DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Insight Profile Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Insight Profile Report 1 Local Insight profile for ‘Hampton Gay and Poyle’ area Oxfordshire Parish Profile Report Report created 20 January 2021 Finding your way around this Local Insight profile 2 Introduction Page 3 for an introduction to this report 12% of people have no qualifications in Hampton Gay and Poyle There are 198 people living in Hampton Gay and Poyle compared with 22% across England See pages 4-9 for more information on population by age and gender, ethnicity, country See pages 46-48 for more information on qualifications, pupil attainment and early years of birth, language, migration, household composition and religion Population Education & skills educational progress 7% of children are living in poverty in Hampton Gay and 31% people aged 16-74 are in full-time employment in Hampton Poyle compared with 17% across England Gay and Poyle compared with 39% across England See pages 10-23 for more information on children in poverty, people out of work, people See pages 49-55 for more information on people’s jobs, job opportunities, income and local Vulnerable groups in deprived areas, disability, pensioners and other vulnerable groups Economy businesses 0% of households lack central heating in Hampton Gay and 6% of households have no car in Hampton Gay and Poyle Poyle compared with 3% across England compared with 26% across England See pages 24-33 for more information on dwelling types, housing tenure, affordability, See pages 56-58 for more information on transport, distances services and digital services Access & transport Housing overcrowding, age of dwelling and communal establishments The % of people 'satisfied with their neighbourhood' (83.8%) is The overall crime rate is lower than the average across higher than the average across England (79.3%) England See pages 59-66 for more information on neighbourhood satisfaction, the types of Crime & safety See pages 34-35 for more information on recorded crime and crime rates Communities & environment neighbourhoods locally, local participation and the environment, air pollution 13% of people have a limiting long-term illness in Hampton Gay and Poyle compared with 18% across England Page 67 for information on the geographies used in this report, publication dates for new Appendix A See pages 36-45 for more information on limited long-term illness, life expectancy and indicators and acknowledgements. Health & wellbeing mortality, general health and healthy lifestyles Oxford Consultants for Social Inclusion (OCSI), www.ocsi.co.uk / 01273 810 270. ©OCSI 2020. This report, or any part, may be reproduced in any format or medium, provided that is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The source must be identified and the title of the publication specified with the copyright status acknowledged Introduction 3 Local Insight for Oxfordshire Parish Profile Report About the indicators Local Insight gives you access to interactive maps and reports at small area level. Information published by government as open data – appropriately visualised, analysed These reports show key social and economic indicators and allow you to compare the and interpreted – is a critical tool for Local Authorities. area selected to comparator areas. OCSI collect all local data published by more than 50 government agencies, and have OCSI identified key indicators relevant to local authorities to use in this report and the interactive webtool (local.communityinsight.org). Local Insight is a tool developed by Oxford Consultants for Social Inclusion (OCSI) based on a project developed jointly between OCSI and HACT. How we have identified the “Hampton Gay and Poyle” area OCSI develop and interpret the evidence base to help the public and community This report is based on the definition of the “Hampton Gay and Poyle” area created by organisations deliver better services. A 'spin-out' from the University of Oxford Social Oxfordshire Parish Profile Report, (you can view this area on the Local Insight map, Policy Institute, OCSI have worked with more than 100 public and community sector through finding the area on the ‘show services’ dropdown in the top left hand corner of clients at local, national and international level. See www.ocsi.co.uk for more. the map). We have aggregated data for all the neighbourhoods in “Hampton Gay and Poyle” to create the charts and tables used in this report. Alongside data for the “Hampton Gay and Poyle”, we also show data for selected comparator areas: Cherwell and England. Population: Age and gender 4 Working age Dependency Total Population Aged 0-15 Aged 65+ What information is shown here? population ratio The information on this page shows the number of people living in Hampton Gay 198 52 104 42 0.90 and Poyle. These population figures provide detail of the structure of the 50.5% male; 26.3% (England 52.5% (England 21.2% (England England average = population by broad age bands and sex. 49.5% female average = 