registered office of the relevant Issuer and from the specified office set out below of each of the Paying Agents (as defined below). In addition, Final Terms relating to Notes which are admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange’s regulated market will also be available for inspection on the website of the Regulatory News Service operated by the London Stock Exchange at http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/market-news/market-news-home.html. In the case of Exempt Notes, notice of the aggregate nominal amount of Notes, interest (if any) payable in respect of Notes, the issue price of Notes and certain other information which is applicable to each Tranche will be set out in a pricing supplement document (the “Pricing Supplement”). Royal Dutch Shell has been rated Aa1 by Moody’s Investors Service Ltd (“Moody’s”) and AA by Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services Europe Limited (“S&P”). For the purposes of the credit ratings included and referred to in this Information Memorandum, both Moody's and S&P are established in the European Union and are registered under the Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009 (as amended) (the “CRA Regulation”). As such, each of Moody's and S&P is included in the list of credit rating agencies published by the European Securities and Markets Authority's (ESMA) on its website (at http://www.esma.europa.eu/page/List-registered-and-certified-CRAs) in accordance with the CRA Regulation. Notes issued pursuant to the Programme may be rated or unrated. The rating of certain Series of Notes to be issued under the Programme may be specified in the applicable Final Terms (or Pricing Supplement, in the case of Exempt Notes). Where an issue of Notes is rated, its rating will not necessarily be the same as the rating applicable to the Programme, the relevant Issuer or (if applicable) the Guarantor. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to 2 suspension, reduction or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency. Please also refer to “Ratings of the Notes” in the “Risk Factors” section of this Information Memorandum. This Information Memorandum comprises a base prospectus in respect of all Notes other than Exempt Notes issued under the Programme for the purposes of Article 5.4 of Directive 2003/71/EC as amended (which includes the amendments made by Directive 2010/73/EU to the extent that such amendments have been implemented in a relevant Member State of the European Economic Area) (the “Prospectus Directive”).The information contained in this Information Memorandum applies to all Notes (other than Exempt Notes) issued after the date of this Information Memorandum. Each Tranche (as defined below) of Notes will be in bearer form and will be represented upon issue by either a temporary global note (each a “Temporary Global Note”) or, if so specified in the applicable Final Terms, a permanent global note (each a “Permanent Global Note” and, together with a Temporary Global Note, the “Global Notes” and each a “Global Note”). In each case, the Temporary Global Note or the Permanent Global Note, as the case may be, will be deposited (a) in the case of a Tranche intended to be cleared through Euroclear (as defined below) and/or Clearstream, Luxembourg (as defined below), on or prior to the issue date with a common safekeeper (if the Global Note(s) are intended to be issued in new global note (“NGN”) form, as stated in the applicable Final Terms), or a common depositary (if the Global Note(s) are not intended to be issued in NGN form), in each case on behalf of Euroclear Bank SA/NV (“Euroclear”) and Clearstream Banking, société anonyme (“Clearstream, Luxembourg”) and (b) in the case of a Tranche intended to be cleared through a clearing system other than or in addition to Euroclear or Clearstream, Luxembourg or delivered outside a clearing system, as agreed between the relevant Issuer and the relevant Dealer. Interests in a Temporary Global Note will only be exchangeable for interests in a Permanent Global Note or, if so stated in the relevant Final Terms (and subject to such notice period as is specified in the relevant Final Terms), for Notes in definitive form (“Definitive Notes”) on and after the first business day (the “Exchange Date”, which date shall be determined by the Agent (as defined herein)) following the expiry of 40 days after the later of (i) the issue date of the Notes of