Contents & Distribution Data
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Zoology SYLLABUS 2016
ST. PHILOMENA’S COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS), MYSORE-570 015 Subject- ZOOLOGY Syllabus for B.A, Course under Semester Scheme. The Scheme of Teaching & Examination FROM THE ACADEMIC YEAR- 2016 Onwards Semester Title of the Paper Q. P. Code Teaching Scheme Examination Scheme Number Hours per Week Theory/ I A Total Practical Max Marks Proper Max. Marks hours Marks Theory Credits Practical Duration in in Duration MA 630 MA 631 IA T-60 T IA-10 3 I Animal Diversity I MA 632 PR-1 3 4.5 6 P-20 P IA-10 100 MA 633 PR- IA MB 630 MB 631 IA T-60 T IA-10 3 II Animal Diversity II MB632 PR-1 3 4.5 6 P-20 P IA-10 100 MB 633 PR- IA MC 630 T-60 T IA-10 MC 631 IA 3 III Animal Diversity III 3 4.5 6 P-20 P IA-10 100 MC 632 PR-1 MC 633 PR-1 MD 630 T-60 T IA-10 Biochemistry and MD 631 IA 3 IV 3 4.5 6 P-20 P IA-10 100 physiology MD 632 PR-1 MD 633 PR-1 ME 630 T IA T IA -20 Cell biology & ME 631 T IA 3 T- 80 3 4.5 6 P IA- 150 Immunology (P-5) ME 634 PR P- 40 10 ME 635 PR IA V ME 632 T IA Development biology T IA -20 ME 633 T IA 3 T- 80 & endocrinology 3 4.5 6 P IA- 150 ME 636 PR P- 40 (P-6) 10 ME 637 PR IA MF 630 T IA T IA -20 Genetics & evolution MF 631 T IA 3 T- 80 3 4.5 6 P IA- 150 (P-7) MF 634 PR P- 40 10 MF 635 PR IA VI MF 632 T IA Environmental T IA -20 MF 633 T IA 3 T- 80 Biology & Ethnology 3 4.5 6 P IA- 150 MF 636 PR P- 40 (P-8) 10 MF 637 PR IA ST. -
Pre-Incursion Plan PIP006 Salamanders and Newts
Pre-incursion Plan PIP006 Salamanders and Newts Pre-incursion Plan PIP006 Salamanders and Newts Order: Ambystomatidae, Cryptobranchidea and Proteidae Scope This plan is in place to guide prevention and eradication activities and the management of non-indigenous populations of Salamanders and Newts (Order Caudata; Families Salamandridae, Ambystomatidae, Cryptobranchidea and Proteidae) amphibians in the wild in Victoria. Version Document Status Date Author Reviewed By Approved for Release 1.0 First Draft 26/07/11 Dana Price M. Corry, S. Wisniewski and A. Woolnough 1.1 Second Draft 21/10/11 Dana Price S. Wisniewski 2.0 Final Draft 18/01/2012 Dana Price 3.0 Revision Draft 12/11/15 Dana Price J. Goldsworthy 3.1 New Final 10/03/2016 Nigel Roberts D.Price New DEDJTR templates and document review Published by the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Agriculture Victoria, May 2016 © The State of Victoria 2016. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 1 Spring Street, Melbourne 3000. Front cover: Smooth Newt (Lissotriton vulgaris) Photo: Image courtesy of High Risk Invasive Animals group, DEDJTR Photo: Image from Wikimedia Commons and reproduced with permission under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic License. ISBN 078-1-925532-40-1 (pdf/online) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. -
Linnaeus, 1758) from Bozcaada (Çanakkale, Turkey
Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2017) 41: 189-195 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Short Communication doi:10.3906/zoo-1602-14 Taxonomic status of a newly described island population of the smooth newt Lissotriton vulgaris (Linnaeus, 1758) from Bozcaada (Çanakkale, Turkey) 1 1 1 2, Nurşen ÇÖRDÜK , Çiğdem GÜL , Murat TOSUNOĞLU , Konstantinos SOTIROPOULOS * 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey 2 Department of Biological Applications and Technologies, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece Received: 08.02.2016 Accepted/Published Online: 16.05.2016 Final Version: 25.01.2017 Abstract: The taxonomic status and phylogenetic position of the recently recorded smooth newt (Lissotriton vulgaris) population from the island of Bozcaada (Çanakkale, Turkey) is clarified on the basis of morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. The L. vulgaris population from Bozcaada presents body proportions and morphological features of subsp. schmidtlerorum, such as small body length, absence of the tail filament, and dorsal crest with pointed free margin. Similarly, phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial DNA sequences (ND4, 16S rRNA) place the Bozcaada population within Clade E of the recent L. vulgaris phylogeny, which consists of L. v. schmidtlerorum populations. Key words: Lissotriton vulgaris schmidtlerorum, mitochondrial DNA, 16S rRNA, ND4, taxonomy, Bozcaada (Tenedos), Turkey The smooth newt, Lissotriton vulgaris L., is a polytypic Raffaëlli, 2009), on the basis of mitochondrial sequences amphibian species with a wide range across Eurasia, (Mettouris and Kornilios, 2015). This geographically extending from Western Europe, excluding Iberia, further restricted subspecies is distributed along the Marmara east to Western Siberia and Western Anatolia. -
Amphibiaweb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth
