DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecosystems, Their Properties, Goods and Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecosystems, Their Properties, Goods and Services 4 Ecosystems, their properties, goods and services Coordinating Lead Authors: Andreas Fischlin (Switzerland), Guy F. Midgley (South Africa) Lead Authors: Jeff Price (USA), Rik Leemans (The Netherlands), Brij Gopal (India), Carol Turley (UK), Mark Rounsevell (Belgium), Pauline Dube (Botswana), Juan Tarazona (Peru), Andrei Velichko (Russia) Contributing Authors: Julius Atlhopheng (Botswana), Martin Beniston (Switzerland), William J. Bond (South Africa), Keith Brander (ICES/Denmark/UK), Harald Bugmann (Switzerland), Terry V. Callaghan (UK), Jacqueline de Chazal (Belgium), Oagile Dikinya (Australia), Antoine Guisan (Switzerland), Dimitrios Gyalistras (Switzerland), Lesley Hughes (Australia), Barney S. Kgope (South Africa), Christian Körner (Switzerland), Wolfgang Lucht (Germany), Nick J. Lunn (Canada), Ronald P. Neilson (USA), Martin Pêcheux (France), Wilfried Thuiller (France), Rachel Warren (UK) Review Editors: Wolfgang Cramer (Germany), Sandra Myrna Diaz (Argentina) This chapter should be cited as: Fischlin, A., G.F. Midgley, J.T. Price, R. Leemans, B. Gopal, C. Turley, M.D.A. Rounsevell, O.P. Dube, J. Tarazona, A.A. Velichko, 2007: Ecosystems, their properties, goods, and services. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 211-272. Ecosystems, their properties, goods and services Chapter 4 Table of Contents .....................................................213 Box 4.4 Coral reefs: endangered by climate change?......235 Executive summary 4.4.10 Cross-biome impacts.............................................237 ........................................................214 4.1 Introduction Box 4.5 Crossing biomes: impacts of climate change 4.1.1 Ecosystem goods and services .............................215 on migratory birds ..................................................239 4.1.2 Key issues ..............................................................215 4.4.11 Global synthesis including impacts on biodiversity .............................................................239 ..........................................215 4.2 Current sensitivities 4.2.1 Climatic variability and extremes ...........................215 4.5 Costs and valuation of ecosystem goods .........................................................245 4.2.2 Other ecosystem change drivers ...........................216 and services Box 4.1 Ecological impacts of the European heatwave 4.6 Acclimation and adaptation: practices, 2003 .......................................................................217 ....................................246 options and constraints 4.6.1 Adaptation options................................................246 ..................218 4.3 Assumptions about future trends 4.6.2 Assessing the effectiveness and costs of .......219 adaptation options ................................................247 4.4 Key future impacts and vulnerabilities 4.4.1 Biogeochemical cycles and biotic feedback .........219 4.6.3 Implications for biodiversity ..................................247 4.4.2 Deserts ...................................................................222 4.6.4 Interactions with other policies and policy implications ...........................................................248 Box 4.2 Vegetation response to rainfall variability in the Sahel ................................................................224 ...248 4.7 Implications for sustainable development 4.4.3 Grasslands and savannas ......................................224 4.7.1 Ecosystems services and sustainable 4.4.4 Mediterranean ecosystems....................................226 development..........................................................248 4.4.5 Forests and woodlands..........................................227 4.7.2 Subsistence livelihoods and indigenous peoples...248 4.4.6 Tundra and Arctic/Antarctic ecosystems ...............230 ...249 Box 4.3 Polar bears - a species in peril? ..........................231 4.8 Key uncertainties and research priorities .................................................................250 4.4.7 Mountains...............................................................232 Appendix 4.1 4.4.8 Freshwater wetlands, lakes and rivers...................233 ......................................................................252 References 4.4.9 Oceans and shallow seas ......................................234 212 Chapter 4 Ecosystems, their properties, goods and services Executive summary increasingly high risk of extinction as global mean temperatures exceed a warming of 2 to 3°C above pre- industrial levels (medium confidence) [4.4.10, 4.4.11, Figure During the course of this century the resilience of many 4.4, Table 4.1]. ecosystems (their ability to adapt naturally) is likely to be Projected impacts on biodiversity are significant and of key exceeded by an unprecedented combination of change in relevance, since global losses in biodiversity are irreversible