DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Systematic Position of Hymenoloma (Bryophyta) О Систематическом Положении Рода Hymenoloma (Bryophyta) Vladimir E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the Systematic Position of Hymenoloma (Bryophyta) О Систематическом Положении Рода Hymenoloma (Bryophyta) Vladimir E Arctoa (2016) 25: 119-130 doi: 10.15298/arctoa.25.10 ON THE SYSTEMATIC POSITION OF HYMENOLOMA (BRYOPHYTA) О СИСТЕМАТИЧЕСКОМ ПОЛОЖЕНИИ РОДА HYMENOLOMA (BRYOPHYTA) VLADIMIR E. FEDOSOV1, ALINA V. F EDOROVA2, ALEXEY V. T ROITSKY2, VERA K. BOBROVA2 & MICHAEL S. IGNATOV1,3 ВЛАДИМИР Э. ФЕДОСОВ1, АЛИНА В. ФЕДОРОВА2, АЛЕКСЕЙ В. ТРОИЦКИЙ2, ВЕРА К. БОБРОВА2, МИХАИЛ С. ИГНАТОВ1,3 Abstract Molecular phylogenetic analyses based on nad5, rps4 and trnL-F sequences suggest the position of the genus Hymenoloma in the order Scouleriales. This order includes two monogeneric families: Scouleriaceae, with aquatic plants, and Drummondiaceae that includes mostly epiphytic mosses. Mainly epilithic Hymenoloma strongly differs from both of them, as well as they differ from each other, thus a new family Hymenolomataceae is suggested for this genus. Morphologically, Hymenoloma has no unique characters, although its outstanding plasticity provides some explanation of its relationships with Scouleria and Drummondia. Резюме Согласно данным молекулярно-филогенетического анализа, основанного на последова- тельностях генов nad5, rps4 и trnL-F, род Hymenoloma следует относить к порядку Scouleriales. Этот порядок включает два семейства, в каждом из которых по одному роду: Scouleriaceae, пред- ставители которого растут в воде, и Drummondiaceae, куда входят эпифитные виды. Виды рода Hymenoloma растут преимущественно на каменистых субстратах и резко отличаются от видов из обоих других семейств порядка, которые, в свою очередь, совершенно не похожи друг на друга. Поскольку род Hymenoloma не представляется возможным включить ни в одно из двух семейств порядка по морфологическим признакам, то описывается новое семейство Hymenolomataceae. Этот род не имеет каких-либо уникальных морфологических признаков; с другой стороны, его выдающаяся морфологическая пластичность позволяет объяснить родство со Scouleria и Drummondia. KEYWORDS: Dicranidae, mosses, nad5, rps4, trnL-F, Scouleriales, molecular phylogenetics INTRODUCTION the system of Brotherus (1924). Reimers argued his de- The genus Hymenoloma has been installed by Dusén cision by complex costa structure with guide cells and (1905) for one Patagonian species, H. nordenskjoeldii stereid bands, as well as non Seligerioid peristome, as Dusén. Brotherus (1924) accepted it in the Seligeriaceae the latter was described by Brotherus. and also added to this genus three other species from However, when the attention to structural botany re- Subantarctic islands and southern South America, de- vived in 1970s, it resulted, among others, in the discov- scribed originally in the genera Blindia Bruch et al., Di- ery of considerable distinction between Seligeria-type and cranoweisia Milde, and Verrucidens Cardot. Reimers Dicranum-type of peristome (Edwards, 1979, 1984). As (1936) synonymized Hymenoloma with Dicranoweisia a consequence, the position of Seligeriaceae was reeval- (fam. Dicranaceae), bringing the former genus to the long uated and a separate order was established for its accom- oblivion. This decision had been invariably followed by modation (Nyholm, 1987; Anderson et al., 1990). bryologists up to 1990s. Ochyra (1993, 1998) was the first who noticed a dis- The transfer from Seligeriaceae to Dicranaceae was agreement between the peristome structure of Hymeno- not considered conspicuous, as these two families were loma crispulum (Hedw.) Ochyra, that time called Dicra- placed one by one within the same order Dicranales in noweisia crispula (Hedw.) Milde, with its position in 1 – Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Biology, Geobotany Dept., Leninskie Gory Str. 1-12, Moscow 119991 Russia – Россия, 119991, Москва, Ленинские Горы, д. 1 стр. 12, Московский государственный университет, биологический факультет, кафедра геоботаники; email: [email protected] & [email protected] 2 – Lomonosov Moscow State University, Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Leninskie Gory 1-40, Moscow 119991 Russia – Россия, 119991, Москва, Ленинские Горы, д. 1 стр. 40, Московский государственный университет, НИИ Физико- химической биологии им. А.