DOCSLIB.ORG

Cheshire's Children

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cheshire's Children Cheshire’s Children & Plan Young People’s 2008-2011 Building a brighter future Contents Foreword 4 Section 3 ‘Integration and System Change’ Executive Summary 6 Workforce Development and Reform 61 Joined Up Responses and Processes including Introduction: Common Assessment and ContactPoint 63 The Children’s Trust – Voluntary Community and Faith Sector Development 64 Arrangements for Co-operation, Principles and Priorities 8 Children’s Centres, Schools and Extended Services 65 Cheshire is Changing 10 Developing a joint approach to Commissioning 66 Our Drivers for Change 12 Resources 15 Section 4 ‘Targets and Managing Performance’ Target setting and Performance Management/Reporting 67 Section 1 ‘Introducing our Children Young People and Families’ Acknowledgements Summary of Information about our Children and Young People’s Views and Needs 16 Section 5 ‘Appendices’ Appendix 1 The Cheshire Children and Young People’s Trust 68 Section 2 ‘Our Priorities for Action’ 24 Appendix 2 Mandatory Children’s Plan Requirements 70 Be Healthy 26 Appendix 3 Cheshire Index of Multiple Deprivation 72 Stay Safe 31 Appendix 4 Glossary 74 Enjoy and Achieve 39 Appendix 5 Cheshire Children’s LAA 75 Make a Positive Contribution 47 Achieve Economic Wellbeing 53 Further information For more copies of the Plan or information on any aspect of the contents please contact Rick Howell – 01244 973228 or [email protected] Foreword 156,000 children and young people are growing up in Cheshire, and as Chair of the Cheshire Children and Young People’s Trust (CCYPT) and the Director of Children’s Services, I am proud to introduce this new Plan for them. Joan Feenan In developing this Plan, children and Our existing Children and Young our duty to stay focused on retaining Cheshire County Council young people of all ages have expressed People’s Plan originally spanned a and improving good services and Director of Children’s Services views on what is important to them three-year period until 2009. However, outcomes for our children and young now and in the future. For a great many the now fully established Cheshire people. Within this Plan the Trust has it is simple aspirations for good health, Children and Young People’s Trust saw set out to highlight the needs of our safety, happiness and a promising the development of a new Plan as an most disadvantaged and vulnerable future. Stopping bullying, safe places to important way of marking their children particularly those who are in play and having a real say in decision- commitments and affirming priorities. care or may be most at risk of poor making were also consistently outcomes. The Children’s Trust now comprises important. When we asked them what representatives of all those that have The changes in Local Government they wanted to see changed, the view significant commissioning and delivery do make this a transitional Plan, it the media presents of children and responsibilities for services in Cheshire. offers a blueprint for some of the big young people was high on their list – This Plan, more than any before it, can organisational and process changes, but they want a more positive and balanced say it is a statement of joint shared also seeks to sustain the momentum of representation of all the great things intentions with resonance for everyone change and improvement that has seen that they do. Additionally children, that works with or for children, young many of our children and young people young people and their parents have people and their families. achieving better outcomes and many of told us that they are often frustrated our services recognised nationally and about how organisations don’t work As Local Government in Cheshire regionally for their strong performance. together and that support, information goes through a major change further or advice was either difficult to get or significance is given to this Plan. This is a Plan that sets challenging came too late. We want to respond to On the 1st April 2009 the existing 7 local outcome and improvement targets for these views positively and our Plan Authorities in Cheshire will cease and the next 12 months and alongside that goes some way to addressing their two new Authorities for East and West a joint direction of travel for ‘all’ services concerns and challenges to us. Cheshire will be formed. The Trust has to children and young people for the been explicit that during such next 2-5 years. organisational and political change it is 4 Cheshire Children & Young People’s Trust The commitment: “We believe that all children and young people have the right to be healthy, happy, and safe; to be loved, valued and respected; and to have high aspirations for their future…” Executive Summary – Our vision and commitment We want Cheshire to be a great place for children, young people and their families to live and grow up in – this Plan sets out the collective contribution of