DOCSLIB.ORG

South of the Borough Neighbourhood Committee 5 September 2017 Information Section 1. Dates of Next Meetings and Potential Forthc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South of the Borough Neighbourhood Committee 5 September 2017 Information Section 1. Dates of Next Meetings and Potential Forthc South of the Borough Neighbourhood Committee 5 September 2017 Information Section 1. Dates of next meetings and Potential forthcoming business Tuesday 7 November 2017 - venue: Tolworth Girls School, Fullers Way North, Surbiton KT6 7LQ Green Lane/Church Lane Safety Review Hemsby Road area traffic management review Jubilee Way Cycle Scheme Mid October - Potential additional Neighbourhood Conversation on Traffic and Transportation – to be confirmed Wednesday 24 January 2018 - venue: Chessington Methodist Church, Church Lane, KT9 2DJ Waiting restrictions at south end of Green Lane – outcome of consultation Wednesday 21 February 2018 – Neighbourhood Conversation: venue to be confirmed – Wednesday 14 March 2018: venue: Tolworth Girls School Fullers Way North, Surbiton KT6 7LQ Elmcroft Drive - Local Area of Special Character (LASC) designation (deferred because Conservation Area designation criteria are undergoing review) 2. Traffic Schemes Updates 2.1 TfL Update An update from Transport for London (TfL) is attached. The following are comments provided in a TfL email to Mr Robb on 26 July from the TfL Borough Engagement Manager South in response to questions (shown in small size italics) raised by Mr Robb for the 5 July Neighbourhood Committee: (These updates will be transferred into the next TfL traffic scheme update as a record going forward.) “Subject: public question for 5/7 RBK Nhd Cttee: relations with TfL Further to my emails below I have now received further information from colleagues. For clarity I’ve written the relevant issue from Rob Robb in red (small font italics) , and the response from my colleagues beneath. Also attached …….an updated version (of the TfL update to the March meeting) named ‘august notes’, which my colleagues were also asked to provide an update on. Signage for Cox Lane Industrial Estate (1) We are still awaiting revised signage on our major roads to stop large lorries trying to cut through to Cox Lane Industrial Estate and getting stuck. The last thing I heard they had produced some signs but had forgot about some of the Bridge Heights on the routes so had to go back and revisit the project. Did suggest a system of repeater signs similarly to that you get when travelling towards an Historic Site (see attached) I know they do not conform to DFT’s criteria but the concept is what I was trying to get over. Cox Lane Industrial Estate is located near several low bridges making access for HGVs difficult. We are currently signing HGVs travelling to the industrial estate to exit the A3 at Tolworth. This is far from ideal as there is also a height restriction at Tolworth bridge, limiting access to the industrial estate for high vehicles. We have spoken to businesses within Cox Lane industrial estate to explain the issue of access and to request they in turn liaise with their logistics companies to limit the size of vehicle used when delivering goods here. However we have been advised this is not a practical solution as businesses here cannot request a certain size vehicle travel to specific sites. There are alternative routes into the industrial estate; however length and width restrictions have been installed to limit HGV presence on residential roads. We are continuing to work with borough officers to identify a suitable route for all businesses to access the industrial estate. Road Network (2) As you are aware notices suddenly appeared on railings on a stretch of the A243 saying some were being removed under the auspices of “The Guard Rail Team” . As Residents we cannot see any common sense reason why these are being removed and have asked TFL to just keep the Status Quo. However the danger with setting up a Team is “The “Team” has to justify itself. We believe we are not alone and Residents of Cheam apparently have the same issue with TFL. In fact we feel that at one point we need new Guard Rails to cover recent upgrade by TFL in the kerbs and pavements at Elm Road – A243 Junction traffic lights commissioned by TFL, pedestrians tripping over the higher more acute edged kerb stone profile; rather using the staggered lowered kerbs. The