19.2%) average = 62.4%) average = 18.4%) 0.60 Source: Mid-Year Estimates (ONS) 2019 The first information box shows the total number of people usually resident in the Figure: Population estimates by 5-year age band area, with the male female breakdown. Also shown are numbers by age, and the Source: Mid-Year Estimates (ONS) 2019 ‘dependency ratio’. This is the ratio of non-working age (those aged 0-15 and over 65) to working age population and is useful in understanding the pressure on a productive population in providing for the costs of services and benefits used by the youngest and oldest in a population. For example, a ratio of 25% would imply one person of non-working age for every four people of working age. The population pyramid compares the proportion of males and females by five- year age bands. The line chart shows how the population is changing over time in Hampton Gay and Poyle and comparator areas. The stacked bar chart, below, shows the age breakdown of the population in Hampton Gay and Poyle and comparator areas by broad age band. Figure: Population by age Figure: % change in total population from 2001-2019 Source: Mid-Year Estimates (ONS) 2019 Source: Mid-Year Estimates (ONS) Local Insight profile for Hampton Gay and Poyle © OCSI 2020. Population: Ethnicity 5 White British Non-White White-non-British Mixed What information is shown here? 126 7 8 0 The information on the right shows the number of people in Hampton Gay and 89.4% (England average = 5.0% (England average = 5.7% (England average = 0.0% (England average = Poyle by ethnicity, based on each person’s perceived ethnic group and cultural 79.8%) 14.6%) 5.7%) 2.3%) background. Households with Asian Black Other ethnic group multiple ethnicities The information boxes display the number of people who have identified themselves as White British and the number from non-White ethnic minority 7 0 0 4 groups, as well as the five broad ethnic minority groups (White non-British, 5.0% (England average = 0.0% (England average = 0.0% (England average = 7.7% (England average = Mixed, Asian, Black and other ethnic groups. 7.8%) 3.5%) 1.0%) 8.9%) Source: Census 2011 The final information box shows the proportion of households where not all Figure: Population by ethnic group (excluding White British) household members are of the same ethnicity (households with multiple ethnic Source: Census 2011 groups). The bar chart on the right shows a detailed breakdown of the percentage of people in ethnic minority groups by ethnic category. Local Insight profile for Hampton Gay and Poyle © OCSI 2020. Population: Country of birth and household language 6 With a non-UK Born in England Born Outside the UK With a UK passport What information is shown here? passport The information on the right shows the number of people in Hampton Gay and 123 13 121 5 87.2% (England average 9.2% (England average 85.8% (England average 3.5% (England average = Poyle by country of birth. = 83.5%) = 13.8%) = 75.8%) 8.8%) The top row information boxes display the number of people in Hampton Gay and All people in No household At least one adult No adults but some Poyle who were born in England and outside the UK as well as the number of households have members have (not all) has English children have English people with a UK passport and non-UK passport. English as main English as main as main language as main language language language The second row information boxes show the language breakdown of households, identifying the number of households in Hampton Gay and Poyle with one or more 50 2 0 0 96.2% (England average 3.8% (England average 0.0% (England average = 0.0% (England average = members who cannot speak English. = 90.9%) = 3.9%) 0.8%) 4.4%) The bar chart on the right shows a detailed breakdown of the percentage of people Source: Census 2011 in Hampton Gay and Poyle born outside of England by the geographic region of Figure: Population born outside England Source: Census 2011 birth. Local Insight profile for Hampton Gay and Poyle © OCSI 2020. PopuPopulation:lation: Migration 7 People who have moved address within the last 12 Overseas migrants (National Insurance no. What information is shown here? months (Census 2011) registrations of overseas nationals) (DWP 2019/20) The information box shows the number and percentage of migrants in Hampton 12 1 Gay and Poyle and across England as a whole. A migrant is defined as a person 8.5% ( average = 12.3%) 1.0% (average = 1.9%) with a different address one year before Census day. The migrant status for Figure: Level of inward and outward migration (by age) Source: Population Turnover Rates – Office for National Statistics (2010) children aged under one in households is determined by the migrant status of their ‘next of kin’ (defined as in order of preference, mother, father, sibling (with nearest age), other related person, Household Reference Person).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OCC Legal Statement Changes Post
