Denija Crnojević & Eva K. Grebel Texas Tech University & Heidelberg
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Denija Crnojević & Eva K. Grebel Texas Tech University & Heidelberg University Dr. Denija Crnojević (Texas Tech University) kindly agreed to present Dr. Eva Grebel’s talk slides during the Division H meeting when she had to cancel her participation in the IAU GA in Hawaii. A review paper focusing on Local Group globular clusters (not star clusters in general) will appear in the proceedings of IAU Symposium 312 (eds. R. Spurzem et al.): Grebel, E.K., “Globular Clusters in the Local Group”, to appear in IAU Symp. 312 on “Star Clusters and Black Holes in Galaxies Across Cosmic Time” held in Beijing 2014, Cambridge Univ. Press, in press. 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 1 M31 and the Milky Way M31: Richest GC system in the LG. > 700 GCs! (MW: ~ 160 GCs). Also numerous young clusters. Huxor et al. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2165 Halo GCs often still associated with tidal tails of disrupted dwarf Mackey et al. 2013, galaxies in which MNRAS, 429, 281 they formed. 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 2 Globular Clusters in M31 and the Milky Way M31 and MW GC metallicity Galleti et al. 2009, distribution functions (here: A&A, 508, 1285; from Lick indices for M31): 245 GCs. 〈[Fe/H]〉M31 ≈ −0.9 dex. 〈[Fe/H]〉MW ≈ −1.3 dex. ➙ M31 GCs overall more metal-rich. 25% of M31 GCs > −0.5 dex. 7% of MW GCs > −0.5 dex. M31: No obvious bimodality like in MW, but 2-component fit with modes at −1.54 and −0.64 dex preferred (in MW: −1.60 and −0.59); also three- component fit possible. 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 3 GCs in M31 Metal-rich GCs: Strongly centered, bulge. Follow HI rotation curve. A few deviant metal-rich GCs in outskirts. “Intermediate”: More widely distributed. “Metal-poor”: widest distribution. Larger velocity dispersion, but still clear rotation signature (contrary to MW GCs!). Galleti et al. 2009, 60’ ∝ 13.8 kpc A&A, 508, 1285 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 4 Cluster age-metallicity relation Clusters in M33 Beasley et al. 2015, MNRAS, 508, 1285 ! M33 disk clusters: Clear ! age-metallicity relation ! (but note large scatter). ! No radial age gradient ! in disk clusters (≤ 6 kpc). ! Clusters younger than 4 ! Gyr: rotate with disk of ! M33 (reduced rotation ! amplitude and increased velocity dispersion ! with higher cluster age; similar to MW). ! Mean metallicity of inner M33 GCs: high ! ( 〈[m/H]〉 = −1.12 ± 0.09 dex). Also kinem- Beasley et al. 2015, ! atics support association with thick disk. MNRAS, 508, 1285 ! At least six outer halo GCs with projected ! galactocentric radii of 10 – 50 kpc. ! Low number: M33 halo stripped in past ! encounters with M31? Age – velocity-dispersion relation Beasley et al. 2015, MNRAS, 508, 1285 Cockcroft et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 112 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 5 (Globular) Clusters in M31 and the Milky Way Wang et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 20 Huxor et al. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2165 ", ✕: M31 GCs #: MW GCs : M31 extended GCs Δ: M31 young clusters Trends: Tidal radii rt increase with (projected) galactocentric distance. On average larger half-light radii at Rgc > 30 kpc. Extended GCs may fill the gap between (ultrafaint) dSphs and GCs. 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 6 Globular Clusters in the Milky Way , 504 355 rc depends on initial structural conditions of cluster. Little effect of tidal history, while rh quickly adjusts to new potential (Miholics et al. 2014). Similarity of structural parameters in GCs in dwarf satellites and MW halo: MackeyGilmore & 2004, MNRAS, Indication of possible accretion origin of “young” halo GCs. 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 7 Globular cluster accretion from dwarf galaxies Assume: GC metallicity traces host galaxy metallicity at time of formation. ❏ Offset in MW GC age-metallicity relation: 0.6 dex (∝ stellar mass ❏ difference of ~ 2 dex). Leaman et al. 2013, ❏ Halo GCs on metal- MNRAS, 436, 122 ❏ poor branch: Well ❏ fitted by age-metal- ❏ licity relation of LG dIrrs. Much of MW halo GC system may have come from ~ 6 – 7 WLM- to LMC-sized dIrrs. ❏ Metal-rich branch: ❏ formed in situ in MW ❏ disk/bulge. See also Forbes & Bridges 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1203 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 8 GC disruption Additionally, GCs may get disrupted by disk and bulge crossings or internal relaxation. A few cases of ongoing dissolution were found in MW halo. (e.g., Odenkirchen et al. 2001, ApJ, 548, L165; Odenkirchen & Jordi & Grebel 2010, A&A, 522, 71). Grebel 2001 Quantifying contrib- ution to halo field stars by searching for field stars with light element abun- dance anomalies: Possible 2nd genera- tion stars from dis- Martell & Grebel 2010, A&A, 519, 14; solved GCs. Martell et al. 2011, A&A, 534, 136 ➙ ~ 17% of halo field stars originally from GCs. 