DOCSLIB.ORG

Phase ONE Environmental Site Assessment 2370 Walkley Road, Ottawa, Ontario CP-17-0360

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phase ONE Environmental Site Assessment 2370 Walkley Road, Ottawa, Ontario CP-17-0360 PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 2370 WALKLEY ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO Project No.: CP-17-0360 Prepared for: Farm Boy Company Inc. 1427 Ogilvie Road Ottawa, ON K1J 8M7 Prepared by: McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. 115 Walgreen Rd. Carp, ON K0A 1L0 June 4, 2019 Executive Summary McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. (McIntosh Perry) was retained by Farm Boy Company Inc. (Farm Boy) to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at 2370 Walkley Road in Ottawa, Ontario (‘the Site’). The Site consists of a slab on grade one-storey building, housing commercial business. The remainder of the site is mostly paved parking areas with some vegetated areas along the boundaries of the Site. The building is currently occupied by Farm Boy as a warehouse and tenants: DND, Royal Moving, Iron Mountain, Crown Restoration, World Pac. The area of the site is approximately 8.4 hectare (ha). It is understood that this Phase One ESA is being completed as a component of the City of Ottawa site plan submission process, in support of an application to add additional parking areas to the northern portion of the property. This area of proposed additional parking spaces will be referred to as ‘the Project Area,’ which is approximately 0.24 ha. This report includes information for the entire property, with a focus on the Project Area. The Phase One ESA has been prepared in general accordance with the requirements of Ontario Regulation (O.Reg.) 153/04 as amended. The report is also in general compliance with “Phase One Environmental Site Assessment”, Canadian Standards Association (CSA) standard CSA Z768-01, reaffirmed 2016. The site is currently used for commercial purposes; the intended future use of the Site is unchanged. Therefore, the addition of more parking spaces is not considered a more sensitive land use therefore a Record of Site Condition (RSC) will be not required. Based on a review of aerial photographs and historical information, the Site appears to have been originally developed for commercial use in the in the early 1970s. The northern portion of the building was constructed in approximately 1973, the central portion of the building was constructed in 1978 and the southern portion of the building was constructed in 2002. Several PCAs were identified on the subject property and in the Phase One ESA Study Area (as summarized in Table 9 of this report). The on-site PCA (the presence of two former below ground fuel storage tanks (USTs) located to the northeast and northwest of the building (i.e. within proximity to the Project Area) and a possible tank of unknown location) represent an APEC as per Table 2 (PCAs) of O.Reg.153/04, as amended. One off-site PCAs, a dry cleaning facility located at 2233 St. Laurent Blvd. represents an APEC to the subject property, as it is located up-gradient of the Site and is known to have uses Tetrachloroethene. Because the PCA identified on-site (former USTs) represents an APEC to the Site and Project Area, under the requirements of O.Reg. 153/04, a Phase 2 ESA is recommended to determine soil and groundwater conditions in the Project Area. i Phase ONE Environmental Site Assessment 2370 Walkley Road, Ottawa, Ontario CP-17-0360 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Phase 1 Property Information ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Property Identification .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.2 Property Ownership and Contact Details ................................................................................................... 1 1.1.3 Current and Proposed Future Uses ............................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Surrounding Land Use ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION ...................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 RECORDS REVIEW ................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 General ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 3.1.1 Phase One Study Area Determination ....................................................................................................... 4 3.1.2 First Developed Use Determination........................................................................................................... 4 3.1.3 Fire Insurance Plans .................................................................................................................................. 4 3.1.4 Chain of Title ............................................................................................................................................. 5 3.1.5 Reports by Others ..................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.6 City Directories ......................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Environmental Source Information .................................................................................................................... 6 3.2.1 Databases Searched .................................................................................................................................. 6 3.2.2 Database Findings Relevant to the Phase 1 ESA ......................................................................................... 8 3.2.3 MECP Freedom of Information Request ...................................................................................................18 3.2.4 TSSA Information Request ........................................................................................................................19 3.2.5 City of Ottawa Request ............................................................................................................................19 3.2.6 Aerial Photographs and Satellite Images ..................................................................................................19 3.2.7 Topography..............................................................................................................................................20 3.2.8 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................20 3.2.9 Geology ...................................................................................................................................................20 