Н. Белозерского; e-mail: [email protected] & [email protected] 3 – Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Sciences, Botanicheskaya Str., 4, Moscow 127276 Russia – Россия 127276 Москва, Ботаническая 4, ГБС РАН 120 V.E. FEDOSOV, A.V. FEDOROVA, A.V. TROITSKY, V.K. BOBROVA & M.S. IGNATOV Dicranaceae, and placed Antarctic species, including D. deous-alternate (Bryum pseudotriquetrum (Hedw.) crispula, in the Seligeriaceae. Subsequent studies revealed P.Gaertn., B. Mey. & Scherb., Hedwigia ciliata (Hedw.) that the type of the genus Dicranoweisia, Mediterranean P. Beauv., Hookeria lucens (Hedw.) Sm.) peristomes were D. cirrata (Hedw.) Lindb., is so different from the cos- involved as outgroups. Totally 110 sequences from 37 mopolitan D. crispula, that another generic name is re- specimens representing 35 species were involved into the quired for the group of taxa around D. crispula. This analysis, including 25 sequences of 12 species obtained problem was solved later by Ochyra, as he resurrected de novo. Vouchers of newly sequenced specimens and the genus Hymenoloma, accepting it in the Seligeriaceae GenBank accession numbers of all used sequences are (Ochyra et al., 2003). compiled in Appendix 1. Laboratory protocol was essen- Since the beginning of molecular phylogenetic stud- tially the same as in previous moss studies, described in ies, the close position of Hymenoloma to the Scouleri- detail by, e.g., Fedosov et al. (2016). aceae and Drummondiaceae was revealed, while Dicra- Sequences were aligned manually in Bioedit (Hall, noweisia was found within Rhabdoweisiaceae (Hedder- 1999). Four dataset were built. The first three of them son et al., 2004; Tsubota et al., 2003, 2004). The most correspond to the individual gene alignments, nad5 (1130 comprehensive molecular phylogenetic studies of the bp), rps4 (568 bp) and trnL (624 bp); they were analyzed genus Hymenoloma by Werner et al. (2013) also sup- separately to check their congruence. The fourth dataset ported a remote position of this genus from Dicranowei- represented concatenated rps4 – nad5 – trnL sequences sia. Their analysis placed Hymenoloma within the strong- (2322 positions). Best-fit substitution models were iden- ly supported clade with Scouleria and Drummondia. tified for each gene separately using Partitionfinder V1.1.1 However, their set did not include any Seligeriaceae. An (Lanfear et al., 2012). Best-scoring Maximum Likelihood important point of this study was the inclusion of H. ant- (ML) trees were estimated using RaxML (Stamatakis, arcticum (Müll. Hal.) Ochyra, because H. nordenskjoel- 2006) from 1000 independent searches each starting from dii, the type of the genus Hymenoloma, was synonymized distinct random trees. Robustness of the nodes was as- with this species by Ochyra et al. (2008a). sessed using the thorough bootstrapping algorithm (Felsen- Subsequent wider analyses of haplolepideous mosses stein, 1985) with 1000 iterations. RaxML was performed constantly resolved Hymenoloma in a clade with Scoule- on the Cipres Science Gateway (http://www.phylo.org/por- riaceae or/and Drummondiaceae (Stech et al., 2012; In- tal2), using RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE. oue & Tsubota, 2014; Fedosov et al., 2016). However, no Bayesian Analyses (BA) were performed running two taxonomic implications were made so far, thus Hymeno- parallel analyses in MrBayes (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist, loma has been treated either in the Seligeriaceae (Ochyra 2001). For single gene analyses each run consisted of six et al., 2008a, b), or in the Rhabdoweisiaceae (Goffinet et Markov chains and 5,000,000 generations with default al., 2009; Ignatov et al., 2006; Ros et al., 2013), or in number of swaps chains. For rps4 – nad5 – trnL dataset the Oncophoraceae (Frye & Stech, 2009). the analysis consisted of eight Markov chains and In the present paper we revisit the problem, invoking 50.000.000 generations with the number of swaps chains both molecular and morphological data on the genus set to five was performed. A sampling frequency was one Hymenoloma. tree each 10.000 generations, and the chain temperature MATERIAL AND METHODS was set at 0.02 in all analyses. Convergence of each anal- Molecular phylogenetic study The material used in ysis was evaluated using Tracer1.4.1 (Rambaut & Drum- the present study was sampled from MW and MHA and mond, 2007) to check that all ESS values exceeded 200. supplemented by sequences available in GenBank. As Consensus tree were calculated after omitting the first most species of Hymenoloma occur in Antarctic region, 25% trees as burn-in. The combined dataset was sepa- only two of them, H. crispulum and H. mulahaceni rated into eight unlinked partitions respectively: three (Höhn.) Ochyra (= H. intermedium (J.J. Amann) Ochyra) codon positions of rps4 gene, three codon positions for were involved in present study. For molecular