Life Before Pharmacare

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Life Before Pharmacare LIFE BEFORE PHARMACARE Report on the Canadian Health Coalition’s Hearings into a Universal Public Drug Plan LIFE BEFORE PHARMACARE: Report on the Canadian Health Coalition’s Hearings into a Universal Public Drug Plan November 2008 isbn 978-1-897569-07-8 Please make a donation to the CCPA... Help us continue to offer our publications free online. The Canadian Centre for policy alternatives make most of our publications available free on our website. Making a donation or taking out a membership will help us continue to provide people with access to our ideas and research free of charge. You can make a donation or become a member on-line at www.policyalternatives. ca. Or you can contact the National office at 613-563-1341 for more information. Suggested donation for this publication: $10 or what you can afford. This report is available free of charge from the CCPA website at www.policyalternatives.ca. Printed copies may be ordered through the National Office for a $12 fee. 410 – 75 Albert Street, Ottawa, Ontario k1p 5e7 tel 613-563-1341 email [email protected] www.policyalternatives.ca 2841 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1V 8X7 www.medicare.ca CONTENTS Summary: Life Before Pharmacare .............................................................................5 1 Canadians Speak Up About the Suffering Caused by Inaction on Pharmacare ......7 2 The Reasons for Inequity .....................................................................................9 3 Problems Caused by Excessive Drug Costs and the Patchwork Approach ...........11 4 Stories from Across Canada ...............................................................................13 The Low Income Trap ........................................................................................13 Chronically High Costs ......................................................................................14 Caught in Government Red Tape ......................................................................16 Ponying Up for a Work-based Plan ....................................................................17 Laid Off from the Drug Plan ..............................................................................18 Paying the Price for New and Expensive Drugs ..................................................19 The Cost of a Move to a Different Province .......................................................21 Drug Coverage in the Pre-Retirement Years .......................................................22 Young Adults Shut Out of Drug Coverage .........................................................23 Life-Sustaining Drugs Not Covered by Provincial Plans ......................................24 5 Drug Insurance in Québec .................................................................................26 6 Conclusion ........................................................................................................28 7 Recommendations ............................................................................................30 Notes .....................................................................................................................31 Participants in Pharmacare Hearings .......................................................................32 ACKNOWLEDGMEnts The Canadian Health Coalition thanks the many people and organizations who made these hearings possible, including the organizers, volunteers, resource people, moderators, presenters, and participants. Thanks also to the following organizations whose financial assistance made the hearings and this publication possible: • Canadian Auto Workers • CAW Retired Workers • Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions • Canadian Labour Congress • Canadian Union of Postal Workers • Canadian Union of Public Employees • Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada • Congress of Union Retirees of Canada • Inter Pares • National Union of Public and General Employees • Public Service Alliance of Canada • United Steelworkers of America DEDICATION To those who shared their stories, their suffering, and their hopes for the future. To the memory of: • René Quigley, organizer of the Halifax hearing • Jim Connor, presenter at the Halifax hearing • Marion Dewar, chairperson of the Ottawa hearing 4 CANADIAN CENTRE FOR POLICY AltERNATIVES and CANADIAN HEALTH COALITION SUMMARY Life Before Pharmacare IN THE FALL OF 2007, the Canadian Health Coalition (CHC) began a series of groundbreaking hearings in communities across the country. It was the first time that public hearings had been organized to deal specifically with Canadians’ experiences and insights regarding the cost, effectiveness, appropriateness, and availability of prescription drugs. This report features the stories told by people who appeared at the hearings. For example, Gretta Ross of Sarnia, Ontario, who said: “The burden of a loved one being sick in front of you and going down with dementia, is enough. Last year we were $6,000 in debt with drug bills. Now we are