The Lewis and Clark Back Country Byway and Adventure Road
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Stagecoach Trail (#36 on the ASRA Topo Trail Map)
Stagecoach Trail (#36 on the ASRA Topo Trail Map) Distance: 2 miles; 1½ hrs. up, ¾ hrs down “Stagecoach Trail to Russell Road” sign. The (hiking) first ¼ mile is the steepest, but it provides good views of the North Fork American River, at Difficulty: Moderate up, easy down several spots on the right. Slope: 8% avg; 23% max. (see below) At about ¼ mile, the trail turns sharply left at the “Stagecoach Trail” sign. As you pause to catch your breath, you can almost hear the echo of Trailhead / Parking: (N38-55-010; W121-02-207) harness bells on horses and the clatter of stage- Trailhead is at confluence area, 1¾ miles south coaches that once traveled this road. of ASRA Park Headquarters. Take Hwy 49 from A short distance up the trail, the graceful arches Auburn south to Old Foresthill Road at the bottom of Mt. Quarries RR Bridge come into view on the of the canyon. Continue straight for ¼ mile and left. A little further along, the appearance of park on the left. Trailhead is just beyond parking ponderosa pine, big leaf maple, interior live oak, area at green gate near kiosk and port-a-potty. blue oak, willow, and Himalayan blackberry bushes signal the first of several riparian Description corridors on the trail. Here you can see water This historic trail offers great, bird’s eye views of running year round, unlike other spots on the the confluence area and American River canyon. trail where it is only visible in winter and spring. Its gradual gradient offers a good aerobic workout A little further on, a narrow unmarked trail known on the way up, climbing 800 ft in 2 miles from the as Tinker’s Cut-off intersects on the left. -
General Vertical Files Anderson Reading Room Center for Southwest Research Zimmerman Library
“A” – biographical Abiquiu, NM GUIDE TO THE GENERAL VERTICAL FILES ANDERSON READING ROOM CENTER FOR SOUTHWEST RESEARCH ZIMMERMAN LIBRARY (See UNM Archives Vertical Files http://rmoa.unm.edu/docviewer.php?docId=nmuunmverticalfiles.xml) FOLDER HEADINGS “A” – biographical Alpha folders contain clippings about various misc. individuals, artists, writers, etc, whose names begin with “A.” Alpha folders exist for most letters of the alphabet. Abbey, Edward – author Abeita, Jim – artist – Navajo Abell, Bertha M. – first Anglo born near Albuquerque Abeyta / Abeita – biographical information of people with this surname Abeyta, Tony – painter - Navajo Abiquiu, NM – General – Catholic – Christ in the Desert Monastery – Dam and Reservoir Abo Pass - history. See also Salinas National Monument Abousleman – biographical information of people with this surname Afghanistan War – NM – See also Iraq War Abousleman – biographical information of people with this surname Abrams, Jonathan – art collector Abreu, Margaret Silva – author: Hispanic, folklore, foods Abruzzo, Ben – balloonist. See also Ballooning, Albuquerque Balloon Fiesta Acequias – ditches (canoas, ground wáter, surface wáter, puming, water rights (See also Land Grants; Rio Grande Valley; Water; and Santa Fe - Acequia Madre) Acequias – Albuquerque, map 2005-2006 – ditch system in city Acequias – Colorado (San Luis) Ackerman, Mae N. – Masonic leader Acoma Pueblo - Sky City. See also Indian gaming. See also Pueblos – General; and Onate, Juan de Acuff, Mark – newspaper editor – NM Independent and -
V&Tojttlj Fifam]^ A*K>$Fb WZ&N
NFS Form 10400 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Lee's Ferry and Lonely Dell Ranch other name/site number: Pahreah Crossing; Lees Ferry; Lee's Ferry Ranch/AZ-C-2-42, AZ-C-2-11 2. Location __ _________________ street & number: Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (GLCA), at confluence of Colorado and Paria rivers, near the Utah and Arizona border not for publication: N/A vicinity: x city/town: Marble Canyon state: Arizona code: AZ county: Coconino code: 005 zip code: 86036 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets _ _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _ nationally )^ statewide _ locally, ( _ See continuation sheet for addrtkSial comments.) . f\ ffytaJl_(y /l-f ^^/^li^^c^Cii^-P^-' j'J'/~ 77 Signature of certifying official/Title O Date USDI National Park Service, Washington State or Federal agency or bureau In my opinion, the property */ meets does not meet the National Register criteria. -V&toJttlJ fifaM]^ A*K>$fb WZ&n/1 Signature oT ccmmentFng or other official Da*te / Arizona State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency and bureau 4. -
Biological Assessment
