The 1970 Soviet Census of Population: Content, Organization, and Processing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The 1970 Soviet Census of Population: Content, Organization, and Processing THE 1970 SOVIET CENSUS OF POPULATION: CONTENT, ORGANIZATION, AND PROCESSING Frederick A. Leedy, U.S. Bureau of the Census On January 15, 1970, the Soviet Union will begin of all political subdivisions, correctinE taking its fifth census of population. Soviet updating maps, compiling lists of all law has no requirements for regular censuses, and and dwellings in each populated place, and check- the four previous enumerations of the population ing the accuracy of urban dwelling registers and in the U.S.S.R. were taken at varying intervals- - village household registers. On the basis of 1920, 1926, 1939, and 1959. The one comprehen- this work, which has been given great attention sive census of population in Russia prior to the and apparently is being carried out in exhaustive Soviet period was taken by the Tsarist Government detail, all cities and counties have been divided in 1597. into census districts, instructor (crew -leader) districts, and enumeration districts.2 Plans for the 1970 census call for the same elab- orate and extensive preparations and procedures As part of this preparatory work, a mass publici- which have characterized all censuses in the ty campaign has been building up, and from now U.S.S.R. since 1926, plus several innovations until census time it will attempt to acquaint including the use of sampling procedures for part every Soviet citizen with the census and obtain of the questions to be asked, the use of special his cooperation. Millions of brochures and leaf- schedules to collect data on the able -bodied pop- lets are to be distributed, the press, radio, and ulation that is not employed and on the commuting television are to be utilized, and massive habits of workers and students within the major numbers of "agitators" from the trade unions, urban areas, and the use of electronic computers Komsomol, and other organizations are to give for processing the results. This paper will lectures and lead discussions on the census.3 describe briefly the preparations being made for the census, the enumeration procedures to be used, Staffing and Training the questions to be asked, and the plans for Plans call for the recruitment of some 670,000 processing and publishing the results. special personnel to conduct the census, includ- ing 540,000 enumerators, 100,000 instructors, Preparatory Work 26,000 census district chiefs, and 4,000 assist- Preparations for the census have been underway ants to the heads (inspectors) of the statistical for a number of years. The Administration for offices at the county level.4 This is an the All -Union Census of Population, which was increase of nearly 100,000 over the 574,000 established within the Central Statistical Admin- persons actually used in 1959 (of whom 465,000 istration of the U.S.S.R. in 1957 to take the were enumerators). Each enumerator in urban 1959 census, has remained as an integral part of areas will list an average of 675 persons; each the statistical system and presumably has been enumerator in rural areas will list an average of developing plans for the 1970 census from the 575 persons. time it completed work on the 1959 census. Since official announcement of this next census was The temporary personnel will consist of school made on May 1, 1966, there have been numerous teachers, instructors and students from colleges meetings and conferences held to discuss the and vocational -technical schools, and employees census program and procedures, and many articles of factories, offices, collective farms, and devoted to the subject in journals and the press. state farms. All will be selected by the local statistical office, with the approval of the In March 1967, a test census was taken in nine county or city soviets. Employed persons will rayons, or counties, of varied geographic, eco- continue to receive their regular salaries while monic, and social characteristics throughout the absent from their jobs, which will be from 17 country. This census, which covered some 536,000 working days for enumerators to 56 working days persons, was designed as a pretest of both ques- for assistants to the heads of the county statis- tions to be asked and enumeration procedures. As tical offices. In 1959 the temporary census a result of that experience, the questions con- workers received an enumeration bonus in addition tained in the present schedules were approved and to their regular pay, although this has not been numerous questions, particularly those on details mentioned for the 1970 census. of fertility, migration, and housing, were deleted. In addition, the Census Administration Brief