DOCSLIB.ORG

F-6-44 Camp Greentop Historic District (Camp 2)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
F-6-44 Camp Greentop Historic District (Camp 2) F-6-44 Camp Greentop Historic District (Camp 2) Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 09-13-2019 Memo to file July 22, 2019 From: Natalie Loukianoff Preservation Officer, OPS Re: F-6-147, Catoctin Mountain park, F-6-43, Camp Misty Mount Historic District, & F-6-44, Camp Greentop Historic District The National Capital Region of the National Park Service has supplied the Maryland Historical Trust with a hard copy and a digital copy of the Cabin Camps Greentop and Misty Mount Historic Structures Report. The report was produced by the National Capital Region for Catoctin Mountain Park. The hard copy and digital copy have been included the Trust Library for ® reference. ® Memo to file January 10, 2019 From: Natalie Loukianoff Preservation Officer, OPS Re: F-6-44, Camp Greentop & F-6-147, Catoctin Mountain Park The Catoctin Mountain Park has supplied the Maryland Historic Trust with digital copies of the Historic American Buildings Survey produced by the National Park Service HABS for Camp Greentop. This included written histories, drawings, and photographs on Camp Greentop (MD-61 I) and a selection of various structures within the camp. The digital records have been printed and included in the Trust Library for reference. HABS Package Includes: Camp Greentop (MD-611): Written history, drawing, photographs, photograrnmetry Building 56, Office (MD-611-A): Written history, drawings, photographs Building 57, Infirmary (MD-611-B): Written history, drawings, photographs Building 69, Ten Bunk Cabin (MD-611-C): Written history, drawings, photographs Dining Hall and Recreation Hall (MD-611-D): Photographs Craft Shop (MD-611-E): Photograph Four Bunk Cabin (MD-611-F): Photograph Two Bunk Cabin (MD-562-G): Photographs Comfort Station B (MD-562-H): Photograph Memo to file November 16, 2018 From: Mary Kate Mansius Inventory Registrar Re: Camp Misty Mount Historic District (F-6-43) and Camp Greentop Historic District (F-6-44) The following letter was sent from Mark Schara (HABS Architect) to Elizabeth Hughes, dated November 2, 2018: The Historic American Buildings Survey is pleased to announce the completion of a project to document Camp Misty Mount and Camp Greentop at Catoctin Mountain Park near Thurmont (Frederick County). The camps were built as part of the Recreational Demonstration Areas program, one of President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal programs intended to provide both work relief employment, and recreational opportunities in new parks near urban areas. Acquisition of land in the Catoctin Mountains west of Thurmont by the National Park Service (NPS) was begun in 1935, with Catoctin Recreational Demonstration Area officially designated in November 1936. The park was redesignated Catoctin Mountain Park in 1954. Construction of the camps, each consisting of approximately 30 buildings, was completed in 1937. The buildings were designed by NPS architects A.R. Vanston and engineer J.W. Schnebly, in the rustic style promoted in Albert H. Good’s Park Structures and Landscapes (1935). Making use of locally-available materials, Works Progress Administration workers built the camp buildings using a combination of horizontal log construction, and wood frame construction with exterior waney board siding, resting on fieldstone foundation piers. Nine individual buildings were selected for documentation. Camp Greentop was documented with eight sheets of measured drawings, 23 large format photographs, and 31 historical report pages. Camp Misty Mount was documented with 14 sheets of measured drawings, 33 large format photographs, and 43 historical report pages. The project was sponsored by the National Capital Region of the National Park Service, and by Catoctin Mountain Park. The documentation is currently in the process of being transmitted to the Prints and photographs Division of the Library of Congress, where it will be available to the public as part of the HABS/HAE/HALS collection. F-6-43 United States Department of the Interior _ National Park Service .~ational Register of ·Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. Han item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 1~900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name Camp (1) Misty Mount Historic District other names/site number 2. Location street & number Catoctin Mountain Park U not for publication city, town Thurmont Gd vicinity state Maryland code MD county Frederick code 021 zip code 21788 3. Classlficatlon Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property Oprivate 0 building(s) Contributing Noncontributing D public-local [iJ district 35 3 buildings D public-State Osite ___ sites [iJ public-Federal 0 structure 1 structures Oobject ___ objects 35 4 Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register __O___ _ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this 0 nomination 0 request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property 0 meets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. 0 See continuation sheet. Signature of certifying official Date State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property 0 meets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. 0 See continuation sheet. Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 5. National Park Service Certification I, hereby, certify that this property is: Oentered in the National Register. 