DOCSLIB.ORG

The Asia Pacific Internet Peering Guidebook (V1.9) William B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Asia Pacific Internet Peering Guidebook (V1.9) William B D R A F T 1.9 William B. Norton The Asia Pacific Internet Peering Guidebook (v1.9) William B. Norton <[email protected]> Abstract How does Internet Peering work in Asia? How is it different from Peering in the U.S. or Europe? If International Peering is different across the globe, Introduction: The Global Internet Ecosystem what does one need to know before expanding a network into a new country? Internet Peering in Asia The Internet is best described as a network of has largely been undocumented, with the popular networks. An Internet Operations view of this system perception in the Internet Operations community that reveals sets of players, each with motivations and Internet Peering in Asia is “just different”. This observed behaviors in common within geographical research provides a framework for comparing areas that I will call Internet Peering Ecosystems. Internet Ecosystems with a little more specificity, Definitions. Within each of these Internet Peering based on conversations with about one hundred Ecosystems we find at least three categories of International Peering Coordinators that have built players: into and within Asia. These International Peering Coordinators shared ten specific lessons they wish • Tier 1 ISPs (ISPs that have access to all they had learned prior to their Asian expansion. the Internet Peering Ecosystem routes solely through free peering This White Paper begins by introducing the Internet relationships), as a set of loosely connect Internet Ecosystems (countries typically), each with at least three • Tier 2 ISPs (that must buy transit from categories of players. We define each category of someone to reach routes within the player, their position in the “Internet Ecosystem” Internet Peering Ecosystem), and along with their corresponding motivations that • Content Providers who don’t sell access explains their peering behaviors. to the Internet but offer content. In the process of the research we identified the “Foreign Tier 1 Peering Dynamic.” This dynamic is not limited to Asia but indeed exists globally, where Tier 1 ISPs in one Internet Peering Ecosystem are relegated to Tier 2 ISPs as they expand into a foreign Internet Peering Ecosystem. We explain why this occurs by applying the aforementioned definitions and motivations. To apply these definitions and share some of the more interesting country-specific insights shared by the Peering Coordinators, we have identified the key players in four specific Internet Peering Ecosystems; Japan, Singapore, Australia and Hong Kong. We apply the “Business Case for Peering” methodology using current transit and peering costs in each Peering Ecosystem. We then share five reasons the Peering Coordinators said that they expanded into and within Asia, along with four strategies for interconnecting within Asia. Ten “Lessons Learned” finish up the section of Figure 1 - The Global Internet Peering collective knowledge from the group. In this section Ecosystem we also present rough transport/colo/transit pricing figures so the reader can better appreciate the These rough classifications and definitions are differences in Internet Ecosystems across Asia. This important because they help us understand each is necessary to understand the financial sides to the player’s motivations as reflected in their observed peering-transport-transit equation. behavior. Motivation and Behavior. Tier 1 ISPs do not need to William B. Norton Page 1 2/10/10 DRAFT The Asia Pacific Internet Peering Guidebook W. B. Norton buy transit since by definition they can reach all the if you have a pulse we will peer with you!” Content networks in the Internet Peering Ecosystem solely Players and most Tier 2 ISPs seek to reduce their through free peering relationships. Stated most transit fees by peering broadly by announcing to the eloquently by Waqar Khan (Qwest, a Tier 1 ISP in peering community that they have an Open Peering the U.S.), “We have all the peering we need.” It is not Policy. surprising that Tier 1 ISPs see the rest of the players While these broad categories of players and their in the Internet Peering Ecosystem players as potential peering policies do not capture all facets of the customers, and do not seek peering with them. In fact, markets, they do provide the broad strokes needed to James Spenceley (Comindico) went through the understand some of the International peering