climate, associated disturbances (e.g., flooding, drought, (very high confidence) [4.4.10, 4.4.11, Figure 4.4, Table 4.1]. wildfire, insects, ocean acidification) and in other global Endemic species richness is highest where regional change drivers (especially land-use change, pollution and palaeoclimatic changes have been muted, providing over-exploitation of resources), if greenhouse gas emissions circumstantial evidence of their vulnerability to projected and other changes continue at or above current rates (high climate change (medium confidence) [4.2.1]. With global confidence). average temperature changes of 2°C above pre-industrial levels, By 2100, ecosystems will be exposed to atmospheric CO2 levels many terrestrial, freshwater and marine species (particularly substantially higher than in the past 650,000 years, and global endemics across the globe) are at a far greater risk of extinction temperatures at least among the highest of those experienced in than in the recent geological past (medium confidence) [4.4.5, the past 740,000 years (very high confidence) [4.2, 4.4.10, 4.4.11, Figure 4.4, Table 4.1]. Globally about 20% to 30% of 4.4.11; Jansen et al., 2007]. This will alter the structure, reduce species (global uncertainty range from 10% to 40%, but varying biodiversity and perturb functioning of most ecosystems, and among regional biota from as low as 1% to as high as 80%) will compromise the services they currently provide (high be at increasingly high risk of extinction, possibly by 2100, as confidence) [4.2, 4.4.1, 4.4.2-4.4.9, 4.4.10, 4.4.11, Figure 4.4, global mean temperatures exceed 2 to 3°C above pre-industrial Table 4.1]. Present and future land-use change and associated levels [4.2, 4.4.10, 4.4.11, Figure 4.4, Table 4.1]. Current landscape fragmentation are very likely to impede species’ conservation practices are generally poorly prepared to adapt to migration and thus impair natural adaptation via geographical this level of change, and effective adaptation responses are likely range shifts (very high confidence) [4.1.2, 4.2.2, 4.4.5, 4.4.10]. to be costly to implement (high confidence) [4.4.11, Table 4.1, 4.6.1]. Several major carbon stocks in terrestrial ecosystems are vulnerable to current climate change and/or land-use Substantial changes in structure and functioning of impacts and are at a high degree of risk from projected terrestrial ecosystems are very likely to occur with a global unmitigated climate and land-use changes (high warming of more than 2 to 3°C above pre-industrial levels confidence). (high confidence). Several terrestrial ecosystems individually sequester as much Between about 25% (IPCC SRES B1 emissions scenario; 3.2°C carbon as is currently in the atmosphere (very high confidence) warming) and about 40% (SRES A2 scenario; 4.4°C warming) [4.4.1, 4.4.6, 4.4.8, 4.4.10, 4.4.11]. The terrestrial biosphere is of extant ecosystems will reveal appreciable changes by 2100, likely to become a net source of carbon during the course of this with some positive impacts especially in Africa and the Southern century (medium confidence), possibly earlier than projected by Hemisphere arid regions, but extensive forest and woodland the IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR) (low confidence) [4.1, decline in mid- to high latitudes and in the tropics, associated Figure 4.2]. Methane emissions from tundra frozen loess particularly with changing disturbance regimes (especially (‘yedoma’, comprising about 500 Pg C) and permafrost through wildfire and insects) [4.4.2, 4.4.3, 4.4.5, 4.4.10, 4.4.11, (comprising about 400 Pg C) have accelerated in the past two Figure 4.3]. decades, and are likely to accelerate further (high confidence) Substantial changes in structure and functioning of marine [4.4.6]. At current anthropogenic emission rates, the ongoing and other aquatic ecosystems are very likely to occur with positive trends in the terrestrial carbon sink will peak before a mean global warming of more than 2 to 3°C above pre- mid-century, then begin diminishing, even without accounting industrial levels and the associated increased atmospheric for tropical deforestation trends and biosphere feedback, tending CO levels (high confidence). strongly towards a net carbon source before 2100, assuming 2 continued greenhouse gas emissions and land-use change trends Climate change (very high confidence)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flora of the Mediterranean Basin in the Chilean Espinales: Evidence of Colonisation
