Altermodern: a Conversation More Links with Nicolas Bourriaud

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Altermodern: a Conversation More Links with Nicolas Bourriaud NEWS & FEATURES EXHIBITIONS MAGAZINE NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIBE !Search !Facebook INTERVIEWS MAR. 17, 2009 !Twitter ! Altermodern: A Conversation More Links with Nicolas Bourriaud by Bartholomew Ryan Independent curator and critic Bartholomew Ryan interviews Nicholas Bourriaud, author of the seminal book Relational Aesthetics and curator of the fourth Tate Triennial, Altermodern, which remains on view in London at the Tate Britain through April 2009. BR: What is the 'Altermodern?' NB: First, it is an attempt to reexamine our present, by replacing one periodizing tool with another. After 30 years into the ‘aftershock’ of modernism and its mourning, then into the necessary post-colonial reexamination of our cultural frames, ‘Altermodern’ is a word that intends to define the specific modernity according to the specific context we live in – globalization, and its economic, political and cultural conditions. The use of the prefix “alter” means that the historical period defined by postmodernism is coming to an end, and alludes to the local struggles against standardization. The core of this new modernity is, according to me, the experience of wandering — ADVERTISEMENT in time, space and mediums. But the definition is far from being complete. BR: You suggest in the Altermodern Manifesto that multiculturism and identity are being overtaken by ‘creolization’, that artists start from a “global state of culture”. This terminology could be said to describe only a new cosmopolitanism that is accessible to relatively few. How would you respond to this? NB: I had a discussion about it with Pascale Marthine Tayou, born in http://www.artinamericamagazine.com/news-features/interviews/altermodern-a-conversation-with-nicolas-bourriaud/ 30/03/2016, 11:27 AM Page 1 of 7 Cameroon and living in Belgium, whose work in the triennial reflects this cultural shift from the point of view of his native culture. For him, this ‘globalised state of culture’ is already a matter of fact: in every spot of the planet, you can see this new cultural stratus, coexisting with the layer of traditional culture and some local specific contemporary elements. Saying that it is the privilege of the artistic jet set is a pure denial of the worldwide violence of the capitalist system, or an extreme naiveness. I think that this theoretical resistance, which consists in sticking to the multiculturalist dogma, is hiding a paternalist pattern : it jails the individuals into their so-called ‘origins’ and their ‘identities’. Let’s face it: artists now have access to information, and they all use the same toolbox, from Stockholm to Bangkok. Or shouldn’t they? We have to get out of this dialectical loop between the global and the local, to get rid of the binary opposition between globalization and traditions. And what is the name of this third way? Modernity, whose historical ambiguity is directed against both standardization and nostalgia. BR: Were the artists in the triennial finalized after you had developed the concept, or were they chosen in part because they helped resolve some of your thinking around the concept? NB: I started to elaborate the concept with a series of lectures given in various places, like Bangkok, Sydney or Buenos Aires, in order to develop it through discussions with other artists, critics or curators. The idea of centering the triennial on this theme was an early choice, but the problem was to select artists at the same time than I was inventing the selection criterions… Hence, the process was really experimental: as curators, we are more used to define the exhibition frame, and then choose the artists. Here, it was like improvising an opera: my libretto had to be completed while the singers were already on stage. And, of course, the idea developed since the opening. Altermodern is not an exhibition that illustrates a theory, but a process of collective thinking. You can read my subtitles, but also concentrate on the artists’ voices. BR: What prompted the decision to have non Britain-based artists for the first time in a Tate Triennial? NB: With such a theme, it would have been absurd to curate a ‘national’ show. Those exhibitions are more and more absurd, as the fact that you are born here or there does not necessarily determine your frame of mind anymore. I am more interested in artists who produce singular itineraries within the different streams of knowledge, than in those who insist on ‘representing’ their cultures. The exhibition is more about London than from London: and http://www.artinamericamagazine.com/news-features/interviews/altermodern-a-conversation-with-nicolas-bourriaud/ 30/03/2016, 11:27 AM Page 2 of 7 ‘passers-by’ are part of a city at any given time, as far as I know. BR: I am interested in the presence of Gustave Metzger in the exhibition. Amongst other things, he is the founder of Destructivist art. Is his work in some way an antecedent to the phenomena