    Changes to the Definitive Map & Statement of Public Rights of Way since 21st February 2006 Date Parish/Path Description Width Conditions & Remarks Number Limitations Abingdon Footpath 27 From North Avenue at Grid Reference SU 5029 9893 The Order confirmed Added by Modification Order 07/03/2006 100/27 between property numbers 13 and 15, 7.3.2006 provided a width confirmed 7.3.2006. south-south-westwards for approximately 133 metres 2.5 metres (min) along a strip of Common Land (Registration Number CL153), connecting with the western end of Mandeville Close at Grid Reference SU 5028 9882, to South Avenue at Grid Reference SU 5027 9880. Abingdon Footpath 28 From Colwell Drive at SU 4852 9717 leading generally 2m between SU 4852 1) Northern section added 19/02/2015 100/28 ENE for approx. 54m to SU 4857 9719, then NNW for 9717 and SU 4857 9719. by HA1980 S.38 Agreement approx. 51m and ESE to Willow Brook at SU 4856 9724.] 27.09.2001; came into effect 08.11.2004. 2) Western section added by HA1980 S.38 & 278 Agreement 15.08.2008; came into effect 23.12.2013. Abingdon Footpath 29 From the W end of Caldecott Chase at SU 49017 96473, 2 m. Added by HA1980 S.38 19/02/2015 100/29 leading N & W for approximately 22 m to Caldecott Road Agreement 05.06.2009; at SU 49007 96486. came into effect 06.01.2014. Abingdon Footpath 30 From Caldecott Chase at SU 49106 96470, leading N & E 2 m. Added by HA1980 S.38 19/02/2015 100/30 for approximately 26 m to SU 49109 96490.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Document for Planning Committee, 17/12/2015 16:00
    Committee: Planning Committee Date: Thursday 17 December 2015 Time: 4.00 pm Venue Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, OX15 4AA Membership Councillor Colin Clarke (Chairman) Councillor Fred Blackwell (Vice-Chairman) Councillor Andrew Beere Councillor Michael Gibbard Councillor Chris Heath Councillor David Hughes Councillor Russell Hurle Councillor Matt Johnstone Councillor Mike Kerford-Byrnes Councillor James Macnamara Councillor Alastair Milne Home Councillor Richard Mould Councillor Nigel Randall Councillor G A Reynolds Councillor Barry Richards Councillor Lawrie Stratford Councillor Rose Stratford Councillor Sean Woodcock Substitutes Councillor Ken Atack Councillor Carmen Griffiths Councillor Timothy Hallchurch MBE Councillor D M Pickford Councillor James Porter Councillor Sandra Rhodes Councillor Nicholas Turner Councillor Bryn Williams Councillor Barry Wood AGENDA 1. Apologies for Absence and Notification of Substitute Members 2. Declarations of Interest Members are asked to declare any interest and the nature of that interest which they may have in any of the items under consideration at this meeting Cherwell District Council, Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury, Oxfordshire, OX15 4AA www.cherwell.gov.uk 3. Requests to Address the Meeting The Chairman to report on any requests to address the meeting. 4. Urgent Business The Chairman to advise whether they have agreed to any item of urgent business being admitted to the agenda. 5. Minutes (Pages 1 - 27) To confirm as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 26 November 2015. 6. Chairman's Announcements To receive communications from the Chairman. Planning Applications 7. Land East Of Evenlode Crescent And South Of Langford Lane Kidlington (Pages 30 - 62) 14/02067/OUT 8. Land At Lince Lane With Access Off Station Road, Enslow, Kidlington, OX5 3AX (Pages 63 - 90) 15/00822/F 9.
    [Show full text]
  • 70751 064 RAF Brize Norton ACP Consultation Report Draft A-BZN
    ERROR! NO TEXT OF SPECIFIED STYLE IN DOCUMENT. RAF Brize Norton Airspace Change Proposal Consultation Feedback Report Document Details Reference Description Document Title RAF Brize Norton Airspace Change Proposal Consultation Feedback Report Document Ref 70751 064 Issue Issue 1 Date 3rd October 2018 Issue Amendment Date Issue 1 3rd October 2018 RAF Brize Norton Airspace Change Proposal | Document Details ii 70751 064 | Issue 1 Executive Summary RAF Brize Norton (BZN) would like to extend thanks to all the organisations and individuals that took the time to participate and provide feedback to the Public Consultation held between 15th December 2017 and 5th April 2018. The Ministry of Defence (MOD) is the Sponsor of a proposed change to the current arrangements and procedures in the immediate airspace surrounding the airport. As the airport operators, and operators of the current Class D Controlled Airspace (CAS), RAF Brize Norton is managing this process on behalf of the MOD. If approved, the proposed change will provide enhanced protection to aircraft on the critical stages of flight in departure and final approach, and will provide connectivity between the RAF Brize Norton Control Zone (CTR) and the UK Airways network. In addition, the Airspace Change will deliver new Instrument Flight Procedures (IFP) utilising Satellite Based Navigation which will futureproof the procedures used at the Station. As part of the Civil Aviation Authority’s (CAA) Guidance on the Application of the Airspace Change Process (Civil Aviation Publication (CAP) 725) [Reference 1], BZN is required to submit a case to the CAA to justify its proposed Airspace Change, and to undertake consultation with all relevant stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Referred to in the Oxfordshire