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .................................................................................................................... 1 3 PROPOSED ACTION ................................................................................................................................. 2 3.1 Project Area ............................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Proposed Action ........................................................................................................................ 4 3.2.1 Current Permit ....................................................................................................................... 4 3.2.2 Grazing System ..................................................................................................................... 4 3.2.3 Conservation Measures ........................................................................................................ 5 3.2.4 Changes From Existing Management ................................................................................... 5 3.2.5 Resource Objectives and Standards .................................................................................... 6 3.2.6 Annual Grazing Use indicators .............................................................................................. 7 -
Characteristics and Estimates of Visitors to Montana's Historic Virginia and Nevada Cities
Characteristics and Estimates of Visitors to Montana's Historic Virginia and Nevada Cities Research Report 73 February 2000 Characteristics and Estimates of Visitors to Montana's Historic Virginia and Nevada Cities Prepared by Kim McMahon Norma P. Nickerson, Ph.D. Research Report 73 February 2000 Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research School of Forestry The University of Montana Missoula, MT www.forestry.umt.edu/itrr Funded by the Lodging Facility Use Tax The Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research School of Forestry The University of Montana Missoula, MT 59812 (406) 243-5686 www.forestry.umt.edu/itrr Title of Report: Characteristics and Estimates of Visitors to Montana's Historic Virginia and Nevada Cities Report Number: Research Report 73 Authors: Kim McMahon, Norma Nickerson Month Published: February 2000 Executive Summary Introduction Visitors to Virginia and Nevada City were divided into two groups: Montana Visitors : visitors from Montana who have a residence besides Virginia City, Nevada City, or Sheridan, Montana. Out-of-State Visitors : visitors with residence outside of Montana. Methodology Traffic counters and traffic intercepts were used to establish total traffic through Virginia and Nevada City from July 1 through September 30, 1999. Traffic intercepts occurred during three four-day intervals throughout the study period in order to describe the population of vehicles that passed over the traffic counters. Privately-owned vehicles were pulled off the roadway for a brief interview regarding current place of residence, number of adults and youth in the travel group, length of time spent in Virginia and Nevada City, and rental vehicles. In all, 11,696 vehicles were counted during the 12 intercept days. -
Kidnapped and Sold Into Marriage on the Lewis and Clark Expedition
Fact or Fiction? Name: _________________________ Below is a passage on Sacagawea. On the following page is a chart with ten statements. Indicate whether each statement is fact or fiction. Sacagawea was born sometime around 1790. She is best known for her role in assisting the Lewis and Clark expedition. She and her husband were guides from the Great Plains to the Pacific Ocean and back. Kidnapped and Sold into Marriage Sacagawea was kidnapped from her Shoshone village by Hidatsa Indians when she was twelve years old. She was promptly sold into slavery. She was then sold to a French fur trapper by the name of Toussaint Charbonneau. The pair became married and had a son named Jean-Baptiste. On the Lewis and Clark Expedition Although there are conflicting opinions concerning how important Sacagawea was to the Lewis and Clark expedition, she did serve as the interpreter and negotiator to the Shoshone tribe - that was led by her brother Cameahwait. She helped them obtain essential supplies and horses while she carried her infant son on her back. Furthermore, Sacagawea helped identify edible plants and herbs and prevented hostile relations with other tribes simply by being with the expedition. She was even more important on the return trip because she was familiar with the areas in which the expedition was traveling. Lewis and Clark received credit for discovering hundreds of animals and plants that Sacagawea had probably seen for years. Although she received no payment for her help, her husband was rewarded with cash and land. Death and Adoption of her Children Six years after the journey, Sacagawea died after giving birth to her daughter Lisette. -
NORMAN K Denzin Sacagawea's Nickname1, Or the Sacagawea