process of negotiating peering with the Tier 1 ISPs in interplay that we will discuss in this paper. Australia and described the Tier 1 peering negotiation tactics in a one word acronym: MILD: Make It Long The rest of this paper focuses on several Asia and Difficult1. This reflects the ISP’s underlying Pacific Peering Ecosystems. First we will start with Peering Inclination, perhaps articulated in their some observations common across the Asia Peering Peering Policy discussed next. Ecosystems, some interesting peering behaviors that we haven’t documented in the research to date. We Peering Policies then finish this section with an overview of four Definition: A Restrictive Peering Policy is an Internet Peering Ecosystems: Japan, Singapore, articulation of an inclination not to peer. A Tier 1 ISP Australia and Hong Kong, highlighting the key may have a posted peering policy indicating that they players, recent trends and disruptions in the peering will peer with ISPs of similar size and scale that meet ecosystems, and the Business Case for Peering in them in a large number of locations in a certain each Peering Ecosystem using recent prices for number of countries with a certain large traffic transport, transit, collocation and Exchange Point volume. In this research, several Tier 2 ISPs have fees. expressed frustration that once they met these stated Editor’s Notes: To illustrate points made in this requirements, the requirements were immediately paper we polled people for estimated prices of local adjusted upwards just out of reach. This demonstrates loops, transit, transpacific transport, etc. All prices the Restrictive Peering Policy underlying foundation - shown are in U.S. Dollars (unless otherwise an inclination not to peer. indicated), and should be assumed to be volatile and Definition: A Selective Peering Policy is an for illustration and comparison purposes only. articulation of an inclination to peer, but with some Example: The Foreign Tier 1 Peering conditions. A Selective Peering Policy details Dynamic prerequisites that must be met, and when met, will generally lead to peering. Some ISPs for example Some International ISPs described the Asia Pacific require multiple interconnect points across a country Peering Ecosystems as “mysterious”, with the only with a minimum amount of traffic in order for it to be discernable behaviors exhibited being those of worth the engineer’s time to set up the peering protection of the domestic market. session. Large Tier 2 ISPs often have Selective “Protection of turf is much stronger in Asia than in Peering Policies; they want to peer, but have a the U.S. or Europe.” – Large European ISP threshold to pass in order for it to be worthwhile. The difference between the Selective and the Restrictive Conversations with both in-country and foreign peering policy is somewhat subjective but is based on Peering Coordinators however reveal that there are the underlying intent; a restrictive peer does not want two sides to this story. This interplay is described to peer with anyone else so sets requirements next as the “Foreign Tier 1 Peering Dynamic.” arbitrarily high such that almost no one is qualified to peer with them. Definition: The Foreign Tier 1 Peering Dynamic occurs when a Tier 1 ISP in one Internet Peering Definition: An Open Peering Policy is an Ecosystem expands into another Internet Peering articulation of an inclination to peer with anyone. Ecosystem and is relegated to a Tier 2 ISP status in Brokaw Price from Yahoo! calls this “pulse peering; that foreign Internet Peering Ecosystem. This dynamic is illustrated in the example figure below, where UUNet (a Tier 1 ISP in the U.S.) 1 James presented this at the APRICOT 2004 Peering Track expanded into Japan in the mid-1990’s. in Kuala Lumpur March 26th. 2 DRAFT The Asia Pacific Internet Peering Guidebook W. B. Norton traffic to Japan, 2) make it easier for NTT to sell access to the UUNet international customer base, 3) pay the cost to haul all of this Japan traffic around the world!2 As a result the UUNet negotiating position is likely to be that they will only bring their Asia Regional routes for peering in Japan, and not their large number of desirable U.S. and European customer routes. Since peering NTTs relatively large number of routes with UUNets relatively small number of regional routes doesn’t make business sense for NTT, the deal is unlikely to go through. Figure 2 - Foreign Tier 1 Peering Dynamic In some cases, the discussion of “reciprocal in- To demonstrate this dynamic, consider this