What Are Covered Bonds and Why Should Anyone Care?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Are Covered Bonds and Why Should Anyone Care? What are Covered Bonds and Why Should Anyone Care? Michael S. Gambro, Anna H. Glick, Frank Polverino, Patrick T. Quinn, and Jordan M. Schwartz The authors believe that, given the current political impetus to promote lower costs of funds and greater liquidity for mortgage nancing and a diversity of funding sources, there will be rapid developments in the area of covered bonds. Covered bonds are a form of long-term secured nanc- the issuer’s credit rating. Covered bonds may be issued ing that has been used in Europe for centuries but have pursuant to a specic statutory framework or on a not previously gained popularity in the U.S. credit contractual basis. A structured nance legal structure markets. To date, only two issuers in the United States may be utilized in jurisdictions like the U.S. that lack a have issued covered bonds. However, in light of the statutory framework, or for transactions that do not t recent turmoil in the credit markets, covered bonds are within an existing statutory framework. being promoted as a technique to stimulate the capital markets and provide a long-term funding source for mortgage loan originators. Comparison of Covered Bonds and Mortgage- On July 15, 2008, a nal Covered Bond Policy Backed Securities Statement (the ‘‘Policy Statement’’) was issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the ‘‘FDIC’’).1 Although both mortgage-backed securities (‘‘MBS’’) In addition, on July 28, 2008, the United States Depart- and covered bonds are potential sources of long-term ment of the Treasury issued a best practices guide funding for mortgage loans, there are several signi- intended to ‘‘encourage growth of the covered bond cant dierences between them: market in the United States.’’2 Although no specic E In a typical MBS transaction, the mortgage loans covered bond statute exists in the United States at this are generally treated as having been sold under time, on July 30, 2008, Congressman Scott Garrett (R- current U.S. accounting principles and thus NJ) introduced covered bond legislation.3 removed from the sponsor’s balance sheet. In a covered bond transaction, the mortgage loans What is a Covered Bond? securing the covered bonds remain on the spon- sor’s balance sheet. A covered bond is a security issued by a bank or simi- lar institution that provides on-balance sheet funding E The composition of the cover pool is dynamic in of assets. In general, covered bonds provide recourse that nonperforming (or prepaying) mortgage to both the issuer’s credit and a ‘‘cover pool’’ of high loans must be replaced with performing mortgage quality assets that are insulated or ‘‘ring-fenced’’ from loans or other permitted substitution collateral. In the issuer’s insolvency. As a result of the cover pool, contrast, the pool of mortgage loans underlying covered bonds may receive a credit rating higher than an MBS transaction is static and continues to back the MBS until maturity. The authors, partners with Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, can be Covered bonds are structured to minimize the risk reached at [email protected], [email protected], E [email protected], [email protected], and of prepayment in the event of an issuer default [email protected], respectively. prior to maturity of the bonds. In U.S. deals, this THE REAL ESTATE FINANCE JOURNAL/WINTER 2009 59 What are Covered Bonds and Why Should Anyone Care? is accomplished through an investment contract days upon an FDIC conservatorship or 90 days upon that covers payments on the covered bonds from an FDIC receivership. Therefore, if the FDIC fails to default until maturity. MBS investors, in contrast, make interest payments on covered bonds during the are exposed to prepayment risk, including pre- stay period, covered bondholders would not be able to payment as a result of default. realize on the assets in the cover pool without the consent of the FDIC. Even if the stay period expires, E Covered bonds provide investors with recourse to the sponsor in the event the collateral for the the FDIC only permits foreclosure if it is a self-help covered bonds is insucient to pay the investors remedy that does not require involvement of the FDIC. principal and interest owed on the covered bonds. Otherwise, the FDIC may require any realization upon MBS investors, on the other hand, generally do the assets in the cover pool be eected through the not have any recourse to the sponsor in the event FDIC claims process, resulting in a potentially signi- of repayment of an amount less than the principal cant delay in restitution to covered bondholders. and interest owed. To help ensure that the covered bonds remain outstanding to maturity after a repudiation or liquida- tion of the cover pool, U.S. covered bonds issued to Regulatory Hurdles to U.S. Covered Bonds date have been structured