DOCSLIB.ORG

The Matching Principle and Its Influence on Lobbying Behaviour – a Case of the Revised Proposal to Revenue Recognition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Matching Principle and Its Influence on Lobbying Behaviour – a Case of the Revised Proposal to Revenue Recognition 1 Amsterdam Business School Faculty of Economics & Business The Matching Principle and its Influence on Lobbying Behaviour – A case of the Revised Proposal to Revenue Recognition Master Thesis Master of Science (Accountancy & Control) Academic Year 2013 / 2014 Final Version Paul Walker 10605401 Supervisor: Dr. S.W. Bissessur Second Supervisor: Dr. I.R. Sander Van Triest 2 Abstract In May 2014, the FASB and IASB jointly released the long awaited revised standard on recognizing revenue. However, before this release there was an extensive period that allowed for comment and opinion on the proposals. These comments, a form of lobbying, form an integral part of the standard-setting process. This paper focusses on these comment letters, and attempts to analyse the issues and concerns that the respondents who sent in comment letters have about the proposed standard. In particular, we want to see how the shift in the approach to financial reporting and its effect on the matching of revenue and expenses will influence a firm’s decision to lobby against the standard. By using a mixed-method approach, this paper finds that there are seven key themes that are widespread throughout the comment letters with two of these themes indirectly referring to the matching concept. Empirically, we also examine differences between firms who chose to submit a letter with a matched sample that did not submit a comment letter. In particular, we find that there are differences in earnings characteristics between these two sets. While this paper does not examine the direct effects of the new standard, it does offer an indication of which firms are going to be most affected. More interesting, however, is that these results offer a clue in to which type of firms are more likely to lobby against a proposed standard, and the characteristics that these firms possess. Key Words IFRS, Standard Setting, Lobbying, Matching, Revenue Recognition, Due Process, Earnings, Volatility, Persistence, IASB, FASB, Comment Letter, IFRS 15 3 Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 Background ............................................................................................................................ 4 Research Question .................................................................................................................. 5 Literature Review....................................................................................................................... 6 The Matching Principle .......................................................................................................... 6 Revenue Recognition ............................................................................................................. 8 IFRS 15 ................................................................................................................................ 10 Standard Setting ................................................................................................................... 13 Lobbying .............................................................................................................................. 14 Comment Letter Thematic Analysis ........................................................................................ 17 Issues Raised ........................................................................................................................ 18 Strength of Comment Letters ............................................................................................... 22 Reference to the Matching Principle .................................................................................... 25 Empirical Hypotheses and Methodology ................................................................................. 27 Hypothesis Development ..................................................................................................... 28 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 31 Empirical Results ..................................................................................................................... 35 Conclusion, Limitations and Future Research ......................................................................... 41 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................ 46 Appendix I ............................................................................................................................... 49 4 Introduction Background On the 28th May 2014, the FASB and IASB, together, released the long awaited standard on recognizing revenue: Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The standard, subject to endorsement by the European Commission, will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1st January 2017. This has been a project of the FASB and IASB (hereafter the ‘Board’) since 2002, thereby taking nearly twelve years for it to come to completion. This revision was a response to the limitations in the previous revenue recognition standards, and the accounting scandals that were a consequence of these limitations. The evolution of the business environment also required that revisions were made to the standards. The old rules were seen as outdated with regard to the complex forms of transactions that have emerged in recent years. One of the key changes to this standard was the approach to which it addressed financial reporting. Whereas before there was a mix of the revenue-expense and asset-liability approach to reporting, this new standard full reflects the asset-liability style. Extant literature on this subject covers the costs and benefits of such an approach, however, one thing that seems unanimous is how this ‘balance sheet’ method of reporting will relinquish the importance of matching expenses with their appropriate revenues. This shift towards the asset-liability approach is widespread throughout the Board’s other projects, and matching certainly seems to no longer be a fundamental concept. Although the ‘Boards’ are predominately the ones in charge of the standard setting procedure, the opinions of all stakeholders need to be considered so that these standard setters can obtain legitimacy. As such, both the FASB and IASB have a ‘due process’ established whereby the