DOCSLIB.ORG

Hawaii-Futures-1991A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hawaii-Futures-1991A JUDICIAL FORESIGHT IN THE HAWAII JUDICIARY Proceedings of the Hawaii Judicial Foresight Congress Honolulu, Hawaii, January 6-8, 1991 Edited by Sohail Inayatullah JUDICIARY, STATE OF HAWAII Published by the Hawaii Judiciary, State of Hawaii, 1994 P.O. Box 2560, Honolulu, Hawaii 96804 The views expressed herein are not necessarily shared by the Hawaii Judiciary or the State of Hawaii. Note to 2008 printing: This version is based on the original electronic files and, to our knowledge, includes all that was contained in the 1994 printing. However, due to changes in technology since then, this Adobe Acrobat file may be formatted slightly differently than the original. MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF JUSTICE As we approach the threshold of a new century, we will be faced with many future challenges. To effectively meet these challenges, the role of the court must evolve along with the needs of the complex society it serves. Both the structure and function of the court needs to grow in order to accommodate the demands of our changing society. Inspired by the national futures conference, Hawaii was the first state to convene a conference specifically designed to address issues and ideas concerning the courts. The product of the 1991 Judicial Foresight Congress has attempted to explore and anticipate the future. These recommendations will be seriously considered in our future planning efforts. It gives me great pleasure to reaffirm our commitment to the delegates of the 1991 Judicial Foresight Congress, the Hawaii State Legislature, and the citizens of Hawaii by publishing these Proceedings . I am confident that the recommendations provided by this conference will give us wisdom and direction for the years ahead. Ronald T. Y. Moon Chief Justice - i - ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS While the efforts of many individuals are necessary to complete a major publication, a few were critical and must be singled out. The Congress itself could not have been held without the dedication of Joy Labez. More than anyone else, the Hawaii Judiciary owes her an unrepayable debt. The Proceedings itself came out because of the skillful and calm coordination of Karen Takahashi and the daily labor of Grace Maeda. Sharon Mendoza and Susan Kaya painstakingly transcribed speeches. Judge Daniel Heely and Clyde Namuo are to be thanked for finding funding for this project and Arlene Lum for her gracious editorial help. This publication itself is a result of over two decades of futures research in the Hawaii Judiciary. For that concerted effort, Lester Cingcade is noteworthy. Without his sustained leadership, the Hawaii courts would have gazed at the future through a rearview mirror. We are thankful to the American Judicature Society for permission to reprint Shirley S. Abrahamson's "The Consumer and the Courts" which originally appeared in Judicature (Volume 74, No. 2, 1990). Different versions of articles in these Proceedings by Clement Bezold, Sharon Rodgers, Wendy Schultz, Frances Zemans, and Paul Alston recently appeared in Futures Research Quarterly (Winter 1993). Francis Wong's, "The Future of the Family Court," appeared in Futures Research Quarterly (Fall 1992). Sohail Inayatullah's introductory essay has also appeared in various versions in Futures Research Quarterly (Fall 1992) as "Preliminary Report of the Hawaii Judiciary Foresight Congress" and in Futures (October 1991) as "Judicial Foresight in the Hawaii Judiciary." Robert Bohrer's essay appeared in Futures (September 1992). - ii - PREFACE Judicial Foresight in the Hawaii Judiciary: Proceedings of the Judicial Foresight Congress is the culmination of years of foresight activities in the Hawaii Judiciary. We believe they bring together some of the best local, national and international writing on court futures. This work is not intended to predict the future but rather to anticipate the range of possible judicial futures ahead and to encourage new visions of the courts that will lead to real immediate short and longer term transformations. These Proceedings are divided into six sections. The first is the "Executive Summary" which presents the scenarios and the recommendations articulated by Congress delegates. The second section describes the goals and processes of the Congress as well as the resultant scenarios and recommendations. Section three consists of the speeches made at the Congress. These are divided into the following areas: "Opening Remarks," "Future of the Courts," "The Future From the Hawaii Perspective," "Science and Technology," "Culturally Appropriate Dispute Resolution Forums," "The World Economy and Hawaii," and "Comments from the Community." To a large degree they reflect the organization of the Congress. Section four lists the scenarios developed by the working group into three categories: scenarios derived from San Antonio national "The Future and the Courts" conference, possible scenarios of the courts, and preferred scenarios of the courts. Section five evaluates the Congress: its successes and its failures. The final section is the appendix which presents the entire list of recommendations, the entire list of recorders and facilitators and the list of participants. We hope that these Proceedings encourage you to creatively envision new futures for the courts and to use these visions to make day to day to routine changes. - iii - TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF JUSTICE. .i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. .ii PREFACE. iii I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 3 II. INTRODUCTION TO FORESIGHT CONGRESS AND PROCEEDINGS. 