you wish to describe? NB: Already in the 1960’s, Gustav Metzger developed the notion of sustainable development, and his work dealt in a very powerful way with the notion of destruction. Metzger is the father figure in Altermodern -- his work is actually located in the exact center of the space -- because very early, he moved away from modernism, whose central patterns were the explosion, the energy spill and the fragmentation of representations. BR: If the Altermodern is a new paradigm, did it change your approach to exhibition making? I am interested in how you approach space and material concerns – it is something I think you rarely get asked about though I have noticed some positive reviews relating to the installation. NB: Thank you for asking this. I tend to think that the spatial organization of an exhibition has to be directed towards a specific effect, and has to be articulated in order to make a certain pattern appear. Here, it was a certain feeling: scattered or fragmented forms, archipelago-like, and the impression of a journey. One critic from a London newspaper wrote that he had the same feeling visiting the show as when browsing on his computer: he summed up what I tried to provide to the visitor. More concretely, I tried to organize the exhibition as a maze, with many pathways leading to smaller rooms, and a general plan in the form of a snail, that comes from and leads to the spacious Duveens’ Hall of the Tate Britain. BR: Your first book, Relational Aesthetics, collected essays and written responses to tendencies in art that you were approaching in your curatorial work in the 90's. You were not writing with the benefit and safety of hindsight. Published in French in 1998, and in English in 2002, when it arrived in the U.S. it was approached as if your claims for an aesthetics that judged art works on the basis of 'the inter-human relationships they produced' had just been invented. The vulnerability of 'responding in the present' was rarely acknowledged. American academics largely aligned against the book, declaring your claims for the political potential of the work were overstated. Would you agree with my account of the book's reception in the U.S.? Do http://www.artinamericamagazine.com/news-features/interviews/altermodern-a-conversation-with-nicolas-bourriaud/ 30/03/2016, 11:27 AM Page 3 of 7 you look back on Relational Aesthetics as a necessarily flawed project that usefully began the mapping of a new paradigm? NB: When I published the first text of what was to become Relational Aesthetics, in 1995, I was trying to portray a generation. As an observer of the works of about twenty artists who were loosely working together regularly, I discerned that the common denominator in their practices (as heterogeneous in style as they may be) was found in their link with the relational sphere. They all were working within the inter-human in all of its dimensions. It was the theme of my exhibition Traffic, in January 1996, gathering artists like Maurizio Cattelan, Liam Gillick, Pierre Huyghe, Gabriel Orozco, Jason Rhoades, Angela Bulloch, and so on. So, what I termed “relational aesthetics” was based on a typology comprising a large number of stylistic elements and extremely diverse attitudes, from Tiravanija's ephemeral models of sociality to Liam Gillick's combination of narratives and structures, via Beecroft's cold human landscapes or Cattelan's manipulative ‘slapstick’ spirit. I have no idea why some critics picked “participation” in it: maybe that is what they were able to understand, because they already knew it from 1960’s art history books. In general terms, I try to understand and explain what I see emerging, not to produce afterthoughts and theorize what has already happened… Altermodern goes into the same (difficult) direction. I only hope that my thesis will be heard “live” this time, not with a 10-year delay that generates misunderstandings. BR: Postproduction, your second book, seemed to refine and expand claims made in the first. Missing was the degree of faith in the potential of ideas such as “conviviality”. Yet it retained a sense, clear within Relational Aesthetics, that art had entered a new paradigm, (fueled in part by the Internet). A realm where the older tensions that had been used to measure value and quality, ones linked to Modernism and certain notions of criticality bound up in the Culture Industry (via Adorno) and Spectacle (via Debord) had to be abandoned. Rather than fret about the relative merits and demerits of given 'appropriation' strategies, it famously describes a cultural landscape positioned between the twin polls of the programmer and DJ, both of whom have the task (like the contemporary artist) of "selecting cultural objects and inserting them into new concepts." How does your new book The Radicant take up Postproduction's claims, or does it represent a break from previous thinking? NB: As I said, conviviality was part of the typology I proposed in Relational Aesthetics, not the center of the book – again, it is not an essay about “participation”, which is only one of the elements I gathered then.