study we coding portion of the nad5 gene, the intron in the nad5 used three markers, mitochondrial nad5, chloroplastic gene and trnL-F gene. Analyses were performed on the rps4 and trnL-F regions, commonly used for molecular- Cipres Science Gateway (http://www.phylo.org/portal2), phylogenetic studies at generic and familial levels. The using tool MrBayes 3.2.2 on XSEDE. dataset was compiled with special attention to former Morphological studies Three structures were in the Dicranaceae, Seligeriaceae, and several lineages of pro- main focus of the study: (1) cuticular papillae on the leaf,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Data on the Moss Genus Hymenoloma (Bryophyta), with Special Reference to H
    Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 2013, 34 (1): 1-18 © 2013 Adac. Tous droits réservés New data on the moss genus Hymenoloma (Bryophyta), with special reference to H. mulahaceni Olaf WERNER a, Susana RAMS b, Jan KUČERA c, Juan LARRAÍN d, Olga M. AFONINA e, Sergio PISA a & Rosa María ROS a* aDepartamento de Biología Vegetal (Botánica), Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, E-30100 Murcia, Spain bEscuela Universitaria de Magisterio “La Inmaculada”, Universidad de Granada, Carretera de Murcia s/n, 18010 Granada, Spain cUniversity of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Branišovská 31, CZ - 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic dUniversidad de Concepción, Departamento de Botánica, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile eKomarov Botanical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor Popov Str. 2, St.-Petersburg 197376, Russia Abstract – A molecular and morphological study using two chloroplast molecular markers (rps4 and trnL-F) was carried out with specimens belonging to Hymenoloma mulahaceni, a species described at the end of the 19th century from the Sierra Nevada Mountains in southern Spain as a member of Oreoweisia. The comparison with Asian, European, and North American material of Dicranoweisia intermedia proved the conspecifity of both taxa, which was corroborated by molecular data. Therefore, the distribution area of H. mulahaceni is extended to U.S.A., Canada, Greenland, and several Asian countries (Armenia, Georgia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan). We also tested the monophyly of Hymenoloma sensu Ochyra et al. (2003), by including in the analysis the Holarctic taxa assigned to the genus together with Chilean material identified as H. antarcticum (putatively synonymous with the type of Hymenoloma) and H.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Botany 29(1):29-41. 2004 Doi
    Systematic Botany 29(1):29-41. 2004 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1600/036364404772973960 Phylogenetic Relationships of Haplolepideous Mosses (Dicranidae) Inferred from rps4 Gene Sequences Terry A. Heddersonad, Donald J. Murrayb, Cymon J. Coxc, and Tracey L. Nowella aBolus Herbarium, Department of Botany, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7701, Republic of South Africa bThe Birmingham Botanical Garden, Westbourne Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 3TR U. K. cDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 dAuthor for Correspondence ( [email protected]) Abstract The haplolepideous mosses (Dicranidae) constitute a large group of ecologically and morphologically diverse species recognised primarily by having peristome teeth with a single row of cells on the dorsal surface. The reduction of sporophytes in numerous moss lineages renders circumscription of the Dicranidae problematic. Delimitation of genera and higher taxa within it has also been difficult. We analyse chloroplast-encoded rps4 gene sequences for 129 mosses, including representatives of nearly all the haplolepideous families and subfamilies, using parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian criteria. The data set includes 59 new sequences generated for this study. With the exception of Bryobartramia, which falls within the Encalyptaceae, the Dicranidae are resolved in all analyses as a monophyletic group including the extremely reduced Archidiales and Ephemeraceae. The monotypic Catoscopium, usually assigned to the Bryidae is consistently resolved as sister to Dicranidae, and this lineage has a high posterior probability under the Bayesian criterion. Within the Dicranidae, a core clade is resolved that comprises most of the species sampled, and all analyses identify a proto-haplolepideous grade of taxa previously placed in various haplolepideous families.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Mosses: What Do They Tell Us About Moss Evolution?