concerns, comments, issues and opinions of stakeholders can be deliberated. Despite it being well known that the main goal of accounting standards is to assist investors getting decision useful information, it is widely acknowledged that economic consequences also arise because of these standards. The participation in the standard setting due process can be seen as a lobbying attempt to influence the standard, and have these “non-intended” economic consequences removed. By analysing these lobbying attempts, we can further understand what issues and concerns are underpinned in the proposal. We also want to explore the characteristics of the firms who deem it necessary to lobby against the standard, and whether these characteristics help to explain their decision to do so. 5 This paper takes a look at this due process, and the issues raised by preparers of financial statements in regard to the Revised Exposure Draft on Revenue Recognition. This was the second Exposure Draft that was published for this standard, and was released in January 2011 after amendments were made to it following comments made in the due process. In particular, we take a look at the matching concept, and how the issues raised in the due process reflect this concern. Using a model by Dichev & Tang (2008), we use earnings characteristics that are shaped by the level of matching to explore which firms are lobbying against the standard, and which are not. Using assumptions based on cost benefit analyses, the essence of our predictions is that firms who currently benefit the most from ‘better aligned’ matching have more to lose as standards no longer see matching as an important concept. We qualitatively assess the issues, reasoning’s, effects and solutions of the revised Exposure Draft to Revenue Recognition to identify the key themes that are reoccurring. Using this qualitative analysis, we then empirically test to see if there is a difference in earnings characteristics between firms who lobby, and firms who do not. Subsequently, we test to see if there is a difference in earnings characteristics between the firms who did lobby, based on the arguments and issues that they made in their response. Research Question The overarching theme of this paper is to understand the concerns that preparers have with the proposed standard to recognizing revenue, and how (if at all) these issues can be related to the matching concept. Previous literature suggests that matching is becoming less of a priority, and the benefits of good matching will consequently be diminished as a result of change of priority. By understanding the issues, we can then explore which firms are most concerned about the possible changes to the matching of revenues and expenses, and what is unique about these firms? What are the characteristics that make some firms concerned, but yet make other firms not concerned? In particular, we use previous
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE MATCHING CONCEPT and the ADJUSTING PROCESS Objectives
    3 THE MATCHING CONCEPT AND THE ADJUSTING PROCESS objectives After studying this chapter, you should be able to: Explain how the matching concept 1 relates to the accrual basis of accounting. Explain why adjustments are neces- 2 sary and list the characteristics of adjusting entries. Journalize entries for accounts requir- 3 ing adjustment. Summarize the adjustment process 4 and prepare an adjusted trial balance. Use vertical analysis to compare finan- 5 cial statement items with each other and with industry averages. PHOTO: © PHOTODISC GREEN/GETTY IMAGES Assume that you rented an apartment last month and signed a nine-month lease. When you signed the lease agreement, you were required to pay the final month’s rent of $500. This amount is not returnable to you. You are now applying for a student loan at a local bank. The loan application re- quires a listing of all your assets. Should you list the $500 deposit as an asset? The answer to this question is “yes.” The deposit is an asset to you until you re- ceive the use of the apartment in the ninth month. A business faces similar accounting problems at the end of a period. A business must determine what assets, liabilities, and owner’s equity should be reported on its balance sheet. It must also determine what revenues and expenses should be reported on its income statement. As we illustrated in previous chapters, transactions are normally recorded as they take place. Periodically, financial statements are prepared, summarizing the effects of the transactions on the financial position and operations of the business.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Balance Sheet-Based Model of Financial Reporting
    On the Balance Sheet-Based Model of Financial Reporting Occasional Paper Series Center for Excellence in Accounting & Security Analysis Columbia Business School established the Center for Excellence in Accounting and Security Analysis in 2003 under the direction of Trevor Harris and Professor Stephen Penman. The Center (“CEASA”) aims to be a leading voice for independent, practical solutions for financial reporting and security analysis, promoting financial reporting that reflects economic reality and encourages investment practices that communicate sound valuations. CEASA’s mission is to develop workable solutions to issues in financial reporting and accounting policy; produce a core set of principles for equity analysis; collect and synthesize best thinking and best practices; disseminate ideas to regulators, analysts, investors, accountants and management; and promote sound research on relevant issues. Drawing on the wisdom of leading experts in academia, industry and government, the Center produces sound research and identifies best practices on relevant issues. CEASA's guiding criterion is to serve the public interest by supporting the integrity of financial reporting and the efficiency of capital markets. Located in a leading university with a mandate for independent research, CEASA is positioned to lead a discussion of issues, with an emphasis on sound conceptual thinking and without obstacles of constituency positions. More information and access to current research is available on our website at http://www.gsb.columbia.edu/ceasa/ The Center is supported by our generous sponsors: General Electric, IBM and Morgan Stanley. We gratefully acknowledge the support of these organizations that recognize the need for this center. ON THE BALANCE SHEET-BASED MODEL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING Principal Consultant Ilia D.