training courses are to be held for each of decided that a self -enumeration procedure did not the various categories of personnel. They began work well and should not be used in the full in June for the chiefs of the republician statis- census.l tical administrations and will end in December when enumerators will be trained. During the latter part of 1965 and the first part of 1969, regional, county, and local offices of Enumeration Procedures the Statistical Administration have been engaged During a period of 4 days before the census in the detailed work necessary to delineate begins, each enumerator is to make a complete enumeration districts. Under direction from the tour of his district, checking the map and list Council of Ministers U.S.S.R., all republic, of dwelling units prepared by the statistical regional, and local soviets have provided assis- office. He is to call on each household, verify tance to the statistical offices in preparing the address and name of the head of the household, lists of populated places, verifying boundaries 470 note the number of persons living there, and additional people (0.14 percent of the total determine what time will be most convenient for enumerated earlier) were picked up. him to call to take the census. When in the opinion of the enumerator the members of the Population to be Covered household are capable of completing the census The census is to be taken as of a certain moment- - schedule, he will explain it to them and leave it the hour of midnight between January 14 and 15. for them to fill in by the time he returns during All questions, no matter when asked, are to re- the census.5 late to that moment. Every person present in a dwelling unit on the census moment is to be list- In households where he finds able- bodied members ed, including those persons residing there tem- who do not work in a factory or office or study porarily. In addition, persons who usually full -time, but who work only in the household or reside in the unit but are temporarily absent are on their small plot of land, he is to leave a also to be enumerated. This will permit the tab - special questionnaire for completion prior to his ulation of both an actual, or on -hand, and a return at the time of the census. This question- usual population. Special procedures and forms naire is designed to obtain information on the are used to verify that a person temporarily age, sex, education, specialty or profession, and absent from his usual residence is actually list- desire for work of each such person and, for ed at the address given.6 Also, special proced- women in this category, the number of children ures will be used to enumerate the transient and and the need for their outside care. Similarly, institutional populations. in cities of 500,000 or more population and their adjoining counties, the enumerator is to leave at The population in the regions of the Far North all housholds a questionnaire designed to obtain and other areas where travel is difficult in information on the so- called "shuttle" or "pendu- January is to be enumerated in the fall of 1969. lum" migration within the urban area--that is, the age, sex, place of residence, and place of Information to be Collected work or study of all employed persons and full - time students living in the area. There are 11 questions to be asked of 100 percent of the population: On the last day of this precensus tour, and after the enumerator has checked all dwelling units in 1. Relationship to head of the family his district, the instructor is to designate, by 2. For persons who are temporarily absent, a "mechanical" method, every fourth unit on the but usually reside there: enumerator's list as those units which are to be a. reason for absence asked the sample questions. In those autonomous b. length of time absent republics and regions established for specific 3. For persons who are temporarily present: nationality groups which have a population of a. place of usual residence less than 500,000, the full set of questions will b. length of time absent from usual be asked at every household, not every fourth, so residence that information in the sample schedule can be 4. Sex obtained and tabulated for minor territorial 5. Age (as of last birthday; in months for subdivisions. infants under 1 year of age) 6. Is person married at present time? (Yes, At 8:00 a.m. an census day, Thursday, January 15, no, or widow-widower) the enumerator will begin the actual enumeration. 7. Nationality He is to visit each dwelling unit and by personal 8. Native language (also, no more than one interview complete the census schedule. All per- other language in which fluent) sons living in the apartment or house are to be 9. Education (level completed) listed, by family; thus two or more families can 10.
