Cross-Priming T Cell + Cell Licensing and CD8 Antigen Persistence Is

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cross-Priming T Cell + Cell Licensing and CD8 Antigen Persistence Is Antigen Persistence Is Required for Dendritic Cell Licensing and CD8 + T Cell Cross-Priming This information is current as Hélène Jusforgues-Saklani, Martin Uhl, Nathalie Blachère, of September 26, 2021. Fabrice Lemaître, Olivier Lantz, Philippe Bousso, Deborah Braun, James J. Moon and Matthew L. Albert J Immunol 2008; 181:3067-3076; ; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.5.3067 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/181/5/3067 Downloaded from References This article cites 40 articles, 21 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/181/5/3067.full#ref-list-1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication by guest on September 26, 2021 *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2008 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Antigen Persistence Is Required for Dendritic Cell Licensing and CD8؉ T Cell Cross-Priming1 He´le`ne Jusforgues-Saklani,*‡ Martin Uhl,*‡ Nathalie Blache`re,* Fabrice Lemaître,* Olivier Lantz,† Philippe Bousso,* Deborah Braun,*‡ James J. Moon,§ and Matthew L. Albert2*‡ It has been demonstrated that CD4؉ T cells require Ag persistence to achieve effective priming, whereas CD8؉ T cells are on “autopilot” after only a brief exposure. This finding presents a disturbing conundrum as it does not account for situations in which CD8؉ T cells require CD4؉ T cell help. We used a physiologic in vivo model to study the requirement of Ag persistence for the cross-priming of minor histocompatibility Ag-specific CD8؉ T cells. We report inefficient cross-priming in situations in which male -cells are rapidly cleared. Strikingly, the failure to achieve robust CD8؉ T cell activation is not due to a problem with cross presentation. In fact, by providing “extra help” in the form of dendritic cells (DCs) loaded with MHC class II peptide, it was Downloaded from possible to achieve robust activation of CD8؉ T cells. Our data suggest that the “licensing” of cross-presenting DCs does not occur during their initial encounter with CD4؉ T cells, thus accounting for the requirement for Ag persistence and suggesting that DCs make multiple interactions with CD8؉ T cells during the priming phase. These findings imply that long-lived Ag is critical for :efficient vaccination protocols in which the CD8؉ T cell response is helper-dependent. The Journal of Immunology, 2008, 181 3067–3076. http://www.jimmunol.org/ oth in vitro and in vivo experimentation have defined an It has also been demonstrated that CD8ϩ T cell priming may essential role for Ag-specific CD4ϩ helper cells in the occur following a relatively short exposure to Ag. In infection B cross-priming of CD8ϩ T cells (1–3). This helper activity situations such as Listeria monocytogenes, effective primary CD8ϩ requires that the Ag be present on the same APC that is engaging T cell responses require less than 24 h of antigenic stimulation (7, ϩ the CD8 T cell, much like the carrier effect that had been previ- 8). Similarly, it has been demonstrated in vitro, using monoclonal ously defined for T cell/B cell cooperation (4). This led to the T cells that CD8ϩ T cells given 20 h of stimulus will respond by proposal of three-cell clusters of T cells with APCs, as it could best proliferating extensively and differentiating into effector cells (8, explain the epitope linkage and noncognate requirements of the in 9). This phenomenon was termed an “autopilot” response by by guest on September 26, 2021 vivo cytolytic response. Due to an awareness that the probability Bevan and Fink (10), and distinguishes CD8ϩ T cell activation of such interactions would be rare as a result of the low pre- from the regulation of CD4ϩ T cell priming (11–13). Indeed, re- cursor frequency of naive T cells and the scarcity of Ag-loaded cent experiments from Obst et al. (14) demonstrated that CD4ϩ T APCs, this model gave way to what is commonly referred to as cell proliferation requires cognate stimulation throughout their ex- ϩ the “serial two-cell” model. Accordingly, CD4 T cells “li- pansion phase. These results raise a paradox regarding the priming 3 ϩ cense” dendritic cells (DCs) that in turn prime CD8 T cells. of helper-dependent CD8ϩ T cell responses: what happens if the This terminology was first introduced by Lanzavecchia (5), fol- DC makes contact with an Ag-specific CD8ϩ T cell before it is ϩ lowing from three studies that support