to include an investment In Europe, covered bonds are issued pursuant to statu- contract such as a guaranteed investment contract, de- tory frameworks that exclude the cover pool from the posit agreement or similar instrument (a ‘‘specied insolvency estate of the covered bond issuer. In con- investment contract’’) purchased from a third party. trast, the lack of clear statutory or regulatory manage- The structure can be summarized as follows: an IDI is- ment of insolvency risks has been cited as a cause for sues full recourse mortgage bonds secured by residen- the lack of issuance of covered bonds in the U.S. Only tial mortgage loans to a special purpose vehicle (an two U.S. issuers, Bank of America, N.A. and Washing- ‘‘SPV’’), typically a Delaware statutory trust. The SPV ton Mutual Bank, have issued covered bonds to date. issues covered bonds in the same principal amount to Both of these issuances predate the new regulatory investors. The covered bonds issued by the SPV are guidance discussed in this article. secured by the mortgage bonds issued by the IDI. The Insolvency risk exists in part due to the regulatory SPV enters into the specied investment contract, scheme applicable to potential U.S. issuers of covered which provides for the investment of repudiation or bonds. For an issuer eligible to le for bankruptcy liquidation proceeds in order to provide for payments protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code,4 foreclo- on the covered bonds to be made as scheduled until sure on the assets of the cover pool securing the their maturity date. The SPV also enters into one or covered bonds would be subject to the automatic stay more swap agreements to cover certain mismatches provisions of the Bankruptcy Code upon the issuer’s between the rate, amount, currencies and/or timing of bankruptcy, and the claims on the covered bonds payments on the SPV’s assets and the covered bonds. would be subject to resolution in the bankruptcy case. The IDI would be responsible for the cost of obtaining That would expose the covered bondholders to the risk and maintaining the specied investment contract, any of a ‘‘cram down’’ in which the covered bond obliga- swap agreement and any other liquidity arrangements tions could be restructured. needed to ensure continued payment on the covered bonds if the FDIC fails to continue making payments Banks and other ‘‘insured depository institutions’’ on the covered bonds following the IDI’s insolvency. (‘‘IDIs’’), on the other hand, are not eligible for protec- tion under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, but would be subject to conservatorship or receivership of the FDIC What Does the FDIC Policy Statement Do? upon insolvency. The conservatorship or receivership The Policy Statement was intended to clarify the treat- of an IDI raises two types of insolvency risk for inves- ment of covered bonds upon the insolvency of the is- tors in covered bonds issued by an IDI: that the FDIC suer, and to reduce the costs associated with the ad- would repudiate the obligation of the IDI to perform ditional liquidity required by such structures. on the covered bonds and elect to pay repudiation dam- The Policy Statement provides that if the FDIC ages, and that during the 45 or 90 day stay on foreclo- elects to repudiate an IDI’s contractual obligations with sure pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1821(e)(13), the assets of respect to a covered bond, the repudiation damages are the cover pool would be unavailable to pay the covered ‘‘limited to’’ par plus accrued interest to the date of bonds. As conservator or receiver of an insolvent IDI, appointment of the FDIC. However, in the ‘‘Back- the FDIC is allowed a ‘‘reasonable time’’ to determine ground’’ portion of the Policy Statement, the FDIC either to arm or repudiate a contract of the IDI. In the states that if the FDIC repudiates the covered bonds or event of repudiation, the FDIC would be required to defaults in a payment, ‘‘the par value of the covered pay repudiation damages. bonds plus interest accrued to the date of appointment The other risk is that due to the operation of the stay of the FDIC would be paid in full up to the value of the on foreclosure referred to above, the cover pool cannot collateral.’’ The FDIC states that if the value of the as- be liquidated, without FDIC consent, sooner than 45 sets in the cover pool exceeds par plus accrued interest 60 THE REAL ESTATE FINANCE JOURNAL/WINTER 2009 to the date of the FDIC’s appointment as receiver or What Issues Did the Policy Statement Fail to conservator, the FDIC would recover the excess, and if the value of the assets in the cover pool is less than par Resolve? plus accrued interest to the date of the FDIC’s appoint- The Policy Statement did not adopt the requests made ment as receiver or conservator, the shortfall amount in comment letters to include as part of the repudiation would constitute an unsecured claim against the IDI.