    KEY Map referred to in the Oxfordshire (Electoral Changes) Order 2012 ELECTORAL DIVISION BOUNDARY WARD BOUNDARY Sheet 3 of 7 PARISH BOUNDARY PARISH WARD BOUNDARY BICESTER TOWN ED ELECTORAL DIVISION NAME BICESTER NORTH WARD WARD NAME This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of BICESTER CP PARISH NAME the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Scale : 1cm = 0.08000 km Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Grid Interval 1km BICESTER WEST PARISH WARD PARISH WARD NAME The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2012. COINCIDENT BOUNDARIES ARE SHOWN AS THIN COLOURED LINES SUPERIMPOSED OVER WIDER ONES. SHEET 3, MAP 3A Electoral division boundaries in Bicester 1 2 4 4 A CAVERSFIELD CP Airfield Gliding Centre M U L L E I M CAVERSFIELD WARD N ULB ER R RY O A D D R IV E D R M A E B B U C N C BICESTER NORTH ED R R K A O N N E H L E L S (5) B R I O L A L D D R Recreation Ground L U Southwold C E County Primary R N School E S A U N V BICESTER NORTH WARD D S E E K R I N L M U Bardwell School A M N I E D N G BUCKNELL CP E BICESTER NORTH D IV D IS R R H D LIME CRESCENT L E PARISH WARD IV A N E N LA E S R W U IN B P DM U IL C L K AV N EN E U E L E V Glory Farm PLOUGHLEY ED L Bure Park I B R R Primary and Nursery R Primary School D O O W A B E School D A L (13) N L I N I N V B G R U D D E B R R A R M R Y LAUNTON WARD IV R O Y D E R S A L V O The Cooper School D E E A N I A O U D R E F D LAUNTON
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1 CALCULATIONS REQUIRED by SECTIONS 32 to 36 of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE ACT 1992 2020/21 CALCULATIONS at BAND D Tax PARISH 2020/21
    APPENDIX 1 CALCULATIONS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 32 to 36 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE ACT 1992 2020/21 CALCULATIONS AT BAND D Tax PARISH 2020/21 Base PRECEPT PARISH CHERWELL PARISH & COUNTY POLICE TOTAL 2020/21 2020/21 NEEDS NEEDS CHERWELL BAND D BAND D COUNCIL TAX £ £ £ £ £ £ £ Adderbury 1,348.7 49,880.00 36.98 133.50 170.48 1,527.44 216.28 1,914.20 Ambrosden 742.4 26,000.00 35.02 133.50 168.52 1,527.44 216.28 1,912.24 Ardley 262.2 13,052.00 49.78 133.50 183.28 1,527.44 216.28 1,927.00 Arncott 313.7 16,000.00 51.00 133.50 184.50 1,527.44 216.28 1,928.22 Banbury 15,799.3 1,929,411.00 122.12 133.50 255.62 1,527.44 216.28 1,999.34 Barford 266.3 9,750.00 36.61 133.50 170.11 1,527.44 216.28 1,913.83 Begbroke 359.1 28,181.50 78.48 133.50 211.98 1,527.44 216.28 1,955.70 Bicester 12,110.6 1,566,506.00 129.35 133.50 262.85 1,527.44 216.28 2,006.57 Blackthorn 207.1 11,829.00 57.12 133.50 190.62 1,527.44 216.28 1,934.34 Bletchingdon 376.8 22,000.00 58.39 133.50 191.89 1,527.44 216.28 1,935.61 Bloxham 1,557.1 £96,676.00 62.09 133.50 195.59 1,527.44 216.28 1,939.31 Bodicote 962.9 33,702.00 35.00 133.50 168.50 1,527.44 216.28 1,912.22 Bourton 340.3 12,200.00 35.85 133.50 169.35 1,527.44 216.28 1,913.07 Broughton 123.4 5,569.73 45.14 133.50 178.64 1,527.44 216.28 1,922.36 Bucknell 107.9 5,545.00 51.39 133.50 184.89 1,527.44 216.28 1,928.61 Caversfield 557.0 6,200.00 11.13 133.50 144.63 1,527.44 216.28 1,888.35 Charlton on Otmoor 203.7 9,300.00 45.66 133.50 179.16 1,527.44 216.28 1,922.88 Chesterton 449.8 28,000.00 62.25 133.50 195.75 1,527.44 216.28
    [Show full text]
  • Oxfordshire's Public Rights of Way Network – Assessment of Connectivity
    Appendix E Oxfordshire’s public rights of way network – assessment of connectivity As part of work to achieve the aims of the first Oxfordshire Rights of Way Improvement Plan, the public rights of way network was assessed using a Geographical Information System (GIS) by Exegesis Spatial Data Management Ltd. This has enabled the production of graphics and tables to show the relative connectivity at the settlement level and for each kilometre square across the county. The graphics are colour coded for ease of reference and simple comparison. Shades of green are areas better connected, whilst areas shaded red are more poorly served. Tables accompany the graphics and include the mean average connected network in each of the settlement size categories. The connectivity study was not able to take account of the other access resources that are available to the public, including access land, neighbouring counties’ rights of way networks, the minor and unsurfaced road network, cycletracks, permissive paths under stewardship agreements, nature reserves, Woodland Trust and National Trust accessible land, and areas made available under Inheritance Tax exemptions -so these should be considered as part of any detailed assessments. In addition, the public rights of way network has been assessed for its ‘disjunctions’ – points where public rights of way meet roads and other barriers – and where there is not a close connection on the opposite side of that road. Some of these match with suggestions submitted as part of the Rights of Way Improvement Plan production. The study is not definitive and there may be other disjointed routes that are not indicated or indicated in error.