attached email sent by me to Cllr Thompson on 26.06.17 covers the issue of pedestrian guardrail removal. TfL has a palate of materials and designs that can be used on the road network that are considered suitable and understandable for all road users. The island in the middle of a staggered crossing can be the same level as the road surface but the outside defined through high kerbs which guide pedestrians to the appropriate crossing point. For this staggered crossing design, high kerbs are a requirement to enable blind or partially sighted users to identify the edge of the island if they use a cane. If pedestrians use the island as intended by following the stagger between the two crossing points the high kerbs should not pose a trip hazard. (3) The replacement of the A3 Barrier at the end of Elmcroft Drive. We have gone past the second “sell by date” on this, hopefully we do not have any further incidents at this point, see attached. Works in this location are programmed for August 2017. (4) The problem you brought up at the AGM, i.e. the state of the Round About at the Ace of Spades. As previously mentioned “I don’t think TFL do joined up thinking” We have seen the new footbridge installed across the Under Pass, we have seen the slip roads completely resurfaced. The contractor stored his vehicles on the centre of the roundabout overnight during the project but TFL could not get that contractor to repair the infrastructure of the roundabout itself. I did ask at the time. Just another small issue on the slip road on the A309 coming up from Hinchley Wood, we used to have a right turn arrow in the right hand lane so that traffic turning left or going straight on flowed more efficiently. Although the department of transport traffic signs Manual does advise it would appear Highways England uses common sense: DFT’s Traffic Sign’s Manual Chapter 5, 8.31 “Right turn arrows are best avoided on the approach lanes to a roundabout, other than a mini-roundabout, particularly as they can mislead overseas drivers used to driving on the right. Where a right hand lane is dedicated to a specific destination, this should be associated with an ahead arrow until the vehicle is in the circulatory carriageway”. TFL has decided you cannot have a right hand turn arrow at a roundabout because foreign drivers might turn right too early and go around the roundabout the wrong way. Maybe this could be readdressed when we have completed article 50. (see below) Unfortunately the kerbs at the roundabout are being struck by large vehicles. Our maintenance team have repaired the kerbs in the past but they have been knocked on a few occasions. I am unable to confirm if they were in need of repair when the footbridge was installed or the slip roads resurfaced. Regardless of this, separate traffic management measures are likely to be needed to repair the kerbs above what was required to do those works. As mentioned the kerbs at the roundabout are getting damaged by large vehicles. Further investigation is needed to ascertain exactly where and why this is happening. As part of the same piece of work, arrows on the slip roads and destination signing can be reviewed. Unfortunately we are unable to investigate this further this financial year as our funding is now fully committed. Due to the comprehensive spending review within TfL, schemes next financial year (starting April 2018) are being prioritised as again we have very limited funding available. It may therefore be we cannot investigate this any further until 2019/20. (5) Cross Roads at Malden Rushett. although TFL spent £M’s on improvements to the cross roads at Malden Rushett there are still issues with Vehicles turning right from Fair Oak Lane and Rushett Lane and it need readdressing. Malden Rushett Residents Association are trying to communicate with TFL over this issue. https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.3412838,- 0.317363,3a,75y,240.61h,99.