AmphibiaWeb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth Created and Illustrated by the 2020-2021 AmphibiaWeb URAP Team: Alice Drozd, Arjun Mehta, Ash Reining, Kira Wiesinger, and Ann T. Chang This introduction to amphibians was written by University of California, Berkeley AmphibiaWeb Undergraduate Research Apprentices for people who love amphibians. Thank you to the many AmphibiaWeb apprentices over the last 21 years for their efforts. Edited by members of the AmphibiaWeb Steering Committee CC BY-NC-SA 2 Dedicated in loving memory of David B. Wake Founding Director of AmphibiaWeb (8 June 1936 - 29 April 2021) Dave Wake was a dedicated amphibian biologist who mentored and educated countless people. With the launch of AmphibiaWeb in 2000, Dave sought to bring the conservation science and basic fact-based biology of all amphibians to a single place where everyone could access the information freely. Until his last day, David remained a tirelessly dedicated scientist and ally of the amphibians of the world. 3 Table of Contents What are Amphibians? Their Characteristics ...................................................................................... 7 Orders of Amphibians.................................................................................... 7 Where are Amphibians? Where are Amphibians? ............................................................................... 9 What are Bioregions? ..................................................................................10 Conservation of Amphibians Why Save Amphibians? ............................................................................. -
Comparative Osteology and Evolution of the Lungless Salamanders, Family Plethodontidae David B
COMPARATIVE OSTEOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF THE LUNGLESS SALAMANDERS, FAMILY PLETHODONTIDAE DAVID B. WAKE1 ABSTRACT: Lungless salamanders of the family Plethodontidae comprise the largest and most diverse group of tailed amphibians. An evolutionary morphological approach has been employed to elucidate evolutionary rela tionships, patterns and trends within the family. Comparative osteology has been emphasized and skeletons of all twenty-three genera and three-fourths of the one hundred eighty-three species have been studied. A detailed osteological analysis includes consideration of the evolution of each element as well as the functional unit of which it is a part. Functional and developmental aspects are stressed. A new classification is suggested, based on osteological and other char acters. The subfamily Desmognathinae includes the genera Desmognathus, Leurognathus, and Phaeognathus. Members of the subfamily Plethodontinae are placed in three tribes. The tribe Hemidactyliini includes the genera Gyri nophilus, Pseudotriton, Stereochilus, Eurycea, Typhlomolge, and Hemidac tylium. The genera Plethodon, Aneides, and Ensatina comprise the tribe Pleth odontini. The highly diversified tribe Bolitoglossini includes three super genera. The supergenera Hydromantes and Batrachoseps include the nominal genera only. The supergenus Bolitoglossa includes Bolitoglossa, Oedipina, Pseudoeurycea, Chiropterotriton, Parvimolge, Lineatriton, and Thorius. Manculus is considered to be congeneric with Eurycea, and Magnadig ita is congeneric with Bolitoglossa. Two species are assigned to Typhlomolge, which is recognized as a genus distinct from Eurycea. No. new information is available concerning Haptoglossa. Recognition of a family Desmognathidae is rejected. All genera are defined and suprageneric groupings are defined and char acterized. Range maps are presented for all genera. Relationships of all genera are discussed. -
Lista Patrón De Los Anfibios Y Reptiles De España (Actualizada a Diciembre De 2014)
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/272447364 Lista patrón de los anfibios y reptiles de España (Actualizada a diciembre de 2014) TECHNICAL REPORT · DECEMBER 2014 CITATIONS READS 2 383 4 AUTHORS: Miguel A. Carretero Inigo Martinez-Solano University of Porto Estación Biológica de Doñana 256 PUBLICATIONS 1,764 CITATIONS 91 PUBLICATIONS 1,158 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Enrique Ayllon Gustavo A. Llorente ASOCIACION HERPETOLOGICA ESPAÑOLA University of Barcelona 30 PUBLICATIONS 28 CITATIONS 210 PUBLICATIONS 1,239 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Available from: Inigo Martinez-Solano Retrieved on: 13 November 2015 Lista patrón de los anfibios y reptiles de España | Diciembre 2014 Lista patrón de los anfibios y reptiles de España (Actualizada a diciembre de 2014) Editada por: Miguel A. Carretero Íñigo Martínez-Solano Enrique Ayllón Gustavo Llorente (Comisión permanente de taxonomía de la AHE) La siguiente lista patrón tiene como base la primera lista