An Analysis of Norway's Identity Representations in Peace

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Analysis of Norway's Identity Representations in Peace Natalia Duarte Neubern Peace discourse in Norwegian foreign policy: an analysis of Norway’s identity representations in peace facilitation and war engagements Dissertação de Mestrado Dissertation presented to the Programa de Pósgraduação em Informática of PUC-Rio in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Mestre em Relações Internacionais Advisor: Profa. Maíra Siman Gomes Rio de Janeiro February 2019 2 All rights reserved Natalia Duarte Neubern The author graduated in Social Communication - Journalism from Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) in 2004. She obtained a Latu Sensu Specialization in International Relations for Damásio Educacional in 2016 and attendend the Summer Course in Peace Studies by the University of Oslo (UiO) in partnership with the Peace Research Institute of Oslo (PRIO) in 2018. She served on the Defense Attaché of the Belgian Embassy in Brasilia. She currently works at the Royal Consulate General of Norway in Rio de Janeiro. Bibliographic data Neubern, Natalia Duarte Peace discourse in Norwegian foreign policy : an analysis of Norway’s identity representations in peace facilitation and war engagements / Natalia Duarte Neubern ; advisor: Maíra Siman Gomes ; co-advisor: Erica Simone Almeida Resende. – 2019. 181 f. : il. color. ; 30 cm Dissertação (mestrado)–Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais, 2019. Inclui bibliografia 1. Relações Internacionais – Teses. 2. Paz. 3. Noruega. 4. Discurso. 5. Identidade. 6. Política externa. I. Gomes, Maíra Siman. II. Resende, Erica Simone Almeida. III. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Relações Internacionais. IV. Título. CDD: 327 Inclui bibliografia 1. Relações Internacionais – Teses. 2. Paz. 3. Noruega. 4. Discurso. 5. Identidade. 6. Política externa. I. Gomes, Maíra Siman. II. Resende, Erica Simone Almeida. III. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Relações Internacionais. IV. Título. 3 To Fabro, moving power of this achievement 4 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I deeply thank Maíra Siman Gomes, who, beyond being my supervisor, has been my tightest bond to this department from the very start of my master’s degree journey. As a tutor that guides and advises my academic achievements with in-depth and inspiring problematizations, she has proved to be the perfect match to supervise me even before I ventured into this object. I appreciate that, even in between pregnancy sickness, she has had the guts to follow my prolific yet sometimes prolix lines. I hope her son Gabriel will not give her so much work as I gave to her. Maíra is, like her grandfather says, a “double-fiber” woman and an intellectual I deeply appreciate. I am truly grateful for the support of my co-supervisor, Erica Simone Resende, who granted me with core contributions on conceptual framings that guided my research along with useful literature and methods. Not least, I appreciate having had the opportunity to count on her enrichening perspectives on recent states and, most importantly, I must credit to her the insight of floating signifier to the case of Norway based on what I had written. Like she said, and like the saying goes (and with due modesty), “great minds think alike”. Erica definitely was a master mind in nailing down my object from the qualification phase. I thank Marta Fernández for her inspiring insights during my qualification, such as Norway’s institutional transparency. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES - Código de Financiamento 001 My recognition also goes to Kai Kenkel, who gave me the opportunity to learn with such a challenging teaching experience. I truly appreciate Lia Gonzalez, for all the practical support. The whole degree would not have been possible if it were not for Consul General of Norway in Rio de Janeiro Sissel Hodne Steen, who came up with a flexibilization of my work hours so that I could attend classes. I consequently thank my colleagues of the Consulate General, who understood it and adapted to our small team’s new 5 routine. I equally thank the Consulate General for the support in my learning of the Norwegian language. I owe many learnings to Peace Research Institute of Oslo and to the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. In PRIO, my especial thanks go to Kendra Dupuy and to Ida Roland Birkvad. In NUPI, I thank Morten Skumsrud Andersen and Halvard Leira for having granted me such enlightening hours of fruitful talk. I am also indebted to my “peace research gang”, my network of peace scholars around the world, especially to Hayk Smbatyan, whom I met in the International Summer School in Oslo and with whom I share not only the passion for Norway but also the interest in the concept of facilitation and identity. I equally thank my host family in Trondheim during ISFIT, and acknowledge contributions that ensued from a very insightful talk with Trine Galloway and Andrew McCain. I thank my closest Norwegian friends, for every