Lanes Opening Where Possible for July 4 Travel
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gilman Industrial Park Brochure
Illinois Gilman has an available 265 acre park waiting for you! o'Crossroadsof Opportunity" Location-Location-Location This 265 acre industrial park 90 miles south of Chicago is ideally located at the intersections of Interstate 57 US 24 and US 45. It is also bordered by the main lines for the TP&W (SantaFe) and Illinois Cenfal (CN) Railroads. The infrasffucture available is extensive. The property can be divided into lots to suit individual usersneeds. Shawn Coady Rick Theesfeld 204 N. Rt s4lP.O.Box98 215N. Central RobertsoIllinois 60962 Gilman, Illinois 60938 217-395-2281, 8t5-265-42t3 217-395-2572(Bax) 815-265-4640(Fax) INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE OR SCHEDULED/SPRING 2OO4 COMPLETED . 400,000 gallon vertical water storagetank on . Site Survey site . Topographicalmaps . Looped 12" x S" watermains in park . Illinois historical survey . 8" municipal sanitary sewer system . PhaseI Environmental . Two electrical serviceproviders with . Wetlands survey extensiveinfrastructure availablein the park . Drainage plans . 138 KV overhead . 69 KV overhead ECONOMIC INCENTIVES . 12 KV overhead . Substationlocated in the park Tax Increment Finance District Iroquois DevelopmentCouncil 8" natural gas service Local city incentives City streetaccess to the park 3 lane,concrete,40 foot curb and gutter RAIL SERVICE Lishted streetentrance . Illinois Central (CN) main line . Illinois Central (CN) Springfield line INTERSTATEACCESS . TP&W (SantaFe) , I-57,US-24, US-45 border the site . Switching yard in Gilman ELECTRIC WASTEWATER WATER AverageLoad Supplier 250,000gallons per Ameren CIPS day City of Gilman . 13,700MW Generation Design Capacity Source Capacity 500,000gallons per day 2DeepWells . Multiple interconnections Tlpe of Plant . ElevatedStorage Capacity Substationon site Primary . -
333 North Michigan Buildi·N·G- 333 N
PRELIMINARY STAFF SUfv1MARY OF INFORMATION 333 North Michigan Buildi·n·g- 333 N. Michigan Avenue Submitted to the Conwnission on Chicago Landmarks in June 1986. Rec:ornmended to the City Council on April I, 1987. CITY OF CHICAGO Richard M. Daley, Mayor Department of Planning and Development J.F. Boyle, Jr., Commissioner 333 NORTH MICIDGAN BUILDING 333 N. Michigan Ave. (1928; Holabird & Roche/Holabird & Root) The 333 NORTH MICHIGAN BUILDING is one of the city's most outstanding Art Deco-style skyscrapers. It is one of four buildings surrounding the Michigan A venue Bridge that defines one of the city' s-and nation' s-finest urban spaces. The building's base is sheathed in polished granite, in shades of black and purple. Its upper stories, which are set back in dramatic fashion to correspond to the city's 1923 zoning ordinance, are clad in buff-colored limestone and dark terra cotta. The building's prominence is heightened by its unique site. Due to the jog of Michigan Avenue at the bridge, the building is visible the length of North Michigan Avenue, appearing to be located in the center of the street. ABOVE: The 333 North Michigan Building was one of the first skyscrapers to take advantage of the city's 1923 zoning ordinance, which encouraged the construction of buildings with setback towers. This photograph was taken from the cupola of the London Guarantee Building. COVER: A 1933 illustration, looking south on Michigan Avenue. At left: the 333 North Michigan Building; at right the Wrigley Building. 333 NORTH MICHIGAN BUILDING 333 North Michigan Avenue Architect: Holabird and Roche/Holabird and Root Date of Construction: 1928 0e- ~ 1QQ 2 00 Cft T Dramatically sited where Michigan Avenue crosses the Chicago River are four build ings that collectively illustrate the profound stylistic changes that occurred in American architecture during the decade of the 1920s. -