the Cheshire Children and Young People’s Trust to achieving that and the commitment shown on page 5: Achieving our vision To achieve this vision, we need to For children that are ‘looked after’ A system will be put in place for the do things differently and this Plan the gap is most stark. next 12 months to make sure that sets out some of the things that we There is recognition in the Plan commitments are carried out and that intend to develop and change. that children and young people our work is having the intended There is not a single solution to need different responses at different impact; many of the targets in this improving outcomes. The actions stages in their lives but wherever Plan will also become parts of other covered are targeted at the different possible the aim has to be to get plans and the majority will need to needs and circumstances of help and support before problems be agreed with Government. children, young people and families; or risks become very established importantly they also focus on how Working together and complex. To date we have we organise our services. The combined spend of those that been quite rigid about how and are represented on the Trust is over Our information is telling us where people can access help: £850 million; this Plan should that while the majority of Cheshire’s this Plan takes a fresh look at where ensure that it is better and more children and young people are support and services are provided effectively spent. At a minimum the doing very well and have improving and proposes new ways of making combined resources of the Trust prospects, a significant number, services and processes simpler and members need to align significantly often living in the most nearer to home. There is particularly against the priorities that they have disadvantaged parts of Cheshire, a changing role for schools, to agreed will have the most impact on are not. Prospects for many of these become more at the centre of their improving outcomes. children and young people, while communities with more effective improving, are not increasing as fast links between them and other The table overleaf sets out the as those for their peers – therefore, children’s services, so that together principal priorities for Cheshire and in spite of improvements, the gap is they can engage parents and tackle those indicators that will form the widening between those with the the barriers to the learning, health basis for the 08/09 Local Area best and poorest outcomes. and happiness of every child. Agreement. Cheshire Children & Young People’s Trust Children’s Trust Priorities Summary Outcome Area Be Healthy Stay Safe Enjoy and Achieve Make a positive Achieve Economic Management Contribution Wellbeing and Process Cross Cutting A) Improving attainment in children and families from low income backgrounds Focus B) Tackling the adverse impact of alcohol on poor outcomes for children and their families Outcome and Teenage pregnancy Reducing levels of Raising achievement Young people’s Full entitlement Workforce Development and sexual health neglect in targeted groups, involvement in to education and development schools and positive activities curriculum – targeting and reform communities and participation as vulnerable young influencers and people decision makers Stopping the rise in Tackling bullying Increasing all children Increasing pro Tackling worklessness Joined up childhood obesity and young people’s social behaviour: in families where there responses opportunities to ensuring children are children including participate in physical and young people processes e.g. and creative activities stay out of trouble CAF and outside school ContactPoint Good mental health Positive choices; Improve Opportunities Reducing Alcohol, Employers’ Voluntary and emotional children, young and Outcomes for Smoking and engagement and Community and wellbeing people and parents Children with Substance use/ support for 14-19 faith Sector stay safe and disabilities misuse developments Development manage risk better. Placement stability Improve Value-Added / Support homeless and Children’s for Looked After progress in all Key vulnerable young Centres and Children Stages people Extended Services Supporting children Excellent Information, Commissioning exposed to domestic Advice and Guidance development abuse Cheshire LAA 1) Obesity in primary school age children in Year 6 2) Young people’s participation in positive activities Targets 3) First time entrants to the Youth Justice System aged 10–17 4) Substance misuse by young people 5) 16 to 18 year olds who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) 6) Under 18 conception rate Cheshire Children & Young People’s Trust 7 Introduction This Cheshire Children and Young People’s Plan is presented on behalf of Cheshire’s Children and Young People’s Trust (CCYPT). The Trust is a broad coalition of all 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Schedule of Sites