exchange that inspired me to nail down Norway’s identity representation. My special thanks go to Helena Jaswik Tveerabak, Kine Flaaten, Tina Malén Andersen, Rolv Haakon Valle, Tore Næss, and Nancy Rotenberg. I thank my parents, Cíntia and Victor, for always having given me credence and caring. This is the most difficult expression of gratitude, as they are my two top jewels in life. Last but not least, I thank my partner Fabro Steibel, for always having encouraged me to achieve what I feared to be inconceivable. Fabro is the driving force for many of my leaps forward in the past years. Sharing life with this great man is a trustworthy source of mutual learning, support, admiration, confidence, plenitude, and growth, in a “win-win” relationship. Thank you for being “all ears” and “hands on” for this academic endeavour to become true. 6 Abstract Neubern, Natalia Duarte; Gomes, Maíra Siman (Advisor); Resende, Erica Simone Almeida (Co-advisor). Peace discourse in Norwegian foreign policy: an analysis of Norway’s identity representations in peace facilitation and war engagements. Rio de Janeiro, 2019, 181p. Dissertação de Mestrado - Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro. Historically, Norway has produced itself as a facilitator or a bridge builder between conflicting parties, thereby having achieved the ability to capitalize on the society’s belief that Norway is a ‘peace nation’. The existence of the so-called ‘Norwegian Model’ forms a paramount of a new public diplomacy, wherein domestic civil society remains both an audience and a driver of state public diplomacy efforts. At the same time, since the 1990s, Norway has increased its presence in military interventions abroad (mainly in Kosovo, in 1998, in Afghanistan, in 2001, in Iraq, in 2003, and in Libya, in 2011), an intense warfare that has not derailed the notion that other European countries are bellicose whereas Norway is constructed as peaceful. More recent articulations on the Norwegian military warfare in face of its peace identity representation reveal that Norway has achieved so much credence with its peace tradition that the country can purposively undertakes what has been called “peace trough war”. The extant literature on the evolution of the Norwegian Foreign Policy on Peace and Reconciliation unveils that peace has been an organizing concept for foreign action, being attached to defence, neutrality, engagement, development, human rights, environment, and even to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. By drawing on the work of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe (1985), this thesis discusses how, in the context of Norwegian public diplomacy efforts, “peace” has acted as a floating signifier that gives meaning and legitimizes foreign policy options such as conflict facilitations and military interventions. As a result, this thesis brackets the year of 2011 as the context of a triple “coincidence”: Norway’s conduct of preparatory facilitative talks in Colombia, the bombing of Libya and Norway’s domestic terrorist attack. With this in mind, this thesis aims to unpack and understand how Norway has represented 7 itself discursively as a “peace nation” and how peace, as a floating signifier, has allowed the country to engage in both peaceful and warful practices. Keywords Peace; Norway; discourse; identity; foreign policy. 8 Resumo Neubern, Natalia Duarte; Gomes, Maíra Siman (Orientadora); Resende, Erica Simone Almeida (Co-orientadora). Discurso de paz na política externa norueguesa: análise das representações de identidade da Noruega na facilitação de paz e nos engajamentos de guerra. Rio de Janeiro, 2019, 181p. Dissertação de Mestrado - Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro. A Noruega tem historicamente assumido o papel de facilitadora ou de intermediadora entre partes em conflito, de modo que alcançou a capacidade de capitalizar a crença, na sociedade, de que é uma "nação da paz". A existência do chamado "Modelo Norueguês" constitui uma prioridade de uma nova diplomacia pública, em que a sociedade civil doméstica continua a ser tanto audiência quanto guia dos esforços da diplomacia pública do Estado. Ao mesmo tempo, desde a década de 1990, a Noruega aumentou sua presença em intervenções militares no exterior (principalmente no Kosovo, em 1998, no Afeganistão, em 2001, no Iraque, em 2003, e na Líbia, em 2011), em um intenso ativismo militar que não pôs em xeque a noção de que outros países europeus são belicosos enquanto a Noruega é construída como pacífica. Articulações mais recentes sobre a guerra militar norueguesa em face de sua representação de identidade de paz revelam que a Noruega alcançou tamanha credibilidade graças à sua tradição de paz, que o país pode propositalmente empreender o que tem sido chamado de “guerra pela paz”. A literatura existente sobre a evolução da Política Externa Norueguesa sobre Paz e Reconciliação revela que a paz tem sido um conceito organizador para a ação externa, vinculada a defesa, neutralidade, engajamento, desenvolvimento, direitos humanos, meio ambiente e até mesmo à Organização do Tratado do Atlântico Norte.
