CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE November 8

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE November 8 November 8, 2005 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE 25329 of torture, and they ought to take the percent, a sizable feat; we had unem- this Nation a shining light of freedom high road in bringing our troops home ployment before Katrina go to 4.9 per- without secret, black ops demanded by from Iraq and returning Iraq to the cent, one of the lowest percentages on someone who was never elected Presi- Iraqi people. record, and even in the last quarter, dent. The Bush administration can never with the incredible natural disaster Throughout our history, Presidents take back the many mistakes that that we faced in the gulf coast and in have led this Nation through wars at have been made over the past several Florida, we had a remarkable 3.8 per- home and abroad by remaining true to years: A failed war in Iraq, heinous cent economic growth. They do not America’s principles and values. In the acts of torture around the world, and a want to talk about the jobs that have mid-19th century, America had never shamefully cynical foreign policy that been created under this policy. before faced a more ferocious enemy has put Americans at greater risk than So we do have a plan. We have a plan than the one from within that reduced ever before. this week or soon to reduce some us to the Civil War. President Lincoln But we are at another crossroads, and spending. We have balanced the budget never lost sight of what we were fight- it is not too late to take the right path. before; we can do it again. We can ing for. He said: ‘‘Our defense is in the If we do not, we risk suffering another bring about the reforms, and some of preservation of the spirit which prizes Yogi Berra prophecy: ‘‘De´ja´ vu all over those are tough reforms, but we have a liberty as a heritage of all men in all again.’’ plan. It involves reform, and it will re- lands everywhere. Destroy this spirit, f sult in savings and we will see contin- and you have planted the seeds of des- ued growth, economic growth in this potism around your own doors.’’ REPUBLICANS HAVE A PLAN country, and fulfill the dreams of In the early 20th century, America Mr. MICA. Mr. Speaker, I ask unani- Americans who want better jobs, who had never before faced a ferocious foe mous consent to have 5 minutes in want lower taxes, less government reg- like the one that plunged the whole place of the gentleman from North ulation, and less litigation. All of those world into war, but President Woodrow Carolina. things, higher taxes, more government Wilson did not forget what America The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there regulation, and litigation, we know stood for. He said: ‘‘The present and all objection to the request of the gen- drive jobs and opportunity out of this that it holds belongs to the nations and tleman from Florida? great Nation. the peoples who preserve their self-con- There was no objection. So Republicans have a plan. We will trol and the orderly processes of gov- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a make reforms. They will result in sav- ernments; the future to those who previous order of the House, the gen- ings and better opportunities for all prove themselves the true friends of tleman from Florida (Mr. MICA) is rec- Americans as opposed to the rhetoric mankind.’’ ognized for 5 minutes. that we have had here on the floor this In the mid-20th century, America had Mr. MICA. Mr. Speaker, I did not afternoon. So I am pleased to present never before faced an enemy more like plan to use these 5 minutes; but as we those items to the House in response to one that had plunged us again into a hear Bush-bashing and bashing of the the rhetoric we have heard. world war, but Franklin Delano Roo- Republicans as you walk through the f sevelt never wavered in his defense of Halls of our Chambers here, I think it his country: ‘‘The only thing we have is appropriate that we do take a ONE NATION—TWO PRESIDENTS to fear is fear itself.’’ minute to respond. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a And with the world on the brink of We just heard more Bush-bashing previous order of the House, the gen- nuclear terror during the Cuban Mis- about accusations of torture in Iraq. I tleman from Washington (Mr. sile Crisis, John Kennedy kept America wonder where some of these same peo- MCDERMOTT) is recognized for 5 min- free and safe without subverting Amer- ple were when Abu Ghraib prison had utes. ican values. JFK knew a lot about win- the torture of thousands of innocent Mr. MCDERMOTT. Mr. Speaker, ning a war without losing the peace. He Iraqi civilians and other people in that across the country today, Americans said: ‘‘When at least at some future society who had their limbs lopped off, are going to the polls to vote for can- date the high court of history sits in who were taken to the precipice out- didates and issues. A year ago, the judgment on each one of us, our suc- side of the prison and lined up, to deal Americans went to the polls and voted cess or failure in whatever office we with prison-crowding. A former Iraqi for a President, but they got two in- may hold will be measured by the an- prisoner told some of us Members of stead. We have George W. Bush, the swers to four questions: Were we truly Congress they would line up the pris- President of domestic policy, like ap- men,’’ and I would add women, ‘‘of oners and then shoot them in front of a pointing a self-described fashion God courage, men and women of judgment, ditch and then bury them. One escaped who left the gulf coast unprotected; men and women of integrity? Were we who had been shot several times and he and we have DICK CHENEY, the Presi- truly men and women of dedication?’’ told us that story. dent of foreign policy, including secret Presidents Lincoln, Wilson, Roo- The Bush administration has wanted CIA presence around the world. sevelt, and Kennedy knew a thing to stop the torture of people in that Now, today the President of foreign about freedom and liberty; and they prison and the loss of life in that coun- policy is trying to round up votes in knew a lot about America. We are the try. They do not want to talk about the Senate to exempt the CIA from an land of the free and not the home of the 300,000 mass graves that we have amendment that would ban the torture the afraid. But the President of foreign uncovered in that country, the slaugh- and inhumane treatment of prisoners. policy would have it otherwise. His de- ter of his own people that Saddam Hus- It is a sure sign that America has lost mands for black ops is a black eye on sein conducted. its way when we even have to talk this Nation. American history, not the Then we heard the previous speaker about banning torture and inhumane unelected President of foreign policy, talk about how bad things are in Amer- treatment of prisoners. should be our guide. ica under the Bush administration and America has never had two Presi- Great American Presidents have led Bush policy. They did not tell us that dents until now, and America has never this Nation in times no less frightening under the policy of President Bush we had a question about its moral integ- than today. Ask any veteran of the have actually, in just this last fiscal rity, until now. The President of for- Second World War what was at stake. year that ended the end of September, eign policy would have us believe that They called it a world war for a reason. we have $100 billion in additional rev- we must become the enemy to defeat They did not shrink from their duty, enue into the United States Treasury. the enemy. Like so much from this ad- and we must not forget that we did our That is a plan of failure? In one year ministration, this is not true. Amer- best and we are the best hope of this we have reduced the deficit, the pro- ica’s moral imperative is true enough, world. We keep America free without jected deficit a year ago by some 25 strong enough, and safe enough to keep losing America’s moral integrity. VerDate Sep 11 2014 08:23 Mar 02, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 0687 Sfmt 0634 E:\FDSYS\2005BOUNDRECORD\BOOK19\NO-SSN\BR08NO05.DAT BR08NO05 ejoyner on DSK30MW082PROD with CONG-REC-ONLINE 25330 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE November 8, 2005 The unelected President of foreign ters knows that the Counterproliferation Di- Thousands have mobility issues and policy wants an exemption on an vision is part of the Directorate of Oper- are without housing because they can- amendment that would ban torture and ations—the covert side of the CIA, where not get up and down the stairs to their most everything and everyone are classified. inhumane treatment of prisoners. He If Fitzgerald were successful in flipping apartment. The list goes on and on, wants the CIA to be free to do what- Libby—and that seems pretty clearly to be and it is truly heart wrenching.
Recommended publications
  • Personal Liability As Administrative Law
    Personal Liability as Administrative Law David Zaring* Abstract Administrative law has almost exclusively concerned itself with lawsuits against agencies as collective entities, under the auspices of the Administrative Procedure Act. In light of the growing number and prominence of suits by war on terror plaintiffs against senior government officials, this Article considers the use of personal liability to discipline government officials and assesses it as an alternative to traditional administrative law. It compares the civil suits to criminal prosecutions of these officials and compares both of them to less- obviously law related scandal campaigns. Personal sanctions—of which Bivens complaints are a principal example—are worth more attention. These mechanisms, and the constitutional tort in particular, are case studies of the popular inclination to decentralize government, of the value of symbolic laws, and, increasingly, of the personalization of law and politics. Solving some of the problems of personal liability, as it works today, might best be done not by enhancing the bite of the always-challenged lawsuits and prosecutions, but by making sure that the law makes it more possible for political cases to be made against government officials, rather than legal ones. Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................................................................. 314 II. Three Kinds of Bivens Actions ..................................................... 319 A. The Doctrinal Problems for Plaintiffs ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Confidentiality Complications