Recommended publications
  • Mortgage Covered Bonds
    COVERED BONDS CREDIT OPINION Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG - Mortgage 12 July 2019 Covered Bonds New Issue Update to New Issue Report, reflecting data as of 31 March 2019 - German covered bonds Ratings Closing date Exhibit 1 September 2001 Cover Pool (€) Ordinary Cover Pool Assets Covered Bonds (€) Rating 19,855,385,490 Commercial mortgage loans 17,159,274,896 Aa1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Ratings 1 Source: Moody's Investors Service Summary 1 Credit strengths 1 Summary Credit challenges 2 The covered bonds issued by Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG (the issuer) under the Deutsche Key characteristics 3 Pfandbriefbank AG - Mortgage Covered Bonds programme are full recourse to the issuer and Covered bond description 3 are secured by a cover pool of assets consisting of commercial assets (73.7%), multi-family Covered bond analysis 4 assets (19.4%), supplementary assets (6.8%) and residential assets (0.1%). Cover pool description 8 Cover pool analysis 11 Credit strengths include the full recourse of the covered bonds to the issuer and support Methodology and monitoring 13 provided by the German legal framework for Pfandbriefe, which provides for the issuer's Appendix: Income underwriting and regulation and supervision. valuation 14 Moody's related publications 15 Credit challenges include the high level of dependency on the issuer. As with most covered bonds in Europe, there are few restrictions on the future composition of the cover pool. 56.4% of the commercial mortgages have bullet repayment. Analyst Contacts Francesca Falconi +44.20.7772.1667 Our credit analysis takes into account the cover pool's credit quality, which is reflected in Analyst the collateral score of 6.8%, and the current over-collateralisation (OC) of 17.1% (on an [email protected] unstressed present value basis) as of 31 March 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Moody's Reviews Pfandbriefe of Several German Landesbanken and Their Subsidiaries
    Announcement: Moody's reviews Pfandbriefe of several German Landesbanken and their subsidiaries Global Credit Research - 06 Jul 2011 London, 06 July 2011 -- Moody's Investors Service has today placed the following covered bonds on review for downgrade, prompted by its review of the respective issuers, implemented on 1 July 2011: - Bayerische Landesbank's mortgage Pfandbriefe: Aaa placed on review for downgrade; previous rating action 21 August 1998, Aaa assigned; - Bayerische Landesbank's public-sector Pfandbriefe: Aaa placed on review for downgrade; previous rating action 21 August 1998, Aaa assigned; - HSH Nordbank AG's mortgage Pfandbriefe: Aaa placed on review for downgrade; previous rating action 7 December 2010, Aaa assigned; - HSH Nordbank AG's public-sector Pfandbriefe: Aaa placed on review for downgrade; previous rating action 18 May 2010, Aaa confirmed; - HSH Nordbank AG's ship Pfandbriefe: A2 placed on review for downgrade; previous rating action 5 May 2010, downgraded to A2; - WestLB's public-sector Pfandbriefe: Aaa placed on review for downgrade; previous rating action 12 May 2006, Aaa assigned; - Deutsche Kreditbank AG's mortgage Pfandbriefe: Aaa placed on review for downgrade; previous rating action 15 July 2009, Aaa assigned; and - Deutsche Kreditbank AG's public-sector Pfandbriefe: Aaa placed on review for downgrade; previous rating action 5 December 2006, Aaa assigned. The ratings assigned to the covered bonds issued by other Landesbanken and their subsidiaries are not affected by this rating action. RATINGS RATIONALE The above reviews were prompted by the review of the respective issuer ratings, see press release "Moody's reviews ratings of German Landesbanken", published 1 July 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Covered Bonds As a Source of Funding for Banks' Mortgage Portfolios
    COVERED BONDS AS A SOUrcE OF Funding FOR BaNKS’ MORTGAge PORTFOLIOS BANK OF CANADA • FinANCIAL SYSTEM REView • JUNE 2018 37 Covered Bonds as a Source of Funding for Banks’ Mortgage Portfolios Toni Ahnert Covered bonds funded only about 3 per cent of the assets of the largest banks and 9 per cent of Canadian mortgages in 2017. Instead, banks have been relying primarily on relatively cheap government-guaranteed mortgage funding options. An increasing portion of mortgages are uninsured and not eligible for government-guaranteed funding, creating the need for alternative funding sources. Covered bonds may fill part of this need, helping to generate a diversified and stable funding mix for mortgages. Overcollateralization requirements and dynamic replenishment of the col- lateral pool can increase risks to unsecured creditors. This could add to the fragility of a bank in the face of negative shocks, with potential spill- overs to other parts of the financial system. Several policy tools are available to help balance the costs and benefits of covered bonds. These include simple issuance caps and adjustments to the pricing of deposit insurance premiums, as well as other types of prudential regulation. Introduction Banks’ choices for funding mortgages and other business activities have an important effect on how efficiently they provide banking services and how effectively they manage risks to their own business and to the financial system. Canadian banks typically use a broad array of funding sources, including equity, deposits and wholesale funding instruments (Chart 1).1 The terms of funding sources differ, ranging from short-term deposits and money market instruments to longer-term funding, including covered bonds and 5- and 10-year debentures.