    PASTOS 2012. ISSN: 0210-1270 PASTOS, 42 (2), 137 - 160 137 FLORA OF THE MEDITERRANEAN BASIN IN THE CHILEAN ESPINALES: EVIDENCE OF COLONISATION I. MARTÍN-FORÉS1, M. A. CASADO1*, I. CASTRO2, C. OVALLE3, A. DEL POZO4, B. ACOSTA-GALLO1, L. SÁNCHEZ-JARDÓN1 AND J. M. DE MIGUEL1 1Departamento de Ecología. Facultad de Biología. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Madrid (España). 2Departamento de Ecología. Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Madrid (España). 3Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA-La Cruz. La Cruz (Chile). 4Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad de Talca. Talca (Chile). *Author for correspondence: M.A. Casado ([email protected]). SUMMARY In Chile’s Mediterranean region, over 18% of plant species are alien. This is particularly noteworthy in some agrosilvopastoral systems such as the espinales, which are functionally very similar to the Spanish dehesas and are of great ecological and socioeconomic interest. In the present paper we analyse Chile’s non-native flora, considering three scales of analysis: national, regional (the central region, presenting a Mediterranean climate) and at community level (the espinales within the central region). We compare this flora with that recorded in areas of the Iberian Peninsula with similar lithological and geomorphological characteristics, and land use. We discuss possible mechanisms that might have been operating in the floristic colonisation from the Mediterranean Basin to Chile’s Mediterranean region. Key words: Alien plants, biogeography, Chile, life cycle, Spain. INTRODUCTION Historically, the transit of goods, domestic animals and people has favoured the flow of wild organisms around the planet (Lodge et al., 2006), a fact that is often associated with the introduction of cultural systems, which have contributed to generating new environmental and socioeconomic scenarios (Le Houérou, 1981; Hobbs, 1998; Grenon and Batisse, 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Route of Colonization of Europe
    Maritime route of colonization of Europe Peristera Paschoua,1, Petros Drineasb,1, Evangelia Yannakic, Anna Razoud, Katerina Kanakid, Fotis Tsetsosa, Shanmukha Sampath Padmanabhunia, Manolis Michalodimitrakisd, Maria C. Rendae, Sonja Pavlovicf, Achilles Anagnostopoulosc, John A. Stamatoyannopoulosg, Kenneth K. Kiddh, and George Stamatoyannopoulosg,2 aDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece; bDepartment of Computer Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180; cDepartment of Hematology, George Papanicolaou Hospital, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; dDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, 711 13 Crete, Greece; eUnità di Ricerca P. Cutino, Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, 90146 Palermo, Italy; fInstitute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11010 Belgrade, Serbia; gDepartments of Medicine and Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; and hDepartment of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511 Edited* by Yuet Wai Kan, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, and approved May 9, 2014 (received for review November 7, 2013) The Neolithic populations, which colonized Europe approximately If a maritime route was used by the Neolithic farmers who settled 9,000 y ago, presumably migrated from Near East to Anatolia and Europe, their first stepping stones into Europe were the islands from there to Central Europe through Thrace and the Balkans. An of Dodecanese and Crete. The Dodecanese is very close to the alternative route would have been island hopping across the Aegean coast of Anatolia, whereas the west-most Dodecanesean Southern European coast. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed islands are very close to Crete.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Basin Ecosystem Profile Overview About CEPF
    Mediterranean Basin ecosystem profile overview about CEPF Established in 2000, the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a global leader in enabling civil society to participate in and influence the conservation of some of the world’s most critical ecosystems. CEPF is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement (AFD), Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the Government of Japan, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and the World Bank. CEPF is unique among funding mechanisms in that it focuses on high-priority biological areas rather than political boundaries and examines conservation threats on a landscape scale. From this perspective, CEPF seeks to identify and support a regional, rather than a national, approach to achieving conservation outcomes and engages a wide range of public and private institutions to address conservation needs through coordinated regional efforts. Cover photo: Coastal landscape, north coast of Menorca, Spain © Francis Abbott/npl/Minden Pictures introduction The Mediterranean Basin—which stretches across 2 million square kilometers and 34 countries, east from Portugal to Jordan, and south from northern Italy to Cape Verde—is one of 34 biodiversity hotspots identified around the globe, Earth’s most biologically rich yet threatened areas. Its status as a hotspot, as well as the unique biological, economic and cultural importance of the Mediterranean Basin, led CEPF to create a conservation strategy for the entire region. The strategy, known as the Mediterranean Basin Ecosystem Profile, will guide CEPF’s highly targeted investment in the region—$10 million, to be disbursed via grants to civil society. But the profile, which was developed through the input of more than 90 organizations based or working in the region, is much more than CEPF’s strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Mediterranean in Uncharted Waters
    EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN IN UNCHARTED WATERS EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN IN UNCHARTED WATERS Perspectives on Emerging Geopolitical Realities Perspectives on Emerging Geopolitical Realities Perspectives ISBN: 978-605-4679-18-8 EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN IN UNCHARTED WATERS Perspectives on Emerging Geopolitical Realities Edited by Prof. Michaël Tanchum Published by Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. All rights reserved. This publication reflects the views of the authors only which had the freedom to choose any terminology they wanted to express their free opinion. Konrad–Adenauer–Stiftung Derneği Türkiye Temsilciliği Ahmet Rasim Sokak No: 27 06690 Çankaya-Ankara/TÜRKİYE Tel. : +90 312 440 40 80 Faks : +90 312 440 32 48 E-mail : [email protected] Web : www.kas.de/tuerkei ISBN : 978-605-4679-18-8 Designed & Printed by: OFSET FOTOMAT +90 312 395 37 38 Ankara, 2021 5 | Preface Walter Glos 7 | Introduction Ercan Çitlioğlu 11 | The Geopolitics Of The Eastern Mediterranean Crisis: A Regional System Perspective on the Mediterranean’s New Great Game Michaël Tanchum 27 | TRNC-RoC Cooperation: A Critical Missing Piece for Eastern Mediterranean Stability Mustafa Çıraklı 38 | The Eastern Mediterranean as an Emerging Crisis Zone: Greece and Cyprus in a Volatile Regional Environment Ioannis N. Grigoriadis 47 | Turkey in an Increasingly Complex Eastern Mediterranean: How Turkey Can Defend its Interests and Alleviate its Isolation in the Region Yelda Ongun 59 | Escalating Complexity in Libya’s Ongoing Conflict Mohamed Eljarh 69 | Egypt’s Energy
    [Show full text]
  • Precipitation Changes in the Mediterranean Basin During the Holocene from Terrestrial and Marine Pollen Records: a Model–Data Comparison
    Clim. Past, 13, 249–265, 2017 www.clim-past.net/13/249/2017/ doi:10.5194/cp-13-249-2017 © Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Precipitation changes in the Mediterranean basin during the Holocene from terrestrial and marine pollen records: a model–data comparison Odile Peyron1, Nathalie Combourieu-Nebout2, David Brayshaw3, Simon Goring4, Valérie Andrieu-Ponel5, Stéphanie Desprat6,7, Will Fletcher8, Belinda Gambin9, Chryssanthi Ioakim10, Sébastien Joannin1, Ulrich Kotthoff11, Katerina Kouli12, Vincent Montade1, Jörg Pross13, Laura Sadori14, and Michel Magny15 1Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution (ISEM), Université de Montpellier, France 2UMR 7194 MNHN, Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Paris, France 3Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK 4Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA 5Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d’Ecologie marine et continentale (IMBE), Aix Marseille Université, Aix-en-Provence, France 6EPHE, PSL Research University, Laboratoire Paléoclimatologie et Paléoenvironnements Marins, Pessac, France 7University of Bordeaux, EPOC UMR5805, Pessac, France 8Geography, School of Environment, Education and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK 9Institute of Earth Systems, University of Malta, Msida, Malta 10Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration, Athens, Greece 11Center for Natural History and Institute of Geology, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany 12Department of Geology and Geoenvironment, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece 13Paleoenvironmental Dynamics Group, Institute of Earth Sciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany 14Dipartimento di Biologia Ambientale, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy 15Université de Franche-Comté, UMR6249 Chrono-Environnement, Besançon, France Correspondence to: Odile Peyron ([email protected]) Received: 16 June 2016 – Discussion started: 28 June 2016 Revised: 20 January 2017 – Accepted: 25 January 2017 – Published: 24 March 2017 Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exchange of Carbon Dioxide Between Wet Arctic Tundra and the Atmosphere at the Lena River Delta, Northern Siberia
    Biogeosciences, 4, 869–890, 2007 www.biogeosciences.net/4/869/2007/ Biogeosciences © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. The exchange of carbon dioxide between wet arctic tundra and the atmosphere at the Lena River Delta, Northern Siberia L. Kutzbach1,*, C. Wille1,*, and E.