PRL-3 Promotes Ubiquitination and Degradation of AURKA And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PRL-3 Promotes Ubiquitination and Degradation of AURKA And Published OnlineFirst November 29, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0520 Cancer Molecular Cell Biology Research PRL-3 Promotes Ubiquitination and Degradation of AURKA and Colorectal Cancer Progression via Dephosphorylation of FZR1 Cheng Zhang1,2, Like Qu1, Shenyi Lian1,3, Lin Meng1, Li Min1,4, Jiafei Liu1, Qian Song1, Lin Shen2, and Chengchao Shou1 Abstract The oncogenic phosphatase PRL-3 is highly expressed in rectal cancer specimens showed that expression of PRL-3 was metastatic colorectal cancer but not in nonmetastatic colorec- associated with high status of CIN and poor prognosis, which tal cancer or noncolorectal cancer metastatic cancers. Although were antagonized by expression of AURKA. PRL-3 enhanced the proinvasive capacity of PRL-3 has been validated in mul- AURKA ubiquitination and degradation in a phosphatase- tiple types of cancer, its impact on colorectal cancer progres- dependent fashion. PRL-3 interacted with AURKA and FZR1, sion and the underlying mechanisms remain poorly under- a regulatory component of the APC/CFZR1 complex. Destabi- stood. Here, we report that overexpressed PRL-3 stimulates lization of AURKA by PRL-3 required PRL-3-mediated dephos- FZR1 G2–M arrest, chromosomal instability (CIN), self-renewal, phorylation of FZR1 and assembly of the APC/C complex. and growth of colorectal cancer cells in xenograft models, Our study suggests that PRL-3–regulated colorectal cancer while colorectal cancer cell proliferation is decreased. PRL-3– progression is collectively determined by distinct malignant induced G2–M arrest was associated with decreased expression phenotypes and further reveals PRL-3 as an essential regulator of Aurora kinase A (AURKA). PRL-3–promoted slow prolifer- of APC/CFZR1 in controlling the stability of AURKA. ation, CIN, self-renewal, and growth in xenografts were coun- teracted by ectopic expression of AURKA. Conversely, knock- Significance: Dephosphorylation of FZR1 by PRL-3 facil- down of PRL-3 resulted in low proliferation, S-phase arrest, itates the activity of APC/CFZR1 by destabilizing AURKA, thus impaired self-renewal, increased apoptosis, and diminished influencing aggressive characteristics and overall progression xenograft growth independently of AURKA. Analysis of colo- of colorectal cancer. Introduction and the identification of molecular determinants of metastatic colorectal cancer may benefit the prevention and treatment of this Although the incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer disease. The dual-specificity phosphatase PRL-3 (phosphatase of have been declining for decades, it remains a major health regenerating liver-3, PTP4A3) was originally found to be over- problem (1). Approximately 50% of patients with colorectal expressed in metastatic lesions of colorectal cancer in liver (3, 4), cancer develop liver metastases during the course of disease but not in nonmetastatic colorectal cancer or noncolorectal progression and 80% to 90% of metastatic lesions are not resect- cancer metastatic cancers. To date, the proinvasive capacity of able (2). Deeper understanding of the biological characteristics PRL-3 has been well documented (4). Curiously, despite of PRL-30s phosphatase activity, only limited proteins were identi- fi 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Key Laboratory of Carci- ed as its substrates, whereas phosphorylation of several critical nogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking signaling factors was found to be enhanced by PRL-3 (4–8). PRL-3 University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China. 2Department of Gastro- could reprogram the secretome of colorectal cancer cells (5), intestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational inhibit apoptosis (6, 7), promote epithelial mesenchymal tran- Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & sition (EMT; ref. 8), and modulate cell-cycle progression (7, 9). Institute, Beijing, China. 3Department of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Carci- The oncogenic function of PRL-3 was further verified by mouse nogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China. 4Department of Gastro- models, in which colitis-associated colon tumorigenesis was enterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National reduced by PRL-3 knockout (10, 11), or was exacerbated by Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, PRL-3 transgene (12). Colon tumors from PRL-3 knockout mice Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Disease, Beijing, had impaired clonogenicity (11), implying that PRL-3 plays an China. essential role in maintaining self-renewal of tumor-initiating cells. Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research These findings underline PRL-30s roles in controlling a wide Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/). spectrum of biological events during tumorigenesis. However, Corresponding Authors: Like Qu, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular the functional associations among these PRL-3–regulated phe- Biology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, notypes and their contribution to colorectal cancer progression Beijing 100142, China. Phone: 8610-8819-6769; Fax: 8610-8812-2437; E-mail: remain unclear. [email protected]; and Lin Shen, [email protected] As the substrate recognition elements for the APC/C (anaphase- doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0520 promoting complex/cyclosome), FZR1 (fizzy and cell division Ó2018 American Association for Cancer Research. cycle 20 related 1, aka CDH1) and CDC20 play crucial roles in cell 928 Cancer Res; 79(5) March 1, 2019 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2019 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst November 29, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0520 PRL-3 as an APC/CFZR1 Activator fate decision and tumorigenesis (13, 14). APC/CCDC20 is activated were kindly given by Prof. Xuemin Zhang (National Center of from prometaphase to telophase, while APC/CFZR1 is activated Biomedical Analysis, Beijing, China). mCherry-H2B–labeled FZR1 from late anaphase to next G1 phase (15). APC/C promotes HCT116 cells were kindly given by Prof. Qinghua Shi (University mitotic exit by catalyzing ubiquitination-dependent proteolysis of Science & Technology of China, Beijing, China). Cell lines were of cyclins, CDC20, PLK1, and Aurora kinases (13, 16). Mutation- maintained in RPMI1640 or high glucose DMEM (Invitrogen) al-loss or impaired expression of FZR1 was found in various medium supplemented with 10% FCS (Invitrogen) and 0.1% human tumors (17), while FZR1 homozygous deletion results gentamicin (Invitrogen). All cell lines were authenticated by short in chromosomal instability (CIN) and mouse embryonic lethality tandem repeat profiling. Mycoplasma test was performed monthly (18). Both APC/CFZR1 and APC/CCDC20 are tightly controlled by by qPCR amplification of M. hyorhinis p37 and Hochest33258 cofactor binding and posttranslational modifications to ensure staining. the proper progression of cell cycle and to maintain the chromo- Antibodies for pT288-AURKA (#3079), CDC2 (#28439), PLK1 somal integrity (13–18). CDK/cyclin-mediated phosphorylation (#4513), pY15-CDC2 (#4539), phospho-tyrosine (#9411), pS10- of FZR1 prevents its recruitment to the APC/C core complex and H3 (#53348), and ubiquitin (#3936) were purchased from Cell FZR1 inactivates APC/C from late G1 to mitotic exit (13, 16, 18). Signaling Technology. Antibodies for AURKA (ab52973), cyclin FZR1 is also phosphorylated by ERK, thereby stabilizing a subset A2 (ab181591), cyclin B1 (ab32053), cyclin D1 (ab16663), cyclin of oncogenic APC/CFZR1 substrates to support melanomagenesis E1 (ab33911), FZR1 (ab3242), and TOP2A (ab52934) were (19). Conversely, dephosphorylation of FZR1 by PP2AB55 or purchased from Abcam. Antibodies for APC1 (BS1611, Bio- CDC14 facilitates the assembly and subsequent activation of world), CDC27 (610455, BD), phospho-Serine/Threonine APC/CFZR1 (16, 17). Independently of the phosphatase activity, (612548, BD), myc-tag (AB103, TianGen), and GAPDH nuclear PTEN promotes the formation of APC/CFZR1 complex and (60004, Proteintech) were also purchased. Monoclonal antibody enhances its tumor-suppressive function (20). Other phospha- against PRL-3 was generated and characterized previously (12). tases targeting FZR1 are yet to be identified. Nocodazole and MG132 were obtained from Selleck. Cyclo- During anaphase, APC/CFZR1 promotes AURKA ubiquitination heximide was from Cell Signaling Technology. ProTAME was and proteolysis, thereby controlling mitotic spindle reorganiza- from R&D Systems. Recombinant human PRL-3 protein was tion and mitotic exit (13, 21). AURKA amplification and over- obtained from Origene. Lipofectamine 3000 was from Invitrogen. expression were implicated in mitotic disturbance, CIN induc- FITC-phalloidin was from Sigma-Aldrich. tion, and neoplastic progression (21–23). Although being reported as oncogenic, controversial findings addressing AURKA's Plasmids and RNA interference prognostic indications existed. Activation and overexpression of Plasmids for wild-type PRL-3, PRL-M (C104S, phosphatase fi D AURKA were preferentially detected in early-stage/low-grade as activity de cient), and PRL-D ( CAAX-motif deleted) were pre- fi well as noninvasive ovarian tumors, suggesting its alternation viously constructed and veri ed (27). pcDNA3.1 plasmids expres- could be an early event