7 III. SPEECHES A. OPENING REMARKS HERMAN LUM Meeting the Needs of the Present and the Challenges of the Future . 25 PETER ADLER Congress Design and Overview . 29 B. THE FUTURE OF THE AMERICAN COURTS JAMES DATOR Inventing the Future of the Courts and the Courts of the Future: A Futurist's Perspective . .31 FRANCES ZEMANS Inventing the Future of the Courts and the Courts of the Future: An Institutional Perspective . 40 DAVID TEVELIN Thinking Future . .46 GEORGE CHAPLIN Acceptance Speech of the Herbert Harley Award . .51 SHIRLEY ABRAHAMSON The Consumer and the Courts . .54 C. THE FUTURE FROM THE HAWAII COURT'S PERSPECTIVE DANIEL HEELY Designing the Future of the Family Courts . 59 - iv - SHUNICHI KIMURA The View from the Neighbor Islands: Is Honolulu our Future or Can the Neighbor Islands Bypass Honolulu's Problems? . 62 PAUL ALSTON Hawaii's Justice System in 2020: A View from the Bar . 66 SOHAIL INAYATULLAH Hawaii Judicial Foresight Survey Results . 72 D. SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT CLEMENT BEZOLD Shaping the Future and the Courts: Challenges From Science and Technology. .83 CHRISTOPHER JONES Earth 2020: Gaia Prudence . 89 M. KAY HARRIS The Social Construction of Crime and the Future of Crime and Punishment . .96 ROBERT BOHRER Future Fall-Out from the Genetic Revolution . .101 FRANCES WONG The Future of Family Court, Reproductive Technology, and Other Issues. .108 E. CULTURE, DEMOGRAPHICS AND APPROPRIATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION FORUMS SHARON RODGERS The Future of Cultural Forms of Dispute Resolution in the Formal Legal System . 113 WENDY SCHULTZ Culture in Transition: The Changing Ethnic Mix in Hawaii and the Nation . .120 BRENT BARNER Cultural Pluralism and the Future of the Judiciary . .138 - v - CHRIS JONES Exploring Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques in the Pacific Region . 157 PETER ADLER Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Future: Some Thoughts on Culture, Community and the Courts . .172 VITA TANIELU A Samoan Perspective of Dispute Resolution . .175 ILIMA PIIANAIA Demographics and the Future of Dispute Resolution. .178 KARL KIM Korean-American Perspectives on Alternative Dispute Resolution . .180 AMY AGBAYANI A Filipino Perspective of Dispute Resolution . .182 F. THE WORLD ECONOMY AND HAWAII'S ROLE IN THE PACIFIC JOHAN GALTUNG Geopolitical Transformations and the 21st World Economy . .185 GEORGE KANAHELE A Values-Based Approach to Hawaii's Tourism . .210 GREGORY PAI Hawaii's Long-Term Economic and Demographic Future: Implications for Hawaii's Judicial System . .213 BERT KOBAYASHI Future Judicial and Legal Reform . .217 G. COMMUNITY RESPONSE ERIC YAMAMOTO Core Values and the Future . .221 JOHN DAFFRON Lamp Oil, Visions, and the Search for the New World. .223 - vi - KEM LOWRY Politics, Planning, and the Future . 226 A.Q. McELRATH A Critical View of Justice and the Courts . 228 LAWRENCE OKINAGA Profound Effects and Anticipated Changes . 232 ARLENE LUM Culture, Technology and Law . .234 PATRICK YIM An Invitation to the Future . .238 IV. APPENDICES A. SCENARIOS AND STATEMENTS OF POSSIBLE AND PREFERRED FUTURES. .241 B. LIST OF SMALL GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS. .251 C. BIOGRAPHIC PROFILES: PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS. .267 D. LIST OF CONFERENCE FACILITATORS AND RECORDERS. 274 E. ABOUT THE EDITOR. 275 - vii - I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1991 JUDICIAL FORESIGHT CONGRESS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 1991 Judicial Foresight Congress was funded through an appropriation of the 15th Hawaii State Legislature and co-sponsored by the American Judicature Society with a special contribution from the State Justice Institute. It drew over 275 participants from Bench, Bar, and Community. The purpose of the Congress was to "anticipate the changing judicial needs of the public and the legal system by exploring Hawaii's social, political, and economic environment and its impact upon state courts, and responding to these forecasts through the creation of new visions and structures for the Hawaii Judiciary." The Congress grew out of the efforts of the Chief Justice to reach outside of the legal community for fresh ways of thinking
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pierce 1956 R.Pdf