Recommended publications
  • Participatory Art
    ENCYCLOPEDIA OF AESTHETICS, Michael Kelly, Editor-in-Chief (Oxford University Press, 2014) Participatory Art. In recent decades, contemporary visual and performance art created through a participatory process has drawn increasing attention. Its value is the subject of considerable debate, including a lively conversation around the ethics and aesthetics of the practice as well as the vocabulary best suited to describe and critique it. Participatory art exists under a variety of overlapping headings, including interactive, relational, cooperative, activist, dialogical, and community-based art. In some cases, participation by a range of people creates an artwork, in others the participatory action is itself described as the art. So the conceptual photographer Wendy Ewald gave cameras and photography training to a group of children in a village in India, who, in turn, depicted their community, and the resulting photography show was considered participatory art. On the other hand, the multimedia visual artist Pedro Lasch collaborated with a group of “Sonidero” DJ’s on a party at an art center in Mexico City, and he called the social interactions leading to, and including, the public event an artwork co-authored by a range of participants—including the people who simply showed up for the event. Click to view larger Tatlin’s Whisper #5, 2008 (mounted police, crowd control techniques, audience), Tania Bruguera. Photo by Sheila Burnett. courtesy of tate modern Of course participation in the collective creation of art is not new. Across the globe, throughout recorded history people have participated in the creation of art—from traditional music and dance to community festivals to mural arts.
    [Show full text]
  • TA 4.3 00 FM.Qxd
    TA 4.3_01_art_Smith.qxd 12/8/06 10:59 AM Page 169 Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research Volume 4 Number 3. © Intellect Ltd 2006. Article. English language. doi: 10.1386/tear.4.3.169/1 Art games: Interactivity and the embodied gaze Graham Coulter-Smith Southampton Solent University Elizabeth Coulter-Smith Staffordshire University Abstract Keywords One of the most salient differences between fine art and new media art lies in art games the possibility for interactivity. Interactivity is not simply an inherent quality of art into life new media, it also relates to a crucial ethico-aesthetic premise informing decon- creativity structive art from Dada and Surrealism through radical art of the 1960s and installation art 1970s and into the present. The ethico-aesthetic premise in question concerns interactive art breaking down the barrier between the viewer and the work of art and bringing relational aesthetics art into life. More specifically the goal is to bring creativity into everyday life as an antidote to alienation and reification. Whereas new media art finds it rela- tively easy to devise art games that encourage creative involvement on the part of the viewer, fine art is severely hindered in its attempts in this direction by the traditional focus on the artist-genius and the transformation of the artistic prod- uct (whatever its material) into a precious object. It will be shown that creative games exist in fine art but they are for the most part designed by the artist for the artist. This is even the case with the most radical fine artists celebrated at the turn of the millennium such as Rirkrit Tiravanija who Nicolas Bourriaud put forward as a prime instance of so-called relational aesthetics.