NORMAN K DENZIN Sacagawea’s Nickname1, or The Sacagawea Problem The tropical emotion that has created a legendary Sacajawea awaits study...Few others have had so much sentimental fantasy expended on them. A good many men who have written about her...have obviously fallen in love with her. Almost every woman who has written about her has become Sacajawea in her inner reverie (DeVoto, 195, p. 618; see also Waldo, 1978, p. xii). Anyway, what it all comes down to is this: the story of Sacagawea...can be told a lot of different ways (Allen, 1984, p. 4). Many millions of Native American women have lived and died...and yet, until quite recently, only two – Pocahantas and Sacagawea – have left even faint tracings of their personalities on history (McMurtry, 001, p. 155). PROLOGUE 1 THE CAMERA EYE (1) 2: Introduction: Voice 1: Narrator-as-Dramatist This essay3 is a co-performance text, a four-act play – with act one and four presented here – that builds on and extends the performance texts presented in Denzin (004, 005).4 “Sacagawea’s Nickname, or the Sacagawea Problem” enacts a critical cultural politics concerning Native American women and their presence in the Lewis and Clark Journals. It is another telling of how critical race theory and critical pedagogy meet popular history. The revisionist history at hand is the history of Sacagawea and the representation of Native American women in two cultural and symbolic landscapes: the expedition journals, and Montana’s most famous novel, A B Guthrie, Jr.’s mid-century novel (1947), Big Sky (Blew, 1988, p. -
The Sacagawea Mystique: Her Age, Name, Role and Final Destiny Columbia Magazine, Fall 1999: Vol
History Commentary - The Sacagawea Mystique: Her Age, Name, Role and Final Destiny Columbia Magazine, Fall 1999: Vol. 13, No. 3 By Irving W. Anderson EDITOR'S NOTE The United States Mint has announced the design for a new dollar coin bearing a conceptual likeness of Sacagawea on the front and the American eagle on the back. It will replace and be about the same size as the current Susan B. Anthony dollar but will be colored gold and have an edge distinct from the quarter. Irving W. Anderson has provided this biographical essay on Sacagawea, the Shoshoni Indian woman member of the Lewis and Clark expedition, as background information prefacing the issuance of the new dollar. THE RECORD OF the 1804-06 "Corps of Volunteers on an Expedition of North Western Discovery" (the title Lewis and Clark used) is our nation's "living history" legacy of documented exploration across our fledgling republic's pristine western frontier. It is a story written in inspired spelling and with an urgent sense of purpose by ordinary people who accomplished extraordinary deeds. Unfortunately, much 20th-century secondary literature has created lasting though inaccurate versions of expedition events and the roles of its members. Among the most divergent of these are contributions to the exploring enterprise made by its Shoshoni Indian woman member, Sacagawea, and her destiny afterward. The intent of this text is to correct America's popular but erroneous public image of Sacagawea by relating excerpts of her actual life story as recorded in the writings of her contemporaries, people who actually knew her, two centuries ago. -
Edings of The
Proceedings of the FIRE HISTORYIISTORY WORKSHOP October 20-24, 1980 Tucson, Arizona General Technical Report RM.81 Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Dedication The attendees of The Fire History Workshop wish to dedicate these proceedings to Mr. Harold Weaver in recognition of his early work in applying the science of dendrochronology in the determination of forest fire histories; for his pioneering leadership in the use of prescribed fire in ponderosa pine management; and for his continued interest in the effects of fire on various ecosystems. Stokes, Marvin A., and John H. Dieterich, tech. coord. 1980. Proceedings of the fire history workshop. October 20-24, 1980, Tucson, Arizona. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-81, 142 p. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Cob. The purpose of the workshop was to exchange information on sampling procedures, research methodologies, preparation and interpretation of specimen material, terminology, and the appli- cation and significance of findings, emphasizing the relationship of dendrochronology procedures to fire history interpretations. Proceedings of the FIRE HISTORY WORKSHOP October 20.24, 1980 Tucson, Arizona Marvin A. Stokes and John H. Dieterich Technical Coordinators Sponsored By: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture and Laboratory of Tree.Ring Research University of Arizona General Technical Report RM-81 Forest Service Rocky Mountain Forest and Range U.S. Department of Agriculture Experiment Station Fort Collins, Colorado Foreword the Fire has played a role in shaping many of the the process of identifying and describing plant communities found in the world today. -
Lemhi County, Idaho