country peering” comes up (you peer with me in your Peering Coordinator’s story. Several years ago over a country and I’ll peer with you in mine), but the dinner in Tokyo, the author was told that “UUNet is negotiations often get mired in definitions and one of the largest ISPs in the world, but we can’t get perceptions of “equal benefits”. It is not surprising peering with any of the Tier 1 ISPs here in Japan, and that these reciprocal peering deals don’t occur very have a hard time even getting Peering with the Tier 2 often. ISPs!” To continue with our example, in this scenario, What is going on here? UUNet also has difficulty getting peering with the Tier 2 ISPs. Let’s look at the incentive/disincentive Understanding the Request for Peering with for the Tier 2 ISPs to peer with this foreign (U.S.- the Foreign Tier 1 ISP.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EMI Assessment
    TWIN CREEK WIND FARM EMI Assessment Twin Creek Energy Pty Ltd Report No.: 170894-AUME-R-02, Rev. E Date: 26 June 2017 Status: Final IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER 1. This document is intended for the sole use of the Customer as detailed on the front page of this document to whom the document is addressed and who has entered into a written agreement with the DNV GL entity issuing this document (“DNV GL”). To the extent permitted by law, neither DNV GL nor any group company (the "Group") assumes any responsibility whether in contract, tort including without limitation negligence, or otherwise howsoever, to third parties (being persons other than the Customer), and no company in the Group other than DNV GL shall be liable for any loss or damage whatsoever suffered by virtue of any act, omission or default (whether arising by negligence or otherwise) by DNV GL, the Group or any of its or their servants, subcontractors or agents. This document must be read in its entirety and is subject to any assumptions and qualifications expressed therein as well as in any other relevant communications in connection with it. This document may contain detailed technical data which is intended for use only by persons possessing requisite expertise in its subject matter. 2. This document is protected by copyright and may only be reproduced and circulated in accordance with the Document Classification and associated conditions stipulated or referred to in this document and/or in DNV GL’s written agreement with the Customer. No part of this document may be disclosed in any public offering memorandum, prospectus or stock exchange listing, circular or announcement without the express and prior written consent of DNV GL.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1999
    Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Annual Report 1998–1999 TM Free, independent, just, informal and speedy resolution of complaints about telecommunications services. TM TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY OMBUDSMAN LTD ACN 057 634 787 TELEPHONE +61 3 8600 8700 FACSIMILE +61 3 8600 8797 FREECALL™ 1800 062 058 FREEFAX™ 1800 630 614 TTY 1800 675 692 TRANSLATOR & INTERPRETER SERVICE 131 450 WEBSITE www.tio.com.au PO BOX 276 COLLINS STREEET WEST, MELBOURNE VICTORIA 8007 AUSTRALIA LEVEL 15, 114 WILLIAM STREET, MELBOURNE VICTORIA 3000 AUSTRALIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY OMBUDSMAN 1998-99 Annual Report CONTENTS 1998-99 AT A GLANCE 2 STATEMENT FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF COUNCIL 4 STATEMENT FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD 6 OMBUDSMAN’S OVERVIEW 8 TIO OPERATIONS 10 COMPLAINT HANDLING 16 TELEPHONE SERVICE INVESTIGATION ISSUES 20 INTERNET SERVICE INVESTIGATION ISSUES 32 PROFILE OF COMPLAINANTS 36 GLOSSARY 40 MEMBERSHIP LIST 42 DIRECTORS’ REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 50 Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman ANNUAL REPORT 1998-1999 1 1998-99 AT A GLANCE TIO membership increased by 62% to number 866 Total number of complaints increased by 23.5%, numbering 64,394 1998-99 saw a continued rise in the number and complexity of complaints lodged with the TIO. The total number of complaints handled by the TIO increased by 23.5% to 64,394. Because some cases include more than one issue, a total of 67,023 issues were raised by complainants. The continued increase in complaint Total number of complaints numbers is mostly due to greater public An increase of 23.5% over the awareness of the TIO, compensation previous year, includes 10,258 available under the Customer Service non-allocated complaints.