    [Show full text]
  • C O L L E C T I O N B O
    THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA ART CONTEMPORARY T HE COLLECTION BOOK y �� THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA ART CONTEMPORARY ��THE T H E COLLECTIONCOllECtIoN BOOK y BOOK VERLAG DER BUCHHANDLUNG WALTHER KÖNIG, KÖLN 4 5 CONTENTS 6 Acknowledgments by FRANCESCA VON HABSBURG 01 02 03 04 t t t t 10 WAYS BEYOND 72 DIE OR PERFORM 280 T H E A L E P H 354 PRESERVATION OBJECTS by ANDREAS SCHLAEGEL P O T E N T I A L AND REANIMATION FRANCESCA VON HABSBURG by ELKE KRASNY THROUGH in conversation with 88 MONICA BONVICINI CONTEMPORARY ART HANS ULRICH OBRIST 92 CANDICE BREITZ 288 PARADOXES OF AND ARCHITECTURE 97 JANET CARDIFF COLLECTING 22 AI WEIWEI 107 MAURIZIO CATTELAN FRANCESCA VON HABSBURG 361 MONUMENTAL 28 DOUG AITKEN 110 CHEN QUILIN in conversation with by MARK WIGLEY 34 DARREN ALMOND 116 ANETTA MONA CHISA & PETER PAKESCH 40 KUTLUĞ ATAMAN LUCIA TKÁČOVÁ 366 JULIAN ROSEFELDT 52 FIONA BANNER 120 CYBERMOHOLLA HUB 292 RIVANE NEUENSCHWANDER 376 THOMAS RUFF 56 JOHN BOCK 125 EMANUEL DANESCH & 298 JUN NGUYEN-HATSUSHIBA 378 RITU SARIN & DAVID RYCH 302 CARSTEN NICOLAI TENZING SONAM 129 DON’T TRUST ANYONE 308 OLAF NICOLAI 383 HANS SCHABUS OVER THIRTY 314 PAUL PFEIFFER 390 CHRISTOPH SCHLINGENSIEF 138 OLAFUR ELIASSON 320 WALID RAAD / 398 GREGOR SCHNEIDER 152 ELMGREEN & DRAGSET THE ATLAS GROUP 406 ALLAN SEKULA 160 MARIO GARCÍA TORRES 330 RAQS MEDIA COLLECTIVE 414 NEDKO SOLAKOV 164 ISA GENZKEN 336 JASON RHOADES 419 MONIKA SOSNOWSKA 168 DOUGLAS GORDON 340 PIPILOTTI RIST 422 THOMAS STRUTH 172 FLORIAN HECKER 344 MATTHEW RITCHIE 426 DO HO SUH 176 CARSTEN HÖLLER 430 CATHERINE SULLIVAN 181 TERESA
    [Show full text]
  • Gianni Motti
    TRANSFERT Publisher TRANSFERT Editor MARC-OLIVIER WAHLER ART DANS L’ESPACE URBAIN KUNST IM URBANEN RAUM ART IN URBAN SPACE No 10 ESS Biel-Bienne CH 17 06 - 31 08 2000 «I LOOKEDATTHE CITY AND I SAW NOTHING» -F DE 8 INTRODUCTION (F) 28 MARC-OLIVIER WAHLER 176 MARC-OLIVIER WAHLER 320 MARC-OLIVIER WAHLER 14 EINFÜHRUNG (D) “J’AI REGARDÉ VERS LA VILLE “ICH SCHAUTE AUF DIE STADT “I LOOKED AT THE CITY AND ET JE N’AI RIEN VU” UND SAH NICHTS” I SAW NOTHING” 20 INTRODUCTION (E) 36 JOSHUA DECTER 184 JOSHUA DECTER 328 JOSHUA DECTER COMMUNICATION-VILLE KOMMUNIKATION STADT COMMUNICATION CITY 46 JEAN-CHARLES MASSÉRA 194 JEAN-CHARLES MASSÉRA 338 JEAN-CHARLES MASSÉRA PUISSE LE PROCESSUS GLOBAL MÖGE DER GLOBALE AKKUMULATIONS- MAY THE GLOBAL PROCESS OF D’ACCUMULATION TREMBLER PROZESS VOR EINER REVOLUTION DER ACCUMULATION TREMBLE AT THE À L’IDÉE D’UNE RÉVOLUTION DES BENUTZER ERZITTERN (MANIFEST FÜR IDEA OF A USERS’ REVOLUTION USAGERS (MANIFESTE POUR DIE (MANIFESTO FOR CONSCIOUSNESS LA CONSCIENTISATION DE LA BEWUSSTMACHUNG DES DEVELOPMENT ABOUT THE USER CONDITION USAGÈRE) BENUTZERDASEINS) CONDITION) 60 OLIVIER MOSSET 208 OLIVIER MOSSET 350 OLIVIER MOSSET INFORMATION TRANSFER INFORMATION TRANSFER INFORMATION TRANSFER 66 MARTIN CONRADS 214 MARTIN CONRADS 356 MARTIN CONRADS COLORIS GLOCAL “GLOKALKOLORIT” GLOCAL COLOR 74 FRANK PERRIN 222 FRANK PERRIN 364 FRANK PERRIN LE JOGGER, HÉROS DE LA VIE DER JOGGER, HELD DES THE JOGGER, HERO OF POSTMODERNE POSTMODERNEN LEBENS POSTMODERN LIFE 82 LORI HERSBERGER 230 OLIVIER BLANCKART 372 PETER LAND 88 OLIVIER MOSSET 236 JONATHAN
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 2009
    NEWSLETTER 2009 NEWSLETTER CONTENTS 2 Letter from the Chair and President, Board of Trustees Skowhegan, an intensive 3 Letter from the Chair, Board of Governors nine-week summer 4 Trustee Spotlight: Ann Gund residency program for 7 Governor Spotlight: David Reed 11 Alumni Remember Skowhegan emerging visual artists, 14 Letters from the Executive Directors seeks each year to bring 16 Campus Connection 18 2009 Awards Dinner together a gifted and 20 2010 Faculty diverse group of individuals 26 Skowhegan Council & Alliance 28 Alumni News to create the most stimulating and rigorous environment possible for a