the relevant Tranche and (ii) the completion of the distribution of the Notes of such Tranche, upon certification as to non-U.S. beneficial ownership. Swiss Franc Domestic Notes (as defined below) will be represented upon issue by a Permanent Global Note and are subject to an exemption from the certification requirements under U.S. Treasury regulations. “Swiss Franc Domestic Notes” means an issue of Notes denominated in Swiss Francs or carrying a Swiss Franc-related element that is cleared through SIX SIS Ltd, the Swiss Securities Services Corporation in Olten, Switzerland, or any successor thereto (“SIS”). Euroclear and Clearstream, Luxembourg will be notified in respect of each Note to be issued in NGN form whether or not is it intended to be held in a manner which would allow Eurosystem eligibility.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Bank Conservation Area Statement 2007 Conservation Area
    South BankSouth Bank Conservation Area Statement 2007 Conservation Area Conservation Area Statement September 2007 South Bank Conservation Area Statement 2007 Conservation Area Context Map This map shows the South Bank Conservation Area (CA 38) in its wider context which includes the following neighbouring conservation areas: - CA 09 Walcot Conservation Area (part only) CA 10 Lambeth Palace Conservation Area CA 21 Roupell Street Conservation Area CA 34 Waterloo Conservation Area CA 40 Lower Marsh Conservation Area CA 50 Lambeth Walk & China Walk Conservation Area CA 51 Mitre Road & Ufford Street Conservation Area 2 South Bank Conservation Area Statement 2007 Conservation Area Boundary Map The maps in this document are based upon Ordnance Survey material with permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised preproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prose- cution or civic proceedings. LB Lambeth 100019338 2007. 3 South Bank Conservation Area Statement 2007 CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 5 1. PLANNING FRAMEWORK 6 2. CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 7 2.1 Purpose and structure of a Conservation Area Appraisal 7 2.2 Historic Development 7 2.3 City Context & Strategic Views 11 2.4 Archaeology 11 2.5 Spatial Form 11 2.6 Streetscape 14 2.7 Permeability 16 2.8 Public Realm 17 2.9 Access 17 2.10 Street Furniture 18 2.11 Public Art 19 2.12 Activity and Uses 19 2.13 Spaces 20 2.14 Built form 21 2.15 Listed Buildings 22 2.16 Locally Listed Buildings 23 2.17 Buildings making a Positive Contribution 23 2.18 Buildings Making a Neutral Contribution 26 2.19 Buildings Making a Negative Contribution 26 2.20 Spaces Making a Positive Contribution 27 2.21 Spaces Making a Neutral Contribution 28 2.22 Spaces Making A Negative Contribution 29 2.23 Important Local Trees 29 2.24 Important Local Views 29 2.25 Signs & Advertisements 30 2.26 Setting of the Conservation Area 31 2.27 Appraisal Conclusion 31 4 South Bank Conservation Area Statement 2007 PAGE 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 River Prospect: Golden Jubilee/ Hungerford Footbridges
    17 River Prospect: Golden Jubilee/ 149 Hungerford Footbridges 285 The Golden Jubilee/Hungerford Footbridges flank the Hungerford railway bridge, built in 1863. The footbridges were designed by the architects Lifschutz Davidson and were opened as a Millennium Project in 2003. 286 There are two Viewing Locations at Golden Jubilee/Hungerford Footbridges, 17A and 17B, referring to the upstream and downstream sides of the bridge. 150 London View Management Framework Viewing Location 17A Golden Jubilee/Hungerford Footbridges: upstream N.B for key to symbols refer to image 1 Panorama from Assessment Point 17A.1 Golden Jubilee/Hungerford Footbridges: upstream - close to the Lambeth bank Panorama from Assessment Point 17A.2 Golden Jubilee/Hungerford Footbridges: upstream - close to the Westminster bank 17 River Prospect: Golden Jubilee/Hungerford Footbridges 151 Description of the View 287 Two Assessment Points are located on the upstream side of Landmarks include: the bridge (17A.1 and 17A.2) representing the wide swathe Palace of Westminster (I) † of views available. A Protected Silhouette of the Palace of Towers of Westminster Abbey (I) Westminster is applied between Assessment Points 17A.1 The London Eye and 17A.2. Westminster Bridge (II*) Whitehall Court (II*) 288 The river dominates the foreground. In the middle ground the London Eye and Embankment trees form distinctive Also in the views: elements. The visible buildings on Victoria Embankment The Shell Centre comprise a broad curve of large, formal elements of County Hall (II*) consistent height and scale, mostly of Portland stone. St Thomas’s Hospital (Victorian They form a strong and harmonious building line. section) (II) St George’s Wharf, Vauxhall 289 The Palace of Westminster, part of the World Heritage Site, Millbank Tower (II) terminates the view, along with the listed Millbank Tower.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia (Including Middle East and Russia)