    OVERLEIGH WARD Site Ref Address/Location Yield Yield Site Area (ha) Total Potential Total OVE0001 5 Dingle Bank (land adjacent), Chester 0.48 5 OVE0002 Mount Pleasant (land at), Curzon Park 2.159 40 OVE0003 Lache Lane / Winkwell Drive (land to the rear), Westminster Park 1.076 30 OVE0004 Green Bank, West Cheshire College 0.87 27 OVE0005 Great Western House, The Sidings, Chester St, Saltney, CH4 8RD 0.56 18 OVE0006 Red Hill House, Hope Street, Saltney 0.99 31 OVE0007 Lapper Field, off Barwoods Drive 8.11 227 OVE0008 Styelane Croft (land at), Handbridge 0.96 30 OVE0009 3 Lache Lane, Chester CH4 7LP 0.43 3 OVE0010 52 - 54 Hough Green (Formerly The Curzon Hotel), Chester 0.19 6 OVE0011 64 Hough Green (Formerly The Redland Hotel), Chester CH4 8JW 0.11 2 OVE0012 40 Hough Green (Former Youth Hostel), Chester CH4 8JQ 0.2 11 OVE0013 40 Curzon Park North, Chester CH4 8AR 0.32 1 OVE0014 22 - 26 Handbridge, Chester CH4 7JE 0.03 2 OVE0015 53 - 59 Circular Drive, Lache, Chester 0.156 4 OVE0016 32 - 34 Oldfield Crescent, Chester CH4 7PE 0.08 1 OVE0017 31 - 37 Fairford Road (land between), Lache 0.03 2 OVE0018 34-51 Fairford Road land between), Lache 0.03 2 OVE0019 Newbury Road (land between no 7 - 9), Lache 0.04 3 TOTAL = 16.821 445 Cheshire West and Chester SHLAA: 2010 Schedule of sites Site Details Site Ref: OVE0001 Address/ 5 Dingle Bank (land adjacent), Chester Planning Status None/Other Location Site Area (Ha) 0.48 Ward Overleigh Source: Historic SHLAA Potential Yield 5 Ownership Density (per Ha) 35 Site Summary Key Site Characteristics Site Type Greenfield Garden adjacent to detached dwelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Year Review Elcome to This Festive Edition of Alert
    December 2009 Keeping Cheshire Fire and Rescue Service Personnel Informed Year Review elcome to this festive edition of Alert. July saw crews dealing with a The past year has been one of major major explosion at flats in Hoole Wchange for the organisation, yet we have Lane, Chester – miraculously there still managed to deliver an excellent service to were no injuries. The month was local communities and hit our key targets. A also a time for departures, with fire sincere thank you to all staff and volunteers for cadets making their third successful your hard work and commitment - Happy school-building visit to Ghana and Kathryn Christmas and a peaceful New Year. Foreman, Deputy Chief Fire Officer for Paul Hancock, Chief Fire Officer Corporate Services saying farewell. David Topping, Chair of the Fire Authority August saw the Service taking pride The year started with the Service highlighted as of place with its pink fire appliance at one of the most progressive in the country in a Manchester’s massive Pride Parade. national report called ‘Rising to the Challenge: The stars were out in September at improving fire service efficiency’. the Service’s inaugural STAR awards February saw the launch of a new stores service event which ensured many of the from HQ following a major £30,000 refit. organisation’s ‘stars’ were recognised. Improvements included better computer access, There was another first with the launch of improved storage and stock management. the Co-Responder scheme at Nantwich. March saw celebrations as the Service hit its October was another time for target of carrying out 60,000 HSAs.
    [Show full text]
  • WP News Westminster Park Residents’ Association
    December 2019 WP News Westminster Park Residents’ Association Sunset over Bringing our community alive Westminster Park www.wp-ra.org.uk @wesparkra Residents show care for our community obstruction, please think of others and trim it https://westcheshireyourstreets.co.uk/ back. Some residents may find this physically Fly-tipping has been noted by the bottle challenging, and people at the meeting banks on the shop car park – if you witness it, suggested that we could all be good please report it. neighbours and offer to help others. Speeding and inconsiderate parking, The idea of turning some of the larger particularly near the school, were also hot grassed areas on Westminster Park into topics at our meeting. Nobody wants to see wildflower meadows was very popular and we children involved in an accident, so please are hoping to work with the Council to bring ensure that you park with care around the this about over the next couple of years. school/shops area. PCSO Lauren Davies has The Council has started a new ‘Love Your recently visited the school to highlight this Caring for and enhancing our area, one of issue. There were calls for a zebra crossing the main objectives of your residents’ or lollipop person and Councillor Neil Sullivan association, was discussed at our recent agreed to pursue these suggestions with public meeting. Much is already happening – Council officers. last month we planted more bulbs for a great If you have any other ideas about how we spring display. Crocuses have gone in by the can improve our local area, please email me shops and daffodils around the junctions of at [email protected] or ring 07752 854383.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Full Report Here
