DOCSLIB.ORG

Where Did the Fatal Head Shot Come from ?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WHERE DID THE FATAL HEAD SHOT COME FROM ? According to numerous doctors and nurses at Parkland Hospital and The alleged exit wound and violent backward motion of the President's almost every JFX assassination researcher, the fatal head shot was tired head are more consistent with a shot being fired from the storm drain from the front and to the right of the presaienl. location than that of a possible sniper location near the east corner of the If this is true, then the most perfect angle could have been from stockade fence. According to Dr. Charles Chrenshaw, there was what the storm drain located at the west and of the wooden stockade fence appeared to be a large exit wound on the right rear of the President's head. on the famous grassy knoll. II the fatal shot was fired from the easternmost area of the fence, would We watched CNN-TV, and researcher Jack Brazil. send a research It not make sense that the left side should be missing and not the right? team member Into the storm sewer system in Dealey Plaza. Many It the Senate House Select Committee an Assassinations is correct with people were unaware of this little known theory. Since then, many their conclusion that there Is a 95% probability of a fourth shot being hours of research at the grassy knoll have been spent studying the fired from behind the stockade fence on the grassy knoll, this could very various angles of possible snipers. A rapidly growing conclusion is the well have been the location. storm drain at the end of the stockade fences a possible angle for the reported damage to the Presidents head. The storm drain could have provided an underground escape route leading Also note that the bridge railing and fence Is at a 45 degree angle from to the center of Main St. and then to Industrial Blvd. the railroad overpass, making it a blind spot from any observers that Many observers watched Jack Brazil and his team of dedicated would be on the bridge overlooking Elm St. researchers send a man into the storm sewer system on Elm St. After On Nov.22.1963, the wind was blowing due east at 13 mph. As the entering the system, the same may walked out of a nine foot storm sewer motorcade traveled west on Elm Street, Senator Ralph Yarborough, who pipe that emptied into a drainage ditch of the Trinity River at Industrial was in the second car behind President Kennedy. later stated, Blvd. it took fifty four minutes to go from Elm St. to the exit point. even • I smelled gunpowder.' If the fatal head shot was fired from the storm with debris, blockage and a slight drizzle of rain. drain at the end of the stockade fence; then it would have been quite The work of Jack Brazil and his research learn is being noted by not only possible to have encountered the smell of gunpowder horn an open car but by several famous authors of best selling books on the JFK driven through this area. assassination. A few of these authors have been seen checking out the Moments after the assassination, a motorcycle policeman was storm drain at the west end of the stockade fence recently. This angle and photographed standing On the concrete railing of the railroad overpass. position is being brought into more comprehensive study and research Just a few feet from his location was the storm drain from where the thanks to Mr. Jack Brazil. fatal head shot could have been fired. Many people ran to this location For more information contact Ray Evans P.O. Box 461, Tyler Texas after the shooting why? One of the first police radio responses was to 75710 PH-(903) 566-2356 get someone up on the triple underpass and to check out the ralyards. THE STORM ORRIN JACK BRAZIL'S RESEARCH TEAM ENTERS THE STORM