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s86RHjDRTX7ZjnNkqM5wH7A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 TfL representatives met with residents to discuss this issue at Malden Rushett. Video surveys were subsequently commissioned to identify the frequency and timing of when the right turn issue from Fairoak Lane and Rushett Lane occurs. Video surveys showed a right turning vehicle trapped in the junction just a couple of times in 2 days of data. Both instances were at different times of the day. Although the vehicles did become trapped in the junction, on both occasions the vehicle began the right turn manoeuvre when the traffic lights were green. As there is no pattern and such low frequency of occurrence, our enforcement team cannot actively target the issue. The traffic signals at Malden Rushett are already at capacity with queues developing on approaches during peak periods. A review of the traffic signals has found the traffic signal timings are at their optimum and remain balanced for all users of the network. It is felt that with the widening of the junction (the feeling of openness on these approaches) may be contributing to this issue. Fairoak Lane and Rushett Lane are 40mph and change down to 30mph close to the junction approach. This combined with the open land on the north side and the new two lane approach may be causing drivers to resist slowing down as they go through the junction. Ways of slowing down vehicles on the approaches of Fairoak Lane and Rushett Lane could be looked at in order to help increase compliance of the red signals and we are liaising with borough officers to this effect to see if speed reduction or traffic calming measures can be introduced on the approach to the junction.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Seed of an Idea
    Issue 29 The best thing to come out of Surbiton since the A3 Summer 2016 Aria kidding me? A piece An operatic backing track accompanies June’s of cake farmers’ market in Maple Charlotte looks Road as the singers from pleased with Opera d’Amici perform on her work; a cake the balcony of the French decorated with a Table. Hannah Kirk and burrowing bunny. her colleagues from the That’s its white company founded in 2001 powder-puff tail will sing at 11.15am. disappearing underground. She made it guided by She sure looks Purdy Sue Smith of the Spooky or what? Lee Johnston romped to Surbiton branch of victory in the Dog That Looks Most Like the British Sugarcraft Its Owner category at the community Guild, which gave sports day’s dog show which helped round sugar design novices off this year’s Surbiton Food Festival. lessons and tips The Berrylands blonde’s flowing locks at the Museum of perfectly matched the colour of cocker Futures, Brighton spaniel Purdy’s floppy ears to gain the Road, as part of rosette in an event judged by staff at the the recent Surbiton Surbiton Veterinary Hospital. Purdy’s the Food Festival. Adults one licking her nose, by the way. were taught to create Two consecutive weekends of hot rose sprays out of weather ensured this year’s festival was a sugar while children triumph, with more food-related events were shown how to than ever before. decorate cup cakes The village fete was a high point, with with characters from crowds thronging St Andrew’s Square as Minions or the Mad the mercury soared.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuller's Brewery Surrey County League
    Fuller's Year Book 2016 Master Layout 10-3-16 :Fullers Contents and clubs STATs 18/3/16 11:34 Page 1 FULLER’S BREWERY SURREY COUNTY LEAGUE (Inaugurated January 17th 1991) 2016 HANDBOOK CONTENTS Page Chairman’s Report . 2 League Officials . 3 Directory of Clubs 2016 . 4 Averages, Records & 2015 League Tables . 37 Honours Boards . 47 Photographic record of the 2015 season . 52 League Cup Draw . 60 20/20 Cup Competition Groups . 61 League Milestones . 62 Rules and Regulations . 64 Rules and Constitution . 65 League Structure . 69 General Playing Conditions . 69 Match Regulations - Time Games . 76 Match Regulations - Limited Overs and League Cup Games . 79 League Cup Competition Rules . 81 20/20 Competition Rules . 84 Disciplinary Code . 88 Ground & Facility Standards . 93 League Fixtures 2016 . 97 Result Reporting . 107 Important Dates . 108 Published by FULLER’S BREWERY SURREY COUNTY LEAGUE Produced by: STR Design & Print Ltd., Carshalton, Surrey SM5 2JR 020 8647 9790 www.str.uk.com Front Cover: 1st XI Premier Division Best Batsman, Chris Spooner (Haslemere) cuts past keeper Ben Brown (Merrow) on his way to 86. Photo: Haslemere Herald 1 Fuller's Year Book 2016 Master Layout 10-3-16 :Fullers Contents and clubs STATs 18/3/16 11:34 Page 2 CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTION It is difficult writing a cricket related piece in the middle of February, when the warm days of summer seem so far off – but then the sun came out for a while this morning, and I started to look forward to the season. And we do have good things to look forward to: Fuller’s have agreed to renew their generous sponsorship, so we can continue to be grateful for their largesse.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Please Contact: James Stanton 020 8547 4627/FAX 020 8547 5125 E-Mail: [email protected]
