Gene Expression Profiles of Multiple Independent Cadmium- And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gene Expression Profiles of Multiple Independent Cadmium- And Gene Expression Profiles of Multiple Independent Cadmium‐ and Arsenite‐ Transformed Human Urothelial Cells: Specific Gene Signatures in a Sea of Heterogeneity. Scott Garrett Department of Pathology School of Medicine and Health Sciences University of North Dakota Grand Forks ND Problems in Cancer Research • Environmental causation of cancer – President’s Cancer Panel 2008‐09, Reducing Environmental Cancer Risk, “Environmentally caused cancer are ggyrossly underestimated..” • Desperate need for diagnostic and prognostic markers of cancer. – Screening for common cancers – Prognostic markers for predicting cancer that need aggressive treatments from those that don’t • Also, need to understand carcinogenesis for prevention and treatment. Bladder Cancer Has a High Environmental Etiology • Aromatic amine dyes in bladder cancer was the first environmental etiology in cancer. • Nearly 50% of BC thought to be caused by cigarette smoking • Suscept ibility due to concentration of carcinogens in urine. Arsenite (As+3) & Cadmium (Cd+2) • Arsenite in drinking water linked to BC in South Asia • Confirmed in animal models • Arsenite, 1St in priority as a toxic substance (ATSDR). • Cadmium has also been linked to BC, albeit much weaker, but: – Cigarette smoking is a major source of cadmium Overall Experimental Approach Long‐Term Cultured Cells Transformed Cells Metal Exposure Tranf & assess Discover Induced or tumor behavior Transfect or Repressed Gene knockdown & assess cell behavior Gene X Human Tissues Assess correlation to tumor grade Mechanism of gene and clinical outcome expression change General Experimental Approach Athymic Nude Mouse Cell Culture Models In Vivo Tumor Model Biopsy Specimens (formalin fixed PET) Immunohistochemistry Attached Clinical Outcome Bladder Model • UROtsa Cells – Human urothelial cell line – Details Metal Transformation of UROtsa as a modldel of Blddladder Carcinogenesis • Culture in 1 µM Cd+2 or As+3 (several months continuous culture) • Test for anchorage independent growth Soft Agar Assay • IjInjec t s.c itinto athym icnude mice Global Gene Expression Analysis to Assess Tumors Array Hybridization SHG003‐U133_Plus_2_Unfiltered.TXT Array Analysis • Thousands of Genes • Had Keratin on our minds • KRT1666:KRT6 (6A ) Human tumors for KRT6 Heterotransplants for KRT6 Environ Health Perspect (2008) 116:434–44 Main Question • During transformation of cell lines by a carcinogen, how reproducible are the gene expression changes? – Important because of heterogeneity of cancer. • Implications to applications of cell culture based studies • Are there carcinogen based expression changes? – Give clues to mechanism of transformation – Source of biomarkers of carcinogens Experimental Setup Note on Metal Characteristics These two metals are +2 • Cd very divergent and excellent to test in this – No redox reaction system. – Binds SH groups – Accumulative toxin (especially kidney) • As+3 – Arsenic considered a metalloid – Mono & Dimethyl‐species – OidiOxidize to AVAsV (bl(resemble phhthosphate in chit)hemistry) – As+3 exists as trihydroxy neutral species at pH 7 – Relatively low in total accumulation Transformed UROtsa Isolates As+3: Five isolates Cd+2: Six Isolates Arrays ‐ three control (non‐transformed) ‐ one of each FDR and the 5% Problem • In statistical analysis, p‐value of 0.05: 5% probability of the null hypothesis being true. • But in repetitive measurements have problem • 5% of 23,000 genes in genome = 1150 false pos. • RllReally want to contltrol for 5% flfalse discovery – Thus the false discovery rate is calculated. – Requires very small p‐values 0.001 to E‐09 As+3‐Heat Map Note on Genes versus Probes • 133 Plus 2.0 is slightly redundant – 45,000 probes – Have about 23,000 genes • About 2 fold redundancy • Multiple probes measure different exons – Complexity of probe changes can also reflect alternative splicing. • Fold 2 Change and DEGs – DEG (Differentially Expressed Genes) is a statistical entity Alterations in Gene Expression in As+3‐ Transfdformed Isolates Number of probes with fold 2 change or greater Principal Component Analysis Red: Parental Controls Blue: As+3‐Transformed As+3‐ & Cd+2‐Transformants Heat Map As+3‐Cd+2 Venn Comparison Ave of leaving one Cd+2‐ Isolate out: 346 induced, 251 repressed Cd+2‐Isolates have many more