    22 SHELL INVESTORS’ HANDBOOK 2013 REPORTS.SHELL.COM ASIA (INCLUDING MIDDLE EAST AND RUSSIA) KEY FIGURES 2013 % of total HIGHLIGHTS ■■ Shell is the industry leader in integrated gas Total production (thousand boe/d) [A] 1,197 37% in Asia, with a major LNG portfolio across Liquids production (thousand b/d) [A] 674 48% the region and the world’s largest GTL plant Natural gas production (million scf/d) [A] 3,033 32% in Qatar. Gross developed and undeveloped acreage (thousand acres) 82,722 29% Proved oil and gas reserves excluding non-controlling interest (million boe) [B] 4,509 32% ■■ We are active in our existing heartlands [A] Available for sale. of Malaysia and Brunei, and are [B] Includes proved reserves associated with future production that will be consumed in operations. developing options in China. BRUNEI development of tight gas in varied geological layers ■■ Production in Asia amounted to nearly Shell and the Brunei government are 50:50 of the block. In Sichuan, Shell and CNPC have 1.2 million boe/d in 2013. shareholders in Brunei Shell Petroleum Company agreed to appraise, develop and produce tight gas Sendirian Berhad (BSP). BSP holds long-term oil and in the Jinqiu block under a PSC (Shell interest 49%) ■■ After-tax earnings from the oil and gas gas concession rights onshore and offshore Brunei, and have a PSC for shale-gas exploration, exploration and production operations and sells most of its natural gas production to Brunei development and production in the Fushun of our subsidiaries, joint ventures and LNG Sendirian Berhad (BLNG, Shell interest 25%).
    [Show full text]
  • Shell International Finance B.V. Royal Dutch Shell Plc
    INFORMATION MEMORANDUM SHELL INTERNATIONAL FINANCE B.V. (incorporated with limited liability in The Netherlands and having its statutory domicile in The Hague) as Issuer ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC (incorporated with limited liability in England) as Issuer and Guarantor U.S.$25,000,000,000 DEBT SECURITIES PROGRAMME _________________________________________________________________________________________ Arranger UBS INVESTMENT BANK Dealers BARCLAYS BNP PARIBAS BOFA MERRILL LYNCH CITIGROUP CREDIT SUISSE DEUTSCHE BANK GOLDMAN SACHS INTERNATIONAL HSBC J.P. MORGAN LLOYDS BANK MORGAN STANLEY RBC CAPITAL MARKETS SANTANDER GLOBAL BANKING & SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE CORPORATE & MARKETS INVESTMENT BANKING THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND UBS INVESTMENT BANK An investment in Notes issued under the Programme involves certain risks. For information on this see “Risk Factors”. The date of this Information Memorandum is 15 August 2013 Overview of the Programme Shell International Finance B.V. (“Shell Finance”) and Royal Dutch Shell plc (“Royal Dutch Shell”) (each an “Issuer” and, together, the “Issuers”) have established a programme (the “Programme”) to facilitate the issuance of notes and other debt securities (the “Notes”) guaranteed (in the case of Notes issued by Shell Finance) by Royal Dutch Shell (the “Guarantor”). The aggregate principal amount of Notes outstanding and guaranteed will not at any time exceed U.S.$25,000,000,000 (or the equivalent in other currencies). Application has been made to the Financial Conduct Authority in its capacity as competent authority (the “UK Listing Authority”) for Notes issued under the Programme up to the expiry of 12 months from the date of this Information Memorandum to be admitted to the official list of the UK Listing Authority (the “Official List”) and to the London Stock Exchange plc (the “London Stock Exchange”) for such Notes to be admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange’s regulated market.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual Plate Check Valves Innovation in the Pipeline