    [Show full text]
  • COVERED BONDS: a Primer
    COVERED BONDS: A Primer By Charles D. Lansden As the securitization of residential mortgage loans ground to a halt during the current credit crisis, the Department of the Treasury and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation published guidance for the issuance of covered bonds as an alternative means of financing residential mortgages. A covered bond is a debt instrument that is secured by a pledge of a segregated pool of assets (a “cover pool”), but is paid back from an issuer’s cash flow rather than from the assets themselves. A depository institution may directly issue covered bonds or issue a mortgage bond to a bankruptcy remote special purpose vehicle that, in turn, issues covered bonds. Both the Treasury and the FDIC currently restrict the cover pool to residential mortgages, but each of these institutions anticipates that the development of a U.S. covered bond market could lead to other as-set classes serving as collateral in cover pools. There are significant differences between covered bonds and mortgage-backed securities: (i) a covered bond remains on the issuer’s balance sheet; (ii) an investor has recourse against both the issuer and the cover pool; (iii) principal and interest on the covered bond are paid from an issuer’s cash flow; (iv) non-performing assets in the cover pool can be replaced; and (v) guaranteed investment contracts limit the prepayment risk for covered bonds in the event of the issuer’s default. Given that a covered bond is the direct obligation of an issuer, potential investors were concerned about their access to the cover pool upon the issuer’s failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Covered Bonds: Building Green Cover Pools Covered Bonds Are an Ideal Tool to Finance Low Carbon Infrastructure, Having Been Used in Other Public Priority Areas
    BRIEFING PAPER Green Covered Bonds: building green cover pools Covered bonds are an ideal tool to finance low carbon infrastructure, having been used in other public priority areas. Identifying existing green cover pools and developing frameworks for other low carbon assets will help scale up investment. The first green covered bonds Covered Bonds issuance (2011–2015) were issued in 2016 The green bonds market has seen increased 800 diversification in 2016. One of the new green debt products that entered the market was the first green covered bond issued in Germany. 600 The Bank of China also issued a ‘dual recourse’ green bond in November 2016 (not technically a ‘covered’ bond given the lack of 400 dedicated legislation). The USD 500m issue Billions (EUR) is the first of its kind, not only because of the dual recourse structure, but also due to the cover pool, which is made up of Chinese 200 climate-aligned bonds on the banks’ balance sheets. The bonds are part of the ChinaBond China Climate Aligned Bond Index, developed 0 by CCDC, CECEP and Climate Bonds. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Covered bonds support cheaper • Public Sector • Mortgage • Ships • Mixed Assets lending in public sector priority Source: European Covered Bond Council Fact Book, 2016 areas Covered bond markets have proven to be a reliable source of long-term financing for Covered bonds are highly-regulated securities with superior credit ratings and banks to on-lend to specific priority sectors, in lower funding costs than unsecured debt, thanks to a dual recourse structure where bond particular housing and public infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Covered Bond Market1
    Frank Packer Ryan Stever Christian Upper +41 61 280 8449 +41 61 280 9615 +41 61 280 8416 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] The covered bond market1 The covered bond market offers investors an alternative to developed country government securities. The valuation of covered bonds is complex. While there is some evidence of differences in the pricing of these bonds by nationality of issuer, these appear to be only weakly related to differences in the respective legislative frameworks. Recent cases show the pricing of covered bonds to be robust to idiosyncratic shocks to issuer credit risk as well as more systemic shocks to the value of cover pools. JEL classification: G11, G12, G15. Over the past decade covered bonds, or securities issued by financial institutions that are secured by dedicated collateral, have become one of the largest asset classes in the European bond market and an important source of finance for mortgage lending. The collateral, or “cover pool”, is usually put together so as to obtain the highest possible triple-A credit rating. As a consequence, covered bonds offer an alternative to developed country government securities for bond investors interested in only the most highly rated securities. Drawing on the BIS international debt securities statistics and other data sources, this feature analyses the recent evolution of the covered bond market. Exploring the main issues involved in assessing the risk of covered bonds, the feature also documents significant divergences among the major rating agencies. An examination of the determinants of covered bond prices suggests that, while the nationality of the issuer matters, the related differences are generally small.