concentrated period of artistic creation, interaction, and growth. FROM THE CHAIR & PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS ANN L. GUND Chair / GREGORY K. PALM President BYRON KIM (’86) We write to you following another wonderful Trustees’/ featuring a talk by the artist and in June for a visit leadership. We will miss her, but know she will bring Many years ago, the founders of the Skowhegan great food for thought as we think about the shape a Governors’ Weekend on Skowhegan’s Maine campus, to Skowhegan Trustee George Ahl’s eclectic and her wisdom and experience to bear in the New York School of Painting & Sculpture formed two distinct new media lab should take. where we always welcome the opportunity to see beautiful collection which includes several Skowhegan Arts Program of Ohio Wesleyan University, where governing bodies that have worked strongly together to As with our participants, we are committed to diversity the School’s program in action and to meet the artists.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicolas Bourriaud POSTPRODUCTION CULTURE AS
    Nicolas Bourriaud POSTPRODUCTION CULTURE AS SCREENPLAY: HOW ART REPROGRAMS THE WORLD Lukas & Sternberg, New York, 2002. INTRODUCTION IT'S SIMPLE, PEOPLE PRODUCE WORKS, AND WE DO WHAT WE CAN WITH THEM, WE USE THEM FOR OURSELVES. (SERGE DANEY) Postproduction is a technical term from the audiovisual vocabulary used in television, film, and video. It refers to the set of processes applied to recorded material: montage, the inclusion of other visual or audio sources, subtitling, voice-overs, and special effects. As a set of activities linked to the service industry and recycling, postproduction belongs to the tertiary sector, as opposed to the industrial or agricultural sector, i.e., the production of raw materials. Since the early nineties, an ever increasing number of artworks have been created on the basis of preexisting works; more and more artists interpret, reproduce, re-exhibit, or use works made by others or available cultural products. This art of postproduction seems to respond to the proliferating chaos of global culture in the information age, which is characterized by an increase in the supply of works and the art world's annexation of forms ignored or disdained until now. These artists who insert their own work into that of others contribute to the eradication of the traditional distinction between production and consumption, creation and copy, readymade and original work. The material they manipulate is no longer primary. It is no longer a matter of elaborating a form on the basis of a raw material but working with objects that are already in circulation on the cultural market, which is to say, objects already informed by other objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Relational Aesthetics Nicolas Bourriaud Relational Aesthetics
    Relational Aesthetics Nicolas Bourriaud Relational Aesthetics Translated by Simon Pleasance & Fronza Woods with the participation of Mathieu Copeland les pressesdu reel Fag 1,NV_.-rAT 9ft! .,K ,_ Perttraetme .. 8 !L� I e� /s;-t&1/22-1 Collection Documents sur l'art: Available in french: Nicolas Bourriaud, Esthetique relationnelle, 1998 Eric Troncy, Le Colonel Moutarde dans Ia bibliotheque avec le chandelier, 1998 Dan Graham, Rock/Music Textes, 1999 Robert Nickas, Vivre libre ou mourir, 2000 Philippe Parreno, Speech Bubbles, 200 1 Prieres americaines, 2002 Avalaible in english: Robert Nickas, Live Free or Die, 2000 Nicolas Bourriaud, Relational Aesthetics, 2002 © Les presses du reel, 1998 © Les presses du reel, 2002 (for the english translation) www.lespressesdureel.com Space-time exchange factors Artworks and exchanges Because art is made of the same material as the social exchanges, it has a special place in the collective production process. A work of art has a quality that sets it apart from other things produced by human activities. This quality is its (relative) social