    Bry. Div. Evo. 043 (1): 072–097 ISSN 2381-9677 (print edition) DIVERSITY & https://www.mapress.com/j/bde BRYOPHYTEEVOLUTION Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2381-9685 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.43.1.7 Fossil mosses: What do they tell us about moss evolution? MicHAEL S. IGNATOV1,2 & ELENA V. MASLOVA3 1 Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 2 Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 3 Belgorod State University, Pobedy Square, 85, Belgorod, 308015 Russia �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1520-042X * author for correspondence: �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-6315 Abstract The moss fossil records from the Paleozoic age to the Eocene epoch are reviewed and their putative relationships to extant moss groups discussed. The incomplete preservation and lack of key characters that could define the position of an ancient moss in modern classification remain the problem. Carboniferous records are still impossible to refer to any of the modern moss taxa. Numerous Permian protosphagnalean mosses possess traits that are absent in any extant group and they are therefore treated here as an extinct lineage, whose descendants, if any remain, cannot be recognized among contemporary taxa. Non-protosphagnalean Permian mosses were also fairly diverse, representing morphotypes comparable with Dicranidae and acrocarpous Bryidae, although unequivocal representatives of these subclasses are known only since Cretaceous and Jurassic. Even though Sphagnales is one of two oldest lineages separated from the main trunk of moss phylogenetic tree, it appears in fossil state regularly only since Late Cretaceous, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic and Morphological Notes on Uleobryum Naganoi Kiguchi Et Ale (Pottiaceae, Musci) 1
    HikobiaHikobial4：１４３－１４７．２００４ 14: 143-147.2004 PhylogeneticPhylO窪eneticandmorphOlO=icalmtesⅢＩノルＣＤ〃"剛〃昭肌oiKiguchi and morphological notes on Uleobryum naganoi Kiguchi eteraL(POttiaceae,Musci)’ ale (Pottiaceae, Musci) 1 HIROYUKIHIRoYuKISATQHⅡRoMITsuBoTA,ToMIoYAMAGucHIANDHIRoNoRIDEGucH１ SATO, HIROMI TSUBOTA, TOMIO YAMAGUCHI AND HIRONORI DEGUCHI SATO,SATO,Ｈ､,TsuBoTA,Ｈ､,YAMAGucHI,Ｔ､＆DEGucHI,H2004Phylogeneticandmor- H., TSUBOTA, H., YAMAGUCHI, T. & DEGUCHI, H. 2004. Phylogenetic and mor­ phologicalphologicalnotesonU/eo6Mｲﾉ'z〃αgα"ojKiguchietα/､(Pottiaceae,Musci）Hikobia notes on Uleobryum naganoi Kiguchi et al. (Pottiaceae, Musci). Hikobia 14:l4：１４３－１４７． 143-147. UleobryumＵ/eo6/Ｗｍ〃αgα"ojKiguchiejα/､,endemictoJapanwithalimitednumberofknown naganoi Kiguchi et aI., endemic to Japan with a limited number of known locations,locations,isnewlyreportedffomShikoku,westernJapanThroughcarefUlexamina- is newly reported from Shikoku, western Japan. Through careful examina­ tionoffTeshmaterial,rhizoidalmberfbnnationisconfinnedfbrthefirsttime・The ， tion of fresh material, rhizoidal tuber formation is confirmed for the first time. The phylogeneticphylogeneticpositionofthiscleistocalpousmossisalsoassesseｄｏｎｔｈｅｂａｓｉｓｏｆｍaxi- position of this cleistocarpous moss is also assessed on the basis of maxi­ mummumlikelihoodanalysisof′bcLgenesequences、ThecuITentpositioninthePot- likelihood analysis of rbcL gene sequences. The current position in the Pot­ tiaceaetiaceaeissUpportedandacloserelationshiptoEpheme'ｗｍｓｌｐｊ""/ＯＳ"川ssuggested is supported and a close relationship to
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES FACT SHEET Ryszard's Racomitrium Moss