    For enquiries on this agenda please contact: James Stanton 020 8547 4627/FAX 020 8547 5125 e-mail: [email protected] This agenda is available on www.kingston.gov.uk/council/CommitteeMinutes 13 September 2004 AGENDA A meeting of the SOUTH OF THE BOROUGH PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE will be held at EVANGELICAL HALL, BROOK ROAD, OFF HOOK ROAD, SURBITON on TUESDAY 21 SEPTEMBER 2004 at 7:30 pm Members of the Committee Chessington North & Hook Ward Councillor Sue Baker Councillor Ian Reid Councillor Mary Reid Chessington South Ward Councillor Patricia Bamford Councillor Martin Blakebrough Councillor Shiraz Mirza Tolworth & Hook Rise Ward Councillor Rolson Davies Councillor Vicki Harris (Chair) Councillor Rob Lee Date of Meetings: Planning Sub-Committee The following meetings will take place only if there is sufficient business to warrant a separate Planning Sub-Committee, otherwise planning applications will be considered by the Neighbourhood Committee. Wednesday 17 November 2004 - Tolworth Girls School, Fullers Way North Wednesday 15 December 2004 - Southborough School, Hook Road, Surbiton Wednesday 9 February 2005 – Moor Lane Junior School, Moor Lane, Chessington Wednesday 13 April 2005 - Tolworth Girls School, Fullers Way North Neighbourhood Committee Wednesday 10 November 2004 – Moor Lane Junior School, Moor Lane, Chessington Wednesday 8 December 2004 – Moor Lane Junior School, Moor Lane, Chessington Wednesday 2 February 2005 - Tolworth Girls School, Fullers Way North Wednesday 23 March 2005 - Southborough School, Hook Road, Surbiton EMERGENCY EVACUATION ARRANGEMENTS If the fire alarm sounds please leave the building by the nearest exit. 2 AGENDA 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2. MINUTES To confirm the minutes of the meeting held 23 June 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Download: Inspector's Report on the Core Strategy
    Appendix A – Changes proposed by the Council to make the Core Strategy sound These Council Changes (CC) are proposed by the Council in response to points raised and suggestions discussed during the Examination and they are required to make the plan sound. The changes below are expressed either in the conventional form of strikethrough for deletions and underlining for additions of text, or by specifying the change in words in italics. The page numbers and paragraph numbering below refer to the submission CS, and do not take account of the deletion or addition of text. Policy / No. Page Change Paragraph CC3 7 2.5 New sentence at the end: Figure 1 shows the structure of the Core Strategy guidance and how it links to the Kingston Plan and to the mechanisms to deliver the strategy. Insert Figure 1 as shown in the revised Figures. CC1 14 3.28 The Core Strategy must take account of and follow national planning policy, as set out in Planning Policy Statements (PPSs) and Planning Policy Guidance Notes (PPGs), or any future national guidance prepared by the government. CC4 20-21 Objectives Insert amended list of Objectives as shown in Schedule 1. CC3 20 4.3 Add to the end: Further guidance on how these objectives will be applied locally is set out in paragraphs 4.4 and 4.5 and regard should be given to these paragraphs when applying these objectives. The policies and guidance in the Core Strategy has taken account of both the objectives and the guidance in paragraphs 4.4 and 4.5 CC3 25-51 Neighbour- See Schedule 2 for details of changes to Neighbourhoods CC6 & 59- hoods and and Tolworth and Kingston Town Centre Key Areas of 69 Key Areas Changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Emission Zone Consultation Report April 2007 Annex D Stakeholder Representations