    [Show full text]
  • Bawag Group Ag Quantitative Disclosure Report According to Regulation (Eu) No. 575/2013 (“Crr”)
    QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURE BAWAG GROUP AG QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURE REPORT ACCORDING TO REGULATION (EU) NO. 575/2013 (“CRR”) 2019 1 QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURE LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Total assets ......................................................................................................................................................6 Table 2: Total liabilities and equity..................................................................................................................................7 Table 3: Differences between accounting and regulatory scopes of consolidation and (…) (1/2) ......................................8 Table 3: Differences between accounting and regulatory scopes of consolidation and (…) (2/2) ......................................9 Table 4: Outline of the differences in the scopes of consolidation (entity by entity).........................................................10 Table 5: Scope of consolidation (IFRS, CRR) (1/3) .......................................................................................................11 Table 5: Scope of consolidation (IFRS, CRR) (2/3) .......................................................................................................12 Table 5: Scope of consolidation (IFRS, CRR) (3/3) .......................................................................................................13 Table 6: Main features, full terms and conditions of capital instruments ........................................................................14 Table 7: Overview of RWAs
    [Show full text]
  • New European Covered Bond Framework
    Latham & Watkins Capital Markets Practice April 22, 2019 | Number 2488 We’ve Got You Covered: New European Covered Bond Framework The new framework should simplify the path for issuers seeking to market European covered bonds to investors in the US. Key Points: The new framework will create minimum product and technical standards for covered bonds, focusing on high-quality cover pool assets. Covered bonds, which are not subject to “bail-in” powers, will have reinforced transparency and investor protections. Spanish covered bond programs will require the most updating, compared with the existing regime. Issuers should consider amending their documentation to facilitate marketing in the US. Covered bonds offer unique benefits to both issuers and investors. Banks and other credit institutions have historically relied on covered bonds as an inexpensive source of funding and have purchased them to use as eligible collateral with the Eurosystem credit window, while institutional investors have valued the favorable risk-weighting of these stable and secure instruments, which typically combine a bankruptcy-remote asset-backed security with the further support of a direct claim against the credit institution issuer1. To date, covered bonds have been issued either pursuant to long-standing statutory frameworks created by the national laws of several EU Member States or by more recent contractual arrangements developed by market participants. However, the liquidity of the European covered bond market has been complicated by such disparate legal
    [Show full text]
  • S&P Global Ratings' Covered Bonds Primer
    S&P Global Ratings' Covered Bonds Primer June 20, 2019 This covered bonds primer provides a comprehensive guide to the fundamentals and key features PRIMARY CREDIT ANALYSTS of the product. Antonio Farina Madrid Let's start with an obvious question… (34) 91-788-7226 antonio.farina @spglobal.com What Is A Covered Bond? Marta Escutia A covered bond is a debt instrument secured by a cover pool of assets. As long as the issuer is Madrid + 34 91 788 7225 solvent, it is obliged to repay its covered bonds in full on their scheduled maturity dates. If the marta.escutia issuer is insolvent, the proceeds from the cover pool assets will be used to repay the bonds. @spglobal.com Covered bonds were first introduced in Prussia in 1769 by Frederick the Great, and in Denmark in ANALYTICAL MANAGER 1797. France issued the first "obligations foncieres" in 1852. Despite such a long history, it was Barbara Florian not until the end of the twentieth century that the size and geographic scope of this market Milan broadened considerably, boosted by the introduction of "jumbo" covered bonds in 1995, the (39) 02-72111-265 introduction of the euro in 1999, and the approval of dedicated legislative frameworks in a number barbara.florian @spglobal.com of new countries. Figure 1 www.spglobal.com/ratingsdirect June 20, 2019 1 S&P Global Ratings' Covered Bonds Primer Key Features Of Covered Bonds - The bond is issued by--or bondholders otherwise have full recourse to--a credit institution which is subject to public supervision and regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions About Covered Bonds