RESEARCH TEAM MEMBER MAKES EXIT SEWER SYSTEM ON EIM ST. OVER 2400 I LATER A DIRECT VIEW RECENT PHOTOS TAKEN FROM FREEWAY OVERPASS Ed Hoffman is a man that claims to have seen a men behind the stadia& According to Mr. Hoffman, ha was parked on the 1-35 Freeway overpass fence hand a rata to another man just after the assassination. The rifle, west of the grassy knoll and had a direct view of the activities behind the according to Mr. Hoffman, was quickly disassembled and put into a too/box. fence. The view is now blocked by a largebiliboard that was at a much The second man, dressed in a railroad worker's uniform, then walked away lower elevation on Nov.22,1963. from the scene toward the train tracks_ Mr Hoffman claims this event Last week the billboard was removed tor a law days during a sign change took place at the west end of the wooden slot:Acadia lance. where the and provided a perfect opportunity to take a few photos from the overpass railroad bridge over Elm St. meets the stockade fence. He also states that where Mr. Hoffman tells to he was located. the rifle was taken apart bahind a large railroad switching box, located So that we all could better understand his vantage point, without approximately 20 ft. tram the storm drain, Could there be a possible the billboard In tria way, we decided to Show you the photographs conneetion of the two areas? If so; could this be where the fatal head tavern Iasi week. It appears that Mr, Hoffman could have a good view of the shot was fired From? area behind the grassy knoll. What do you think? "THE MOTORCADE IN DOWNTOWN DALLAS" This beautiful photograph is available in full color 8"xl 0". A limited edition of the highest quality now at J.F.K.-A.I.C. Dallas, Texas ya.4! CF-4.4-412 S'25' hte...-,44 21.542. Ar5. • 30j /71, 4■rsi° V-071°-.2 -44:/ . c7e-e'" ei 6r:-■.f<' Wear/ ■-s- • //X, s - • 1‘4,0-r■C e e • 1-44-rul ,Xx ,Cef.. //, , r 7 se e9 -mcr..e.ow zt • 5 . c9 .7.4) .2ter 4.19. 22. 4(0 S R EF .419 0-2 0- - CC •S . -454) •-•0-.,,eg C77 c.,-11-4---4 -46 ^4-c4-"-m,"?. • ..■-•/.7-2 t4l-o.‘41 Z;re Sml47 ,C/C.,e-2•^1L4.1.4 /f/2/ 2, 724-~ , S LETTER from Lee Oswald to Gov. John Connally about the dishonorable discharge, which Oswald had recieved. ASA6.6.91641140 88.51141901 •Ler-nrs W(1111/220 LE ELM ST OM Ivh (2CP.,411081101680 11 1 AL A Of (.00 APIA QCESTIONSANNVITRF.I) '0 2900 160 INT A( 20 0A8LANO 7 ALSO SEA tIve1A0 • ALSO SEE LAMCASTEA KENNEDY 206E 2 70- 2)99 12 )14 1C.6f 6 COMMAND "I:1:714ttiZ.4"& 60001STAASTA PyR CO 6210570 7 F COOPER -R170576 PO V CAMPBELL -6176511 POST '1 9 67E860 SCOL 08 11151 6173521 Sennady Command Post C CA30. RI70521 SCO7T FEHEAPIAMSCO RI74340 Pedro O Paul 0. PAM. D. PEDRO 7J04 L ACADIA 11176)60 18511Chatavverth (611)46100767 PL00101<aMAAAAA Pug 41114)73 Rasartila, Mt./55113 AMCOR...ILL 808 CO-4124602 654040 7014 019 101211102 6486R 1004 C O -RII0911 Historical AMCGRAy6AILL 100 CO-417706 5018060 800 CO 1AC -6112169 •ED010 6157416 INC -61112341 RESEARCHERS NOTE EADAP7A/ILI1 INC -6142064 Kennedy Assassination 610 20012 INC 0112169 emaRI1Y4 BELT 600 4121061 .04T, PAECOMAN straoss Abraham Zapruder's all ice was located .DALLAS URAMUMLOIL 4111063 .000680 6ARAY INC A1216)4 in 501 Elm St. Bldg.- II was Jennifer Jr. 6MILLIR CuPAIOL1 In 81718)1 BUS TOUR •S7641.11.4 OP DALLAS Amyl, Inc. This is where he took his camera 8MCILELLE 5461008 INC 61/1097 6E00100 0A6440141 0112011 Kennedy Assassination Tours atter he filmed the assassination. His 'RALPH 0 LEEDS .61 92671 800410L1(LEE0E LT066112631 2141369.9406 A.M. business is listed PJFAMIPER JR INC 1146071 21.4/S71-2770 P.M. $008JEAR1E Af0 CO 81 93611 60166011E LAPPET co 11127766 Group Rates are Available .peastsco PIC 1127267 .
Recommended publications
  • High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing

    High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing

    High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing Project #: RES2016-05 Final Report Submitted to Tennessee Department of Transportation Principal Investigator (PI) Deo Chimba, PhD., P.E., PTOE. Tennessee State University Phone: 615-963-5430 Email: [email protected] Co-Principal Investigator (Co-PI) Janey Camp, PhD., P.E., GISP, CFM Vanderbilt University Phone: 615-322-6013 Email: [email protected] July 10, 2018 DISCLAIMER This research was funded through the State Research and Planning (SPR) Program by the Tennessee Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration under RES2016-05: High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Tennessee Department of Transportation and the United States Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The State of Tennessee and the United States Government assume no liability of its contents or use thereof. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s), who are solely responsible for the facts and accuracy of the material presented. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Tennessee Department of Transportation or the United States Department of Transportation. ii Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. RES2016-05 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date: March 2018 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Deo Chimba and Janey Camp TDOT PROJECT # RES2016-05 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering; Tennessee State University 11.
  • Existing Mainline & Streetscape

    Existing Mainline & Streetscape

    EXISTING MAINLINE & STREETSCAPE Features Village of Hillside Village of Westchester Village of Bellwood Village of Broadview Village of Maywood Village of Forest Park Village of Oak Park City of Chicago www.eisenhowerexpressway.com HILLSIDE I-290 MAINLINE I-290 Looking West North Wolf Road I-290 East of Mannheim Road - Retaining Walls Underpass at I-290 - Noise Wall I-290 I-290 Looking West IHB R.R, Crossing I-290 Westbound approaching I-88 Interchange EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES I-290 Looking West I-290 East side of Mannheim Road Interchange 2 www.eisenhowerexpressway.com CROSS ROADS OTHER FEATURES HILLSIDE Mannheim Road Mannheim Road Bridge, sidewalk and fence over I-290 Hillside Welcome Signage Mannheim Road Mannheim Road Bridge, sidewalk and fence over I-290 Hillside Marker at I-290 Mannheim Road Northbound - Hillside Markers at I-290 EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES 3 www.eisenhowerexpressway.com WESTCHESTER I-290 MAINLINE I-290 EB CD Road I-290 EB CD Road Entrance I-290 Looking East - Westchester Boulevard Overpass Noise walls along Wedgewood Drive EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES 4 www.eisenhowerexpressway.com CROSSROADS/FRONTAGE ROADS WESTCHESTER Bellwood Avenue Westchester Boulevard Bridge, sidewalk, wall and fencing over I-290 Looking North towards I-290 overpass Westchester Boulevard Mannheim Road Looking South Looking Southeast EXISTING MAINLINE AND STREETSCAPE FEATURES
  • Recommended Ramp Design Procedures for Facilities Without Frontage Roads

    Recommended Ramp Design Procedures for Facilities Without Frontage Roads

    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4538-3 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date RECOMMENDED RAMP DESIGN PROCEDURES FOR September 2004 FACILITIES WITHOUT FRONTAGE ROADS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. J. Bonneson, K. Zimmerman, C. Messer, and M. Wooldridge Report 0-4538-3 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project No. 0-4538 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report: Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2002 - August 2004 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Ramp Design Considerations for Facilities without Frontage Roads 16. Abstract Based on a recent change in Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) policy, frontage roads are not to be included along controlled-access highways unless a study indicates that the frontage road improves safety, improves operations, lowers overall facility costs, or provides essential access. Interchange design options that do not include frontage roads are to be considered for all new freeway construction. Ramps in non- frontage-road settings can be more challenging to design than those in frontage-road settings for several reasons. Adequate ramp length, appropriate horizontal and vertical curvature, and flaring to increase storage area at the crossroad intersection should all be used to design safe and efficient ramps for non-frontage-road settings.
  • Storm Drain Marking