3.2.10 Hydrogeology...........................................................................................................................................21 3.2.11 Fill Materials ............................................................................................................................................21 3.2.12 Water Bodies and Areas of Natural Significance .......................................................................................21 ii Phase ONE Environmental Site Assessment 2370 Walkley Road, Ottawa, Ontario CP-17-0360 3.2.13 Well Records ............................................................................................................................................21 3.3 Site Operating Records.....................................................................................................................................21 4.0 INTERVIEWS ......................................................................................................................................... 22 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ........................................................................................................................ 24 5.1 General Requirements .....................................................................................................................................24 5.1.1 Qualifications of the Assessors .................................................................................................................24 5.1.2 Weather Conditions at Time of Inspection ...............................................................................................24 5.1.3 Property Occupancy/Use Status at Time of Inspection .............................................................................25 5.1.4 Site Photographs ......................................................................................................................................25 5.2 Specific Observations at the Phase One Property..............................................................................................25 5.2.1 Structures and Other Improvements ........................................................................................................25 5.2.2 Below Ground Structures .........................................................................................................................25 5.2.3 Storage Tanks ..........................................................................................................................................25
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix 5 Station Descriptions And
    Appendix 5 Station Descriptions and Technical Overview Stage 2 light rail transit (LRT) stations will follow the same standards, design principles, and connectivity and mobility requirements as Stage 1 Confederation Line. Proponent Teams were instructed, through the guidelines outlined in the Project Agreement (PA), to design stations that will integrate with Stage 1, which include customer facilities, accessibility features, and the ability to support the City’s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) goals for public transit and ridership growth. The station features planned for the Stage 2 LRT Project will be designed and built on these performance standards which include: Barrier-free path of travel to entrances of stations; Accessible fare gates at each entrance, providing easy access for customers using mobility devices or service animals; Tactile wayfinding tiles will trace the accessible route through the fare gates, to elevators, platforms and exits; Transecure waiting areas on the train platform will include accessible benches and tactile/Braille signs indicating the direction of service; Tactile warning strips and inter-car barriers to keep everyone safely away from the platform edge; Audio announcements and visual displays for waiting passengers will precede each train’s arrival on the platform and will describe the direction of travel; Service alerts will be shown visually on the passenger information display monitors and announced audibly on the public-address system; All wayfinding and safety signage will be provided following the applicable accessibility standards (including type size, tactile signage, and appropriate colour contrast); Clear, open sight lines and pedestrian design that make wayfinding simple and intuitive; and, Cycling facilities at all stations including shelter for 80 per cent of the provided spaces, with additional space protected to ensure cycling facilities can be doubled and integrated into the station’s footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward 16 Master THEME EN
    Draft Budget 2020 – Ward 16 – River Councillor Riley Brockington Ward investments in 2020 Infrastructure • $31.2 million on infrastructure, including: o $5.5 million to rehabilitate Mooney’s Bay trunk sewer o $6.8 million for integrated road, sewer, and water work along Claymor and Senio avenues o $5.9 million for integrated road, sewer and water work along Larkin Street, Larose Avenue and Lepage Avenue o $8.8 million on structure renewal, including culverts along the Airport Parkway at Walkley Road, and O-Train overpasses at Heron Road, Riverside Drive and Walkley Road o $3.95 million to resurface Riverside Drive between Hunt Club and Walkley roads Transportation • $817 million to fund Stage 2 of Ottawa’s light-rail transit system, extending service to Limebank Station with a link to the Ottawa Macdonald–Cartier International Airport, adding 12 kilometres and eight stations along the Trillium Line, south of Greenboro Station • $125,000 to reconstruct sidewalks and curbs to improve road safety along McCarthy Road between Plante Drive and the rail crossing • $30,000 to apply high-friction asphalt on Prince of Wales Drive at Kochar Drive • $20,000 to repair streetlight cables at Kenzie Street and Leaside Avenue • $6,000 to replace streetlight poles on Riverside Drive at Malhotra Court Parks and facilities • $500,000 on renewal projects, including: o $85,000 for building improvements to the Water Services facility on Clyde Avenue o $80,000 for upgrades to the Deborah Anne Kirwan Pool o $270,000 for concrete walkways and retaining walls at
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Commissions: Threads of an Ottawa Planning History