Recommended publications
  • Kunnskapsdepartementets Historie
    1814–2014 Kunnskapsdepartementets historie KIM GUNNAR HELSVIG 1811 Det Kgl. Frederiks Universitet etableres i Christiania 1814 1. departement opprettes. 1818 1. departement skifter navn til Kirke- og undervisningsdepartementet. 1821 Stortinget etablerer Oplysningsvæsenets Fond. 1826 Første lærerseminar opprettes. 1827 Lov om allmueskolen på landet. 1845 Skoleavdelingen i Kirke- og undervisningsdepartementet får konsulentstilling. 1848 Lov om allmueskolen i byene. 1851 Hartvig Nissen etablerer Selskabet til Folkeoplysningens Fremme. 1860 Lov om allmueskolen på landet. 1865 Hartvig Nissen utnevnes til den første ekspedisjonssjefen i Kirke- og undervisnings- departementets skoleavdeling. 1869 Lov om offentlige skoler for den høyere almenndannelse innfører inndelingen i 6-årig middelskole og 3-årig gymnas. 1882 Kvinner får rett til å ta examen artium. 1884 Kvinner får adgang til universitetet og dermed rett til å ta embetseksamen. 1889 Folkeskolelovene åpnet muligheten for høyere utdannelse for alle, både i byene og på landet. 1890 Kvinner får adgang til offentlige lærerskoler. Den første normalplanen for folkeskolen. 1896 Gymnaslovene etablerte en allmenn høyere skole med to hovedlinjer, real- og engelsklinjen. 1897 Norges landbrukshøgskole opprettes. 1905 Universitetet får sin egen rektor ved Lov om Det Kgl. Frederiks Universitet. 1910 Norges tekniske høgskole opprettes. 1911 Departementet nedsetter den såkalte enhetsskolekomiteen. 1912 Kristine Bonnevie blir Norges første kvinnelige professor. 1814–1914 1922 Norges lærerhøgskole opprettes. Normalplan for landsfolkeskolen. 1925 Normalplan for byfolkeskolen. 1931 Lærerorganisasjonenes skolenemnd nedsettes. 1936 Lov om folkeskolen på landet og Lov om 1940 april Rektor ved Universitetet i Oslo Didrik Arup Seip blir sjef for Kirke- folkeskolen i kjøpstedene. og undervisningsdepartementet under Administrasjonsrådet. 1940 september Professor ved Norges tekniske høgskole Ragnar Skancke blir Kirke- og undervisningsminister i Reichskommisar Terbovens nye regjering.