    1 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the LSE Housing and Communities Research Team in the Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE) at the London School of Economics (LSE), LSE. Thanks to Ceris Anderson and Jane Ashworth from StreetGames for their advice, support and information; also many local stakeholders who provided us with background information and introduced us to their areas – in particular Alex Tate, Sean Daley, Dale Gilmartin, Liz Holding, Geraldine Maddison, Matthew Jacklin, Delroy Hibbert, Andrew Birtwhistle, Harry Jenkinson, Daniel Burford and Jason Turner. We owe special thanks to the 106 young people and parents who shared their experiences. We accept full responsibility for any mistakes, misleading or incomplete information. About LSE Housing and Communities LSE Housing and Communities is a research unit within the Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE) at the London School of Economics led by Professor Anne Power. CASE is a multi-disciplinary research centre which focuses on the exploration of different dimensions of social disadvantage, particularly from longitudinal and neighbourhood perspectives, examining the impact of public policy. We aim to understand the social dynamics of disadvantaged neighbourhoods; promote models of housing and neighbourhood management; develop ways to support community and resident self-help action, especially in social housing areas; and shape government policy. 2 Contents Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1: Applicant Details
    St Martin’s Academy Completed Application Form for North West Academies… Application checklist Checklist: Sections A-H of your application Yes No 1. You have established a company limited by guarantee 2. You have provided information to cover all of the following areas: Section A: Applicant details – including signed declaration Section B: Outline of the school Section C: Education vision Section D: Education plan Section E: Evidence of demand and marketing Section F: Capacity and capability Section G: Initial costs and financial viability Section H: Premises 3. This information is provided in A4 format using Arial font, minimum 12 font size 4. You have completed two financial plans using the financial template spreadsheet 5. Independent schools only: you have provided a link to the NA most recent inspection report 6. Independent schools only: you have provided a copy of the NA last two years’ audited financial statements or equivalent 7. All relevant information relating to Sections A-H of your application has been emailed to [email protected] between 13 and 24 February 2012 8. Two hard copies of the application have been sent by ‘Recorded Signed For’ post to: Free Schools Applications Team, Department for Education, 3rd Floor, Sanctuary Buildings, Great Smith Street, London SW1P 3BT, between 13 and 24 February 2012 Checklist: Section I of your application 9. A copy of Section A of the form and as many copies of the Due Diligence form as there are members and directors have been sent by ‘Recorded Signed For’ post to: Due Diligence Team, Department for Education, 4th Floor, Sanctuary Buildings, Great Smith Street, London SW1P 3BT, between 13 and 24 February 2012 2 Section A: Applicant details Main contact for this application 1 Name: 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Electoral Review of Cheshire West and Chester
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CHESHIRE WEST AND CHESTER Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the borough of Cheshire West and Chester March 2018 Sheet 1 of 1 ANTROBUS CP Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information applied as part of this review. WHITLEY SUTTON CP WEAVER CP This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. NESTON NETHERPOOL R Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. E T The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2018. D S FRODSHAM DUTTON IN MARBURY M CP ASTON CP T E S CP GREAT E W BUDWORTH CP PARKGATE FRODSHAM KEY TO PARISH WARDS NESTON WILLASTON COMBERBACH CP INCE & THORNTON CP LITTLE CP DODLESTON CP C SUTTON LEIGH CP LEDSHAM VILLAGES HELSBY CENTRAL & GRANGE ANDERTON MARSTON & MANOR WINCHAM A DODLESTON HELSBY ACTON WITH CP LITTLE WOLVERHAM CP B LACHE LANE CP BRIDGE CP MARBURY CP NESTON WHITBY ELTON KINGSLEY BARNTON LOSTOCK PARK NESTON CP LEDSHAM LITTLE CP CP CP GRALAM CP CP STANNEY CP Y L NORTHWICH C LITTLE NESTON HITB IL W S -H P WINNINGTON J NORTHWICH WITTON D NESTON VE E C RO H CROWTON & CASTLE G THORNTON-LE-MOORS T D E PARKGATE - R CP WEAVERHAM NORTHWICH NETHER STOAK CP N O ALVANLEY I CAPENHURST -O F CP CP PEOVER CP CP M S CP CP GOWY A P WEAVER & NORTHWICH CP H A G N H CUDDINGTON RUDHEATH PUDDINGTON
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Review Of
