DOCSLIB.ORG

Manual for Monitoring Air Quality Using Lichens on National Forests of the Pacific Northwest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United States Department of Agriculture Manual for Monitoring Air Forest Service Quality Using Lichens on Pacific Northwest Region National Forests of the Pacific Air Resource Management Northwest R6-NR-ARM-TP-02-04 Field protocols Laboratory protocols Individualized sampling strategies for nine national forests Manual for Monitoring Air Quality Using Lichens on National Forests of the Pacific Northwest Field protocols, laboratory protocols, and individual sampling strategies for the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Deschutes National Forest Gifford Pinchot National Forest Mt. Hood National Forest Siuslaw National Forest Umpqua National Forest Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Willamette National Forest and Winema National Forest US Department of Agriculture-Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Air Resource Management, Portland, Oregon January 2004 Cover illustration of Nephroma laevigatum by Alexander Mikulin. Copies of this document can be obtained from: Program Director, Air Resource Management, USDA-Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region, 333 SW 1st Street, Portland, OR 97204. This document is also available on-line at the url < http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/aq >. Suggested citation: Geiser, L. 2004. Monitoring Air Quality Using Lichens on National Forests of the Pacific Northwest: Methods and Strategy. USDA-Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Technical Paper, R6-NR-AQ-TP-1-04. 134 pp. The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activates on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document records the methods used to survey lichen communities and to collect lichens for chemical analysis on national forests of the Pacific Northwest during the 1990s for air quality indication. Individualized sampling strategies for nine national forests provide a synopsis of local and semi-regional emission sources with potential to adversely affect Forest ecosystems, monitoring priorities, maps of survey site locations, and rotation schedules for remeasurements. Current status of and trends in air quality, including ecological effects, can be indicated by repeat measurements using the same methodology. Data and reports from the first round of monitoring are available from the director of the USDA-Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Air Program, or from the air program website at http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/aq. Two additional sources for data retrieval are the Forest Service Natural Resources Information System and the Northwest Alliance for Computational Science and Engineering at Oregon State University, http://airlichen.nacse.org/. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This program was initiated by national forest staff Jon Martin, George Bush, Deigh Bates, Nancy Diaz, Tom Felando, Mike Kania, John Wade, Mary Zuschlag, Tom High, Doug Bright, Richard Helliwell, and John Szymoniak. Supported by Ken Snell, Jim Russell, Bob Bachman, Janice Peterson, and Susan Sater of the USFS Pacific Northwest Region Air Program, they envisioned a unified regional approach to biomonitoring air quality using lichens. The core methods of lichen community analysis utilized in this document were developed by Bruce McCune for the National Forest Health Monitoring Program. Peter Neitlich provided further assistance to ensure that the protocols described herein remain interfaceable with FHM data. Fred Rhoades created the basic framework that led to the section on chemical analysis. Peter Eldred produced the national forest maps using a base map developed by a USDI-BLM taskforce coordinated by Jeff Nighbert. Cooperation from the staff of the regional Current Vegetation Survey program, especially from Jeff Reis, John Teply, and Bob Brown was invaluable. Much appreciation is owed by all to the many skilled summer personnel who field-tested and implemented these methods on the national forests and to their direct supervisors. Special thanks to Jim Riley, Shanti Berryman, Pekka Halonen, and Doug Glavich for assistance with identifications, and to Anne Ingersoll for help in compiling the appendices, researching current emissions data, and editing the manuscript. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................... ii 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 LICHEN MONITORING BY THE USFS PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION AIR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM: HISTORY AND OBJECTIVES ................. 1 1.2 USFS RESPONSIBILITIES FOR AIR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT....................... 1 1.21 Federally legislated responsibilities................................................................................. 1 1.22 USFS Air Resource Management policy......................................................................... 2 1.23 Regional Air Resource Management guidelines ............................................................. 3 1.3 LICHENS AS BIOMONITORS OF AIR QUALITY ...................................................... 3 1.31 Monitoring sulfur, nitrogen and metals via chemical analysis of lichens. ...................... 3 1.32 Sensitivity of lichens to air pollutants. ............................................................................ 4 1.33 Lichen monitoring guidelines for US federal land managers.......................................... 5 2. METHODS ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................... 5 2.11 Field protocols and training procedures .......................................................................... 5 2.12 Quality assurance and quality control ............................................................................. 5 2.13 Selection of plot locations ............................................................................................... 5 2.15 Monitoring frequency...................................................................................................... 6 2.16 Reporting......................................................................................................................... 6 2.17 Supplemental monitoring and other uses of lichen information...................................... 6 2.2 TISSUE COLLECTION AND ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHODS............................ 7 2.21 Sample collection procedure ........................................................................................... 7 2.22 Sample preservation and storage ..................................................................................... 9 2.23 Sample delivery............................................................................................................... 9 2.24 Common problems and solutions .................................................................................. 10 2.25 Equipment and supplies................................................................................................. 10 2.26 Interferences .................................................................................................................. 11 2.27 Safety............................................................................................................................. 11 2.28 Quality control and performance standards................................................................... 11 2.29 Specialist procedures..................................................................................................... 12 2.3 LABORATORY ANALYSIS ........................................................................................... 12 2.31 Sulfur............................................................................................................................. 12 2.32 Nitrogen......................................................................................................................... 12 2.33 Aluminum, boron, cadmium, calcium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, nickel, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, and zinc.............................................. 13 2.34 Barium, beryllium, cobalt, lithium, molybdenum, rubidium, silicon, strontium, titanium, and vanadium ........................................................................................................................ 13 2.35 Ash................................................................................................................................. 13 2.36 Fluoride ......................................................................................................................... 14 2.37 Mercury ........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Lichens' Microbiota, Still a Mystery?