    [Show full text]
  • Internasjonal Politikk [2·07]
    [2·07] politikk Internasjonal Forord: Internasjonal politikk 70 år [2·07] Internasjonal Birgitte Kjos Fonn Internasjonal Politikk i Norge. En disiplins fremvekst politikk i første halvdel av 1900-tallet Halvard Leira & Iver B. Neumann Internasjonal politikk og Forsvaret. Internasjonalisering IP-fagets norske historie og akademisering av den militære utdanningen Nina Græger IP i forsvarsutdanningen Tekst og kontekst. John Sanness om Vietnam og Afghanistan Oddbjørn Melle Tekst og tolkning hos John Sanness Da Diez de Abril kom til verden – og menneske- rettighetene kom til Diez de Abril Nye nettverk, ny internasjonal politikk Roy Krøvel Aktuelt: «Sakkyndig og objektiv oplysning – og skrevet i Internasjonal politikk 70 år en populær form» – Internasjonal politikk 70 år Birgitte Kjos Fonn Debatt: Helhetsperspektiver på norsk utenrikspolitikk Sverre Lodgaard Norske selvbilder – norsk utenrikspolitikk Halvard Leira Selvbilder med begrensninger Morten Aasland Bokspalte Nr. 2 - 2007 65. Årgang Summaries Norwegian Institute Norsk of International Utenrikspolitisk ISSN 0020-577X Affairs Institutt Internasjonal politikk [retningslinjer for manus] Artiklene bør ikke overskride 25 sider A 4, dobbel linjeavstand, eller 45 000 tegn inkludert mellomrom. Internasjonal politikk tar ikke inn bidrag som samtidig publiseres i andre Norden- baserte publikasjoner. Kun manus på norsk, dansk eller svensk mottas. Endelige bidrag leveres formatert for PC. Oppgi system og nødvendige spesifikasjoner. I. Anbefalt format for Til kildehenvisninger brukes forfatternavn
    [Show full text]
  • “Norway Is a Peace Nation”
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives “Norway is a Peace Nation” Discursive Preconditions for the Norwegian Peace Engagement Policy Øystein Haga Skånland M.A.Thesis, Peace and Conflict Studies Faculty of Social Science UNIVERSITY OF OSLO 20th June, 2008 ii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Halvard Leira for his insightful feedback, suggestions, and encouraging comments. Without him keeping me on track and gently prodding me in the right direction, carrying out the analysis would undoubtedly have been an overwhelming task. I am also grateful to Iver B. Neumann, who has read through and given valuable comments on a draft in the finishing stages of the process. I would also like to thank Prof. Jeffrey T. Checkel for an excellent introduction to social constructivism in International Relations, Prof. Werner Christie Mathisen for his course on textual analysis, and Sunniva Engh for introducing me to Norwegian development aid history. You have all inspired me in the choice of perspective and object of study. Writing this thesis would not be possible without support and encouragement to overcome the many small and big challenges I have encountered. I am indebted to my fellow students, particularly Jonathan Amario and Ruben Røsler; my friends; and my parents. Last, but not least, Synnøve deserves my most heartfelt thanks for her patience and loving support. All the viewpoints presented, and all errors and inconsistencies, are solely my own responsibility. Øystein Haga Skånland Oslo, June 2008 iii Table of Content Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Version 2.8 (Presentert DSS)
    Concentration of power in cabinets: Exploring the importance of the political context Kristoffer Kolltveit, PhD Candidate, Department of political science, University of Oslo Abstract. Weakening of the cabinet collective and strengthening of prime ministers in parliamentary democracies have often been explained by the personality of state leaders or long-term changes like increased fragmentation of public sector, internationalisation and mediatisation of politics. This article points to other, more contingent explanations for changes in the executive centre. The argument is that the number of parties in cabinet, the fragility of the coalition, and the cabinet’s parliamentary basis, also affect the need for political coordination and thus the concentration of power in cabinet. The impact of long-term societal changes on the concentration of decision-making power in cabinet thus depends on factors in the domestic political context. The argument is substantiated through a qualitative case study of Norway. Based on semi-structured interviews the study shows that different features of cabinet help explain the concentration of power seen in the last four Norwegian cabinets. ! Note to reader: This is an early draft of the final article in my article-based PhD- thesis. One of the other articles focuses on how presidentialisation tendencies in Norwegian coalitions instead might be described as concentration of power as core ministers, party leaders and parliamentary leaders still are important actors in the decision-making processes in cabinet. In order to avoid overlap, this article has a more explanatory focus. I am therefore particularly interested in and grateful for, feedback on how this present article can be framed to further strengthen the theoretical argument of the importance of short-term explanations and interlinkage with long-term explanations, and perhaps tone down the Norwegian case more.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker's Bios
