Groundwater Recharge from the Gascoyne River, Western Australia Hydrogeological Record Series Report No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Groundwater Recharge from the Gascoyne River, Western Australia Hydrogeological Record Series Report No Government of Western Australia Department of Water Looking after all our water needs Groundwater recharge from the Gascoyne River, Western Australia Hydrogeological record series Report no. HG 32 May 2009 Groundwater recharge from the Gascoyne River, Western Australia Wade John Dodson (1) (1)Formerly of Department of Water Department of Water Hydrogeological record series Report no. HG 32 May 2009 Department of Water 168 St Georges Terrace Perth Western Australia 6000 Telephone +61 8 6364 7600 Facsimile +61 8 6364 7601 www.water.wa.gov.au © Government of Western Australia 2009 May 2009 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Water. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication The recommended reference for this publication is: Dodson, Wade John 2009, Groundwater recharge from the Gascoyne River, Western Australia, Western Australia Department of Water, Hydrogeological record series HG 32. ISSN 1329-542X (print) ISSN 1834-9188 (online) ISBN 978-1-921508-59-2 (print) ISBN 978-1-921508-60-8 (online) Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Dr Angus Davidson, Mr Chris O’Boy and Dr Binh Anson for their support. For more information about this report, contact Section Manager, Groundwater Assessment. Cover photo: Gascoyne River, Western Australia Groundwater recharge from the Gascoyne River, Western Australia Hydrogeological record series, no. HG 32 Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................ix 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................1 1.1 Historical setting ............................................................................................1 1.2 Location .........................................................................................................3 1.3 Climate ..........................................................................................................3 1.4 Physiography .................................................................................................6 1.4.1 Drainage ..........................................................................................10 1.5 Vegetation ....................................................................................................10 1.6 Land use ......................................................................................................11 1.7 Water supply ................................................................................................11 1.8 Previous investigations ................................................................................13 1.8.1 Geology ...........................................................................................13 1.8.2 Hydrogeology ..................................................................................13 1.8.3 Groundwater modelling ...................................................................15 1.8.4 Drilling and testing ...........................................................................16 1.8.4.1 Pumping-tests ....................................................................19 1.8.4.2 Geophysical logging ..........................................................20 2 Geology ................................................................................................................22 2.1 Geological setting ........................................................................................22 2.1.1 Toolunga Calcilutite .........................................................................23 2.1.2 Cardabia Calcarenite .......................................................................23 2.1.3 Older alluvium ..................................................................................23 2.1.4 Riverbed sand .................................................................................25 2.2 Depositional environment ............................................................................26 3 Hydrology .............................................................................................................28 3.1 Stream gauging ...........................................................................................28 3.2 River flow and no flow probability ................................................................32 3.3 Surface water-groundwater interaction ........................................................35 3.4 Chloride in surface water .............................................................................38 3.5 Surface water salinity ..................................................................................42 Department of Water iii Hydrogeological record series, no. HG 32 Groundwater recharge from the Gascoyne River, Western Australia 4 Hydrogeology .......................................................................................................44 4.1 Groundwater occurrence .............................................................................44 4.1.1 Riverbed sand aquifer .....................................................................44 4.1.1.1 Groundwater storage .........................................................46 4.1.2 Older alluvium aquifer......................................................................46 4.1.2.1 Groundwater storage .........................................................48 4.2 Groundwater balance ..................................................................................55 4.2.1 No flow analysis ...............................................................................55 4.2.1.1 Change in riverbed sand storage ......................................56 4.2.1.2 Leakage downwards to older alluvium ..............................58 4.2.1.3 Groundwater flow in the riverbed sand ..............................59 4.2.1.4 Abstraction from riverbed sand ..........................................60 4.2.1.5 Rainfall recharge to riverbed sand .....................................61 4.2.1.6 Evapotranspiration from riverbed sand ..............................62 4.2.2 River flow flownet analysis ..............................................................63 4.2.2.1 Throughflow by groundwater hydraulics ............................64 4.2.2.2 Throughflow by chloride mass balance .............................66 4.2.2.3 Throughflow in the riverbed sand ......................................67 4.2.2.4 Throughflow in the older alluvium ......................................69 South of the river ...............................................................69 North of the river ................................................................70 4.3 Groundwater–ocean water interface ...........................................................71 4.4 Groundwater chemistry ...............................................................................72 5 Groundwater flow model ......................................................................................75 5.1 Computer code ............................................................................................75 5.2 Model construction ......................................................................................76 5.2.1 Modelling rationale ..........................................................................76 5.2.2 Model grid and layers ......................................................................77 5.2.3 Digital files for modelling..................................................................78 5.2.4 Boundary conditions ........................................................................78 5.2.4.1 Re-wetting boundary conditions ........................................80 5.2.5 Hydraulic parameters ......................................................................81 5.2.5.1 Layer codes and storage properties ..................................81 5.2.5.2 Hydraulic conductivity ........................................................82 iv Department of Water Groundwater recharge from the Gascoyne River, Western Australia Hydrogeological record series, no. HG 32 5.2.6 Model stresses ................................................................................83 5.2.6.1 Rier flow ...........................................................................83 5.2.6.2 Eapotranspiration .............................................................86 5.2.6.3 Groundwater abstraction ...................................................88 5.2.6.4 Rainfall ...............................................................................90 5.3 Calibration ...................................................................................................91 5.3.1 Sensitiity analysis ..........................................................................93 5.3.2 Verification .......................................................................................93 5.3.3 Hydrographs ....................................................................................94 5.3.4 Water balance components .............................................................96 5.3.4.1 Eapotranspiration .............................................................97
Recommended publications
  • Gascoyne FAST FACTS 2017
    Gascoyne FAST FACTS 2017 Population As illustrated in figure 1, since 2001 the Gascoyne has exhibited significant depopulation, experiencing a net 4.3% decrease. Although there has been notable population growth between the With a population of approximately 10,000 people in 2015, the years 2007 and 2014 (6.1%), the Gascoyne has experienced a Gascoyne has the lowest estimated resident population of all the recent 0.2% population decrease between 2014 and 2015. regions in Western Australia. 10600 7000 10400 6000 10200 5000 10000 9800 4000 9600 3000 2005 9400 9200 2000 2015 9000 Population 1000 8800 Population 0 Carnarvon Exmouth Shark Bay Upper Gascoyne Year Local Government Area Figure 2: Estimated Resident Population for the Gascoyne’s Local Government Figure 1: Estimated Gascoyne Resident Population 2001 – 2015 (source: Australian Areas (source: ABS). Bureau of Statistics (ABS)). Gascoyne Fast Facts 2017 1 Age Structure The Shire of Carnarvon is the most populated of the Gascoyne’s 4 local government areas with a population of just over 6,000 in 2015. 10.00 9.00 As displayed in figure 2, the population in the Shire of Carnarvon has 8.00 remained fairly static between 2005 and 2015. 7.00 6.00 5.00 The greatest local population increase from 2005 to 2015 was 4.00 in the Shire of Exmouth (15.9%). 3.00 The local government area experiencing the greatest 2.00 Population (%) Population 1.00 population decrease from 2005 to 2015 was the Shire of 0.00 Upper Gascoyne (-20.5%). Shark Bay has experienced recent (2014 – 2015) population growth (1.4%), greater than the growth for Western Australia Age Cohort (1.3%) for the same time period.