-M. Pfeiffer2 1Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Research Unit Potsdam, Telegrafenberg A43, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 2University of Hamburg, Institute of Soil Science, Allende-Platz 2, 20146 Hamburg, Germany *now at Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Institute for Botany and Landscape Ecology, Grimmer Straße 88, 17487 Greifswald, Germany Received: 23 May 2007 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 25 June 2007 Revised: 1 October 2007 – Accepted: 8 October 2007 – Published: 18 October 2007 Abstract. The exchange fluxes of carbon dioxide between piration continued at substantial rates during autumn when wet arctic polygonal tundra and the atmosphere were inves- photosynthesis had ceased and the soils were still largely un- tigated by the micrometeorological eddy covariance method. frozen. The temporal variability of the ecosystem respiration The investigation site was situated in the centre of the Lena during summer was best explained by an exponential func- River Delta in Northern Siberia (72◦220 N, 126◦300 E). The tion with surface temperature, and not soil temperature, as study region is characterized by a polar and distinctly con- the independent variable. This was explained by the ma- tinental climate, very cold and ice-rich permafrost and its jor role of the plant respiration within the CO2 balance of position at the interface between the Eurasian continent and the tundra ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • ENPI CBC Mediterranean Sea Basin Programme
    CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT (ENPI) MEDITERRANEAN SEA BASIN PROGRAMME 2007-2013 FINAL VERSION Approved by European Commission Decision n. C (2008) 4242 of August 14th 2008 ENPI/CBC-Mediterranean Sea Basin Final version Table of contents ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................ 3 PROGRAMME SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 4 1. DESCRIPTION, AIMS AND PRIORITIES................................................................................................. 8 1.1. Eligible territories and participating countries ..................................................................................... 8 1.2. Description and analysis of the geographical areas affected by the Programme ................................ 9 1.2.1. The Programme’s area of activity: socio-economic background .................................................. 9 1.2.2. The SWOT analysis ..................................................................................................................27 1.3. Coherence and complementarity with Euro-Med programmes and other strategies and programmes of different nature related to the Mediterranean area ...............................................................................30 1.3.1. Description of the Euro-Med programmes and other strategies and programmes
    [Show full text]
  • Major Biomes of the World Have You Visited Any Biomes Lately? a Biome Is a Large Ecosystem Where Plants, Animals, Insects, and P
    Major Biomes of the World Have you visited any biomes lately? A biome is a large ecosystem where plants, animals, insects, and people live in a certain type of climate. If you were in northern Alaska, you would be in a frosty biome called the Arctic tundra. If you jumped on a plane and flew to Brazil, you could be in a hot and humid biome called the tropical rainforest. The world contains many other biomes: grasslands, deserts, and mountains, to name a few. The plants and animals living in each are as different as their climates. Which is your favorite? Arctic Tundra The Arctic tundra is a cold, vast, treeless area of low, swampy plains in the far north around the Arctic Ocean. It includes the northern lands of Europe (Lapland and Scandinavia), Asia (Siberia), and North America (Alaska and Canada), as well as most of Greenland. Another type of tundra is the alpine tundra, which is a biome that exists at the tops of high mountains. Special features: This is the earth's coldest biome. Since the sun does not rise for nearly six months of the year, it is not unusual for the temperature to be below -30°F in winter. The earth of the Arctic tundra has a permanently frozen subsoil, called permafrost, which makes it impossible for trees to grow. Frozen prehistoric animal remains have been found preserved in the permafrost. In summer, a thin layer of topsoil thaws and creates many pools, lakes, and marshes, a haven for mosquitoes, midges, and blackflies. More than 100 species of migrant birds are attracted by the insect food and the safe feeding ground of the tundra.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Satellite Earth Observation for Permafrost Related Analyses—A Review
    remote sensing Review Trends in Satellite Earth Observation for Permafrost Related Analyses—A Review Marius Philipp 1,2,* , Andreas Dietz 2, Sebastian Buchelt 3 and Claudia Kuenzer 1,2 1 Department of Remote Sensing, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Wuerzburg, D-97074 Wuerzburg, Germany; [email protected] 2 German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), German Aerospace Center (DLR), Muenchner Strasse 20, D-82234 Wessling, Germany; [email protected] 3 Department of Physical Geography, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Wuerzburg, D-97074 Wuerzburg, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Climate change and associated Arctic amplification cause a degradation of permafrost which in turn has major implications for the environment. The potential turnover of frozen ground from a carbon sink to a carbon source, eroding coastlines, landslides, amplified surface deformation and endangerment of human