faced with losing our home. We both worked hard all our lives and I don’t think that’s right.” Over 250 people made presentations at the hearings. Many spoke of their personal experiences with injuries, illnesses, and chronic conditions that require prescription drugs. Doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and social workers spoke about the difficulties faced by their patients and clients because prescription drugs are not within reach. The stories collected in this report will help explain to politicians, policy- makers and journalists why we urgently need a national drug plan and better management of pharmaceuticals in health care. Canadians tend to believe that everyone is taken care of when it comes to prescription drugs. We think that elderly people are covered by provincial drug plans; that people in need are covered by social assistance; and that working people get drug coverage through employer benefit plans. But the hearings, and much research in the field, show this is not the case. Many Canadians do not LIFE BEFORE PHARMACARE 5 have drug coverage of any kind, and those who do are facing exorbitant and ever-increasing costs. Medicare, our universal, public health care insurance plan, was introduced over 40 years ago. Since then, pharmaceuticals have fundamentally changed the nature of health care and yet they are still not included in Medicare. Instead, we have a patchwork of private and public plans that are full of holes, leaving many Canadians without comprehensive drug coverage. Some people can afford to pay for drug insurance or the drugs themselves, but others cannot. This situation is reminiscent of the days before Medicare, so this report is called “Life Before Pharmacare.” At the end of this report, there is a list of recommended actions needed to rectify this inequity. At the top of the list is a call for a universal public drug plan that would be cost-shared by federal and provincial governments and employers, and administered by provinces and territories. This is what many people at the hearings called for. In the words of Philip Lillies of Moncton, whose wife who suffers from multiple sclerosis: “Efficiency is one of the strongest arguments for implementing a comprehensive, universal pharmacare program. The hodge-podge of programs that attempt to substitute for it is not only unfair; they are also costly both in a financial sense and a social sense.” For information on the Canadian Health Coalition’s Pharmacare Campaign, visit www.healthcoalition.ca/pharmacare-now.html. 6 CANADIAN CENTRE FOR POLICY AltERNATIVES and CANADIAN HEALTH COALITION 1 Canadians Speak Up About the Suffering Caused by Inaction on Pharmacare IN THE FALL OF 2007, the Canadian Health Coalition (CHC) began a series of groundbreaking hearings in communities across Canada. It was the first time that public hearings had been organized to deal specifically with Canadians’ experiences and insights regarding the cost, effectiveness, appropriateness, and availability of prescription drugs. Hearings were open to everyone with an inter- est in a public drug insurance plan. The stories collected in this report will help explain to politicians, policy-makers and journalists why Canadians urgently need a national drug plan and better management of pharmaceuticals in health care. As the hearings moved from British Columbia to the Northwest Territories to Newfoundland, Canadians from all walks of life spoke about the impact on their lives of the rising cost of pharmaceuticals. Many wondered why drugs are covered by provincial health care plans if a person is hospitalized, but it’s pay- as-you-go as soon as a patient is discharged. Others asked if prescription drugs have become the answer for almost all medical ailments when in many cases other less expensive treatments would be more effective. Still others were frus- trated by a confusing patchwork of provincial drug plans that meant a person’s prescriptions were covered in one province but not in another. In total, over 250 people made presentations during the hearings. Many spoke of their personal experiences with injuries, illnesses, and chronic condi- tions that require prescription drugs. Doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and social workers spoke about the difficulties faced by their patients and clients because prescription drugs are not within reach. Some presenters spoke as representa- tives of organizations such as social planning councils, political parties, unions, and advocacy groups. LIFE BEFORE PHARMACARE 7 As the hearings stretched from October
Recommended publications
  • Does the International Narcotics Control Board