    [Show full text]
  • Driving in Wa • a Guide to Rest Areas
    DRIVING IN WA • A GUIDE TO REST AREAS Driving in Western Australia A guide to safe stopping places DRIVING IN WA • A GUIDE TO REST AREAS Contents Acknowledgement of Country 1 Securing your load 12 About Us 2 Give Animals a Brake 13 Travelling with pets? 13 Travel Map 2 Driving on remote and unsealed roads 14 Roadside Stopping Places 2 Unsealed Roads 14 Parking bays and rest areas 3 Litter 15 Sharing rest areas 4 Blackwater disposal 5 Useful contacts 16 Changing Places 5 Our Regions 17 Planning a Road Trip? 6 Perth Metropolitan Area 18 Basic road rules 6 Kimberley 20 Multi-lingual Signs 6 Safe overtaking 6 Pilbara 22 Oversize and Overmass Vehicles 7 Mid-West Gascoyne 24 Cyclones, fires and floods - know your risk 8 Wheatbelt 26 Fatigue 10 Goldfields Esperance 28 Manage Fatigue 10 Acknowledgement of Country The Government of Western Australia Rest Areas, Roadhouses and South West 30 Driver Reviver 11 acknowledges the traditional custodians throughout Western Australia Great Southern 32 What to do if you breakdown 11 and their continuing connection to the land, waters and community. Route Maps 34 Towing and securing your load 12 We pay our respects to all members of the Aboriginal communities and Planning to tow a caravan, camper trailer their cultures; and to Elders both past and present. or similar? 12 Disclaimer: The maps contained within this booklet provide approximate times and distances for journeys however, their accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Main Roads reserves the right to update this information at any time without notice. To the extent permitted by law, Main Roads, its employees, agents and contributors are not liable to any person or entity for any loss or damage arising from the use of this information, or in connection with, the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-09-16 QON Stock on Stations
    16 SEP 2014 :...:_~,_.~~- . -'-~~--.•.•..""".;".",,- -~" LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ~ ~-..i Question on notice Wednesday, 13 August 2014 1447. Hon Robin Chapple to the Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Lands. I refer to the Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia pastoral condition assessment reports, the Western Australian Rangeland Monitoring System (WARMS) and pastoral stations Binthalya, Boolathana, Brick House, Callagiddy, Callytharra Springs, Cardabia, Cooalya, Cooralya, Doorawarrah, Edaggee, Ellavalla, Gnaraloo, Hill Springs, Kennedy Range, Lyndon, Manberry, Mardathuna, Marrilla, Marron, Meedo, Meeragoolia, Mia Mia, Middalya, Minilya, Moogooree, Mooka, Pimbee, Quobba, Wahroonga, Wandagee, Warroora, Williambury, Winning, Wooramel, Woyyo, Yalbalgo, Yalobia and Yaringa, and I ask: (a) which of these stations are farming sheep; (b) which of these stations are farming Damara or Dorper species; (c) which of these stations are farming goats; (d) what are the estimated numbers of farmed animals on each station; (e) what is the estimated density of farmed animals on each station; (f) what are the latest pastoral condition assessment reports for these stations; (g) will the minister table the latest pastoral condition assessment reports for these stations; (h) if no to (g), why not; (i) are any of these stations subject to any changes in Range Land Condition Index reports; 0) are there any negative changes in rangeland conditions for the above stations; (k) if yes to 0), which stations; (I) is the Minister and
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Decisions at at 12 October 2018
    MINISTERIAL DECISIONS AS AT OCTOBER 2020 Recently received Awaiting decision pursuant to section 45(7) of Pending submission to Pending decision by Ministerial decision the Environmental Protection Act 1986 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Minister for Aboriginal Affairs APPLICANT / MINISTERIAL LAND PURPOSE LANDOWNER DECISION September 2020 Lot 140 on DP 39512, CT 2227/905, 140 South Western Highway, Land Act No. 11238201, Lot 141 on DP 39512, CT 2227/906, 141 South Western Highway, Land Act No. 11238202, 202 Vittoria Road, Land Act No. 11891696, Glen Iris. Pending Intersection Vittoria Road Lot 201 on DP 57769, CT 2686/979, 201 submission to Main Roads South Western Highway South Western Highway, Land Act No. Minister for Western Australia upgrade and Bridge 0430 11733330, Lot 202 on DP 56668, CT Aboriginal Affairs replacement, Picton. 2754/978, Picton. Road Reserve, Land Act No.s 1575861, 11397280, 11397277, 1347375, and 1292274. Unallocated Crown Land, South Western Highway, Land Act No.s 11580413, 1319074 and 1292275, Picton. Pending Fortifying Mining Pty Ltd – Tenements M25/369, P25/2618, submission to Fortify Mining Pty Majestic North Project. To P25/2619, P25/2620, and P25/2621, Minister for Ltd undertake exploration and Goldfields. Aboriginal Affairs resource delineation drilling Reserve 34565, Lot 11835 on Plan Pending 240379, CT 3141/191, Coode Street, Landscape enhancement submission to City of South South Perth, Land Act No. 1081341 and and river restoration. To Minister for Perth Reserve 48325, Lot 301 on Plan 47451, construct the Waterbird Aboriginal Affairs CT 3151/548, 171 Riverside Drive, Land Refuge Act No. 11714773, Perth Pending Able Planning and Lot 501 on Plan 23800, CT 2219/673, submission to Lot 501 Yalyalup Urban Project 113 Vasse Highway, Yalyalup, Land Act Minister for Subdivision.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Related Structures on the Coast of Western Australia