    The Lichens' Microbiota, Still a Mystery?

    fmicb-12-623839 March 24, 2021 Time: 15:25 # 1 REVIEW published: 30 March 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.623839 The Lichens’ Microbiota, Still a Mystery? Maria Grimm1*, Martin Grube2, Ulf Schiefelbein3, Daniela Zühlke1, Jörg Bernhardt1 and Katharina Riedel1 1 Institute of Microbiology, University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany, 2 Institute of Plant Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University Graz, Graz, Austria, 3 Botanical Garden, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany Lichens represent self-supporting symbioses, which occur in a wide range of terrestrial habitats and which contribute significantly to mineral cycling and energy flow at a global scale. Lichens usually grow much slower than higher plants. Nevertheless, lichens can contribute substantially to biomass production. This review focuses on the lichen symbiosis in general and especially on the model species Lobaria pulmonaria L. Hoffm., which is a large foliose lichen that occurs worldwide on tree trunks in undisturbed forests with long ecological continuity. In comparison to many other lichens, L. pulmonaria is less tolerant to desiccation and highly sensitive to air pollution. The name- giving mycobiont (belonging to the Ascomycota), provides a protective layer covering a layer of the green-algal photobiont (Dictyochloropsis reticulata) and interspersed cyanobacterial cell clusters (Nostoc spec.). Recently performed metaproteome analyses Edited by: confirm the partition of functions in lichen partnerships. The ample functional diversity Nathalie Connil, Université de Rouen, France of the mycobiont contrasts the predominant function of the photobiont in production Reviewed by: (and secretion) of energy-rich carbohydrates, and the cyanobiont’s contribution by Dirk Benndorf, nitrogen fixation. In addition, high throughput and state-of-the-art metagenomics and Otto von Guericke University community fingerprinting, metatranscriptomics, and MS-based metaproteomics identify Magdeburg, Germany Guilherme Lanzi Sassaki, the bacterial community present on L.
  • Broad-Scale Distribution of Epiphytic Hair Lichens Correlates More with Climate and Nitrogen Deposition Than with Forest Structure P.-A

    Broad-Scale Distribution of Epiphytic Hair Lichens Correlates More with Climate and Nitrogen Deposition Than with Forest Structure P.-A

    1348 ARTICLE Broad-scale distribution of epiphytic hair lichens correlates more with climate and nitrogen deposition than with forest structure P.-A. Esseen, M. Ekström, B. Westerlund, K. Palmqvist, B.G. Jonsson, A. Grafström, and G. Ståhl Abstract: Hair lichens are strongly influenced by forest structure at local scales, but their broad-scale distributions are less under- stood. We compared the occurrence and length of Alectoria sarmentosa (Ach.) Ach., Bryoria spp., and Usnea spp. in the lower canopy of > 5000 Picea abies (L.) Karst. trees within the National Forest Inventory across all productive forest in Sweden. We used logistic regression to analyse how climate, nitrogen deposition, and forest variables influence lichen occurrence. Distributions overlapped, but the distribution of Bryoria was more northern and that of Usnea was more southern, with Alectoria's distribution being interme- diate. Lichen length increased towards northern regions, indicating better conditions for biomass accumulation. Logistic regression models had the highest pseudo R2 value for Bryoria, followed by Alectoria. Temperature and nitrogen deposition had higher explanatory power than precipitation and forest variables. Multiple logistic regressions suggest that lichen genera respond differently to increases in several variables. Warming decreased the odds for Bryoria occurrence at all temperatures. Corresponding odds for Alectoria and Usnea decreased in warmer climates, but in colder climates, they increased. Nitrogen addition decreased the odds for Alectoria and Usnea occurrence under high deposition, but under low deposition, the odds increased. Our analyses suggest major shifts in the broad-scale distribution of hair lichens with changes in climate, nitrogen deposition, and forest management. Key words: climate change, epiphytic lichens, forest structure, nitrogen deposition, temperature.
  • Checklist of Lichenicolous Fungi and Lichenicolous Lichens of Svalbard, Including New Species, New Records and Revisions