Mansard Court Demolition Bid Package
VILLAGE OF OAK LAWN DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURE AT 11004 S. CICERO AVENUE INVITATION TO BID ADVERTISEMENT The Village of Oak Lawn, Illinois will receive bids no later than 2:00 p.m. on Sept 11th, 2013 (Illinois time zone) for demolition of the commercial structure commonly known as Mansard Court located at 11004-11016 South Cicero, Oak Lawn, Illinois. Sealed bid opening will occur at 2:15 pm on the same date at Oak Lawn Village Hall, 9446 S Raymond Avenue, Oak Lawn, Illinois 60453, in the Village Auditorium on the second floor of Village Hall. All quotes offered on this bid solicitation shall include materials, tools, and equipment necessary to complete the demolition of the structure. No bidder may withdraw their bid for a period of sixty days (60) after the scheduled closing time for receipt of the bids. Bidding documents can be downloaded at www.oaklawn-il.gov for free, or picked up at the Oak Lawn Building Division for $35.00 in the lower level of Village Hall at 9446 S. Raymond Avenue, Oak Lawn, IL 60453. The contractor is responsible for all notifications, permits, and fees for the demolition, and for asbestos removal (if applicable). Environmental documents are included with the bid documents. The Village makes no representation as to the accuracy of the environmental documents, reports, and no representations that there may or may not be different conditions on site. Bids are to be addressed to the Oak Lawn Village Clerk and mailed or delivered to the Clerk of the Village of Oak Lawn, 9446 S. -
Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ........................................................... -
Highway Plan Cook County
HIGHWAY PLAN FOR COOK COUNTY t e;: ,,., ~e.=, ~:: T ' <. J T - ._ ,... ' I: - I :: • k.. -:. - - <" ,. ' I \.. ' ,_, ~ J (.1~· ,, J) l' \.,i DETAILED STUDY OF H ·I G H W AV PL A N FOR COOK COUNTY PREPARED FOR THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF COOK BY THE COOK COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT GEORGE A. QUINLAN SUPERINTENDENT OF COUNTY HIGHWAYS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST, 1940 A STUDY OF THE SUPERHIGHWAY FINANCING BY COOK COUNTY ON A PAY AS YOU GO PLAN l l \ [ 3 ] The undertaking of the construction of that portion of the Superhighway System within the""Central Business District of Chicago by Cook County on a pay as you go basis would require the allocation of approximately 43% of its anticipated highway funds for the next 20 years. The construction of the several units of the system by the County would require a programming of the work in a manner similar to the following: Estimated Cost Unit in Millions Year No. Improvement of Dollars 1941 1 Tunnel Connection with Outer Drive-(Drive shore protection and place fill) . 5 1942 1 Tunnel Connection with Outer Drive-(Con- struct tunnels, pavements and landscaping) 3. 0 1943 2 Elm and Cedar Street tunnels-(Buy Right of Way) .8 1944 2 Elm and Cedar Street tunnels-(Construct Elm Street tuni;iel) 2. 9 1945 2 Elm and Cedar Street Tunnels-(Construct Cedar Street tunnel) 3 .0 1946 3 Northwest Superhighway-Sheffield to Division (Buy Right of Way and construct) 3.9 1947 4 Northwest Superhighway-Division to Chicago -(Buy Right of Way and construct) 1. -
2018 Invest in Cook Grant Program