    DUAL PLATE CHECK VALVES INNOVATION IN THE PIPELINE www.checkvalves.co.uk Dual Plate Check Valve Range Goodwin International is the market leader in the design and manufacture of Dual Plate Check Valves for use in the world’s hydrocarbon, energy and process Type BR industries. With a track record of supply spanning over 30 years, Goodwin has developed an enviable reputation for quality and reliability of product at internationally competitive prices. Based in the United Kingdom, Goodwin sells internationally exporting to over 50 countries. Through its network of agents and distributors, with some US$ 7,500,000 of inventory in 16 stocking locations worldwide, Goodwin offers outstanding support to its customers listed amongst whom are many of the world’s end users, including oil majors and national oil companies, and national and Type BFR international engineering contractors. Goodwin Dual Plate Check Valves 6 Different Body Styles Wafer (BR) Type BSR Flanged (BFR) Solid Lug (BSR) Buttweld end (BWR) Buttweld end with access (BWA) Hub-ended (BHR) Sizes 2” - 144” (50mm - 3600mm) Pressure Classes ASME 150 - 2500 Type BWR API 2000 - 20000 PN 10 - PN 400 Materials Ductile and Ni-Resist® Irons; Carbon Steels; Stainless Steels; Duplex and Super Duplex Stainless Steels; Aluminium Bronzes; High Nickel Alloys; Titanium. Type BWA Features Designed, manufactured, assembled and tested in accordance with Quality Assurance System accredited by BSI to BS EN ISO 9001. Certifiable in compliance with European Pressure Directive (PED) 97/23/EC and/or ATEX Directive 94/9/EC to meet customer requirements when specified. Designed and tested to API 594.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Outcome of the Iraq War: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq
    The Real Outcome of the Iraq War: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq By Anthony H. Cordesman, Peter Alsis, Adam Mausner, and Charles Loi Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy Revised: December 20, 2011 Note: This draft is being circulated for comments and suggestions. Please provide them to [email protected] Chapter 6: US Strategic Competition with Iran: Competition in Iraq 2 Executive Summary "Americans planted a tree in Iraq. They watered that tree, pruned it, and cared for it. Ask your American friends why they're leaving now before the tree bears fruit." --Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.1 Iraq has become a key focus of the strategic competition between the United States and Iran. The history of this competition has been shaped by the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), the 1991 Gulf War, and the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. Since the 2003 war, both the US and Iran have competed to shape the structure of Post-Saddam Iraq’s politics, governance, economics, and security. The US has gone to great lengths to counter Iranian influence in Iraq, including using its status as an occupying power and Iraq’s main source of aid, as well as through information operations and more traditional press statements highlighting Iranian meddling. However, containing Iranian influence, while important, is not America’s main goal in Iraq. It is rather to create a stable democratic Iraq that can defeat the remaining extremist and insurgent elements, defend against foreign threats, sustain an able civil society, and emerge as a stable power friendly to the US and its Gulf allies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Outcome of Invasion: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq
    a report of the csis burke chair in strategy The Outcome of Invasion: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq Authors Adam Mausner Sam Khazai Anthony H. Cordesman Peter Alsis Charles Loi March 2012 Chapter VII: US Strategic Competition with Iran: Competition in Iraq 16/3/12 2 Executive Summary "Americans planted a tree in Iraq. They watered that tree, pruned it, and cared for it. Ask your American friends why they're leaving now before the tree bears fruit." --Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.1 Iraq has become a key focus of the strategic competition between the United States and Iran. The history of this competition has been shaped by the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), the 1991 Gulf War, the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, and now by the withdrawal of US military forces. It is a competition increasingly shaped by Iraq’s turbulent domestic