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 9 Specific GC frequency: S = N · 100.4 (Mv+15) GCs contributed by the Sgr dSph N GC ❏ 5 high-, 4 moderate, 2 low- Law & Majewski 2010, AJ, 718, 1128 ❏ confidence GC members. ❏ ~ 8 ± 2 genuine GCs. ❏ SN ~ 5 – 9 for initial Sgr ❏ luminosity of MV = −15. ❏ M54: GC at core of Sgr ❏ (formed elsewhere and sank to ❏ center via dynamical friction). ❏ In the (HB-type, [Fe/H] plane), ❏ Sgr is contributing “young halo” ❏ GCs with predominantly red HBs ❏ (Arp 2, NGC 4147) and “old halo” GCs (!) with mainly blue HBs. ❏ When fully disrupted, Sgr will (probably) have contributed up to 3 – 4 ❏ metal-rich, young objects to the Galactic halo, which have no counter- ❏ counterparts even among the “young halo” GCs. 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 10 5 Globular Clusters in Fornax dSph GCs #1 – 3, #5 in Fornax: −2.5 dex −2.1 dex ~ indistinguishable in age; as old as oldest MW GCs. GC #4: ~ 3 Gyr younger, −1.9 dex. Buonanno et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 1671 −2.4 dex −2.2 dex Buonanno et al. 1998, ApJ, 501, L33 Note 2nd parameter effect in ~ coeval, metal- poor GCs! Smith et al. 1996, AJ, 111, 1596 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 11 NGC 185 Globular Clusters in M31’s Dwarf Ellipticals ! NGC 147: 8 – 10 GCs. Mainly old stellar populations, gas/dust free. ! NGC 185: ~ 7 GCs (incl. “young” and “old halo” GCs). Strong intermediate-age ! populations, some intermed.-age clusters (a few Gyr), nuclear cluster, gas, dust. ! NGC 205: ~ 6 GCs (incl. “young” and “old halo” GCs). 7 – 11 Gyr, −1.1 – −2 dex. ! Many intermed.-age clusters esp. ~ 1 – 2 Gyr; [m/H] > −0.8 dex. Nuclear cluster. Ellipse: B = 25 mag/arcsec2 isophote SN of dEs in Virgo & Fornax clusters consistent with those of M31’s dEs. Veljanoski et al. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 3654 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 12 Distribution of Star Clusters in the Magellanic Clouds ❏ “Old” LMC clusters (blue dots: > 4 Gyr) trace bar-like structure, slightly ❏ rotated against younger star cluster distribution. ❏ SMC disk and Bridge better traced by associations. ❏ LMC associations also trace leading edge, but its outer clusters ❏ form loose ring around entire LMC (not seen in associations). ❏ “Old” LMC clusters also in outer parts (not only in bar). ❏ “Old” SMC clusters preferentially found in outer parts. LMC Magellanic Bridge SMC Associations Bica et al. 2008, MNRAS 389, 678 Clusters 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 13 Recent Star Formation History of the LMC ❏ Ages of 1193 populous LMC star clusters from resolved CMDs taken from the ❏ Magellanic Clouds Photometric Survey (Glatt, Grebel, & Koch 2010, A&A 517, 50). ❏ Note how star formation migrates along the bar and how different disk regions ❏ become active at different times. Age < 20 Myr 20 Myr ≤ age < 50 Myr 30 Dor Ellipses show approximate location of supergiant shells. 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 14 Recent Star Formation History of the LMC ❏ Ages of 1193 populous LMC star clusters from resolved CMDs taken from the ❏ Magellanic Clouds Photometric Survey (Glatt, Grebel, & Koch 2010, A&A 517, 50). 50 Myr ≤ age < 100 Myr 100 Myr ≤ age < 250 Myr 250 Myr: approx. one rotation period of the LMC. 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 15 Recent Star Formation History of LMC and SMC ❏ Ages of populous LMC and SMC star clusters from resolved CMDs from the ❏ Magellanic Clouds Photometric Survey (Glatt, Grebel, & Koch 2010, A&A 517, 50). 250 Myr ≤ age < 500 Myr LMC clusters Age histo- grams of populous LMC and SMC star SMC clusters clusters from re- solved CMDs: Similar peaks in the age distribution may Star clusters formed during the have been triggered by close encounters previous rotation period of the LMC. between the Clouds (and the MW). 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 16 Magellanic Cloud Cluster Core Radii vs. Ages ❏ Spread in cluster ❏ core radii (rc) ❏ increases with age. , 65 ❏ Young massive 386 4 ❏ (> 10 M!) clusters: , 138 ❏ rc ~ 1 – 2 pc; 138 ❏ oldest clusters: [pc] c ❏ up to 8 pc. r ❏ GCs in Fornax & ❏ Sgr dSphs also et al. 2009, AJ, AJ, et al.2009, ❏ fit this trend, as Mackey et al.2008,MNRAS Glatt ❏ do MW GCs (esp. ❏ “young” halo GCs). log (age) [yr] 08/07/2015 Crnojevic & Grebel: Local Group Star Clusters 17 LMC Star Cluster Survivability Cluster frequency divided by field SFH. LMC No. of clusters formed per unit stellar mass ~ constant up to 200 Myr. Then sharp drop − onset of et al.2013, MNRAS,430,676 dissolution.