    SPECIES FACT SHEET Common Name: Ryszard's racomitrium moss Scientific Name: Codriophorus ryszardii Recent synonyms: Racomitrium ryszardii. All reports of Racomitrium aquaticum (= Codriophorus aquaticus) from North America refer to Codriophorus ryszardii. Division: Bryophyta Class: Bryopsida Order: Grimmiales Family: Grimmiaceae Taxonomic Note: All North American records for Codriophorus aquaticus (= Racomitrium aquaticum) have been renamed Codriophorus ryszardii (= Racomitrium ryszardii), and C. aquaticum has been restricted to the Old World (Benarek-Ochyra 2000; Ochyra and Benarek-Ochyra 2004a). Nomenclature used in this species fact sheet follows the conspectus for the Racomitroideae proposed for use in the Bryophyte Flora of North America (Ochyra and Benarek-Ochyra 2004b). Technical Description: Plants trailing or to erect, 1-10 cm long, branched irregularly. Leaves green, yellow-green to blackish below, linear-lanceolate, straight or curved at shoot tips, imbricate when dry, 2- 4 mm long, 0.4-1 mm wide, tapered to a rounded, roughened tip; margins entire, recurved, lacking row of large thin-walled cells at base; costa forming prominent keel at back of leaf, extending nearly to leaf tip and never forming an awn; leaf cells multipapillose, the cell walls sinuose-wavy. Setae 4-8 mm long, twisted clockwise when dry. Capsules 2-3 mm long, cylindrical. Peristome teeth 0.6-0.8 mm long. Distinctive characters: (1) Leaf cells multipapillose, (2) leaves imbricate, strongly keeled and consistently awnless, (3) leaves bright green to yellow-green, (4) peristome 1 mm long, (5) moist shaded rock substrate. Similar species: Codriophorus varius (= Racomitrium varium) is very similar, but (1) usually at least some of its leaves have distinct awns, (2) its peristome teeth are an astonishing 1-1.7 mm long, forming a tepee-shaped cone that is frequently broken, and (3) its habitat on rocks, logs and soil is usually drier than that of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Wetland Classification System – June 1, 2015
    Alberta Wetland Classification System June 1, 2015 ISBN 978-1-4601-2257-0 (Print) ISBN: 978-1-4601-2258-7 (PDF) Title: Alberta Wetland Classification System Guide Number: ESRD, Water Conservation, 2015, No. 3 Program Name: Water Policy Branch Effective Date: June 1, 2015 This document was updated on: April 13, 2015 Citation: Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (ESRD). 2015. Alberta Wetland Classification System. Water Policy Branch, Policy and Planning Division, Edmonton, AB. Any comments, questions, or suggestions regarding the content of this document may be directed to: Water Policy Branch Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development 7th Floor, Oxbridge Place 9820 – 106th Street Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2J6 Phone: 780-644-4959 Email: [email protected] Additional copies of this document may be obtained by contacting: Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Information Centre Main Floor, Great West Life Building 9920 108 Street Edmonton Alberta Canada T5K 2M4 Call Toll Free Alberta: 310-ESRD (3773) Toll Free: 1-877-944-0313 Fax: 780-427-4407 Email: [email protected] Website: http://esrd.alberta.ca Alberta Wetland Classification System Contributors: Matthew Wilson Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Thorsten Hebben Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Danielle Cobbaert Alberta Energy Regulator Linda Halsey Stantec Linda Kershaw Arctic and Alpine Environmental Consulting Nick Decarlo Stantec Environment and Sustainable Resource Development would also
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Treatment of the Genus Campylopus (Musci: Dicranaceae) in Central America Bruce H
    63 Tropical Bryology 1: 63-94, 1989 A preliminary treatment of the genus Campylopus (Musci: Dicranaceae) in Central America Bruce H. Allen Missouri Botanical Garden P.O. Box 299 St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, U.S.A. Abstract. There are 26 species of Campylopus in Central America. They are divided into three groups on the basis of two characters: the presence or absence in the costa of a ventral layer of enlarged, hyaline cells and the presence or absence in the stem of an outer hylodermis. Dicranum costaricensis Bartr. is transferred to Campylopus as C. valerioi nom. nov. Campylopus hoffmanii and C. standleyi are recognized as distinct species. Six