0 See continuation sheet. D determined eligible for the National Register. 0 See continuation sheet. ] determined not eligible for the National Register. D removed from the National Register. Oother, (explain:) - --------~ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action 8. Function or UM Historic Punctions (enter categories from Instructions) Current Functions (enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC/camp/institutional housing DOMESTIC/camp RECREATION & CULTURE/outdoor recreation RECREATION & CULTURE/outdoor recreation LANDSCAPE/forest LANDSCAPE/forest --·~---------------~----~ 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (enter categories from instructions) (enter categories from Instructions) foundation ---"s_.,t.lolo.unso.e ____________ NPS rustic architecture wal~---~c~hwe~sLJt~Dallut__.l~o~g,_gawn~d......_c.ub~inuk11o.-__~ waney bpard roof ___.--1.c~e~d~a~r......:;s~h~i~n~g~l~e~s-------~ other~----------------~ Describe present and historic physical appearance. SUMMARY DESCRIPTIO• The proposed historic district is bounded on the east by the west edge of Park Central Road, from about 800 feet north and down to 2,000 feet south of the camp entrance road; from this southern terminus, northwest approximately 1,800 feet; then northeast, about 2,300 feet; and southeast about 750 feet to meet with the northern terminus of the boundary at Park Central Road. The roughly trapezoidal-shaped district encompasses 72 acres and contains buildings and structures that support overnight organized-camping activities. Among the contributing buildings are a dining hall/kitchen, administration/office, infirmary, staff quarters, helps' quarters, and craft shop/nature cabin. These serve as a hub of buildings shared by occupants of the three individual unit camps. Each unit camp is situated like a satellite group of buildings that includes a latrine, lodge, six 4-person camper cabins, and one or two leaders' cabins. A swimming pool, adjacent shower house/laundry and two unit latrines are modern, non-historic constructions. All contributing buildings in the district are related to two themes: the human and conservation efforts of New Deal programs, and the development of NPS-sponsored rustic architecture in concert with the rise of outdoor recreation. The quality craftsmanship and carefully articulated design of architecture and landscape
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CATOCTIN MOUNTAIN PARK a Resource Assessment
    ® 006 march 2 CATOCTIN MOUNTAIN PARK A Resource Assessment National Parks Conservation Association Protecting Parks for Future Generations® ® Center for State of the Parks More than a century ago, Congress established Yellowstone as the CONTENTS world’s first national park. That single act was the beginning of a remarkable and ongoing effort to protect this nation’s natural, his- torical, and cultural heritage. Today, Americans are learning that national park designation REPORT SUMMARY 1 alone cannot provide full resource protection. Many parks are com- promised by development of adjacent lands, air and water pollution, invasive plants and animals, and rapid increases in motorized recre- KEY FINDINGS 5 ation. Park officials often lack adequate information on the status of and trends in conditions of critical resources. The National Parks Conservation Association initiated the State of the Parks® program in 2000 to assess the condition of natural and THE CATOCTIN ASSESSMENT cultural resources in the parks, and determine how well equipped the 7 National Park Service is to protect the parks—its stewardship capaci- ty. The goal is to provide information that will help policy-makers, NATURAL RESOURCES 7 the public, and the National Park Service improve conditions in Park Provides Haven for Wildlife national parks, celebrate successes as models for other parks, and and Urbanites ensure a lasting legacy for future generations. For more information about the methodology and research used in preparing this report and to learn more about the Center for State CULTURAL RESOURCES 14 of the Parks®, visit www.npca.org/stateoftheparks or contact: NPCA, Park’s History Includes Prehistoric Center for State of the Parks®, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Catoctin Mountain Scenic Byway Plan
    Corridor Management Plan for the US 15 Catoctin Mountain Scenic Byway April 2004 Prepared for: Prepared by: Frederick County, Maryland Lardner/Klein Landscape Architects, P.C. as part of in association with the State of Maryland Scenic Byway Program Daniel Consultants, Inc. John Milner Associates Bay Area Economics Watson Heritage Strategies Shelley Mastran Advisory Committee Marcel Aillery, Carollton Manor Land Trust Sister Joan Angermari, St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Shrine Robert Black, Catoctin Mountain Orchard Nancy Bodmer, President, Carrollton Manor Land Trust Don Briggs, President, Emmitsburg Business & Professional Association G. Bernard Callan, Jr., Fredrick County Historic Preservation Commission Sam Castleman, Resident Joy Clem, Resident Colin Clevenger, Curator, Children’s Museum of Rose Hill Manor Ray Compton, Frederick County Historic Trust John Concannon, Maryland State Highway Administration District 7 Dean Considine, Central Maryland Heritage League Judy Crum, Resident, Frederick County *Janet Davis, Frederick County Division of Planning Tim Davis, City of Frederick Jennifer Dougherty, Mayor, City of Frederick Dale Dowling, Architectural & Cultural Historian Sister Carol Durkin, St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Shrine Cynthia Ecker, Park Manager, Cunningham Falls State Park Richard Fairley, Headmaster, Director Of Development, Prospect Hall Mansion Doug Faris, Superintendent, C&O Canal National Hisotrical Park *John Fieseler, Executive Director, Tourism Council of Frederick County, Inc. Dean Fitzgerald, President, Frederick County