    An Inclusive, Global Strategy to #LeaveNoOneBehind during and after COVID-19 Speaker’s Biographies Speaker Biography Danilo Türk President of Slovenia Danilo Türk (1952) has a BA in Law from the University of (2007-2012) Ljubljana in 1975, an MA from the University of Belgrade Club de Madrid President (1978), and a PhD from the University of Ljubljana. In 1983 he became Director of the Institute on International Law at the University of Ljubljana. He was member of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, a UN body of independent experts. In that capacity he served, in 1986- 1992, as the UN Special Rapporteur on the realisation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. In 996-1997 he also served as member of the Human Rights Committee. In 1990-1991 he took part in the drafting of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia by preparing the draft chapter of the Constitution related to human rights and fundamental freedoms. From 1992 to 2000, Mr. Türk was the first Slovene Permanent Representative to the UN in New York and represented Slovenia on the UN Security Council in 1998 - 1999. In 2000 he was invited by Mr. Kofi Annan, the then Secretary –General of the UN, to serve as UN Assistant Secretary-General for Political Affairs (2000 – 20005). In 2005 he returned to Slovenia as Vice-Dean of the Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana. In 2007 he was elected President of the Republic of Slovenia from 2007 to 2012. He became member of the Club de Madrid in 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Needs Norwegians?" Explaining the Oslo Back Channel: Norway’S Political Past in the Middle East
    Evaluation Report 9/2000 Hilde Henriksen Waage "Norwegians? Who needs Norwegians?" Explaining the Oslo Back Channel: Norway’s Political Past in the Middle East A report prepared by PRIO International Peace Research Institute, Oslo Institutt for fredsforskning Responsibility for the contents and presentation of findings and recommendations rests with the author. The views and opinions expressed in the report do not necessarily correspond with the views of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Preface In September 1998, I was commissioned by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs to carry out a preliminary study looking into Norway’s role in the Middle East. According to the agreement with the Ministry, the study should focus on the years prior to 1993 and examine whether Norway’s political past in the Middle East – and, not least, the mediating and confidence-building efforts of Norwegians prior to the opening of the secret Oslo Back Channel – had had any influence on the process that followed. The study should also try to answer the question ‘Why Norway?’ – that is, what had made Norway, of all countries, suitable for such an extraordinary task? The work on the study started on 15 September 1998. The date of submission was stipulated as 15 April 2000. This was achieved. The following report is based on recently declassified and partly still classified documents (to which I was granted access) at the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the verbatim records of the Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee, records of government proceedings and the Norwegian Parliament, Labour Party Archives, documents from the US State Department and the Socialist International – to mention the most important.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of Minority Governments
    Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design Volume 3 Article 1 10-17-2018 Taxonomy of Minority Governments Lisa La Fornara [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijcd Part of the Administrative Law Commons, American Politics Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legislation Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Rule of Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation La Fornara, Lisa (2018) "Taxonomy of Minority Governments," Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design: Vol. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijcd/vol3/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Taxonomy of Minority Governments LISA LA FORNARA INTRODUCTION A minority government in its most basic form is a government in which the party holding the most parliamentary seats still has fewer than half the seats in parliament and therefore cannot pass legislation or advance policy without support from unaffiliated parties.1 Because seats in minority parliaments are more evenly distributed amongst multiple parties, opposition parties have greater opportunity to block legislation. A minority government must therefore negotiate with external parties and adjust its policies to garner the majority of votes required to advance its initiatives.2 This paper serves as a taxonomy of minority governments in recent history and proceeds in three parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Scandinavian Journal of History, 44(4), 454-483