    Report to the Mayor following consultation with stakeholders, businesses, other organisations and the public, April 2007 Annex D: Details of stakeholder representations received during the consultation Introduction This Annex contains TfL’s consideration of representations and objections received from stakeholders. For the purposes of analysis, the representations have been categorised into broad ‘themes’ and ‘sub-themes’ according to the issues raised. This means that a representation from a respondent that commented on more than one issue has been split up accordingly and dealt with under the appropriate theme. When analysing the representations and objections to the consultation, best endeavours were made to accurately record all issues raised. Annex D 1 Report to the Mayor following consultation with stakeholders, businesses, other organisations and the public, April 2007 Index Page number Theme A: The principle of the Low Emission Zone.......................................................................... 5 A1: Support/Oppose a LEZ .......................................................................................................... 5 A2: Revenues............................................................................................................................. 10 A3: Increased bureaucracy......................................................................................................... 11 A4: Other principle issues..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LONG DITTON RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION RESPONSE to ELMBRIDGE LOCAL PLAN STRATEGIC OPTIONS CONSULTATION (Regulation 18) February 2017
    LONG DITTON RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION RESPONSE TO ELMBRIDGE LOCAL PLAN STRATEGIC OPTIONS CONSULTATION (Regulation 18) February 2017 CONTENTS: Summary of Response Main Response Issue 1: The local plan process: decisions on meeting housing needs Issue 2: Housing Supply Issue 3: Housing Targets and Infrastructure Issue 4 - The Green Belt Review and Local Area 58 – Long Ditton’s Green Belt Conclusions 1 Long Ditton Residents Association: Who we are The Long Ditton Residents Association (LDRA) is a non-political and non-sectarian organisation. It does not sponsor councillors on Elmbridge Borough Council. As such, it is free to represent the residents of Long Ditton. Its aims are to preserve Long Ditton from over-development, maintain its character, improve its amenities and defend its surrounding Green Belt. Put another way, the LDRA tries to make Long Ditton a better place in which to live. It plays an active role in all planning matters that affect Long Ditton and is in continuous contact with Surrey and Elmbridge Councils on a wide variety of other issues, including traffic and recreation areas. A Summary of our response Elmbridge Borough Council (EBC) is currently reviewing its 2011 Local Plan and as part of this process is consulting residents on options for the proposed housing target which aims to meet Elmbridge’s ‘objectively assessed’ housing need of 9,480 to 2035 (i.e. the unconstrained assessment of housing needs). EBC has proposed three ‘options’ as part of its consultation; Option 1 would involve a significant increase in the density of development in existing urban areas and Options 2 and 3 would both involve developing areas of Green Belt.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of London Oral History Archive
    ORAL HISTORY RECORDING TRANSCRIPT ‘Fighting for our Rights’ project Surname Gaff Given name Brian Date of birth 1950 Place of birth Wandsworth, London Date of interview 26 May 2017 Length of interview 01:17:04 Number of tracks 1 Name of interviewers Uloma Paris, Callistus Dywili, Jen Kavanagh Copyright © Kingston Museum and Heritage Service, courtesy of Brian Gaff Q: This is an oral history interview with Brian Gaff by Uloma Paris on Friday 26th of May 2017. Also present are. CD: Callistus Dywili. JK: And Jen Kavanagh. Q: The interview is taking place at Brian’s home as part of the Kingston Centre for Independent Living’s fighting for our rights project. Please could you state your full name. A: Well it’s Brian Gaff, I haven’t got a middle one, I’m--, unfortunately. Q: What is your date of birth? A: [REMOVED] 1950. Q: Where were you born? A: Well I don’t remember that far back but it was somewhere near Wandsworth I should imagine [laughs], that’s where my parents were living at the time. Q: What were your parents’ names? A: They were Muriel and Frank Charles Gaff. I can’t remember whether Muriel had a second name or not, if she did she didn’t let me know what it was [laughs]. Q: What were their professions? A: My father was a TV engineer, and my mother was sort of a telephonist secretary, that sort of thing, you know? And, you know, mix and match really. 1 Q: Where did you go to school? A: Well I can’t remember the school that I first went to because it was in Wandsworth, but here I went to Buckland Road, I think, for about six months, for a year--, till I became eligible for the juniors which was then Moor Lane which is now no longer that of course.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Local Centers in the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