patrón: MONTORI, A.; LLORENTE, G. A.; ALONSO-ZARAZAGA, M. A.; ARRIBAS, O.; AYLLÓN, E.; BOSCH, J.; CARRANZA, S.; CARRETERO, M. A.; GALÁN, P.; GARCÍA-PARÍS, M.; HARRIS, D. J.; LLUCH, J.; MÁRQUEZ, R.; MATEO, J. A.; NAVARRO, P.; ORTIZ, M.; PÉREZ- MELLADO, V.; PLEGUEZUELOS, J. M.; ROCA, V.; SANTOS, X. & TEJEDO, M. (2005): Conclusiones de nomenclatura y taxonomía para las especies de anfibios y reptiles de España. MONTORI, A. & LLORENTE, G. A. (coord.). Asociación Herpetológica Española, Barcelona. En caso de aquellos ítems sin comentarios, la información correspondiente se encuentra en esta primera lista, que está descargable en: http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/biodiversidad/temas/inventarios- nacionales/lista_herpetofauna_2005_tcm7-22734.pdf Para aquellos ítems con nuevos comentarios, impliquen o no su modificación, se adjunta la correspondiente explicación con una clave numerada (#). -
Piano D'azione Salamandra Finale
PIANO D’AZIONE PER LA SALAMANDRA ATRA AURORAE E SALAMANDRA ATRA PASUBIENSIS IN VENETO - 2009-2013 N0N0N0 PIANO D’AZIONE PER PROGETTO LIFE04 NAT/IT/000167 “SISTEMA AURORA” PIANO D’AZIONE PER Salamandra atra aurorae e Salamandra atra pasubiensispasubiensis AGGIORNAMENTO LUGLIO 2008 Area di riferimento : Veneto PERIODO DI VALIDITÀ 2009-2013 MARIANNA BELLON, STEFANO FILACORDA (a cura di) PROGETTO LIFE04 NAT/IT/000167 : “SISTEMA AURORA” 1 PIANO D’AZIONE PER LA SALAMANDRA ATRA AURORAE E SALAMANDRA ATRA PASUBIENSIS IN VENETO - 2009-2013 1. INTRODUZIONE ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Aspetti normativi ................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Biologia e status .................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Sistematica ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.2. Morfologia .................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.3 Habitat ........................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.4. Ecologia ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.2.5 Struttura della popolazione ........................................................................................ -
About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization. -
Calotriton Asper)
Amphibia-Reptilia (2014) DOI:10.1163/15685381-00002921 Life history trait differences between a lake and a stream-dwelling population of the Pyrenean brook newt (Calotriton asper) Neus Oromi1,∗, Fèlix Amat2, Delfi Sanuy1, Salvador Carranza3 Abstract. The Pyrenean brook newt (Calotriton asper) is a salamandrid that mostly lives in fast running and cold mountain- streams, although some populations are also found in lakes. In the present work, we report in detail on the occurrence of facultative paedomorphosis traits in a population from a Pyrenean high altitude lake. We compare its morphology, life history traits and mitochondrial DNA variation with a nearby lotic metamorphic population. Our results indicate that the lacustrine newts are smaller and present a less developed sexual dimorphism, smooth skin, and that 53% of the adults retain gills at different degrees of development, but not gill slits. Although both populations and sexes have the same age at sexual maturity (four years), the lacustrine population presents higher longevity (12 and 9 years for males and females, respectively) than the one living in the stream (8 and 9 years). The variation on the climatic conditions at altitudinal scale is probably the main cause of the differences in life history traits found between the two populations. The food availability, which could to be limiting in the lacustrine population, is another factor that can potentially affect body size. These results are congruent with the significant mitochondrial DNA genetic isolation between populations, probably a consequence of the lack of juvenile dispersal. We found low cytochrome b variability and significant genetic structuring in the lake population that is very remarkably considering the short distance to the nearby stream population and the whole species’ pattern. -
50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–20 Edition) § 16.14
