DOCSLIB.ORG

Method for the Assessment of Priorities for International Species Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Method for the Assessment of Priorities for International Species Conservation METHOD FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF PRIORITIES FOR INTERNATIONAL SPECIES CONSERVATION (MAPISCo) Final Report March 2013 Project Team Matthew Grainger (Newcastle University) Phil McGowan (Newcastle University) Ailsa McKenzie (Newcastle University) Jeroen Minderman (Newcastle University) Jon-Paul Rodriguez (IUCN-SSC) Alison Rosser (UNEP-WCMC) Andy South (Freelance) Selina Stead (Newcastle University) Mark Whittingham (Newcastle University) Steering Group Vin Fleming (JNCC) Noel McGough (RBG Kew) Trevor Salmon (Defra) Michael Sigsworth (Defra) Andy Stott (Defra) Dominic Whitmee (Defra) MAPISCo Final report: Table of contents Table of contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 4 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 9 2.1. Background ............................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2. Why is this method necessary? The link between policy demands and scientific capability ................. 10 2.3. Outline of the proposed project ..................................................................................................................................... 11 3. DEVELOPMENT OF THE METHOD ...................................................................................... 12 3.1. Selection of co-benefits ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.2. Focal co-benefits, data sets used and sources & category scoring..................................................................... 13 3.2.1. Habitat and area conservation (Aichi Targets 5 and 7) .................................................................................................... 13 3.2.2. Sustainable harvesting (Aichi Target 6) .................................................................................................................................. 15 3.2.3. Conservation of genetic diversity (Aichi Target 13) .......................................................................................................... 17 3.2.4. Protection of ecosystem services (Aichi Target 14) .......................................................................................................... 18 3.2.5. Preventing species extinction (Aichi Target 12) ................................................................................................................. 20 3.3. Database & prioritisation ................................................................................................................................................. 22 3.3.1. Database building .............................................................................................................................................................................. 22 3.3.2. Co-benefit weighting, re-scaling and priority score calculation ................................................................................... 22 3.4. Inclusion of red list threat classification data ........................................................................................................... 24 4. RESULTS - EXAMPLE PRIORITY LISTS .................................................................................. 27 4.1. Example 1: All species ........................................................................................................................................................ 30 4.1.1. Summary findings ............................................................................................................................................................................. 30 4.1.2. Taxonomic composition ................................................................................................................................................................. 30 4.1.3. Geographic composition ................................................................................................................................................................. 30 4.1.4. IUCN threat categories and classifications ............................................................................................................................. 30 4.1.5. Co-benefits ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 31 4.2. Example 2: Taxonomic case study – birds .................................................................................................................. 36 4.2.1. Summary findings ............................................................................................................................................................................. 36 4.2.2. Orders and Families.......................................................................................................................................................................... 36 4.2.3. Country/region ................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 4.2.4. IUCN Red List threat categories and classifications ........................................................................................................... 36 4.2.5. Co-benefits ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 37 4.2.6. Key findings and how they relate to policy ............................................................................................................................ 37 4.3. Example 3: Geographic case study – SE Asia .............................................................................................................. 44 4.3.1. General findings ................................................................................................................................................................................. 44 4.3.2. Taxonomic composition ................................................................................................................................................................. 44 4.3.3. Geographic composition ................................................................................................................................................................. 44 4.3.4. IUCN Red List threat categories and classifications ........................................................................................................... 44 4.3.5. Co-benefits ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 45 4.3.6. Key findings and how they relate to policy ............................................................................................................................ 45 5. USING THE METHOD ............................................................................................................. 50 2 MAPISCo Final report: Table of contents 5.1. Expandable –How does the does the priority list respond to the inclusion of additional co-benefit data? A plant example. ............................................................................................................................................................... 50 5.2. Adaptable - How does the priority list respond to changes in co-benefit weightings? .............................. 51 5.2.1. Sensitivity analysis ............................................................................................................................................................................ 51 5.2.2. Worked examples – threat status and ecosystem services ............................................................................................. 51 5.3. Usable - Development of Graphic User Interface (GUI) ......................................................................................... 54 5.3.1. GUI Development ............................................................................................................................................................................... 54 5.3.2. Constraints and legacy .................................................................................................................................................................... 55 5.3.3. Future development options ........................................................................................................................................................ 55 5.3.4. Future hosting options .................................................................................................................................................................... 56 6. DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................................... 57 6.1. Fit to original project brief ............................................................................................................................................... 57 6.2. How does the method compare with ‘business as usual’? ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guttera Pucherani Were Also Obtained from Rossouwof (1996)
    The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the Helmeted Guineafowl (Numida me/eagris) by Jonathan van Alphen-Stahl Town Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for theCape degree of of Master of Science in the UniversityFaculty of Science University of Cape Town Cape Town Supervisor: Prof. T. M. Crowe Co-supervisor: Assoc. Prof. P. Bloomer 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisors Tim Crowe and Paulette Bloomer. Tim, thank you for the opportunity to work on this project as well as your patience and perseverance. Paulette, thanks for your friendly advice and help throughout the project, particularly in the draft stages. Thanks must also go out to all the wingshooters who provided samples of guineafowl from across Africa. To all the members of lab MEEP thank you for accepting me into the lab and making me feel welcome. In particular: Lisel Solms for getting me started in the lab, Carel Oosthuizen for sorting out the admin. in the lab and with the university, as well as being roomy for a while, Wayne Oelport for help with analysis and computer related issues, as well as a golf buddy. A mention must also go to Michael Cunningham for project advice and late night games of hallway footy, Marina Alais and Isa-Rita Russo for the drinks we shared of an evening.