    RULES ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII NOV 8 1955 WITH REGARD TO THE REPRODUCTION OF MASTERS THESES (a) No person or corporation may publish or reproduce in any manner,, without the consent of. the Committee on Research and-Graduate. Study, a thesis which has been submitted to the University in partial fulfillment of the require ments for an advanced degree, (b) No individual or corporation or other organization may publish quota tions or excerpts from a graduate thesis without the consent of the author and of the Committee on Research and Graduate Study. íx -c- ONïïvmrry o f haw , :s LIBRARY ACCULTURATION OF SAMO ARS IN THE ilfCP.MON VILLAGE CF LAIE, TERRITORI CF HAWAII A TUEÌEÌ SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE university cf Hawaii in partial fulfillment CF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE GF MASTER CF ARTS JUNE 1956 By <a^'f Bernard F» Pierce Hawn« CB5 n3 no.349 cop «2 m s m u m m a r s The fie ld work for this study was made possible by a grant from the Tri-Institutional Pacific Program. i l l TABUS OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT......................... .................................................................... H LIST CF TABLES................................................................................................ ▼ CHAPTER I* NATURE CF THE STUDY The Problem • •»•••••••••••»•.•••• 1 x The study of acculturation • •«•«••••••. 1 *. Acculturation of Samoans at Lai« • ••«•••»• 1 Areas of investigation • ••••••••••••• 5 Field Methods ............................................................. 5 Field observation • ••••••••«•••..«* 5 The schedule • •*••••••.••••••••• 6 Special informants ...a.*.*....*..« 9 * Study of President Jackson migration of 1952 9 Anonymity • 10 CHAPTER II. THE SETTING l THE VILLAGE OF LAIE Physical Environment .•••••••«•••••••• 11 * Social Environment 14 ! Historical background ••.»••«•••••**• 14 opulation* growth and eompoEition •••••••• 16 History of Samoan migration to Laie .................
    [Show full text]
  • Court Case Management Information Systems Manual
    National Center for State Courts COURT CASE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANUAL: with Model Data Elements, Reporting Forms, and Management Reports, by Mary Louise -Clifford and Lynn A. Jensen prepared by the State Judicial Information Systems Project and the National Court Statistics Project in cooperation with the Conference of State Court Administrators The material contained in this report was prepared by the National Center for State Courts' State Judicial Information Systems Project staff, with support from the staff of the National Court Statistics Project. These two projects were supported by Federal Grant No. 82-CJ-CX-KOOl, awarded to the National Center for State Courts, Williamsburg, Virginia, by the Systems Development Division, and Federal Grant No. 82-BJ-CX-K014, awarded by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, part of the U.S. Department of Justice, under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended. The State Judicial Information Systems Project has been directed by Lynn A. Jensen for the National Center for State Courts and monitored by Donald A. Manson for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The National Court Statistics Project has been directed by Victor E. Flango for the National Center and monitored by Carla Gaskins for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Clifford, Mary Louise. Court case management information systems manual. Bibliography: p. 1. Court adrninistration--United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Guide to the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Judicial Evaluation Fourth Edition: 2018-19 Term
    2019 Guide to the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Judicial Evaluation Fourth Edition: 2018-19 Term November 2019 2019 GUIDE TO THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT AND JUDICIAL EVALUATION Prepared By: Paige Scobee, Hamilton Consulting Group, LLC November 2019 The Wisconsin Civil Justice Council, Inc. (WCJC) was formed in 2009 to represent Wisconsin business inter- ests on civil litigation issues before the legislature and courts. WCJC’s mission is to promote fairness and equi- ty in Wisconsin’s civil justice system, with the ultimate goal of making Wisconsin a better place to work and live. The WCJC board is proud to present its fourth Guide to the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Judicial Evalua- tion. The purpose of this publication is to educate WCJC’s board members and the public about the role of the Supreme Court in Wisconsin’s business climate by providing a summary of the most important decisions is- sued by the Wisconsin Supreme Court affecting the Wisconsin business community. Board Members Bill G. Smith Jason Culotta Neal Kedzie National Federation of Independent Midwest Food Products Wisconsin Motor Carriers Business, Wisconsin Chapter Association Association Scott Manley William Sepic Matthew Hauser Wisconsin Manufacturers & Wisconsin Automobile & Truck Wisconsin Petroleum Marketers & Commerce Dealers Association Convenience Store Association Andrew Franken John Holevoet Kristine Hillmer Wisconsin Insurance Alliance Wisconsin Dairy Business Wisconsin Restaurant Association Association Brad Boycks Wisconsin Builders Association Brian Doudna Wisconsin Economic Development John Mielke Association Associated Builders & Contractors Eric Borgerding Gary Manke Wisconsin Hospital Association Midwest Equipment Dealers Association 10 East Doty Street · Suite 500 · Madison, WI 53703 www.wisciviljusticecouncil.org · 608-258-9506 WCJC 2019 Guide to the Wisconsin Supreme Court Page 2 and Judicial Evaluation Executive Summary The Wisconsin Supreme Court issues decisions that have a direct effect on Wisconsin businesses and individu- als.