    [Show full text]
  • An Industry Vision for the National Broadband Network Plan
    An Industry Vision for the National Broadband Network Plan Supplementary Report Prepared for the Panel of Experts to assess National Broadband Network proposals and the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy Senator the Hon. Stephen Conroy 30th March 2008 An Industry Vision for the National Broadband Network Plan – Supplementary Report 2 An Industry Vision for the National Broadband Network Plan – Supplementary Report Table of Contents Background ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 4 1. Summary .................................................................................................................................. 5 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 8 3. Common Issues Relating to Brownfield and Greenfield Deployments ............................. 9 3.1 National Network Basic Topology Standard ................................................................ 9 3.2 Central Co-ordination Office ...................................................................................... 10 4. Greenfield Deployments ....................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sophisticated Broadband Services
    Final Report for the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) Sophisticated broadband services 28 November 2005 Our ref.: 307-445 Analysys Consulting Limited St Giles Court, 24 Castle Street Cambridge, CB3 0AJ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 460600 Fax: +44 (0)1223 460866 [email protected] www.analysys.com Sophisticated broadband services Final Report for the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) Contents 0 Executive summary i 0.1 Fixed coverage i 0.2 Mobile coverage iii 0.3 Initial coverage conclusions v 0.4 Initial usage conclusions vi 1 Introduction 1 2 Coverage of sophisticated broadband services – methodology 3 2.1 Technical limitations of DSL technologies 4 2.2 Distribution of line lengths 5 2.3 UK-specific analysis 7 3 Coverage of sophisticated broadband services – results 8 3.1 Interpretation of the results 9 3.2 United Kingdom 10 3.3 Australia 15 3.4 Canada 17 3.5 France 19 3.6 Germany 22 3.7 Ireland 24 3.8 Italy 26 3.9 Japan 29 3.10 South Korea 30 3.11 Sweden 32 3.12 US 34 Sophisticated broadband services 4 Usage of sophisticated broadband services – results 37 4.1 Methodology for business indicators 38 4.2 Methodology for residential indicators 40 4.3 Results for business indicators 42 4.4 Results for residential indicators 50 4.5 Trends analysis articles 57 0 Executive summary This document is the second report of the study commissioned to Analysys by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) to examine the market for sophisticated broadband services across the G7,1 Australia, Ireland, South Korea and Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2000
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY OMBUDSMAN INDUSTRY TELECOMMUNICATIONS Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Annual Report 1999:2000 1999:2000 ANNUAL REPORT 1999:2000 ANNUAL Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Ltd ACN 057 634 787 Telephone +61 3 8600 8700 Facsimile +61 3 8600 8797 Freecall™ 1800 062 058 Freefax™ 1800 630 614 TTY 1800 675 692 Translator & Interpreter Service 131 450 Website www.tio.com.au PO Box 276 Collins Street West, Melbourne Victoria 8007 Australia Level 15, 114 William Street, Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman 3807 TIO 2000.xps 13/7/01 12:50 PM Page 1 Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Annual Report Free, independent, just, informal and speedy resolution of complaints about telecommunications services. Contents 1999–2000 at a Glance 2 Statement from the Chairman of Council 4 Statement from the Chairman of the Board 6 Ombudsman’s Overview 8 TIO Operations 10 Membership 18 Complaint Handling 20 Telephone Service Investigation Issues 26 Internet Service Investigation Issues 39 Profile of Complainants 44 Guide to TIO Statistics 47 Glossary 49 TIO Members 51 Directors’ Report and Financial Statements 57 3807 TIO 2000.xps 13/7/01 12:50 PM Page 2 1999-2000 at a glance 1999-2000 at a glance Complaint Total contacts Complaint breakdown (’000) (percentage) numbers • 67,761 contacts 1994|95 received, a 5.2% increase over the 1995|96 previous year • Total contacts 1996|97 included 13,361 enquiries which did 1997|98 not constitute a complaint, leaving
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2001
    uted call charges Internet access mobile phone contracts debt collection telephone directories Internet bills land access privacy phone cards faults connections cus sfer download speeds customer service guarantee credit control disconnections payment terms web access customer service industry codes standard form of agreem ts of presence payphones dropouts information calls Internet dumping direct debit authority disputed bills number portability mobile phones override codes unaut payphones dropouts information calls Internet dumping direct debit authority disputed bills number portability mobile phones over n provision of service compensation access speeds local calls mobile coverage call itemisation connection fees low-impact mobile facilities connection delays Inte service compensation access speeds local calls mobile coverage call itemisation connection fees low-impact mobile facilities conn racts network faults consumer codes credit management pre-paid mobiles Internet connection speeds long distance calls email misleading advice pre-selection SMS faults consumer codes credit management pre-paid mobiles Internet connection speeds long distance calls email misleading advice uted call charges Internet access mobile phone contracts debt collection telephone directories Internet bills land access privacy phone cards faults connections cus ges Internet access mobile phone contracts debt collection telephone directories Internet bills land access privacy phone cards fault sfer download speeds customer service guarantee credit control disconnections