Recommended publications
  • Predicting FOXM1-Mediated Gene Regulation Through the Analysis of Genome-Wide FOXM1 Binding Sites in MCF-7, K562, SK-N-SH, GM12878 and ECC-1 Cell Lines
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Predicting FOXM1-Mediated Gene Regulation through the Analysis of Genome-Wide FOXM1 Binding Sites in MCF-7, K562, SK-N-SH, GM12878 and ECC-1 Cell Lines 1, , 2, 1 3,4 Keunsoo Kang * y, Yoonjung Choi y, Hoo Hyun Kim , Kyung Hyun Yoo and Sungryul Yu 5,* 1 Department of Microbiology, College of Science & Technology, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea; [email protected] 2 Deargen Inc., Daejeon 34051, Korea; [email protected] 3 Laboratory of Biomedical Genomics, Department of Biological Sciences, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea; [email protected] 4 Research Institute of Women’s Health, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea 5 Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Semyung University, Jecheon 27136, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (S.Y.); Tel.: +82-41-550-3456 (K.K.); +82-43-649-1418 (S.Y.) These authors contributed equally to the work. y Received: 22 June 2020; Accepted: 24 August 2020; Published: 26 August 2020 Abstract: Forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) is a key transcription factor (TF) that regulates a common set of genes related to the cell cycle in various cell types. However, the mechanism by which FOXM1 controls the common gene set in different cellular contexts is unclear. In this study, a comprehensive meta-analysis of genome-wide FOXM1 binding sites in ECC-1, GM12878, K562, MCF-7, and SK-N-SH cell lines was conducted to predict FOXM1-driven gene regulation. Consistent with previous studies, different TF binding motifs were identified at FOXM1 binding sites, while the NFY binding motif was found at 81% of common FOXM1 binding sites in promoters of cell cycle-related genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Fzr1 in Embryogenesis
    ROLE OF FZR1 IN EMBRYOGENESIS SEAH KAY YI MICHELLE BSC. (HONS I) PH.D THESIS Statement of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award for any other Degree or Diploma in any University or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University library, being made available for loan and photocopying subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Seah Kay Yi Michelle 17th December 2012 Page | ii Acknowledgements I would like to sincerely express my appreciation and gratitude to my supervisors, Keith and Janet for giving me this opportunity and to share their wisdom and guidance throughout my PhD. I would also like to extend my thanks to all the lab members including Evan, Jess, Julie, Kyra, Nicole, Phoebe, Simon, Sophia, Suzanne and Yan. Thank you for your company and help throughout my PhD, it has made this an enjoyable experience in the lab. To my family especially Popo, Mummy and Daddy, thank you for the endless love, support and understanding that you have showered upon me. For that, I will be eternally grateful. Thank you for moulding me into the person that I am today, for without all of you, I will not be where I am today. I love you and will always be your little girl. To Clara, my BFF, thank you for your encouragements and to always be there for me.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of the Mammalian APC/C Activator FZR1 Shortens G1 and Lengthens S Phase but Has Little Effect on Exit from Mitosis
    4208 Research Article Loss of the mammalian APC/C activator FZR1 shortens G1 and lengthens S phase but has little effect on exit from mitosis Reinhard Sigl1, Cornelia Wandke1, Veronika Rauch1, Jane Kirk2, Tim Hunt2 and Stephan Geley1,* 1Division of Molecular Pathophysiology, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria 2Clare Hall Laboratories, Cancer Research UK, South Mimms, England, UK *Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Accepted 10 September 2009 Journal of Cell Science 122, 4208-4217 Published by The Company of Biologists 2009 doi:10.1242/jcs.054197 Summary The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is knockdown of p53 in U2OS cells with inducible FZR1 siRNA essential for progression through mitosis. At anaphase onset, also failed to restore their proliferative capacity. Thus, the the APC/C requires the activator protein CDC20 to target proliferation defects are a direct consequence of the genetic securin and cyclin B1 for proteasome-dependent degradation, damage inflicted by