    Document generated on 09/24/2021 11:42 p.m. Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine A History of Commissions Threads of An Ottawa Planning History Ken Hillis Volume 21, Number 1, October 1992 Article abstract Early planning in Ottawa takes the form of a piece-meal architectural URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1019246ar admixture. On paper there remains a series of largely unrealized proposals DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1019246ar designed to promote an image symbolic of national identity. Successive federal and municipal agencies worked to various degrees of success to augment See table of contents Ottawa's appearance and amenity. British planner Thomas Adams' departure from, and the subsequent demise of the Federal Commission of Conservation in the early 1920's marked a low point in efforts to evolve comprehensive Publisher(s) planning strategies. The career of Noulan Cauchon, first head of the Ottawa Town Planning Commission, aimed to keep the notion of planning alive in the Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine city. Certain of his little-acknowledged proposals bear remarkable similarity to the pre-W.W. II planning efforts of MacKenzie King and Jacques Greber. ISSN Cauchon's legacy endures in proposals which appear to have been incorporated into federal planning activities during the post-war era. 0703-0428 (print) 1918-5138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Hillis, K. (1992). A History of Commissions: Threads of An Ottawa Planning History. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 21(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.7202/1019246ar All Rights Reserved © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 1992 This document is protected by copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Synopsis
    Final Draft Road Network Development Report Submitted to the City of Ottawa by IBI Group September 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Report Structure .................................................................................................. 3 2. Background Information ...................................................................... 4 2.1 The TRANS Screenline System ......................................................................... 4 2.2 The TRANS Forecasting Model ......................................................................... 4 2.3 The 2008 Transportation Master Plan ............................................................... 7 2.4 Progress Since 2008 ........................................................................................... 9 Community Design Plans and Other Studies ................................................................. 9 Environmental Assessments ........................................................................................ 10 Approvals and Construction .......................................................................................... 10 3. Needs and Opportunities ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ottawa Transportation Report.Pdf
    OTTAWA THE IMPACT OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ON HOUSING VALUES IN THE OTTAWA REGION Don R Campbell, Senior Analyst Melanie Reuter, Director of Research Allyssa Epp, Research Analyst WWW.REINCANADA.COM AUTHORS Don R. Campbell, Senior Analyst, REIN Ltd Melanie Reuter, Director of Research, REIN Ltd Allyssa Fischer, Research Analyst, REIN Ltd © The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd. 6 – 27250 58 Cr Langley, BC V4W 3W7 Tel (604) 856-2825 Fax (604) 856-0091 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Page: www.reincanada.com Important Disclaimer: This Report, or any seminars or updates given in relation thereto, is sold, or otherwise provided, on the understanding that the authors – Don R. Campbell, Melanie Reuter, Allyssa Fischer, and The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd and their instructors, are not responsible for any results or results of any actions taken in reliance upon any information contained in this report, or conveyed by way of the said seminars, nor for any errors contained therein or presented thereat or omissions in relation thereto. It is further understood that the said authors and instructors do not purport to render legal, accounting, tax, investment, financial planning or other professional advice. The said authors and instructors hereby disclaim all and any liability to any person, whether a purchaser of this Report, a student of the said seminars, or otherwise, arising in respect of this Report, or the said seminars, and of the consequences of anything done or purported to be done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or part, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Report or the said seminars.
    [Show full text]
  • Lenten Penance Services & Confession Times 2020
    Archdiocese of Ottawa – Lenten Penance Services & Confession Times 2020 1 DATE TIME PARISH Tues., March 3 7:00pm St. John the Apostle, 2340 Baseline Road Tues., March 3 7:00pm St. Basil, 940 Rex Avenue Wed., March 18 7:00 – 9:00pm St. Isidore, 1135 March Road Wed., March 18 7:00pm Queen of the Most Holy Rosary, 20 Grant Street Fri., March 20 7:00pm St. Augustine, 1060 Baseline Road Sat., March 21 1:30pm Sheng Shen (Chinese), 1187 Michael Street North Tues., March 24 7:00pm Holy Canadian Martyrs, 100 Main Street Tues., March 24 7:00 – 9:00pm Holy Cross, 685 Walkley Road Tues., March 24 7:30pm Holy Korean Martyrs (Korean), 254 Argyle Avenue Wed., March 25 7:00pm Holy Name of Mary, 134 Bridge Street, Almonte Wed., March 25 7:00pm St. Michael, Corkery (at Holy Name of Mary, 134 Bridge Street, Almonte) Wed., March 25 7:00pm St. Peter Celestine (at Holy Name of Mary, 134 Bridge Street, Almonte) Wed., March 25 7:00 – 9:00pm Holy Redeemer, 44 Rothesay Drive Wed., March 25 7:00pm St. Leonard, 5332 Long Island Road, Manotick Wed., March 25 7:00pm St. Brigid, Manotick at St. Leonard, 5332 Long Island Road Wed., March 25 7:00pm St. John the Evangelist at St. Leonard, 5332 Long Island Road Wed., March 25 7:00pm Our Lady of the Miraculous Medal, 17 First Avenue, Russell Thurs., March 26 7:00pm Resurrection of Our Lord, 1940 Saunderson Drive Thurs., March 26 7:00pm St. Peter, 1640 Heatherington Road Fri., March 27 7:00pm Good Shepherd, 3092 Innes Road Archdiocese of Ottawa – Lenten Penance Services & Confession Times 2020 2 Fri., March 27 9:30am – 12:00pm; 4:00 – 6:00pm Sagrada Familia (Hispanic), 152 Glenora Avenue Sat., March 28 3:00 – 4:15pm Immaculate Heart of Mary, 1758 Alta Vista Drive Sat., March 28 10:00am - 1:30pm St.