    [Show full text]
  • A Statistical Profile of Samoans in the United States. Part I: Demography; Part II: Social and Economic Characteristics; Appendix: Language Use Among Samoans
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 264 331 UD 024 599 AUTHOR Hayes, Ge'ffrey; Levin, Michael J. TITLE A Statistical Profile of Samoans in the United States. Part I: Demography; Part II: Social and Economic Characteristics; Appendix: Language Use among Samoans. Evidence from the 1980 Census. INSTITUTION Northwest Regional Educational Lab., Portland, Oreg. SPONS AGENCY Employment and Training Administration (DOL), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Dec 83 CONTRACT 99-3-r946-75-075-01 NOTE 117p.; A paper commissioned for a Study of Toverty, Unemployment and Training Needs of American Samoans. For related documents, see UD 024 599-603. PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Birth Rate; Census Figures; *Demography; *Educational Attainment; *Employment Level; Family Characteristics; Income; *Language Proficiency; Migr.tion Patterns; Population Growth; Poverty; *Samoan Americans; *Socioeconomic Status IDENTIFIERS California; Census 1980; Hawaii; *Samoans; Washington ABSTRACT This paper provides a broad overview of the demographic, social, and economic characteristics of Samoans in the United States, focusing particularly on the Samoan populations of Hawaii, California, and Washington, where 85% of Samoans reside. The data is derived from the "race" question on the 1980 Census and other local statistical materials. Demographically, the population is found to be highly urbanized, young (average age 19.5 years) and with a high fertility rate (averaging 4.3 children per adult woman). The total U.S. Samoan population projected for the year 2000 is most realistically estimated at 131,000. Among the three States, Hawaii's Samoans are youngest, with a higher dependency ratio and lower sex ratio than elsewhere in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameras in the Courtroom: Guidelines for State Criminal Trials
    Michigan Law Review Volume 84 Issue 3 1985 Cameras in the Courtroom: Guidelines for State Criminal Trials Nancy T. Gardner University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Communications Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Nancy T. Gardner, Cameras in the Courtroom: Guidelines for State Criminal Trials, 84 MICH. L. REV. 475 (1985). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol84/iss3/9 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cameras in the Courtroom: Guidelines for State Criminal Trials In 1965, only two states permitted photographic and electronic media coverage1 of courtroom proceedings.2 Today, forty-three states permit television coverage of their appellate and/or trial proceedings on an experimental or permanent basis. 3 This development has not come about in a systematic or uniform fashion. Lacking guidance from the federal courts, the states have independently conducted ex­ periments and adopted their own guidelines in an attempt to accom­ modate the conflicting constitutional4 and policy interests5 involved. The development of state guidelines6 has stemmed largely from the belief that media self-discipline is insufficient to ensure fair treatment 1. The phrase "photographic and electronic media coverage," referred to herein as "televis­ ing" or "broadcasting," includes both the acquisition of information (through devices such as still news photography, audio taping, motion picture filming and videotaping), and the public dissemination and broadcast of that information.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian & Pacific Islanders Handbook
    20424_KAISER_iccc_covers.qxd 8/15/03 4:37 PM Page 4 A Provider’s Handbook on CulturallyCulturally CompetentCompetent CareCare Asian and Pacific Islander Population 2nd Edition Kaiser Permanente National Diversity Council and the Kaiser Permanente National Diversity Department 20859_KAISER_ccc_api_guts.qxd 8/13/03 10:58 AM Page 1 A PROVIDER’S HANDBOOK ON CULTURALLY COMPETENT CARE ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER POPULATION 2ND EDITION Kaiser Permanente National Diversity Council And the Kaiser Permanente National Diversity Department 20859_KAISER_ccc_api_guts.qxd 8/13/03 10:58 AM Page 2 Asian and Pacific Islander Handbook Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................1 DEMOGRAPHICS ......................................................................................................2 Introduction .........................................................................................................2 Language..............................................................................................................4 Racism..................................................................................................................4 Families................................................................................................................4 Education, Income and Occupation Patterns....................................................5 Education.......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Judges Decide School Finance Cases?