loss of FZR1 function and are largely but then depends on the CDC20-related protein FZR1 (also independent of p53. In summary, mammalian FZR1 is not known as CDH1) to remain active until the onset of the next S required for the completion of mitosis, but is an important phase. To investigate the role of FZR1 in mammalian cells, we regulator of G1 phase and is required for efficient DNA used RNAi in human cell lines and conditional gene targeting replication in human and mouse somatic cells. in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. In neither case was FZR1 required for exit from mitosis, but in cells lacking FZR1, the Supplementary material available online at G1 phase was shortened and the S phase was prolonged.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Gene Expression Response to Neutron and X-Ray Irradiation Using Mouse Blood Constantinos G
    Broustas et al. BMC Genomics (2017) 18:2 DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-3436-1 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Comparison of gene expression response to neutron and x-ray irradiation using mouse blood Constantinos G. Broustas1, Yanping Xu2, Andrew D. Harken2, Guy Garty2 and Sally A. Amundson1* Abstract Background: In the event of an improvised nuclear device detonation, the prompt radiation exposure would consist of photons plus a neutron component that would contribute to the total dose. As neutrons cause more complex and difficult to repair damage to cells that would result in a more severe health burden to affected individuals, it is paramount to be able to estimate the contribution of neutrons to an estimated dose, to provide information for those making treatment decisions. Results: Mice exposed to either 0.25 or 1 Gy of neutron or 1 or 4 Gy x-ray radiation were sacrificed at 1 or 7 days after exposure. Whole genome microarray analysis identified 7285 and 5045 differentially expressed genes in the blood of mice exposed to neutron or x-ray radiation, respectively. Neutron exposure resulted in mostly downregulated genes, whereas x-rays showed both down- and up-regulated genes. A total of 34 differentially expressed genes were regulated in response to all ≥1 Gy exposures at both times. Of these, 25 genes were consistently downregulated at days 1 and 7, whereas 9 genes, including the transcription factor E2f2, showed bi-directional regulation; being downregulated at day 1, while upregulated at day 7. Gene ontology analysis revealed that genes involved in nucleic acid metabolism processes were persistently downregulated in neutron irradiated mice, whereas genes involved in lipid metabolism were upregulated in x-ray irradiated animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphorylation of the Anaphase Promoting Complex
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Phosphorylation of the Anaphase Promoting Complex activator FZR1/CDH1 is required for Meiosis II entry in mouse male germ cell Nobuhiro Tanno1,2, Shinji Kuninaka2, Sayoko Fujimura3, Kazumasa Takemoto1, Kaho Okamura1, Naoki Takeda4, Kimi Araki4,5, Masatake Araki4, Hideyuki Saya2 & Kei-ichiro Ishiguro1 ✉ FZR1/CDH1 is an activator of Anaphase promoting complex/Cyclosome (APC/C), best known for its role as E3 ubiquitin ligase that drives the cell cycle. APC/C activity is regulated by CDK-mediated phosphorylation of FZR1 during mitotic cell cycle. Although the critical role of FZR1 phosphorylation has been shown mainly in yeast and in vitro cell culture studies, its biological signifcance in mammalian tissues in vivo remained elusive. Here, we examined the in vivo role of FZR1 phosphorylation using a mouse model, in which non-phosphorylatable substitutions were introduced in the putative CDK- phosphorylation sites of FZR1. Although ablation of FZR1 phosphorylation did not show substantial consequences in mouse somatic tissues, it led to severe testicular defects resulting in male infertility. In the absence of FZR1 phosphorylation, male juvenile germ cells entered meiosis normally but failed to enter meiosis II or form diferentiated spermatids. In aged testis, male mutant germ cells were overall abolished, showing Sertoli cell-only phenotype. In contrast, female mutants showed apparently normal progression of meiosis. The present study demonstrated that phosphorylation of FZR1 is required for temporal regulation of APC/C activity at meiosis II entry, and for maintenance of spermatogonia, which raised an insight into the sexual dimorphism of FZR1-regulation in germ cells. Anaphase promoting complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) controls timely transitions of mitotic cell cycle phases by pro- moting ubiquitylation and degradation of many key cell cycle regulators1.