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions to Questions for Chap 9
    CHAPTER 9 Inventories ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS 01. July 24 Accounts Payable ($1,700 – $200) ....................... 1,500 Purchase Discounts ($1,500 X 2%) ................... 30 Cash ($1,500 – $30) .............................. 1,470 02. Accounts Added/Deducted Normal Balance Purchase Returns and Allowances Deducted Credit Purchase Discounts Deducted Credit Freight-in Added Debit 03. (a) X = Purchase returns and allowances and Y = Purchase discounts, or vice versa. (b) X = Freight-in. (c) X = Cost of goods purchased. (d) X = Ending merchandise inventory. 04. Agree. Effective inventory management is frequently the key to successful business operations. Management attempts to maintain sufficient quantities and types of goods to meet expected cus- tomer demand. It also seeks to avoid the cost of carrying inventories that are clearly in excess of anticipated sales. 05. Inventory items have two common characteristics: (1) they are owned by the company and (2) they are in a form ready for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. 06. Taking a physical inventory involves actually counting, weighing or measuring each kind of inven- tory on hand. Retailers, such as a hardware store, generally have thousands of different items to count. This is normally done when the store is closed. Tom will probably count items, and mark the quantity, description, and inventory number on prenumbered inventory tags. 07. (a) (1) The goods will be included in Janine Company's inventory if the terms of sale are FOB destination. (2) They will be included in Laura Company's inventory if the terms of sale are FOB ship- ping point. (b) Janine Company should include goods shipped to a consignee in its inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • Difference Between GAAP and Statutory Accounting
    GAAP vs Statutory Accounting Every industry has a given set of principles for the preparation of financial statements. These principles define how financial transactions should be accounted for in accordance with the rules and regulations of the statutory bodies. Two of these statutory bodies are known as GAAP and SAP. Statutory Accounting Principles, also known as SAP, are used to prepare the financial statements of insurance companies. In the United States, authorized insurers are required to prepare financial information according to SAP. These principles are designed for the insurance departments of different states to help them regulate the solvency of insurance companies. On the other hand, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or GAAP provides a common set of accounting standards, procedures and rules that are defined by the professional accountancy body. Almost every publicly traded company in the United States has adopted GAAP. These principles provide authoritative accounting standards as well as commonly accepted methods of recording and reporting accounting transactions. Companies are required to follow GAAP in order to take the investors into confidence who use financial information of the company for investment purposes. However, GAAP and SAP are not same. There are differences between these two accounting frameworks and these differences are discussed below. Difference between GAAP and Statutory Accounting Industry Difference It is mandatory for all the companies in the United States to use GAAP. When the companies file their financial reports, they are required by the Security and Exchange Commission of the U.S. to follow these Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Financial Accounting Standards Board, also known as FASB, set the GAAP rules and accounting standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Revenue Recognition - Academic Year (Tuition & Fee Revenue, Housing Revenue & Credits, Financial Aid, and Stipend Expense) Policy
    ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Revenue Recognition - Academic Year (Tuition & Fee Revenue, Housing Revenue & Credits, Financial Aid, and Stipend Expense) Policy Approval Authority: Vice Chancellor for Finance Originally issued: May 2018 Responsible Administrator: Controller Responsible Office: Finance Current version effective as of: Enrollment Affairs’ Office November 2019 Policy Contact: Assistant Controller POLICY STATEMENT/REASON FOR POLICY All academic year tuition and fee revenue, housing revenue and credits, financial aid, and stipend expense are deferred at the time of billing. The goal of this document is to define how to recognize tuition and fee revenue, housing revenue and credits, financial aid, and stipend expense in accordance with general accepted accounting principles (GAAP) on a quarterly basis. THIS POLICY APPLIES TO This policy applies to all Vanderbilt financial units receiving tuition and fees revenue, housing revenue and credits, financial aid, and stipend expense for the academic year. This policy does not apply to the summer term; see separate Revenue Recognition Summer Term policy. POLICY A. Entries are recorded quarterly to recognize tuition and fee revenue, housing revenue and credits, financial aid, and stipend expense to ensure revenues and related expenses are properly matched when earned. B. Entries must be posted by the fourth day of close. C. Recognition Methodology Page 1 of 3 DEFINITIONS General Ledger - The general ledger contains all Vanderbilt financial transactions. Currently, the general ledger (system of record) is Oracle. Information from the general ledger is used by Vanderbilt to analyze, report, and monitor the results of the business. Tuition and fees - Tuition is money received in exchange for instruction for which the student receives course credit.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 3 Adjusting the Accounts Time Period Assumption: an Assumption
    Lecture 3 Adjusting the accounts Time period assumption: An assumption that the economic life of a business can be divided into artificial time period. The time period assumption is called the periodicity assumption. Fiscal year : An accounting time period that is one year in length is a fiscal year. A fiscal year usually begins with the first day of a month and ends twelve months later on the last day of a month Accounting time periods are generally a month, a quarter, or a year. Monthly and quarterly time periods are called interim periods. Most large companies must prepare both quarterly and annual financial statements. Calendar year: An accounting period that extends from January 1 to December 31 is called the calendar year Accrual basis accounting : Under the accrual basis, companies record transactions that change a company’s financial statements in the periods in which the events occur. Under the accrual basis, revenues and expenses are recorded when they are earned, regardless of when the money is actually received or paid. This method is more commonly used than the cash method. Cash basis accounting: Under cash-basis accounting, companies record revenue when they receive cash. They record an expense when they pay out cash. The cash basis seems appealing due to its simplicity, but it often produces misleading financial statements. It fails to record revenue that a company has earned but for which it has not received the cash. Also, it does not match expenses with earned revenues. Cash-basis accounting is not in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
    [Show full text]
  • The Matching Principle Prescribes
    The matching principle prescribes Continue Correct. ($44,000 (current tax) less than $4,000 (deferred tax) - $40,000 $4,000 of the estimated current tax tax relates to prepaid income, therefore, $4,000 must be deducted from tax expense and in respect of accounting profits earned next year. that, in the receipt of income, the costs incurred to receive these revenues must be reported during the same reporting period (same income reporting). This principle is central to accounting, the method required by GAAP, since the method of accounting simply reports costs when paying. The principle of comparison relates to the comparison of income recognized during this period with expenditures that resulted in income under the accounting accrual method so that the net result is fairly reported during that period. Since it is sometimes difficult to link income to the costs used to generate it, general guidelines are used to compare costs with income. The principle of conformity and cause and effect The clearest and simplest example of cost-matching with income is the cause and effect of the relationship illustrated in the value of goods sold and income. When a product is sold, the most direct cost incurred is the cost of the product. In the case of the Solar Sunglasses Store, when Solar sells sunglasses for $50, the direct cost of sunglasses incurred to create a sale was $15 paid for sunglasses. The $15 value of the goods sold is recognized with a $50 sale so that the proceeds and expenses incurred to obtain the sale are reported, or consistent, in the same period.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmasking the Matching Principle in Tax Law