    Confidentiality Complications: How new rules, technologies and corporate practices affect the reporter’s privilege and further demonstrate the need for a federal shield law The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press June 2007 Lucy A. Dalglish, Esq. Gregg P. Leslie, Esq. Elizabeth J. Soja, Esq. 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 Arlington, Virginia 22209 (703) 807-2100 Executive Summary The corporate structure of the news media has created new obstacles, both financial and practical, for journalists who must keep promises of confidentiality. Information that once existed only in a reporter’s notebook can now be accessed by companies that have obligations not only to their reporters, but to their shareholders, their other employees, and the public. Additionally, in the wake of an unprecedented settlement in the Wen Ho Lee Privacy Act case, parties can target news media corporations not just for their access to a reporter’s information, but also for their deep pockets. The potential for conflicts of interest is staggering, but the primary concerns of The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press are that: • because of the 21st-century newsroom’s reliance on technology, corporations now have access to notes, correspondence and work-product information that before only existed in a reporter’s notebook; • the new federal “e-discovery” court rules allow litigants to discover vastly more information than a printed page – or even a saved e-mail – would provide during litigation; • while reporters generally only have responsibilities to themselves,
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday We Mentioned Briefly the Alleged Iraq-Niger Deal Concerning
    Tuesday we mentioned briefly the alleged Iraq-Niger deal concerning shipping Iraq 500 tons of yellowcake {lightly enriched uranium oxide ore}, referenced to British sources in George Bush's State of the Union Speech, January, 2003. The story is murky and convoluted. Here are highlights: The Intelligence Community failed to authenticate in a timely fashion transparently forged documents purporting to show that Iraq had attempted to procure uranium from Niger. Finding 4: Robb-Silberman Report, 2004, "The Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction." • A small Iraqi delegation visits Niger in 1999, reportedly for "expanding commercial relations" and other matters. • In late 2001, early 2002, three reports from a foreign liaison service state that an agreement was signed between Iraq and Niger to deliver 500 tons of yellowcake to Iraq. Intelligence analysts in the Dept. of State and some in CIA question the reliability of the source. The original documents, including a copy of the presumed agreement, is not received at this time. • Niger is an important producer of yellowcake; the mining operation is a consortium of nations, controlled by France. • The reporting of this proposed deal is included in a CIA briefing of Vice President Cheney in early 2002; he expresses interest in the report which originated with the DIA. CIA officials are skeptical, but decide to sent Ambassador Joseph Wilson, whose wife works undercover for CIA, to Niger to investigate the report. Wilson previously served in Niger and other African countries and has good contacts there. The CIA does not have a station in Niger.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 113 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 113 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 160 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 29, 2014 No. 82 Senate The Senate was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Friday, May 30, 2014, at 2 p.m. House of Representatives THURSDAY, MAY 29, 2014 The House met at 10 a.m. and was ment that my colleagues and I were proach me at Memorial Day events to called to order by the Speaker pro tem- prevented from offering an amendment say that they agree that Afghanistan is pore (Mr. BENTIVOLIO). to the NDAA dealing with the constitu- not worth the blood that has been shed f tional responsibility of Congress to de- there. Furthermore, they agreed with clare war. me that Afghanistan is not worth DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO Like many Members of Congress, I America continuing to borrow money TEMPORE had the opportunity to speak at events from foreign nations, driving up fur- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- on Saturday, Sunday, and Monday on ther the debt of our Nation to fund fore the House the following commu- Memorial Day weekend. Every time I President Karzai’s corrupt government nication from the Speaker: spoke, I mentioned my frustration that when we have a multitude of problems WASHINGTON, DC, the McGovern-Jones amendment was and needs right here in America. May 29, 2014. not able to be brought to the floor for Mr. Speaker, I would like to close my I hereby appoint the Honorable KERRY L.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Game: How a Top Spy Was Betrayed by Her Own Government Free
    FREE FAIR GAME: HOW A TOP SPY WAS BETRAYED BY HER OWN GOVERNMENT PDF Valerie Plame Wilson | 412 pages | 10 Jun 2008 | SIMON & SCHUSTER | 9781416537625 | English | New York, NY, United States Fair Game : How a Top CIA Agent Was Betrayed by Her Own Government, Paperback | eBay Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Laura Rozen Afterword. Get A Copy. More Details Edition Language. Other Editions 1. Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Fair Gameplease sign up. Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 3. Rating details. More filters. Sort order. The book itself is well done and a worthy read. However, I gave the book five stars due to its importance both when it was Fair Game: How a Top Spy Was Betrayed by Her Own Government and now The behavior of the George W. Bush administration with regard to Iraq was shameful at many levels, clearly illegal, and undoubtedly immoral. Among other things this Fair Game: How a Top Spy Was Betrayed by Her Own Government helps the reader to realize, Fair Game: How a Top Spy Was Betrayed by Her Own Government total lie about the WMD that Iraq was alleged to have.
    [Show full text]
  • The Culture of Leaks Has to Change, but at What Expense to Congressional Oversight of the Executive Branch?