    [Show full text]
  • Where to Find: Cookin' Greens Chopped Spinach 500G
    WHERE TO FIND: COOKIN' GREENS CHOPPED SPINACH 500G Store Name Store Address City Postal Code Province LOBLAWS STORES- FROZEN VEGETABLE AISLE - - - - ALL LONGO’S STORES- FROZEN VEGETABLE AISLE - - - - ALL SOBEY’S ATLANTIC CANADA STORES- FROZEN VEGETABLE AISLE - - - - BLUSH LANE ORGANIC MARKET 3000 10 ASPEN STONE SW CALGARY T3H 0K3 AB BLUSH LANE ORGANIC MARKET 8135 - 102ND STREET N.W. EDMONTON T6E 4A4 AB BUY LOW FOODS 4919 48TH ST ATHABASCA T0G 0B0 AB COMMUNITY NATURAL FOODS 1304 10 Ave SW CALGARY T3C 0J2 AB COMMUNITY NATURAL FOODS 202 61ST AVE SW CALGARY T2H 0B4 AB COMMUNITY NATURAL FOODS 850 Crowfoot Crescent NW CALGARY T3G 4S3 AB MARKET 17 #102 2505 17 AVE SW CALGARY T3E 7V3 AB MRS. GREEN'S 100-4916 - 130TH AVE, SE CALGARY T2Z 0B2 AB NO FRILLS 10467 - 80TH AVENUE NW EDMONTON T6E 1V1 AB NUTTER'S BULK & NATURAL FOOD 5250 22 St RED DEER T4R 2T4 AB PLANET ORGANIC 12120 JASPER AVE EDMONTON T5N 3J8 AB 100-10233 ELBOW DRIVE PLANET ORGANIC SW CALGARY T2W 1E8 AB PLANET ORGANIC 4625 VARSITY DR CALGARY T3A 0Z9 AB PLANET ORGANIC 7917 104ST EDMONTON T6E 4E1 AB SUNTERRA MARKET 803 49TH AVE SW CALGARY T2S 1G8 AB 1 WILLOW NATURAL FOODS 1419 A - 9TH AVE SE CALGARY T2G 0T4 AB YOUR INDEPENDENT GROCER 16 SUPERIOR STREET DEVON T9G 1Z1 AB YOUR INDEPENDENT GROCER 4431 - 4TH AVENUE EDSON T7E 1Z1 AB YOUR INDEPENDENT GROCER 10851 - 100TH STREET WESTLOCK T7P 2R5 AB 7 STAR ORGANICS 318 SKEENA STREET VANCOUVER V5K 5A6 BC BUDGET FOODS #15 4857 ELLIOT ST DELTA V4K 2X7 BC BUY LOW FOODS 9141 MAIN STREET OSOYOOS V0H 1V0 BC BUY LOW FOODS 105 - 34017 97TH ST OLIVER V0H 1T0 BC BUY LOW FOODS 370 E Broadway VANCOUVER V5T 4G8 BC BUY LOW FOODS 359 MURTLE CRESCENT CLEARWATER V0E 1N1 BC BUY LOW FOODS 4647 Johnston Rd PORT ALBERNI V9Y 5M5 BC BUY LOW FOODS 14865 - 108TH AVENUE SURRYE V3R 1W2 BC NEW BUY LOW FOODS 555-6TH STREET WESTMINSTER V3L 5H1 BC 117-8850 WALNUT GROVE BUY LOW FOODS DR LANGLEY V1M 2C9 BC CHOICES MARKET 8683 10TH AVE BURNABY V3N 2S9 BC CHOICES MARKET 1045 COMMERCIAL DRIVE VANCOUVER V5L 3X1 BC CHOICES MARKET 1937 HARVEY AVE KELOWNA V1Y 6G5 BC CHOICES MARKET 2627 WEST 16TH AVE.