    Local Government Boundary Commission for England Review of ward arrangements, Cheshire West and Chester 29 May 2017 I write as the elected Member for Handbridge park ward, first elected in May 2011 and re‐elected in May 2015. I have previously served as Member for Lache ward on Chester city council between May 2007 and May 2009 when the City council disappeared under local government reorganisation. I have also served terms as Governor of Lache primary school between September 2009 and January 2015 and St Clare’s Catholic primary, also in the Lache, between September 2011 and July 2016. I write to support the creation of a new Overleigh ward encompassing the existing Handbridge Park and Lache wards. I also wish to support the inclusion of polling districts JL3 and JE4 in the proposed new ward. The substantive issue of a single 3‐member ward south of the River dee in Chester is compelling. The residents in this area share common services such as schools, medical practices, places of worship and recreation facilities. The Police treat this as a single beat with 1 Constable and 2 PCSOs covering the beat. The local clinical commissioning group is aiming towards a single centrally located GP practice to serve the whole of this area. There is a strong case for multi member wards. In Handbridge Park, which is a 2‐member ward, the workload is shared between the 2 ward councillors and this allows for effective cover when 1 Member is sick or on leave. In the single member Lache ward, many residents have complained about lack of access to their councillor at such times.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Judgment
    Neutral Citation Number: [2007] EWHC 1373 (Ch) Case No: HC06C03700 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL 15/06/2007 Before : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE RIMER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : 1) CHESTER CITY COUNCIL Claimants 2) CHESTER CITY TRANSPORT LIMITED - and - 1) ARRIVA PLC Defendants 2) ARRIVA CYMRU LIMITED 3) ARRIVA NORTH WEST LIMITED - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr Mark Brealey QC and Mr Gerard Rothschild (instructed by DLA Piper UK LLP) for the Claimants Mr Thomas Sharpe QC, Mr Paul Harris and Mr Conall Patton (instructed by Dickinson Dees LLP) for the Defendants Hearing dates: 22, 23, 26, 27, 28 February, 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 22 and 23 March 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. ............................. THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE RIMER MR JUSTICE RIMER : Introduction 1. The claimants are Chester City Council (“the Council”) and Chester City Transport Limited (“CCT”). The Council owns all the issued shares of CCT, a bus company providing services in and around the City of Chester. CCT trades as “ChesterBus”. The defendants are Arriva plc, Arriva Cymru Limited and Arriva North West Limited (“Arriva”). The claimants seek declarations, injunctions and damages founded on their assertion that, in breach of section 18 of the Competition Act 1998, Arriva has abused what is said to be its dominant position in the relevant bus market by threatening predatory behaviour directed at driving CCT out of business.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Report Feb2012
    An interim review into the impact of the Financial Services Sector in West Cheshire and Chester and its immediate sub-region Centre for Labour Market Development University of Chester First published 2011 by the Centre for Labour Market Development University of Chester Parkgate Road Chester CH1 4BJ Printed and bound in the UK by the LIS Print Unit University of Chester Cover designed by the LIS Graphics Team University of Chester © Centre for Labour Market Development, University of Chester, 2011 All Rights Reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission of the copyright owner, other than as permitted by current UK copyright legislation or under the terms and conditions of a recognised copyright licensing scheme A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-1-905929-96-2 This report has been produced by the University of Chester’s Centre for Labour Market Development (CLMD) at the request of Cheshire West and Chester Council. CLMD is a key research centre within the University of Chester’s Faculty of Business Enterprise and Lifelong Learning. The Centre focuses upon developing the knowledge base to support the economic and social capital of the North West. This report has been prepared by Professor Phil Harris, Executive Dean of Business, Enterprise and Lifelong Learning and Westminster Chair of Marketing and Public Affairs Professor Chris Pyke, Associate Dean and Head of Chester Business School and Bank of America Chair of Consumer Financial Services Dr Simon Adderley, Assistant Director of the Centre for Labour Market Development The information and advice within this report has been produced with all reasonable care in respect of accuracy and correctness using nationally recognised sources of statistics and advice from the organisation who commissioned the document.