    Storm Drain Marking

    Storm Drain Marking Part of the City of Ashland Curb to Creek Campaign A STEP -BY-STEP GUIDE FOR NEIGHBORHOOD VOLUNTEER LEADERS Ashland Parks & Recreation North Mountain Park Nature Center 620 North Mountain Avenue Ashland, OR 97520 Phone: (541) 488-6606 Fax: (541) 488-6607 Email: [email protected] 1 Table of Contents What is Storm Drain Marking …………………………………………….……. Page 3 The First Steps for Neighborhood Leaders ……………………................. Page 3 Neighborhood Registration Form .......................………………............. Page 4 Getting Ready to Mark …...................…………………………….……....... Page 5 List of Materials in Marking Kits ……………………………….…………….Page 6 How to Mark the Storm Drain ..…......…....………………………………Pages 6-9 Safety First Locate and Prepare Stomp the Pad Record Activity Telling Neighbors about Curb to Creek …………………………….…….. Page 10 The Final Steps ..………...........................................………………….…Page 11 Project Report Form …………………………….………………………......... Page 12 Adult Volunteer Consent Form……………….………………………......... Page 13 Youth Volunteer Consent Form..…………….………………………......... Page 14 2 WHAT IS STORM DRAIN MARKING ? Storm drain marking is an educational program designed to inform citizens about the hazards of dumping pollutants into storm drains. The placards remind people that storm drains flow untreated, directly into local streams and creeks. Ashland’s storm drains are NOT connected to the sewage treatment plant. By placing storm drain markers, you can take an active roll in preventing pollution in your neighborhood. Volunteers may also distribute door hangers, informing citizens about the proper disposal of chemicals that could harm wildlife and pollute waterways. Storm drain marking helps build community and mobilize grass roots environmental protection. Marking also helps educate your neighbors about the importance of watershed protection. If you are interested, you can become a neighborhood leader for your own Storm Drain Stomp event.
  • Allen County Storm Drain Marking Guide022510

    Allen County Storm Drain Marking Guide022510

    The Allen County Surveyor’s Office has established a storm drain marking program to involve and educate the community of the harms of dumping pollutants down the storm drains. The following guidelines are provided to assist individuals, groups or organizations in planning, implementing, and preparing a successful storm drain marking event and to provide information on what citizens can do to prevent or reduce pollution that enters our waterways through storm drains. What is a Storm Drain? A storm drain is a network of underground pipes designed to control flooding by transporting stormwater from urban areas to a waterbody. The storm drain marking program involves marking storm drain inlets. The following are typical examples of storm inlets. What is Storm Drain Marking? Storm drain marking is labeling a storm drain inlet with a pre-printed marker, tile, sticker, or stencil that reads “ Dump No Waste - Drains to River ”, "Drains to Stream ”, or a similar written message that specifies the waterbody to which the storm drain inlet drains. Allen County has chosen a vinyl marker that comes in circular or rectangular form that is applied to the inlet with an adhesive or tie straps depending on the type of inlet being marked. Why Should We Mark Storm Drains? • Storm drain marking informs others about the street-to-river connection. Allen County 1 Storm Drain Marking Guide Surveyor’s Office • Many people may not realize that water flowing into storm drains or any material that is dumped or washes into the storm drains is not treated before it empties into a river, stream, or pond.
  • High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Evaluation Ii

    High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Evaluation Ii

    HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANES EVALUATION II Traffic Impact, Safety Assessment, and Public Acceptance Dr. Peter T. Martin, Associate Professor University of Utah Dhruvajyoti Lahon, Aleksandar Stevanovic, Research Assistants University of Ut ah Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Utah Traffic Lab 122 South Central Campus Drive Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 November 2004 Acknowledgements The authors thank the Utah Department of Transportation employees for the data they furnished and their assistance with this study. The authors particularly thank the Technical Advisory Committee members for their invaluable input throughout the study. The authors are also thankful to the respondents who took the time to participate in the public opinion survey. The valuable contribution of those who helped collect data and conduct public opinion surveys is greatly appreciated. Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 1.1 Background................................................................................................................1
  • Green Infrastructure Design for Transport Projects: a Road Map To