the role of CD4 T cells “licensed?” The current model suggests that it would be tolerized, offering activation signals to the APC that permit them to prime even though the cognate helper cell may be present in the reper- ϩ CD8 T cells (2, 3, 6). toire, albeit late in getting to the Ag-loaded DCs. Moreover, the concept that DCs are licensed by CD4ϩ T cells during their initial encounter does not account for the need to first prime the CD4ϩ T *Immunology Department, Institut Pasteur, †Institut Curie, ‡Institut National de la cell and induce surface expression of CD40L, a critical molecule Sante´ et de la Recherche Me´dicale Unite´ 818, Paris France; and §Department of for DC activation. Immunology, University of Minnesota, MN 55455 To evaluate the requirement for Ag persistence during helper- Received for publication April 7, 2008. Accepted for publication June 25, 2008. dependent cross-priming and address the timing of DC licensing, The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page we studied responses in female mice to the male Ag HY uty pep- charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. tide, which has the minor histocompatibility locus of Y chromo- 1 some in ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat gene uty. This work was supported in part by grants from Mildred Scheel Stipendium Deut- ϩ sche Krebshilfe e.V. (to M.U.), La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, L’Agence´ In this model, CD8 T cells that recognize the uty peptide pre- Nationale de la Re´cherche, and The European Young Investigator Awards Scheme, sented by H-2Db are dependent on CD4ϩ T cell help during the European Science Foundation (to M.L.A.). priming phase (6, 15). Moreover, cross-priming to this epitope has 2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Matthew L. Albert, Institut k3 b Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr. ROUX, Paris 75724, France. E-mail address: albertm@ been reported to be inefficient in models when allo (H2 H2 )or ␤ ␤ Ϫ/Ϫ pasteur.fr 2-microglobulin-deficient ( 2m ) cells are used as the source 3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; CFDA-SE, carboxyfluorescein of male Ag (16, 17). Finally, the HY model is physiologically and ␤ ␤ diacetate succinimidyl ester; 2m, 2-microglobulin; DLN, draining lymph node; pathologically relevant because the minor histocompatibility Ags SFC, spot forming cell; WT, wild type. are normal cellular proteins and have been implicated in the clin- Copyright © 2008 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. 0022-1767/08/$2.00 ical complications associated with graft-versus-host disease. We www.jimmunol.org 3068 Ag PERSISTENCE IS REQUIRED FOR CROSS-PRIMING FIGURE 1. Efficient cross-presentation of ␤ Ϫ/Ϫ 2m male cells does not permit effective cross-priming of H-2Db uty-specific CD8ϩ T cells. A, Female mice were immunized in- tradermally with 5 ϫ 106 CD11c-depleted splenocytes that had been isolated from WT ␤ Ϫ/Ϫ or 2m male mice. Live, nonclumped, lineage-positive cells were gated. Depletion was confirmed using FACS analysis. B, Af- ter 12 days, the efficiency of priming uty- specific CD8ϩ T cells was determined using IFN-␥ ELISPOT. Purified CD8ϩ T cells were restimulated ex vivo for 24 h using fe- male DCs loaded with uty peptide (F). Un- pulsed DCs served as a negative control (E). Downloaded from Each mouse is represented and the number of SFC per 106 total CD8ϩ T cells is mea- sured. Horizontal bars indicate the mean. This experiment is representative of eight similar experiments. C, To monitor cross- presentation of injected male Ag, the trigger- ϩ ing of MataHari CD8 T cell division was http://www.jimmunol.org/ assessed. A total of 2 ϫ 105 CFDA-SE- labeled MataHari CD8ϩ T cells (CD45.2) was transferred into recipient female mice (CD45.1), and T cell division was followed ␤ Ϫ/Ϫ 3 days after immunization with 2m male cells by gating on CD8␤ϩCD45.2ϩ cells. Results are representative of four in- dependent experiments from which 3/3 mice tested (1, 2, 3) are in one such experiment. by guest on September 26, 2021 ϩ report that contrary to the autopilot expansion of CD8 T cells that peptide dby (DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 3, Y-linked) is used has been demonstrated in helper-independent models of CD8ϩ T in priming experiments. Labeling with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succin- cell priming, the priming of HY-reactive CD8ϩ T cells requires the imidyl ester (CFDA-SE) was performed using the Vybrant CFDA-SE cell tracer kit from Molecular Probes.