    [Show full text]
  • Education in England: Progress and Goals’, Centreforum, January 2016
    About the authors Natalie Perera is Executive Director and Head of Research at CentreForum. Her background includes twelve years at the Department for Education (leading on policies including Early Years and school funding) and a period working in the Cabinet Office. Peter Sellen is Chief Economist at CentreForum. Prior to this he worked as an economic adviser at the Department for Education from 2012. Peter’s previous civil service career spanned analytical and policy roles in Defra, the Department for Transport, Communities and Local Government, and HM Treasury. Jo Hutchinson is Associate Director for Education at CentreForum. Her background includes ten years as a statistician at the Department for Education. She also led on evidence for the London Mayor’s Education Inquiry and on international evidence for the National Curriculum Review. Rebecca Johnes is a Research Officer at CentreForum, specialising in Education. Rebecca has taught in schools both in England and Japan. Lance Mao is an analyst and researcher at CentreForum. He studied natural sciences at Selwyn College, Cambridge, specialising in physics. Acknowledgements Mike Treadaway is Director for Research for the Fischer Family Trust (FFT). As a leading national figure in the area of educational research, he is best known for his innovative work in developing data to support target setting and evaluation in schools and local authorities throughout England and Wales. As well as continuing to develop FFT data and undertake research, Mike is also a regular national speaker and trainer, providing advice and support on how data can be most effectively used to challenge, motivate and understand pupils progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire West and Chester Council Submission (PDF)
    Chief Executive's Directorate Cheshire West and Chester Council County Hall, Chester, CH1 1SF Tel: 0300 123 8 123 web: www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk Ms J Metheringham The Boundary Committee for England Trevelyan House Great Peter Street London SW1P 2HW our reference your reference: please ask for: date: ElRev David Owen 12 August 2009 01 01244 975932 david.owen@ cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk Dear Jessica ELECTORAL REVIEW IN CHESHIRE WEST & CHESTER Please find attached, my Council’s proposal for Electoral Arrangements in Cheshire West & Chester. The proposal was made by resolution of the Council at its meeting held on 23 July 2009. The proposal document contains as Appendices, the electoral data proformas which the Boundary Committee requires. Should you require any further information regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely David Owen Policy Manager Electoral Review of Cheshire West & Chester The proposed scheme for new electoral arrangements submitted to the Boundary Committee for England Cheshire West & Chester Council July 2009 CONTENTS Summary 1.0 Introduction to the Electoral Review 2.0 The Electoral Review Process 3.0 How the Cheshire West & Chester Council has formulated its proposal 4.0 Background Information - Cheshire West & Chester 4.1 Location 4.2 Characteristics 4.3 The Population 4.4 The Economy 4.5 Social Exclusion 4.6 Social Cohesion 5.0 Existing Electoral Arrangements 5.1 Current Electorate 5.2 Current Electoral Arrangements 5.3 Electorate forecasts 5.4 Local Councils 6.0 The
    [Show full text]
  • Ofsted January 2019
    School report Lache Primary School Hawthorn Road, Lache, Chester, Cheshire CH4 8HX Inspection dates 5–6 February 2019 Overall effectiveness Good Effectiveness of leadership and management Good Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good Outcomes for pupils Good Early years provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school Lache Primary School has improved since the Current pupils in key stage 2, including previous inspection. Senior leaders and disadvantaged pupils, are making strong governors work together effectively to ensure progress in a wide range of subjects. that the quality of teaching and pupils’ At the end of key stage 1 in 2018, pupils achievement are good. attained highly in reading and mathematics. Governors are committed and knowledgeable. Pupils benefit from a wide range of extra- They support and challenge senior leaders and curricular activities. In sport, pupils enjoy contribute to the school’s ongoing football, netball and judo and compete development. successfully in inter-school competitions. Teachers make the curriculum interesting and Senior leaders promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, exciting, helping to harness pupils’ imagination social and cultural understanding effectively. and secure their good progress in a wide range However, pupils’ appreciation of cultural of subjects. diversity is not as well developed. Teaching in the resources base, The Willows, is The learning environment in the early years good. Staff are caring and have an in-depth has improved, teaching is good, and children understanding of pupils’ personal, social and make strong progress.
    [Show full text]