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BUIJLETIN 528 GEOLOGY AND ORE DEPOSITS 1 OF LEMHI COUNTY, IDAHO BY JOSEPH B. UMPLEBY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1913 CONTENTS. Page. Outline of report.......................................................... 11 Introduction.............................................................. 15 Scope of report......................................................... 15 Field work and acknowledgments...................................... 15 Early work............................................................ 16 Geography. .........> ....................................................... 17 Situation and access.........................--.-----------.-..--...-.. 17 Climate, vegetation, and animal life....................----.-----.....- 19 Mining................................................................ 20 General conditions.......... 1..................................... 20 History..............................-..............-..........:... 20 Production.................................,.........'.............. 21 Physiography.............................................................. 22 Existing topography.................................................... 22 Physiographic development............................................. 23 General features...............................................'.... 23 Erosion surface.................................................... 25 Correlation............. 1.......................................... -
WORK PLAN BEAVERHEAD RIVER WATERSHED UPDATED: January 2009
WORK PLAN BEAVERHEAD RIVER WATERSHED UPDATED: January 2009 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The purpose for this watershed plan is to: (1) Identify and document resource concerns within the watershed, both water and non- water related. (2) Prioritize those concerns (3) Outline objectives and methods of addressing those concerns (4) Provide guidance in the implementation of action plans and other associated watershed activities. This document will be maintained as a guide for watershed activities, and will be updated annually to reflect current circumstances in the watershed including reprioritization of concerns and addition of new areas of concentration. BEAVERHEAD RIVER WATERSHED COMMITTEE – MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Beaverhead Watershed Committee is to seek an understanding of the watershed – how it functions and supports the human communities dependent upon it – and to build agreement on watershed-related planning issues among stakeholders with diverse viewpoints. Goals: . Provide a mechanism and forum for landowners, citizens, and agencies to work together to: . Identify problems and concerns both riparian and non-riparian, urban and rural. Reach agreement upon the priority of and methods for addressing those concerns. Act as a conduit between local interests and agencies for purposes of procuring the funding and non-monetary assistance necessary to begin systematically addressing priority concerns. Foster a cooperative environment where conflict is avoided, and work to resolve conflict as necessary for the watershed effort to move forward. Stay abreast of opportunities, issues, and developments that could be either beneficial or detrimental to the watershed or segments of the watershed. Keep stakeholders appropriately informed. Objectives: . Continuous Improvement – Maintain a broad range of active improvement projects/programs relating to diverse attributes of the watershed. -
Lewis & Clark Timeline
LEWIS & CLARK TIMELINE The following time line provides an overview of the incredible journey of the Lewis & Clark Expedition. Beginning with preparations for the journey in 1803, it highlights the Expedition’s exploration of the west and concludes with its return to St. Louis in 1806. For a more detailed time line, please see www.monticello.org and follow the Lewis & Clark links. 1803 JANUARY 18, 1803 JULY 6, 1803 President Thomas Jefferson sends a secret letter to Lewis stops in Harpers Ferry (in present-day West Virginia) Congress asking for $2,500 to finance an expedition to and purchases supplies and equipment. explore the Missouri River. The funding is approved JULY–AUGUST, 1803 February 28. Lewis spends over a month in Pittsburgh overseeing APRIL–MAY, 1803 construction of a 55-foot keelboat. He and 11 men head Meriwether Lewis is sent to Philadelphia to be tutored down the Ohio River on August 31. by some of the nation’s leading scientists (including OCTOBER 14, 1803 Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Smith Barton, Robert Patterson, and Caspar Wistar). He also purchases supplies that will Lewis arrives at Clarksville, across the Ohio River from be needed on the journey. present-day Louisville, Kentucky, and soon meets up with William Clark. Clark’s African-American slave York JULY 4, 1803 and nine men from Kentucky are added to the party. The United States’s purchase of the 820,000-square mile DECEMBER 8–9, 1803 Louisiana territory from France for $15 million is announced. Lewis leaves Washington the next day. Lewis and Clark arrive in St.