transparency. If a work of art is successful, it will invariably set its sights beyond its mere presence in space: it will be open to dialogue, discussion, and that form of inter-human negotiation that Marcel Duchamp called "the coefficient of art", which is a temporal process, being played out here and now. This negotiation is undertaken in a spirit of "transparency" which hallmarks it as a product of human labour. The work of art actually shows (or suggests) not only its manufacturing and production process, its position within the set of exchanges, and the place, or function, it allocates to the beholder, but also the creative behaviour of the artist (otherwise put, the sequence of postures and gestures which make up his/her work, and which each individual work passes on like a sample or marker).
    [Show full text]
  • Relational Aesthetics: Creativity in the Inter-Human Sphere
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 RELATIONAL AESTHETICS: CREATIVITY IN THE INTER-HUMAN SPHERE Carl Patow VCU Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Interactive Arts Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/5756 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Carl A. Patow 2019 All Rights Reserved Relational Aesthetics: Creativity in the Inter-Human Sphere A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Fine Art at Virginia Commonwealth University. By Carl Patow BA Duke University, Durham, NC 1975 MD University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 1979 MPH Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 1996 MBA University of St. Thomas, Minneapolis, MN 2007 Committee: Pamela Taylor Turner Associate Professor Kinetic Imaging, VCU Arts Stephanie Thulin Assistant Chair and Associate Professor Kinetic Imaging, VCU Arts John Freyer Assistant Professor of Cross Disciplinary Media Photography and Film, VCU Arts Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia May 2, 2019 2 Acknowledgement The author wishes to thank my wife, Sue, for her love, encouragement and patience as I fulfilled this life-long dream of a master’s in fine arts degree. I would also like to thank the faculty members of the Department of Kinetic Imaging at VCU for their guidance and inspiration. Pam Turner, Stephanie Thulin and John Freyer, my committee members, were especially helpful in shaping my thesis and artwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomma Abts Francis Alÿs Mamma Andersson Karla Black Michaël
    Tomma Abts 2015 Books Zwirner David Francis Alÿs Mamma Andersson Karla Black Michaël Borremans Carol Bove R. Crumb Raoul De Keyser Philip-Lorca diCorcia Stan Douglas Marlene Dumas Marcel Dzama Dan Flavin Suzan Frecon Isa Genzken Donald Judd On Kawara Toba Khedoori Jeff Koons Yayoi Kusama Kerry James Marshall Gordon Matta-Clark John McCracken Oscar Murillo Alice Neel Jockum Nordström Chris Ofili Palermo Raymond Pettibon Neo Rauch Ad Reinhardt Jason Rhoades Michael Riedel Bridget Riley Thomas Ruff Fred Sandback Jan Schoonhoven Richard Serra Yutaka Sone Al Taylor Diana Thater Wolfgang Tillmans Luc Tuymans James Welling Doug Wheeler Christopher Williams Jordan Wolfson Lisa Yuskavage David Zwirner Books Recent and Forthcoming Publications No Problem: Cologne/New York – Bridget Riley: The Stripe Paintings – Yayoi Kusama: I Who Have Arrived In Heaven Jeff Koons: Gazing Ball Ad Reinhardt Ad Reinhardt: How To Look: Art Comics Richard Serra: Early Work Richard Serra: Vertical and Horizontal Reversals Jason Rhoades: PeaRoeFoam John McCracken: Works from – Donald Judd Dan Flavin: Series and Progressions Fred Sandback: Decades On Kawara: Date Paintings in New York and Other Cities Alice Neel: Drawings and Watercolors – Who is sleeping on my pillow: Mamma Andersson and Jockum Nordström Kerry James Marshall: Look See Neo Rauch: At the Well Raymond Pettibon: Surfers – Raymond Pettibon: Here’s Your Irony Back, Political Works – Raymond Pettibon: To Wit Jordan Wolfson: California Jordan Wolfson: Ecce Homo / le Poseur Marlene