Recommended publications
  • Priming of Virus-Immune Memory T Cells in Newborn Mice DAVID H
    INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, Jan. 1984, p. 202-205 Vol. 43, No. 1 0019-9567/84/010202-04$02.00/0 Copyright (© 1984, American Society for Microbiology Priming of Virus-Immune Memory T Cells in Newborn Mice DAVID H. SCHWARTZ, JULIA L. HURWITZ,* NEIL S. GREENSPAN,t AND PETER C. DOHERTYt The Wistar Institute ofAnatomy and Biology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 Received 6 May 1983/Accepted 27 September 1983 Neonatal BALB/c mice can be primed at birth by intravenous inoculation of a small dose of A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1) (PR8) influenza virus, UV-inactivated PR8 virus, or PR8 virus complexed with monoclonal antibody to give a secondary cytotoxic T lymphocyte response when restimulated in vitro as adults. The frequency of responding T cells after secondary stimulation in vitro is approximately 40% of that found for adult mice primed intraperitoneally with a large dose of PR8 virus. The majority of the T cells generated from mice primed at birth or as adults are cross-reactive for H-2-compatible targets infected with the PR8 (H1N1) or A/Hong Kong/X31 (H3N2) viruses. Splenocytes from neonates receiving UV-inactivated vaccinia virus at birth give an augmented secondary cytotoxic T lymphocyte response when restimulated 8 days later in adoptive irradiated adult hosts. We found no indications of specific immunological unrespon- siveness in mice exposed to either virus. We have analyzed previously the development of virus- cells per ml for 1 h at 37°C. Graded numbers of effector specific T cell competence in neonatal mice and have spleen cells and 2 x 105 syngeneic virus-infected, irradiated reported the presence of vaccinia virus-specific cytotoxic T stimulator cells were distributed in 100-.pl portions to the 60 lymphocyte (CTL) precursors in the thymus of 0- to 3-day- inside wells of 96-well, V-bottom plates.