Recommended publications
  • SCTIW Review
    SCTIW Review Journal of the Society for Contemporary Thought and the Islamicate World ISSN: 2374-9288 February 21, 2017 David Brophy, Uyghur Nation: Reform and Revolution on the Russia-China Frontier, Harvard University Press, 2016, 386 pp., $39.95 US (hbk), ISBN 9780674660373. Since the 1980s, Western scholarship on modern Chinese history has moved away from the narrative of a tradition-bound Middle Kingdom reacting to the dynamism of Japan and the West. A “China-centered” view of modern Chinese history has by now become standard, much to the benefit of historical research.1 In more recent years, Anglophone scholarship on Central Asia has increasingly assumed a comparable orientation, combining indigenous and imperial sources to recenter modern Central Asian history around Central Asian actors. David Brophy’s Uyghur Nation: Reform and Revolution on the Russia-China Frontier, the culmination of a decade of research, represents a major advance in this regard. In a wide- ranging study, Brophy carefully reconstructs the interplay of local elites, intellectuals, community, and state from which the contemporary Uyghur nation emerged: a Uyghur- centered view of modern Uyghur history.2 On the basis of extensive archival, published, and manuscript sources, Brophy has written the fullest and most convincing account to date of the twentieth-century development of the Uyghur national concept. Synthesizing intellectual and political history, he puts persuasively to rest the frequent assertion that modern Uyghur identity was imposed from above by Soviet bureaucrats and passively adopted by its designated subjects. Brophy demonstrates that the Uyghur national idea, and the bureaucratic reification of that idea, emerged from complex negotiations between proto-Uyghur elites and intellectuals, ethnographers of various backgrounds, and Soviet officials on the local and national level.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare Reforms in Post-Soviet States: a Comparison
    WELFARE REFORMS IN POST-SOVIET STATES: A COMPARISON OF SOCIAL BENEFITS REFORM IN RUSSIA AND KAZAKHSTAN by ELENA MALTSEVA A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Elena Maltseva (2012) Welfare Reforms in Post-Soviet States: A Comparison of Social Benefits Reform in Russia and Kazakhstan Elena Maltseva Doctor of Philosophy Political Science University of Toronto (2012) Abstract: Concerned with the question of why governments display varying degrees of success in implementing social reforms, (judged by their ability to arrive at coherent policy outcomes), my dissertation aims to identify the most important factors responsible for the stagnation of social benefits reform in Russia, as opposed to its successful implementation in Kazakhstan. Given their comparable Soviet political and economic characteristics in the immediate aftermath of Communism’s disintegration, why did the implementation of social benefits reform succeed in Kazakhstan, but largely fail in Russia? I argue that although several political and institutional factors did, to a certain degree, influence the course of social benefits reform in these two countries, their success or failure was ultimately determined by the capacity of key state actors to frame the problem and form an effective policy coalition that could further the reform agenda despite various political and institutional obstacles and socioeconomic challenges. In the case of Kazakhstan, the successful implementation of the social benefits reform was a result of a bold and skillful endeavour by Kazakhstani authorities, who used the existing conditions to justify the reform initiative and achieve the reform’s original objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Russian and Soviet Censuses
    Chapter 3 A History of Russian and Soviet Censuses LEE SCHWARTZ Many of the problems associated with the use of Russian and Soviet census data, as described in later chapters in this volume, derive from the historical and political context in which the different enumerations were conducted and the state of the art of census-taking at those times. Although the earlier enumerations were less technically sophisticated and less accurate than more recent ones, the availability of published figures has been increasingly curtailed in those censuses taken just before and after World War II. The following chronological review of census-taking procedures in Russia and the USSR addresses issues such as the organization of the census-taking apparatus; the conducting of individual censuses; the completeness of the count; and some of the methodologi­ cal, statistical , and political difficulties involved in presenting the results. Analysis of results, instructions to census takers , definitional issues, and questionnaire comparisons will be dealt with here in an overall sense; the individual chapters that follow discuss these topics in more detail as they relate to the utilization of various categories of census data. In addition to works cited in this chapter, the reader may want to consult the excellent bibliographies in Lorimer (1946) and Dubester (1969). Prerevolutionary Population Counts Historical Background The earliest censuses, in Russia and throughout Europe, were conducted by feudal principalities primarily to determine the population eligible for taxation or military service and, therefore , typically left out women and children. Population counts were taken for taxation purposes in the lands of Novgorod and Kievan Rus as far back as the eighth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Peacetime Demographic Crisis
    the national bureau of asian research nbr project report | may 2010 russia’s peacetime demographic crisis: Dimensions, Causes, Implications By Nicholas Eberstadt ++ The NBR Project Report provides access to current research on special topics conducted by the world’s leading experts in Asian affairs. The views expressed in these reports are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of other NBR research associates or institutions that support NBR. The National Bureau of Asian Research is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research institution dedicated to informing and strengthening policy. NBR conducts advanced independent research on strategic, political, economic, globalization, health, and energy issues affecting U.S. relations with Asia. Drawing upon an extensive network of the world’s leading specialists and leveraging the latest technology, NBR bridges the academic, business, and policy arenas. The institution disseminates its research through briefings, publications, conferences, Congressional testimony, and email forums, and by collaborating with leading institutions worldwide. NBR also provides exceptional internship opportunities to graduate and undergraduate students for the purpose of attracting and training the next generation of Asia specialists. NBR was started in 1989 with a major grant from the Henry M. Jackson Foundation. Funding for NBR’s research and publications comes from foundations, corporations, individuals, the U.S. government, and from NBR itself. NBR does not conduct proprietary or classified research. The organization undertakes contract work for government and private-sector organizations only when NBR can maintain the right to publish findings from such work. To download issues of the NBR publications, please visit the NBR website http://www.nbr.org.