    [Show full text]
  • 140 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    140 bus time schedule & line map 140 Billings Bridge View In Website Mode The 140 bus line (Billings Bridge) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Billings Bridge: 9:19 AM - 3:06 PM (2) Heron Park: 9:02 AM - 2:49 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 140 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 140 bus arriving. Direction: Billings Bridge 140 bus Time Schedule 25 stops Billings Bridge Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 9:19 AM - 3:06 PM Walkley / Ryder 1871 Walkley Road, Ottawa Tuesday 9:19 AM - 3:06 PM Walkley / Heron Wednesday 9:19 AM - 3:06 PM 1833 Walkley Road, Ottawa Thursday 9:19 AM - 3:06 PM Walkley / Holly Friday 9:19 AM - 3:06 PM 1635 Walkley Road, Ottawa Saturday 10:10 AM - 5:40 PM Walkley / Heron Walkley / Ad. 1680 Walkley / Heatherington 140 bus Info 1581 Walkley Road, Ottawa Direction: Billings Bridge Stops: 25 Walkley / Ad. 1570 Trip Duration: 14 min 144 Reardon Private, Ottawa Line Summary: Walkley / Ryder, Walkley / Heron, Walkley / Holly, Walkley / Heron, Walkley / Ad. 1680, Baycrest / Cedarwood Walkley / Heatherington, Walkley / Ad. 1570, Baycrest Drive, Ottawa Baycrest / Cedarwood, Baycrest / Heron, Heron / Baycrest, Heron / Finn, Heron / Alta Vista, Heron / Baycrest / Heron Evans, Heron / Bank, Heron / Gilles, Clementine / 1530 Heron Road, Ottawa Heron, Clementine / Richard, Clementine / Guertin, Clementine / Rockingham, Clementine / Belanger, Heron / Baycrest Belanger / Clementine, Bank / Lamira, Bank / Kilborn 1490 Heron Road, Ottawa Pathway-
    [Show full text]
  • Report Template
    1 Report to/Rapport au : Transportation Committee Comité des transports November 27, 2012 27 novembre 2012 Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe, Planning and Infrastructure/Urbanisme et Infrastructure Contact Person / Personne ressource: Bob Streicher, Acting Manager/Gestionnaire par intérim, Transportation Planning/Planification des transports, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424 x 22723, [email protected] CITY WIDE / À L’ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE Ref N°: ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0260 SUBJECT: JOINT STUDY TO ASSESS CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURES ON THE NATIONAL CAPITAL GREENBELT – STUDY REPORT OBJET : ÉTUDE CONJOINTE VISANT À ÉVALUER LES EFFETS CUMULATIFS DES INFRASTRUCTURES DE TRANSPORT SUR LA CEINTURE DE VERDURE DE LA CAPITALE NATIONALE – RAPPORT D’ÉTUDE REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That the Transportation Committee receive this report for information. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des Transports prenne connaissance de ce rapport. BACKGROUND The purpose of this study undertaken in partnership with the National Capital Commission (NCC) was to identify projects within the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) and other transportation projects that have emerged since the completion of the TMP that could have an impact on the environmental integrity of the federal Greenbelt lands. By examining the cumulative effects of the construction of this infrastructure on the Greenbelt lands, a framework now has been established to ensure that the associated Environmental Assessments (EAs) that require federal approval will move forward more expediently. 2 One of the NCC’s mandates is to protect the Greenbelt. Current practice has been that the NCC only comments or provides input on projects that are identified in its Greenbelt Master Plan (GBMP).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Archaeological Reports
    APPENDIX C ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORTS January 15, 2016 ORIGINAL REPORT Archaeological Overview of the Proposed O-Train Extension, Greenboro Station to Riverside South, Ottawa, Ontario Submitted to: Peter Steacy, P.Eng. MMM Group Limited 1145 Hunt Club Road, Suite 300 Ottawa, Ontario K1V 0Y3 Report Number: 1401140 (5000) Distribution: 1 e-copy - MMM Group Limited REPORT 1 copy - Golder Associates Ltd. ARCHAEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW O-TRAIN EXTENSION - GREENBORO STATION TO RIVERSIDE SOUTH Executive Summary The Executive Summary highlights key points from this Archaeological Overview only, for complete information and findings as well as limitations, the reader should examine the complete report. MMM Group Limited (MMM) retained Golder Associates Limited (Golder) to undertake an Archaeological Overview