    [Show full text]
  • Priming with Inflammatory Cytokines Is Not a Prerequisite to Increase
    Lange-Consiglio et al. Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2020) 11:99 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01611-z RESEARCH Open Access Priming with inflammatory cytokines is not a prerequisite to increase immune- suppressive effects and responsiveness of equine amniotic mesenchymal stromal cells Anna Lange-Consiglio1* , Pietro Romele2, Marta Magatti2, Antonietta Silini2, Antonella Idda1, Nicola Antonio Martino3, Fausto Cremonesi1 and Ornella Parolini2,4 Abstract Background: Equine amniotic mesenchymal stromal cells (AMSCs) and their conditioned medium (CM) were evaluated for their ability to inhibit in vitro proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with and without priming. Additionally, AMSC immunogenicity was assessed by expression of MHCI and MHCII and their ability to counteract the in vitro inflammatory process. Methods: Horse PBMC proliferation was induced with phytohemagglutinin. AMSC priming was performed with 10 ng/ml of TNF-α, 100 ng/ml of IFN-γ, and a combination of 5 ng/ml of TNF-α and 50 ng/ml of IFN-γ. The CM generated from naïve unprimed and primed AMSCs was also tested to evaluate its effects on equine endometrial cells in an in vitro inflammatory model induced by LPS. Immunogenicity marker expression (MHCI and II) was evaluated by qRT-PCR and by flow cytometry. Results: Priming does not increase MHCI and II expression. Furthermore, the inhibition of PBMC proliferation was comparable between naïve and conditioned cells, with the exception of AMSCs primed with both TNF-α and IFN-γ that had a reduced capacity to inhibit T cell proliferation. However, AMSC viability was lower after priming than under other experimental conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Induction of Antigen-Specific CD4+ T Cells Guides Coordinated Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses to SARS-Cov-2 Mrna Vaccination
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.440862; this version posted April 22, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Rapid induction of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells guides coordinated humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination Authors: Mark M. Painter1,2, †, Divij Mathew1,2, †, Rishi R. Goel1,2, †, Sokratis A. Apostolidis1,2,3, †, Ajinkya Pattekar2, Oliva Kuthuru1, Amy E. Baxter1, Ramin S. Herati4, Derek A. Oldridge1,5, Sigrid Gouma6, Philip Hicks6, Sarah Dysinger6, Kendall A. Lundgreen6, Leticia Kuri-Cervantes1,6, Sharon Adamski2, Amanda Hicks2, Scott Korte2, Josephine R. Giles1,7,8, Madison E. Weirick6, Christopher M. McAllister6, Jeanette Dougherty1, Sherea Long1, Kurt D’Andrea1, Jacob T. Hamilton2,6, Michael R. Betts1,6, Paul Bates6, Scott E. Hensley6, Alba Grifoni9, Daniela Weiskopf9, Alessandro Sette9, Allison R. Greenplate1,2, E. John Wherry1,2,7,8,* Affiliations 1 Institute for Immunology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA 2 Immune Health™, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA 3 Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA 4 NYU Langone Vaccine Center, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 5 Department
    [Show full text]
  • Immunology 101
    Immunology 101 Justin Kline, M.D. Assistant Professor of Medicine Section of Hematology/Oncology Committee on Immunology University of Chicago Medicine Disclosures • I served as a consultant on Advisory Boards for Merck and Seattle Genetics. • I will discuss non-FDA-approved therapies for cancer 2 Outline • Innate and adaptive immune systems – brief intro • How immune responses against cancer are generated • Cancer antigens in the era of cancer exome sequencing • Dendritic cells • T cells • Cancer immune evasion • Cancer immunotherapies – brief intro 3 The immune system • Evolved to provide protection against invasive pathogens • Consists of a variety of cells and proteins whose purpose is to generate immune responses against micro-organisms • The immune system is “educated” to attack foreign invaders, but at the same time, leave healthy, self-tissues unharmed • The immune system can sometimes recognize and kill cancer cells • 2 main branches • Innate immune system – Initial responders • Adaptive immune system – Tailored attack 4 The immune system – a division of labor Innate immune system • Initial recognition of non-self (i.e. infection, cancer) • Comprised of cells (granulocytes, monocytes, dendritic cells and NK cells) and proteins (complement) • Recognizes non-self via receptors that “see” microbial structures (cell wall components, DNA, RNA) • Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) • Necessary for priming adaptive immune responses 5 The immune system – a division of labor Adaptive immune system • Provides nearly unlimited diversity of receptors to protect the host from infection • B cells and T cells • Have unique receptors generated during development • B cells produce antibodies which help fight infection • T cells patrol for infected or cancerous cells • Recognize “foreign” or abnormal proteins on the cell surface • 100,000,000 unique T cells are present in all of us • Retains “memory” against infections and in some cases, cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccine Immunology Claire-Anne Siegrist
    2 Vaccine Immunology Claire-Anne Siegrist To generate vaccine-mediated protection is a complex chal- non–antigen-specifc responses possibly leading to allergy, lenge. Currently available vaccines have largely been devel- autoimmunity, or even premature death—are being raised. oped empirically, with little or no understanding of how they Certain “off-targets effects” of vaccines have also been recog- activate the immune system. Their early protective effcacy is nized and call for studies to quantify their impact and identify primarily conferred by the induction of antigen-specifc anti- the mechanisms at play. The objective of this chapter is to bodies (Box 2.1). However, there is more to antibody- extract from the complex and rapidly evolving feld of immu- mediated protection than the peak of vaccine-induced nology the main concepts that are useful to better address antibody titers. The quality of such antibodies (e.g., their these important questions. avidity, specifcity, or neutralizing capacity) has been identi- fed as a determining factor in effcacy. Long-term protection HOW DO VACCINES MEDIATE PROTECTION? requires the persistence of vaccine antibodies above protective thresholds and/or the maintenance of immune memory cells Vaccines protect by inducing effector mechanisms (cells or capable of rapid and effective reactivation with subsequent molecules) capable of rapidly controlling replicating patho- microbial exposure. The determinants of immune memory gens or inactivating their toxic components. Vaccine-induced induction, as well as the relative contribution of persisting immune effectors (Table 2.1) are essentially antibodies— antibodies and of immune memory to protection against spe- produced by B lymphocytes—capable of binding specifcally cifc diseases, are essential parameters of long-term vaccine to a toxin or a pathogen.2 Other potential effectors are cyto- effcacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Innate Cytokine Induced Early Release of IFN and CC
    cells Article Innate Cytokine Induced Early Release of IFNγ and CC Chemokines from Hypoxic Human NK Cells Is Independent of Glucose Sonia Y. Velásquez, Bianca S. Himmelhan, Nina Kassner, Anna Coulibaly, Jutta Schulte, Kathrin Brohm and Holger A. Lindner * Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, Institute for Innate Immunoscience (MI3), University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; [email protected] (S.Y.V.); [email protected] (B.S.H.); [email protected] (N.K.); [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (K.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 February 2020; Accepted: 14 March 2020; Published: 17 March 2020 Abstract: Natural killer (NK) cells are among the first innate immune cells to arrive at sites of tissue inflammation and regulate the immune response to infection and tumors by the release of cytokines including interferon (IFN)γ. In vitro exposure to the innate cytokines interleukin 15 (IL-15) and IL-12/IL-18 enhances NK cell IFNγ production which, beyond 16 h of culture, was shown to depend on metabolic switching to glycolysis. NK effector responses are, however, rapid by comparison. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the importance of glycolysis for shorter-term IFNγ production, considering glucose deprivation and hypoxia as adverse tissue inflammation associated conditions. Treatments with IL-15 for 6 and 16 h were equally effective in priming early IFNγ production in human NK cells in response to secondary IL-12/IL-18 stimulation.