    A Study of Local Centers in The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames ii A Study of Local Centers in The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment of the requirements of a Degree of Bachelor of Science Submitted by: Allen Blaylock Shane Jackson Harsha Prasad Victoria Spofford Project advisors Dominic Golding and Melissa-Sue John Sponsor Liaison Alex Rosser-Trokas The Council of the Royal Borough of Kingston This project was the work of four WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of completion of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its website without editorial or peer review iii Abstract The purpose of this project was to update and expand the 2009 Local Centers Study for the Kingston Council. The team devised an improved audit methodology to obtain and synthesize data on the status and health of local urban centers. The study found most centers are in good health with only a small handful ailing. The report can serve as a template for future studies of center health and deficiency in Kingston and other boroughs. iv Acknowledgements We would like to thank many people for helping us throughout the duration of our project, providing us with valuable information and insights. Their expertise and guidance allowed us to expand and fulfill the potential for our project. Alex Rosser-Trokas, Policy and Planning Committee, RBK Council Andrew Lynch, Policy and Planning Committee, RBK
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Applicants
    SOUTHBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS The School Southborough High School is a non-selective academy school for boys between the ages of 11 and 16, and boys and girls post 16. The roll is just over 840, over 190 of whom are in the sixth form. Southborough High is a thriving school which provides a high quality of education in a happy and purposeful atmosphere. It is continually developing and improving and has a very good reputation locally. Our OFSTED Inspection in December 2017 was very successful and catalogues a range of high achievement by pupils and staff. All applicants are invited to read the Ofsted Report which is available on our school website. Southborough High has a reputation for innovation which will attract staff who are both enthusiastic and ambitious. There is a real welcome for new staff who bring new ideas, commitment, energy and professionalism to our school in order to help every student realise their true potential. The Location The school is situated on the Hook Road (A243), south of Surbiton, close to the roundabout above the A3 Hook Underpass, known locally as the Ace of Spades. It is served by buses from Kingston, Surbiton, Tolworth, New Malden, Chessington, Epsom and Leatherhead. Junction 9 of the M25 is only a few miles to the south. The school is surrounded by pre and post war suburban housing estates with local parks and recreation grounds making a pleasant environment. There is a parade of shops near to the school and 'business park' alongside the nearby A3. The school has a positive and improving reputation.
    [Show full text]
  • London Buses - Route Description
    CONTRACT SPECIFICATION Tenders are requested for the following contract to operate a bus service. Contract Reference QC38502 Route Number 465 Terminus Points Kingston, Cromwell Road Bus Station to Dorking, South Street Contract Basis Incentivised Commencement Date 30 June 2012 Vehicle Type 60 capacity, dual door, single deck buses will be specified (alternative bids with existing 55 capacity, dual door, single deck buses may also be submitted). Current Maximum Approved 10.2 metres long and 2.4 metres wide Dimensions Advertising Rights Operator Sponsored Route No Minimum Performance Std Departing on Time - No less than 82.00% Extension Threshold Departing on Time Threshold - 86.00% Minimum Operated Mileage No less than 98.00% Tender Return Date: no later than 12 o’clock on 4th July 2011. SERVICE SPECIFICATION CONTENTS 