    [Show full text]
  • 1265088 Cherwell DC Planning X56 (7Pt)
    CHERWELL DISTRICT COUNCIL TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACTS APPLICATIONS THAT REQUIRE STATUTORY ADVERTISEMENT 18/00182/F – Hampton GayAnd Poyle – Manor Farm Church Lane Hampton Poyle Erection of new garden room for Mr Harry Kerwood * 18/00183/LB – Hampton Gay And Poyle – Manor Farm Church Lane Hampton Poyle Erection of new garden room. for Mr Harry Kerwood 18/00323/F – Kirtlington – North Green Cottage North Green Kirtlington Amendments to application 17/00229/F – To alter the pitch of the roof, raising the ridge slightly matching the adjoining property on the east elevation, making it more in character with the majority of the properties within this conservation village. Altering the size of the window on the south elevation to match the adjoining bedroom window of our existing property. for Mrs Charlotte Gemma Queralt * 18/00321/F – Bicester – Land At Lakeview Drive And Oxford Road Bicester Installation of an external bin store for McDonald’s Restaurants Ltd *These are householder applications: any appeal in writing against refusal for planning permission will be sent to the Secretary of State, after which you won’t be able to comment further. Full details of these applications may be inspected during normal office hours at the Council Offices, or at http:// www.publicaccess.cherwell.gov.uk/online-applications/. Alternatively relevant applications have been sent to the respective Clerks to the Parish Councils or Meetings. Representation on applications should be sent within 21 days of the date of this publication to the Head of Public Protection and Development Management, Bodicote House, Bodicote, Banbury OX15 4AA. Any representations received cannot be treated as confidential in view of the provisions of the Local Government (Access to Information)Act, 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Yarnton
    Welcome to Yarnton Foreword This booklet is supplied by Yarnton Parish Council as a general guide and a means of providing helpful information for newcomers to the village. Included in the directory section are the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the Parish Councillors and Clerk, Local Organisations and Voluntary Societies and details of amenities available. Although the village is physically divided into the old and the new, in spirit it is a well- integrated community; so, whilst the experience and knowledge of our longer-standing residents are much valued, any new arrival is always welcomed, and it is hoped that the information contained in this booklet will be of use in helping new parishioners to settle speedily and happily in the village, so please don‟t hesitate to contact any of the Councillors or organisations listed. Yarnton Parish Council Spring 2004 The armorial crest on the cover is that of the ALDERMAN WILLIAM FLETCHER of Oxford, one of Yarnton‟s outstanding benefactors. He built the Clerk‟s House on the corner of Church Lane. This was our first School House: that is why our modern Primary School is named after him. He endowed our Church with many valuable works of art and the chief parish charities were founded by the Alderman and other members of his family. The 2004 edition of Welcome to Yarnton was revised and updated by Yarnton WI with funding from Awards For All and was delivered to every household in the village by WI members as their Community Challenge project for 2003 –2004. This 2010 edition was also updated by the WI.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Residents
    Local resident submissions to the Cherwell District Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from local residents. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Cherwell District Personal Details: Name: bill burles E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I would rather south newington was part of west oxford not cherwell. Quite frankly i dont see why we need a district council at all. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4343 18/12/2014 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Cherwell District Personal Details: Name: Janet Doherty E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Member of the public Comment text: When I moved to Bicester 20 plus years Caversfield stood way out from Bicester. I moved to Caversfield over 15 years ago. I loved the fact there was no pub, no shop and that it was rural and unspoilt. But over the years we have been subjected to more and more planning applications all around us. All of them would have swallowed Caversfield up. It is bad enough the post office will not allow Caversfield to be included in our addresses. Now by just becoming North Bicester our identity will be totally lost and it is only a matter of time before Caversfield is lost to development and our village with it.