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1993 Unmasking the Matching Principle in Tax Law Julie Roin Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Julie Roin, "Unmasking the Matching Principle in Tax Law," 79 Virginia Law Review 813 (1993). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNMASKING THE "MATCHING PRINCIPLE" IN TAX LAW Julie A. Roin * INTRODUTION XItr are accustomed to believing that a taxpayer's treatment of one transaction may determine the tax consequences of a later, related transaction. For example, the amount of gain a taxpayer rec- ognizes upon the disposition of an asset depends on the circumstances under which the taxpayer acquired the asset and, in particular, on the basis created as a result of that acquisition.I We are much less accus- tomed to believing that the tax consequences of a transaction should be determined by another taxpayer's treatment of the transaction. Most commentators are willing to acknowledge that "Congress is free to enact-and should enact-rules to the effect that the tax treatment of one party is in fact keyed to that of another in particulartypes of transactions." 2 But most resist the uniform application of a "'com- mon law' income-tax principle holding that the tax treatment of one '3 taxpayer determines the tax treatment of another." * Class of 1963 Research Professor of Law, University of Virginia Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Preparing Financial Statements
    Revised Summer 2012 CHAPTER 3 PREPARING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Key Terms and Concepts to Know Accounting Period: Time Period Principle Calendar vs. Fiscal Year Accounting Cycle: Know the steps in order. Use the steps as a reference to insure that journal entries, trial balances and financial statements are prepared in the proper order. Accrual Basis Accounting: Accrual vs. Cash Basis Accounting Revenue Recognition Principle requires that revenues are reported in the period in which they are earned, regardless of when payment is received. Matching Principle requires that all expenses incurred (whether paid or not) are recorded in the same accounting period as the revenues earned as a result of these expenses. Adjusting Entries: Accrued revenues and accrued expenses Deferred revenues and deferred expenses Unbilled vs. unearned revenues Closing Process: Records the current year’s net income and dividends in retained earnings and zeros-out the balance in all revenue, expense and dividend accounts at year-end. Revenue and expense account balances are transferred into the Income Summary account. The balance in the income summary represents net income (revenues minus expenses) which is then transferred into retained earnings. Dividends are transferred directly into retained earnings, bypassing the income summary because dividends are not part of the calculation of net income and do not appear on the income statement. Profit Margin ratio and Current ratio Page 1 of 27 Revised Summer 2012 Key Topics to Know Adjusting Entries Adjusting entries are required to record internal transactions and to bring assets and liability accounts to their proper balances and record expenses or revenues in the proper accounting period.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting for Accruals and Deferrals
    ACCOUNTING FOR ACCRUALS AND DEFERRALS LAVERNE FUNDERBURK, CPA UIL ACCOUNTING STATE CONTEST DIRECTOR BEFORE WE GET STARTED… Everyone should Submit Attendance for remain muted questions CPE credit through chat ACCOUNTING FOR ACCRUALS AND DEFERRALS LAVERNE FUNDERBURK, CPA UIL ACCOUNTING STATE CONTEST DIRECTOR FIRST LET’S REVIEW Basis of Accounting Revenue Recognition Matching Principle Accounting Period Cycle Basis of Accounting CASH BASIS—an accounting system that records revenue when cash is received and records expenses in the period the cash is paid. ACCRUAL BASIS—an accounting system that records revenue when it is earned regardless of when the cash is received AND records expenses when they are incurred regardless of when cash is paid out. Revenue Recognition The GAAP principle that revenue is RECORDED on the date it is earned, even if the cash has not yet been received. Matching Principle Revenue and the expenses associated with earning that revenue are recorded in the SAME accounting period. Accounting Period Cycle Financial Statements are prepared for a specific period of time. Accounting Equation: Assets = Liabilities + Capital Increases to Capital Owner Investments Revenue Decreases to Capital Owner Withdrawals Expenses Relationship Between Balance Sheet and Income Statement Assets = Liabilities + Capital Bal side Bal Side Bal Side + - - + - + DR CR DR CR DR CR Expense Revenue Bal Side Bal Side + - - + DR CR DR CR Adjusting Journal Entries (AJEs) Ø Before financial statements are prepared, the accountant must examine the general ledger accounts to make sure they are up-to-date. Ø The accountant may need to examine insurance policies or take a physical inventory of supplies, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Probabilistic Economic Costs in Accounting and Disclosure the Transition from Double-Entry to Triple-Entry Accrual Accounting