    Coversheet This is the accepted manuscript (post-print version) of the article. Contentwise, the accepted manuscript version is identical to the final published version, but there may be differences in typography and layout. How to cite this publication Please cite the final published version: Gram-Skjoldager, K., Ikonomou, H., & Kahlert, T. (2019). Scandinavians and the League of Nations Secretariat, 1919-1946. Scandinavian Journal of History, 44(4), 454-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2019.1566170 Publication metadata Title: Scandinavians and the League of Nations Secretariat, 1919-1946 Author(s): Karen Gram-Skjoldager, Haakon A. Ikonomou & Torsten Kahlert Journal: Scandinavian Journal of History DOI/Link: 10.1080/03468755.2019.1566170 Document version: Accepted manuscript (post-print) General Rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. If the document is published under a Creative Commons license, this applies instead of the general rights. This coversheet template is made available by AU Library Version 2.0, December 2017 Scandinavians and the League of Nations Secretariat, 1919-1946 Karen Gram-Skjoldager, Haakon A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Centre for European and Asian Studies
    Nick Sitter, PSA 2004, p.1 The Centre for European and Asian Studies REPORT 2/2004 ISSN 1500-2683 Beyond Government and Opposition? The European Question, Party Strategy and Coalition Politics in Norway Nick Sitter A publication from: Centre for European and Asian Studies at Norwegian School of Management Elias Smiths vei 15 PO Box 580 N-1302 Sandvika Norway Paper prepared for the UK Political Studies Association conference, 2004 BEYOND GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION? THE EUROPEAN QUESTION, PARTY STRATEGY AND COALITION POLITICS IN NORWAY Nick Sitter Department of Public Governance, The Norwegian School of Management BI The British application for membership of the European Economic Community in July 1961 came less than two months before the election that cost the Labour party its parliamentary majority and inaugurated four decades of minority and coalition government. Not only did the British application place the controversial question of whether to apply for EEC membership on the Norwegian Labour (and now minority) administration’s agenda, it introduced a question that has cast a shadow over coalition politics ever since. Participation in European integration has long divided both the centre-right and centre-left wings of the party system, and with the 2005 election a year and a half away it continues to do so more than ever. With the leaders of the two mainstream centre-left and -right parties both declaring that application for membership of the European Union is more important than coalition politics, and their respective potential coalition partners prioritising opposition to EU membership, the scene is set for intense coalition games and negotiations in the run-up to the 2005 elections and in all likelihood yet another minority government that builds alliances in different directions on economic and foreign policy questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Den Lange Veien Til Genéve
    81 Halldor Heidal Den lange veien til Genéve Norsk arbeiderbevegelse og ILO 1920 -1934 Denne artikkelen tar for seg norske fagorganisasjoners og de norske arbeiderpartienes holdning til Den internasjonale ar­ beidsorganisasjon (ILO) i åra 1920-1934. I Norge ble ILO i denne perioden vanligvis kalt Arbeidsbyrået i Genf etter Det internasjonale arbeidsbyrå, som er organisasjonens sekreta­ riat, og som med unntak for åra 1940-48 har holdt til i Genéve. ILO ble opprettet i april 1919 som en del av Folkeforbundet og derfor også som en del av fredsoppgjøret etter 1. verdens­ krig. Formålet med denne organisasjonen var å fremme samar­ beidet mellom landene innenfor arbeidslivet og sosialpolitik­ ken, og det viktigste virkemidlet skulle være å få i stand bindende avtaler mellom statene, konvensjoner, om slike saker som reduksjon av barnearbeid, kortere arbeidstid, sik­ kerhet og helse på arbeidsplassen, arbeidstilsyn og trygder. Dersom de forskjellige land gjennom slike avtaler forpliktet seg til å oppfylle visse minstekrav i arbeidsforhold, ville bedringen i arbeidernes kår og de økte produksjonskostnader som de mente det ville føre til, komme noenlunde samtidig i de forskjellige land. Dermed ville de land som innførte forbe­ dringer i arbeidslivet, ikke bli stilt dårligere enn andre i den internasjonale konkurransen. Internasjonal arbeiderlovgiv- ning (eller internasjonal lovgivning for arbeidslivet) var det uttrykket som ble brukt om denne formen for mellomfolkelig samarbeid. Et nytt innslag i dette samarbeidet var at repre­ sentanter for ikke-statlige organisasjoner, dvs. sammenslut­ ninger av arbeidsgivere og arbeidstakere skulle delta i den nye organisasjonen med stort sett samme rettigheter som repre­ sentantene for statsmyndighetene i medlemslandene.