politics and power struggles, and where both the US and Iran compete to shape the structure of Iraq’s future politics, governance, economics, and security. An Uncertain Level of US Influence The US has gone to great lengths to counter Iranian influence in Iraq, including using its status as an occupying power and Iraq’s main source of aid, as well as through information operations and more traditional press statements highlighting Iranian meddling. However, containing Iranian influence, while important, is not America’s main goal in Iraq. It is rather to create a stable democratic Iraq that can defeat the remaining extremist and insurgent elements, defend against foreign threats, sustain an able civil society, and emerge as a stable power friendly to the US and its Gulf allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketwatch | Refined Products Thursday, June 20, 2019
    MarketWatch | Refined Products Thursday, June 20, 2019 Market Commentary All NYMEX | Prior Settlements Recap: Oil prices shot to the upside after the EIA reported a larger than expected drawdown in ULSD (HO) Prior Settle Change In U.S. crude oil stocks, the first in three weeks. August WTI, which was trading at $53.67 just prior to the release of the report, jumped 86 cents to a midsession high of $54.53 a barrel by Month Close Change One Week 10:37 am EST, while August Brent gained equally as much, to trade at $62.51 a barrel. The Jul-19 $1.8294 $0.0016 $0.0495 inability of WTI to trade above $55.00 and Brent above $63.00 prompted light profit taking, with both WTI and Brent slipping into a period of sideways trading. Oil prices slipped, giving up Aug-19 $1.8356 $0.0010 $0.0486 early gains as market participants await the outcome of the upcoming OPEC meeting, which is Sep-19 $1.8435 $0.0007 $0.0494 slated for July 1-2, and the expected meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and China’s President Xi Jinping, which is set to take place at next week’s G20 summit. August WTI Oct-19 $1.8517 $0.0000 $0.0486 settled at $53.97 a barrel, down 14 cents, or 2.5%, while Brent for August delivery fell 32 cents, Nov-19 $1.8584 -$0.0008 $0.0475 or 0.51%, to settle at $61.82 a barrel. July RBOB rose 1.4 cents, or 0.8%, to $1.736 a gallon.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Weapons and the Iran-Iraq War a Discussion of the UN Security Council’S Response to the Use of Gas in the Iran-Iraq War 1980-1988
    Chemical Weapons and the Iran-Iraq War A discussion of the UN Security Council’s response to the use of gas in the Iran-Iraq war 1980-1988 MA Thesis in History Randi Hunshamar Øygarden Department of AHKR Autumn 2014 2 Acknowledgements I am grateful for the help I have received with this thesis. First of all I would like to thank my supervisor Professor Anders Bjørkelo. He has given me thorough feedback, advices and provided me with new perspectives when I have been lost in my work. I would also like to thank Professor Knut S. Vikør and Dr. Anne K. Bang at the University of Bergen. They have both given me useful inputs and feedback on drafts I have presented at the weekly seminars in Middle Eastern History. I am also very grateful to the staff at the library at the Nobel Peace Prize Institute in Oslo, who has been very helpful in finding primary sources. I would also like to thank Evy Ølberg and Kristine Moe, who have taken their time to proofread and to give comments on the content and structure of the thesis. This MA thesis marks the end of my studies and I would like to thank my parents for not only supporting me in my MA work, but throughout all my years of study at the university. Last, but not least, I would like to thank my boyfriend Mattias for motivation, encouragement and IT-support 24/7. Randi Hunshamar Øygarden Bergen, 20.11.2014 3 4 Table of Content Acknowledgements 3 1. Introduction 7 Research Questions 8 Hypotheses 9 Historiography, sources and methods 11 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Management Plan for the National Theatre Haworth Tompkins