    Clark JD, Johnson M, Fabowale B, Farrelly M, Currow D. Does the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) sufficiently prioritise enablement of access to therapeutic opioids? A systematic critical analysis of six INCB annual reports, 1968-2018. Journal of Global Health Reports. 2020;4:e2020042. Research Articles Does the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) sufficiently prioritise enablement of access to therapeutic opioids? A systematic critical analysis of six INCB annual reports, 1968-2018 Joseph D Clark 1, Miriam Johnson 1 , Blessing Fabowale 1, Michael Farrelly 2 , David Currow 3 1 Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, University of Hull, Hull, UK , 2 Faculty of Arts Cultures and Education, University of Hull, Hull, UK , 3 Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, University of Hull, Hull, UK; IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia Keywords: opioids, analgesics, narcotics, drug legislation, controlled substances, pain management, palliative care Journal of Global Health Reports Vol. 4, 2020 Background The International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) has overseen international drug control since 1968 with the dual remit of restricting illicit production and use of controlled substances, whilst enabling access for clinical purposes. Two opioid crises are present under its jurisdiction: i) abuse, dependence and premature mortality in high-income countries; and ii) inadequate supply of opioids for clinical purposes for most of the world represented almost exclusively by low- and middle-income countries. Methods Systematic critical analysis using corpus linguistics as a method of document analysis to investigate the regulatory climate promoted by the INCB, through language used regarding opioids in a representative sample of annual Reports, 1968-2018.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. the Capital Budget Winnipeg's
    Contributors This guide is the first Betty Braaksma step in a four-part Manitoba Library Association Canadian Centre for Policy Marianne Cerilli Social Planning Council of Winnipeg Alternatives-Manitoba Lynne Fernandez (CCPA-Mb) project to Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Manitoba engage Winnipeggers in Jesse Hajer Canadian Community Economic Development municipal decision-making. Network Step Two is a survey of George Harris key municipal spending Ian Hudson Department of Economics areas, Step Three will be an University of Manitoba in-depth response to this Bob Kury spring’s 2008 Operating Dennis Lewycky CCPA Board Member Budget, and Step Four will Lindsey McBain be our Alternative City Canadian Community Economic Development Network Budget, to be released in Tom Simms the fall of 2008. Many thanks to Liz Carlye of the Canadian Federation of Students CANADIAN CENTRE FOR POLICY (Manitoba) and Doug Smith for their ALTERNATIVES-MB help with production. 309-323 Portage Ave. Winnipeg, MB Canada R3B 2C1 ph: (204) 927-3200 fax: (204) 927-3201 [email protected] www.policyalternatives.ca A Citizens’ Guide to Understanding Winnipeg’s City Budgets 1 Introduction innipeg City Council spends more than one billion dollars a year running our city. From the moment we get up in the morning, most of us benefit from the Wservices that our taxes provide. We wash up with water that is piped in through a city-built and operated water works, we walk our children to school on city sidewalks, go to work on city buses, drive on city streets that have been cleared of snow by the City.
    [Show full text]
  • DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS
    Second Session - Fortieth Legislature of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS Official Report (Hansard) Published under the authority of The Honourable Daryl Reid Speaker Vol. LXV No. 104 - 1:30 p.m., Monday, September 9, 2013 ISSN 0542-5492 MANITOBA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Fortieth Legislature Member Constituency Political Affiliation ALLAN, Nancy, Hon. St. Vital NDP ALLUM, James Fort Garry-Riverview NDP ALTEMEYER, Rob Wolseley NDP ASHTON, Steve, Hon. Thompson NDP BJORNSON, Peter, Hon. Gimli NDP BLADY, Sharon Kirkfield Park NDP BRAUN, Erna Rossmere NDP BRIESE, Stuart Agassiz PC CALDWELL, Drew Brandon East NDP CHIEF, Kevin, Hon. Point Douglas NDP CHOMIAK, Dave, Hon. Kildonan NDP CROTHERS, Deanne St. James NDP CULLEN, Cliff Spruce Woods PC DEWAR, Gregory Selkirk NDP DRIEDGER, Myrna Charleswood PC EICHLER, Ralph Lakeside PC EWASKO, Wayne Lac du Bonnet PC FRIESEN, Cameron Morden-Winkler PC GAUDREAU, Dave St. Norbert NDP GERRARD, Jon, Hon. River Heights Liberal GOERTZEN, Kelvin Steinbach PC GRAYDON, Cliff Emerson PC HELWER, Reg Brandon West PC HOWARD, Jennifer, Hon. Fort Rouge NDP IRVIN-ROSS, Kerri, Hon. Fort Richmond NDP JHA, Bidhu Radisson NDP KOSTYSHYN, Ron, Hon. Swan River NDP LEMIEUX, Ron, Hon. Dawson Trail NDP MACKINTOSH, Gord, Hon. St. Johns NDP MAGUIRE, Larry Arthur-Virden PC MALOWAY, Jim Elmwood NDP MARCELINO, Flor, Hon. Logan NDP MARCELINO, Ted Tyndall Park NDP MELNICK, Christine, Hon. Riel NDP MITCHELSON, Bonnie River East PC NEVAKSHONOFF, Tom Interlake NDP OSWALD, Theresa, Hon. Seine River NDP PALLISTER, Brian Fort Whyte PC PEDERSEN, Blaine Midland PC PETTERSEN, Clarence Flin Flon NDP REID, Daryl, Hon. Transcona NDP ROBINSON, Eric, Hon. Kewatinook NDP RONDEAU, Jim, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Drug Law Reform Foundation