    Checklist of Lichenicolous Fungi and Lichenicolous Lichens of Svalbard, Including New Species, New Records and Revisions

    Herzogia 26 (2), 2013: 323 –359 323 Checklist of lichenicolous fungi and lichenicolous lichens of Svalbard, including new species, new records and revisions Mikhail P. Zhurbenko* & Wolfgang von Brackel Abstract: Zhurbenko, M. P. & Brackel, W. v. 2013. Checklist of lichenicolous fungi and lichenicolous lichens of Svalbard, including new species, new records and revisions. – Herzogia 26: 323 –359. Hainesia bryonorae Zhurb. (on Bryonora castanea), Lichenochora caloplacae Zhurb. (on Caloplaca species), Sphaerellothecium epilecanora Zhurb. (on Lecanora epibryon), and Trimmatostroma cetrariae Brackel (on Cetraria is- landica) are described as new to science. Forty four species of lichenicolous fungi (Arthonia apotheciorum, A. aspicili- ae, A. epiphyscia, A. molendoi, A. pannariae, A. peltigerina, Cercidospora ochrolechiae, C. trypetheliza, C. verrucosar- ia, Dacampia engeliana, Dactylospora aeruginosa, D. frigida, Endococcus fusiger, E. sendtneri, Epibryon conductrix, Epilichen glauconigellus, Lichenochora coppinsii, L. weillii, Lichenopeltella peltigericola, L. santessonii, Lichenostigma chlaroterae, L. maureri, Llimoniella vinosa, Merismatium decolorans, M. heterophractum, Muellerella atricola, M. erratica, Pronectria erythrinella, Protothelenella croceae, Skyttella mulleri, Sphaerellothecium parmeliae, Sphaeropezia santessonii, S. thamnoliae, Stigmidium cladoniicola, S. collematis, S. frigidum, S. leucophlebiae, S. mycobilimbiae, S. pseudopeltideae, Taeniolella pertusariicola, Tremella cetrariicola, Xenonectriella lutescens, X. ornamentata,
  • Monitoring Air Quality in Class I Wilderness Areas of the Northeastern United States Using Lichens and Bryophytes Alison C

    Monitoring Air Quality in Class I Wilderness Areas of the Northeastern United States Using Lichens and Bryophytes Alison C

    United States Department of Agriculture Monitoring Air Quality in Class I Wilderness Areas of the Northeastern United States Using Lichens and Bryophytes Alison C. Dibble, James W. Hinds, Ralph Perron, Natalie Cleavitt, Richard L. Poirot, and Linda H. Pardo Forest Service Northern Research Station General Technical Report NRS-165 December 2016 1 Abstract To address a need for air quality and lichen monitoring information for the Northeast, we compared bulk chemistry data from 2011-2013 to baseline surveys from 1988 and 1993 in three Class I Wilderness areas of New Hampshire and Vermont. Plots were within the White Mountain National Forest (Presidential Range—Dry River Wilderness and Great Gulf Wilderness, New Hampshire) and the Green Mountain National Forest (Lye Brook Wilderness, Vermont). We sampled epiphyte communities and found 58 macrolichen species and 55 bryophyte species. We also analyzed bulk samples for total N, total S, and 27 additional elements. We detected a decrease in Pb at the level of the National Forest and in a subset of plots. Low lichen richness and poor thallus condition at Lye Brook corresponded to higher N and S levels at these sites. Lichen thallus condition was best where lichen species richness was also high. Highest Hg content, from a limited subset, was on the east slope of Mt. Washington near the head of Great Gulf. Most dominant lichens in good condition were associated with conifer boles or acidic substrates. The status regarding N and S tolerance for many lichens in the northeastern United States is not clear, so the influence of N pollution on community data cannot be fully assessed.
  • Morphological Traits in Hair Lichens Affect Their Water Storage