    The Concept of Probabilistic Economic Costs in Accounting and Disclosure The Transition from Double-Entry to Triple-Entry Accrual Accounting Introduction Double-entry bookkeeping is the front of accrual accounting, where credits and debits that account for income/assets and expenses/liabilities are accrued in ledgers to be posted to financial statements for consolidation and reconciliation at the end of reporting periods. Together, double- entry and accounting principles (revenue recognition principle, matching principle, going concern assumption and others) constitute the foundation of accrual accounting. However, double-entry is only able to accrue expenses that have already incurred in recognition of bilateral transactional revenue (“bilateral revenue”), such as goods sold and services rendered. It is not able to accrue probabilistic economic costs (“PEC”) in recognition of unilateral non- transactional revenue (“unilateral revenue”) 1, which is forward-looking and derived from unilateral economic activities based on assumptions that beget uncertainties. As unilateral revenue is based on assumptions, its costs are usually unknown initially and cannot be matched when unilateral revenue is recognized. Therefore, there is no debit-entry accrual of PEC in recognition of unilateral revenue, which allows un-accrued PEC to lurk in the dark as an accounting ghost waiting for the worst moment to implode. In other words, significant un-accrued PEC portends sudden valuation/economic impairments that could result in economic insolvency, such as the implosions of Lehman Brothers and Iceland during the 2008 financial crisis. Perhaps the biggest mistake that the accounting profession has made historically is its failure to recognize and develop a forward-looking accrual entry for PEC in revenue recognition and allow unilateral revenue to be recognized as expense-free revenue during the last several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing Basic Accounting Flows: Does XBRL + Model + Animation = Understanding?
    The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research Vol. 10, 2010 pp. 27-54 ISSN: 1577-8517 Visualizing Basic Accounting Flows: Does XBRL + Model + Animation = Understanding? Byron Marshall. Oregon State University, USA. Kristian Mortenson1. Oregon State University, USA. [email protected] Amy Bourne. Oregon State University, USA. Kevin Price. Oregon State University, USA. Abstract: The usefulness of XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) in facilitating efficient data sharing is clear, but widespread use of XBRL also promises to support more effective analysis processes. This format should allow managers, investors, regulators, and students to aggregate, compare and analyze financial information. This study explores an XBRL-based visualization tool that maps the organization of financial statements captured in the XBRL formalism into a graphical representation that organizes, depicts, and animates financial data. We show that our tool integrates and presents profitability, liquidity, financing, and market value data in a manner recognizable to business students. Our findings suggest the promise of XBRL-based visualization tools both in helping students grasp basic accounting concepts and in facilitating financial analysis in general. Key words: XBRL, Visualization, Financial Analysis, Accounting Education 1. INTRODUCTION In today‟s global and interconnected economy, efficient and effective methodologies for communicating organizational financial information are increasingly important. Effective communication, in this context, means organizing useful data for a variety of stakeholders, and storing that data in an accessible location and format to support 1 Data is available from the corresponding author upon request. Submitted October 2009 DOI: 10.4192/1577-8517-v10_2 Accepted March 2010 28 The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research Vol.
    [Show full text]