    Can Australia respond to drugs more eFectively and safely? Roundtable report of law enforcement and other practitioners, researchers and advocates. Sydney, September 2015 Editors1 Roundtable Mick Palmer, report of Alex law enforcement Wodak, Bob and other Douglas practitioners, and Lyn researchers Stephens and advocates. Sydney, September 2015 “You are hamstrung by restrictions about what you can and cannot do. In alcohol prohibition in the United States the treatment of people with alcohol problems disappeared. You try and get treatment for your alcohol problem in Saudi Arabia today and it is not available. One of the negatives about drug prohibition when we see everything through a criminal justice lens is that drug treatment sufers. That is because it is treated as an adjunct to law enforcement rather than redefining the issue primarily as a health and social problem such as breast cancer, diabetes, high blood pressure. If we treated the drug problem as a health and social problem we would have new and better ways to manage it.” [Participant comment] Title for media purposes: “Can Australia respond to drugs more efectively and safely?” Australia21 Ltd ABN 25096242410 CAN 096242410 PO Box 3244, Weston, ACT 2611 Phone: 02 6288 0823 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.australia21.org.au Design by Lester Bunnell, Paper Monkey ISBN: 978-0-9953842-1-7 Published: November 2016 Can Australia respond to drugs more eFectively and safely? Editors Mick Palmer, Alex Wodak, Bob Douglas and Lyn Stephens Roundtable report of law enforcement and other practitioners, researchers and advocates. Sydney, September 2015 While this report has been prepared for Australia21 in consultation with the participants, the views expressed do not reflect the views of all participants on every issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Mexico? Towards an Integrated Approach in the War on Drugs
    SMALL WARS JOURNAL smallwarsjournal.com Plan Mexico? Towards an Integrated Approach in the War on Drugs by Alfonso Reyes The illegal drug trade has been present in Mexico since the beginning of the twentieth century when prohibition of the opium trade started. Since then, the social harm of the illegal drug trade in all its forms has been constantly increasing. Today, the most obvious example of the social harm of the illegal drug trade in Mexico is drug-related crime. As a result, Mexican authorities have launched a frontal attack against the drug cartels in an effort to reduce drug- related violence. However, the results of these efforts have not been as expected. One of the main problems that Mexican authorities face in their war on drugs is the lack of a well- coordinated anti-drug strategy to fight the illegal drug trade. Further, the efforts made by the Mexican government are based on a supply-reduction approach that has proved ineffective both in Mexico and around the world over the last century because it is not aimed at the social roots of the illegal drug trade. Thus, Mexico’s war on drugs has become a never-ending story. This thesis traces this history and then proposes a broader integrated approach based on attacking the roots of the illegal drug trade in Mexico. Part I: The “War on Drugs” in Mexico For more than ten years, the Mexican ment forces in the latter’s unsuccessful at- government has been following the same tempt to curtail or eliminate the illegal drug anti-drug policy in an effort to deter the il- trade.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNCIL of the CITY of WINNIPEG Wednesday, February 24, 2010
    COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WINNIPEG Wednesday, February 24, 2010 The Council met at 9:35 a.m. The Clerk advised the Speaker that a quorum was present. The Speaker called the meeting to order. The opening prayer was read by Councillor Swandel. ROLL CALL Clerk: Mr. Speaker, Councillor Lazarenko, His Worship Mayor Katz; Councillors Browaty, Clement, Fielding, Gerbasi, Nordman, Orlikow, Pagtakhan, Smith, Swandel, Thomas, Vandal, Wyatt. INTRODUCTION AND WELCOME OF GUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Speaker: Thank you. We have Pages. Nick Bruneau of Garden City Collegiate, resides in the Mynarski Ward. Welcome. Marianne Cerilli; an instructor with Red River Community College together with her students from the Red River College in the Economic Development Program. Are you there Marianne? They're not here yet? Thank you. Mr. Mayor. Mayor Katz: Mr. Speaker, I thank you. Just a brief comment. First of all, congratulating all of our Canadian Athletes performing in the Winter Olympics in Vancouver, Whistler, etc. Specifically, obviously the ones from Manitoba. A big congratulations to Jon Montgomery who won gold medal from Russell, Manitoba, as well as the Athletes from the balance of Manitoba and Winnipeg who continue to strive to do their best to represent our Country and make us proud, and I think it's been exciting for all Canadians who have had the opportunity to participate in the impromptu singing of “Oh Canada” during certain events, again, a phenomenal job. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Councillor Pagtakhan, just a minute. MINUTES Councillor Nordman moves that the Minutes of the meeting held on January 27, 2010, be taken as read and confirmed.