    [Show full text]
  • Halvard Lange, December 11, 1956; (C-VR(56)69) Gaetano Martino
    Halvard M. Lange Born 16 September 1902. Died 19 May 1970. Educated in Oslo and in London, Lange was a professor at several universities during the 1930s, lecturing on modern and economic history. Originally a member of the Social Democrat Party, Lange became a member of the National Executive of the Labour Party in 1933, ultimately serving as the Party’s historian. During the war, Lange was arrested by the Gestapo in August 1940, released in June 1941, re-arrested in August 1942 and spent the rest of the war in concentration camps. Upon his return to Norway in 1945, he served as a full member of the Norwegian Parliament’s Nobel Committee. He was appointed Norway’s Minister of Foreign Affairs in 1946 and would remain in that office until 1965. A strong supporter of Western alignment, Lange had arguably been the most influential figure in Scandinavia pushing for both Norway and Denmark to join NATO and ultimately signing the North Atlantic Treaty on behalf of his country on 4 April 1949. “The only means of arriving at just solutions, as we see it, is through negotiation, through diplomac y…” Halvard Lange, December 11, 1956; (C-VR(56)69) Gaetano Martino Born 25 November 1900. Died 21 July 1967. A former physician and an internationally renowned Professor of Human Physiology, Martino was a distinguished member of many Italian and foreign academies and scientific societies. A Dean of the University of Messina (1943-1957) and the University of Rome (1966-1967), he devoted a significant part of his work to the issue of university education as a tool to encourage the teaching and dissemination of a European awareness.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects Regarding the Svalbard Demilitarisation in Relation to Norway Joining the Atlantic Alliance in 1949, and Reflections On
    Journal of Autonomy and Security Studies Vol. 2 Issue 2 Aspects regarding the Svalbard demilitarisation in relation to Norway joining the Atlantic Alliance in 1949, and reflections on the Åland Islands’ demilitarised and neutralised status in the event of a Finnish NATO accession Åsa Gustafsson Journal of Autonomy and Security Studies, 2(2) 2018, 10–53 URL: http://jass.ax/volume-2-issue-2-Gustafsson/ 10 Journal of Autonomy and Security Studies Vol. 2 Issue 2 Abstract The article strives to explore certain aspects regarding the Svalbard demilitarisation in relation to Norway joining the Atlantic Alliance, which could be of interest in relation to the Åland Islands’ status as demilitarised and neutralised in a situation where Finland would decide to join NATO – although the Svalbard and the Åland Islands’ legal regimes are sui generis regimes, differing for a number of fundamental reasons, as parts of a two larger regimes that differ historically, of dissimilar construction and disparate in nature. Taking a closer look at the state of the Svalbard legal regime around the time when Norway joined the Atlantic Alliance in 1949 leads to the conclusion that there were threats towards it from 1944–1947, followed by a reconfirmation of the security provisions in the Svalbard Treaty. Arguably the Åland Islands’ legal regime of today is more robust. Seemingly, the application of ‘NATO’s’ arts. 4 and 5 have so far not had any ties to Svalbard. The leeway for interpretation of treaty provisions is arguably of wider scope in the Svalbard case than in the Ålandic one. Any kind of reservation for the Svalbard status at the time of Norway joining the Atlantic Alliance was not considered.
    [Show full text]