repressed gene overlaps than that of As+3 As+3 & Cd+2 Principal Component Analysis Global Gene Overlap Probe Redundancy Removed p << 10E‐6 for gene overlap Overlap by random chance estimated < 20 genes Are Gene Expression Changes Random? • Single Isolate: 3871 • Overlap of two isolates: 1624 • Three isolates: 759 • Four: 414 • All five: 221 • It will probably decrease with more isolates. • Would there be any gene overlap left over with many isolates? Or will it be zero? Mathematical Modeling Gene Overlap with Increasing Number of Isolates 4 parameter Linear Model Cadmium logistic model Induced gene overlap stabilizes at about 230 genes at higher Induced numbers of isolates. Repressed gene overlap stabilizes Repressed at 198 The Linear Model • Considers random variation and statistics • Log(y‐t)=α + βx + ε – X= number of isolates – Y= number of genes – t= constant integer – α and β are pp,arameters, ε is the random error. • Y converges to t as number of isolates (x) increases. • Using y= 285 at x=6, t ranges (0 to 284) • R2 can be calculated for each line at every value t • t=233 yields best R2 value (0.993) • Minimum no of isolates: 14 to give CI <1 Mathematical Modeling Gene Overlap with Increasing Number of Isolates 4 parameter logistic model Arsenite Stabilizes at 265 Induced genes Stabilizes at Repressed 63 genes What Does This Mean? • Thousands of gene expression changes in transformed isolates. • Small but statistically significant number of gene expression changes common to all isolates. • Hypothesis: this reflects the “driver”‐ ”””passenger” mutation concept of carcinogenesis. Gene Validation using PCR‐Array • SA Biosciences • Custom primers targeted to exons near to array target sequence. • All assays were valida te d • Normalized to geometric mean of five reference genes (house‐keeping) Gene Validation using PCR‐Array • SA Biosciences • Custom primers designed to nearest exons of array target sequence • 338 genes, five house keeping genes – All on one 384 tray. – One sample per tray, 36 trays in all. Validation Heat Map 24 out of 338 failed to validate (7.1 %) KEGG Pathways As+3 Induced Repressed Pathway P‐Value Pathway P‐Value Glyco lys is / Gluconeogenes is 0040.04 Thyroid cancer 0.025 Biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids <0.001 Biosynthesis of terpenoids and steroids <0.001 Apoptosis 0.015 Biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from shikimate pathway <0.001 Endocytosis <0.001 Biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from ornithine, lysine and Acute myeloid leukemia 0.045 nicotinic acid <0.001 Antigen processing and presentation <0.001 Biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from histidine and purine 0.015 Biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from terpenoid and Type I diabetes mellitus <0.001 polyketide <0.001 Autoimmune thyroid disease <0.001 Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism <0.001 Allograft rejection <0.001 Arginine and proline metabolism 0.005 Graft-versus-host disease <0.001 Nitrogen metabolism 0.035 Primary immunodeficiency <0.001 Cysteine and methionine metabolism <0.001 Fructose and mannose metabolism 0.03 Galactose metabolism 0.015 Starch and sucrose metabolism 0.015 Streptomycin biosynthesis 0 Selenoamino acid metabolism <0.001 Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism 0.015 Tropane, piperidine and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis 0.01 D-Glutamine and D-glutamate metabolism 0.03 Glyc ine, ser ine an d threon ine me ta bo lism 0. 005 Aminophosphonate metabolism 0.025 Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism 0.02 KEGG Pathway Cd+2 Induced Repressed Pathway P‐value Pathway P‐Value Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism 0.03 Jak-STAT signaling pathway <0.001 Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism 0.015 beta-Alanine metabolism 0.03 Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction <0.001 DNA replication <0.001 Apoptosis <0.001 Fatty acid biosynthesis <0.001 Fructose and mannose metabolism 0.04 Wnt signaling pathway <0.001 Galactose metabolism 0.005 Tyrosine metabolism <0.001 Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesis 0. 045 Pentose and glucuronate interconversions <0.001 Glycosphingolipid biosynthesis - lacto and neolacto series 0.015 Cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway 0.005 Hematopoietic cell lineage 0.02 Chemokine signaling pathway 0.025 Nucleotide excision repair 0.015 Pentose phosphate pathway 0. 