    [Show full text]
  • LSE-IDEAS-Ending the Drug Wars
    Ending the Drug Wars Report of the LSE Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy Ending the Drug Wars Report of the LSE Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy, May 2014 Foreword It is time to end the ‘war on drugs’ and massively redirect resources towards effective evidence-based policies underpinned by rigorous economic analysis. The pursuit of a militarised and enforcement-led global ‘war on drugs’ strategy has produced enormous negative outcomes and collateral damage. These include mass incarceration in the US, highly repressive policies in Asia, vast corruption and political destabilisation in Afghanistan and West Africa, immense violence in Latin America, an HIV epidemic in Russia, an acute global shortage of pain medication and the propagation of systematic human rights abuses around the world. The strategy has failed based on its own terms. Evidence shows that drug prices have been declining while purity has been increasing. This has been despite drastic increases in global enforcement spending. Continuing to spend vast resources on punitive enforcement-led policies, generally at the expense of proven public health policies, can no longer be justified. The United Nations has for too long tried to enforce a repressive, ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach. It must now take the lead in advocating a new cooperative international framework based on the fundamental acceptance that different policies will work for different countries and regions. This new global drug strategy should be based on principles of public health, harm reduction, illicit market impact reduction, expanded access to essential medicines, minimisation of problematic consumption, rigorously monitored regulatory experimentation and an unwavering commitment to principles of human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Whats Inside This Edition of LONDONCALLING?
    Welcome once again to London Calling, our third edition at Tysers. We have our usual mix of articles, interviews and features as well pictures of their day in Lloyd’s. We should never as details on some of Tysers various product forget the debt we owe such people. lines. We received tremendous feedback NEWS from our last edition earlier in the year, and The market remains stubbornly stuck in a negative London Calling was circulated to over 20,000 gear, highly over-capitalised, particularly so in liability people in the insurance sector both in London lines of business, with almost saturation levels of and throughout the United States. competing markets bringing down rates and with it We are delighted to feature in this edition, underwriting standards. Blind pursuit of volume and Lloyd’s of London’s new Chief Executive Officer, market share will continue unabated until a correction, the outstanding Inga Beale, giving London which we believe is some way away. The much improved Calling a 20 questions interview, also stalwart There is however, genuinely better news on the economic situation underwriter, economic front as the United States (and the UK) have some cogentDavid thoughts Nicholson from ofWes Beazley. Butcher We achieve considerable growth and are now driving should prove to be a of Atrium. On a lighter note we have Camp strongly away from the recession that has so dented economic fortunes throughout the world big boost all round” Freddie (aka Paul Emuss) detailing his Italian charity scooter ride, our regular ‘Dear Bill’ since 2008. David Doe letter competition as well as ‘name the face’ a It has been a long time coming, but the much Editor picture of a leading market figure in an unusual improved economic situation should prove to be a situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007-2008