    [Show full text]
  • T Cells in the Priming and Effector/Memory Phases of Adoptive Immunotherapy
    Divergent Roles for CD4+ T Cells in the Priming and Effector/Memory Phases of Adoptive Immunotherapy This information is current as Hong-Ming Hu, Hauke Winter, Walter J. Urba and Bernard of September 26, 2021. A. Fox J Immunol 2000; 165:4246-4253; ; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.8.4246 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/165/8/4246 Downloaded from References This article cites 49 articles, 31 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/165/8/4246.full#ref-list-1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication by guest on September 26, 2021 *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. /Divergent Roles for CD4؉ T Cells in the Priming and Effector Memory Phases of Adoptive Immunotherapy1 Hong-Ming Hu,*† Hauke Winter,2* Walter J. Urba,*‡ and Bernard A. Fox3*†‡§ The requirement for CD4؉ Th cells in the cross-priming of antitumor CTL is well accepted in tumor immunology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Innate Immune System and Inflammatory Priming: Potential Mechanistic Factors in Mood Disorders and Gulf War Illness
    REVIEW published: 23 July 2020 doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00704 The Innate Immune System and Inflammatory Priming: Potential Mechanistic Factors in Mood Disorders and Gulf War Illness Kyle J. Trageser 1, Maria Sebastian-Valverde 1, Sean X Naughton 1 and Giulio Maria Pasinetti 1,2* 1 Department of Neurology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 2 Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States Edited by: Gabriella Martino, University of Messina, Italy Gulf War Illness is a chronic multisystem disorder affecting approximately a third of the Reviewed by: Veterans of the Gulf War, manifesting with physical and mental health symptoms such as Lisa James, cognitive impairment, neurological abnormalities, and dysregulation of mood. Among the University of Minnesota Twin Cities, United States leading theories into the etiology of this multisystem disorder is environmental exposure to Kimberly A. Kelly, the various neurotoxins encountered in the Gulf Theatre, including organophosphates, National Institute for Occupational fi Safety and Health (NIOSH), nerve agents, pyridostigmine bromide, smoke from oil well res, and depleted uranium. United States The relationship of toxin exposure and the pathogenesis of Gulf War Illness converges on *Correspondence: the innate immune system: a nonspecific form of immunity ubiquitous in nature that acts to Giulio Maria Pasinetti respond to both exogenous and endogenous insults. Activation of the innate immune [email protected] system results in inflammation mediated by the release of cytokines. Cytokine mediated Specialty section: neuroinflammation has been demonstrated in a number of psychiatric conditions and may This article was submitted to help explain the larger than expected population of Gulf War Veterans afflicted with a Psychopathology, a section of the journal mood disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Antigenic Sin Priming of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin Stalk Antibodies
    Original antigenic sin priming of influenza virus hemagglutinin stalk antibodies Claudia P. Arevaloa, Valerie Le Sageb, Marcus J. Boltona, Theresa Eilolaa, Jennifer E. Jonesb, Karen A. Kormuthb, Eric Nturibib, Angel Balmasedac, Aubree Gordond, Seema S. Lakdawalab,e, and Scott E. Hensleya,1 aDepartment of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; bDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15219; cCentro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Ministry of Health, Managua, Nicaragua 16064; dDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and eCenter for Vaccine Research, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Edited by Michael B.A. Oldstone, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, and approved May 27, 2020 (received for review November 18, 2019) Immunity to influenza viruses can be long-lived, but reinfections but there are more conserved epitopes in the HA stalk domain. with antigenically distinct viral strains and subtypes are common. Antibodies that recognize the HA stalk of group 1 or group 2 Reinfections can boost antibody responses against viral strains viruses have been well characterized, but antibodies that recog- first encountered in childhood through a process termed “original nize the HA stalk of both group 1 and group 2 viruses are rare antigenic sin.” It is unknown how initial childhood exposures af- (15, 16). Interestingly, childhood influenza A virus exposures are fect the induction of antibodies against the hemagglutinin (HA) associated with heterosubtypic protection against distinct stalk domain of influenza viruses. This is an important consider- emerging influenza virus subtypes later in life (13).