    [Show full text]
  • About Fertility Data for Russia
    HUMAN FERTILITY DATABASE DOCUMENTATION: RUSSIA Author: Evgeny Andreev New Economic School, Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Last revision: 22 October 2020 Revised by Aiva Jasilioniene Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Revised by Olga Grigorieva Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Last revised by Inna Danilova Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany E-mail: [email protected] 1 General information The collection of vital statistics in Russia began at the end of the 19th century. The annual production of tables of birth numbers by age of the mother started in 1933. The production of tables of birth numbers by age of the mother and birth order started in 1944. From 1946 onwards, the quality of these data (in terms of completeness) is considered satisfactory. The territorial coverage is described in section 2 of this report. Tables of the female population split by age and parity are available from the population censuses of 1979, 1989, 2002, and 2010. The data proprietor is the state statistical system and its central agency, the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat), online at www.gks.ru. 1.1 Data sources Rosstat has provided the HFD with a major portion of the Russian fertility data. Specifically, these are data on the following: births by age of the mother and birth order for the 1959-2018 period; monthly birth numbers for the 1956-2018 period; census data on the female population by parity and age according to the censuses of 1979, 1989, 2002, and 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Russians, Tatars and Jews by Mark Tolts
    Ethnicity, Religion and Demographic Change in Russia: Russians, Tatars and Jews by Mark Tolts [Published in: Evolution or Revolution in European Population (European Population Conference, Milano 1995), Vol. 2. Milan: EAPS and IUSSP, 1996, pp. 165-179] 1. Introduction The Russian Federation is a multiethnic country. However, during many years Russia proper was only part of an even more variegated state — first the Tsarist Empire, and then the Soviet Union, which was dissolved in 1991. Therefore demographic transition was in the past studied mostly in the framework of the USSR and ethnic factors were discussed for this larger unit as a whole. This article is the first to compare ethnicity, religion and demographic change among Russians, Tatars and Jews in Russia alone. These three groups were chosen specifically because they represent distinctive religions, as well as greatly differing ethnic backgrounds and cultures. The Russians are a Slavic people whose traditional religion is Russian Orthodox Christianity. They were for many years the dominant ethnic group of the Tsarist Empire and the Soviet Union, and now form The research for this paper was funded in part by the Memorial Foundation for Jewish Culture. Background research is being supported by the Israel Interministry Fund ‘Tokhnit Giladi’. The author wishes to express his appreciation to Sergio DellaPergola for his advice and Evgeny Andreev and Leonid Darsky for their helpful suggestions. Mark Kupovetsky, Pavel Polian and Sergei Zakharov offered some statistical data and copies of important materials. The author is grateful to Judith Even, Eli Lederhendler and Shaul Stampfer for reading and editing an earlier draft, and to Philippa Bacal for careful typing.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Three 'Nationalising' Policies in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan
    Chapter Three ‘Nationalising’ Policies in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan Nation-building processes in the post-Soviet space are strongly influenced by the duality of the state structure of the Soviet Union, accurately termed by Smith (1998: 4), ‘federal colonialism’ that contained elements of both federal and colonial systems.1 The imperial characteristics of the Soviet Union meant that the ruling elites of the non-Russian republics sought legitimacy for independence in de-colonisation and national self-determination. Thus, the new, titular-dominated leadership that emerged as dominant actors with the collapse of the Soviet Union struggled to redress Soviet and Russian legacies by upgrading the cultural, linguistic, demographic, and political status of their ethnicity, which, in the eyes of their co-ethnics, had been unjustly lowered during the years of Soviet domination. It was necessary, as in all post-colonial states in the twentieth century, to overcome ‘the legacies of empire, establishing state sovereignty in the name of the nation, and preventing a return descent from citizen to subject’ (Beissinger 1995: 172-173). For the political elites, ‘nationalisation’ was a means by which to distance themselves from the previous regime, to legitimise their own rule, and also to gain control of a fragile newly independent state. The officially declared Soviet notion of the ‘union of sovereign states,’ however, was not a complete fiction. It was under Soviet ethno-federalism that titular nationalities were provided with republics, defined as ethnic homelands, in which their languages and cultures were promoted and national elites nurtured. 1 For debates on whether the Soviet Union was an empire, what characteristics the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union had as compared to other empires, and the implications of the Soviet experience for understandings of imperialism and coloniality, see, for example, Beissinger (1995), Suny (1995), and Lieven (1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Politics, Migration and Minorities in Independent and Soviet Estonia, 1918-1998