    [Show full text]
  • Biocreative 2012 Proceedings
    Proceedings of 2012 BioCreative Workshop April 4 -5, 2012 Washington, DC USA Editors: Cecilia Arighi Kevin Cohen Lynette Hirschman Martin Krallinger Zhiyong Lu Carolyn Mattingly Alfonso Valencia Thomas Wiegers John Wilbur Cathy Wu 2012 BioCreative Workshop Proceedings Table of Contents Preface…………………………………………………………………………………….......... iv Committees……………………………………………………………………………………... v Workshop Agenda…………………………………………………………………………….. vi Track 1 Collaborative Biocuration-Text Mining Development Task for Document Prioritization for Curation……………………………………..……………………………………………….. 2 T Wiegers, AP Davis, and CJ Mattingly System Description for the BioCreative 2012 Triage Task ………………………………... 20 S Kim, W Kim, CH Wei, Z Lu and WJ Wilbur Ranking of CTD articles and interactions using the OntoGene pipeline ……………..….. 25 F Rinaldi, S Clematide and S Hafner Selection of relevant articles for curation for the Comparative Toxicogenomic Database…………………………………………………………………………………………. 31 D Vishnyakova, E Pasche and P Ruch CoIN: a network exploration for document triage………………………………................... 39 YY Hsu and HY Kao DrTW: A Biomedical Term Weighting Method for Document Recommendation ………... 45 JH Ju, YD Chen and JH Chiang C2HI: a Complete CHemical Information decision system……………………………..….. 52 CH Ke, TLM Lee and JH Chiang Track 2 Overview of BioCreative Curation Workshop Track II: Curation Workflows….…………... 59 Z Lu and L Hirschman WormBase Literature Curation Workflow ……………………………………………………. 66 KV Auken, T Bieri, A Cabunoc, J Chan, Wj Chen, P Davis, A Duong, R Fang, C Grove, Tw Harris, K Howe, R Kishore, R Lee, Y Li, Hm Muller, C Nakamura, B Nash, P Ozersky, M Paulini, D Raciti, A Rangarajan, G Schindelman, Ma Tuli, D Wang, X Wang, G Williams, K Yook, J Hodgkin, M Berriman, R Durbin, P Kersey, J Spieth, L Stein and Pw Sternberg Literature curation workflow at The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR)…..……… 72 D Li, R Muller, TZ Berardini and E Huala Summary of Curation Process for one component of the Mouse Genome Informatics Database Resource …………………………………………………………………………....
    [Show full text]
  • TOPDRIVER: the Novel Identifier of Cancer Driver Genes in Gastric
    Razavi et al. Applied Network Science (2019) 4:83 Applied Network Science https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-019-0200-x RESEARCH Open Access TOPDRIVER: the novel identifier of cancer driver genes in Gastric cancer and Melanoma Seyed Mohammad Razavi1,2, Farzaneh Rami2, Seyede Houri Razavi1,2 and Changiz Eslahchi1,2* *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract 1Computer Science Department, Nowadays, research has found a strong relationship between genomic status and Mathematical sciences faculty, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, occurrence of disease. Cancer is one of the most common diseases that leads to a high Iran annual mortality rate worldwide, and the disease’s genetic content remains 2School of Biological Sciences, challenging. Detecting driver genes of different cancers could help in early diagnosis Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), and treatment. In this paper, we proposed TOPDRIVER, a network-based algorithm, to Tehran, Iran detect cancer driver genes in cancers. An initial network was constructed by integrating four different omic datasets: HPRD, NCBI, KEGG, and GTEx. This integration created a gene similarity profile that provided a comprehensive perspective of gene interaction in each subtype of cancer and allocated weights to the edges of the network. The vertex scores were calculated using a gene-disease association dataset (DisGeNet) and a molecular functional disease similarity. In this step, the genes network was jagged and faced with a zero-one gap problem. A diffusion kernel was implemented to smooth the vertex scores to overcome this problem. Finally, potential driver genes were extracted according to the topology of the network, genes overall biological functions, and their involvement in cancer pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Concordance of Copy Number Loss and Down-Regulation of Tumor Suppressor Genes: a Pan-Cancer Study Min Zhao1 and Zhongming Zhao2,3,4,5*