    [Show full text]
  • Broadband Adoption by Agriculture and Local Government Councils Australia and the USA
    Broadband Adoption by Agriculture and Local Government Councils Australia and the USA A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation and the Australian Local Government Association by Wondu Business and Technology Services August 2004 RIRDC Publication 04/127 RIRDC Project No WHP-7A © 2004 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 1 74151 035 X ISSN 1440-6845 Broadband Adoption by Agriculture and Local Government Councils - Australia and the USA Publication No. 04/127 Project No. WHP-7A The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. Researcher Contact Details Wondu Business & Technology Services Level 31, ABN-AMRO Tower, 88 Phillip Street Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Phone: 61 2 93692735 Fax: 61 2 93692737 Email: [email protected] In submitting this report, the researcher has agreed to RIRDC publishing this material in its edited form. Disclaimer For the past decade there has been significant change in the development of new information and communication technologies and more recently in the adoption of them by users for business and consumer purposes. The report aims to present an accurate picture of the situation and outlook for the adoption of broadband, but in such a fast- changing industry it is important to recognise that data, especially on prices and use of broadband, can quickly become outdated.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Profile | Point Topic Subscribers
    Point Topic Australia Overview Australia 15 Nov 2017 Broadband Competitive Landscape The digital divide caused by the lack of nationwide superfast fixed broadband infrastructure has prompted direct state intervention. With the National Broadband Network (NBN) plan enacted in 2009, the country started investing directly, and heavily, in an open access wholesale network which is fundamentally changing the fixed broadband market. As with many far-reaching and ambitious projects, the implementation of the NBN project is proving complex in every respect. Originally, NBN was to deploy an extensive FTTP network reaching over 90 per cent of Australian premises, with the rest covered by alternative technologies. A change in government, however, brought about a radical redesign in 2013, based on a ‘multi-technology mix’ approach. FTTP infrastructure was drastically reduced to just over a quarter of premises by 2020, with fibre-to-the-node (FTTN), fibre-to-the- building (FTTB) and hybrid fibre coaxial (HFC) networks taking its place. It remains to be seen if any future political change will result in further amendments. Meanwhile, nbn (formerly NBN Co Limited) has been run as a wholly-owned government business enterprise, investing in national infrastructure and operating on a wholesale-only open access basis. Given nbn's current focus on FTTN/VDSL deployment, DSL is set to remain the most common fixed broadband technology in Australia. It accounted for 66 per cent of the country’s fixed broadband connections at the end of 2016, and was followed by cable with a 14 per cent share. Fibre subscriber base grew by 209 per cent in a year to the end of 2016 and accounted for about 18 per cent of all broadband connections.
    [Show full text]
  • Sophisticated Broadband Services Report
    Final Report for the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) Sophisticated broadband services 12 May 2006 Our ref.: 307-165 Analysys Consulting Limited St Giles Court, 24 Castle Street Cambridge, CB3 0AJ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 460600 Fax: +44 (0)1223 460866 [email protected] www.analysys.com Sophisticated broadband services Final Report for the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) Contents 0 Executive summary i 0.1 Fixed coverage i 0.2 Mobile coverage iii 0.3 Initial coverage conclusions v 0.4 Initial usage conclusions vi 1 Introduction 1 2 Coverage of sophisticated broadband services – methodology 3 2.1 Technical limitations of DSL technologies 4 2.2 Distribution of line lengths 5 2.3 UK-specific analysis 7 3 Coverage of sophisticated broadband services – results 8 3.1 Interpretation of the results 9 3.2 United Kingdom 10 3.3 Australia 14 3.4 Canada 17 3.5 France 20 3.6 Germany 23 3.7 Ireland 25 3.8 Italy 28 3.9 Japan 30 3.10 South Korea 32 3.11 Sweden 34 3.12 The USA 36 Sophisticated broadband services 4 Usage of sophisticated broadband services – results 39 4.1 Methodology for business indicators 40 4.2 Methodology for residential indicators 43 4.3 Results for business indicators 45 4.4 Results for residential indicators 55 4.5 Trends analysis articles 62 0 Executive summary This document is the third report of the study commissioned to Analysys by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) to examine the market for sophisticated broadband services across the G7,1 Australia, Ireland, South Korea and Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 the Future