    Universität Osnabrück Fachbereich Kultur- und Geowissenschaften Fach Geschichte Politics, Migration and Minorities in Independent and Soviet Estonia, 1918-1998 Dissertation im Fach Geschichte zur Erlangung des Grades Dr. phil. vorgelegt von Andreas Demuth Graduiertenkolleg Migration im modernen Europa Institut für Migrationsforschung und Interkulturelle Studien (IMIS) Neuer Graben 19-21 49069 Osnabrück Betreuer: Prof. Dr. Klaus J. Bade, Osnabrück Prof. Dr. Gerhard Simon, Köln Juli 2000 ANDREAS DEMUTH ii POLITICS, MIGRATION AND MINORITIES IN ESTONIA, 1918-1998 iii Table of Contents Preface...............................................................................................................................................................vi Abbreviations...................................................................................................................................................vii ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ VII 1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................3 1.1 CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES ...............................................4 1.1.1 Conceptualising Migration ..................................................................5 1.1.1.1 Socio-Historical Migration Research....................................................................................5 1.1.1.2 A Model of Migration..........................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Migration and Ethnic Diversity in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Space
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Migration and Ethnic Diversity in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Space Youngook Jang A thesis submitted to the Department of Economic History of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, September 2018 1 Declaration I, Youngook Jang, certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 42,588 words, including footnotes and tables, but excluding front matter, bibliography, and appendices. 2 Acknowledgement I have been lucky to have many people helping me finish one of the hardest challenges in my life – having Dr in front of my name. My main supervisor, Professor Chris Minns, has always been there when I sought his wise advice, which guided me in the right direction during the whole process of writing a PhD thesis. The second supervisor, Professor Oliver Volckart, has also given me useful and eye-opening comments, many of which I would not have thought up for myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity and Equality in Post-Communist Economic Transition : Evidence from Russia's Republics
    ETHNICITY AND EQUALITY IN POST-COMMUNIST ECONOMIC TRANSITION : EVIDENCE FROM RUSSIA'S REPUBLICS Donna Bahry Vanderbilt University The National Council for Eurasian and East European Researc h 910 17 th Street, N.W . Suite 300 Washington, D .C. 20006 TITLE VIII PROGRAM ProjectInformation* Principal Investigator : Donna Bahry Council Contract Number : 814-07g Date : March 18, 200t Copyright Informatio n Scholars retain the copyright on works they submit to NCEEER . However, NCEEER possesse s the right to duplicate and disseminate such products, in written and electronic form, as follows : (a) for its internal use; (b) to the U.S. Government for its internal use or for dissemination to officials o f foreign governments; and (c) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Ac t or other law or policy of the U .S. government that grants the public access to documents held by th e U.S. government. Additionally, NCEEER has a royalty-free license to distribute and disseminate papers submitte d under the terms of its agreements to the general public, in furtherance of academic research , scholarship, and the advancement of general knowledge, on a non-profit basis. All papers distributed or disseminated shall bear notice of copyright . Neither NCEEER, nor the U .S . Government, nor any recipient of a Contract product may use it for commercial sale . The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by the National Council fo r Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available by the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended) .