    [Show full text]
  • Cherwell District Council
    CHERWELL DISTRICT COUNCIL TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACTS APPLICATIONS THAT REQUIRE STATUTORY ADVERTISEMENT 16/02236/F - Hampton Gay And Poyle - Model Farm 19 Bletchingdon Road Hampton Poyle Demolition of Dutch barn and re-erection of the same building with associated hardstanding on alternative site at Model Farm for Mr J Brewer 16/01806/LB - Launton - Bicester Heritage Buckingham Road Bicester Physical works to buildings 79, 103, 108, 113, 123, 129, 130,131, 135 and 137 to enable restoration and conversion to commercial use. for Bicester Heritage 16/02269/HYBRID - Ardley With Fewcott - Land At Southern Bomb Stores Chilgrove Drive Upper Heyford OUTLINE planning permission for the demolition of the western part of the Southern Bomb Store and the associated structures and site clearance, with the subsequent construction of employment development (Use Classes B1a up to 2,650m2, B1b/c up to 10,550m2 and B8 up to 9,900m2 net) and associated buildings/ structures with the associated internal access roads, pedestrian/bridleway linkages, service areas and parking, utilities and infrastructure, landscaping and associated other works. FULL planning permission for the redevelopment of Chilgrove Drive and its junction with Camp Road (west and south) and the unnamed road (east) to the B430, the associated pedestrian/bridleway and other associated works for Upper Heyford LP 16/02126/LB - Launton - Yew Tree Farm Station Road Launton Alterations to listed building, new driveway and driveway fence for Ms Catherine Hall 16/01805/F - Launton - Bicester Heritage Buckingham Road Bicester Change of use of buildings from sui generis MOD use to various commercial uses as detailed in accompanying Planning Statement with associated physical works and demolition of buildings 101 and 104 and erection of replacement structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxfordshire Digital Infrastructure Strategy and Delivery Plan
    Oxfordshire Digital Infrastructure Strategy and Delivery Plan JANUARY 2020 – V11 Bower, Craig – COMMUNITIES | [email protected] Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 2 Vision ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Superfast Broadband ............................................................................................................................ 6 Commercial Operators in Oxfordshire ........................................................................................... 6 BT Plc - Openreach ...................................................................................................................... 6 Virgin Media .................................................................................................................................. 6 Gigaclear Plc ................................................................................................................................. 7 Airband .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Hyperoptic ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Open Fibre Networks Ltd (OFNL) ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HWRC Consultation Summary
    Annex 2 Detailed Analysis of the consultation responses received: Below the responses received for each question asked are presented. Not all respondents chose to answer all questions. Where there was space for respondents to add a comment the key themes have been summarised. OCCs response to the main concerns and comments raised are detailed in the main body of the report. Question 1: What are your views on our proposals for reducing the overall number of HWRCs in Oxfordshire in order to meet a required 30 per cent reduction in the HWRC operating budget by 2017/18? Response Percentage of respondents Support 8% Oppose 91% Don‟t know 3% Key themes (2241 comments made) Those who supported the proposals did so in acknowledgement that savings needed to be made and they believed that OCC has investigated all of the options. A number of residents said that they would support the proposals as long as their local site was kept open. Some residents reminded OCC of the need to ensure that kerbside services would need to be maintained and that remaining sites would need to be able to cope with the increased and varied usage. Those who opposed the proposals felt that they would lead to an increase in fly-tipping and that the extra journey time was unacceptable; that this would be a disincentive to recycle and bad for the environment. They felt that the remaining sites would become overcrowded and difficult to use and that the population growth in their area was not being adequately catered for. Overall a number of respondents felt that the proposals would increase costs for the council.
    [Show full text]