    [Show full text]
  • Bushmeat in Gabon
    Bushmeat in Gabon December 2010 Katharine Abernethy Anne Marie Ndong Obiang 1 Part 1 Executive Summary Table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 3 1.1 THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR BUSHMEAT MANAGEMENT IN GABON ............................................... 3 1.2 SUMMARY OF HUNTER PRACTICES ............................................................................................... 6 1.3 THE COMMODITY CHAIN ............................................................................................................ 7 1.4 BUSHMEAT PURCHASE AND CONSUMPTION .................................................................................. 9 1.5 WILDLIFE ................................................................................................................................ 10 1.6 LEGALITY, MANAGEMENT, CONTROL AND SUSTAINABILITY ............................................................. 11 2 HUNTER PRACTICES ............................................................................................... 13 2.1 WHO IS HUNTING? .................................................................................................................. 13 2.2 HOW ARE VILLAGERS HUNTING? ................................................................................................ 15 2.3 WHERE ARE VILLAGERS HUNTING? ............................................................................................. 17 2.4 WHAT IS BEING HUNTED? ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 – Original Contract Specification
    MAPISCo Final report: Appendix 1 – Original contract specification Appendices Appendix 1 – Original contract specification Methodology for Assessment of priorities for international species conservation (MAPISCo) Competition Details and Project Specification Competition Code: WC1017 Date for return of tenders: 2nd August 2011 Address for tender submission: Competition Code: WC1017 (the Competition Code must be shown Defra on the envelope and the tender Natural Environment Science Team submitted in line with the instructions in Zone 1/14 the attached guidance, otherwise your Temple Quay House tender may not be accepted) 2 The Square Temple Quay Bristol BS1 6EB Number of electronic & hard copies 1 copy on CD-ROM or 3½” disk, plus required: [2] hard copies Contact for information relating to this Name: Dominic Whitmee project specification: Tel no: 0117 372 3597 e-mail: [email protected] Proposed ownership of Intellectual Defra Property (contractor or Defra): Proposed start-date (if known): September 2011 Proposed end-date (if known): September 2012 Project Specification BACKGROUND The UK government is committed to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. A wide range of domestic policies and national and EU legislation are in place which contribute to this objective and assist in the conservation of threatened species, habitats and ecosystems, either directly such as measures that control the keeping or sale of specified species, or indirectly such as controls on the release of pollutants into water courses or the atmosphere. Internationally the UK is a significant player in a number of multilateral environment agreements and related initiatives which aim to support the conservation and sustainable use of species, habitats and ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Vital but Vulnerable: Climate Change Vulnerability and Human Use of Wildlife in Africa’S Albertine Rift
    Vital but vulnerable: Climate change vulnerability and human use of wildlife in Africa’s Albertine Rift J.A. Carr, W.E. Outhwaite, G.L. Goodman, T.E.E. Oldfield and W.B. Foden Occasional Paper for the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 48 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or the compilers concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or other participating organizations. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2013 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Carr, J.A., Outhwaite, W.E., Goodman, G.L., Oldfield, T.E.E. and Foden, W.B. 2013. Vital but vulnerable: Climate change vulnerability and human use of wildlife in Africa’s Albertine Rift. Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 48. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. xii + 224pp. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1591-9 Front cover: A Burundian fisherman makes a good catch. © R. Allgayer and A. Sapoli. Back cover: © T. Knowles Available from: IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Publications Services Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland Switzerland Tel +41 22 999 0000 Fax +41 22 999 0020 [email protected] www.iucn.org/publications Also available at http://www.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/SSC-OP-048.pdf About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution Et Adaptation Fonctionnelle Des Arbres Tropicaux : Le Cas Du Genre Guibourtia Benn
    EVOLUTION ET ADAPTATION FONCTIONNELLE DES ARBRES TROPICAUX : LE CAS DU GENRE GUIBOURTIA BENN. FELICIEN TOSSO COMMUNAUTE FRANÇAISE DE BELGIQUE UNIVERSITE DE LIEGE – GEMBLOUX AGRO-BIO TECH EVOLUTION ET ADAPTATION FONCTIONNELLE DES ARBRES TROPICAUX : LE CAS DU GENRE GUIBOURTIA BENN. Dji-ndé Félicien TOSSO Dissertation originale présentée en vue de l’obtention du grade de docteur en sciences agronomiques et ingénierie biologique Co-Promoteurs : Prof. Jean-Louis Doucet et Dr. Olivier J. Hardy Année 2018 Copyright Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons. Vous êtes libre de reproduire, de modifier, de distribuer et de communiquer cette création au public selon les conditions suivantes : - paternité (BY) : vous devez citer le nom de l'auteur original de la manière indiquée par l'auteur de l'œuvre ou le titulaire des droits qui vous confère cette autorisation (mais pas d'une manière qui suggérerait qu'ils vous soutiennent ou approuvent votre utilisation de l'œuvre) ; - pas d'utilisation commerciale (NC) : vous n'avez pas le droit d'utiliser cette création à des fins commerciales ; - partage des conditions initiales à l'identique (SA) : si vous modifiez, transformez ou adaptez cette création, vous n'avez le droit de distribuer la création qui en résulte que sous un contrat identique à celui-ci. À chaque réutilisation ou distribution de cette création, vous devez faire apparaitre clairement au public les conditions contractuelles de sa mise à disposition. Chacune de ces conditions peut être levée si vous obtenez l'autorisation du titulaire des droits sur cette œuvre. Rien dans ce contrat ne diminue ou ne restreint le droit moral de l’auteur.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Surveys in the Gamba Complex of Protected Areas, Gabon
    Bird Surveys in the Gamba Complex of Protected Areas, Gabon George ANGEHR1, Brian SCHMIDT2, Francis NJIE3, Patrice CHRISTY4, Christina GEBHARD2, Landry TCHIGNOUMBA5 and Martin A.E. OMBENOTORI6 1 Introduction status of protected areas within the complex was revised, and two areas, Loango and Moukalaba- Approximately 2,100 species of birds are known from Doudou, were upgraded to National Parks. An analy- Africa south of the Sahara. Gabon is fairly well known sis by BirdLife International (Christy 2001) found the ornithologically, the first collections having been made Gamba Complex to qualify as one of Gabon’s six by du Chaillu as early as the 1850s. To date, 678 Important Bird Areas (IBAs). Important Bird Areas species have been recorded in the country (Christy are areas that have been determined to be most impor- 2001), or about 30% of the total known for sub- tant for the conservation of birds at the global level, Saharan Africa. Gabon’s bird diversity is relatively lim- based on the distribution of endangered, endemic, ited compared to some other Afrotropical countries, habitat-restricted, and congregatory species. such as Cameroon, which has more than 900 species. Despite its importance, there has been relatively lit- The main factors involved include its relatively small tle published ornithological work on the Gamba size and lack of habitat and topographic diversity. The Complex. Sargeant (1993) was resident at Gamba for natural vegetation of most of Gabon is lowland ever- five years and compiled a bird list for the immediate green and semi-evergreen forest, with only limited area, and as well as lists for other localities within the areas of savanna in the east and south, and its maxi- Complex, including Rabi, the Rembo (River) Ndogo, mum elevation is 1,575 m, compared to 4,095 m for and the east side of the Moukalaba Faunal Reserve, Cameroon.
    [Show full text]
  • Squandering Paradise?