    SESSA_THE CULTURE OF LEAKS HAS TO CHANGE.DOCX 6/2/2014 5:00 PM “The culture of leaks has to change”1, but at what expense to congressional oversight of the Executive Branch? An examination of Title V. of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. Roseanne Sessa INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 236 I: INTELLIGENCE LEAKS AND CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT WITH RESPECT TO THE MEDIA......................................... 237 A. Unauthorized and Authorized Disclosures .............. 237 B. Congressional Oversight of the Executive Branch .. 239 C. Increase in Executive Power and Privilege Since September 11th ......................................................... 241 D. Historical National Security Leaks in the Media .... 242 E. Recent National Security Leaks in the Media ......... 244 II: THE INTELLIGENCE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 ....................................................................... 246 A. History and Purpose of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 .................. 246 B. Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 .......................................................................... 247 C. § 505: Prohibition on Certain Individuals Serving as Consultants ......................................................... 248 D. § 506: Limitation on Persons Authorized to Communicate With the Media ................................ 248 III: CRITICISM AND RESPONSE .................................................. 249 A. Journalists
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence Information and Judicial Evidentiary Standards
    811 INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION AND JUDICIAL EVIDENTIARY STANDARDS ROBERT BEJESKYt I. INTRODUCTION................................... 811 II. FACT FINDERS .................................... 813 III. NUCLEAR CAPABILITY ........................... 820 IV. BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS........................... 836 V. CHEMICAL WEAPONS ............................ 845 VI. DELIVERY SYSTEMS .............................. 851 VII. M ENS REA ......................................... 854 VIII. INVOLVEMENT WITH TERRORISM ............... 855 IX. CONCLUSION ..................................... 875 I. INTRODUCTION Senator Kennedy called it "reprehensible" that the "administra- tion distorted, misrepresented and manipulated the intelligence" on Iraq.' Louis Fisher wrote: "There should be no question that the pre- war information was distorted, hyped, and fabricated. The October 2002 [National Intelligence Estimate ("NIE")] prepared by the intelli- gence community is plain evidence of that . ."2 University of Pitts- burgh President Jem Spectar contended that the "Bush administration exploited, furthered, manipulated or thrived on the public's confusion .... "3 Professor Yamamoto explained, "Many have documented this ad- ministration's penchant for deliberate misrepresentations on national security-in blunt terms, [and] for lying to the American people about threats at home and abroad."4 Harvard Emeritus Professor Stanley t MA Political Science (Michigan), MA Applied Economics (Michigan), LL.M. In- ternational Law (Georgetown). The author has taught courses in International Law at Cooley Law School and for the Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan, courses in American Government and Constitutional Law at Alma College, and courses in Business Law at Central Michigan University and the University of Miami. 1. J M Spectar, Beyond the Rubicon: PresidentialLeadership, InternationalLaw & The Use of Force in the Long Hard Slog, 22 CoN. J. Irr'iL L. 47, 90 (2006). 2. Louis Fisher, Lost ConstitutionalMoorings: Recovering the War Power, 81 IND.
    [Show full text]
  • This Week in History
    This Week in History 2005 September 29 | Judith Miller Released from Jail New York Times reporter Judith Miller is released from federal prison after agreeing to reveal her source in the Valerie Plame Affair. Robert Novak outs Valerie Plame as a CIA officer in a newspaper op-ed, but investigators believe Judith Miller has knowledge of the leaker and incarcerate her for refusing to cooperate. In 2008, Robert Novak is a guest of the Club, speaking at a Public Affairs luncheon on politics and his autobiography, The Prince of Darkness. 1890 October 1 | Yosemite National Park Created Through legislation, Congress creates Yosemite National Park, which is signed into law by honorary Club member and United States President Benjamin Harrison. Earlier in 1864, President Abraham Lincoln declared Yosemite Valley a public trust of California marking the first time the federal government conserved land for public recreational use. 1961 October 1 | Roger Maris’ Home Run Record Roger Maris hits his 61st home run in the fourth inning of the season’s final game to establish a Major League record at Yankee Stadium. Maris’ 61st home run breaks Babe Ruth’s 1927 single-season record of 60 home runs. 1863 October 3 | Thanksgiving Day Proclamation President Abraham Lincoln issues his Thanksgiving Day Proclamation, calling on Americans “in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next as a day of thanksgiving”. 1822 October 4 | Rutherford B. Hayes Born United States President Rutherford B.