005 BllliBasal cell carcinoma 0. 025 Propanoate metabolism 0.03 Primary immunodeficiency 0.025 Purine metabolism 0.04 Pyrimidine metabolism 0.03 Hedgehog signaling pathway 0.025 Sphingolipid metabolism 0.04 Metabolism of xenobiotics byyy cytochrome P450 0.045 Starch and sucrose metabolism <0.001 RIG-I-like receptor signaling pathway 0.045 KEGG Pathways Both As & Cd Induced RdRepressed Pathway P‐ P‐Value Pathway P‐Value P‐Value Value Cd+2 As+3 Cd+2 As+3 Alan ine, aspartate andld glutamate Apoptosis 0. 015 <0.001 metabolism <0.001 0.03 Primary immunodeficiency <0.001 0.025 Fructose and mannose metabolism 0.03 0.04 GlGalactose metablibolism 0010.015 0000.005 Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesis 0.04 0.045 Mismatch repair 0.03 0.015 Starch and sucrose metabolism 0.015 <0.001 As+3‐Induced Specific Genes Symbol Gene Name Fold Chg FDR Validated CPA6 carboxypeptidase A6 32.14 0.0001Yes DOCK11 dedicator of cytokinesis 11 18.51 0.0137Yes C17orf96 chromosome 17 open reading frame 96 13.97 0.0252Yes HRASLS HRAS‐like suppressor 13.89
Recommended publications
  • Screening and Identification of Key Biomarkers in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on Bioinformatics Analysis
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.21.423889; this version posted December 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Screening and identification of key biomarkers in clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on bioinformatics analysis Basavaraj Vastrad1, Chanabasayya Vastrad*2 , Iranna Kotturshetti 1. Department of Biochemistry, Basaveshwar College of Pharmacy, Gadag, Karnataka 582103, India. 2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001, Karanataka, India. 3. Department of Ayurveda, Rajiv Gandhi Education Society`s Ayurvedic Medical College, Ron, Karnataka 562209, India. * Chanabasayya Vastrad [email protected] Ph: +919480073398 Chanabasava Nilaya, Bharthinagar, Dharwad 580001 , Karanataka, India bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.21.423889; this version posted December 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most common types of malignancy of the urinary system. The pathogenesis and effective diagnosis of ccRCC have become popular topics for research in the previous decade. In the current study, an integrated bioinformatics analysis was performed to identify core genes associated in ccRCC. An expression dataset (GSE105261) was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and included 26 ccRCC and 9 normal kideny samples. Assessment of the microarray dataset led to the recognition of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), which was subsequently used for pathway and gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Analysis Reveals the Complexity of the Human Glomerular Extracellular Matrix
    Global analysis reveals the complexity of the human glomerular extracellular matrix Rachel Lennon,1,2 Adam Byron,1,* Jonathan D. Humphries,1 Michael J. Randles,1,2 Alex Carisey,1 Stephanie Murphy,1,2 David Knight,3 Paul E. Brenchley,2 Roy Zent,4,5 and Martin J. Humphries.1 1Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; 2Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; 3Biological Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; 4Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; and 5Veterans Affairs Hospital, Nashville, TN, USA. *Present address: Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Running title: Proteome of the glomerular matrix Word count: Abstract: 208, main text 2765 Corresponding author: Dr Rachel Lennon, Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, Michael Smith Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK. Phone: 0044 (0) 161 2755498. Fax: 0044 (0) 161 2755082. Email: [email protected] Abstract The glomerulus contains unique cellular and extracellular matrix (ECM) components, which are required for intact barrier function. Studies of the cellular components have helped to build understanding of glomerular disease; however, the full composition and regulation of glomerular ECM remains poorly understood. Here, we employed mass spectrometry–based proteomics of enriched ECM extracts for a global analysis of human glomerular ECM in vivo and identified a tissue-specific proteome of 144 structural and regulatory ECM proteins. This catalogue includes all previously identified glomerular components, plus many new and abundant components.