    THREATS TO PROTECTED AREAS SQUANDERING PARADISE? The importance and vulnerability of the world’s protected areas By Christine Carey, Nigel Dudley and Sue Stolton Published May 2000 By WWF-World Wide Fund For Nature (Formerly World Wildlife Fund) International, Gland, Switzerland Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must mention the title and credit the above- mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. © 2000, WWF - World Wide Fund For Nature (Formerly World Wildlife Fund) ® WWF Registered Trademark WWF's mission is to stop the degradation of the planet's natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by: · conserving the world's biological diversity · ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable · promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption Front cover photograph © Edward Parker, UK The photograph is of fire damage to a forest in the National Park near Andapa in Madagascar Cover design Helen Miller, HMD, UK 1 THREATS TO PROTECTED AREAS Preface It would seem to be stating the obvious to say that protected areas are supposed to protect. When we hear about the establishment of a new national park or nature reserve we conservationists breathe a sigh of relief and assume that the biological and cultural values of another area are now secured. Unfortunately, this is not necessarily true. Protected areas that appear in government statistics and on maps are not always put in place on the ground. Many of those that do exist face a disheartening array of threats, ranging from the immediate impacts of poaching or illegal logging to subtle effects of air pollution or climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird List for Gabon Mammal Watching Tour August 2018
    Bird List for Gabon Mammal Watching Tour August 2018 PART A – CONTEXT of the RECORDS 1. INTRODUCTION This narrative, ie ‘PART A’, puts the birding in context – ie the birds recorded (by some of the tour participants) on a highly focused and successful Gabon mammal watching tour – and provides the framework for the actual bird list given in ‘PART B’. The bird sightings were essentially a by-catch of the mammal watching activities whereby targeted birding only occurred during periods of relative mammal watching downtime. At other times the birding was largely passive and opportunistic and did not disrupt the flow and objectives of the primary mammal watching programme. As such, the number of bird species recorded (seen = 181 over 16 days (Sat 11 to Sun 26 Aug 218)) was lower than would be expected on a more formal birding tour (300+). None of the sightings are unusual and would not be considered controversial. The core recording was undertaken by Sjef Ollers (Eindhoven, Netherlands) and Kevin Bryan (Southampton, UK); with over 90% of the ‘seen’ species being recorded by both individuals. Most of the birds were found by sight. In a few cases, sound recordings were used (eg for Rufous-sided Broadbill (Smithornis rufolateralis)). However, time was not usually available to do this. Very significantly, a few birds were first found by Pulsar heat-scopes whilst their operators were looking for mammals; in particular, Black Guineafowl (Agelastes niger). 2. SITES 2.1 Provinces and Areas Visited – this Tour Fig 1 The Nine Provinces of Gabon The Provinces (with their capital) Libreville is both the national and a provincial capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Missing Links in Global Host-Parasite Networks
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.25.965046; this version posted May 18, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Predicting missing links in global host-parasite networks Maxwell J. Farrell1;2;3∗, Mohamad Elmasri4, David Stephens4 & T. Jonathan Davies5;6 1Department of Biology, McGill University 2Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Department, University of Toronto 3Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia 4Department of Mathematics & Statistics, McGill University 5Botany, Forest & Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia 6African Centre for DNA Barcoding, University of Johannesburg ∗To whom correspondence should be addressed: e-mail: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.25.965046; this version posted May 18, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Abstract 1 1. Parasites that infect multiple species cause major health burdens globally, but for many, 2 the full suite of susceptible hosts is unknown. Predicting undocumented host-parasite 3 associations will help expand knowledge of parasite host specificities, promote the devel- 4 opment of theory in disease ecology and evolution, and support surveillance of multi-host 5 infectious diseases. Analysis of global species interaction networks allows for leveraging 6 of information across taxa, but link prediction at this scale is often limited by extreme 7 network sparsity, and lack of comparable trait data across species.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameroon Rep 11