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT COVERED BONDS bolstering its popularity. See “Covered Bond Background Structure Outside of the United States.” European What are covered bonds? issuances remained at historic lows in 2014, and issuances of covered bonds into the United States by Covered bonds are debt obligations that provide non‐U.S. issuers continued to drop dramatically in recourse to the issuer, usually a bank. Upon an issuer 2014 (to approximately $10 billion) as cross currency default, covered bond holders also have recourse to a swap costs made issuing bonds in USD less favorable. pool of collateral (known as the “cover pool”), which There has been some recovery in the issuance of is maintained separate from the issuer’s other assets. covered bonds into the United States in 2015 as cross What type of assets can make up the cover pool? currency swap costs have declined. The cover pool usually consists of high quality assets, How are covered bonds issued? including residential mortgages, public debt, or ship Covered bonds can be issued as a single issuance or loans. Cash, or cash equivalents, also may serve as as a program. Under the Securities Act of 1933 (the cover pool collateral. “Securities Act”), covered bonds are regulated as Are covered bonds a new product? securities and each issuance must be registered under Although relatively new to the United States, covered the Securities Act or exempt from registration. bonds are not a new product. Covered bonds have Covered bond programs issuing in the United States been used to raise capital in Europe since 1769, when often rely on the Rule 144A exemption; however, on the first covered bond was issued in Prussia to July 30, 2012, the Royal Bank of Canada obtained SEC finance agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Covered Bonds Update in the United States
    Covered Bonds Update in the United States October 21, 2020 Jerry Marlatt Laura Drumm Partner RBC Capital Markets [email protected] [email protected] Background: What Are Covered Bonds? 2 What are Covered Bonds? Covered Bond Characteristics • Senior debt of a regulated financial entity • Generally not subject to bail-in • Secured by a pool of financial assets • Mortgage loans – residential or commercial • Public sector obligations • Ship loans • Protected from acceleration in the event of issuer insolvency • By statute or legal structure • Collateral is isolated from insolvency estate of the issuer • Collateral pays bonds as scheduled through maturity • A dynamic collateral pool – refreshed every month • Typically bullet maturity, fixed rate bonds • Repayment liabilities remain on the balance sheet of the originator • Most countries have statutes enabling covered bonds • Very strong implicit government support in many jurisdictions 3 Benefits to Issuing Banks Attributes of Covered Bonds • Lower funding cost than senior bank debt • Extension of WAM for bank funding • Typical maturities for covered bonds in the EU of seven years or more. • Diversification of funding base • Investors typically do not buy RMBS or senior bank debt • Critical funding source in Europe in the sovereign debt crisis • The market was functional throughout the crisis • Avoids “bail-in” risk • Mortgage modifications to accommodate borrower are easy; no competing interests • Brings mortgage finance out of the ‘shadow banking’ world • US legislation would level
    [Show full text]
  • Germany Financial Sector Assessment Program Systemic Liquidity and Bank Funding
    IMF Country Report No. 16/195 GERMANY FINANCIAL SECTOR ASSESSMENT PROGRAM June 2016 SYSTEMIC LIQUIDITY AND BANK FUNDING— TECHNICAL NOTE This Technical Note on Systemic Liquidity and Bank Funding on Germany was prepared by a staff team of the International Monetary Fund. It is based on the information available at the time it was completed in June 2016. Copies of this report are available to the public from International Monetary Fund Publication Services PO Box 92780 Washington, D.C. 20090 Telephone: (202) 623-7430 Fax: (202) 623-7201 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.imf.org Price: $18.00 per printed copy International Monetary Fund Washington, D.C. © 2016 International Monetary Fund ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution GERMANY FINANCIAL SECTOR ASSESSMENT PROGRAM June 2016 TECHNICAL NOTE SYSTEMIC LIQUIDITY AND BANK FUNDING Prepared By This Technical Note was prepared in the context of an Monetary and Capital IMF Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) Markets Department mission in Germany during November 2015 led by Ms. Michaela Erbenova. It contains technical analysis and detailed information underpinning the FSAP’s findings and recommendations. Further information on the FSAP can be found at http://www.imf.org/external/np/fsap/fssa.aspx ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution GERMANY CONTENTS Glossary ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ___________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]