    Morphological Traits in Hair Lichens Affect Their Water Storage

    Morphological traits in hair lichens affect their water storage Therese Olsson Student Degree Thesis in Biology 30 ECTS Master’s Level Report passed: 29 August 2014 Supervisor: Per-Anders Esseen Abstract The aim with this study was to develop a method to estimate total area of hair lichens and to compare morphological traits and water storage in them. Hair lichens are an important component of the epiphytic flora in boreal forests. Their growth is primarily regulated by available water, and light when hydrated. Lichens have no active mechanism to regulate their 2 water content and their water holding capacity (WHC, mg H2O/cm ) is thus an important factor for how long they remain wet and metabolically active. In this study, the water uptake and loss in five hair lichens (Alectoria sarmentosa, three Bryoria spp. and Usnea dasypoga) were compared. Their area were estimated by combining photography, scanning and a computer programme that estimates the area of objects. Total area overlap of individual branches was calculated for each species, to estimate total area of the lichen. WHC and specific thallus mass (STM) (mg DM/cm2) of the lichens were calculated. Bryoria spp. had a significantly lower STM compared to U. dasypoga and A. sarmentosa, due to its thinner branches and higher branch density. Bryoria also had a lower WHC compared to A. sarmentosa, promoting a rapid uptake and loss of water. All species had a significant relationship between STM and WHC, above a 1:1 line for all species except U. dasypoga. The lower relationship in U. dasypoga is explained by its less developed branching in combination with its thick branches.
  • Pannariaceae Generic Taxonomy LL Ver. 27.9.2013.Docx

    Pannariaceae Generic Taxonomy LL Ver. 27.9.2013.Docx

    http://www.diva-portal.org Preprint This is the submitted version of a paper published in The Lichenologist. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Ekman, S. (2014) Extended phylogeny and a revised generic classification of the Pannariaceae (Peltigerales, Ascomycota). The Lichenologist, 46: 627-656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002428291400019X Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-943 Extended phylogeny and a revised generic classification of the Pannariaceae (Peltigerales, Ascomycota) Stefan EKMAN, Mats WEDIN, Louise LINDBLOM & Per M. JØRGENSEN S. Ekman (corresponding author): Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE –75236 Uppsala, Sweden. Email: [email protected] M. Wedin: Dept. of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE –10405 Stockholm, Sweden. L. Lindblom and P. M. Jørgensen: Dept. of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen, Box 7800, NO –5020 Bergen, Norway. Abstract: We estimated phylogeny in the lichen-forming ascomycete family Pannariaceae. We specifically modelled spatial (across-site) heterogeneity in nucleotide frequencies, as models not incorporating this heterogeneity were found to be inadequate for our data. Model adequacy was measured here as the ability of the model to reconstruct nucleotide diversity per site in the original sequence data. A potential non-orthologue in the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) of Degelia plumbea was observed. We propose a revised generic classification for the Pannariaceae, accepting 30 genera, based on our phylogeny, previously published phylogenies, as well as morphological and chemical data available.
  • Revisions of British and Irish Lichens

    Revisions of British and Irish Lichens

    Revisions of British and Irish Lichens Volume 9 February 2021 Peltigerales: Pannariaceae Cover image: Pectenia atlantica, on bark of Fraxinus excelsior, Strath Croe, Kintail, Wester Ross. Revisions of British and Irish Lichens is a free-to-access serial publication under the auspices of the British Lichen Society, that charts changes in our understanding of the lichens and lichenicolous fungi of Great Britain and Ireland. Each volume will be devoted to a particular family (or group of families), and will include descriptions, keys, habitat and distribution data for all the species included. The maps are based on information from the BLS Lichen Database, that also includes data from the historical Mapping Scheme and the Lichen Ireland database. The choice of subject for each volume will depend on the extent of changes in classification for the families concerned, and the number of newly recognized species since previous treatments. To date, accounts of lichens from our region have been published in book form. However, the time taken to compile new printed editions of the entire lichen biota of Britain and Ireland is extensive, and many parts are out-of-date even as they are published. Issuing updates as a serial electronic publication means that important changes in understanding of our lichens can be made available with a shorter delay. The accounts may also be compiled at intervals into complete printed accounts, as new editions of the Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland. Editorial Board Dr P.F. Cannon (Department of Taxonomy & Biodiversity, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK). Dr A. Aptroot (Laboratório de Botânica/Liquenologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Avenida Costa e Silva s/n, Bairro Universitário, CEP 79070-900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil) Dr B.J.
  • Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska

    Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska

    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Kaleigh Spickerman for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on June 11, 2015 Title: Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Bruce McCune Functional traits of vascular plants have been an important component of ecological studies for a number of years; however, in more recent times vascular plant ecologists have begun to formalize a set of key traits and universal system of trait measurement. Many recent studies hypothesize global generality of trait patterns, which would allow for comparison among ecosystems and biomes and provide a foundation for general rules and theories, the so-called “Holy Grail” of ecology. However, the majority of these studies focus on functional trait patterns of vascular plants, with a minority examining the patterns of cryptograms such as lichens. Lichens are an important component of many ecosystems due to their contributions to biodiversity and their key ecosystem services, such as contributions to mineral and hydrological cycles and ecosystem food webs. Lichens are also of special interest because of their reliance on atmospheric deposition for nutrients and water, which makes them particularly sensitive to air pollution. Therefore, they are often used as bioindicators of air pollution, climate change, and general ecosystem health. This thesis examines the functional trait patterns of lichens in two contrasting regions with fundamentally different kinds of data. To better understand the patterns of lichen functional traits, we examined reproductive, morphological, and chemical trait variation along precipitation and temperature gradients in Oregon.
  • H. Thorsten Lumbsch VP, Science & Education the Field Museum 1400

    H. Thorsten Lumbsch VP, Science & Education the Field Museum 1400

    H. Thorsten Lumbsch VP, Science & Education The Field Museum 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive Chicago, Illinois 60605 USA Tel: 1-312-665-7881 E-mail: [email protected] Research interests Evolution and Systematics of Fungi Biogeography and Diversification Rates of Fungi Species delimitation Diversity of lichen-forming fungi Professional Experience Since 2017 Vice President, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago. USA 2014-2017 Director, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2014 Curator, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2013-2014 Associate Director, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2009-2013 Chair, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2011 MacArthur Associate Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2006-2014 Associate Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2005-2009 Head of Cryptogams, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2004 Member, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago. Courses: BIOS 430 Evolution (UIC), BIOS 23410 Complex Interactions: Coevolution, Parasites, Mutualists, and Cheaters (U of C) Reading group: Phylogenetic methods. 2003-2006 Assistant Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 1998-2003 Privatdozent (Assistant Professor), Botanical Institute, University – GHS - Essen. Lectures: General Botany, Evolution of lower plants, Photosynthesis, Courses: Cryptogams, Biology
  • Habitat Quality and Disturbance Drive Lichen Species Richness in a Temperate Biodiversity Hotspot

    Habitat Quality and Disturbance Drive Lichen Species Richness in a Temperate Biodiversity Hotspot

    Oecologia (2019) 190:445–457 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04413-0 COMMUNITY ECOLOGY – ORIGINAL RESEARCH Habitat quality and disturbance drive lichen species richness in a temperate biodiversity hotspot Erin A. Tripp1,2 · James C. Lendemer3 · Christy M. McCain1,2 Received: 23 April 2018 / Accepted: 30 April 2019 / Published online: 15 May 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract The impacts of disturbance on biodiversity and distributions have been studied in many systems. Yet, comparatively less is known about how lichens–obligate symbiotic organisms–respond to disturbance. Successful establishment and development of lichens require a minimum of two compatible yet usually unrelated species to be present in an environment, suggesting disturbance might be particularly detrimental. To address this gap, we focused on lichens, which are obligate symbiotic organ- isms that function as hubs of trophic interactions. Our investigation was conducted in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. We conducted complete biodiversity inventories of lichens (all growth forms, reproductive modes, substrates) across 47, 1-ha plots to test classic models of responses to disturbance (e.g., linear, unimodal). Disturbance was quantifed in each plot using a standardized suite of habitat quality variables. We additionally quantifed woody plant diversity, forest density, rock density, as well as environmental factors (elevation, temperature, precipitation, net primary productivity, slope, aspect) and analyzed their impacts on lichen biodiversity. Our analyses recovered a strong, positive, linear relationship between lichen biodiversity and habitat quality: lower levels of disturbance correlate to higher species diversity. With few exceptions, additional variables failed to signifcantly explain variation in diversity among plots for the 509 total lichen species, but we caution that total variation in some of these variables was limited in our study area.
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska

    Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska

    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.
  • CBD First National Report

    CBD First National Report

    FIRST NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY July 2010 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 4 2. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Geographic Profile .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate Profile ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Population Profile ................................................................................................. 7 2.4 Economic Profile .................................................................................................. 7 3 THE BIODIVERSITY OF SERBIA .............................................................................. 8 3.1 Overview......................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Ecosystem and Habitat Diversity .................................................................... 8 3.3 Species Diversity ............................................................................................ 9 3.4 Genetic Diversity ............................................................................................. 9 3.5 Protected Areas .............................................................................................10