    Chapter 6 The Future Technical developments and convergence 6.1 Telecommunications is an area characterised by rapid technical development and convergence. During the short period that has elapsed since the Committee’s final hearing and the preparation of its report there have been several developments which will significantly change the telecommunications environment in Australia. In particular: • Telstra has announced that new testing showed that transmission limits for ADSL can be increased. Telstra estimated that this will extend ADSL availability to an additional 400,000 telephone services by the end of March 2004. • Telstra announced that it will upgrade its CDMA mobile network to allow access to data services, including the Internet, at speeds of up to 144 kbps. • Telstra signed an agreement which will allow it to develop a nationwide broadband service using two way satellite technology through a Thai owned ipstar satellite. Telstra claims that the new service will be cheaper than its current ADSL network. • Foxtel will upgrade its pay TV service to digital in the first half of 2004 allowing it to offer a greatly expanded range of services. 6.2 The pace of development in telecommunications in the current regulatory environment raises issues about the availability and accessibility of new services. Earlier chapters of this report outline the concerns of people in rural and regional areas that they were being left behind the standard of service enjoyed by urban residents. Similar concerns were expressed by organisations representing people with disabilities. For many people in remote, rural and regional Australia the improvements in ADSL, CDMA and the Foxtel cable service outlined above are meaningless because they do not have access to these services anyway.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE LTD Transition to a National Broadband
    COMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE LTD ® Transition to a National Broadband Network TABLE OF CONTENTS • Transition to a National Broadband Network • Key Issues • Attachment A: Preparing for the Broadband World • Attachment B: Future forums on Fibre, Mobile and Wireless in 2006 • Attachment C: Stage 1 Draft Work Plan for Strategic Transitioning to NGN in 2007 (endorsed by the Department, ACMA, ACCC) • Attachment D: 2007 Roundtables for Technical, operational and commercial issues for migrating to and operating in an FTTN environment Transition to a National Broadband Network It is the right time to focus on the development of an appropriate policy and regulatory framework for the broadband-enabled environment of converged networks. Key issues Communications Alliance’s policy focus document, Preparing for the Broadband World, (attachment A) considers some of the fundamental high-level principles for the development of the convergence framework. these include: - Ubiquity - Access - Technology neutrality - the end user - Competition and innovation - Appropriate regulation - Privacy and Security - Stakeholder collaboration A considerable amount of pro-active work has been undertaken by industry members at Communications Alliance over the last 5 years to prepare for migration to the National Broadband Network, including: Next Generation Network (NGN) Framework Options Group Project 2004 (available on request); Future forums on Fibre, Mobile and Wireless in 2006 (attachment B); Stage 1 Draft Work Plan for Strategic Transitioning to NGN in 2007 (endorsed
    [Show full text]
  • Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts References Committee
    The Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts References Committee The Australian telecommunications network August 2004 © Commonwealth of Australia 2004 ISBN 0 642 71306 5 This document was printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra Committee membership Members: Senator John Cherry (AD, QLD) (Chair from 27.3.03)) Senator John Tierney (LP, NSW) (Deputy Chair) Senator Kate Lundy (ALP, ACT) Senator Sue Mackay (ALP, TAS) Senator Tsebin Tchen (LP, VIC) Senator Penny Wong (ALP, SA) Substitute Members Senator Moore to replace Senator Wong for the inquiry into the Australian telecommunications network Former Members Senator Lyn Allison (AD, VIC) (Chair from 14.2.02 to 27.3.03) Participating Members: Senator the Hon Eric Abetz (LP, TAS) Senator Lyn Allison (AD, VIC) Senator the Hon Nick Bolkus (ALP, SA) Senator the Hon Ron Boswell (NPA, QLD) Senator Bob Brown (AG, TAS) Senator Geoffrey Buckland (ALP, SA) Senator George Campbell (ALP, NSW) Senator Kim Carr (ALP, VIC) Senator Grant Chapman (LP, SA) Senator Stephen Conroy (ALP, VIC) Senator the Hon Helen Coonan (LP, NSW) Senator Alan Eggleston, (LP, WA) Senator Christopher Evans (ALP, WA) Senator the Hon. John Faulkner (ALP, NSW) Senator Alan Ferguson (LP, SA) Senator Jeannie Ferris (LP, SA) Senator Brian Greig (AD, WA) for information technology portfolio Senator Brian Harradine (IND, TAS) Senator Leonard Harris (PHON, QLD) Senator Gary Humphries (LP, ACT) Senator Susan Knowles (LP, WA) Senator Meg Lees (AD, SA) Senator Brett Mason (LP, QLD) Senator
    [Show full text]