§ 15.41 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–20 Edition) Species Common name Serinus canaria ............................................................. Common Canary. 1 Note: Permits are still required for this species under part 17 of this chapter. (b) Non-captive-bred species. The list 16.14 Importation of live or dead amphib- in this paragraph includes species of ians or their eggs. non-captive-bred exotic birds and coun- 16.15 Importation of live reptiles or their tries for which importation into the eggs. United States is not prohibited by sec- Subpart C—Permits tion 15.11. The species are grouped tax- onomically by order, and may only be 16.22 Injurious wildlife permits. imported from the approved country, except as provided under a permit Subpart D—Additional Exemptions issued pursuant to subpart C of this 16.32 Importation by Federal agencies. part. 16.33 Importation of natural-history speci- [59 FR 62262, Dec. 2, 1994, as amended at 61 mens. FR 2093, Jan. 24, 1996; 82 FR 16540, Apr. 5, AUTHORITY: 18 U.S.C. 42. 2017] SOURCE: 39 FR 1169, Jan. 4, 1974, unless oth- erwise noted. Subpart E—Qualifying Facilities Breeding Exotic Birds in Captivity Subpart A—Introduction § 15.41 Criteria for including facilities as qualifying for imports. [Re- § 16.1 Purpose of regulations. served] The regulations contained in this part implement the Lacey Act (18 § 15.42 List of foreign qualifying breed- U.S.C. 42). ing facilities. [Reserved] § 16.2 Scope of regulations. Subpart F—List of Prohibited Spe- The provisions of this part are in ad- cies Not Listed in the Appen- dition to, and are not in lieu of, other dices to the Convention regulations of this subchapter B which may require a permit or prescribe addi- § 15.51 Criteria for including species tional restrictions or conditions for the and countries in the prohibited list. -
The Salamanders of Tennessee
Salamanders of Tennessee: modified from Lisa Powers tnwildlife.org Follow links to Nongame The Salamanders of Tennessee Photo by John White Salamanders are the group of tailed, vertebrate animals that along with frogs and caecilians make up the class Amphibia. Salamanders are ectothermic (cold-blooded), have smooth glandular skin, lack claws and must have a moist environment in which to live. 1 Amphibian Declines Worldwide, over 200 amphibian species have experienced recent population declines. Scientists have reports of 32 species First discovered in 1967, the golden extinctions, toad, Bufo periglenes, was last seen mainly species of in 1987. frogs. Much attention has been given to the Anurans (frogs) in recent years, however salamander populations have been poorly monitored. Photo by Henk Wallays Fire Salamander - Salamandra salamandra terrestris 2 Why The Concern For Salamanders in Tennessee? Their key role and high densities in many forests The stability in their counts and populations Their vulnerability to air and water pollution Their sensitivity as a measure of change The threatened and endangered status of several species Their inherent beauty and appeal as a creature to study and conserve. *Possible Factors Influencing Declines Around the World Climate Change Habitat Modification Habitat Fragmentation Introduced Species UV-B Radiation Chemical Contaminants Disease Trade in Amphibians as Pets *Often declines are caused by a combination of factors and do not have a single cause. Major Causes for Declines in Tennessee Habitat Modification -The destruction of natural habitats is undoubtedly the biggest threat facing amphibians in Tennessee. Housing, shopping center, industrial and highway construction are all increasing throughout the state and consequently decreasing the amount of available habitat for amphibians. -
Batrachochytrium Salamandrivorans Threat to the Iberian Urodele Hotspot
Journal of Fungi Article Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans Threat to the Iberian Urodele Hotspot Jaime Bosch 1,2,*, An Martel 3 , Jarrod Sopniewski 4 , Barbora Thumsová 1,2,5, Cesar Ayres 5, Ben C. Scheele 4,†, Guillermo Velo-Antón 6,7,† and Frank Pasmans 3,† 1 Biodiversity Research Institute (IMIB), University of Oviedo-Principality of Asturias-CSIC, 33600 Mieres, Spain; [email protected] 2 Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, 28006 Madrid, Spain 3 Wildlife Health Ghent, Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Poultry Diseases, Ghent University, B9820 Merelbeke, Belgium; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (F.P.) 4 Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia; [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (B.C.S.) 5 Asociación Herpetologica Española, 28006 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 6 CIBIO/InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal; [email protected] 7 Grupo GEA, Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-6-777-724-02 † These author contributed equally to this paper. Abstract: The recent introduction of the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans into north- eastern Spain threatens salamander diversity on the Iberian Peninsula. We assessed the current epidemiological situation with extensive field sampling of urodele populations. We then sought to delineate priority regions and identify conservation units for the Iberian Peninsula by estimating the susceptibility of Iberian urodeles using laboratory experiments, evidence from mortality events Citation: Bosch, J.; Martel, A.; in nature and captivity and inference from phylogeny.