    [Show full text]
  • ADMINISTRATION Key Bush Intelligence Briefing Kept from Hill Panel
    ADMINISTRATION Key Bush Intelligence Briefing Kept From Hill Panel By Murray Waas, special to National Journal © National Journal Group Inc. Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2005 Ten days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush was told in a highly classified briefing that the U.S. intelligence community had no evidence linking the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein to the attacks and that there was scant credible evidence that Iraq had any significant collaborative ties with Al Qaeda, according to government records and current and former officials with firsthand knowledge of the matter. The information was provided to Bush on September 21, 2001 during the "President's Daily Brief," a 30- to 45-minute early-morning national security briefing. Information for PDBs has routinely been derived from electronic intercepts, human agents, and reports from foreign intelligence services, as well as more mundane sources such as news reports and public statements by foreign leaders. One of the more intriguing things that Bush was told during the briefing was that the few credible reports of contacts between Iraq and Al Qaeda involved attempts by Saddam Hussein to monitor the terrorist group. Saddam viewed Al Qaeda as well as other theocratic radical Islamist organizations as a potential threat to his secular regime. At one point, analysts believed, Saddam considered infiltrating the ranks of Al Qaeda with Iraqi nationals or even Iraqi intelligence operatives to learn more about its inner workings, according to records and sources. The September 21, 2001, briefing was prepared at the request of the president, who was eager in the days following the terrorist attacks to learn all that he could about any possible connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump-Russia Investigations: a Guide
    TRUMP-RUSSIA INVESTIGATIONS: A GUIDE Faiza Patel, Rachel Levinson-Waldman, Douglas Keith, and Harsha Panduranga THE ISLAMOPHOBIC ADMINISTRATION | 1 Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is a nonpartisan law and policy institute that seeks to improve our systems of democracy and justice. We work to hold our political institutions and laws accountable to the twin American ideals of democracy and equal justice for all. The Center’s work ranges from voting rights to campaign finance reform, from ending mass incarceration to preserving Constitutional protection in the fight against terrorism. Part think tank, part advocacy group, part cutting-edge communications hub, we start with rigorous research. We craft innovative policies. And we fight for them — in Congress and the states, the courts, and in the court of public opinion. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S LIBERTY AND NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAM The Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program works to advance effective national security policies that respect constitutional values and the rule of law, using innovative policy recommendations, litigation, and public advocacy. The program focuses on reining in excessive government secrecy; ensuring that counterterrorism authorities are narrowly targeted to the terrorist threat; and securing adequate oversight and accountability mechanisms. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S PUBLICATIONS Red cover | Research reports offer in-depth empirical findings. Blue cover | Policy proposals offer innovative, concrete reform solutions. White cover | White papers offer a compelling analysis of a pressing legal or policy issue. © 2017. This paper is covered by the Creative Commons “Attribution-No Derivs-NonCommercial” license (see http:// creativecommons.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Battle to Save Children from Gang Terror
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Lashmar, P. (2008). From shadow boxing to Ghost Plane: English journalism and the War on Terror. In: Investigative Journalism. (pp. 191-214). Abingdon, UK: Routledge. ISBN 9780415441445 This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/19055/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203895672 Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] From shadow boxing to Ghost Plane: English journalism and the War on Terror In my career as a journalist, there has never been a war on terror but a war of terror. John Pilger.1 “In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible….This political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness. Defenceless villages are bombed from the air, the inhabitants driven out into the countryside, the cattle machine gunned, the huts set on fire with incendiary bullets: this is called pacification.
    [Show full text]
  • Anonymous Sources: a Utilitarian Exploration of Their Justification and Guidelines for Limited Use
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Communication Faculty Publications Department of Communication 2011 Anonymous Sources: A Utilitarian Exploration of Their Justification and Guidelines for Limited Use Matt J. Duffy [email protected] Carrie Packwood Freeman Georgia State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/communication_facpub Part of the Journalism Studies Commons Recommended Citation Duffy, M. J., & Freeman, C. P. (2011). Anonymous sources: A utilitarian exploration of their justification and guidelines for limited use. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 26(4), 297-315. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Communication at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Unnamed sources: A utilitarian exploration Page 1 A similar version of this paper was later published as: Duffy, M. J. & Freeman, C. P. (2011). Anonymous Sources: A Utilitarian Exploration of Their Justification and Guidelines for Limited Use, Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 26(4), 297-315. Unnamed Sources: A utilitarian exploration of their justification and guidelines for limited use By Matt J Duffy, PhD & Carrie Packwood Freeman, PhD Unnamed sources: A utilitarian exploration Page 2 Abstract This article critically examines the practice of unnamed sourcing in journalism. A literature review highlights arguments in favor of and against their use. Then, the authors examine some common examples of anonymous sourcing using the lens of utilitarianism, the ethical model commonly used to justify the practice.
    [Show full text]