    [Show full text]
  • Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Cross-Prime Naive CD8 T Cells by Transferring Antigen to Conventional Dendritic Cells Through Exosomes
    Plasmacytoid dendritic cells cross-prime naive CD8 T cells by transferring antigen to conventional dendritic cells through exosomes Chunmei Fua, Peng Pengb, Jakob Loschkoc, Li Fengb, Phuong Phamb, Weiguo Cuid, Kelvin P. Leeb, Anne B. Kruge, and Aimin Jianga,1 aCenter for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202; bDepartment of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263; cII Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, D-81675 Munich, Germany; dBlood Research Institute, Blood Center of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53213; and eInstitute for Immunology, Biomedical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany Edited by Peter Cresswell, Yale University, New Haven, CT, and approved August 11, 2020 (received for review February 6, 2020) Although plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) have been shown to in human cancers, indicating pDC-mediated anti-tumor immunity play a critical role in generating viral immunity and promoting (14, 18–22). However, how pDCs function in generating CD8 tolerance to suppress antitumor immunity, whether and how pDCs T cell immunity remains poorly understood. cross-prime CD8 T cells in vivo remain controversial. Using a pDC- Although initially thought of as the less efficient antigen pre- targeted vaccine model to deliver antigens specifically to pDCs, we senting cells (APCs), pDCs can present antigens to activate both have demonstrated that pDC-targeted vaccination led to strong CD4 T cells as well as CD8 T cells through cross-presentation cross-priming and durable CD8 T cell immunity. Surprisingly, cross- (23, 24). Cross-priming, the activation of naive CD8 T cells fol- presenting pDCs required conventional DCs (cDCs) to achieve cross- lowing DC-mediated cross-presentation—the process through priming in vivo by transferring antigens to cDCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Priming Uptake of Tumor Apoptotic Cells Leading to Dendritic
    Type I IFNs Control Antigen Retention and Survival of CD8 α+ Dendritic Cells after Uptake of Tumor Apoptotic Cells Leading to Cross-Priming This information is current as of September 24, 2021. Silvia Lorenzi, Fabrizio Mattei, Antonella Sistigu, Laura Bracci, Francesca Spadaro, Massimo Sanchez, Massimo Spada, Filippo Belardelli, Lucia Gabriele and Giovanna Schiavoni J Immunol 2011; 186:5142-5150; Prepublished online 25 Downloaded from March 2011; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1004163 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/186/9/5142 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2011/03/25/jimmunol.100416 Material 3.DC1 References This article cites 42 articles, 20 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/186/9/5142.full#ref-list-1 by guest on September 24, 2021 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2011 by
    [Show full text]
  • Trained Immunity, Tolerance, Priming and Differentiation: Distinct
    comment Trained immunity, tolerance, priming and diferentiation: distinct immunological processes The similarities and diferences between trained immunity and other immune processes are the subject of intense interrogation. Therefore, a consensus on the defnition of trained immunity in both in vitro and in vivo settings, as well as in experimental models and human subjects, is necessary for advancing this feld of research. Here we aim to establish a common framework that describes the experimental standards for defning trained immunity. Maziar Divangahi, Peter Aaby, Shabaana Abdul Khader, Luis B. Barreiro, Siroon Bekkering, Triantafyllos Chavakis, Reinout van Crevel, Nigel Curtis, Andrew R. DiNardo, Jorge Dominguez-Andres, Raphael Duivenvoorden, Stephanie Fanucchi, Zahi Fayad, Elaine Fuchs, Melanie Hamon, Kate L. Jefrey, Nargis Khan, Leo A. B. Joosten, Eva Kaufmann, Eicke Latz, Giuseppe Matarese, Jos W. M. van der Meer, Musa Mhlanga, Simone J. C. F. M. Moorlag, Willem J. M. Mulder, Shruti Naik, Boris Novakovic, Luke O’Neill, Jordi Ochando, Keiko Ozato, Niels P. Riksen, Robert Sauerwein, Edward R. Sherwood, Andreas Schlitzer, Joachim L. Schultze, Michael H. Sieweke, Christine Stabell Benn, Henk Stunnenberg, Joseph Sun, Frank L. van de Veerdonk, Sebastian Weis, David L. Williams, Ramnik Xavier and Mihai G. Netea rained immunity has been defined bacteria (for example, Bacille Calmette– pathogens. Epidemiological studies have as one form of adaptation of innate Guérin (BCG)), fungi (for example, Candida shown that vaccination with certain live Thost defense mechanisms or a de albicans) or helminth parasites (for example, vaccines provides heterologous protection facto innate immune memory. Following Nippostrongylus brasiliensis) protects against against unrelated pathogens. For example, exposure to particular infectious agents heterologous infections independently of BCG vaccination in newborn children or vaccines, trained immunity can mount adaptive immunity1.
    [Show full text]