    [Show full text]
  • Press Infinite Jester Frieze, October 13, 2005
    MARIAN GOODMAN GALLERY Infinite Jester On the occasion of his major retrospective at the Guggenheim, New York, from issue 94, 2005, Tom Morton on Maurizio Cattelan By Tom Morton (October 13, 2005) Maybe I’m just saying that we’re all corrupted in a way; life itself is corrupted, and that’s the way we like it.1 –Maurizio Cattelan In Philip Roth’s novel The Human Stain (2000) three anonymous men sit on a bench in the grounds of an American Liberal Arts college, debating the fall-out of the Monica Lewinsky affair. They’re brassy guys, with brassy manners, and one of them offers up the opinion that ‘If Clinton had fucked her in the ass, she might have shut her mouth. Had he turned her over in the Oval Office and fucked her in the ass, none of this would have happened.’2 His companions concur; yes, this would’ve been the President’s best course of action. After all: ‘You give somebody something they can’t talk about. Then you’ve got them. You involve them in a mutual transgression, and you have a mutual corruption.’3 Since the late 1980s Maurizio Cattelan has been making art that’s tough to talk about, or at least with much rigour or much candour. There’s plenty of noise made about Cattelan, sure (few of his contemporaries share his profile), but this is mostly composed of gasps of faux astonishment, or of a frenzied clapping that, while it applauds the artist’s work, also attempts to fend it off.
    [Show full text]
  • Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research CUNY Graduate Center 2004 Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics Claire Bishop CUNY Graduate Center How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_pubs/96 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics CLAIRE BISHOP The Palais de Tokyo On the occasion of its opening in 2002, the Palais de Tokyo immediately struck the visitor as different from other contemporary art venues that had recently opened in Europe. Although a budget of 4.75 million euros was spent on converting the former Japanese pavilion for the 1937 World’s Fair into a “site for contemporary creation,” most of this money had been used to reinforce (rather than renovate) the existing structure.1 Instead of clean white walls, discreetly installed lighting, and wooden floors, the interior was left bare and unfinished. This decision was important, as it reflected a key aspect of the venue’s curatorial ethos under its codirectorship by Jerôme Sans, an art critic and curator, and Nicolas Bourriaud, former curator at CAPC Bordeaux and editor of the journal Documents sur l’art. The Palais de Tokyo’s improvised relationship to its surroundings has subsequently become paradigmatic of a visible tendency among European art venues to reconceptualize the “white cube” model of displaying contemporary art as a studio or experimental “laboratory.”2 It is therefore in the tradition of what 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Jason Rhoades's SLOTO
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Insite | Outsite The perpetuation of site-specific installation artworks in museums Scholte, T.I. Publication date 2020 Document Version Final published version License Other Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Scholte, T. I. (2020). Insite | Outsite: The perpetuation of site-specific installation artworks in museums. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 Insite Outsite The Perpetuation of Site-Specific Installation Artworks in Museums ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. dr. Ir. K.I.J.Maex ten overstaan van een door College van Promoties ingestelde commissie, in het openbaar te verdedigen in de Aula der Universiteit op donderdag 13 februari 2020, te 15.00 uur door Tatjana Irene Scholte geboren te Amsterdam Promotiecommissie Promotor: prof.
    [Show full text]