    [Show full text]
  • Catoctin Mountain Park Catoctin Mountain Park Table of Contents
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2002 Catoctin Mountain Park Catoctin Mountain Park Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Catoctin Mountain Park Catoctin Mountain Park Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI), a comprehensive inventory of all cultural landscapes in the national park system, is one of the most ambitious initiatives of the National Park Service (NPS) Park Cultural Landscapes Program. The CLI is an evaluated inventory of all landscapes having historical significance that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or are otherwise managed as cultural resources through a public planning process and in which the NPS has or plans to acquire any legal interest. The CLI identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved CLIs when concurrence with the findings is obtained from the park superintendent and all required data fields are entered into a national database. In addition, for landscapes that are not currently listed on the National Register and/or do not have adequate documentation, concurrence is required from the State Historic Preservation Officer or the Keeper of the National Register. The CLI, like the List of Classified Structures, assists the NPS in its efforts to fulfill the identification and management requirements associated with Section 110(a) of the National Historic Preservation Act, National Park Service Management Policies (2006), and Director’s Order #28: Cultural Resource Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Conservation Programs at Catoctin Mountain Park: a Special Resource Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
    Human Conservation Programs at Catoctin Mountain Park: A Special Resource Study Final April 23, 2015 By Angela R. Sirna Ph.D. Candidate in Public History Middle Tennessee State University EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2011, the Organization of American Historians (OAH), at the behest of the National Park Service (NPS), published Imperiled Promise: The State of History in the National Park Service. Among the twelve recommendations the consultants made, Finding #9 "Stewardship and Interpretation of Agency History" serves as both the purpose and need for this Special Resource Study on Human Conservation Programs at Catoctin Mountain Park. The authors charge that the NPS, despite its vast institutional archives, considers its own story as somehow separate from the history it is mandated with preserving or interpreting. Staff and historians working at Catoctin Mountain Park have made progress in documenting the area’s history, including the NPS’s role. This study, however, brings both the area’s pre-park history and agency history together using one framework. It encourages park staff to use this framework to direct future research initiatives, preservation, and management strategies, while also enriching interpretation and public engagement. "Human conservation" is an idea that originated in the Progressive Era at the turn of the twentieth century and loosely parallels the natural conservation movement that created the national park system during the same period. Shaped by land economists, politicians, and recreation advocates, the guiding principle behind human conservation is that human beings are a vital, national resource (like trees, soil, and water) that should and can be carefully managed to reach their highest potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Retreat Adapted from ​The National Parks Service
    Presidential Retreat adapted from The National Parks Service ​ Catoctin Mountain Park was originally land purchased by the government in 1936, to be developed into a recreational facility. The facility was to demonstrate how rough terrain and eroded soil could be turned into productive land again. Camp Misty Mount was first used by the Maryland League for Crippled Children. After the first year, the League moved to a second camp in 1938, Camp Greentop, because Camp Misty Mount's terrain was difficult to negotiate in a wheelchair. A third camp, Camp Hi-Catoctin, was completed in the winter of 1938-1939 and was used for three years as a family camp for federal employees. President Franklin D. Roosevelt was accustomed to seeking relief from hot Washington, D.C. summers and relaxing on weekends aboard the presidential yacht Potomac or at Hyde Park, NY. In 1942, the U.S. Secret Service were ​ ​ very concerned about the President's continued use of the Potomac. World ​ ​ War II had brought an attack on Pearl Harbor and had drawn German U-boats close in Atlantic waters. Presidential safety and Presidential health were concerns.The muggy climate of Washington, D.C. was considered detrimental to his health, affecting his sinuses. A new retreat, a place to relax, within a 100 mile radius of Washington, D.C. and in the cool mountain air was sought. Several sites were considered, but Camp Hi-Catoctin in the Catoctin Recreational Demonstration Area was selected after the President's first visit on April 22, 1942. A camp was already built on the site and the estimated conversion cost was $18,650.