    [Show full text]
  • Draft—August 1995
    “RUSSIA’S TINDERBOX” Conflict in the North Caucasus And its Implications for The Future of the Russian Federation Fiona Hill September 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Background to the Report Introduction Executive Summary Section I The Structural Legacy of the USSR Section II The Crisis of National and Regional Leadership in the North Caucasus Section III The Failure of Russia’s Regional Policy Section IV Territorial Disputes in the North Caucasus Section V Chechnya Appendix 1 The Refugee Crisis in the North Caucasus Appendix 2 The Islamic Factor in the North Caucasus Bibliography Selected Works in English for Additional Reading on the North Caucasus PREFACE Background to the Report In the Summer of 1993, the Strengthening Democratic Institutions Project began an inquiry into the conflicts in Russia’s North Caucasus region, as part of a broader study of post-Soviet ethno- political conflicts. In the course of this inquiry, it became apparent that there were practically no contemporary English-language studies of the North Caucasus. Although the new Transcaucasian states of Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan were beginning to be studied more closely as a consequence of their new status as independent states after 1991, information on the Russian North Caucasus region was only available from news wires and the occasional flying visits of Western correspondents. This was in spite of the prevalence of violent conflict in the Caucasus as a whole, the involvement of North Caucasian groups in these conflicts, and Chechnya’s 1991 declaration of independence from the Russian Federation. By 1993, Azerbaijan and Armenia had been in a de facto state of war over Nagorno- Karabakh for almost five years; an armed conflict had flared between Georgia and South Ossetia sending a wave of refugees into North Ossetia in the North Caucasus; North Caucasian mercenaries were fighting on the side of Abkhazia in its war with Georgia; and a violent conflict had erupted within the North Caucasus itself between Ossetians and Ingush.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic Trends Among the Jews in the Three Post-Soviet
    Mark Tolts (Jerusalem) The Jews in the Three Post-Soviet Slavic Countries: Selected Population Trends* [Published in: W. Moskovich and L. Finberg (eds.), Jews and Slavs, Vol. 19. Jerusalem-Kiev: Hebrew University; [Ukrainian] Institute of Jewish Studies, 2008, pp. 200-208] To further the understanding of the current Jewish population trends in the three post-Soviet Slavic countries of the former Soviet Union (FSU) we have prepared new estimates of numerical dynamics. We shall study the aging of the Jewish population in the Russian Federation, Ukraine and Belarus based on the recently released results of post-Soviet censuses. Differentiations in and dynamics of higher education attainment among Jews remaining in these three FSU Slavic countries will also be examined. 1. Numerical Dynamics The numbers of Jews according to Soviet census data have been entirely dependent on the self-declaration of respondents. Conceptually, these numbers correspond to what has been defined as the “core” Jewish population (DellaPergola, 2002a). The “core” Jewish population is the aggregate of all those who, when asked, identify themselves as Jews or, in the case of children, are identified as such by their parents. It does not include persons of Jewish origin who reported another ethnicity in the census. A majority of scholars agree that Soviet census figures on Jewish ethnic nationality for adults correspond very closely with “legal” ethnic nationality as recorded in internal passports (see, e.g.: Altshuler, 1987; Gitelman, 1994). The last Soviet census was in 1989, giving us a good base against which to measure Jewish population decrease during the recent mass emigration.
    [Show full text]