of the proposed O-Train Extension including a section which extends from Greenboro Station to Riverside South (Bowesville Road). The section is located in the historic Township of Gloucester, Carleton County, City of Ottawa, within parts of Lots 3 to 19 Concession 3, and Lots 18 and 19 Gore between Concession 2 and 3. The objectives of this Archaeological Overview will be to identify previous archaeological work conducted in the area and to provide recommendations, based on the previous work, as to what further archaeological assessments may be necessary, such as Stage 1, 2, 3 or 4 assessments. The overview will provides maps indicating areas of: previous archaeological study, registered archaeological sites, and recommendations for further archaeological assessment. A pre-contact and historical summary of the east Ottawa area has been provided for context, as well as three informative historical maps dating to 1825, 1863 and 1879.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 8 Number 7
    Lansdowne Park and Aberdeen Pavilion Up for Grabs by Paulette Roberge "I'm not against Michèle MacK-1 the Aberdeen Pavilion public housing, but I before the revise,i (formerly the Cow About 150 Glebe residents attended a meeting object to the location. recommendations are Palace) and the June 23 to voice their concern over the future Central The Lcids need a nice submitted. Canada of Lansdowne Park. Some spoke in favour of Exhibition. as they have Sandra Hawkins feels The City retaining the northeast section of Lansdowne as playground Commission no place to go," she the proposal si,ould re- has completed a a park, while others supported-a non-profit $20,000 said. Ms Dobbin felt flect all the commun- study on the housing proposal. feasibi- the high incidence of ity's needs, and not lity of repairing and Several members of the Glebe Tenants' As- vandalism was due partly just satisfy a specific renovating the ailap- sociation. were in attendance to argue that to the lack of a well- group. idated Pavilion. Its the Glebe, which enjoys a diversity of socio- equipped park. The possibility of recommendations are economic groups and lifestyles, needs the housing in the park still forthcoming. mechanism of non-profit housing to permit The Citizet's Com- remains uncertain with lower income families to remain and parti- mittee of the Glebe decisions still to be Lansdowne cont'd. page 2 cipate in the community. Sandra Hawkins, a Neighbourhood Study made for the fate of member of the Association, says housing would -and the Lansdowne be constructed behind the fire station, where Development Advisory existing buildings are an eyesore to those c,-,mmittee (LDAC) rec- living on O'Connor Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Could Aldi Succeed in Canada? Sonia Boyer [email protected]
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Global Manager Abroad Global Management Spring 2018 Could Aldi Succeed in Canada? Sonia Boyer [email protected] Justin Carr [email protected] Sam Loomis [email protected] Maria Prothero [email protected] Quentin Street [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/glbm400 Recommended Citation Boyer, Sonia; Carr, Justin; Loomis, Sam; Prothero, Maria; Street, Quentin; and Chen, Jimmy, "Could Aldi Succeed in Canada?" (2018). Global Manager Abroad. 7. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/glbm400/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Global Management at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Global Manager Abroad by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Sonia Boyer, Justin Carr, Sam Loomis, Maria Prothero, Quentin Street, and Jimmy Chen This article is available at Bucknell Digital Commons: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/glbm400/7 Could Aldi Succeed in Canada? GLBM 400 Professor Chen Sonia Boyer, Justin Carr, Sam Loomis, Maria Prothero, and Quentin Street TABLE OF CONTENTS Contextual Information 2 History of Aldi 2 Research Questions 5 Competitive Landscape 6 United States 7 Canada 8 Comprehensive Venture Analysis 11 Cultural and Social Aspects 12 Political Aspects 14 Economic Aspects 14 Recommendations 15 References 18 Appendices 20 1 1. CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1.1 History of Aldi Initial Growth In 1946 a pair of brothers named Karl and Theo Albrecht founded the supermarket chain Aldi in Essen, Germany. The storefront, a local grocery store, had been in operation since 1913 when the Albrecht’s mother began the business (“Company Profile”, 2018).
    [Show full text]