    [Show full text]
  • Propranolol-Mediated Attenuation of MMP-9 Excretion in Infants with Hemangiomas
    Supplementary Online Content Thaivalappil S, Bauman N, Saieg A, Movius E, Brown KJ, Preciado D. Propranolol-mediated attenuation of MMP-9 excretion in infants with hemangiomas. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.4773 eTable. List of All of the Proteins Identified by Proteomics This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. © 2013 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 10/01/2021 eTable. List of All of the Proteins Identified by Proteomics Protein Name Prop 12 mo/4 Pred 12 mo/4 Δ Prop to Pred mo mo Myeloperoxidase OS=Homo sapiens GN=MPO 26.00 143.00 ‐117.00 Lactotransferrin OS=Homo sapiens GN=LTF 114.00 205.50 ‐91.50 Matrix metalloproteinase‐9 OS=Homo sapiens GN=MMP9 5.00 36.00 ‐31.00 Neutrophil elastase OS=Homo sapiens GN=ELANE 24.00 48.00 ‐24.00 Bleomycin hydrolase OS=Homo sapiens GN=BLMH 3.00 25.00 ‐22.00 CAP7_HUMAN Azurocidin OS=Homo sapiens GN=AZU1 PE=1 SV=3 4.00 26.00 ‐22.00 S10A8_HUMAN Protein S100‐A8 OS=Homo sapiens GN=S100A8 PE=1 14.67 30.50 ‐15.83 SV=1 IL1F9_HUMAN Interleukin‐1 family member 9 OS=Homo sapiens 1.00 15.00 ‐14.00 GN=IL1F9 PE=1 SV=1 MUC5B_HUMAN Mucin‐5B OS=Homo sapiens GN=MUC5B PE=1 SV=3 2.00 14.00 ‐12.00 MUC4_HUMAN Mucin‐4 OS=Homo sapiens GN=MUC4 PE=1 SV=3 1.00 12.00 ‐11.00 HRG_HUMAN Histidine‐rich glycoprotein OS=Homo sapiens GN=HRG 1.00 12.00 ‐11.00 PE=1 SV=1 TKT_HUMAN Transketolase OS=Homo sapiens GN=TKT PE=1 SV=3 17.00 28.00 ‐11.00 CATG_HUMAN Cathepsin G OS=Homo
    [Show full text]
  • FLRT Proteins Are Endogenous Latrophilin Ligands and Regulate Excitatory Synapse Development
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Neuron Report FLRT Proteins Are Endogenous Latrophilin Ligands and Regulate Excitatory Synapse Development Matthew L. O’Sullivan,1,5 Joris de Wit,1,5 Jeffrey N. Savas,2 Davide Comoletti,3 Stefanie Otto-Hitt,1,6 John R. Yates III,2 and Anirvan Ghosh1,4,* 1Neurobiology Section, Division of Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA 2Department of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA 3Child Health Institute of New Jersey and Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, UMDNJ/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA 4CNS Discovery, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, 4070 Basel, Switzerland 5These authors contributed equally to this work 6Present address: Department of Natural Sciences, Carroll College, Helena, MT 59625, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.018 SUMMARY much effort has been expended investigating the mechanisms of a-latrotoxin action (Su¨ dhof, 2001), nothing is known about Latrophilins (LPHNs) are a small family of G protein- the endogenous function of latrophilins in vertebrates. Further coupled receptors known to mediate the massive evidence for the importance of latrophilins in the proper synaptic exocytosis caused by the black widow functioning of neural circuits comes from recent human spider venom a-latrotoxin, but their endogenous genetics studies that have linked LPHN3 mutations to attention ligands and function remain unclear. Mutations in deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a common and highly LPHN3 are strongly associated with attention deficit heritable developmental psychiatric disorder (Arcos-Burgos et al., 2010; Domene´ et al., 2011; Jain et al., 2011; Ribase´ s hyperactivity disorder, suggesting a role for latrophi- et al., 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    Edinburgh Research Explorer International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list Citation for published version: Davenport, AP, Alexander, SPH, Sharman, JL, Pawson, AJ, Benson, HE, Monaghan, AE, Liew, WC, Mpamhanga, CP, Bonner, TI, Neubig, RR, Pin, JP, Spedding, M & Harmar, AJ 2013, 'International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list: recommendations for new pairings with cognate ligands', Pharmacological reviews, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 967-86. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007179 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1124/pr.112.007179 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Pharmacological reviews Publisher Rights Statement: U.S. Government work not protected by U.S. copyright General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 1521-0081/65/3/967–986$25.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007179 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Pharmacol Rev 65:967–986, July 2013 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Influences on Endothelial Gene Expression
    ENDOTHELIAL CELL GENE EXPRESSION John Matthew Jeff Herbert Supervisors: Prof. Roy Bicknell and Dr. Victoria Heath PhD thesis University of Birmingham August 2012 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Tumour angiogenesis is a vital process in the pathology of tumour development and metastasis. Targeting markers of tumour endothelium provide a means of targeted destruction of a tumours oxygen and nutrient supply via destruction of tumour vasculature, which in turn ultimately leads to beneficial consequences to patients. Although current anti -angiogenic and vascular targeting strategies help patients, more potently in combination with chemo therapy, there is still a need for more tumour endothelial marker discoveries as current treatments have cardiovascular and other side effects. For the first time, the analyses of in-vivo biotinylation of an embryonic system is performed to obtain putative vascular targets. Also for the first time, deep sequencing is applied to freshly isolated tumour and normal endothelial cells from lung, colon and bladder tissues for the identification of pan-vascular-targets. Integration of the proteomic, deep sequencing, public cDNA libraries and microarrays, delivers 5,892 putative vascular targets to the science community.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Article FREM2 Is an Independent Predictor of Poor Survival in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma-Evidence from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)
    Int J Clin Exp Med 2019;12(12):13741-13748 www.ijcem.com /ISSN:1940-5901/IJCEM0076963 Original Article FREM2 is an independent predictor of poor survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma-evidence from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) Weiping Huang, Yongyong Lu, Xixi Huang, Feng Wang, Zhixian Yu Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, Zhejiang Province, China Received February 26, 2018; Accepted October 7, 2018; Epub December 15, 2019; Published December 30, 2019 Abstract: Fraser syndrome protein 1 (FRAS1) and FRAS1 related extracellular matrix protein 1 and 2 (FREM1, FREM2) are a novel group of basement membrane proteins. The relationship between the three gene (FRAS1, FREM1, FREM2) and renal clear cell carcinoma is completely unclear. Thus, in this research, we used the mRNA sequencing data derived from TCGA kidney renal clear cell carcinoma cohort to assess the association of FRAS1, FREM1 and FREM2 with different clinical features. FRAS1, FREM1 and FREM2 mRNA levels were downregulated in KIRC (kidney renal clear cell carcinoma) tissues than normal tissues (FRAS1, P < 0.0001; FREM1, P < 0.0001, FREM2, P = 0.0001), respectively. FRAS1, FREM1 and FREM2 were significantly different in histologic grade, patho- logic stage and pathologic T (all P < 0.001). Low FRAS1, FREM1 and FREM2 expression were correlated to worsen overall survival (all P < 0.01), and Low FREM1 and FREM2 expression had worse relapse-free survival (FREM1, P = 0.0113; FREM2, P = 0.0424). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that FREM2 was an independent prog- nostic factor for overall survival. Taken together, FREM2 expression is an independent predictor of poor survival in renal clear cell carcinoma and is positively associated with advanced stage, high histologic grade.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vivo Dual RNA-Seq Analysis Reveals the Basis for Differential Tissue Tropism of Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus Pneumoniae