2018 INVEST IN COOK Toni Preckwinkle, President Cook County Board of Commissioners Martha Martinez, Chief Administrative Officer Bureau of Administration John Yonan, P.E., Superintendent Department of Transportation & Highways 2018 INVEST IN COOK AWARDS PROJECT NAME APPLICANT PROJECT TYPE PROJECT PHASE AWARDED 78th Avenue Reconstruction Bridgeview Freight Preliminary Engineering $350,000 Braga Drive Improvements Broadview Freight Construction $145,000 31st Street Corridor Multimodal Brookfield Roadway Preliminary Engineering $85,000 Impact Study Burnham Greenway Trail Bike/Ped Burnham Bike/Ped Preliminary Engineering $50,000 Bridge Over Five Rail Lines Dolton Road/State Street/Plummer Calumet City Freight Preliminary Engineering $200,000 Avenue Trucking Improvements Winchester Avenue Rehab Project Calumet Park Freight Design Engineering $172,000 Canal Street Viaduct Reconstruction – Adams Street to CDOT Transit Design Engineering $240,000 Madison Street Canal Street Viaduct Reconstruction – Taylor Street to CDOT Transit Design Engineering $300,000 Harrison Harrison Street Chicago Avenue Bus Transit Operations and Pedestrian Safety CDOT Transit Design Engineering $400,000 Improvements Howard Street Streetscape CDOT Roadway Construction $380,000 71st Street Streetscape CDOT Roadway Construction $500,000 79th Street Bus Transit Operations and Pedestrian Safety CDOT Transit Design Engineering $400,000 Improvements Major Taylor Trail – Dan Ryan Cook County Bike/Ped Preliminary Engineering $70,165 Woods Improvements Forest Preserve District -
Burbank/Del Monte SNI Planning Area Boundary February 7, 2002 %
Burbank/DelBurbank/Del MonteMonte SNISNI PlanningPlanning AreaArea AVE TAMARACK UNIVERSITY WAY FREMONT BEL-AIR LIBRARYLIBRARY AVE THETHETHE ALAMEDA ALAMEDAALAMEDA DELMAS SEQUOIA (STATE ROUTE 82) THETHETHE ALAMEDA ALAMEDAALAMEDA AVE ALAMEDA THE BUSH CLEAVES WILSON SINGLETARY SUNOL ATLAS S KEEBLE AVE S MORRISON STOVER HOOVERHOOVER WHITEWHITEWHITE WHITEWHITEWHITE HOOVERHOOVER RACE HOOVERHOOVER WHITEWHITEWHITE HADLEY TRACETRACE TRACETRACE TILLMAN AVE ST DR MCENERYMCENERY LAURELEI AVE MIDDLEMIDDLE SCHOOLSCHOOL HEDDING MIDDLEMIDDLE SCHOOLSCHOOL MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARYELEMENTARY CRANDALL ST DR PARKPARK CAHILL ST ST SCHOOLSCHOOL UNIVER AVE AVE SITY AVE HESTER AVE AVE DR BELLEROSE DR SHASTA STSTST MCALISTER AVE AVE GARLAND STSTST EMORY STSTST GENEVIEVE LN AVE ST AVE WW W SAN SAN SAN FERNANDO FERNANDO FERNANDO AVE WW W SAN SAN SAN FERNANDO FERNANDO FERNANDO AVE AVE ST (STATE ROUTE 87) TRACE AVE ST. LEO THE GREAT HANCHETT (PRIVATE) ST WOZ ST GARDEN DR SONOMA BELLEROSE MCDANIEL GIFFORD LAKEHOUSE S MORRISON S CALAVERAS W SAN FERNANDO ST AVE CLEAVES MARTIN ST NAGLEE AVE AVE OTTERSONST ST DANIEL AVE O'CONNOR DR LINCOLNLINCOLN LINCOLNLINCOLN LUTHER AVE ST SIERRA RANIER ST SENIORSENIOR HIGHHIGH SCHOOLSCHOOL AVE SENIORSENIOR HIGHHIGH SCHOOLSCHOOL AVE FORESTFOREST BROOKLYN AVE WABASH AVE FLORENCE CIRO SALVO DI O'CONNOR RAMOS AVEAVE ST AVE EUGENE AVE WAY FORESTFOREST FORESTFOREST AVE WAY ST AVE POSA AVE JOSEFA CLARMAR AVE AVE AVE BOSTON AVE HESTER AVE AVE MONROE ST MONROE MARI REVEY ST. MARTIN OF TOURS AVE BIRD BIRD BIRD SHASTA AVEAVEBIRD BIRD BIRD YOSEMITENORTON -
I-24 SMART CORRIDOR Leveraging Technology to Improve Safety and Mobility
I-24 SMART CORRIDOR Leveraging Technology to Improve Safety and Mobility Brad Freeze, Director, Traffic Operations Division, TDOT The Need • Interstate 24 (I-24) is a integral part of the Nashville transportation network and a major route for commuters and freight. • Traffic volumes along the I-24 corridor have experienced exponential growth rates over the past decade. Since 2005, traffic volumes have increased more than 60% on I-24 near Murfreesboro. • Currently, peak hour volumes exceed capacity and even a minor incident can have a severe impact on travel time reliability. • Due to physical, environmental, and financial constraints along the Corridor there are no viable, short term roadway widening projects. Area Map I-24 Congestion Contributors Traffic Incidents 27% Incidents Breakdown 2015 Contributors to Congestion (Total Crashes:1,661) Crash History & Analysis I-24 Section Crash Rate Crash Rate Data represents information collected between 2013-2015 System Performance Review AM Peak Period Travel Time I-24 From I-840 