    Green Infrastructure Design for Transport Projects: a Road Map To

    GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN FOR TRANSPORT PROJECTS A ROAD MAP TO PROTECTING ASIA’S WILDLIFE BIODIVERSITY DECEMBER 2019 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN FOR TRANSPORT PROJECTS A ROAD MAP TO PROTECTING ASIA’S WILDLIFE BIODIVERSITY DECEMBER 2019 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2019 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 8632 4444; Fax +63 2 8636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2019. ISBN 978-92-9261-991-6 (print), 978-92-9261-992-3 (electronic) Publication Stock No. TCS189222 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/TCS189222 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/.
  • Road Design and Construction Terms

    Road Design and Construction Terms

    Glossary of Road Design and Construction Terms Nebraska ◆Department ◆of ◆Roads 3-C Planning The continuing, cooperative, comprehensive planning process in an urbanized area as required by federal law. (e.g. Lincoln, Omaha, or Sioux City Area Planning) 3R Project 3R stands for resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation. These projects are designed to extend the life of an existing highway surface and to enhance highway safety. These projects usually overlay the existing surface and replace guardrails. 3R projects are generally constructed within the existing highway right-of-way. Abutment An abutment is made from concrete on piling and supports the end of a bridge deck. Access Control The extent to which the state, by law, regulates where vehicles may enter or leave the highway. Action Plan A set of general guidelines and procedures developed by each state to assure that adequate consideration is given to possible social, economic and environmental effects of proposed highway projects. All states were directed to develop this plan by the Federal Highway Administration. Adapted Grasses Grasses which are native to the area in which they are planted, but have adjusted to the conditions of the environment. Adverse Environmental Effects Those conditions which cause temporary or permanent damage to the environment. Aesthetics In the highway context, the considerations of landscaping, land use and structures to insure that the proposed highway is pleasing to the eye of the viewer from the roadway and to the viewer looking at the roadway. Aggregate Stone and gravel of various sizes which compose the major portion of the surfacing material. The sand or pebbles added to cement in making concrete.
  • North/South Kuna Corridor (Railroad Crossing in the City of Kuna)

    North/South Kuna Corridor (Railroad Crossing in the City of Kuna)

    North/South Kuna Corridor Railroad crossing in the City of Kuna on Swan Falls Road Priority 20 Background A Union Pacific Railroad line runs through Kuna just south of downtown and parallel to Indian Creek. An average of 20 trains travels this route each day, according to Kuna Crossing: Feasibility and Implementation Plan;1 the total number can be as high as 39 trains a day. Train speeds range between 40 mph and 70 mph, and average train length is 88 cars. Trains have as many as 150 cars, up to two miles in total length, depending on the size of individual cars. Delays of up to 3½ minutes are observed at rail crossings in Kuna when trains travel through. The average time that crossing gates are down at the railroad crossings is 2½ minutes. The City of Kuna has requested a railroad overpass to alleviate emergency response delays, traffic delays, and north-south connectivity issues. Ada County Highway District (ACHD) completed the Kuna Crossing study to determine the most feasible alternative, and Swan Falls Road was selected as the preferred location.2 The Corridor at a Glance • Swan Falls Road/Linder Road corridor mostly rural and suburban: o Farms and a few large-lot subdivisions adjacent to road from I-84 south to Hubbard Road o Subdivisions, schools, and businesses along road from Hubbard to downtown Kuna and a short distance south of Indian Creek and the railroad o Farms and open brush from King Road south to Snake River/Swan Falls Dam • Road is two lanes wide, owned and maintained by ACHD o Combined with Linder Road, it is the longest north-south route in the Treasure Valley .
  • Chapter 4. Road and Structure Design