    In Vivo Dual RNA-Seq Analysis Reveals the Basis for Differential Tissue Tropism of Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae Vikrant Minhas,1,4 Rieza Aprianto,2,4 Lauren J. McAllister,1 Hui Wang,1 Shannon C. David,1 Kimberley T. McLean,1 Iain Comerford,3 Shaun R. McColl,3 James C. Paton,1,5,6,* Jan-Willem Veening,2,5 and Claudia Trappetti,1,5 Supplementary Information Supplementary Table 1. Pneumococcal differential gene expression in the lungs 6 h post-infection, 9-47-Ear vs 9-47M. Genes with fold change (FC) greater than 2 and p < 0.05 are shown. FC values highlighted in blue = upregulated in 9-47-Ear, while values highlighted in red = upregulated in 9- 47M. Locus tag in 9-47- Product padj FC Ear Sp947_chr_00844 Sialidase B 3.08E-10 313.9807 Sp947_chr_02077 hypothetical protein 4.46E-10 306.9412 Sp947_chr_00842 Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2.22E-09 243.4822 Sp947_chr_00841 N-acetylneuraminate lyase 4.53E-09 227.7963 scyllo-inositol 2-dehydrogenase Sp947_chr_00845 (NAD(+)) 4.36E-09 221.051 Sp947_chr_00848 hypothetical protein 1.19E-08 202.7867 V-type sodium ATPase catalytic subunit Sp947_chr_00853 A 1.29E-06 100.5411 Sp947_chr_00846 Beta-glucoside kinase 3.42E-06 98.18951 Sp947_chr_00855 V-type sodium ATPase subunit D 8.34E-06 85.94879 Sp947_chr_00851 V-type sodium ATPase subunit C 2.50E-05 72.46612 Sp947_chr_00843 hypothetical protein 2.17E-05 65.97758 Sp947_chr_00839 HTH-type transcriptional regulator RpiR 3.09E-05 61.28171 Sp947_chr_00854 V-type sodium ATPase subunit B 1.32E-06 50.86992 Sp947_chr_00120 hypothetical protein 3.00E-04
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Cardiovascular Findings in Association with a POMT2
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2014) 22, 486–491 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1018-4813/14 www.nature.com/ejhg ARTICLE Novel cardiovascular findings in association with a POMT2 mutation: three siblings with a-dystroglycanopathy Hugo R Martinez*,1, William J Craigen2, Monika Ummat3, Adekunle M Adesina4, Timothy E Lotze3 and John L Jefferies5 Dystroglycanopathies are a genetically heterogeneous subset of congenital muscular dystrophies that exhibit autosomal recessive inheritance and are characterized by abnormal glycosylation of a-dystroglycan. In particular, POMT2 (protein O-mannosyltransferase-2) mutations have been identified in congenital muscular dystrophy patients with a wide range of clinical involvement, ranging from the severe muscle-eye-brain disease and Walker–Warburg syndrome to limb girdle muscular dystrophy without structural brain or ocular involvement. Cardiovascular disease is thought to be uncommon in congenital muscular dystrophy, with rare reports of cardiac involvement. We describe three brothers aged 21, 19, and 17 years with an apparently homozygous POMT2 mutation who all presented with congenital muscular dystrophy, intellectual disabilities, and distinct cardiac abnormalities. All three brothers were homozygous for a p.Tyr666Cys missense mutation in exon 19 of the POMT2 gene. On screening echocardiograms, all siblings demonstrated significant dilatation of the aortic root and depressed left ventricular systolic function and/or left ventricular wall motion abnormalities. Our report is the first to document an association between POMT2 mutations and aortopathy with concomitant depressed left ventricular systolic function. On the basis of our findings, we suggest patients with POMT2 gene mutations be screened not only for myocardial dysfunction but also for aortopathy.