1) NOTES 2) SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS & PINCHPOINTS 3) QSI POINTS & MILEAGE 4) OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS 5) CURRENT PERFORMANCE, ROUTE RECORD & IBUS MILEAGE 1) NOTES Proposed Changes: At this time, no changes are proposed to the existing service for introduction prior to the commencement of the new Route Agreement for Route No. 465. Tenderers should note that the following alterations (subject to consultation) are proposed as part of this Service Specification for introduction with the new Route Agreement: • 60 capacity, dual door, single deck buses will be specified (alternative bids with existing 55 capacity, dual door, single deck buses may also be submitted), subject to a satisfactory route test. Requirements for Registration: The section of Route No. 465 between Dorking, Townfield Court and the Surrey County Boundary at Kingston Road (at junction with Worcester Park Road) will need to be registered with the Traffic Commissioner for the South Eastern and Metropolitan Western Traffic Area 56 days before the operation commences.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Schedule 465-55815-Su-LU-1-1
    Schedule 465-55815-Su-LU-1-1 Schedule information Route: 465 No. of vehicles used on 3 schedule: Service change: 55815 - SCHEDULE Implementation date: 22 June 2021 Day type: Su - Sunday Operator: LU - LONDON UNITED Option: 1 Version: 1 Schedule comment: Copy from Schedule: 465-57619-Su-LU-1-1 Option comment: 465-71 200426 v0 TS09 DS09 SCN54264 Timing points Timing point Transit node Stop CHSSWA Chessington, World Of Adventures KC06 WORLD OF ADVENTURES 4520 Chessington World Of Adventures CHSSWA Chessington, World Of Adventures KC07 CHESSINGTON W OF A STAND BP5683 Chessington World Of Adventures DORKSN Dorking Station KC57 DORKING STN LONDON ROAD OC87 Dorking Station DORKSN Dorking Station KC68 DORKING STATION APPROACH OC75 Dorking Station DORKSS S DORKING, SOUTH STREET STAND J8612 DORKING SOUTH ST DORKSS DORKING, SOUTH STREET S DORKTC Dorking, Townfield Court KC62 DORKING OLD BUS GARAGE OC803 South Street / Rose Hill DORKTC Dorking, Townfield Court KC62 DORKING OLD BUS GARAGE OC81 Townfield Court HOOKAS Hook, Ace Of Spades Roundabout KB04 HOOK ACE OF SPADES 4516 Southborough High School HOOKAS Hook, Ace Of Spades Roundabout KB05 HOOK ACE OF SPADES 4515 Southborough High School HOOKLB Hook, Library KB08 HOOK LIBRARY 15733 Hook Parade HOOKLB Hook, Library KB08 HOOK LIBRARY 15734 Hook Parade KINGCBES Kingston, Cromwell Road Bus Station (East Side) J6418 KINGSTON, CROMWELL ROAD BUS STATION KINGCB Kingston, Cromwell Road Bus Station, East Side Stand ES KINGCB Kingston, Cromwell Road Bus Station K118 CROMWELL RD BUS STATION BP1084 Cromwell Road
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from Kingston
    to Heathrow 111 HOUNSLOW to Ealing Broadway 65 85 57 Buses from Airport 281 Kew Gardens 371 Putney Bridge Clapham Park Hounslow Bus Station 481 Richmond Putney Atkins Road to West RICHMOND Richmond Richmond Manor Road Sainsbury’s Kingston Bus Station Putney Heath Green Man Whitton Admiral Nelson Middlesex Hospital Roehampton Medfield Street Streatham Hill 285 X26 Hanworth Road Queens Road Roehampton Vale ASDA to Heathrow Duke of York Twickenham Broughton Ashburnham Petersham American University K3 Airport Avenue Road The Dysart Streatham St Leonard’s Church Twickenham King Street ROEHAMPTON Robin Hood Staines Road Ham The Fountain HAM Ham Kingston Vale Robin Hood Lane Way K5 Dukes Avenue/ Richmond Road/ Tooting Broadway 131 Hatton Dysart Avenue Tudor Drive Cross Fulwell Dukes Avenue The Cardinal Bowness Stanley Road Kingston Hill Crescent Kingston University Colliers Wood Dysart Cardinal Avenue Kingston Hill Feltham Avenue Queens Road Merton Abbey Hanworth Library Hail & Ride Teddington section Hanworth Apex Corner Teddington Canbury Broad Street Lock Wych Elm Tudor Drive South Wimbledon Park Road K2 Kingston Hanworth Swan Hampton Sainsbury’s . U TE D K4 Hospital GA R GS N D D Wimbledon Teddington KI A N87 Hampton Hampton RO N Coombe Hampton Schools Police Station O COWLEAZE RD. Park Road River Thames River to Hanworth Road Hill Wick OPWITH M Uxbridge (not X26) S H V Lane West WAY C ELM ROAD High Street I Traps Lane Raynes Park Aldwych Nurserylands Road R CANBURY PARK Park Road Sandy Lane Kingston The Avenue STREET A1 Z1 A2 A3 216 to Staines (not X26) D New Victoria O CROMWELL RD.
    [Show full text]