    Chapter 4. Road and Structure Design

    Preparatory Survey for Metropolitan Arterial Road Improvement Project Final Report CHAPTER 4. ROAD AND STRUCTURE DESIGN 4.1 Road and Intersection Design 4.1.1 Design Criteria (1) Applicable Design Standards “Standard Specifications for geometric design of urban roads” published by the Directorate General of Highways of the Ministry of Public Works (MPW) in March 1992 is used as the main design standards for the road design. (2) Road Classification Roads in urban areas shall be classified into two types according to the kind of access control as follows. All roads in this project are defined as Type II. Type I : full access control Type II: partial access control or no access control Type II roads are classified into 4 classes according to their functional classification and design traffic volume. The design classes of Type II are shown in Table 4.1.1. Table 4.1.1 Design Classes of Type II Function Design traffic volume (PCU/day) Class Primary Arterial I Collector 10,000 or more I Less than 10,000 II Secondary Arterial 20,000 or more I Less than 20,000 II Collector 6,000 or more II Less than 6,000 III Local 500 or more III Less than 500 IV Source: Standard specifications for geometric design of urban roads, DGH Class I :The highest standard streets of 4 or more lanes to serve inter-city or intra-city, high speed, through traffic with partial access control Class II :High standard streets of 2 or more lanes to serve inter-city or intra-city, high speed, through traffic with/without partial access control Class III :Intermediate standard streets of 2 or more lanes to serve inter-district, moderate speed, through or access traffic without access control Class IV :Low standard streets of 1 travel way to serve access to the road side land lots (3) Design Speed The design speed of Type II shall be the value according to the class as follows.
  • Drainage Design Manual

    Drainage Design Manual

    THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO Transportation & Storm Water Design Manuals Drainage Design Manual January 2017 Edition The City of San Diego | Drainage Design Manual | January 2017 Edition DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR DOUBLE-SIDED PRINTING The City of San Diego | Drainage Design Manual | January 2017 Edition CONTENT Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................................................... i Figures ............................................................................................................................................................... vii Tables .................................................................................................................................................................. ix Equations ............................................................................................................................................................. x 1. Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Policies ............................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Basic Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 1-2 Exceptions to Design Standards .............................................................................................
  • City Wide Drainage Assessment Report

    City Wide Drainage Assessment Report

    City of Summit City Wide Drainage Assessment Report Dept. of Community Services Division of Engineering Revised - July 2020 Aaron Schrager, City Engineer Rick Matias, Assistant City Engineer Lori Toth, Assistant Engineer Page 1 of 37 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 SUMMARY 5 CATEGORY I – DRAINAGE LOCATIONS 1. Golf Course Pond (Permitting Phase) 7 2. Salt Brook 8 3. West End Avenue Erosion 9 4. Railroad Culverts 10 5. Middle Avenue Culvert 11 6. Beekman Road Culvert 12 CATEGORY II – DRAINAGE LOCATIONS 7. Briant Parkway, Easements near Springfield Avenue intersection 14 8. Portland Road – At Dorchester Road 15 9. Tulip Street – Oakland Place to Linden Place 16 10. Kenneth Court and Crest Acre Court 17 11. Morris Avenue at Elm Street Condo Driveway 18 12. Martins Brook 19 CATEGORY III – DRAINAGE LOCATIONS 13. Huntley Road (Under Construction) 21 14. Gloucester Road (Design Complete – Awaiting Construction) 22 15. Wade Drive 23 16. Sweet Briar Road / Plymouth Road (Under Construction - Phased) 24 17. Dorset Lane Icing 25 18. Club Drive 26 19. Ox Bow Lane 27 20. Princeton Street 28 21. Division Avenue Bridge (Part of #2) 29 22. Beverly Road & Sheridan Road 30 Page 2 of 37 COMPLETED PROJECTS (Pages 31-37) 1. 236 Springfield Avenue “The Dell” (Designed Completed-work not to be completed) 2. Whittredge Road/Dogwood Drive (Completed Fall 2007) 3. New Providence Avenue (Completed 2007) 4. Sheffield Road (Completed Fall 2008) 5. Memorial Field Basketball Courts (Completed 2008) 6. 8 & 12 Sweet Briar Road (Completed – Fall 2009) 7. Springfield Avenue and Summit Avenue (Completed – Fall 2009) 8. Laurel Avenue (Completed – Fall 2009) 9.