    [Show full text]
  • Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation from a Neurological Perspective
    brain sciences Review Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation from a Neurological Perspective Justyna Paprocka 1,* , Aleksandra Jezela-Stanek 2 , Anna Tylki-Szyma´nska 3 and Stephanie Grunewald 4 1 Department of Pediatric Neurology, Faculty of Medical Science in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland 2 Department of Genetics and Clinical Immunology, National Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, 01-138 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 3 Department of Pediatrics, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, The Children’s Memorial Health Institute, W 04-730 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 4 NIHR Biomedical Research Center (BRC), Metabolic Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, University College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-606-415-888 Abstract: Most plasma proteins, cell membrane proteins and other proteins are glycoproteins with sugar chains attached to the polypeptide-glycans. Glycosylation is the main element of the post- translational transformation of most human proteins. Since glycosylation processes are necessary for many different biological processes, patients present a diverse spectrum of phenotypes and severity of symptoms. The most frequently observed neurological symptoms in congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) are: epilepsy, intellectual disability, myopathies, neuropathies and stroke-like episodes. Epilepsy is seen in many CDG subtypes and particularly present in the case of mutations
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1. Pain and PTSS Associated Genes (N = 604
    Supplementary Table 1. Pain and PTSS associated genes (n = 604) compiled from three established pain gene databases (PainNetworks,[61] Algynomics,[52] and PainGenes[42]) and one PTSS gene database (PTSDgene[88]). These genes were used in in silico analyses aimed at identifying miRNA that are predicted to preferentially target this list genes vs. a random set of genes (of the same length). ABCC4 ACE2 ACHE ACPP ACSL1 ADAM11 ADAMTS5 ADCY5 ADCYAP1 ADCYAP1R1 ADM ADORA2A ADORA2B ADRA1A ADRA1B ADRA1D ADRA2A ADRA2C ADRB1 ADRB2 ADRB3 ADRBK1 ADRBK2 AGTR2 ALOX12 ANO1 ANO3 APOE APP AQP1 AQP4 ARL5B ARRB1 ARRB2 ASIC1 ASIC2 ATF1 ATF3 ATF6B ATP1A1 ATP1B3 ATP2B1 ATP6V1A ATP6V1B2 ATP6V1G2 AVPR1A AVPR2 BACE1 BAMBI BDKRB2 BDNF BHLHE22 BTG2 CA8 CACNA1A CACNA1B CACNA1C CACNA1E CACNA1G CACNA1H CACNA2D1 CACNA2D2 CACNA2D3 CACNB3 CACNG2 CALB1 CALCRL CALM2 CAMK2A CAMK2B CAMK4 CAT CCK CCKAR CCKBR CCL2 CCL3 CCL4 CCR1 CCR7 CD274 CD38 CD4 CD40 CDH11 CDK5 CDK5R1 CDKN1A CHRM1 CHRM2 CHRM3 CHRM5 CHRNA5 CHRNA7 CHRNB2 CHRNB4 CHUK CLCN6 CLOCK CNGA3 CNR1 COL11A2 COL9A1 COMT COQ10A CPN1 CPS1 CREB1 CRH CRHBP CRHR1 CRHR2 CRIP2 CRYAA CSF2 CSF2RB CSK CSMD1 CSNK1A1 CSNK1E CTSB CTSS CX3CL1 CXCL5 CXCR3 CXCR4 CYBB CYP19A1 CYP2D6 CYP3A4 DAB1 DAO DBH DBI DICER1 DISC1 DLG2 DLG4 DPCR1 DPP4 DRD1 DRD2 DRD3 DRD4 DRGX DTNBP1 DUSP6 ECE2 EDN1 EDNRA EDNRB EFNB1 EFNB2 EGF EGFR EGR1 EGR3 ENPP2 EPB41L2 EPHB1 EPHB2 EPHB3 EPHB4 EPHB6 EPHX2 ERBB2 ERBB4 EREG ESR1 ESR2 ETV1 EZR F2R F2RL1 F2RL2 FAAH FAM19A4 FGF2 FKBP5 FLOT1 FMR1 FOS FOSB FOSL2 FOXN1 FRMPD4 FSTL1 FYN GABARAPL1 GABBR1 GABBR2 GABRA2 GABRA4
    [Show full text]