to Briley Pkwy. 85 High Variability 75 65 55 Travel Time 95th Percentile 45 Average Travel Time Travel Time (min) Time Travel 35 25 15 Reliability From Exit 78 (SR-96) & Exit 53 (I-440 Interchange), 25 miles Westbound Travel (Weekdays 2014-2016) Buffer time (minutes) Planning time (minutes) Travel time (minutes) 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 39.64 3.59 69.32 30.14 36 27.94 43.98 4.48 73.64 31.04 37.3 27.57 43.57 4.63 73.22 31.18 37.59 27.32 Eastbound Travel (Weekdays 2014-2016) Buffer time (minutes) Planning time (minutes) Travel time (minutes) 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 2.76 19.18 27.22 45.71 24.93 30.63 2.86 22.16 27.31 48.69 24.97 32.53 1.97 25.85 26.43 52.38 24.46 33.92 2014 User Costs 2015 2016 Previous Studies I-24 Multimodal Corridor Study • Identified short- and long-term solutions for improving problem spots along the entire corridor. -
Muncy Creek Township
Muncy Creek Planning Area Plan Adoptions 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Plan Adoptions HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> WOLF TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> Lycoming 2030: Plan the Possible 2 Muncy Creek Planning Area Acknowledgements 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Acknowledgements Muncy Creek Planning Advisory Team (PAT) WALTER REED, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH RICHARD SMITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH STEVE JAQUITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH (ALTERNATE) BILL RAMSEY, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH LINDA STEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH STEVEN CULVER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL POULTON, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP ANGELA SNYDER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL DORMAN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH EUGENE OTTERBEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH DEAN BARTO, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP MELANIE MCCOY, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP TERRY DINCHER, REPRESENTATIVE OF SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP REBECCA FOUGHT, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING RECREATION AUTHORITY DAVID MACIEJEWSKI, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT MICHAEL PAWLIK, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT GENE CAHN, REPRESENTATIVE -
Streeterville Neighborhood Plan 2014 Update II August 18, 2014
Streeterville Neighborhood Plan 2014 update II August 18, 2014 Dear Friends, The Streeterville Neighborhood Plan (“SNP”) was originally written in 2005 as a community plan written by a Chicago community group, SOAR, the Streeterville Organization of Active Resi- dents. SOAR was incorporated on May 28, 1975. Throughout our history, the organization has been a strong voice for conserving the historic character of the area and for development that enables divergent interests to live in harmony. SOAR’s mission is “To work on behalf of the residents of Streeterville by preserving, promoting and enhancing the quality of life and community.” SOAR’s vision is to see Streeterville as a unique, vibrant, beautiful neighborhood. In the past decade, since the initial SNP, there has been significant development throughout the neighborhood. Streeterville’s population has grown by 50% along with new hotels, restaurants, entertainment and institutional buildings creating a mix of uses no other neighborhood enjoys. The balance of all these uses is key to keeping the quality of life the highest possible. Each com- ponent is important and none should dominate the others. The impetus to revising the SNP is the City of Chicago’s many new initiatives, ideas and plans that SOAR wanted to incorporate into our planning document. From “The Pedestrian Plan for the City”, to “Chicago Forward”, to “Make Way for People” to “The Redevelopment of Lake Shore Drive” along with others, the City has changed its thinking of the downtown urban envi- ronment. If we support and include many of these plans into our SNP we feel that there is great- er potential for accomplishing them together. -