    CAMEROON 6 MARCH – 2 APRIL 2011 TOUR REPORT LEADER: NIK BORROW Cameroon may not be a tour for those who like their creature comforts but it certainly produces a huge bird list and if one intends to only ever visit one western African country then this is surely an essential destination. Our comprehensive itinerary covers a superb and wide range of the varied habitats that this sprawling country has to offer. Despite unexpectedly missing some species this year, perhaps due to the result of the previous rainy season coming late with the result that everywhere was greener but somehow inexplicably drier we nonetheless amassed an impressive total of 572 species or recognisable forms of which all but 15 were seen. These included 26 of the regional endemics; Cameroon Olive Pigeon, Bannerman’s Turaco, Mountain Saw-wing, Cameroon Montane, Western Mountain, Cameroon Olive and Grey-headed Greenbuls, Alexander’s (split from Bocage’s) Akalat, Mountain Robin Chat, Cameroon and Bangwa Forest Warblers, Brown-backed Cisticola, Green Longtail, Bamenda Apalis, White-tailed Warbler, Black-capped Woodland Warbler, Banded Wattle-eye, White-throated Mountain Babbler, Cameroon and Ursula’s Sunbirds, Mount Cameroon Speirops, Green-breasted and Mount Kupe Bush-shrikes, Yellow-breasted Boubou, Bannerman’s Weaver and Shelley’s Oliveback. This year we once again found the recently rediscovered Chad Firefinch and the restricted range Rock Firefinch (first discovered in the country in 2005 by Birdquest). We found several Quail-plovers and a male Savile’s Bustard in the Waza area as well as a wonderful Green-breasted/African Pitta, Black Guineafowl and Vermiculated Fishing Owl in Korup National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnoecology of Hunting in an Empty Forest. Practices, Local Perceptions and Social Change Among the Baka
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Ethnoecology of hunting in an empty forest. Practices, local perceptions and social change among the Baka (Cameroon) PhD Dissertation Romain Duda Under the supervision of: Dr. Victoria Reyes-García Dr. Serge Bahuchet PhD Programme in Environmental Science and Technology Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, ICTA Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, UAB June 2017 II British English spelling and conventions are used in this work. III IV Acknowledgments I first wish to express my sincere gratitude to Professor Victoria Reyes-García. Being supervised and supervised and encouraged by such an experienced scientist was a real chance. Thanks to her patient guidance, I overcame all the shortcomings of a fairly hybrid university cursus, and learned with her the codes of the academic writing and analytical methods. I am grateful to her for having accepted me thank the LEK project and, at the end, for reading and correcting so many proofs of this work until the last moment. Special thanks should be given to Professor Serge Bahuchet. This thesis highly benefited from his great experience, and his advice has always been useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Biotic Surveys of Bioko and Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea
    Biotic Surveys of Bioko and Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea Date: 25 June 1999 Submitted to: Biodiversity Support Program Submitted by: Brenda Larison1, Thomas B. Smith1,3 , Derek Girman2, Donald Stauffer1, Borja Milá1, Robert C. Drewes4, Charles E. Griswold5, Jens V. Vindum4, Darrell Ubick5, Kim O'Keefe1, Jose Nguema6, Lindsay Henwood4 1Center for Tropical Research 2Department of Biology San Francisco State University Sonoma State University San Francisco, CA 94132 USA Sonoma, CA 95476 USA (415) 338-1089 Tel (415) 338-0927 Fax [email protected] email 3Center for Population Biology 4Department of Herpetology University of California California Academy of Sciences Davis, CA 95616 USA San Francisco, CA 94118 USA 5Department of Entomology 6C.U.R.E.F. California Academy of Sciences APDO 207 San Francisco, CA 94118 USA Bata, Equatorial Guinea TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 5 PART I. BIOTIC SURVEYS OF RIO MUNI Chapter 1. Bird and Mammal surveys of Rio Muni INTRODUCTION 9 METHODS 9 RESULTS BIRD SURVEYS 16 MAMMAL SURVEYS 46 SOCIO- POLITICAL CONTEXT 51 DISCUSSION 53 PART II. BIOTIC SURVEYS OF BIOKO Chapter 2. Preliminary Report on a Survey of The Herpetofauna of Bioko, Equatorial Guinea INTRODUCTION 58 METHODS 58 RESULTS 58 TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS 60 Chapter 3. Arthropod surveys on Bioko, Equatorial Guinea INTRODUCTION 62 METHODS 62 RESULTS FLIES (DIPTERA) 63 CARABID BEETLES(C ARABIDAE) 64 SPIDERS (ARANEAE) 65 DISCUSSION OF TARGET TAXA 112 CONSERVATION IMPORTANCE OF BIOKO 114 PART III. B IOGEOGRAPHY ii Chapter 4. Comparative avian phylogeography of Cameroon andEquatorial Guinea mountains: implications for conservation INTRODUCTION 115 METHODS 116 RESULTS PHYLOGEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS 120 PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY ANALYSIS 121 GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF ENDEMISM 123 DISCUSSION 125 PART IV.
    [Show full text]