new synonyms are proposed: C. straminifolius = C. densicoma; C. costaricensis = C. surinamensis; C. roellii = C. tallulensis; C. donnellii = C. zygodonticarpus; C. tuerckheimii = C. zygodonticarpus; C. sargii = C. zygodonticarpus. The genus Campylopus is a large and taxono- are occupied by groups of species whose characters mically complex group of world-wide distribu- exhibit shades of variation in reticulate tion. Frahm (1988) considers the genus to have combinations. As presently understood, the only originated in the subantarctic region of the world; features common to all species of the genus are: in terms of species numbers the group is most 1. dioicous sexual condition, 2. broad, single, diversified in Central and South America. excurrent costae, 3. estomatate capsules and 4. There is a remarkable amount of variation setae sinuose when moist. found in nearly all characters of Campylopus, and A consideration of the genera near Campylo- as a result the generic limits of the genus are pus makes it apparent that the above character diffuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of New Zealand Mosses
    FLORA OF NEW ZEALAND MOSSES BRACHYTHECIACEAE A.J. FIFE Fascicle 46 – JUNE 2020 © Landcare Research New Zealand Limited 2020. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items, this copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence Attribution if redistributing to the public without adaptation: "Source: Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" Attribution if making an adaptation or derivative work: "Sourced from Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" See Image Information for copyright and licence details for images. CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Fife, Allan J. (Allan James), 1951- Flora of New Zealand : mosses. Fascicle 46, Brachytheciaceae / Allan J. Fife. -- Lincoln, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, 2020. 1 online resource ISBN 978-0-947525-65-1 (pdf) ISBN 978-0-478-34747-0 (set) 1. Mosses -- New Zealand -- Identification. I. Title. II. Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd. UDC 582.345.16(931) DC 588.20993 DOI: 10.7931/w15y-gz43 This work should be cited as: Fife, A.J. 2020: Brachytheciaceae. In: Smissen, R.; Wilton, A.D. Flora of New Zealand – Mosses. Fascicle 46. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln. http://dx.doi.org/10.7931/w15y-gz43 Date submitted: 9 May 2019 ; Date accepted: 15 Aug 2019 Cover image: Eurhynchium asperipes, habit with capsule, moist. Drawn by Rebecca Wagstaff from A.J. Fife 6828, CHR 449024. Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1 Typification...............................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Grimmia (Grimmiaceae, Bryophyta) in the Neotropics
    Grimmia (Grimmiaceae, Bryophyta) in the Neotropics CLAUDIO DELGADILLO-MOYA Instituto de Biología Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Grimmia fuscolutea Hook. Photo by Carmen Loyola. Grimmia (Grimmiaceae, Bryophyta) in the Neotropics Claudio Delgadillo-Moya Diseño de portada y formación: Julio César Montero / D.G. Diana Martínez Diseño: D.G. Julio César Montero / D.G. Diana Martínez Fotografía de portada: Susana Guzmán Fotografía portadilla: Carmen Loyola Primera edición: 1 de octubre de 2015 D.R.©2015 UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, México, Distrito Federal www.unam.mx INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGÍA www.ib.unam.mx ISBN: 978-607-02-7185-4 Prohibida la reproducción total o parcial por cualquier medio sin la autorización escrita del titular de los derechos patrimoniales. Hecho en México Índice PREFACE . 4 INTRODUCTION . 6 MORPHOLOGY AND ANATOMY . 6 ECOLOGY . 8 DISTRIBUTION . 8 SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT . 9 1. Grimmia anodon Bruch & Schimp. 14 2. Grimmia atrata Miel. 16 3. Grimmia austrofunalis Müll. 19 4. Grimmia bicolor Herz. 22 5. Grimmia donniana Sm. 24 6. Grimmia elongata Kaulf. 