    The Author(s) BMC Genomics 2016, 17(Suppl 7):532 DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2904-y RESEARCH Open Access Concordance of copy number loss and down-regulation of tumor suppressor genes: a pan-cancer study Min Zhao1 and Zhongming Zhao2,3,4,5* From The International Conference on Intelligent Biology and Medicine (ICIBM) 2015 Indianapolis, IN, USA. 13-15 November 2015 Abstract Background: Tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) encode the guardian molecules to control cell growth. The genomic alteration of TSGs may cause tumorigenesis and promote cancer progression. So far, investigators have mainly studied the functional effects of somatic single nucleotide variants in TSGs. Copy number variation (CNV) is another important form of genetic variation, and is often involved in cancer biology and drug treatment, but studies of CNV in TSGs are less represented in literature. In addition, there is a lack of a combinatory analysis of gene expression and CNV in this important gene set. Such a study may provide more insights into the relationship between gene dosage and tumorigenesis. To meet this demand, we performed a systematic analysis of CNVs and gene expression in TSGs to provide a systematic view of CNV and gene expression change in TSGs in pan-cancer. Results: We identified 1170 TSGs with copy number gain or loss in 5846 tumor samples. Among them, 207 TSGs tended to have copy number loss (CNL), from which fifteen CNL hotspot regions were identified. The functional enrichment analysis revealed that the 207 TSGs were enriched in cancer-related pathways such as P53 signaling pathway and the P53 interactome.
    [Show full text]
  • FOXM1 Binds Directly to Non-Consensus Sequences in the Human Genome Deborah A
    Sanders et al. Genome Biology (2015) 16:130 DOI 10.1186/s13059-015-0696-z RESEARCH Open Access FOXM1 binds directly to non-consensus sequences in the human genome Deborah A. Sanders1,4, Michael V. Gormally1, Giovanni Marsico1, Dario Beraldi1, David Tannahill1 and Shankar Balasubramanian1,2,3* Abstract Background: The Forkhead (FKH) transcription factor FOXM1 is a key regulator of the cell cycle and is overexpressed in most types of cancer. FOXM1, similar to other FKH factors, binds to a canonical FKH motif in vitro. However, genome-wide mapping studies in different cell lines have shown a lack of enrichment of the FKH motif, suggesting an alternative mode of chromatin recruitment. We have investigated the role of direct versus indirect DNA binding in FOXM1 recruitment by performing ChIP-seq with wild-type and DNA binding deficient FOXM1. Results: An in vitro fluorescence polarization assay identified point mutations in the DNA binding domain of FOXM1 that inhibit binding to a FKH consensus sequence. Cell lines expressing either wild-type or DNA binding deficient GFP-tagged FOXM1 were used for genome-wide mapping studies comparing the distribution of the DNA binding deficient protein to the wild-type. This shows that interaction of the FOXM1 DNA binding domain with target DNA is essential for recruitment. Moreover, analysis of the protein interactome of wild-type versus DNA binding deficient FOXM1 shows that the reduced recruitment is not due to inhibition of protein-protein interactions. Conclusions: A functional DNA binding domain is essential for FOXM1 chromatin recruitment. Even in FOXM1 mutants with almost complete loss of binding, the protein-protein interactions and pattern of phosphorylation are largely unaffected.