    HOW DO JUDGES DETERMINE EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS? Ethan Hutt,* Daniel Klasik,† & Aaron Tang‡ ABSTRACT There is an old riddle that asks, what do constitutional school funding lawsuits and birds have in common? The answer: every state has its own. Yet while almost every state has experienced hotly-contested school funding litigation, the results of these suits have been nearly impossible to predict. Scholars and advocates have struggled for decades to explain why some state courts rule for plaintiff school children—often resulting in billions of dollars in additional school spending—while others do not. If there is rough agreement on anything, it is that “the law” is not the answer: variation in the strength of state constitutional education clauses is uncorrelated with the odds of plaintiff success. Just what factors do explain different outcomes, though, is anybody’s guess. One researcher captured the academy’s state of frustration aptly when she suggested that whether a state’s school funding system will be invalidated “depends almost solely on the whimsy of the state supreme court justices themselves.” In this Article, we analyze an original data set of 313 state-level school funding decisions using multiple regression models. Our findings confirm that the relative strength of a state’s constitutional text regarding education has no bearing on school funding lawsuit outcomes. But we also reject the judicial whimsy hypothesis. Several variables— including the health of the national economy (as measured by GDP growth), Republican control over the state legislature, and an appointment-based mechanism of judicial selection—are significantly and positively correlated with the odds of a school funding system being declared unconstitutional.
    [Show full text]
  • Famous Cases of the Wisconsin Supreme Court
    In Re: Booth 3 Wis. 1 (1854) What has become known as the Booth case is actually a series of decisions from the Wisconsin Supreme Court beginning in 1854 and one from the U.S. Supreme Court, Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. 514 (1859), leading to a final published decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in Ableman v. Booth, 11 Wis. 501 (1859). These decisions reflect Wisconsin’s attempted nullification of the federal fugitive slave law, the expansion of the state’s rights movement and Wisconsin’s defiance of federal judicial authority. The Wisconsin Supreme Court in Booth unanimously declared the Fugitive Slave Act (which required northern states to return runaway slaves to their masters) unconstitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court overturned that decision but the Wisconsin Supreme Court refused to file the U.S. Court’s mandate upholding the fugitive slave law. That mandate has never been filed. When the U.S. Constitution was drafted, slavery existed in this country. Article IV, Section 2 provided as follows: No person held to service or labor in one state under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due. Based on this provision, Congress in 1793 passed a law that permitted the owner of any runaway slave to arrest him, take him before a judge of either the federal or state courts and prove by oral testimony or by affidavit that the person arrested owed service to the claimant under the laws of the state from which he had escaped; if the judge found the evidence to be sufficient, the slave owner could bring the fugitive back to the state from which he had escaped.
    [Show full text]
  • Trial Court Consolidation in Hawaii: the Road Already Taken?