4300 W. Roosevelt Road
City of Chicago Lori E. Lightfoot, Mayor Request for Proposals 4300 W. Roosevelt Road Department of Planning and Development Maurice D. Cox, Commissioner City Hall Room 1000 121 N. LaSalle St. Chicago, IL 60602 September 28, 2020 4300 W. Roosevelt Rd. | Request for Proposals September 28, 2020 North Lawndale, Austin, and Humboldt Park INVEST South/West Kickoff 2 City of Chicago September 28, 2020 4300 W. Roosevelt Road Letter from the Commissioner Greetings, On behalf of the City of Chicago, the Department of Planning and Development (DPD) is pleased to present this Request for Proposals (RFP) for a prime development site within the North Lawndale community. The RFP is a key component of Mayor Lori E. Lightfoot’s INVEST South/West neighborhood revitalization strategy for Chicago’s South and West sides. It includes the largest piece of vacant land on the West Side of Chicago, presenting a unique opportunity to create a development that benefits North Lawndale families, workers and visitors. Its location and scope were coordinated following years of community discussion led by Ald. Michael Scott Jr. involving residents, businesses and other stakeholders. In the spirit of INVEST South/West, the RFP also includes a pre-qualified list of design teams that can help a selected respondent fulfill the City’s diversity and inclusivity goals. Additionally, the RFP includes renderings of potential development concepts that were provided on a pro bono basis through a partnership between DPD and students at the Illinois Institute of Technology’s College of Architecture. DPD staff and our community partners appreciate your interest in the site. -
Chapter Provides Information on EGC ESP Site Location, On-Site
CHAPTER 2 Site Characteristics This chapter provides information on the EGC ESP Site location, on-site activities and controls, present and projected population distribution, meteorological, hydrological, geological, and seismological characteristics. The purpose of presenting this information is to provide the bases for demonstrating the adequacy of the site characteristics from a site safety viewpoint and to provide input to support environmental characterization. The influence of the EGC ESP site characteristics on the design and operation of a possible future nuclear power facility will be assessed at the construction and operating license (COL) stage pursuant to 10 CFR 52 Subpart C. REV2 2-1 CHAPTER 2 - SITE CHARACTERISTICS SITE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FOR EGC EARLY SITE PERMIT SECTION 2.1 – GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY 2.1 Geography and Demography 2.1.1 Site Location and Description 2.1.1.1 Specification of Location The EGC ESP Facility will be co-located on the property of the existing CPS Facility and its associated 4,895 ac man-made cooling reservoir (Clinton Lake) (CPS, 2002). The EGC ESP Facility will be located approximately 700 ft south of the existing CPS Facility. The CPS Facility lies within Zone 16 of the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates. The exact UTM coordinates for the EGC ESP Facility will depend upon the specific reactor technology selected for deployment and will be finalized at COL. As shown on Figures 1.2-1 and 2.1-1 there is a complex transportation system surrounding the EGC ESP Site. The nearest major highways are Illinois State Routes 54, 10, and 48, all of which cross the CPS Facility property.