    [Show full text]
  • FZR1 As a Novel Biomarker for Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Liu et al. Cell Death and Disease (2020) 11:804 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-03004-9 Cell Death & Disease ARTICLE Open Access FZR1 as a novel biomarker for breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy prediction Shuo Liu1,HaobinWang2,JunLi1,JianhuiZhang3,JianWu2,YiLi4, Yongjun Piao1,LeitingPan5,RongXiang 1,6 and Shijing Yue 1 Abstract The concept of breast-conserving surgery is a remarkable achievement of breast cancer therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being used increasingly to shrink the tumor prior to surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is reducing the tumor size to make the surgery with less damaging to surrounding tissue and downstage locally inoperable disease to operable. However, non-effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy could increase the risks of delaying surgery, develop unresectable disease and metastatic tumor spread. The biomarkers for predicting the neoadjuvant chemotherapy effect are scarce in breast cancer treatment. In this study, we identified that FZR1 can be a novel biomarker for breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to clinical patient cohort evaluation and molecular mechanism investigation. Transcriptomic data analysis indicated that the expression of FZR1 is correlated with the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that FZR1 is pivotal to the chemotherapy drugs induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. FZR1 is involved in the stability of p53 by impairing the phosphorylation at ser15 site. We demonstrate that the expression of FZR1 detected by quantification of IHC can be an effective predictor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in animal experiment and clinical patient cohort. To obtain more benefit for breast cancer patient, we propose that the FZR1 IHC score using at the clinical to predict the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Cycle Arrest Through Indirect Transcriptional Repression by P53: I Have a DREAM
    Cell Death and Differentiation (2018) 25, 114–132 Official journal of the Cell Death Differentiation Association OPEN www.nature.com/cdd Review Cell cycle arrest through indirect transcriptional repression by p53: I have a DREAM Kurt Engeland1 Activation of the p53 tumor suppressor can lead to cell cycle arrest. The key mechanism of p53-mediated arrest is transcriptional downregulation of many cell cycle genes. In recent years it has become evident that p53-dependent repression is controlled by the p53–p21–DREAM–E2F/CHR pathway (p53–DREAM pathway). DREAM is a transcriptional repressor that binds to E2F or CHR promoter sites. Gene regulation and deregulation by DREAM shares many mechanistic characteristics with the retinoblastoma pRB tumor suppressor that acts through E2F elements. However, because of its binding to E2F and CHR elements, DREAM regulates a larger set of target genes leading to regulatory functions distinct from pRB/E2F. The p53–DREAM pathway controls more than 250 mostly cell cycle-associated genes. The functional spectrum of these pathway targets spans from the G1 phase to the end of mitosis. Consequently, through downregulating the expression of gene products which are essential for progression through the cell cycle, the p53–DREAM pathway participates in the control of all checkpoints from DNA synthesis to cytokinesis including G1/S, G2/M and spindle assembly checkpoints. Therefore, defects in the p53–DREAM pathway contribute to a general loss of checkpoint control. Furthermore, deregulation of DREAM target genes promotes chromosomal instability and aneuploidy of cancer cells. Also, DREAM regulation is abrogated by the human papilloma virus HPV E7 protein linking the p53–DREAM pathway to carcinogenesis by HPV.Another feature of the pathway is that it downregulates many genes involved in DNA repair and telomere maintenance as well as Fanconi anemia.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Cycle Transcription Control by Ubiquitin Signaling
    CELL CYCLE TRANSCRIPTION CONTROL BY UBIQUITIN SIGNALING Anthony P. Arceci A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology in the School of Medicine Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Ian J. Davis Channing J. Der Robert J. Duronio Brian Kuhlman Michael J. Emanuele © 2019 Anthony P. Arceci ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Anthony P. Arceci: Cell Cycle Transcription Control by Ubiquitin Signaling (Under the direction of Michael J. Emanuele) The cell cycle is a tightly regulated series of molecular events which dictates proliferation. Both the timely activation of genes through transcription and destruction of proteins through the ubiquitin-proteasome system are integral to normal cell cycles. Dysregulation of these networks often underlie a variety of malignant diseases such as cancer. Forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) is an essential cell cycle transcription factor. FOXM1 regulates a transcriptional network that controls the G2/M transition and G1/S transition. Additionally, aberrant upregulation of the FOXM1 transcriptional network is linked to a variety of cancers. The kinases which activate FOXM1 are well explored, but the influence of the ubiquitin-proteasome system on FOXM1 remains unclear. Here, I described the role that two such enzymes, the E3 ubiquitin ligase CUL4-VPRBP and the deubiquitinating enzyme (DUB) USP21, have on the stability and activity of FOXM1 in both normal and dysregulated cell cycles. First, I demonstrate that FOXM1 degradation is enhanced by association with CUL4- VPRBP. Depletion of VPRBP enhances FOXM1 stability and causes mitotic entry defects.
    [Show full text]