26 7. Grimmia fuscolutea Hook. 29 8. Grimmia herzogii Broth. 32 9. Grimmia involucrata Card. 34 10. Grimmia laevigata (Brid.) Brid. 37 11. Grimmia lisae De Not. 38 12. Grimmia longirostris Hook. 42 13. Grimmia mexicana Greven. 48 14. Grimmia molesta Muñoz, Ann. 50 15. Grimmia montana Bruch & Schimp. 52 16. Grimmia moxleyi Williams, . 54 17. Grimmia navicularis Herz. 56 18. Grimmia ovalis (Hedw.) Lindb. 59 19. Grimmia pilifera P. Beauv. 62 20. Grimmia pseudoanodon Deguchi, Stud. 65 21. Grimmia pulla Card. 67 22. Grimmia pulvinata (Hedw.) Sm.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 4 Appendices
    Part 4 Appendices HEARD ISLAND AND MCDONALD ISLANDS MARINE RESERVE 139 Appendix 1. Proclamation of Heard Island and McDonald Islands Marine Reserve 140 MANAGEMENT PLAN HEARD ISLAND AND MCDONALD ISLANDS MARINE RESERVE 141 142 MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix 2. Native Fauna of the HIMI Marine Reserve Listed Under the EPBC Act Scientific Name Common Name Birds recorded as breeding Aptenodytes patagonicus king penguin S Catharacta lonnbergi subantarctic skua S Daption capense cape petrel S Diomeda exulans wandering albatross V S M B J A Diomeda melanophrys black–browed albatross S M B A Eudyptes chrysocome southern rockhopper penguin S Eudyptes chrysolophus macaroni penguin S Larus dominicanus kelp gull S Macronectes giganteus southern giant petrel E S M B A Oceanites oceanicus Wilson’s storm petrel S M J Pachyptila crassirostris fulmar prion S Pachyptila desolata Antarctic prion S Pelecanoides georgicus South Georgian diving petrel S Pelecanoides urinatrix common diving petrel S Phalacrocorax atriceps (e) Heard Island cormorant V S Phoebetria palpebrata light mantled sooty albatross S M B A Pygoscelis papua gentoo penguin S Sterna vittata Antarctic tern V S Non–breeding birds Catharacta maccormicki south polar skua S M J Diomedea epomophora southern royal albatross V S M B A Fregetta grallaria white–bellied storm petrel S Fregetta tropica black–bellied storm petrel S Fulmarus glacialoides southern fulmar S Garrodia nereis grey–backed storm petrel S Halobaena caerulea blue petrel V S Macronectes halli northern giant petrel V S M B A Pachyptila belcheri
    [Show full text]
  • New National and Regional Bryophyte Records, 63
    Journal of Bryology ISSN: 0373-6687 (Print) 1743-2820 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yjbr20 New national and regional bryophyte records, 63 L. T. Ellis, O. M. Afonina, I. V. Czernyadjeva, L. A. Konoreva, A. D. Potemkin, V. M. Kotkova, M. Alataş, H. H. Blom, M. Boiko, R. A. Cabral, S. Jimenez, D. Dagnino, C. Turcato, L. Minuto, P. Erzberger, T. Ezer, O. V. Galanina, N. Hodgetts, M. S. Ignatov, A. Ignatova, S. G. Kazanovsky, T. Kiebacher, H. Köckinger, E. O. Korolkova, J. Larraín, A. I. Maksimov, D. Maity, A. Martins, M. Sim-Sim, F. Monteiro, L. Catarino, R. Medina, M. Nobis, A. Nowak, R. Ochyra, I. Parnikoza, V. Ivanets, V. Plášek, M. Philippe, P. Saha, Md. N. Aziz, A. V. Shkurko, S. Ştefănuţ, G. M. Suárez, A. Uygur, K. Erkul, M. Wierzgoń & A. Graulich To cite this article: L. T. Ellis, O. M. Afonina, I. V. Czernyadjeva, L. A. Konoreva, A. D. Potemkin, V. M. Kotkova, M. Alataş, H. H. Blom, M. Boiko, R. A. Cabral, S. Jimenez, D. Dagnino, C. Turcato, L. Minuto, P. Erzberger, T. Ezer, O. V. Galanina, N. Hodgetts, M. S. Ignatov, A. Ignatova, S. G. Kazanovsky, T. Kiebacher, H. Köckinger, E. O. Korolkova, J. Larraín, A. I. Maksimov, D. Maity, A. Martins, M. Sim-Sim, F. Monteiro, L. Catarino, R. Medina, M. Nobis, A. Nowak, R. Ochyra, I. Parnikoza, V. Ivanets, V. Plášek, M. Philippe, P. Saha, Md. N. Aziz, A. V. Shkurko, S. Ştefănuţ, G. M. Suárez, A. Uygur, K. Erkul, M. Wierzgoń & A. Graulich (2020): New national and regional bryophyte records, 63, Journal of Bryology, DOI: 10.1080/03736687.2020.1750930 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2020.1750930 Published online: 18 May 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]