Entamoeba Histos>Fca and Entamoeba Dispar
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Entamoeba histoS>fcaand Entamoeba dispar: Mechanisms of adherence and implications for virulence Dylan Ravindran Pillai A thesis subrnitted in confonnity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Medicai Science University of Toronto O Copyright Dylan R. Pillai, 2000 AcquiSiiand Acquisiins et Bblibgtaphic Services services bibliographques The author has granteci a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive iicence allowing the exclusive pettantà la National Lïbrary of Canada to BïbIioth&pe nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, disûibute or seil reproduire, prêter, disniiuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfichef61m, de reproduction sur papier ou sur fotmat electronique. The author retams ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts hmit Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimes reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autonsatioa, In 1925, Emile Brumpt had proposed the existence of two morphologically identical species, Entarnoeba hisrolylica (a human pathogen) and Entmoeba dispm (a non-pathogenic human commensal). Recent molecuiar and genetic evidence has supported the two-species concept. The pathogen relies on the galactose/N-Acetyl-O- galactosamine Iecth for adherence that leads to contact-dependent cytolysis of host target ceils, a key step in amebic vinilence. Work presented here explores the structure, fiinction, and expression of the lectin nom E-histoZyticu and E-dispar. We hypothesized that molecular differences between the pathogenic and non-pathogenic lectin homologues would be instructive in understanding the differentid role of each in colonization (E-dispor) versus invasion (E.histolytica). To acheive this, a gene encoding the lectin in E-dispar (dhgI2) was cloned and sequenced. Homologous lectin message and proteh levels in E. histolyrica and E-dispur under axenic culture conditions were compared. A heterologous expression system (in COS 7 cells) was constructed to test anti-lectin monoclonal antibody reactivity for E. histoi'ytica and E-dispar lectin homologues. Lech protein, which was generated in COS7 cells, was used for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in which antisera from patients infected with pathogen or non-pathogen were tested. Further experiments were also performed in order to localize the carbohydrate recognition domai@) of the amebic lectin using a newly developed in vitro assay. Taken together, evidence is presented supporthg the view that E.histolylica and E-dispar possess highly conserved lectin molecules that are differentially expressed in pathogen vernis non-pathogen. Additional experùnents were Mormed to isolate and characterize a P2 integrin-like molecuie expressed on the amebic dace* Data supporthg the identification of a distinct B2 integrin on the daceof E. histolytica is presented. A putative role for this molecule in amebic virulence is discussed. Finally, epidemioIogîcaI questions regarding E.histolyticu and E.disp4~infections were revisited, now relying on stool antigen immunoassays. These immunoassays, which are able to distinguish E. histoZyticu fiom E.dispar9demonstrated that the overwhelming majonty of infections in a non-endemic setting are caused by the non-pathogen. These results have broad clinical implications since specific molecdar diagnosis would obviate the need for unnecessary chemotherapy of E-dispar infections, with its attendant costs, nsk of side effects, and danger of drug resistance. iii This work is dedicated to my parents, Sam and Kamala, whose love and sacrince are the source of my energies. Above d,I would like to th& Kevin Kain for the guidance, mentorship, and enthusiasm in his laboratory dining the course ofthis work. I would also Wre to dia& Me1 Silverman for having the vision to pursue and foster the MD/PhD programs in Canada, and for aiiowing me to be a part of it at the University of Toronto in my hometown. 1wouid iike to express my gratitude to members of my advisory cornmittee James Brunton, Ian Crandall, and Keiiy MacDonald. Not least, 1owe a great deal to Seth Bitting, Charles Dela Cruz, Anand Ghanekar, Shankar Karunanithi, Rhona Liridsay, Bryan Lo, Christopher Rickerd, and Mieke va.Zante for their golden companionship in recent years, 1- Introduction: Amebiasis and Entmoeba histolyticu infection................................ 1 1.1 Epidemiology of amebiasis: Entmoeba hisrolyh'cu and E. dispar ....... -2 1.2 Current diagnostic ..approach to E.histoZytica Xection............................ 10 1 -3 Treatment of amebiasis. ......................................................... 17 1.4 Pathogenesis of E-hi~olyrcainfection: the key vinilence factors......... 28 1.5 E. histo&tica infection and immunobiology........O......................... 35 1.6 Lectins: an ove~ew............................................................ 41 1.7 The GaVGdNAc Iectin: adhesin and vinilence factor............................. 47 1 -8 Rationaie and Hypotheses....................................................................... 61 1.9 References ....................................................................... -64 II . The cysteine-rich domain of Entamoeba histolytca adherence lectin is sunicient for hi&-aff?nity GaVGaiNAc-specinc binding in vitro ...................................... -87 2.1 Abstract .................................................................................................. -88 2.2 Introduction .......................................................................................... -89 2.3 .Materials & Methods.............................................................................. -90 2.4 Results ...................................................................................................-99 2.5 Discussion. ...................................................................... 109 2.6 References ....................................................................... -113 III. A gene homologous to hgU of Entmoebu histolytica is present and expressed in E. dispar ................... ... ................................................................................... 1 18 3.1 Abstract ................................................................................................... 119 3-2 Introduction.......................................................................................... 120 3 -3. Materials & Methods ............................................................................... 121 3 -4 Results ...............................................................................................126 3.5 Discussion ........................................................................ 131 3 -6 References ....................................................................... -132 N .Molecula. r characteruaton of the WGaINAc lectin of E.dispm ................ -135 4. f Abstract-.............................................................................................. 136 4.2 Introduction.. ........................................................................................ 137 4.3 .Materials & Methods.............................................................................. 139 4-4 Redts. .................................................................................................... 146 4.5 Discussion ........................................................................ 158 4.6 References ........................................................................ 163 V-A novel PZintegrin (CD 18)-Wre molecule participates in Entmoeba histolylica adherence to endothelid celis.. ................................................................................. -168 5.1 Abstract. ............................................................................................ 169 5.2 Introduction............ ... ................................................................... 170 5.3 .Materials & Methods ............................................................................... 172 5 -4 Results .................................................................................................... 1 76 5.5 Discussion ....................................................................... 185 5.6 References. ....................................................................... 189 VI. Entamoeba histolytica and E.dirpar: rnolecular diagnosis. epidemiology. and treatment implications in a non-endemic setting................... .. ............................. 195 6.1 Absmct................................................................................................... 196 6.2 Introduction.......................................................................................... 197 6.3 .Materials & Methods ............................................................................... 199 6.4 Results ...................................... ,... ....................................... 201 6.5 Discussion ........................................................................ 216 6.6 References ........................................................................ 220 VII .Irnmunochromatographic sîrip based detection of Entamoeba histolytica/ E-dispur and Giardia lamblia coproantigen ......................................................... 226