    Social Planning Council of Winnipeg est. 1919 R Raising Community Awareness 2007/08 Annual Report for 89 Years! 412 McDermot Avenue Winnipeg MB, R3A 0A9 www.spcw.mb.ca Just Responsive Caring Action Oriented Leadership RaISING COMMUNITY AWARENESS Resources Grass roots Developing Table of Contents President’s Report 1 CSI Site Synopsis 2 Executive Director’s Report 3 Urban Inuit Project 4 Campaign 2000 Continues Report 5 Falling Fortunes 6 Poverty Advisory Committee Report 7 Homeless Individuals and Families Information System 8 Committee for the Elimination of Racism and Discrimination Report 9 2007 Manitoba Child and Family Poverty Report Card 10 Environment Committee Report 11 Raise the Rates 12 Auditor’s Report 13 Financial Report 14 Raise: to give rise to; to bring about Student’s Report 15 Meeting Strategic Priorities 16 Staff, Board, Committee Chairs 17 Staff, Board, Committee Chairs 18 Page i Presidents Report It was an honor to be asked to serve as President of the Social Planning Council of Winnipeg (SPC) this past year. Even before arriving in Winnipeg, I had a sense of appreciation for the important work being done at the SPC. The agency has an accomplished history that I am happy to have been a part of. The work at SPC would not be possible without a group of passionate people to contribute to each project and event. I extend much thanks to Wayne Helgason, the staff, and the Board members who served throughout the year. I would like to express great appreciation to the Committee Chairs for their ideas and enthusiasm towards SPC’s various projects, efforts, and endeavours.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly of Manitoba DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS
    . Second Session - Thirty-Sixth Legislature of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS (Hansard) Published under the authority of The Honourable Louise M Dacquay Speaker Vol. XLVI No. 42A- 1:30 p.m., Wednesday, May 29, 1996 ISSN 0542-5492 MANITOBA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Thirty-Sixth Legislature Members, Constituencies and Political Affiliation Name Constituency bJ:ty ASHTON, Steve Thompson N.D.P. BARRETT, Becky Wellington N.D.P. CERILLI, Marianne Radisson N.D.P. CHOMIAK, Dave Kildonan N.D.P. CUMMINGS, Glen, Hon. Ste. Rose P.C. DACQUAY, Louise, Hon. Seine River P.C. DERKACH, Leonard, Hon. Rob lin-Russell P.C. DEWAR, Gregory Selkirk N.D.P. DOER, Gary Concordia N.D.P. DOWNEY, James, Hon. Arthur-Virden P.C. DRIEDGER, Albert, Hon. Steinbach P.C. DYCK, Peter Pembina P.C. ENNS, Harry, Hon. Lakeside P.C. ERNST, Jim, Hon. Charleswood P.C. EVANS, Clif Interlake N.D.P. EVANS, Leonard S. Brandon East N.D.P. FILMON, Gary, Hon. Tuxedo P.C. FINDLAY, Glen, Hon. Springfield P.C. FRIESEN, Jean Wolseley N.D.P. GAUDRY, Neil St. Boniface Lib. GILLESHAMMER, Harold, Hon. Minnedosa P.C. HELWER, Edward Gimli P.C. HICKES, George Point Douglas N.D.P. JENNISSEN, Gerard Flin Flon N.D.P. KOWALSKI, Gary The Maples Lib. LAMOUREUX, Kevin Inkster Lib. LATHLIN, Oscar The Pas N.D.P. LAURENDEAU, Marcel St. Norbert P.C. MACKINTOSH, Gord St. Johns N.D.P. MALOWA Y, Jim Elmwood N.D.P. MARTINDALE, Doug Burrows N.D.P. McALPINE, Gerry Sturgeon Creek P.C. McCRAE, James, Hon. Brandon West P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Votes Received/ Comptes Rendus Des Votes Obtenus