    Trial Court Consolidation in Hawaii: The Road Already Taken? Susan Ekimoto Jaworowski Researcher Report No. 4. 1991 Legislative Reference Bureau State Capitol Honoiulu, Hawaii 96813 FOREWORD This study was prepared in response to House Resolution No. 68, adopted during the Regular Session of 1991. The Resolution requested an examination of the feasibility of consolidating Hawaii's two tier trial court system into one tier. The Resolution also requested information concerning the history and rationale behind establishing the two tier system, an evaluation of the currert trial court system and judicial administration, the rationale behind the differing job requirements and qualifications for judges in the two tiers, and the feasibility of establishing the same requirements for all trial level judges. The assistance of Bureau researcher Charlotte Carter-Yamauchi was a significant factor in the timely completion of this study. Ms. Carter-Yamauchi interviewed many of the circuit court judges and provided invaluable input into several areas, including the structure of the district court questionnaire. The Bureau extends its appreciation to ail who cooperated with and participated in this study, particularly Chief Justice Herman Lum; Dr. Irwin Tanaka, Administrative Director of the Courts; and C. Michael Hare, Chairman of the Judicial Selection Commission. It is hoped that the issues raised by the study will assist the Legislature and the Judiciary in making further incruiries and decisions on this matter. Samuel €3. K. Chang Director November 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 1. INTRODUCTION .... ........................................... 1 Nature and Scope of Study ............................................................................. 1 Endnotes ....................................................................................................... 2 2. HISTORY OF THE TRIAL COURT SYSTEM IN HAWAII ........................................... 3 Pre-1840 Judicial System ...............
    [Show full text]
  • International 300 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of "sectioning" the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again-beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Alums Jack Auhk ('581 Was Elected to the Bench Atlanta Firm of Hurt, Richardson, Garner, in Branch 4 of the Dane County, Wis., Todd & Cadenhead
    15 Notes on Alums Jack AuHk ('581 was elected to the bench Atlanta firm of Hurt, Richardson, Garner, in Branch 4 of the Dane County, Wis., Todd & Cadenhead. Mr. Thrcott recently Circuit Court in April, and assumed his completed a tour of duty with the US new position in August. Aulik has prac- Marine Corps. ticed law and lived in Sun Prairie Paul ], Fisher ('60) has been since 1959. appointed General Counsel for Ariston Steven W. Weinke ('661was recently Capital Management and California elected Circuit Court Judge for Fond du Divisional Manager. Lac County, Wis. Weinke succeeds US District Judge John Reynolds Eugene F. McEssey ('491, who served the ('491, a member of the Law School's county for 24 years. Board of Visitors, has announced that he Pat Richter ('71) has been named will take senior status in the Eastern Dis- director of personnel for Oscar Mayer trict of Wisconsin. Judge Reynolds had Foods Corp., Madison. Richter was per- also served as Wisconsin Attorney sonnel manager for the beverages divi- General and Governor. sion of General Foods, White Plains, N.Y. David W. Wood ('81) has joined the Alan R. Post ('72) has become an Columbus, Ohio firm of Vorys, Sater, associate with the firm Sorling, Northrup, Seymour and Pease. Hanna, Cullen and Cochran, Ltd., Spring- Scott Jennings ('75) has been named field, Ill. Post had been with Illinois Bell, an Associate Editor of the Lawyers Coop- Chicago. erative Publishing Co., Rochester, NY. James H. Haberstroh ('751 became a For the past seven years, Mr. Jennings vice president of First Wisconsin Trust was with the US Department of Energy Co., Milwaukee.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2010 a Crossroads for Discussion of Public Policy—This Is an Important Emerging Initiative of Marquette University Law School
    M a r q u e t t e u niversity Law s c h o o L Magazine Fa L L 2 0 1 0 eckstein hall opens Dean Kearney welcomes archbishop Dolan A ls o I n si d e : daniel d. Blinka on the changing role of trials and witnesses of new york, chief Justice abrahamson, and Matthew J. Mitten on taxing college football Justice scalia to Dedication Biskupic, Brennan, dressler, Meine, Sykes Faculty blog: Paul Robeson, Lady Gaga, and the breakdown $85 Million Project Sets Stage for Law School’s Future of social order n A e d t h e Laying the Foundation M o R F It is not unusual for me to invite you to read the Marquette University campus, where Lincoln latest issue of Marquette Lawyer. I am more self- stressed the importance of reading: “A capacity, conscious of it now because reading is much on and taste, for reading, gives access to whatever my mind. has already been discovered by others. It is the First, we have dedicated Ray and Kay Eckstein key, or one of the keys, to the already solved Hall—a building for whose exterior we set the problems. And not only so. It gives a relish, goal of being noble, bold, harmonious, dramatic, and facility, for successfully pursuing the yet confident, slightly willful, and, in a word, unsolved ones.” This speech helped inspire great; whose interior we wanted to be open our Legacies of Lincoln Conference, held last to the community and conducive to a sense of October to commemorate the sesquicentennial community; and that we intended would be, in of Lincoln’s Milwaukee speech and the Ithe aggregate, the best law school building in the bicentennial of his birth; papers from the country.
    [Show full text]