    [Show full text]
  • Catoctin Mountain Park Administrative History Update
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Capital Area CATOCTIN MOUNTAIN PARK Administrative History Update Elise Elder-Norquist CATOCTIN MOUNTAIN PARK Administrative History Update By Elise Elder-Norquist Presented to Catoctin Mountain Park In Partnership with the Organization of American Historians/National Park Service NATIONAL PARK SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DECEMBER 2020 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under US administration. US Department of the Interior National Park Service Resource Stewardship and Science Washington, DC Publication Credits: Graphics from sources other than federal repositories may not be reproduced without the permission of the owners noted in the captions. Other information in this publication may be copied and used with the condition that full credit be given to the authors and publisher. Appropriate citations and bibliographic credits should be made for each use. Cover Photo: The Catoctin Forest Courtesy of Catoctin Mountain Park, National Park Service iv CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Catoctin Mountain Park Maryland March 2013 Foundation Document
    NatioNal Park Service • U.S. DePartmeNt of the iNterior Foundation Document Catoctin Mountain Park Maryland March 2013 Foundation Document Cover: Autumn colors on Big Hunting Creek. NPS photo Above: Distillery Run. NPS photo ii Catoctin Mountain Park Contents Description of Catoctin Mountain Park 1 Introduction 5 Elements of a Foundation Document 6 Purpose Statement 6 Significance Statements 6 Interpretive Themes 6 fundamental resources and values 6 ­ assessment of Planning and Data Needs 7 ­ Special mandates and administrative commitments 7 ­ laws and Policies and NPS Policy-level conditions 7 ­ Park Purpose 9 Park Significance Statements 10 Interpretive Themes 12 Interpretive Theme 1: People – Life on the Mountain 12 Subthemes: 12 Interpretive Theme 2: Fun – Making Memories 12 Subthemes: 12 Interpretive Theme 3: Renewal – Second Chances 13 Subthemes: 13 Interpretive Theme 4: Renewal – Evolution and Recent History 13 Subthemes: 13 Fundamental Resources and Values 14 Significance Statement 1 14 Overview 14 Significance Statement 2 15 Overview 15 Significance Statement 3 15 Overview 15 iii Foundation Document Significance Statement 4 16 Overview 16 Significance Statement 5 16 Overview 16 Significance Statement 6 16 Significance Statement 7 17 overview 17 ­ Significance Statement 8 17 overview 17 ­ Other Important Resources and Values 19 Natural Sounds / Air Quality / Night Sky 19 Campgrounds and Picnic Areas 19 Trail System 19 Water Quantity and Quality 19 Naval Support Facility - Thurmont 19 Other Historic Structures 20 Archeology 20
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Park Report, Catoctin Mountain Park, Maryland
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior State of the Park Report Catoctin Mountain Park Maryland 2014 National Park Service. 2014. State of the Park Report for Catoctin Mountain Park. State of the Park Series No. 10. National Park Service, Washington, D.C. Disclaimer. This State of the Park report summarizes the current condition of park resources, visitor experience, and park infrastructure as assessed by a combination of available factual information and the expert opinion and professional judgment of park staff and subject matter experts. The internet version of this report provides the associated workshop summary report and additional details and sources of information about the findings summarized in the report, including references, accounts on the origin and quality of the data, and the methods and analytic approaches used in data collection and assessments of condition. This report provides evaluations of status and trends based on interpretation by NPS scientists and managers of both quantitative and non- quantitative assessments and observations. Future condition ratings may differ from findings in this report as new data and knowledge become available. The park superintendent approved the publication of this report. Executive Summary The mission of the National Park Service is to preserve unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of national parks for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. NPS Management Policies (2006) state that “The Service will also strive to ensure that park resources and values are passed on to future generations in a condition that is as good as, or better than, the conditions that exist today.” As part of the stewardship of national parks for the American people, the NPS has begun to develop State of the Park reports to assess the overall status and trends of each park’s resources.
    [Show full text]