    Table/Tableau D Summary of Votes Received/ Comptes rendus des votes obtenus Electoral Division Candidate Party Votes Received Percent of Votes Cast Arthur-Virden Larry N. Maguire PC 4215 48.87% Perry Kalynuk NDP/NPD 3063 35.51% Bob Brigden Lib. 1281 14.85% Assiniboia Jim Rondeau NDP/NPD 4347 44.00% Linda McIntosh PC 4344 43.97% J. Deborah Shiloff Lib. 1136 11.50% Brandon East Drew Caldwell NDP/NPD 4840 60.84% Brandon Est Marty Snelling PC 2080 26.15% Don Jessiman Ind. 525 6.60% Peter Logan Lib. 453 5.69% Brandon West Scott Smith NDP/NPD 4898 48.89% Brandon Ouest Jim McCrae PC 4546 45.38% Lisa Roy Lib. 407 4.06% Lisa Gallagher CPC-M/Comm. 92 0.92% Burrows Doug Martindale NDP/NPD 5151 65.87% Mike Babinsky Lib. 1849 23.64% Cheryl Clark PC 724 9.26% Darrell Rankin CPC-M/Comm. 41 0.52% Carman Denis Rocan PC 3698 48.81% Raymond Le Neal Lib. 2291 30.24% Diane Beresford NDP/NPD 1519 20.05% Charleswood Myrna Driedger PC 5437 54.46% Alana McKenzie Lib. 2323 23.27% Darryl Livingstone NDP/NPD 2176 21.80% Concordia Gary Doer NDP/NPD 5691 69.67% Paul Murphy PC 1898 23.24% Chris Hlady Lib. 444 5.44% Dave Nickarz GPM/Verts 87 1.07% Circonscription Candidat(e) Parti Nombre de voix Pourcentage électorale obtenues des suffrages exprimés en faveur du (de la) candidat(e) 8 Statement of Votes/Relevé des suffrages Electoral Division Candidate Party Votes Received Percent of Votes Cast Dauphin-Roblin Stan Struthers NDP/NPD 5596 55.44% Lorne Boguski PC 4001 39.64% Doug McPhee MP 455 4.51% Elmwood Jim Maloway NDP/NPD 5176 62.13% Elsie Bordynuik PC 2659 31.92% Cameron Neumann LPM/PLM 320 3.84% James Hogaboam CPC-M/Comm.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly of Manitoba DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS
    Fourth Session - Thirty-Sixth Legislature of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS Official Report (Hansard) Published under the authority of The Honourable Louise M. Dacquay Speaker Vol. XLVIII No. 24 - 1:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 25, 1998 ISSN 0542-5492 MANITOBA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Thirty-Sixth Legislature Member Constituency Political Affiliation ASHTON, Steve Thompson N.D.P. BARRETI, Becky Wellington N.D.P. CERILLI, Marianne Radisson N.D.P. CHOMIAK, Dave Kildonan N.D.P. CUMMINGS, Glen, Hon. Ste. Rose P.C. DACQUAY, Louise, Hon. Seine River P.C. DERKACH, Leonard, Hon. Rob lin-Russell P.C. DEWAR, Gregory Selkirk N.D.P. DOER, Gary Concordia N.D.P. DOWNEY, James, Hon. Arthur-Virden P.C. DRIEDGER, Albert Steinbach P.C. DYCK, Peter Pembina P.C. ENNS, Harry, Hon. Lakeside P.C. EVANS, Clif Interlake N.D.P. EVANS, Leonard S. Brandon East N.D.P. FAURSCHOU, David Portage Ia Prairie P.C. FILMON, Gary, Hon. Tuxedo P.C. FINDLAY, Glen, Hon. Springfield P.C. FRIESEN, Jean Wolseley N.D.P. GAUDRY, Neil St. Boniface Lib. GILLESHAMMER, Harold, Hon. Minnedosa P.C. HEL WER, Edward Gimli P.C. HICKES, George Point Douglas N.D.P. JENNISSEN, Gerard Flin Flon N.D.P. KOWALSKI, Gary The Maples Lib. LAMOUREUX, Kevin Inkster Lib. LATHLIN, Oscar The Pas N.D.P. LAURENDEAU, Marcel St. Norbert P.C. MACKINTOSH, Gord St. Johns N.D.P. MALOWAY, Jim Elmwood N.D.P. MARTINDALE, Doug Burrows N.D.P. McALPINE, Gerry Sturgeon Creek P.C. McCRAE, James, Hon. Brandon West P.C. McGIFFORD, Diane Osborne N.D.P.
    [Show full text]