    Port Related Structures on the Coast of Western Australia By: D.A. Cumming, D. Garratt, M. McCarthy, A. WoICe With <.:unlribuliuns from Albany Seniur High Schoul. M. Anderson. R. Howard. C.A. Miller and P. Worsley Octobel' 1995 @WAUUSEUM Report: Department of Matitime Archaeology, Westem Australian Maritime Museum. No, 98. Cover pholograph: A view of Halllelin Bay in iL~ heyday as a limber porl. (W A Marilime Museum) This study is dedicated to the memory of Denis Arthur Cuml11ing 1923-1995 This project was funded under the National Estate Program, a Commonwealth-financed grants scheme administered by the Australian HeriL:'lge Commission (Federal Government) and the Heritage Council of Western Australia. (State Govenlluent). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Heritage Council of Western Australia Mr lan Baxter (Director) Mr Geny MacGill Ms Jenni Williams Ms Sharon McKerrow Dr Lenore Layman The Institution of Engineers, Australia Mr Max Anderson Mr Richard Hartley Mr Bmce James Mr Tony Moulds Mrs Dorothy Austen-Smith The State Archive of Westem Australia Mr David Whitford The Esperance Bay HistOIical Society Mrs Olive Tamlin Mr Merv Andre Mr Peter Anderson of Esperance Mr Peter Hudson of Esperance The Augusta HistOIical Society Mr Steve Mm'shall of Augusta The Busselton HistOlical Societv Mrs Elizabeth Nelson Mr Alfred Reynolds of Dunsborough Mr Philip Overton of Busselton Mr Rupert Genitsen The Bunbury Timber Jetty Preservation Society inc. Mrs B. Manea The Bunbury HistOlical Society The Rockingham Historical Society The Geraldton Historical Society Mrs J Trautman Mrs D Benzie Mrs Glenis Thomas Mr Peter W orsley of Gerald ton The Onslow Goods Shed Museum Mr lan Blair Mr Les Butcher Ms Gaye Nay ton The Roebourne Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Barque Stefano Shipwreck Early NW Talandji Ngarluma Aboriginal
    [IV] SOME EARLY NORTH WEST INDIGENOUS WORDLISTS Josko Petkovic They spoke a language close to Talandji and were sometimes considered only to be western Talandji, but informants were sure that they had separate identities for a long time. Norman B.Tindale1 The indigenous words in the Stefano manuscript give us an important albeit small window into the languages of the North West Cape Aborigines.2 From the available information, we can now be reasonably certain that this wordlist belongs primarily to the Yinikurtira language group.3 We also know that the Yinikurtira community came to be dispersed about one hundred years ago and its members ceased using the Yinikuritra language, which is now formally designated as extinct.4 If in these circumstances we want to find something authentic about the Yinikurtira language we cannot do so by simply asking one of its living speakers. Rather, we need to look at the documents on the Yinikurtira language and culture from about a century ago and from the time when the Yinikurtira people were still living on Yinikurtira country. The documentation we have on the Yinikurtira people comes primarily from Tom Carter, who lived among the Yinikurtira community for about thirteen years.5 Carter left an extensive collection of indigenous bird names and through Daisy Bates he left a considerable vocabulary of Yinikurtira words.6 In his diaries there is an enigmatic paragraph on the languages of the North West Cape region, in which he differentiates the languages north and south of the Gascoyne River, while also invoking a commonality of languages north of the Gascoyne River: The natives of the Gascoyne Lower River were of the Inggarda tribe and spoke a quite different language from By-oong tribe of the Minilya River, only eight miles distant.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilbara–Gascoyne