    Conservation Management Plan For The National Theatre Final Draft December 2008 Haworth Tompkins Conservation Management Plan for the National Theatre Final Draft - December 2008 Haworth Tompkins Ltd 19-20 Great Sutton Street London EC1V 0DR Front Cover: Haworth Tompkins Ltd 2008 Theatre Square entrance, winter - HTL 2008 Foreword When, in December 2007, Time Out magazine celebrated the National Theatre as one of the seven wonders of London, a significant moment in the rising popularity of the building had occurred. Over the decades since its opening in 1976, Denys Lasdun’s building, listed Grade II* in 1994. has come to be seen as a London landmark, and a favourite of theatre-goers. The building has served the NT company well. The innovations of its founders and architect – the ampleness of the foyers, the idea that theatre doesn’t start or finish with the rise and fall of the curtain – have been triumphantly borne out. With its Southbank neighbours to the west of Waterloo Bridge, the NT was an early inhabitant of an area that, thirty years later, has become one of the world’s major cultural quarters. The river walk from the Eye to the Design Museum now teems with life - and, as they pass the National, we do our best to encourage them in. The Travelex £10 seasons and now Sunday opening bear out the theatre’s 1976 slogan, “The New National Theatre is Yours”. Greatly helped by the Arts Council, the NT has looked after the building, with a major refurbishment in the nineties, and a yearly spend of some £2million on fabric, infrastructure and equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Dutch Shell and Its Sustainability Troubles
    Royal Dutch Shell and its sustainability troubles Background report to the Erratum of Shell's Annual Report 2010 Albert ten Kate May 2011 1 Colophon Title: Royal Dutch Shell and its sustainability troubles Background report to the Erratum of Shell's Annual Report 2010 May 2011. This report is made on behalf of Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands) Author: Albert ten Kate, free-lance researcher corporate social responsibility Pesthuislaan 61 1054 RH Amsterdam phone: (+31)(0)20 489 29 88 mobile: (+31)(0)6 185 68 354 e-mail: [email protected] 2 Contents Introduction 4 Methodology 5 Cases: 1. Muddling through in Nigeria 6 1a) oil spills 1b) primitive gas flaring 1c) conflict and corruption 2. Denial of Brazilian pesticide diseases 14 3. Mining the Canadian tar sands 17 4. The bitter taste of Brazil's sugarcane 20 4a) sourcing sugarcane from occupiers of indigenous land 4b) bad labour conditions sugarcane harvesters 4c) massive monoculture land use 5. Fracking unconventional gas 29 6. Climate change, a business case? 35 7. Interfering with politics 38 8. Drilling plans Alaska’s Arctic Ocean 42 9. Sakhalin: the last 130 Western Gray Whales 45 10. The risky Kashagan oil field 47 11. A toxic legacy in Curaçao 49 12. Philippines: an oil depot amidst a crowd of people 52 3 Introduction Measured in revenue, Royal Dutch Shell is one of the biggest companies in the world. According to its annual report of 2010, its revenue amounted to USD 368 billion in 2010. Shell produces oil and gas in 30 countries, spread over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Challenges in Post-Conflict Iraq
    ECONOMIC CHALLENGES IN POST-CONFLICT IRAQ Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy, with the assistance of Adam Mausner and Elena Derby March 17, 2010 Cordesman: Iraq - Creating a Strategic Partnership 3/17/10 Page 2 Table of Contents Economic Challenges in Post-Conflict Iraq........................................................................ 4 1. The Costs and Risks of Dependence on the Petroleum Sector ....................................... 6 The Uncertain Status of Oil Export Revenues ................................................................ 6 The Lagging Development of the Petroleum Sector ..................................................... 10 Iraq’s More Recent Oil Deals and Securing Foreign Investment ................................ 14 Uncertain Iraqi Progress in Creating the Right Climate for Investment ..................... 16 Violence and the Lack of Suitable Legal Protection and a Hydrocarbons Law........... 17 Petroleum Security in the North ................................................................................... 20 Petroleum Security in the South.................................................................................... 21 Some Improvements in Investment Laws But More Is Needed ..................................... 21 Developments in Natural Gas....................................................................................... 22 Popular Reactions, Resentments, and the “China Syndrome”..................................... 22 Kurdish-Arab Tensions ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]