infrastructure are some of the consequences connected with thawing permafrost. Satellite remote sensing is hereby a powerful tool to identify and monitor these features and processes on a spatially explicit, cheap, operational, long-term basis and up to circum-Arctic scale. By filtering after a selection of relevant keywords, a total of 325 articles from 30 international journals published during the last two decades were analyzed based on study location, spatio- temporal resolution of applied remote sensing data, platform, sensor combination and studied environmental focus for a comprehensive overview of past achievements, current efforts, together with future challenges and opportunities. The temporal development of publication frequency, utilized platforms/sensors and the addressed environmental topic is thereby highlighted.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Turkey)
    DOCTORAL DISSERTATION GEOHISTORY OF THE CENTRAL ANATOLIAN PLATEAU SOUTHERN MARGIN (SOUTHERN TURKEY) PhD Student: Giuditta Radeff Supervisors Co-supervisor Prof. Domenico Cosentino – Roma Tre University Taylor F. Schildgen, PhD – Potsdam University Prof. Manfred R. Strecker – Potsdam University This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License: Attribution 4.0 International To view a copy of this license visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published online at the Institutional Repository of the University of Potsdam: URL http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2014/7186/ URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-71865 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-71865 Roma Tre University – Department of Science in Cotutelle de Thèse with Potsdam University - Institute of Earth and Environmental Science Scuola Dottorale in Geologia dell’Ambiente e delle Risorse Sezione Geologia dell’Ambiente e delle Risorse Ciclo XXVI DOCTORAL DISSERTATION GEOHISTORY OF THE CENTRAL ANATOLIAN PLATEAU SOUTHERN MARGIN (SOUTHERN TURKEY) PhD Student: Giuditta Radeff Supervisors Director of the Doctoral School Prof. Domenico Cosentino – Roma Tre University Prof. Claudio Faccenna Prof. Manfred R. Strecker – Potsdam University Reviewers Dr. Gian Paolo Cavinato IGAG – CNR Co-supervisor Prof. William B. Ryan Taylor F. Schildgen, PhD – Potsdam University Columbia University To Mrs. Conci, who taught me the meaning of “important” To Mr. Christian, Mrs. Floriana and Miss Elisabeth, my idea of happiness Wann immer einen die Dinge erschreckten, sei es eine gute Idee, sie zu messen. “Die Vermessung der Welt”, Daniel Kehlmann Quando si ha paura delle cose, bisogna misurarle. “La misura del Mondo”, Daniel Kehlmann TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Profile Mediterranean Basin Biodiversity Hotspot
    Ecosystem Profile Mediterranean Basin Biodiversity Hotspot Extended Technical Summary JULY 2017 1 Table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund .................................................................................. 4 1.2 The Mediterranean Biodiversity Hotspot .................................................................................... 4 1.3 Updating the ecosystem profile .................................................................................................... 4 2. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................... 5 3. FIRST PHASE OF CEPF INVESTMENT: OVERVIEW AND LESSONS LEARNED ................ 6 3.1 Lessons learned at the portfolio level ......................................................................................... 6 3.2 Lessons learned on thematic issues ........................................................................................... 8 3.3 Lessons learned on period of investment .................................................................................. 9 4. BIOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF THE MEDITERRANEAN BASIN HOTSPOT ................................................................................................................................................. 10 4.1 Diversity and endemism ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Mediterranean Forests
    State of Mediterranean Forests 2018 State of Mediterranean Forests 2018 Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Plan Bleu, Regional Activity Center of UN Environment/Mediterranean Action Plan Rome, 2018 FAO and Plan Bleu. 2018. State of Mediterranean Forests 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome and Plan Bleu, Marseille. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or Plan Bleu pour l’Environnement et le Développement en Méditerranée (Plan Bleu) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or Plan Bleu in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or Plan Bleu. ISBN FAO: 978-92-5-131047-2 ISBN Plan Bleu: 978-2-912081-52-0 © FAO and Plan Bleu, 2018 FAO and Plan Bleu encourage the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO and Plan Bleu as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s and Plan Bleu’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.
    [Show full text]