    Pilbara–Gascoyne 11 Pilbara–Gascoyne ...................................................... 2 11.5 Surface water and groundwater ....................... 26 11.1 Introduction ........................................................ 2 11.5.1 Rivers ................................................... 26 11.2 Key information .................................................. 3 11.5.2 Flooding ............................................... 26 11.3 Description of the region .................................. 4 11.5.3 Storage systems ................................... 26 11.3.1 Physiographic characteristics.................. 6 11.5.4 Wetlands .............................................. 26 11.3.2 Elevation ................................................. 7 11.5.5 Hydrogeology ....................................... 30 11.3.3 Slopes .................................................... 8 11.5.6 Water table salinity ................................ 30 11.3.4 Soil types ............................................... 9 11.5.7 Groundwater management units ........... 30 11.3.5 Land use ............................................. 11 11.6 Water for cities and towns ............................... 34 11.3.6 Population distribution .......................... 13 11.6.1 Urban centres ....................................... 34 11.3.7 Rainfall zones ....................................... 14 11.6.2 Sources of water supply ....................... 34 11.3.8 Rainfall deficit ....................................... 15 11.6.3 Geraldton ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • 20131118 DBNGP EP Public Summary Document
    Dampier to Bunbury Natural Gas Pipeline ENVIRONMENT PLAN REVISION 5.2 SUMMARY DOCUMENT NOVEMBER 2013 DBNGP Environment Plan Revision 5.2 Summary Document DOCUMENT CONTROL Rev Date Description 0 18/11/13 Document created for the DBNGP EP Revision 5.2 Title Name Author Senior Advisor – Environment and Heritage L Watson Reviewed Manager - Health Safety and Environment D Ferguson Approved General Manager - Corporate Services A Cribb 2 DBNGP Environment Plan Revision 5.2 Summary Document Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Proponent ...................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Location ......................................................................................................................................... 4 4. Existing Environment ................................................................................................................... 4 4.1. Pilbara Region .......................................................................................................................... 7 4.2. Carnarvon Region .................................................................................................................... 7 4.3. Gascoyne Region ..................................................................................................................... 8 4.4. Yalgoo Region .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • R.E. Bush, Gascoyne Explorer and Pastoralist
    R.E. BUSH, GASCOYNE EXPLORER AND PASTORALIST by C.W.M. Cameron , Robert Edwin (most frequently referred to as R.E.) Bush, first interested me whenI wasresearching Frank Wittenoom. They wereofthesame age, andfriends from the time Bush came to Western Australia untiltheyboth diedwithina few months of each other, in 1939. A section in the Wittenoom book represented mostof what I knewof him until by courtesy of hisgranddaughter, Miss Tessa Bush, I received a copyofsome early journals, written to his family. Thejourneys described were at the start of his Western Australian life, a start fromwhichhe became a prosperous pastoralist and a public citizen and thenretired to England to bea countrygentleman, keeping up the tradition hisancestors hadmaintained in Gloucestershire for 400 years. Robert Bush wasbornin 1855 anddiedin 1939, having made his last of thirteen trips to W.A. in 1938. There are therefore a few who wouldremember hislater visits to W.A., but nonehis arrival in 1877. What no doubt attracted the young man of twenty-two to try his luck in W.A. was that his father, Lt. Col. Robert Bush. was in charge ofthe96thInfantry guarding theyoung Swan River settlement in the 1840s, returning to Bristol in 1851. At the age of ten young Robert Edwin went as a day boy to the new public school, Clifton College, at Bristol. There his chiefclaim to remembrance seems to havebeen that he was Captain of the school cricket and later played for Gloucestershire from 1874-7 in the time of the famous Grace brothers. This had its own results for W.A. Bush had a boarder friend at Clifton, Thomas Souther Lodge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Managed Aquifer Recharge in Developing Northern Australian Agriculture CASE STUDIES to DETERMINE the ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY
    Managed Aquifer Recharge ISSN 2206-1991 Volume 2 No 3 2017 https://doi.org/10.21139/wej.2017.029 THE ROLE OF MANAGED AQUIFER RECHARGE IN DEVELOPING NORTHERN AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE CASE STUDIES TO DETERMINE THE ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY R Evans, L Lennon, G Hoxley, R Krake, D Yin Foo, C Schelfhout, J Simons ABSTRACT more economically attractive for horticulture production. Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) is a commonly used technique in many countries to artificially increase the INTRODUCTION This paper describes a study to consider the role recharge rate over the wet season and hence increase of MAR in developing irrigated agriculture in the the groundwater storage available during the dry season. Northern Territory (Daly catchment and Central Considering northern Australia’s long dry season and Australia) and the Pilbara in Western Australia. The relatively short wet season, MAR has the potential to play fundamental advantages of MAR based developments a major role in water resource development. over conventional water sources (typically large dams) Shallow weirs, infiltration trenches and injection bores are the cost of transporting water, lack of evaporative were considered as the main MAR methods. Five losses, seasonal variability and the scalability of sites were assessed in the Pilbara and seven across MAR projects. Conversely, impediments are believed the Northern Territory. After consideration of a range to be primarily the economic feasibility rather than of factors such as the available source water, local the technical feasibility. When compared to other hydrogeology, soil suitability and potential irrigation water supply options, MAR can be attractive both demand, most sites were considered technically feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraining the Jurassic Extent of Greater India: Tectonic Evolution of the West Australian Margin
    Article Volume 13, Number 5 25 May 2012 Q05W13, doi:10.1029/2011GC003919 ISSN: 1525-2027 Constraining the Jurassic extent of Greater India: Tectonic evolution of the West Australian margin Ana D. Gibbons EarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia ([email protected]) Udo Barckhausen BGR, Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Stilleweg 2, D-30655 Hannover, Germany Paul van den Bogaard, Kaj Hoernle, and Reinhard Werner GEOMAR, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, Dienstgebäude Ostufer, Wischhofstr. 1-3, D-24148 Kiel, Germany )(( 855"#..%, andR. Dietmar Müller EarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia [1] Alternative reconstructions of the Jurassic northern extent of Greater India differ by up to several thousand kilometers. We present a new model that is constrained by revised seafloor spreading anomalies, fracture zones and crustal ages based on drillsites/dredges from all the abyssal plains along the West Australian margin and the Wharton Basin, where an unexpected sliver of Jurassic seafloor (153 Ma) has been found embedded in Cretaceous (95 My old) seafloor. Based on fracture zone trajectories, this NeoTethyan sliver must have originally formed along a western extension of the spreading center that formed the Argo Abyssal Plain, separating a western extension of West Argoland/West Burma from Greater India as a ribbon terrane. The NeoTethyan sliver, Zenith and Wallaby plateaus moved as part of Greater India until westward ridge jumps isolated them. Following another spreading reorganization, the Jurassic crust resumed migrating with Greater India until it was re-attached to the Australian plate 95 Ma.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Diet and Potential Ecological Impacts of the Introduced Mozambique Mouthbrooder Oreochromis Mossambicus Peters (Pisces: Cichlidae) in Western Australia
    Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 90: 203–214, 2007 Distribution, diet and potential ecological impacts of the introduced Mozambique mouthbrooder Oreochromis mossambicus Peters (Pisces: Cichlidae) in Western Australia M G Maddern1, D L Morgan&HSGill Centre for Fish & Fisheries Research, School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Murdoch University, WA, 6150, Australia 1Current address: School of Animal Biology (M092), Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia [email protected] Manuscript received June 2007; accepted December 2007 Abstract Oreochromis mossambicus is a highly successful invader of aquatic ecosystems due to its adaptable life history, trophic flexibility, ability to tolerate extreme and often unfavourable environmental conditions and maternal care of offspring. Upon introduction to areas outside of its natural range, these characteristics often give O. mossambicus a competitive advantage over indigenous fishes. Accordingly, O. mossambicus may have deleterious impacts on aquatic communities. Since nonindigenous O. mossambicus populations were first observed in Western Australia in the Gascoyne/Lyons River system (ca 25°S) in 1981, the species has spread north to the Lyndon and Minilya Rivers (ca 23°S), and south to the Chapman River (ca 28°S). There is a high probability of further range expansions of this cichlid in Western Australia due to natural dispersal and human-mediated translocation. Adult and juvenile O. mossambicus consumed primarily detritus and vegetal matter, though juveniles collected from the Gascoyne River were carnivorous. There was no demonstrable dietary overlap between O. mossambicus and the carnivorous and omnivorous sympatric species in the Chapman and Gascoyne Rivers.
    [Show full text]